Skip to content

Luke 1:4

“Luke's Purpose and Prologue”Luke 1:1–4

King James Version
That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
That G2443 thou mightest know G1921 the certainty G803 of G4012 those things G3056, wherein G3739 thou hast been instructed G2727.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
that thou mightest know the certainty concerning the things wherein thou wast instructed.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
that you might know the certainty concerning the things in which you were instructed.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
That thou mightest acknowledge the certaintie of those things, whereof thou hast bene instructed.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
that thou mayest know the certainty of the things wherein thou wast instructed.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
8 Greek words
  1. ἵναinaso thatG2443CONJConjunction
  2. ἐπιγνῷςepignōsyou may knowG1921V-2AAS-2SVerb 2nd Aorist Active Subjunctive 2nd Singular
  3. περὶpericoncerningG4012PREPPreposition
  4. ὧνhōnwhichG3739R-GPMRelative pronoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  5. κατηχήθηςkatēchēthēsyou were instructedG2727V-API-2SVerb Aorist Passive Indicative 2nd Singular
  6. λόγωνlogōn[of the] thingsG3056N-GPMNoun Genitive Plural Masculine
  7. τὴνtēntheG3588T-ASFDefinite article Accusative Singular Feminine
  8. ἀσφάλειανasphaleiancertaintyG803N-ASFNoun Accusative Singular Feminine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Levant)
All Luke Sites (Levant) View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,898 of 31,102 · 80.1%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Luke writes so that Theophilus can know for certain that what he had already been taught about Jesus is true.

“That thou mightest know”

hina introduces the purpose of the whole prologue, full and settled knowledge (epiginṓskō).

“the certainty of those things,”

Firm and secure ground (aspháleia) concerning the matters (lógos) Luke is about to tell.

“wherein thou hast been instructed.”

Theophilus had already been taught by word of mouth (katēchéō), and Luke’s book confirms that teaching in writing.

Passage studyLuke 1:1–4

Written That You May Know the Certainty

1Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us, 2Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word; 3It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus, 4That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed.

Summary

Luke opens his Gospel by telling us how he wrote it and why. Many had already written accounts of the things the church believed about Jesus, and those accounts came from people who had seen the events from the beginning and then served the word by preaching it. Luke traced everything carefully from the very start and wrote it out in order for a man named Theophilus, so that he could know for certain that what he had been taught was true. In these four verses we learn that our faith rests on things that really happened, handed down by those who saw them, and that God has given us this Gospel so that we may be sure of them.

Why Luke begins with a formal prologue

Luke begins the way the historians of the Greek world began their books, with a formal prologue that states the writer’s purpose and method and names the person he is writing for. Educated readers of his day would have recognised it at once. Their historians researched widely, spoke with eyewitnesses and consulted earlier records, and they said so at the start of their works. Luke uses this familiar form to tell Theophilus, and the wider Gentile readership that would read with him, that what follows is a carefully researched account of real events. Of the four Gospel writers, Luke alone opens by describing how he gathered his material.

The prologue also stands over a second book. Luke writes to the same Theophilus at the start of Acts: “The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach” (Acts 1:1). There he goes on to tell how the risen Jesus “shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs” (Acts 1:3). The Gospel and Acts form one continuous account, from the life of Jesus to the spread of the gospel through the early church, and this opening sets the tone for both.

The church has long identified the writer as Luke, the companion of Paul whom Paul calls “Luke, the beloved physician” (Colossians 4:14), and has held that he was a Gentile.

The things most surely believed among us

By the time Luke wrote, “many” had already “taken in hand” to write about Jesus. The Greek verb, epicheiréō, is made of the words for “upon” and “hand”, and it means to put your hand to a task, to undertake it. The earlier writers made a deliberate and purposeful effort, and Luke speaks of it plainly. Accounts and oral teaching about Jesus were circulating among the churches of the first century, and Luke adds his own to them, as the word “also” in verse 3 shows. His careful description of his own method suggests that he aimed to give a fuller and more thoroughly checked account than some of these, though he names none of them and finds fault with none.

What the many set out to do was “to set forth in order a declaration”. The verb behind “set forth in order”, anatássomai, means to arrange things in sequence. The word for declaration, diḗgesis, comes from diēgeomai, “to narrate fully”, and it means a complete narrative told in detail.

The subject of all these accounts is “those things which are most surely believed among us”. The verb here, plērophoréō, joins the words for “full” and “carry”, and it means to bring something to its full measure. It can mean to assure someone completely, and it can mean to carry something out completely. The KJV takes the first sense, things believed with full assurance. Some modern translations take the second and speak of “the things that have been accomplished among us”. Both are true of what Luke records. These events had been fulfilled in history and seen by witnesses, and so the church held them with deep conviction. “Those things” are the life, ministry, death and resurrection of Jesus, which Luke’s Gospel tells from the angels’ announcements at its start to the appearances of the risen Lord at its end (Luke 24:36–49).

“Among us” makes this the shared faith of the whole church. The gospel was held in common from the start, by a community of believers who affirmed it together, and Luke counts himself one of them.

Eyewitnesses and ministers of the word

Verse 2 tells us where those accounts came from. They were “delivered” by people “which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word”. The verb paradídōmi means to hand over or entrust, and it is used for passing teaching carefully from one person to the next, whether by word of mouth or in writing. The message came down by a chain of trust, from those who saw the events to those who received them, and Luke includes himself among the receivers when he says “unto us”.

The word for eyewitnesses, autóptēs (plural autoptai), means “self-seeing”, someone who saw a thing with their own eyes. Greek and Roman historians appealed to eyewitnesses to show that their accounts could be trusted, and for readers in that world such an appeal carried real weight. The apostles wrote in the same way. John speaks of “that which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life” (1 John 1:1–3). Peter writes, “For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty” (2 Peter 1:16).

“From the beginning” most likely means from the start of Jesus’ public ministry, and it may reach back further to take in his whole earthly life. When the apostles chose a man to take the place of Judas, he had to be one of those “which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us”, so that he could be “a witness with us of his resurrection” (Acts 1:21–22). Jesus had told them, “ye shall be witnesses unto me” (Acts 1:8), and they preached as witnesses. On the day of Pentecost Peter told the crowd, “This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses” (Acts 2:32).

These same people were “ministers of the word”. The word hypērétēs is said to have first meant an under-rower, an oarsman on a lower bench of a ship, and it came to mean an assistant, a servant or an officer. The witnesses served the word by proclaiming it, as Jesus sent them to do when he told them to teach all nations (Matthew 28:19–20). Hebrews describes the same chain when it speaks of “so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him” (Hebrews 2:3–4).

“The word” (lógos) is the message about Jesus, his teaching and his works. John uses the same word for Jesus himself: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). The message the witnesses served was the message of the One John calls the Word, so handing it on faithfully was a sacred trust.

Was Luke an eyewitness?

Luke received the account from those who had seen the events, and when he says the eyewitnesses “delivered them unto us”, he places himself among those who received it from others. He was a later companion of Paul and travelled with him on some of his missionary journeys, as when Paul’s company set out for Macedonia (Acts 16:10). Luke’s gift was careful research among those who had been there and the accounts they had given, and verse 3 tells us how thoroughly he did it.

Luke’s careful investigation

“It seemed good to me also” is Luke’s statement of a settled decision. The verb dokéō means to think or to judge, and here it describes the judgment he reached after his research, that this was a good thing to do. The word “also” (kagṓ, “I too”) sets his work alongside the accounts of verse 1. Luke speaks of his own resolve, and we receive what he wrote as God’s word, so his diligence and God’s prompting went together in it.

“Having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first” is the heart of his claim. The verb parakolouthéō means to follow closely beside, and so to trace something out and know it fully. Luke had followed the events closely and traced them from their origin, most likely by speaking with eyewitnesses and consulting existing records. He covered “all things” (pâs), and he went back “from the very first” (ánōthen), to the earliest beginnings of the story. His Gospel accordingly opens with the angels’ announcements.

He then set out “to write unto thee in order”. The verb gráphō is the ordinary word for writing, and kathexēs means “consecutively”, one thing after another. It describes an account arranged in a sequence that makes sense to the reader, and it may also mean the order in which things happened. That order reflects the order of God’s own plan, which unfolds with purpose from the prophecies of the Old Testament, through the life of Jesus, to the spread of the gospel in Acts. Luke arranges his account so that a reader like Theophilus can see how God’s saving work holds together.

Who was most excellent Theophilus?

The name Theóphilos means “friend of God” or “loved by God”. The title “most excellent”, krátistos, was a formal address for people of high rank. A Roman commander writes to “the most excellent governor Felix” (Acts 23:26), and Paul gives Festus the same title when he answers him (Acts 26:25). Theophilus was therefore most likely a man of social or political standing, perhaps a Roman official or a wealthy patron, and men of that rank often sponsored literary works. He may have been a new believer or someone still enquiring, and verse 4 tells us he had already received some teaching.

Luke wrote both of his books to him, and Theophilus stands at the head of the whole account. Yet the care with which Luke wrote shows that he meant it for many more readers, and through it God gives every believer the same firm ground he gave Theophilus. Luke’s Gospel shows God’s salvation reaching all people, the Gentiles included, in the words “A light to lighten the Gentiles” (Luke 2:32).

That thou mightest know the certainty

Verse 4 gives Luke’s purpose. “That” translates hina, the Greek word that introduces a purpose. The verb for “know”, epiginṓskō, means to know by a mark, to recognise, and so to become fully acquainted with something. Luke wants Theophilus to have full and accurate knowledge, a settled grasp of the truth that goes beyond his first instruction.

The word for “certainty”, aspháleia, means security or safety. It describes ground that is firm and safe to stand on. “Those things” translates lógos, here in the sense of matters or accounts, the events and teachings that Luke is about to set out.

Theophilus had already “been instructed”. The verb katēchéō means to sound down into the ears, and so to teach by word of mouth, and it is the root of our word “catechize”. New converts and enquirers in the early church commonly received this kind of oral teaching in the faith. Luke’s written account confirms what Theophilus had heard and deepens it, giving him a lasting record of the truths he had been taught.

Certainty mattered greatly in Luke’s day. The early church faced persecution, disagreements within, and doubt from both Jews and Gentiles, and its teaching was often misrepresented or challenged. A believer who knew that his faith rested on events carefully traced back to those who saw them could stand firm and answer those who opposed it. John states a purpose very close to Luke’s near the end of his Gospel. He tells us that Jesus did “many other signs” beyond those in his book (John 20:30), “But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name” (John 20:31).

Christ at the centre of the account

The “things most surely believed” are all about Jesus Christ. Luke’s careful history shows who he is, the promised Messiah, the Son of God and the Saviour of the world. His account runs from the promises of the Old Testament to their fulfilment in Jesus, and it shows how “all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen” (2 Corinthians 1:20). After his resurrection Jesus himself told the disciples that “all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me” (Luke 24:44).

The eyewitnesses of verse 2 saw the Lamb of God, “which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), and the word they served was the message that “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself” (2 Corinthians 5:19). Luke’s two books carry the story on to Christ’s ascension and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, who empowered his followers to carry on his mission as his witnesses (Acts 1:8).

So the certainty Luke offers is finally certainty about a person. Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6) and “the author and finisher of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2). Luke’s careful history is the means to that end, and through faith in the Christ he describes “we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1).

Standing on what was handed down

Our faith stands on the same ground Luke gave Theophilus. The events of the gospel happened, they were seen by people who were there from the beginning, and they were handed down with care until they reached us in Scripture. Trusting Christ is a reasoned trust in what God has done in history, and it can stand up to hard questions. When doubts come, you can return to Luke’s account, as Theophilus could, and find firm ground there.

The chain of verse 2 also reaches to us. The eyewitnesses served the word and passed it on, Luke searched it out and wrote it down, and many faithful people since have preserved it. Now it has been delivered to you, and God calls each of us to receive it carefully, to know it well, and to hand it on clearly to those who come after.

Last revised

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Luke 1:1–4. He set out his notes in a four-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.

1662–1714 · 4 verses
Passage under commentLuke 1:1–4
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

Complimental prefaces and dedications, the language of flattery and the food and fuel of pride, are justly condemned by the wise and good; but it doth not therefore follow, that such as are useful and instructive are to be run down; such is this, in which St. Luke dedicates his gospel to his friend Theophilus, not as to his patron, though he was a man of honour, to protect it, but as to his pupil, to learn it, and hold it fast. It is not certain who this Theophilus was; the name signifies a friend of God; some think that it does not mean any particular person, but every one that is a lover of God; Dr. Hammond quotes some of the ancients understanding it so: and then it teaches us, that those who are truly lovers of God, will heartily welcome the gospel of Christ, the design and tendency of which are, to bring us to God. But it is rather to be understood of some particular person, probably a magistrate; because Luke gives him here the same title of respect which St. Paul gave to Festus the governor, kratiste (Acts 26:25), which we there translate most noble Festus, and here most excellent Theophilus. Note, Religion does not destroy civility and good manners, but teaches us, according to the usages of our country, to give honour to them to whom honour is due.

Now observe here, I. Why St. Luke wrote this gospel. It is certain that he was moved by the Holy Ghost, not only to the writing, but in the writing of it; but in both he was moved as a reasonable creature, and not as a mere machine; and he was made to consider,

1.That the things he wrote of were things that were most surely believed among all Christians, and therefore things which they ought to be instructed in, that they may know what they believe, and things which ought to be transmitted to posterity (who are as much concerned in them as we are); and, in order to that, to be committed to writing, which is the surest way of conveyance to the ages to come. He will not write about things of doubtful disputation, things about which Christians may safely differ from one another and hesitate within themselves; but the things which are, and ought to be, most surely believed, pragmata peplērophorēmena - the things which were performed (so some), which Christ and his apostles did, and did with such circumstances as gave a full assurance that they were really done, so that they have gained an established lasting credit. Note, Though it is not the foundation of our faith, yet it is a support to it, that the articles of our creed are things that have been long most surely believed. The doctrine of Christ is what thousands of the wisest and best of men have ventured their souls upon with the greatest assurance and satisfaction.

2.That it was requisite there should be a declaration made in order of those things; that the history of the life of Christ should be methodized, and committed to writing, for the greater certainty of the conveyance. When things are put in order, we know the better where to find them for our own use, and how to keep them for the benefit of others.

3.That there were many who had undertaken to publish narratives of the life of Christ, many well-meaning people, who designed well, and did well, and what they published had done good, though not done by divine inspiration, nor so well done as might be, nor intended for perpetuity. Note,

(1.)The labours of others in the gospel of Christ, if faithful and honest, we ought to commend and encourage, and not to despise, though chargeable with many deficiencies.

(2.)Others' services to Christ must not be reckoned to supersede ours, but rather to quicken them.

4.That the truth of the things he had to write was confirmed by the concurring testimony of those who were competent and unexceptionable witnesses of them; what had been published in writing already, and what he was now about to publish, agreed with that which had been delivered by word of mouth, over and over, by those who from the beginning were eye-witnesses and ministers of the word, Luke 1:2. Note,

(1.)The apostles were ministers of the word of Christ, who is the Word (so some understand it), or of the doctrine of Christ; they, having received it themselves, ministered it to others, 1 John 1:1. They had not a gospel to make as masters, but a gospel to preach as ministers.

(2.)The ministers of the word were eye-witnesses of the things which they preached, and, which is also included, ear-witnesses. They did themselves hear the doctrine of Christ, and see his miracles, and had them not by report, at second hand; and therefore they could not but speak, with the greatest assurance, the things which they had seen and heard, Acts 4:20.

(3.)They were so from the beginning of Christ's ministry, Luke 1:2. He had his disciples with him when he wrought his first miracle, John 2:11. They companied with him all the time he went in and out among them (Acts 1:21), so that they not only heard and saw all that which was sufficient to confirm their faith, but, if there had been any thing to shock it, they had opportunity to discover it.

(4.)The written gospel, which we have to this day, exactly agrees with the gospel which was preached in the first days of the church.

(5.)That he himself had a perfect understanding of the things he wrote of, from the first, Luke 1:3. Some think that here is a tacit reflection upon those who had written before him, that they had not a perfect understanding of what they wrote, and therefore, Here am I, send me ( - facit indignatio versum - my wrath impels my pen); or rather, without reflecting on them, he asserts his own ability for this undertaking: "It seemed good to me, having attained to the exact knowledge of all things, anōthen - from above;" so I think it should be rendered; for if he meant the same with from the beginning (Luke 1:2), as our translation intimates, he would have used the same word.

[1.]He had diligently searched into these things, had followed after them (so the word is), as the Old Testament prophets are said to have enquired and searched diligently, 1 Peter 1:10. He had not taken things so easily and superficially as others who had written before him, but made it his business to inform himself concerning particulars.

[2.]He had received his intelligence, not only by tradition, as others had done, but by revelation, confirming that tradition, and securing him from any error or mistake in the recording of it. He sought it from above (so the word intimates), and from thence he had it; thus, like Elihu, he fetched his knowledge from afar. He wrote his history as Moses wrote his, of things reported by tradition, but ratified by inspiration.

[3.]He could therefore say that he had a perfect understanding of these things. He knew them, akribōs - accurately, exactly. "Now, having received this from above, it seemed good to me to communicate it;" for such a talent as this ought not to be buried.

II.Observe why he sent it to Theophilus:

"I wrote unto thee these things in order, not that thou mayest give reputation to the work, but that thou mayest be edified by it (Luke 1:4); that thou mayest know the certainty of those things wherein thou has been instructed." 1. It is implied, that he had been instructed in these things either before his baptism, or since, or both, according to the rule, Matthew 28:19, Matthew 28:20. Probably, Luke had baptized him, and knew how well instructed he was; peri hōn katēchēthēs - concerning which thou hast been catechized; so the word is; the most knowing Christians began with being catechized. Theophilus was a person of quality, perhaps of noble birth; and so much the more pains should be taken with such when they are young, to teach them the principles of the oracles of God, that they may be fortified against temptations, and furnished for the opportunities, of a high condition in the world. 2. It was intended that he should know the certainty of those things, should understand them more clearly and believe more firmly. There is a certainty in the gospel of Christ, there is that therein which we may build upon; and those who have been well instructed in the things of God when they were young should afterwards give diligence to know the certainty of those things, to know not only what we believe, but why we believe it, that we may be able to give a reason of the hope that is in us.

Historical interpretation

Eight Centuries of Reception

9 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

9 quotes · AD 339–1107
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
30040050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

Ancient Greek Expositoras quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274SourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Photius, comment. in Luc.) The whole Preface of this Evangelist contains two things; first, the condition of those who wrote Gospels before him, (Matthew and Mark for example;) secondly, the reason why he also himself proposed to write one.
Having said, "attempted," a word which may be applied both to those who presumptuously engage upon a subject, and those who reverently handle it, he determines the doubtful expression by two additions; first, by the words, Of things which have been fully accomplished among us; and secondly, As they handed them down to us, who were eyewitnesses from the beginning. The word handed down seems to show, that the eye-witnesses themselves had a commission to transmit the truth. For as they handed it down, so it became others also receiving it in due order, in their turn to publish it. But from the not depositing in writing what had been delivered, several difficulties through lapse of time sprang up. Rightly then did those who had received the tradition from the first eye-witnesses of the Word, establish it in writing for the whole world; thereby repelling falsehood, destroying forgetfulness, and making up from tradition itself a perfect whole.
d. AD 339Eusebius of Caesareaas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Eccl. Hist. iii. 4.) St. Luke at the commencement of his Gospel has told us the reason of his writing, which was, that many others had rashly taken upon themselves to give accounts of those things of which he had a more certain knowledge. And this is his meaning when he says, Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of things.

(sup.) Luke is a sure witness, because he obtained his knowledge of the truth either from St. Paul's instructions, or the instructions and traditions of the other Apostles, who were themselves eyewitnesses from the beginning.
d. AD 378Titus of Bostraas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in proœm. Lucæ.) He says, of things, because not by shadows, as the heretics say, did Jesus accomplish His advent in the flesh, but being as He was the Truth, so in very truth He performed His work.
Now, it is written that the Gospel is addressed to Theophilus, that is, to him whom God loves. If you love God, it is written to you; if it is written to you, accept the gift of the Evangelist: diligently keep the pledge of a friend in the innermost part of your soul. Guard the valuable deposit through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us: examine it frequently, discuss it often. Faith is owed to the pledge first: diligence follows faith; lest moths or rust destroy the entrusted pledges. For whatever has been entrusted to you can be consumed: the Gospel cannot be consumed. The Gospel is a good pledge: but beware that neither moth nor rust consumes it in your mind. Moth consumes it if you believe what you read well, poorly.
d. AD 397Ambrose of Milanas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
When he says, It seemed good to me, he does not deny that it seemed good to God: for it is God who predisposes the wills of men. Now no one has doubted that this book of the Gospel is more full of details than the others; by these words then he claims to himself, not any thing that is false, but the truth; and therefore he says, "It seemed good to me, having investigated every thing, to write." Not to write every thing, but from a review of every thing; "for if all the things which Jesus did were written, I do not think the world itself could contain them." (John 21:25.) But purposely has Luke passed by things that were written by others, in order that each book of the Gospel might be distinguished by certain mysteries and miracles peculiar to itself.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Comm. in Act. Apost. Hom. i.) The Evangelist was so far from being content with his single testimony, that he refers the whole to the Apostles, seeking from them a confirmation of his words; and therefore he adds, as they handed them down to us, who were themselves from the beginning eyewitnesses.

(sup.) He says, were eyewitnesses, because this is our chief ground for believing in a thing, that we derive it from those who were actually eyewitnesses.

(sup.) Or it may be, "That thou mightest feel certain and satisfied as to the truth of those things which thou hast heard, now that thou beholdest the same in writing."
d. AD 735BedeEarly MedievalSourceOn the Gospel of Luke
Prologue. Since many have undertaken to set in order a narrative of those things which have been fulfilled among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely from the beginning, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may know the certainty of those things in which you were instructed. This most clear prologue indicates that the chief reason for writing his Gospel was to prevent false evangelists from having the opportunity to preach falsely, who, as their memorials even today testify, tried to introduce sects under the name of the apostles. Indeed, some ascribed their writings falsely to Thomas, others to Bartholomew, some to Matthias, and even some under the title of the twelve apostles. But also Basilides and Apelles, one of whom taught of 365 heavens, the other of two opposing gods among other vile doctrines, have left Gospels defiled with their errors under their own names. Among these is to be noted what is called the Gospel according to the Hebrews, which should not be counted among the apocryphal but rather ecclesiastical histories. For Jerome, the interpreter of the sacred Scriptures himself, used many testimonies from it, and he translated it into Latin and Greek. False Gospels, however, Luke refuted with his very first preface. "Since many," he says, "have undertaken to compile a narrative." He counted many, not so much by numbers but by the varied diversity of heresy, who not endowed with the gift of the Holy Spirit but rather with empty labor more so attempted to arrange a narrative than to weave the truth of history, and therefore left others to complete the work in which they wasted their efforts in vain. They, indeed, who, although there are four of them, did not publish four Gospels but one consonant with the most beautiful variety of four. They published as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered to them. By this sentence, not only Luke and Mark, who did not see the Lord present in the flesh and therefore had to learn by hearing what they wrote, but Matthew and John the apostles also are designated. For they too, in many things which they wrote, needed to hear from those who could know his infancy, childhood, and genealogy and participate in the acts. And when he says it seemed good to him also to write, he means not as if it seemed to himself by himself, but signifying it also seemed to him by the urging of the Holy Spirit. Just as the apostles in their letter say: "For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us." Whose grace indeed is that what is good may also seem good to us. He then says he followed not a few things but all things carefully. Yet, though he followed all things, it seemed good to write not everything but all those things he believed suitable for confirming the faith of the readers; for even the world itself, if all were written, could not contain them (John 21). Therefore, he intentionally omitted some things said by others, so that the diverse grace of the Gospel might shine, and each book by its own particular miracles of mysteries and deeds might stand out. Theophilus is interpreted as "lover of God" or "beloved by God." Therefore, whoever loves God or desires to be loved by God should consider the Gospel written to him, and keep it as a gift given and entrusted to himself. So that the money of the word received would not be wasted by the moth of heretical corruption or the rust of filthy greed. Not, however, of any new or unknown things does he promise to unfold the account to this same Theophilus, but to express the truth of the words in which he was instructed. Of course, so he might recognize the order in which whatever was done or said by the Lord or about the Lord. For he who wishes to be perfect ought not only to believe in Christ but also to understand the order of his eternal divinity and his temporary dispensation.
d. AD 735Bedeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(in proœm. Lucæ.) The many who are mentioned, he reckons not so much by their number, as by the variety of their manifold heresies; men who were not endued with the gift of the Holy Spirit, but engaging in a vain work, have rather set forth in order a relation of events, than woven a true history.

Nevertheless both Matthew and John were obliged in many things that they wrote to consult those who had had means of knowing the infancy, childhood, and genealogy of our Lord, and of seeing the things which he did.

(sup.) Theophilus means, "loving God," or "being loved by God." Whoever then loves God, or desires to be loved by Him, let him think this Gospel to have been written to him, and preserve it as a gift presented to him, a pledge entrusted to his care. The promise was not to explain the meaning of certain new and strange things to Theophilus, but to set forth the truth of those words in which he had been instructed; as it is added, That thou mightest know the truth of those words in which thou hast been instructed; that is, "that thou mightest be able to know in what order each thing was said or done by the Lord."
d. AD 1107Theophylact of Ohridas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Præf. in Luc.) By these words it is plainly implied, that Luke was not a disciple from the beginning, but became one in course of time; others were disciples from the beginning, as Peter, and the sons of Zebedee.

(in loc.) He writes to Theophilus, a man probably of some distinction, and a governor; for the form, Most excellent, was not used except to rulers and governors. As for example, Paul says to Festus, Most excellent Festus. (Acts 26:25.)

For frequently, when a thing is asserted by any one, and not expressed in writing, we suspect it of falsehood; but when a man has written what he asserts, we are the more inclined to believe it, as if, unless he thought it to be true, he would not commit it to writing.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Luke 1:4 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8