Skip to content

Mark 3:4

“Healing on the Sabbath Day”Mark 3:1–6

King James Version
And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil? to save life, or to kill? But they held their peace.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 he saith G3004 unto them G846, Is it lawful G1832 to do good G15 on the sabbath days G4521, or G2228 to do evil G2554? to save G4982 life G5590, or G2228 to kill G615? But G1161 they held their peace G4623.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
And He asked them, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to destroy it?” But they were silent.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And he saith unto them, Is it lawful on the sabbath day to do good, or to do harm? to save a life, or to kill? But they held their peace.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
He said to them, “Is it lawful on the Sabbath day to do good, or to do harm? To save a life, or to kill?” But they were silent.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
And he saide to them, Is it lawfull to doe a good deede on the Sabbath day, or to doe euil? to saue the life, or to kill? But they held their peace.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
And he saith to them, `Is it lawful on the sabbaths to do good, or to do evil? life to save, or to kill?' but they were silent.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
17 Greek words
  1. καὶkaiAndG2532CONJConjunction
  2. λέγειlegeiHe saysG3004V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  3. αὐτοῖς·autoisto themG846P-DPMPersonal pronoun Dative Plural Masculine
  4. ἔξεστινexestinIs it lawfulG1832V-PAI-3SVerb Present Active Indicative 3rd Singular
  5. τοῖςtoison theG3588T-DPNDefinite article Dative Plural Neuter
  6. σάββασινsabbasinSabbathsG4521N-DPNNoun Dative Plural Neuter
  7. ἀγαθὸνagathongoodG18A-ASNAdjective Accusative Singular Neuter
  8. ποιῆσαιpoiēsaito doG4160V-AANVerb Aorist Active Infinitive
  9. ἢēorG2228CONJConjunction
  10. κακοποιῆσαιkakopoiēsaito do evil?G2554V-AANVerb Aorist Active Infinitive
  11. ψυχὴνpsuchēnLifeG5590N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
  12. σῶσαιsōsaito saveG4982V-AANVerb Aorist Active Infinitive
  13. ἢēorG2228CONJConjunction
  14. ἀποκτεῖναι;apokteinaito kill?G615V-AANVerb Aorist Active Infinitive
  15. οἱhoi[the]G3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  16. δὲdeButG1161CONJConjunction
  17. ἐσιώπωνesiōpōnthey were silentG4623V-IAI-3PVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Plural
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
In the KJVVerse 24,293 of 31,102 · 78.1%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Jesus asks whether the Sabbath is for doing good or evil, for saving life or killing, and his opponents hold their peace.

“And he saith unto them,”

Jesus now turns to the watchers and puts the question to them.

“Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil?”

éxesti, “is it permitted”. The choice is between doing good and doing evil, and the Sabbath belongs to the good.

“to save life, or to kill?”

To withhold help from a man who can be restored falls on the side of harm. By verse 6 his questioners are plotting to kill.

“But they held their peace.”

They were silent (siōpáō), because either answer would have condemned them.

Passage studyMark 3:1–6

Jesus Heals the Withered Hand on the Sabbath

1And he entered again into the synagogue; and there was a man there which had a withered hand. 2And they watched him, whether he would heal him on the sabbath day; that they might accuse him. 3And he saith unto the man which had the withered hand, Stand forth. 4And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil? to save life, or to kill? But they held their peace. 5And when he had looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts, he saith unto the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched it out: and his hand was restored whole as the other. 6And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him.

Summary

On a Sabbath Jesus goes again into the synagogue, where a man with a withered hand is present and Jesus’ opponents are watching to see whether he will heal him, so that they can accuse him. Jesus calls the man into the middle of the room and asks whether the Sabbath is a day for doing good or evil, for saving life or killing. They hold their peace. Looking round on them with anger, grieved at the hardness of their hearts, he tells the man to stretch out his hand, and it is made whole. The Pharisees go out at once and plan with the Herodians how to destroy him. In six verses we see the Lord of the Sabbath using his own day to restore a man, and we see the first plot against his life.

A Sabbath healing after the Sabbath dispute

This scene follows straight on from a Sabbath in the grainfields, when the disciples were criticised for plucking grain (Mark 2:23–28). Jesus closed that dispute by saying, “The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath: Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath” (Mark 2:27–28). Mark now moves from words about the Sabbath to an act on the Sabbath, and the conflict sharpens. Through chapter 2 the opposition had been growing, with objections over his forgiving sins (Mark 2:1–12), over fasting (Mark 2:18–22) and over the grain. Here it becomes a plan to kill him.

“And he entered again into the synagogue.” The verb eisérchomai is the ordinary word for going in, and pálin means “again”. Mark has already shown Jesus teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum (Mark 1:21) and preaching in synagogues throughout Galilee (Mark 1:39), so this is his custom, and he keeps it while the opposition grows. The synagogue was the centre of Jewish community life, where people gathered to worship, to hear the Scriptures taught and to discuss the law. Whatever happened there happened in front of everyone.

The Sabbath and the rules built around it

God commanded the Sabbath in the ten commandments as a day of rest, kept in memory of his own rest after the six days of creation (Exodus 20:8–11), and he gave it to Israel as a sign of his covenant (Exodus 31:16–17). Over the centuries teachers built a large body of oral tradition, often called halakha, defining in detail what counted as work. The Pharisees were zealous guardians of that tradition. Under its rules healing was work, and so it was forbidden on the Sabbath unless a life was in immediate danger. This man’s life was safe, so on their reckoning his healing could wait until the Sabbath was over.

The man with the withered hand

Mark describes the hand with xēraínō, a verb meaning to dry up or shrivel. The hand, cheír, is the man’s own hand, shrunken and useless, probably from some kind of wasting or paralysis. A man works with his hands, so he would have struggled to earn a living by manual labour, and in a society that often linked a sound body with God’s favour he was easily overlooked. Mark gives him no name and no words. He is simply there, and his need is plain to see.

Watching him in order to accuse him

“And they watched him, whether he would heal him on the sabbath day; that they might accuse him.” Mark names the watchers in verse 6 as the Pharisees. The verb paratēréō means to watch closely, and here the close watching carries evil intent, the look of someone waiting for a slip. They watch to see whether (ei) he will heal. The verb for healing, therapeúō, can mean to serve or wait upon someone, and here it means to cure a disease. Their purpose is to accuse him, katēgoréō, which means to bring a charge as a plaintiff does. They were gathering evidence for a formal case.

There is a sharp irony in the scene. These men are in the house of worship on the day set apart for God, standing before the Lord of the Sabbath, and they are hoping for grounds to condemn an act of mercy. Their watching also gives something away. They expect him to heal, because they already know that compassion is what he shows. The Gospels record other Sabbath healings done under hostile eyes (Luke 13:10–17, Luke 14:1–6), and one in John’s Gospel brought open persecution (John 5:16–18). Matthew sets this same healing straight after the dispute in the grainfields (Matthew 12:1–8), and Matthew and Luke both tell it (Matthew 12:9–14, Luke 6:6–11).

Why Jesus called the man into the midst

Jesus takes the first step, before the man has asked for anything. “And he saith unto the man which had the withered hand, Stand forth.” The verb “saith” is légō, the common word for speaking. “Stand forth” renders a Greek phrase that reads literally “rise into the midst”, egeírō eis to méson. The verb egeírō means to rise or wake up, and its passive is used when Christ is raised by God. eis means “into”, and mésos means “middle” or “midst”. The man is to get up and come into the centre of the synagogue, where everyone can see him and his hand.

By doing this Jesus brings the whole matter into the open. The man’s need is set before every eye, the Pharisees’ included, and they have to face what Jesus is about to do. They had been watching quietly, and he answers them in public, knowing exactly what they intend. For the man it was an act of trust to rise and stand in the middle of the gathering, under the eyes of the religious leaders, with the hand everyone could now see.

Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days?

Jesus’ question shows that the Sabbath is a day for doing good and for saving life. “Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil? to save life, or to kill?” The word for lawful, éxesti, means “it is permitted” or “it is lawful” under whatever law is in view, and here the question is what God’s law allows on God’s day. The verb for doing good, agathopoiéō, is related to agathopoiós, “a well-doer”, and means to do good to someone, to act with kindness. Jesus asks his question in the presence of a man he is able to heal, so it applies at once.

The question offers two roads, and every hearer knows which one is right. Set side by side, the choices put a refusal to save in the same column as harm. When a man can be restored today and the rule-keepers want him left as he is for the sake of their tradition, they have turned a day of blessing into a burden. The words have a further edge, because before Mark’s account closes, the men who object to healing on the Sabbath are planning a killing. This is the heart of the mercy God asks for in Hosea 6:6 and Matthew 9:13, and it fits the Sabbath Jesus described, made for man (Mark 2:27).

Why did they hold their peace?

They held their peace because any answer would have condemned them. siōpáō means to be silent. To say it was lawful to do good would approve what Jesus was about to do and undercut their rule and their authority. To say it was lawful to do evil was unthinkable. Silence was the only way left to them, and it exposed them. Mark goes on to name what lay behind it, the hardness of their hearts.

Anger and grief together

“And when he had looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts”. To look round about, periblépō, is a searching gaze that takes in everyone present. The word for anger, orgḗ, means wrath or indignation, and it can describe a justified abhorrence of evil. The verb for being grieved, syllypéō, means to be grieved with someone or to sorrow on account of them. Hardness, pṓrōsis, means callousness, and it was used of a callus or of something turned to stone. The heart, kardía, is the seat of a person’s thinking and will, and theirs had grown a callus. It left them unfeeling toward the man and blind to the work of God taking place in front of them.

Why was Jesus angry and grieved at the same time?

Jesus was angry at what these men were doing and grieved over what they had become. His anger was holy displeasure at men who watched to condemn an act of mercy and who would have left a man in his suffering sooner than give up their reading of the law. His grief was sorrow for those same men, whose hearts were too hard to receive what God was doing. Both come from one holy character, and in him justice and mercy belong together. The same sorrow sounds in his lament over Jerusalem (Matthew 23:37), and the letter to the Hebrews warns God’s people against this very hardening of heart (Hebrews 3:7–19). His anger also kept its aim, because his next words heal the man.

“Stretch forth thine hand”

“He saith unto the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched it out: and his hand was restored whole as the other.” The verb ekteínō means to stretch out. Jesus heals by his word alone, with no touch and no ritual, and so the “work” his opponents meant to charge him with was a word spoken and a hand stretched out. The command asked the man to do the very thing his hand had been unable to do, and he obeyed, trusting the one who spoke.

The healing was immediate and complete. apokathístēmi means to restore. hygiḗs means whole, sound and healthy. “As the other” is állos, simply “other”, his other hand, so the withered hand was now as sound as the one he had always used. Healing like this is what Isaiah promised for the age of the Messiah (Isaiah 35:5–6), and it belongs to the work of the one on whom the Spirit of the Lord rests (Isaiah 61:1–3). It shows the authority of the one Mark introduced in his first line as “Jesus Christ, the Son of God” (Mark 1:1), and it shows the Sabbath used as the Lord of the Sabbath intends it.

The first plot against Jesus’ life

“And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him.” The Pharisees leave the synagogue and act at once. euthéōs means “immediately” or “at once”, and Mark uses it often to carry his account forward. To take counsel, symboúlion poiéō, is to deliberate together and form a plan. The Herodians, Hērōdianoí, were partisans of Herod’s house, loyal especially to Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea. They were generally pro-Roman and held real political influence. The verb apóllymi means to destroy fully, to perish or to lose, and here it means to put Jesus to death.

This is the turning point of the opening chapters. Questions and criticism have become a plot to kill. Later Jesus himself foretells his rejection and death (Mark 8:31), and the council in Jerusalem will make the same decision (John 11:47–53). The second psalm speaks of rulers who take counsel together against the LORD and his anointed (Psalm 2:1–2), and after the resurrection the apostles praise God because the gathering of Herod, Pilate and the rest against Jesus carried out what God had already determined (Acts 4:27–28).

Why did the Pharisees join with the Herodians?

The Pharisees and the Herodians joined together because they both saw Jesus as a threat to their own standing. The two groups were usually far apart. The Pharisees were strict about the law and its traditions, and the Herodians served a dynasty that ruled with Rome’s backing. For the Pharisees, Jesus’ disregard of their traditions, especially about the Sabbath, and his growing popularity undermined their religious authority. For the Herodians, a growing movement that spoke of a coming kingdom could look like the start of an uprising that might unsettle Herod’s rule or bring in Rome. A common enemy made allies of them.

Christ the Lord of the Sabbath who restores

This healing is a small picture of the whole work of Christ. He is the Lord of the Sabbath (Mark 2:28), and the rest the Sabbath pointed to is found in him, who calls the weary to come to him and promises rest for their souls (Matthew 11:28–30). Paul speaks of the Sabbath as a shadow of things to come, and of Christ as its substance (Colossians 2:16–17).

The man’s withered hand also pictures what sin does to us. Scripture says that “there is none that doeth good, no, not one” (Romans 3:10–12), and it describes us as dead in sins until God makes us alive together with Christ (Ephesians 2:1–5, Colossians 2:13–14). The question of verse 4 asked who would do good, and Christ restores people so that they can do good and bear fruit in him (John 15:5). The hardness of heart he grieved over is what God promised to remove, taking away the stony heart and giving a heart of flesh (Ezekiel 36:26). Through Christ God reconciles all things to himself (Colossians 1:19–20).

Jesus asked whether it was lawful to save life or to kill, and the men who refused to answer went out to plan his death. He knew where their counsel led, and he went on with his work. He is the good shepherd who lays down his life for the sheep (John 10:11), who came to give his life a ransom for many (Mark 10:45), and the servant of Isaiah who was brought to the slaughter like a lamb (Isaiah 53:7). Men plotted to destroy him, and through that death God gave what John describes: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16). The word he uses for “perish” there is the same apóllymi used of the plot in verse 6.

What this Sabbath shows us of Christ

On this Sabbath Jesus noticed a man nobody else was thinking about except as a test case, and he made that man the centre of the room. His word asked for something the man could not do and gave the strength to do it. His anger at hard hearts and his grief over them came together, and both were for the sake of people. God’s day, in his hands, is a day for doing good and for saving life.

The passage also shows that the Lord who healed was willing to face what it cost. The plot of verse 6 led at last to the cross, where the one they set out to destroy gave his life for those who opposed him. The hand stretched out at his command is a sign of what he still does, bringing people from weakness into wholeness on the day he calls his own.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Mark 3:1–12. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 12 verses
Passage under commentMark 3:1–12
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Here, as before, we have our Lord Jesus busy at work in the synagogue first, and then by the sea side; to teach us that his presence should not be confined either to the one or to the other, but, wherever any are gathered together in his name, whether in the synagogue or any where else, there is he in the midst of them. In every place where he records his name, he will meet his people, and bless them; it is his will that men pray every where. Now here we have some account of what he did.

I.When he entered again into the synagogue, he improved the opportunity he had there, of doing good, and having, no doubt, preached a sermon there, he wrought a miracle for the confirmation of it, or at least for the confirmation of this truth - that it is lawful to do good on the sabbath day. We had the narrative, Matthew 12:9.

1.The patient's case was piteous; he had a withered hand, by which he was disabled to work for his living; and those that are so, are the most proper objects of charity; let those be helped that cannot help themselves.

2.The spectators were very unkind, both to the patient and to the Physician; instead of interceding for a poor neighbour, they did what they could to hinder his cure: for they intimated that if Christ cured him now on the sabbath day, they would accuse him as a Sabbath breaker. It had been very unreasonable, if they should have opposed a physician or surgeon in helping any poor body in misery, by ordinary methods; but much more absurd was it to oppose him that cured without any labour, but by a word's speaking.

3.Christ dealt very fairly with the spectators, and dealt with them first, if possible to prevent the offence.

(1.)He laboured to convince their judgment. He bade the man stand forth (Mark 3:3), that by the sight of him they might be moved with compassion toward him, and might not, for shame, account his cure a crime. And then he appeals to their own consciences; though the thing speaks itself, yet he is pleased to speak it; "Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, as I design to do, or to do evil, as you design to do? Whether is better, to save life or to kill?" What fairer question could be put? And yet, because they saw it would turn against them, they held their peace. Note, Those are obstinate indeed in their infidelity, who, when they can say nothing against a truth, will say nothing to it; and, when they cannot resist, yet will not yield.

(2.)When they rebelled against the light, he lamented their stubbornness (Mark 3:5); He looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts. The sin he had an eye to, was, the hardness of their hearts, their insensibleness of the evidence of his miracles, and their inflexible resolution to persist in unbelief. We hear what is said amiss, and see what is done amiss; but Christ looks at the root of bitterness in the heart, the blindness and hardness of that. Observe,

[1.]How he was provoked by the sin; he looked round upon them; for they were so many, and had so placed themselves, that they surrounded him: and he looked with anger; his anger, it is probable, appeared in his countenance; his anger was, like God's, without the least perturbation to himself, but not without great provocation from us. Note, The sin of sinners is very displeasing to Jesus Christ; and the way to be angry, and not to sin, is it be angry, as Christ was, at nothing but sin. Let hard-hearted sinners tremble to think of the anger with which he will look round upon them shortly, when the great day of his wrath comes.

[2.]How he pitied the sinners; he was grieved for the hardness of their hearts; as God was grieved forty years for the hardness of the hearts of their fathers in the wilderness. Note, It is a great grief to our Lord Jesus, to see sinners bent upon their own ruin, and obstinately set against the methods of their conviction and recovery, for he would not that any should perish. This is a good reason why the hardness of our own hearts and of the hearts of others, should be a grief to us.

4.Christ dealt very kindly with the patient; he bade him stretch forth his hand, and it was immediately restored. Now,

(1.)Christ has hereby taught us to go on with resolution in the way of our duty, how violent soever the opposition is, that we meet with in it. We must deny ourselves sometimes in our ease, pleasure, and convenience, rather than give offence even to those who causelessly take it; but we must not deny ourselves the satisfaction of serving God, and doing good, though offence may unjustly be taken at it. None could be more tender of giving offence than Christ; yet, rather than send this poor man away uncured, he would venture offending all the scribes and Pharisees that compassed him about.

(2.)He hath hereby given us a specimen of the cures wrought by his grace upon poor souls; our hands are spiritually withered, the powers of our souls weakened by sin, and disabled for that which is good. The great healing day is the sabbath, and the healing place the synagogue; the healing power is that of Christ. The gospel command is like this recorded here; and the command is rational and just; though our hands are withered, and we cannot of ourselves stretch them forth, we must attempt it, must, as well as we can, lift them up to God in prayer, lay hold on Christ and eternal life, and employ them in good works; and if we do our endeavour, power goes along with the word of Christ, he effects the cure. Though our hands be withered, yet, if we will not offer to stretch them out, it is our own fault that we are not healed; but if we do, and are healed, Christ and his power and grace must have all the glory.

5.The enemies of Christ dealt very barbarously with him. Such a work of mercy should have engaged their love to him, and such a work of wonder their faith in him. But, instead of that, the Pharisees, who pretended to be oracles in the church, and the Herodians, who pretended to be the supporters of the state, though of opposite interests one to another, took counsel together against him, how they might destroy him. Note, They that suffer for doing good, do but suffer as their Master did.

II.When he withdrew to the sea, he did good there.

While his enemies sought to destroy him, he quitted the place; to teach us in troublous times to shift for our own safety; but see here,

1.How he was followed into his retirement. When some had such an enmity to him, that they drove him out of their country, others had such a value for him, that they followed him wherever he went; and the enmity of their leaders to Christ did not cool their respect to him. Great multitudes followed him from all parts of the nation; as far north, as from Galilee; as far south, as from Judea and Jerusalem; nay, and from Idumea; as far east, as from beyond Jordan; and west, as from about Tyre and Sidon, Mark 3:7, Mark 3:8. Observe,

(1.)What induced them to follow him; it was the report they heard of the great things he did for all that applied themselves to him; some wished to see one that had done such great things, and others hoped he would do great things for them. Note, The consideration of the great things Christ has done, should engage us to come to him.

(2.)What they followed him for (Mark 3:10); They pressed upon him, to touch him, as many as had plagues. Diseases are here called plagues, mastigas - corrections, chastisements; so they are designed to be, to make us smart for our sins, that thereby we may be made sorry for them, and may be warned not to return to them. Those that were under these scourgings came to Jesus; this is the errand on which sickness is sent, to quicken us to enquire after Christ, and apply ourselves to him as our Physician. They pressed upon him, each striving which should get nearest to him, and which should be first served. They fell down before him (so Dr. Hammond), as petitioners for his favour; they desired leave but to touch him, having faith to be healed, not only by his touching them, but by their touching him; which no doubt they had many instances of.

(3.)What provision he made to be ready to attend them (Mark 3:9); He spoke to his disciples, who were fishermen, and had fisher-boats at command, that a small ship should constantly wait on him, to carry him from place to place on the same coast; that, when he had despatched the necessary business he had to do in one place, he might easily remove to another, where his presence was requisite, without pressing through the crowds of people that followed him for curiosity. Wise men, as much as they can, decline a crowd.

2.What abundance of good he did in his retirement. He did not withdraw to be idle, nor did he send back those who rudely crowded after him when he withdrew, but took it kindly, and gave them what they came for; for he never said to any that sought him diligently, Seek ye me in vain.

(1.)Diseases were effectually cured; He healed many; divers sorts of patients, ill of divers sorts of diseases; though numerous, though various, he healed them.

(2.)Devils were effectually conquered; those whom unclean spirits had got possession of, when they saw him, trembled at his presence, and they also fell down before him, not to supplicate his favour, but to deprecate his wrath, and by their own terrors were compelled to own that he was the Son of God, Mark 3:11. It is sad that this great truth should be denied by any of the children of men, who may have the benefit of it, when a confession of it has so often been extorted from devils, who are excluded from having benefit by it.

(3.)Christ sought not applause to himself in doing those great things, for he strictly charged those for whom he did them, that they should not make him known (Mark 3:12); that they should not be industrious to spread the notice of his cures, as it were by advertisements in the newspapers, but let them leave his own works to praise him, and let the report of them diffuse itself, and make its own way. Let not those that are cured, be forward to divulge it, lest it should feed their pride who are so highly favoured; but let the standers-by carry away the intelligence of it. When we do that which is praiseworthy, and yet covet not to be praised of men for it, then the same mind is in us, which was in Christ Jesus.

Historical interpretation

Seven Centuries of Reception

7 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

7 quotes · AD 373–1107
Post-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
40050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Pseudo-Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274SourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Or else it means the avaricious, who, being able to give had rather receive, and love robbery rather than making gifts. And they are commanded to stretch forth their hands, that is, let him that stole steal no more, but rather let him labour, working with his hand the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth. (Eph. 4:28)
d. AD 373Athanasius of AlexandriaPost-NiceneSourceHOMILIES 28
In the synagogue of the Jews was a man who had a withered hand. If he was withered in his hand, the ones who stood by were withered in their minds. And they were not looking at the crippled man nor were they expecting the miraculous deed of the one who was about to work. But before doing the work, the Savior ploughed up their minds with words. For knowing the evil of the mind and its bitter depth, he first softened them up in advance with words so as to tame the wildness of their understanding, asking: “Is it permitted to do good on the sabbath or to do evil; to save a life or to destroy one?” For if he had said to them, “Is it permitted to work?” immediately they would have said, “You are speaking contrary to the law.” Then he told them what was intended by the law, for he spoke as the One who established the laws concerning the sabbath, adding, “except this: that which will be done for the sake of a life.” Again if a person falls into a hole on a sabbath, Jews are permitted to pull the person out. This not only applies to a person, but also an ox or a donkey. In this way the law agrees that things relating to preservation may be done, hence Jews prepare meals on the sabbath. Then he asked them about a point on which they could hardly disagree: “Is it permitted to do good?” But they did not even so much as say, “Yes,” because by then they were not in a good temper.
d. AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceMATTHEW, HOMILY 40.1
Jesus said to the man with the withered hand, “Come here.” Then he challenged the Pharisees as to whether it would be lawful to do good on the sabbath. Note the tender compassion of the Lord when he deliberately brought the man with the withered hand right into their presence. He hoped that the mere sight of the misfortune might soften them, that they might become a little less spiteful by seeing the affliction, and perhaps out of sorrow mend their own ways. But they remained callous and unfeeling. They preferred to do harm to the name of Christ than to see this poor man made whole. They betrayed their wickedness not only by their hostility to Christ, but also by their doing so with such contentiousness that they treated with disdain his mercies to others. GOSPEL OF ST.
d. AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Con. Evan. ii. 35) But some one may wonder how Matthew could have said, that they themselves asked the Lord, if it was lawful to heal on the sabbath-day; when Mark rather relates that they were asked by our Lord, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath-day, or to do evil? Therefore we must understand that they first asked the Lord, if it was lawful to heal on the sabbath-day, then that understanding their thoughts, and that they were seeking an opportunity to accuse Him, He placed in the middle him whom He was about to cure, and put those questions, which Mark and Luke relate. We must then suppose, that when they were silent, He propounded the parable of the sheep, and concluded, that it was lawful to do good on the sabbath-day. It goes on: But they were silent.
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Vict. Ant. e Cat. in Marc. v. Chrys. Hom. in Matt. 40) He placed him in the midst, that they might be frightened at the sight, and on seeing him compassionate him, and lay aside their malice.

(Vict. Ant. e Cat, in Marc.) For they knew that He would certainly cure him. It goes on: And looking round about upon them with anger. His looking round upon them in anger, and being saddened at the blindness of their hearts, is fitting for His humanity, which He deigned to take upon Himself for us. He connects the working of the miracle with a word, which proves that the man is cured by His voice alone. It follows therefore, And he stretched it out, and his hand was restored. Answering by all these things for His disciples, and at the same time showing that His life is above the law.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in Marc. i. 14) For, since He had defended the breaking of the sabbath, which they objected to His disciples, by an approved example, now they wish, by watching Him, to calumniate Himself, that they might accuse Him of a transgression, if He cured on the sabbath, of cruelty or of folly, if He refused. It goes on: And he saith unto the man which had the withered hand, Stand in the midst.

(ubi sup.) And anticipating the calumny of the Jews, which they had prepared for Him, He accused them of violating the precepts of the law, by a wrong interpretation. Wherefore there follows: And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath-day, or to do evil? And this He asks, because they thought that on the sabbath they were to rest even from good works, whilst the law commands to abstain from bad, saying, Ye shall do no servile work therein; (Levit. 23:7) that is, sin: for Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. (John 8:34) What He first says, to do good on the sabbath-day or to do evil, is the same as what He afterwards adds, to save a life or to lose it; that is, to cure a man or not. Not that God, Who is in the highest degree good, can be the author of perdition to us, but that His not saving is in the language of Scripture to destroy. But if it be asked, wherefore the Lord, being about to cure the body, asked about the saving of the soul, let him understand either that in the common way of Scripture the soul is put for the man; as it is said, All the souls that came out of the loins of Jacob; (Exodus 1:5) or because he did those miracles for the saving of a soul, or because the healing itself of the hand signified the saving of the soul.

(ubi sup.) But mystically, the man with a withered hand shows the human race, dried up as to its fruitfulness in good works, but now cured by the mercy of the Lord; the hand of man, which in our first parent had been dried up when he plucked the fruit of the forbidden tree, through the grace of the Redeemer, Who stretched His guiltless hands on the tree of the cross, has been restored to health by the juices of good works. Well too was it in the synagogue that the hand was withered; for where the gift of knowledge is greater, there also the danger of inexcusable guilt is greater.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
After confounding the Jews, who had blamed His disciples, for pulling the ears of corn on the sabbath day, by the example of David, the Lord now further bringing them to the truth, works a miracle on the sabbath; showing that, if it is a pious deed to work miracles on the sabbath for the health of men, it is not wrong to do on the sabbath things necessary for the body: he says therefore, And he entered again into the synagogue; and there was a man there which had a withered hand. And they watched him, whether he would heal him on the sabbath-day; that they might accuse him.

Or, he has his right hand withered, who does not the works which belong to the right side; for from the time that our hand is employed in forbidden deeds, from that time it is withered to the working of good. But it will be restored whenever it stands firm in virtue; wherefore Christ saith, Arise, that is, from sin, and stand in the midst; that thus it may stretch itself forth neither too little or too much.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Mark 3:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8