Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Abram; the same is Abraham.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Abram H87; the same is Abraham H85.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Avram (also called Avraham).
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and Abram (that is, Abraham).
Ask
American Standard Version
Abram (the same is Abraham).
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Abram (the same is Abraham).
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Abram, which is Abraham.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Abram--he is Abraham.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 10,280 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 1:27, a concise yet profoundly significant verse embedded within the extensive genealogies of the Chronicler, marks a pivotal moment in salvation history: the divine renaming of Abram to Abraham. This transformation, far from a mere administrative detail, underscores God's sovereign power to redefine identity and destiny, signifying the patriarch's new covenantal role as the "father of a multitude" and the progenitor of God's chosen people, through whom all nations would ultimately be blessed.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within the meticulous genealogies that open the book of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9). These lists serve as the foundational bedrock for the Chronicler's narrative, tracing the lineage from Adam through the patriarchs, the twelve tribes of Israel, and various prominent families, culminating in the Davidic line. The inclusion of "Abram; the same [is] Abraham" is not merely a factual record but a theological anchor, drawing the reader's attention to a divinely orchestrated identity change that profoundly impacts the subsequent history of Israel. It acts as a crucial marker within the vast expanse of names, highlighting the foundational figure through whom God's covenant promises would flow. The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic community, uses these genealogies to re-establish identity, legitimate land claims, confirm priestly succession, and affirm the unbroken continuity of God's covenant with His people, with Abraham standing as the pivotal link in this divine narrative.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Near Eastern cultures, names were far more than simple labels; they often conveyed identity, character, destiny, or even a prophecy. A change of name, especially one initiated by a deity, signified a profound shift in status, purpose, or relationship, indicating a new divine mandate or covenant. For the Israelites, genealogies were vital legal and social documents, establishing tribal affiliations, inheritance rights, and eligibility for roles like the priesthood or kingship. The Chronicler's audience, having returned from Babylonian exile, faced the daunting task of reconstructing their national and religious identity. Presenting an unbroken lineage from Adam to Abraham, and then to David and beyond, served to reassure them of their divine heritage and God's enduring faithfulness to His promises, despite the disruptions of exile. The renaming of Abram to Abraham, therefore, was a culturally understood sign of a new, divinely appointed destiny for the patriarch and, by extension, for the nation of Israel.
  • Key Themes: The verse, despite its brevity, contributes significantly to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Transformation and Sovereignty, showcasing God's absolute authority to rename and redefine individuals according to His redemptive purposes, as detailed in Genesis 17:5. Secondly, it underscores Covenant Faithfulness, as the renaming is intrinsically linked to God's solemn promise to make Abram the "father of a multitude," a promise first articulated in Genesis 12:2 and expanded upon throughout Genesis 17. This highlights God's unwavering commitment to His word across generations. Thirdly, it emphasizes Historical and Theological Continuity, bridging the gap between primordial history and the specific lineage of Israel. By explicitly stating "the same is Abraham," the Chronicler affirms the unbroken line of God's chosen people, rooted in the foundational figure of Abraham, whose faith and covenant relationship define the identity of the nation.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Abram (Hebrew, 'Abrâm', H87): This original name is described as "contracted from אֲבִירָם," meaning "high father." It reflects a respectable and honorable status, perhaps indicating a prominent position within his family or community. This name speaks to his personal standing before God's transformative intervention, signifying a father of esteemed position, but not inherently carrying the expansive promise of a vast progeny.
  • Abraham (Hebrew, 'Abrâhâm', H85): This divinely bestowed name is described as "contracted from אָב and an unused root (probably meaning to be populous)," resulting in the meaning "father of a multitude." This new name, given by God, directly signifies the patriarch's transformed destiny and his role as the progenitor of countless descendants, fulfilling God's covenant promise. It represents a shift from a personal, elevated status to a divinely ordained, expansive purpose.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Abram;": This initial clause establishes the historical continuity, presenting the patriarch by his original, well-known name. Within the extensive genealogical list, it serves as a direct and familiar reference point, ensuring the reader correctly identifies the individual. It grounds the subsequent statement in the established historical record, setting the stage for the significant declaration that follows.
  • "the same [is] Abraham.": This declarative statement is the theological crux of the verse, functioning as an emphatic identification. The Hebrew phrase הוּא (hu') translated as "the same [is]," asserts that the individual known as Abram is indeed the very same person who received the transformed name and, with it, a transformed destiny. This highlights the divine act of renaming as a definitive and irreversible shift, marking the transition from an "exalted father" to the "father of a multitude." It signifies the fulfillment of God's covenant promises and the establishment of a new identity rooted in divine purpose, emphasizing that God's plan for Abram was not merely a change of title but a profound redefinition of his very being and role in salvation history.

Literary Devices

The brevity and directness of 1 Chronicles 1:27 employ Conciseness to achieve maximum impact. By distilling a complex theological event—the divine renaming and covenant establishment—into a mere five words, the Chronicler highlights its paramount importance without dwelling on narrative details already known from Genesis. The phrase "the same [is]" functions as a powerful form of Emphasis and Identification, drawing the reader's attention to this specific entry in the long genealogy. It is a deliberate pause in the rapid succession of names, signaling a moment of profound theological significance. Furthermore, the name change itself is a profound Symbolism. The transformation from "Abram" to "Abraham" is not just a linguistic shift but a symbolic representation of a new identity, a new covenant, and a new destiny divinely appointed by God. It symbolizes God's transformative power and His unwavering faithfulness to His promises, making Abraham a foundational symbol for the entire nation of Israel and indeed, for all who would later be called God's people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The concise declaration in 1 Chronicles 1:27 is a powerful theological statement about God's sovereign power to initiate and fulfill His covenant promises. It underscores that identity is not merely inherited but can be divinely redefined for a specific purpose. Abraham's renaming is a testament to God's faithfulness, demonstrating that what He promises, He brings to pass, even when human circumstances seem to contradict it. This act of renaming also establishes the foundational nature of Abraham's faith and the covenant made with him, which becomes the bedrock for Israel's identity and their relationship with God. It foreshadows God's ongoing work of transformation in the lives of His people, aligning their identity with His divine purposes and demonstrating His unwavering commitment to His redemptive plan across generations.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

1 Chronicles 1:27, though nestled in a genealogy, offers profound insights for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God is a God of transformation, capable of taking our existing identity and redefining it for His glorious purposes, just as He did with Abram. This verse calls us to consider how God might be calling us to embrace a new identity, perhaps shedding old ways or self-perceptions that do not align with His divine plan for our lives. It reinforces the unwavering faithfulness of God to His covenant promises, assuring us that His word is trustworthy and His purposes will be fulfilled, even across generations and through seemingly insurmountable obstacles. Our true identity and destiny are found not in our own strength or lineage, but in our relationship with God and our participation in His grand redemptive narrative, walking by faith as Abraham did. This transformation is an invitation to trust God's redefinition of who we are and what we are called to be, finding our ultimate purpose in Him.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's renaming of Abram to Abraham speak to His transformative power in our lives today?
  • In what ways does this verse reinforce the reliability and enduring nature of God's covenant promises?
  • What does it mean for us to embrace a new identity in Christ, similar to how Abram embraced his new identity as Abraham?

FAQ

Why is this brief statement included in a genealogy?

Answer: This brief statement is included in the genealogy not merely as a historical note, but as a profound theological marker. The Chronicler, writing for a post-exilic community, emphasizes the unbroken lineage of God's people and the foundational nature of God's covenant with Abraham. By highlighting the name change, the Chronicler draws attention to the pivotal moment when God redefined Abram's identity and destiny, transforming him into the "father of a multitude." This underscores God's sovereign hand in history and His faithfulness to His promises, reminding the audience that their identity and future are securely rooted in God's covenant with Abraham, which is detailed throughout Genesis 17. It is a concise theological summary within a list of names, signifying Abraham's unique and indispensable role in salvation history.

What is the significance of the Hebrew letter 'heh' (ה) in Abraham's new name?

Answer: While the specific etymological details are not explicitly stated in the provided Strong's data, the transformation of Abram (אברם) to Abraham (אברהם) by the addition of the Hebrew letter 'heh' (ה) is widely understood in biblical scholarship to carry significant theological weight. In Hebrew thought, 'heh' is often associated with breath, life, and divine revelation or presence. Its inclusion in Abraham's name is understood to signify a divine infusion of life and fruitfulness, enabling him to become the "father of a multitude" as God promised in Genesis 17:5. This small linguistic change powerfully symbolizes the divine breath of life and blessing that empowers Abraham to fulfill his covenantal destiny, transforming a man who was initially childless into the progenitor of countless descendants, both physical and spiritual.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The transformation of Abram to Abraham, the "father of a multitude," finds its ultimate Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While Abraham became the physical father of the nation of Israel, the New Testament reveals that the true "seed" of Abraham, through whom all nations would be blessed, is Christ Himself, as powerfully articulated in Galatians 3:16. Through faith in Jesus, both Jews and Gentiles become spiritual descendants of Abraham, inheriting the promises made to him not by physical lineage or works of the law, but by grace through faith, as explained in Romans 4:11-12. The divine act of renaming Abram foreshadows the radical new identity believers receive in Christ, where "if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new" (2 Corinthians 5:17). Thus, the promises to Abraham, including the promise of a multitude, are ultimately realized in the vast, multi-ethnic family of God gathered through Christ, in whom all of God's promises are "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20), demonstrating God's faithfulness to His covenant through His Son.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 1 verses 1–27

This paragraph has Adam for its first word and Abraham for its last. Between the creation of the former and the birth of the latter were 2000 years, almost the one-half of which time Adam himself lived. Adam was the common father of our flesh, Abraham the common father of the faithful. By the breach which the former made of the covenant of innocency, we were all made miserable; by the covenant of grace made with the latter, we all are, or may be, made happy. We all are, by nature, the seed of Adam, branches of that wild olive. Let us see to it that, by faith, we become the seed of Abraham (Rom 4:11, Rom 4:12), that we be grafted into the good olive and partake of its root and fatness.

I. The first four verses of this paragraph, and the last four, which are linked together by Shem (Ch1 1:4, Ch1 1:24), contain the sacred line of Christ from Adam to Abraham, and are inserted in his pedigree, Luk 3:34-38, the order ascending as here it descends. This genealogy proves the falsehood of that reproach, As for this man, we know not whence he is. Bishop Patrick well observes here that, a genealogy being to be drawn of the families of the Jews, this appears as the peculiar glory of the Jewish nation, that they alone were able to derive their pedigree from the first man that God created, which no other nation pretended to, but abused themselves and their posterity with fabulous accounts of their originals, the Arcadians fancying that they were before the moon, the people of Thessaly that they sprang from stones, the Athenians that they grew out of the earth, much like the vain imaginations which some of the philosophers had of the origin of the universe. The account which the holy scripture gives both of the creation of the world and of the rise of nations carries with it as clear evidences of its own truth as those idle traditions do of their own vanity and falsehood.

II. All the verses between repeat the account of the replenishing of the earth by the sons of Noah after the flood. 1. The historian begins with those who were strangers to the church, the sons of Japhet, who were planted in the isles of the Gentiles, those western parts of the world, the countries of Europe. Of these he gives a short account (Ch1 1:5-7), because with these the Jews had hitherto had little or no dealings. 2. He proceeds to those who had many of them been enemies to the church, the sons of Ham, who moved southward towards Africa and those parts of Asia which lay that way. Nimrod the son of Cush began to be an oppressor, probably to the people of God in his time. But Mizraim, from whom came the Egyptians, and Canaan, from whom came the Canaanites, are both of them names of great note in the Jewish story; for with their descendants the Israel of God had severe struggles to get out of the land of Egypt and into the land of Canaan; and therefore the branches of Mizraim are particularly recorded (Ch1 1:11, Ch1 1:12), and of Canaan, Ch1 1:13-16. See at what a rate God valued Israel when he gave Egypt for their ransom (Isa 43:3), and cast out all these nations before them, Psa 80:8. 3. He then gives an account of those that were the ancestors and allies of the church, the posterity of Shem, Ch1 1:17-23. These peopled Asia, and spread themselves eastward. The Assyrians, Syrians, Chaldeans, Persians, and Arabians, descended from these. At first the originals of the respective nations were known; but at this day, we have reason to think, the nations are so mingled with one another, by the enlargement of commerce and dominion, the transplanting of colonies, the carrying away of captives, and many other circumstances, that no one nation, no, nor the greatest part of any, is descended entire from any one of these fountains. Only this we are sure of, that God has created of one blood all nations of men; they have all descended from one Adam, one Noah. Have we not all one father? Has not one God created us? Mal 2:10. Our register hastens to the line of Abraham, breaking off abruptly from all the other families of the sons of Noah but that of Arphaxad, from whom Christ was to come. The great promise of the Messiah (says bishop Patrick) was translated from Adam to Seth, from him to Shem, from him to Eber, and so to the Hebrew nation, who were entrusted, above all nations, with that sacred treasure, till the promise was performed and the Messiah had come, and then that nation was made not a people.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–27. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 1:27 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.