Leviticus 18:8

Translation
King James Version
The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The nakedness H6172 of thy father's H1 wife H802 shalt thou not uncover H1540: it is thy father's H1 nakedness H6172.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
You are not to have sexual relations with your father's wife; that is your father's prerogative.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
You must not have sexual relations with your father’s wife; it would dishonor your father.
Ask
American Standard Version
The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover; it is thy father’s nakedness.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“‘You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife. It is your father’s nakedness.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The shame of thy fathers wife shalt thou not discouer: for it is thy fathers shame.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`The nakedness of the wife of thy father thou dost not uncover; it is the nakedness of thy father.
Ask
See also
Leviticus 20:111 Corinthians 5:1Deuteronomy 27:20Deuteronomy 22:30Amos 2:7Genesis 49:4Ezekiel 22:10
In the KJVVerse 3,260 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Leviticus 18:8, a foundational prohibition within the Holiness Code, strictly forbids a man from engaging in sexual relations with his stepmother, whether his father is living or deceased. This command serves to uphold the sanctity of marital bonds, protect the integrity of the family unit, and distinguish Israel from the morally corrupt practices prevalent among surrounding pagan nations. It underscores the profound theological principle that a spouse's intimacy is an extension of the partner's own "nakedness," making a violation of one a direct affront to the other and to the divine order of marriage, thereby safeguarding the purity and honor of the family in God's sight.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Leviticus 18 is a pivotal chapter within the Holiness Code (Leviticus 17-26), a comprehensive section of the Torah that outlines God's expectations for Israel's moral and ritual purity, setting them apart as a holy nation. This chapter specifically details a comprehensive list of prohibited sexual relationships and practices, including various forms of incest, adultery, and cultic prostitution. These laws follow general instructions on proper sacrifices and precede further regulations on holiness in daily life, forming the ethical core of Israel's covenant relationship with Yahweh. The prohibition in Leviticus 18:8 is part of a series of specific injunctions that elaborate on the general principle introduced in Leviticus 18:6, which broadly forbids uncovering the nakedness of close relatives. The meticulous enumeration of these forbidden unions emphasizes their gravity and the absolute necessity for Israel to maintain sexual purity as a reflection of God's own holiness and to avoid the defilement that would lead to their expulsion from the land, as warned in Leviticus 18:28.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Israel was situated amidst cultures, particularly the Egyptians and Canaanites, whose sexual practices were often characterized by incest, cultic prostitution, and other forms of immorality. Leviticus 18:3 explicitly warns Israel not to follow the customs of these nations, highlighting the stark contrast God demanded. The prohibition against "uncovering the nakedness of thy father's wife" directly addresses practices that were likely common in the surrounding pagan societies, where such unions might have occurred for various reasons, including levirate marriage customs (though distinct from this prohibition), maintaining family lines, or consolidating power. For Israel, adherence to these laws was not merely a matter of social order but a theological imperative, distinguishing them as God's covenant people. By forbidding sexual relations with a stepmother, the law reinforced the sanctity of the father's marriage, even after his death, and prevented the blurring of familial boundaries, which was crucial for maintaining the integrity of the Israelite family structure and their unique identity as a holy nation set apart for Yahweh. This distinction was vital for their spiritual survival and their witness to the surrounding world.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several major theological and narrative themes within Leviticus and the broader Pentateuch. Foremost is the theme of Holiness, emphasizing that God's people must reflect His moral purity in all aspects of life, especially in their most intimate relationships. This is intrinsically linked to the theme of Purity and Defilement, where specific actions, like incest, are deemed "abominations" that defile both the individual and the land (Leviticus 18:27). The law also reinforces the Sanctity of Marriage and Family, establishing clear boundaries for sexual relations to protect the integrity of the "one flesh" union (Genesis 2:24) and the divinely ordained family structure. Finally, it underscores the theme of Distinction and Separation, as Israel is called to be distinct from the pagan nations around them, not adopting their immoral practices but living according to God's righteous decrees (Leviticus 18:24-25). This prohibition, therefore, is not an isolated rule but an integral part of God's comprehensive vision for a holy people living in a holy land.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Nakedness (Hebrew, ʻervâh', H6172): Derived from the root meaning "to be bare," this term (H6172) refers literally to nudity, especially the pudenda. Figuratively, it denotes disgrace, shame, or blemish, and in the context of Leviticus 18, it serves as a common biblical euphemism for sexual intercourse or the private parts involved in such an act. "Uncovering nakedness" signifies an illicit sexual act that violates established boundaries, bringing dishonor, defilement, and public shame.
  • Uncover (Hebrew, gâlâh', H1540): This primitive root (H1540) literally means "to denude," "to reveal," or "to expose." In the context of sexual prohibitions, gâlâh functions as a euphemism for engaging in sexual intercourse. The act of "uncovering" implies an unveiling of intimacy that is reserved exclusively for the marital covenant. When performed outside of its divinely ordained boundaries, it constitutes a profound violation of purity, order, and the sacredness of human relationships.
  • Wife (Hebrew, ʼishshâh', H802): This feminine noun (H802) refers to a woman, often specifically a wife. In the phrase "father's wife," it denotes the stepmother. The inclusion of this specific term highlights that the prohibition applies to the woman who has entered into a marital covenant with the father, emphasizing the enduring nature of that bond and the respect due to her status within the family, even if the father is no longer living.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover": This clause issues a direct, unequivocal, and absolute prohibition against a man having sexual relations with his stepmother. The imperative negative command ("shalt thou not") leaves no room for ambiguity or exception. It establishes a clear and inviolable boundary within the extended family structure, emphasizing that certain relationships are off-limits for sexual intimacy, regardless of personal desire, the father's living status, or prevailing cultural norms. This command primarily protects the sanctity and integrity of the father's marriage and, by extension, the entire family unit.
  • "it [is] thy father's nakedness": This profound statement provides the theological and ethical rationale for the prohibition, elevating it beyond a mere social rule. It asserts that the stepmother, by virtue of her marriage to the father, is considered an extension of the father's own intimate being and marital covenant. To violate the stepmother is, therefore, to violate the father's marital bond and his personal intimacy, even if he is no longer alive. This reflects the "one flesh" principle established in Genesis 2:24, where husband and wife become inextricably linked in a sacred union. Thus, the sin is not merely against the stepmother but against the sacred covenant of marriage, the familial honor due to the father, and ultimately, against God's divine order for human relationships.

Literary Devices

Leviticus 18:8 employs several potent literary devices to convey its powerful and non-negotiable message. The primary device is Euphemism, where the phrase "uncover nakedness" is used to refer to sexual intercourse. This indirect language respects the sanctity and privacy of the sexual act while clearly communicating the prohibition without explicit, graphic detail. Furthermore, the verse utilizes Metonymy or Synecdoche in the profound statement "it is thy father's nakedness." Here, "nakedness" stands in for the entirety of the intimate marital relationship and the sacred bond of the father's union. By violating the stepmother, one is not just violating her person, but symbolically and actually violating the sanctity of the father's sacred marital covenant. The structure of the verse itself is a direct Prohibition, characterized by imperative negative commands ("shalt thou not uncover"), which is typical of legal and ethical codes in the Old Testament, emphasizing the absolute and non-negotiable nature of the divine command and its foundational role in establishing Israel's distinct moral identity.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Leviticus 18:8 is deeply rooted in the broader biblical themes of holiness, purity, and the sanctity of covenant relationships. It underscores God's demand for His people to live a life set apart, distinct from the moral depravity of the surrounding nations. The prohibition against sexual relations with one's stepmother reinforces the divine institution of marriage as a sacred, exclusive union, where two become "one flesh" before God. To violate this boundary is to desecrate the marital covenant and dishonor the family structure established by God as the foundational unit of human society. This law extends beyond mere physical acts, touching upon the profound respect due to parental relationships and the integrity of the family unit, which is foundational to a healthy society and a reflection of God's ordered creation. It demonstrates God's concern for the well-being and moral purity of His people, recognizing that the health of a society begins with the health and integrity of its families.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific context of Leviticus 18:8 addresses an ancient Israelite prohibition, its underlying principles remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This verse powerfully teaches the enduring importance of sexual purity, the sanctity of marital bonds, and the necessity of respecting family relationships. In a contemporary world where sexual ethics are often fluid, family structures are increasingly complex, and personal desires frequently override divine commands, this passage calls us to uphold God's unchanging standards for sexual morality. It challenges us to honor the boundaries God has established for healthy and godly relationships, recognizing that our bodies and our relationships are meant to reflect His holiness and His design. Living out these principles means cultivating integrity, protecting vulnerable relationships, and seeking to honor God in all our interactions, thereby distinguishing ourselves as followers of Christ in a morally compromised world. It compels us to consider how our actions impact not only ourselves but also the broader family unit and the witness of the church.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the principle of "one flesh" in marriage, as implied in this verse, inform our understanding of marital fidelity and respect today, extending even to relationships with former spouses or deceased partners?
  • In what ways does our contemporary society challenge or undermine the biblical standard of sexual purity and the sanctity of family boundaries, and how can believers stand firm in God's truth with grace and conviction?
  • Beyond the specific act, what broader lessons does this verse teach us about honoring all family relationships, maintaining healthy boundaries within them, and protecting the vulnerable within our households?

FAQ

Why is this specific relationship (stepmother) singled out for prohibition?

Answer: This relationship is singled out because it represents a profound violation of the "one flesh" union between a husband and wife. The stepmother, by virtue of her marriage to the father, is considered an extension of the father's own intimacy and marital covenant. To engage in sexual relations with her, even if the father is deceased, is to dishonor the father's sacred marital bond and to disrupt the divinely established order of the family. It also prevents the blurring of generational lines and maintains clarity within the family structure, which was crucial for the moral and social stability of ancient Israel. The law emphasizes that the marital bond creates an enduring kinship that transcends the immediate presence of one of the spouses, ensuring that the father's union is respected and the family's integrity preserved.

Does this law apply if the father is deceased?

Answer: Yes, the prohibition in Leviticus 18:8 applies regardless of whether the father is alive or deceased. The phrase "it is thy father's nakedness" underscores that the marital bond, once established, creates a permanent familial connection that does not dissolve upon the death of one spouse. The sanctity of the father's marriage and the respect due to his union do not cease with his death, as the stepmother remains connected to the father's lineage and household. This is further supported by Leviticus 20:11, which prescribes the death penalty for this sin without distinguishing between the father's living or deceased status, reinforcing the enduring nature of the marital bond and its implications for family purity.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Leviticus 18:8 is a specific prohibition from the Old Testament Law, its deeper principles find profound fulfillment and illumination in Christ. The Law, in its entirety, serves to reveal the holiness of God and the depth of human sin, demonstrating our inability to perfectly uphold God's righteous standards on our own, thus pointing to our desperate need for a Savior (Romans 3:20). Jesus did not abolish the Law but perfectly fulfilled it (Matthew 5:17), elevating its moral demands from external compliance to internal purity of heart and motive (Matthew 5:28). Through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, Christ provides the means for believers to be reconciled to God and empowered by the indwelling Holy Spirit to live lives of genuine holiness that truly reflect God's character (Romans 8:3-4). The sanctity of marriage, a core theme in Leviticus 18:8, is affirmed by Christ as a sacred, lifelong covenant between one man and one woman, established by God Himself (Matthew 19:4-6). Moreover, the Church itself is portrayed as the pure bride of Christ (Ephesians 5:25-27), called to live in purity and distinction from the world's immorality, a spiritual application of the very holiness demanded of Israel. Thus, in Christ, believers are not merely given a list of prohibitions but are transformed from within, enabling them to honor God's design for relationships and live lives that truly reflect His holiness, empowered by His grace.

Copy as

Commentary on Leviticus 18 verses 6–18

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

These laws relate to the seventh commandment, and, no doubt, are obligatory on us under the gospel, for they are consonant to the very light and law of nature: one of the articles, that of a man's having his father's wife, the apostle speaks of as a sin not so much as named among the Gentiles, Co1 5:1. Though some of the incests here forbidden were practised by some particular persons among the heathen, yet they were disallowed and detested, unless among those nations who had become barbarous, and were quite given up to vile affections. Observe,

I. That which is forbidden as to the relations here specified is approaching to them to uncover their nakedness, Lev 18:6.

1.It is chiefly intended to forbid the marrying of any of these relations. Marriage is a divine institution; this and the sabbath, the eldest of all, of equal standing with man upon the earth: it is intended for the comfort of human life, and the decent and honourable propagation of the human race, such as became the dignity of man's nature above that of the beasts. It is honourable in all, and these laws are for the support of the honour of it. It was requisite that a divine ordinance should be subject to divine rules and restraints, especially because it concerns a thing wherein the corrupt nature of man is as apt as in any thing to be wilful and impetuous in its desires, and impatient of check. Yet these prohibitions, besides their being enacted by an incontestable authority, are in themselves highly reasonable and equitable. (1.) By marriage two were to become one flesh, therefore those that before were in a sense one flesh by nature could not, without the greatest absurdity, become one flesh by institution; for the institution was designed to unite those who before were not united. (2.) Marriage puts an equality between husband and wife. "Is she not thy companion taken out of thy side?" Therefore, if those who before were superior and inferior should intermarry (which is the case in most of the instances here laid down), the order of nature would be taken away by a positive institution, which must by no means be allowed. The inequality between master and servant, noble and ignoble, is founded in consent and custom, and there is no harm done if that be taken away by the equality of marriage; but the inequality between parents and children, uncles and nieces, aunts and nephews, either by blood or marriage, is founded in nature, and is therefore perpetual, and cannot without confusion be taken away by the equality of marriage, the institution of which, though ancient, is subsequent to the order of nature. (3.) No relations that are equals are forbidden, except brothers and sisters, by the whole blood or half blood, or by marriage; and in this there is not the same natural absurdity as in the former, for Adam's sons must of necessity have married their own sisters; but it was requisite that it should be made by a positive law unlawful and detestable, for the preventing of sinful familiarities between those that in the days of their youth are supposed to live in a house together, and yet cannot intermarry without defeating one of the intentions of marriage, which is the enlargement of friendship and interest. If every man married his own sister (as they would be apt to do from generation to generation if it were lawful), each family would be a world to itself, and it would be forgotten that we are members one of another. It is certain that this has always been looked upon by the more sober heathen as a most infamous and abominable thing; and those who had not this law yet were herein a law to themselves. The making use of the ordinance of marriage for the patronizing of incestuous mixtures is so far from justifying them, or extenuating their guilt, that it adds the guilt of profaning an ordinance of God, and prostituting that to the vilest of purposes which was instituted for the noblest ends. But,

2.Uncleanness, committed with any of these relations out of marriage, is likewise, without doubt, forbidden here, and no less intended than the former: as also all lascivious carriage, wanton dalliance, and every thing that has the appearance of this evil. Relations must love one another, and are to have free and familiar converse with each other, but it must be with all purity; and the less it is suspected of evil by others the more care ought the persons themselves to take that Satan do not get advantage against them, for he is a very subtle enemy, and seeks all occasions against us.

II. The relations forbidden are most of them plainly described; and it is generally laid down as a rule that what relations of a man's own he is bound up from marrying the same relations of his wife he is likewise forbidden to marry, for they two are one. That law which forbids marrying a brother's wife (Lev 18:16) had an exception peculiar to the Jewish state, that, if a man died without issue, his brother or next of kin should marry the widow, and raise up seed to the deceased (Deu 25:5), for reasons which held good only in that commonwealth; and therefore now that those reasons have ceased the exception ceases, and the law is in force, that a man must in no case marry his brother's widow. That article (Lev 18:18) which forbids a man to take a wife to her sister supposes a connivance at polygamy, as some other laws then did (Exo 21:10; Deu 21:15), but forbids a man's marrying two sisters, as Jacob did, because between those who had before been equal there would be apt to arise greater jealousies and animosities than between wives that were not so nearly related. If the sister of the wife be taken for the concubine, or secondary wife, nothing can be more vexing in her life, or as long as she lives.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–18. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Leviticus 18:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.