Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when all the men of the tower of Shechem heard that, they entered into an hold of the house of the god Berith.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when all the men H1167 of the tower H4026 of Shechem H7927 heard H8085 that, they entered H935 into an hold H6877 of the house H1004 of the god H410 Berith H1286.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
When all the men in the fortress at Sh'khem heard about this, they took refuge in the stronghold of the temple of El-B'rit.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
On hearing of this, all the leaders in the tower of Shechem entered the inner chamber of the temple of El-berith.
Ask
American Standard Version
And when all the men of the tower of Shechem heard thereof, they entered into the stronghold of the house of Elberith.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When all the men of the tower of Shechem heard of it, they entered into the stronghold of the house of Elberith.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when all the men of the towre of Shechem heard it, they entred into an holde of the house of the god Berith.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And all the masters of the tower of Shechem hear, and go in unto the high place of the house of the god Berith,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,801 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 9:46 captures the desperate, climactic moment in Abimelech's brutal campaign against Shechem. Following the city's destruction, the last remaining inhabitants, specifically "all the men of the tower of Shechem," sought a final, desperate refuge within the fortified "house of the god Berith." This act tragically underscores their misplaced trust in a pagan deity and a physical structure, setting the stage for the swift and devastating fulfillment of divine judgment upon them.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed at the devastating climax of Abimelech's campaign against Shechem. The narrative arc of Judges 9 begins with Abimelech's ruthless ascent to power, marked by the murder of his seventy brothers (except Jotham), and Shechem's complicity in making him king. The relationship between Abimelech and Shechem, founded on treachery, inevitably sours, leading to rebellion instigated by Gaal and a subsequent, brutal retaliation by Abimelech. Having already razed the city and symbolically sown salt upon its ruins to ensure its desolation, as described in Judges 9:45, Abimelech now targets the last holdouts. These survivors have retreated into what they believe to be an inviolable stronghold: a sacred edifice. This event directly fulfills Jotham's earlier prophetic curse, where he likened Abimelech and the men of Shechem to combustible thistles and consuming fire, as foretold in Judges 9:15 and explicitly reiterated in Judges 9:20. The narrative of Shechem's destruction thus serves as a stark example of the chaos, moral decay, and divine retribution prevalent during the tumultuous period of the Judges.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Shechem held immense historical and religious significance for Israel. It was a pivotal covenant site where Abraham built an altar upon entering Canaan (Genesis 12:6-7) and where Joshua later renewed the covenant with all Israel before his death (Joshua 24:25-27). However, by the era of the Judges, Shechem had become a deeply syncretistic city, embracing Canaanite deities like Baal-Berith (also known as El-Berith) alongside, or perhaps even in place of, Yahweh. In the ancient Near East, temples were not merely places of worship but often served as central civic structures, treasuries, and, crucially, fortified strongholds or citadels. Their sturdy construction and perceived divine sanctity made them ideal places of refuge during sieges. The "house of the god Berith" was likely the primary religious and civic center of Shechem, believed by its worshippers to provide inviolable sanctuary and protection, especially for those who had entered into covenants under his supposed auspices. This cultural belief explains the desperate actions of the Shechemites in seeking shelter within its walls.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully illustrates several recurring biblical themes central to the book of Judges and broader Old Testament theology. Firstly, it highlights the futility of false security, as the Shechemites' ultimate refuge in a pagan temple proved utterly ineffective against Abimelech's wrath and, more profoundly, against divine judgment. Their reliance on a physical structure and a false deity underscores the emptiness of human-made defenses when God's judgment is at hand. Secondly, the passage underscores the severe consequences of idolatry and unholy alliances. The Shechemites' worship of Baal-Berith and their treacherous "covenant" with Abimelech led directly to their destruction, demonstrating that reliance on false gods and broken covenants inevitably results in ruin. The "god Berith," whose name means "Lord of the Covenant," ironically presided over a covenant that brought mutual destruction, revealing the impotence of such idols. Finally, the event serves as a clear demonstration of divine judgment unfolding. It directly fulfills Jotham's curse, showcasing God's sovereign justice against those who reject His covenant and embrace wickedness, a theme vividly portrayed throughout the broader narrative of Judges.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Berith (Hebrew, Bᵉrîyth', H1286): This term (H1286) refers to a specific Shechemitish deity. While the KJV translates it as "Berith," the full name is often "Baal-Berith" (H1167, "master" or "lord," combined with H1286) or "El-Berith" (H410, "God" or "mighty one," combined with H1286). The underlying Hebrew word bᵉrît (not the proper noun) means "covenant" or "treaty." Thus, the deity's name translates to "Lord of the Covenant" or "God of the Covenant." This name is profoundly ironic in the context of Judges 9. The Shechemites had made a treacherous "covenant" with Abimelech, a covenant of blood and betrayal, and now they seek refuge in the house of a god whose very name signifies covenant. Yet, this "covenant" god is utterly powerless to save them from the consequences of their broken fidelity to Yahweh and their unholy alliance.
  • hold (Hebrew, tsᵉrîyach', H6877): This word (H6877) denotes a "citadel" or "high place," emphasizing a place of strength and defensive capability. It highlights the physical robustness and perceived security of the "house of the god Berith." The Shechemites entered this "hold" precisely because they perceived it as an impenetrable sanctuary, a place of ultimate security against their attackers. The use of tsᵉrîyach underscores their desperate hope that this structure, combined with its sacred status, would offer the protection that their city walls could not.
  • tower (Hebrew, migdâl', H4026): This term (H4026), specifically "the tower of Shechem," refers to a prominent, highly fortified structure, likely a citadel or a strong, elevated building within or adjacent to the city of Shechem. It represents the last bastion of resistance for the remaining men of the city. Their initial retreat from the general city into this "tower" and then into the temple within or near it signifies the dwindling options and increasing desperation of the Shechemite survivors. It was a place of last resort before their final, ill-fated entry into the temple.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when all the men of the tower of Shechem heard [that]": This clause indicates that the survivors, who had retreated to the last fortified part of Shechem (the "tower"), received news of the complete and devastating destruction of the city by Abimelech, including the razing of its walls and the symbolic sowing of salt. The "that" refers to the prior events of Abimelech's relentless assault and the imminent threat to their lives, prompting a desperate, final course of action. They were cornered and aware of their impending doom.
  • "they entered into an hold": This describes the decisive action taken by the men: seeking a final refuge. The word "hold" (as analyzed above) denotes a fortified place, emphasizing their attempt to find physical security in what they believed was an impregnable sanctuary. This was not merely a casual entry but a strategic, albeit desperate and futile, move to escape certain death outside the temple walls.
  • "of the house of the god Berith": This specifies the exact nature of their refuge: the temple dedicated to Baal-Berith (or El-Berith). This detail is crucial for the theological implications of the passage. It highlights their ultimate reliance on a pagan deity and a structure associated with it, rather than turning to the God of Israel, even in their direst moment of existential crisis. This choice underscores their spiritual blindness, their deep-seated idolatry, and the ultimate futility of their hope.

Literary Devices

The passage employs several potent literary devices to convey its profound message. Irony is strikingly prominent: the Shechemites, who had made a treacherous "covenant" with Abimelech under the presumed watch of Baal-Berith, now seek refuge in the "house of the god Berith" from the very person their covenant empowered. This highlights the emptiness and destructive nature of their idolatrous allegiance and the impotence of their "covenant god" to save them. Symbolism is also deeply at play: the "house of the god Berith" symbolizes false security, spiritual apostasy, and the ultimate futility of relying on anything other than the true God. It represents human attempts to find safety in human constructs or pagan powers, which inevitably fail in the face of divine judgment. The "tower of Shechem" can similarly symbolize human pride, self-reliance, and a false sense of invincibility, which are ultimately brought low. Furthermore, the entire episode functions as foreshadowing, directly setting up the dramatic and violent end of the Shechemites and, subsequently, Abimelech himself, thereby fulfilling the prophetic curse of Jotham.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 9:46 serves as a profound theological statement on the nature of true refuge and the devastating consequences of misplaced trust. The Shechemites, facing annihilation, turned to a pagan temple, a symbol of their spiritual apostasy and syncretism, for protection. This act vividly illustrates the biblical principle that human-made securities, false gods, and unholy alliances are ultimately impotent in the face of divine judgment and the pervasive consequences of sin. Their reliance on Baal-Berith, the "Lord of the Covenant," proved tragically ironic, as their covenant with Abimelech and their worship of this idol led directly to their destruction, demonstrating that only the true God of Israel is a reliable refuge and a faithful covenant-keeper. This narrative reminds us that genuine security and deliverance are found exclusively in the Lord, not in the fleeting powers, structures, or deities of this fallen world.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The desperate flight of the Shechemites into the "house of the god Berith" offers a timeless and sobering reflection for believers today. In moments of crisis, fear, or uncertainty, where do we instinctively turn for refuge? Are our "strongholds" truly God-ordained, or are they analogous to the fortified temple of Baal-Berith – seemingly secure, yet ultimately incapable of delivering lasting safety or peace? This passage challenges us to examine our own lives: do we place our ultimate trust in financial stability, career success, social status, political systems, or even our own intellect and strength? While these may offer temporary comfort or perceived security, the narrative of Shechem powerfully reminds us that true and enduring refuge is found only in the Lord. It calls us to repent of any subtle idolatry, where anything other than God occupies the place of ultimate reliance in our hearts, and to instead anchor our hope and security firmly in Him, who alone is a faithful and unfailing fortress in times of trouble.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "towers" or "false securities" do we sometimes rely on instead of God when facing challenges or crises?
  • How does this passage challenge our understanding of true refuge and strength in a world that often promotes self-reliance or worldly solutions?
  • In what ways might we be tempted to make "covenants" or alliances (e.g., compromises with ungodly values) that ultimately lead to spiritual peril, similar to Shechem's alliance with Abimelech?

FAQ

Who was the god Berith?

Answer: The "god Berith" refers to Baal-Berith (or El-Berith), a prominent Canaanite deity whose name means "Lord of the Covenant" or "Master of the Treaty." He was likely worshipped in Shechem as a patron god of covenants and agreements, perhaps even presiding over legal and social contracts. The Shechemites' worship of Baal-Berith highlights their syncretistic practices, blending Canaanite religion with their nominal Israelite heritage, a common issue during the period of the Judges. The irony of his name is profound, as the "covenant" made under his supposed authority (between Abimelech and Shechem) led to utter destruction, demonstrating the impotence of this false god.

Why did the men of Shechem go into the temple?

Answer: The men of Shechem went into the "house of the god Berith" as a desperate, last-ditch effort to find refuge and safety from Abimelech's siege. Temples in the ancient Near East were often constructed as robust, fortified structures, serving not only as places of worship but also as citadels or strongholds during times of war. The Shechemites likely believed that the physical strength of the building, combined with its sacred status, would provide inviolable sanctuary and protection from their attackers, a common belief in the ancient world. They sought a final, impenetrable "hold" against their enemies.

What was the "tower of Shechem" mentioned in the verse?

Answer: The "tower of Shechem" was likely a prominent fortified structure or citadel within or immediately adjacent to the city of Shechem. It represented the last remaining stronghold or bastion of resistance after Abimelech had already destroyed much of the main city. The men of Shechem had retreated to this "tower" as their final defensive position before seeking refuge in the even more secure (in their minds) "house of the god Berith." It signifies the progression of Abimelech's conquest, pushing the survivors into increasingly confined and desperate spaces.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic narrative of Judges 9:46, with the Shechemites seeking futile refuge in the "house of the god Berith," powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and true refuge found only in Jesus Christ. The Shechemites relied on a physical structure and a false "lord of the covenant" who could not deliver them from judgment, leading to their complete destruction. In stark contrast, Christ is the true and faithful covenant-keeper, establishing a new covenant not with human hands or pagan deities, but through His own shed blood on the cross. Where the "house of Berith" failed to protect, Christ offers an eternal and unshakeable sanctuary for all who believe. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, providing the only escape from the ultimate divine judgment that the Shechemites experienced in a temporal sense. Unlike the "tower of Shechem" or the temple of Baal-Berith, which were ultimately burned, the name of the Lord is a strong tower into which the righteous run and are safe. Thus, Judges 9:46, in its depiction of desperate, failed human and idolatrous attempts at security, points us to the absolute necessity and sufficiency of Jesus Christ as our sole and perfect refuge, our unshakeable foundation, and the ultimate fulfillment of God's covenant promises.

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 9 verses 22–49

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Three years Abimelech reigned, after a sort, without any disturbance; it is not said, He judged Israel, or did any service at all to his country, but so long he enjoyed the title and dignity of a king; and not only the Shechemites, but many other places, paid him respect. They must have been fond of a king that could please themselves with such a one as this. But the triumphing of the wicked is short. Within three years, as the years of a hireling, all this glory shall be contemned, and laid in the dust, Isa 16:14. The ruin of these confederates in wickedness was from the righteous hand of the God to whom vengeance belongs. He sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the Shechemites (Jdg 9:23), that is, they grew jealous one of another and ill-affected one to another. He slighted those that set him up, and perhaps countenanced other cities which now began to come into his interests more than he did theirs; and then they grew uneasy at his government, blamed his conduct, and quarrelled at his impositions. This was from God. He permitted the devil, that great mischief-maker, to sow discord between them, and he is an evil spirit, whom God not only keeps under his check, but sometimes serves his own purposes by. Their own lusts were evil spirits; they are devils in men's own hearts; from them come wars and fightings. These God gave them up to, and so might be said to send the evil spirits between them. When men's sin is made their punishment, though God is not the author of the sin, yet the punishment is from him. The quarrel God had with Abimelech and the Shechemites was for the murder of the sons of Gideon (Jdg 9:24): That the cruelty done to them might come and their blood be laid as a burden upon Abimelech that slew them, and the men of Shechem that helped him. Note, 1. Sooner or later God will make inquisition for blood, innocent blood, and will return it on the heads of those that shed it, who shall have blood given them to drink, for they are worthy. 2. Accessaries shall be reckoned with, as well as principals, in that and other sins. The Shechemites that countenanced Abimelech's pretensions, aided and abetted him in his bloody project, and avowed the fact by making him king after he had done it, must fall with him, fall by him, and fall first. 3. Those that combine together to do wickedly are justly dashed in pieces one against another. Blood cannot be a lasting cement to any interest.

I. The Shechemites began to affront Abimelech, perhaps they scarcely knew why or wherefore, but they were given to change. 1. They dealt treacherously with him, Jdg 9:23. It is not said, They repented of their sin in owning him. Had they done so, it would have been laudable to disown him; but they did it only upon some particular pique conceived against him by their pride or envy. Those that set him up were the first that deserted him and endeavoured to dethrone him. It is not strange that those who were ungrateful to Gideon were unfaithful to Abimelech; for what will hold those that will not be held by the obligation of such merits as Gideon's? Note, It is just with God that those who tempt others to be cone perfidious should afterwards be themselves betrayed by those whom they have taught to be perfidious. 2. They aimed to seize him when he was at Arumah (Jdg 9:41), his country-seat. Expecting him to come to town, they set liers in wait for him (Jdg 9:25), who should make him their prisoner whom they had lately made their prince. Those who were thus posted, he not coming, took the opportunity of robbing travellers, which would help to make the people more and more uneasy under Abimelech, when they saw he could not or would not protect them from highway-men. 3. They entertained one Gaal, and set him up as their head in opposition to Abimelech, Jdg 9:26. This Gaal is said to be the son of Ebed, which signifies a servant, perhaps denoting the meanness of his extraction. As Abimelech was by the mother's side, so he by the father's, the son of a servant. Here was one bramble contesting with another. We have reason to suspect that this Gaal was a native Canaanite, because he courts the Shechemites into subjection to the men of Hamor, who was the ancient lord of this city in Jacob's time. He was a bold ambitious man, served their purpose admirably well when they were disposed to quarrel with Abimelech, and they also served his purpose; so he went over to them to blow the coals, and they put their confidence in him. 4. They did all the despite they could to Abimelech's name, Jdg 9:27. They made themselves very merry in his absence, as those who were glad he was out of the way, and who, now that they had another to head them, were in hopes to get clear of him; nay, they went into the house of their god, to solemnize their feast of in-gathering, and there they did eat, and drink, and cursed Abimelech, not only said all the ill they could of him in their table-talk and the song of their drunkards, but wished all the ill they could to him over their sacrifices, praying to their idol to destroy him. They drank healths to his confusion, and with as loud huzzas as ever they had drunk them to his prosperity. That very temple whence they had fetched money to set him up with did they now meet in to curse him and contrive his ruin. Had they deserted their idol-god with their image-king, they might have hoped to prosper; but, while they still cleave to the former, the latter shall cleave to them to their ruin. How should Satan cast out Satan? 5. They pleased themselves with Gaal's vaunted defiance of Abimelech, Jdg 9:28, Jdg 9:29. They loved to hear that impudent upstart speak scornfully, (1.) Of Abimelech, though calling him in disdain Shechem, or a Shechemite, he reflected upon their own city. (2.) Of his good father likewise, Gideon: Is not he the son of Jerubbaal? So he calls him, perhaps in an impious indignation at his name and memory for throwing down the altar of Baal, turning that to his reproach which was his praise. (3.) Of his prime minister of state, Zebul his officer, and ruler of the city. "We may well be ashamed to serve them, and need not be afraid to oppose them." Men of turbulent ambitious spirits thus despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. Gaal aimed not to recover Shechem's liberty, only to change their tyrant: "O that this people were under my hand! What I would do! I would challenge Abimelech to try titles for the crown;" and it should seem he desired his friends to send him word that he was ready to dispute it with him whenever he pleased: "Increase thy army, and come out. Do thy worst; let the point be determined by the sword." This pleased the Shechemites, who were now as sick of Abimelech as ever they had been fond of him. Men of no conscience will be men of no constancy.

II. Abimelech turned all his force upon them, and, in a little time, quite ruined them. Observe the steps of their overthrow.

1.The Shechemites' counsels were betrayed to Abimelech by Zebul his confidant, the ruler of the city, who continued hearty for him. His anger was kindled (Jdg 9:30), and the more because Gaal had spoken slightly of him (Jdg 9:28), for perhaps, if he had complimented and caressed him now that things were in this ferment, he might have gained him to his interest; but he, being disobliged, sends notice to Abimelech of all that was said and done in Shechem against him, Jdg 9:31. Betrayers are often betrayed by some among themselves, and the cursing of the king is sometimes strangely carried by a bird of the air. He prudently advises him to come against the city immediately, and lose no time, Jdg 9:32, Jdg 9:33. He thinks it best that he should march his forces by night into the neighbourhood, surprise the city in the morning, and then make the best of his advantages. How could the Shechemites hope to speed in their attempt when the ruler of their city was in the interests of their enemy? They knew it, and yet took no care to secure him.

2.Gaal, that headed their faction, having been betrayed by Zebul, Abimelech's confidant, was most wretchedly bantered by him. Abimelech, according to Zebul's advice, drew all his forces down upon Shechem by night, Jdg 9:34. Gaal, in the morning, went out to the gate (Jdg 9:35) to see what posture things were in, and to enquire, What news? Zebul, as a ruler of the city, met him there as a friend. Abimelech and his forces beginning to move towards the city, Gaal discovers them (Jdg 9:36), takes notice of their approach to Zebul that was standing with him, little thinking that he had sent for them and was now expecting them. "Look," says he, "do not I see a body of men coming down from the mountain towards us? Yonder they are," pointing to the place. "No, no," says Zebul; "thy eye-sight deceives thee; it is but the shadow of the mountains which thou takest to be an army." By this he intended, (1.) To ridicule him, as a man of no sense or spirit, and therefore very unfit for what he pretended to, as a man that might easily be imposed upon and made to believe any thing, and that was so silly and so cowardly that he apprehended danger where there was none, and was ready to fight with a shadow. (2.) To detain him, and hold him in talk, while the forces of Abimelech were coming up, that thereby they might gain advantage. But when Gaal, being content to believe those he now saw to be but the shadow of the mountains (perhaps the mountains of Ebal and Gerizim, which lay close by the city), was undeceived by the discovery of two other companies that marched apace towards the city, then Zebul took another way to banter him, upbraiding him with what he had said but a day or two before, in contempt of Abimelech (Jdg 9:38): Where is now thy mouth, that foul mouth of thine, wherewith thou saidst, Who is Abimelech? Note, Proud and haughty people are often made in a little time to change their note, and to dread those whom they had most despised. Gaal had, in a bravado, challenged Abimelech to increase his army and come out; but now Zebul, in Abimelech's name, challenges him: Go out, and fight with them, if thou darest. Justly are the insolent thus insulted over.

3.Abimelech routed Gaal's forces that sallied out of the town, Jdg 9:39, Jdg 9:40. Gaal, disheartened no doubt by Zebul's hectoring him, and perceiving his interest weaker than he thought it was, though he marched out against Abimelech with what little force he had, was soon put to the worst, and obliged to retire into the city with great precipitation. In this action the Shechemites' loss was considerable: Many were overthrown and wounded, the common effect of popular tumults, in which the inconsiderate multitude are often drawn into fatal snare by those that promise them glorious success.

4.Zebul that night expelled Gaal, and the party he had brought with him into Shechem, out of the city (Jdg 9:41), sending him to the place whence he came. For though the generality of the city continued still averse to Abimelech, as appears by the sequel of the story, yet they were willing to part with Gaal, and did not oppose his expulsion, because, though he had talked big, both his skill and courage had failed him when there was occasion for them. Most people judge of men's fitness for business by their success, and he that does not speed well is concluded not to do well. Well, Gaal's interest in Shechem is soon at an end, and he that had talked of removing Abimelech is himself removed, nor do we ever hear of him any more. Exit Gaal - Gaal retires.

5.Abimelech, the next day, set upon the city, and quite destroyed it, for their treacherous dealings with him. Perhaps Abimelech had notice of their expelling Gaal, who had headed the faction, with which they thought he would have been satisfied, but the crime was too keep to be thus atoned for, and his resentments were too keen to be pacified by so small an instance of submission, besides that it was more Zebul's act than theirs; by it their hands were weakened, and therefore he resolved to follow his blow, and effectually to chastise their treachery. (1.) He had intelligence brought him that the people of Shechem had come out into the field, Jdg 9:42. Some think into the field of business to plough and sow (having lately gathered in their harvest), or to perfect their harvest, for it was only their vintage that they had made an end of (Jdg 9:27), and then it intimates that they were secure. And because Abimelech had retired (Jdg 9:41) they thought themselves in no danger from him, and then the issue of it is an instance of sudden destruction coming upon those that cry, Peace and safety. Others think they went out into the field of battle; though Gaal was driven out, they would not lay down their arms, but put themselves into a posture for another engagement with Abimelech, in which they hoped to retrieve what they had lost the day before, (2.) He himself, with a strong detachment, cut off the communication between them and the city, stood in the entering of the gate (Jdg 9:44), that they might neither make their retreat into the city nor receive any succours from the city, and then sent two companies of his men, who were too strong for them, and they put them all to the sword, ran upon those that were in the fields and slew them. When we go out about our business we are not sure that we shall come home again; there are deaths both in the city and in the field. (3.) He then fell upon the city itself, and, with a rage reaching up to heaven, though it was the place of his nativity, laid it in ruins, slew all the people, beat down all the buildings, and, in token of his desire that it might be a perpetual desolation, sowed it with salt, that it might remain a lasting monument of the punishment of perfidiousness. Yet Abimelech prevailed not to make its desolations perpetual; for it was afterwards rebuilt, and became so considerable a place that all Israel came thither to make Rehoboam king, Kg1 12:1. And the place proved an ill omen. Abimelech intended hereby to punish the Shechemites for their serving him formerly in the murder of Gideon's sons. Thus, when God makes use of men as instruments in his hand to do his work, he means one thing and they another, Isa 10:6, Isa 10:7. They design to maintain their honour, but God to maintain his.

6.Those that retired into a strong-hold of their idol-temple were all destroyed there. These are called the men of the tower of Shechem (Jdg 9:46, Jdg 9:47), some castle that belonged to the city, but lay at some distance from it. They, hearing of the destruction of the city, withdrew into a hold of the temple, trusting, it is likely, not so much to its strength as to its sanctity; they put themselves under the protection of their idol: for thus all people will walk in the name of their god, and shall not we then choose to dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of our life? For in the time of trouble he shall hide us in his pavilion, Psa 27:5. The name of the Lord is a strong tower, Pro 18:10. But that which they hoped would be for their welfare proved to them a snare and a trap, as those will certainly find that run to idols for shelter; it will prove a refuge of lies. When Abimelech had them altogether penned up in that hold he desired no more. That barbarous project immediately came into his head of setting fire to the strong-hold, and, so to speak, burning all the birds together in the nest. He kept the design to himself, but set all his men on work to expedite the execution of it, Jdg 9:48, Jdg 9:49. He ordered them all to follow him, and do as he did: as his father had said to his men (Jdg 7:17), Look on me, and do likewise; so saith he to his, as becomes a general that will not be wanting to give both the plainest direction and the highest encouragement that can be to his soldiers: What you have seen me do make haste to do, as I have done. Not Ite illuc - Go thither; but Venite huc - Come hither. The officers in Christ's army should thus teach by their example, Phi 4:9. He and they fetched each of them a bough from a wood not far off, laid all their boughs together under the wall of this tower, which it is probable was of wood, set fire to their boughs, and so burnt down their hold and all that were in it, who were either burnt or stifled with the smoke. What inventions men have to destroy one another! Whence come these cruel wars and fightings but from their lusts? Some think that the men of the tower of Shechem were the same with the house of Millo, and then Jotham's just imprecation was answered in the letter: Let fire come out from Abimelech, and devour not only in general the men of Shechem, but in particular the house of Millo, Jdg 9:20. About 1000 men and women perished in these flames, many of whom, it is probable, were no way concerned in the quarrel between Abimelech and the Shechemites, nor meddled with either side, yet, in this civil war, they came to this miserable end; for men of factious turbulent spirits perish not alone in their iniquity, but involve many more, that follow them in their simplicity, in the same calamity with them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 22–49. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 9:46 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.