TRV
Translation
Study This Verse
Commentary on 1 Chronicles 1 verses 1–27
1 ¶ Adam, Sheth, Enosh,
2 Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered,
3 Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech,
4 Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
5 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.
6 And the sons of Gomer; Ashchenaz, and Riphath, and Togarmah.
7 And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim.
8 The sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.
9 And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabta, and Raamah, and Sabtecha. And the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.
10 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be mighty upon the earth.
11 And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim,
12 And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (of whom came the Philistines,) and Caphthorim.
13 And Canaan begat Zidon his firstborn, and Heth,
14 The Jebusite also, and the Amorite, and the Girgashite,
15 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
16 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite.
17 The sons of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram, and Uz, and Hul, and Gether, and Meshech.
18 And Arphaxad begat Shelah, and Shelah begat Eber.
19 And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg; because in his days the earth was divided: and his brother's name was Joktan.
20 And Joktan begat Almodad, and Sheleph, and Hazarmaveth, and Jerah,
21 Hadoram also, and Uzal, and Diklah,
22 And Ebal, and Abimael, and Sheba,
23 And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan.
24 Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,
25 Eber, Peleg, Reu,
26 Serug, Nahor, Terah,
27 Abram; the same is Abraham.
This paragraph has Adam for its first word and Abraham for its last. Between the creation of the former and the birth of the latter were 2000 years, almost the one-half of which time Adam himself lived. Adam was the common father of our flesh, Abraham the common father of the faithful. By the breach which the former made of the covenant of innocency, we were all made miserable; by the covenant of grace made with the latter, we all are, or may be, made happy. We all are, by nature, the seed of Adam, branches of that wild olive. Let us see to it that, by faith, we become the seed of Abraham (Rom 4:11, Rom 4:12), that we be grafted into the good olive and partake of its root and fatness.
I. The first four verses of this paragraph, and the last four, which are linked together by Shem (Ch1 1:4, Ch1 1:24), contain the sacred line of Christ from Adam to Abraham, and are inserted in his pedigree, Luk 3:34-38, the order ascending as here it descends. This genealogy proves the falsehood of that reproach, As for this man, we know not whence he is. Bishop Patrick well observes here that, a genealogy being to be drawn of the families of the Jews, this appears as the peculiar glory of the Jewish nation, that they alone were able to derive their pedigree from the first man that God created, which no other nation pretended to, but abused themselves and their posterity with fabulous accounts of their originals, the Arcadians fancying that they were before the moon, the people of Thessaly that they sprang from stones, the Athenians that they grew out of the earth, much like the vain imaginations which some of the philosophers had of the origin of the universe. The account which the holy scripture gives both of the creation of the world and of the rise of nations carries with it as clear evidences of its own truth as those idle traditions do of their own vanity and falsehood.
II. All the verses between repeat the account of the replenishing of the earth by the sons of Noah after the flood. 1. The historian begins with those who were strangers to the church, the sons of Japhet, who were planted in the isles of the Gentiles, those western parts of the world, the countries of Europe. Of these he gives a short account (Ch1 1:5-7), because with these the Jews had hitherto had little or no dealings. 2. He proceeds to those who had many of them been enemies to the church, the sons of Ham, who moved southward towards Africa and those parts of Asia which lay that way. Nimrod the son of Cush began to be an oppressor, probably to the people of God in his time. But Mizraim, from whom came the Egyptians, and Canaan, from whom came the Canaanites, are both of them names of great note in the Jewish story; for with their descendants the Israel of God had severe struggles to get out of the land of Egypt and into the land of Canaan; and therefore the branches of Mizraim are particularly recorded (Ch1 1:11, Ch1 1:12), and of Canaan, Ch1 1:13-16. See at what a rate God valued Israel when he gave Egypt for their ransom (Isa 43:3), and cast out all these nations before them, Psa 80:8. 3. He then gives an account of those that were the ancestors and allies of the church, the posterity of Shem, Ch1 1:17-23. These peopled Asia, and spread themselves eastward. The Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans, Persians, and Arabians, descended from these. At first the originals of the respective nations were known; but at this day, we have reason to think, the nations are so mingled with one another, by the enlargement of commerce and dominion, the transplanting of colonies, the carrying away of captives, and many other circumstances, that no one nation, no, nor the greatest part of any, is descended entire from any one of these fountains. Only this we are sure of, that God has created of one blood all nations of men; they have all descended from one Adam, one Noah. Have we not all one father? Has not one God created us? Mal 2:10. Our register hastens to the line of Abraham, breaking off abruptly from all the other families of the sons of Noah but that of Arphaxad, from whom Christ was to come. The great promise of the Messiah (says bishop Patrick) was translated from Adam to Seth, from him to Shem, from him to Eber, and so to the Hebrew nation, who were entrusted, above all nations, with that sacred treasure, till the promise was performed and the Messiah had come, and then that nation was made not a people.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 1:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
The verse 1 Chronicles 1:26 presents three pivotal names—Serug, Nahor, and Terah—within the extensive genealogies of 1 Chronicles. This concise listing serves as a crucial link in the chronicler's meticulously preserved historical record, bridging the post-diluvian world with the patriarchal era and underscoring God's faithful preservation of the covenant line that would ultimately lead to the nation of Israel and, eventually, the Messiah.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 1:26, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of 1 Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a list of names but a structured literary form with specific theological and historical purposes. The chronicler employs a Concise Listing technique, presenting names without extensive narrative, which serves to emphasize the continuous flow of history and the unbroken chain of descent. This brevity, however, does not diminish their significance; rather, it highlights their role as essential links in a divinely ordained sequence. The repetition of names and the clear sequential order create a sense of Linear Progression, guiding the reader through time and underscoring the deliberate unfolding of God's plan. While seemingly dry, this genealogical format functions as a powerful Historical Affirmation, validating the ancient roots of Israel and the faithfulness of God in preserving the lineage leading to the fulfillment of His promises.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The seemingly simple listing of names in 1 Chronicles 1:26 carries profound theological weight, serving as a testament to God's meticulous sovereignty over human history and His unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan. These names are not random; they represent crucial links in the divinely preserved lineage that would culminate in the nation of Israel and, ultimately, the Messiah. The chronicler's emphasis on this continuity underscores the idea that God works through specific individuals and families across generations, ensuring that His promises are brought to fruition precisely as intended. This verse, therefore, highlights the theme of divine faithfulness, demonstrating how God maintains a chosen line even through periods of obscurity or apparent stagnation, all in preparation for the pivotal moments of His covenantal unfolding. It reminds us that every life, even those seemingly mundane, plays a part in God's grand narrative and contributes to His overarching purposes.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
While a list of ancient names might initially appear distant or irrelevant to contemporary life, 1 Chronicles 1:26 profoundly reminds us of God's active involvement in the minutiae of human history. Each name—Serug, Nahor, Terah—represents a real person, a life lived, a family established, and a crucial link in the unbroken chain of God's redemptive plan. This meticulous preservation of lineage speaks volumes about God's faithfulness and His long-term vision. It teaches us that God's purposes are not rushed or haphazard; they unfold with deliberate precision across generations. For us today, this means recognizing that our lives, too, are part of a larger divine narrative. We are not isolated individuals but participants in God's ongoing work, called to faithfulness in our own generation. Just as these ancient figures, perhaps unaware of their future significance, played their part, so too can our seemingly small acts of obedience and faith contribute to God's grand design. It encourages us to trust in God's sovereign timing and to find purpose in our present, knowing that He is orchestrating all things for His glory and our good, meticulously weaving each life into His magnificent tapestry of salvation.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why does 1 Chronicles begin with such long lists of names?
Answer: The extensive genealogies at the beginning of 1 Chronicles serve several critical purposes for the post-exilic community for whom the book was written. Firstly, they establish the historical continuity of God's people, demonstrating an unbroken lineage from Adam through the patriarchs, the tribes, and the Davidic monarchy. This was crucial for a people returning from exile to re-establish their identity and claim to the land. Secondly, they validate legitimacy for various roles: land ownership was tied to tribal affiliation, priestly service to the line of Aaron, and kingship to the line of David. Thirdly, they underscore God's faithfulness in preserving His covenant people through generations, even amidst periods of unfaithfulness and exile. Names like Serug, Nahor, and Terah, linking back to the earliest narratives in Genesis 11, reinforce the deep historical roots and divine oversight of Israel's story, providing hope and a foundation for rebuilding.
Are these genealogies identical to those found in Genesis? If not, why the differences?
Answer: The genealogies in 1 Chronicles are largely consistent with those found in Genesis, particularly in the earlier sections like the one containing Serug, Nahor, and Terah (Genesis 11:10-26). However, there are occasional differences, omissions, or additions in other parts of the genealogies throughout Chronicles. These variations are generally not contradictions but reflect the chronicler's specific purpose and selective focus. Ancient genealogies were not always intended to be exhaustive "birth certificates" in the modern sense; rather, they were often thematic, highlighting specific lines (e.g., royal, priestly, or those leading to key figures) or serving a particular theological point. The chronicler's primary aim was to establish the legitimate lineage of Israel, particularly the Davidic and priestly lines, for the returning exiles, sometimes abbreviating or emphasizing certain branches to achieve this goal, while maintaining the essential historical truth.
What is the significance of Terah being named in this verse?
Answer: Terah's inclusion in 1 Chronicles 1:26 is profoundly significant because he is explicitly identified as the father of Abram, who would later be renamed Abraham, the patriarch with whom God established His foundational covenant (Genesis 11:27). By naming Terah, the chronicler brings the genealogy to the immediate generation preceding the pivotal figure in Israel's history. This verse serves as a crucial bridge, connecting the broad sweep of human history from Adam and Noah to the specific family through whom God would begin to unfold His redemptive plan for a chosen people. Terah's lineage ensures that Abraham's call is not an isolated event but part of a long, divinely orchestrated historical progression, setting the stage for the covenantal relationship that defines Israel's identity.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
While 1 Chronicles 1:26 lists names centuries before the advent of Christ, its inclusion in the biblical canon, particularly within the meticulously preserved genealogies, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. The chronicler's painstaking effort to trace the lineage from Adam through figures like Serug, Nahor, and Terah, culminating in Abraham and eventually David, underscores God's unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan, a plan that ultimately points to Jesus Christ. These names represent essential links in the human ancestry of the Messiah, demonstrating that Jesus' arrival was not a random event but the culmination of centuries of divine preparation and faithfulness. The promise given to Abraham, that all nations would be blessed through his offspring (Genesis 12:3), finds its ultimate realization in Christ, the true "seed" of Abraham (Galatians 3:16). Furthermore, the genealogies of Jesus in the New Testament, such as those in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38, explicitly include these very names, affirming Jesus' historical connection to this ancient, divinely preserved lineage. Thus, 1 Chronicles 1:26, far from being a mere historical record, serves as a foundational stone in the grand narrative of salvation history, pointing forward to the coming of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world who would redeem humanity.