Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And it went down from Janohah to Ataroth, and to Naarath, and came to Jericho, and went out at Jordan.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And it went down H3381 from Janohah H3239 to Ataroth H5852, and to Naarath H5292, and came H6293 to Jericho H3405, and went out H3318 at Jordan H3383.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
then it went down from Yanochah to 'Atarot, went to Na'arah, extended to Yericho and ended at the Yarden.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
From Janoah it went down to Ataroth and Naarah, and then reached Jericho and came out at the Jordan.
Ask
American Standard Version
and it went down from Janoah to Ataroth, and to Naarah, and reached unto Jericho, and went out at the Jordan.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
It went down from Janoah to Ataroth, to Naarah, reached to Jericho, and went out at the Jordan.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And goeth downe from Ianohah to Ataroth, and Naarath, and commeth to Iericho, and goeth out at Iorden.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and gone down from Janohah to Ataroth, and to Naarath, and touched against Jericho, and gone out at the Jordan.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,273 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 16:7 meticulously delineates a specific segment of the southern boundary of the territory allotted to the tribe of Ephraim within the Promised Land. This verse traces the border's precise trajectory as it descends from the highland region of Janohah, passes through the significant points of Ataroth and Naarath, reaches the ancient city of Jericho, and finally extends eastward to the Jordan River, thereby defining a crucial portion of Ephraim's inheritance and underscoring the tangible fulfillment of God's covenant promises.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Joshua 16:7 is embedded within the detailed account of the division of the land of Canaan among the Israelite tribes, specifically following the initial allocation to Judah and the general description of the Josephite tribes' (Ephraim and Manasseh) inheritance. Chapters 13-19 of the book of Joshua are dedicated to these precise geographical descriptions, serving as a legal and historical record of the fulfillment of God's covenant promises. This particular verse, following the broader outline of Ephraim's territory in Joshua 16:1-3, offers a granular, topographical description of the southern border, distinguishing Ephraim's land from that of Benjamin to the south. It is part of a meticulous inventory, emphasizing the tangible reality of the land's distribution and the orderly nature of the divine plan.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The division of the land occurred after the initial conquest campaigns led by Joshua, marking a pivotal transition for Israel from a nomadic, conquering people to a settled, agrarian society. The precise delineation of tribal boundaries was crucial for establishing identity, preventing disputes over resources, and ensuring the equitable distribution of an agricultural society's lifeblood—land. Culturally, land ownership was deeply tied to identity, inheritance, and covenant blessings, reflecting God's faithfulness to the patriarchal promises. Geographically, the verse describes a descent from the central highlands of Canaan (where Janohah would be located) eastward towards the Jordan Valley, a significant topographical feature that served as a natural eastern boundary for many tribes. Jericho, mentioned in the verse, was a strategically important and ancient city, famously conquered by Joshua at the beginning of the conquest narrative in Joshua 6, making its inclusion as a border marker highly significant due to its historical and strategic prominence.
  • Key Themes: This geographical verse, though seemingly mundane, contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Joshua and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it powerfully underscores Divine Faithfulness and Fulfillment, demonstrating God's meticulous adherence to His ancient covenant promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to give their descendants a specific land (Genesis 15:18). The detailed boundaries prove that God's word is precise and trustworthy, fulfilling His word down to the very borders. Secondly, it highlights Precision and Order, revealing the systematic and orderly way in which God's will was executed through Joshua's leadership. The exact enumeration of landmarks signifies a divinely ordained structure, not a haphazard allocation, reflecting God's character. Thirdly, it reinforces the theme of Tribal Inheritance and Secure Possession, emphasizing that each tribe received its designated portion, securing their identity and future within the land. This meticulous record served as a foundational document for Israel's national identity and their relationship with God, who provided for them so completely, as promised in Deuteronomy 1:8.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Janohah (Hebrew, Yânôwach', H3239): Meaning "quiet." This refers to a specific place in Palestine, likely in the central hill country of Ephraim. Its inclusion as a starting point for the border's descent signifies a known, established landmark, anchoring the boundary's description in a tangible, recognizable location for the original audience.
  • went down (Hebrew, yârad', H3381): A primitive root meaning "to descend (literally, to go downwards; or conventionally to a lower region... or figuratively, to fall)." This verb signifies a descent in elevation, which is geographically accurate for the terrain from the central highlands of Canaan towards the Jordan Valley. The use of "went down" is not merely descriptive but implies a natural topographical flow of the boundary, following valleys and contours. It highlights the realistic, tangible nature of the land division and the careful observation of the landscape by those surveying it.
  • went out (Hebrew, yâtsâʼ', H3318): A primitive root meaning "to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications." In this context, it signifies the border's extension and termination at the Jordan River. It marks the final point of this specific segment of the boundary, indicating that the border reached and exited at the river, establishing a clear and unmistakable eastern limit for Ephraim's territory.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And it went down from Janohah to Ataroth": This phrase initiates the description of the southern border's trajectory, indicating a general eastward and downward movement from a known point, Janohah. Janohah likely refers to a location in the central hill country, serving as an initial high-point marker. Ataroth, another significant landmark, is reached as the border descends, implying a specific path through the terrain. The verb "went down" emphasizes the topographical reality of the border's course.
  • "and to Naarath": The boundary continues its eastward descent, passing through or touching Naarath. The repeated "and to" (וְעַד, ve'ad) emphasizes a continuous, sequential path, meticulously listing each significant point along the border's course. This reinforces the precision with which the land was divided and the thoroughness of the geographical record.
  • "and came to Jericho": This marks a crucial point in the border's journey. Jericho, a prominent city in the Jordan Valley, serves as a major landmark, indicating that the southern boundary of Ephraim extended to or near this historically significant location. The phrase "came to" suggests the culmination of this segment of the border's path, bringing it to a well-known and strategically important city.
  • "and went out at Jordan": The final segment of this border description indicates that the boundary extended all the way to the Jordan River, which formed the natural eastern boundary of the land of Canaan. "Went out at Jordan" implies that the border reached and terminated at the river, establishing a clear and unmistakable eastern limit for Ephraim's territory, thus completing this portion of the boundary description.

Literary Devices

Joshua 16:7 primarily employs Topographical Description, meticulously detailing the geographical features and landmarks that define the southern border of Ephraim. The verse functions as a precise survey record, utilizing a sequential listing of places to trace the boundary's path. The consistent use of the conjunction "and" (the Hebrew waw conjunction), creating a sense of Polysyndeton, emphasizes a continuous, unbroken line and contributes to a feeling of Meticulous Detail and Linear Progression. This stylistic choice underscores the thoroughness of the land division and the deliberate nature of God's fulfillment of His promises. The verb "went down" (יָרַד - yarad) also subtly introduces Directional Movement, guiding the reader's mental map along the descending terrain towards the Jordan Valley. The overall effect is one of Precision and Order, underscoring the careful and deliberate fulfillment of God's promises through the tangible act of land allocation.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Joshua 16:7, while a geographical detail, is profoundly theological. It testifies to God's faithfulness and meticulousness in fulfilling His covenant promises. Just as God promised Abraham a land for his descendants, this verse demonstrates the precise, tangible reality of that promise's fulfillment. The exact delineation of boundaries reflects not only human administration but divine intention, showing that God's plans are not vague aspirations but concrete and detailed realities. This precision instills confidence in God's character—He is a God who keeps His word, down to the smallest detail. It reminds us that our inheritance, whether spiritual or physical, is secured by His unwavering faithfulness and meticulous provision. The very act of defining these borders speaks to God's orderly nature and His commitment to His people's well-being and secure possession.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Joshua 16:7 invites us to marvel at the meticulous nature of God. If God is so precise in detailing geographical boundaries for an ancient tribe, how much more detailed and intentional is His plan for our lives and His kingdom? This verse calls us to trust in God's faithfulness, recognizing that His promises are not vague aspirations but concrete realities, meticulously worked out in time and space. It encourages us to find security in His sovereign design, knowing that He has established boundaries and provisions for our good. Just as Ephraim received a defined inheritance, we too have an inheritance in Christ, secured by God's precise and unwavering commitment. This passage also subtly reminds us of the importance of spiritual boundaries in our lives—those principles and commands God has given us for our protection and flourishing, ensuring we remain within the bounds of His blessing and purpose. Embracing God's order, even in seemingly small details, leads to a life of greater peace and fruitfulness.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of this geographical verse deepen your understanding of God's character and His faithfulness?
  • In what areas of your life do you need to trust more in God's precise and orderly provision, rather than relying on your own plans or anxieties?
  • What "boundaries" (spiritual, relational, ethical) has God established for your life, and how do they contribute to your flourishing and security within His will?

FAQ

Why does the Bible include such detailed geographical descriptions, which seem less relevant to modern readers?

Answer: The inclusion of detailed geographical descriptions like Joshua 16:7 serves several crucial purposes. Firstly, it provides undeniable evidence of the historical reality of the events described. These are not mythical tales but accounts rooted in a specific time and place, anchoring the biblical narrative in tangible history and demonstrating its veracity. Secondly, these details underscore God's faithfulness in fulfilling His promises. The land was promised, and here are the precise boundaries of its distribution, demonstrating God's meticulous attention to His word and His unwavering commitment to His covenant. Thirdly, for the original audience, these details were vital for establishing tribal identity, land ownership, and preventing disputes, serving as a legal and administrative record that secured their inheritance. For modern readers, they reinforce the truthfulness of Scripture and highlight God's orderliness and precision in all His dealings, even in seemingly mundane details, inviting us to trust in His comprehensive plan.

What is the spiritual significance of "boundaries" in the biblical narrative, as exemplified by this verse?

Answer: In the biblical narrative, boundaries are more than just geographical lines; they often carry profound spiritual significance, representing God's order, provision, and protection. For the Israelites, the boundaries of their tribal inheritances signified their secure possession of the land promised by God, a place of blessing, identity, and rest. Spiritually, boundaries can symbolize the parameters God sets for human flourishing—His commands, covenants, and the limits of our freedom. Just as the land boundaries protected the tribes from encroachment and ensured their inheritance, God's spiritual boundaries protect us from spiritual danger, define our identity in Him, and secure our spiritual inheritance. They are not restrictive for restriction's sake, but for our good, leading us into a life of blessing and purpose within God's will, as seen in the wisdom literature's emphasis on staying within wisdom's bounds and guarding one's path (Proverbs 4:26-27).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Joshua 16:7 describes a physical land boundary in ancient Israel, it points forward to the ultimate inheritance found in Jesus Christ. The meticulous division of the land, ensuring each tribe received its portion, foreshadows the spiritual inheritance believers receive through Christ, which is far more secure and eternal. Just as the Israelites entered a physical land of rest, believers enter into a spiritual rest and inheritance in Christ, not through conquest of physical territory but through His finished work on the cross. The "going down" to the Jordan River can symbolically point to Christ's condescension, His "going down" from heaven to earth, and even His baptism in the Jordan, initiating His public ministry that would secure our true, heavenly inheritance. Our inheritance is not a piece of land but participation in Christ's own inheritance as the Son of God (Romans 8:17). He is our true "Promised Land," our dwelling place, and the source of all our blessings (Ephesians 1:3). The meticulous precision of the land boundaries finds its ultimate fulfillment in the perfect and unshakeable security of our salvation and eternal life, guaranteed by Christ's faithfulness and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, who is the down payment of our inheritance (Ephesians 1:13-14).

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 16 verses 5–10

Here, 1. The border of the lot of Ephraim is set down, by which it was divided on the south from Benjamin and Dan, who lay between it and Judah, and on the north from Manasseh; for east and west it reached from Jordan to the great sea. The learned, who aim to be exact in drawing the line according to the directions here, find themselves very much at a loss, the description being short and intricate. The report of those who in these latter ages have travelled those countries will not serve to clear the difficulties, so vastly unlike is it now to what it was then; not only cities have been so destroyed as that no mark nor footstep of them remains, but brooks are dried up, rivers alter their courses, and even the mountain falling cometh to nought, and the rock is removed out of his place, Job 14:18. Unless I could hope to solve the doubts that arise upon this draught of the border of Ephraim, it is to no purpose to mention them: no doubt it was then perfectly understood, so as that the first intention of recording it was effectually answered, which was to notify the ancient landmarks, which posterity must by no means remove. 2. Some separate cities are spoken of, that lay not within these borders, at least not if the line was drawn direct, but lay within the lot of Manasseh (Jos 16:9), which might better be read, and there were separate cities for the children of Ephraim among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, because it proved that Manasseh could spare them, and Ephraim had need of them, and it might be hoped that no inconvenience would arise from this mixture of these two tribes together, who were both the sons of Joseph, and should love as brethren. And by this it appears that though, when the tribes were numbered in the plains of Moab, Manasseh had got the start of Ephraim in number, for Manasseh was then 52,000, and Ephraim but 32,000 (Num 26:34, Num 26:37), yet by the time they were well settled in Canaan the hands were crossed again, and the blessing of Moses was verified, Deu 33:17, They are the ten thousands of Ephraim and they are the thousands of Manasseh. Families and kingdoms are diminished and increased, increased and diminished again, as God pleases. 3. A brand is put upon the Ephraimites, that they did not drive out the Canaanites from Gezer (Jos 16:10), either through carelessness or cowardice, either for want of faith in the promise of God, that he would give them success if they would make a vigorous effort, or for want of zeal for the command of God, which obliged them utterly to drive out the Canaanites, and to make no peace with them. And, though they hoped to satisfy the law by putting them under tribute, yet (as Calvin thinks) this made the matter worse, for it shows that they spared them out of covetousness, that they might be profited by their labours, and by dealing with them for their tribute they were in danger of being infected with their idolatry; yet some think that, when they brought them under tribute, they obliged them to renounce their idols, and to observe the seven precepts of the sons of Noah; and I should think so, but that we find in the sequel of the story that the Israelites were so far from restraining idolatry in others that they soon fell into it themselves. Many famous places were within this lot of the tribe of Ephraim, though not mentioned here. In it were Ramah, Samuel's city (called in the New Testament Arimathea, of which Joseph was, that took care of our Saviour's burial), and Shiloh, where the tabernacle was first set up. Tirzah also, the royal city of Jeroboam and his successors, and Deborah's palm-tree, under which she judged Israel, were in this tribe. Samaria, built by Omri after the burning of the royal palace of Tirzah, was in this tribe, and was long the royal city of the kingdom of the ten tribes; not far from it were Shechem, and the mountains Ebal and Gerizim, and Sychar, near which was Jacob's well, where Christ talked with the woman of Samaria. We read much of Mount Ephraim in the story of the Judges, and of a city called Ephraim, it is probable in this tribe, to which Christ retired, Joh 11:54. The whole kingdom of the ten tribes is often, in the prophets, especially in Hosea, called Ephraim.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 16:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.