Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, that might lay his hand upon us both.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Neither is H3426 there any daysman H3198 betwixt us, that might lay H7896 his hand H3027 upon us both H8147.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
There is no arbitrator between us who could lay his hand on us both.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Nor is there a mediator between us, to lay his hand upon us both.
Ask
American Standard Version
There is no umpire betwixt us, That might lay his hand upon us both.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
There is no umpire between us, that might lay his hand on us both.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Neyther is there any vmpire that might lay his hand vpon vs both.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
If there were between us an umpire, He doth place his hand on us both.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Job 9:33 encapsulates Job's profound spiritual anguish and sense of utter helplessness in the face of his inexplicable suffering. He laments the absence of an impartial mediator, or "daysman," who could stand between himself and an omnipotent God. Feeling overwhelmed by divine power and justice, Job expresses his desperate yearning for an arbiter with the authority to "lay his hand upon us both," thereby bridging the infinite chasm he perceives between his finite humanity and God's incomprehensible majesty, and facilitating a just resolution to his agonizing plight.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Job 9:33 is situated within Job's first extensive response to Bildad, marking a critical point in the initial cycle of dialogues between Job and his friends (chapters 3-14). Following Bildad's rigid assertion of divine justice and the implied correlation between suffering and sin, Job launches into a powerful discourse on God's unchallengeable sovereignty and power. In Job 9:1-12, he acknowledges God's absolute might, describing Him as one who "removes mountains, and they know it not" and "shakes the earth out of its place." This recognition of God's overwhelming power leads Job to despair of ever successfully pleading his case. He argues that even if he were righteous, he could not contend with God (Job 9:14-20). The verse thus serves as the poignant culmination of Job's realization that he is utterly outmatched and without recourse in his perceived legal dispute with God, intensifying his desperate need for an intermediary.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The concept of a "daysman" (Hebrew: mokhiach or yâkach) was deeply embedded in the legal and social framework of the ancient Near East. When two parties were embroiled in a dispute that they could not resolve directly, a respected third party—an arbiter, umpire, or mediator—would be appointed. This individual was tasked with hearing both sides of the argument, assessing the evidence, and then rendering an impartial judgment or facilitating a settlement. The phrase "lay his hand upon us both" vividly evokes the physical gesture of such an arbiter, signifying their authority to bring the disputants together, to enforce a decision, or to guarantee a fair hearing. Job's lament in Job 9:33 reflects this common human need for an impartial judge when facing an overwhelming or seemingly inscrutable opponent, especially when the very nature of justice appears to be at stake. The absence of such a figure between himself and a God whose actions seemed incomprehensible intensified Job's suffering and sense of injustice.

  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully articulates several foundational themes within the book of Job and the broader biblical narrative. Foremost is The Infinite Chasm Between Humanity and God, highlighting the qualitative difference between finite, frail humanity and the infinite, omnipotent Creator. Job's cry underscores Human Helplessness Before Divine Majesty and Incomprehensibility, as he feels utterly incapable of understanding or influencing God's actions, leading to a profound sense of isolation and injustice (Job 23:3-9). This also directly engages with the Problem of Theodicy, the enduring struggle to reconcile God's goodness and omnipotence with the pervasive reality of evil and suffering. Job's longing for a "daysman" is a desperate plea for someone to bridge the gap of understanding, to bring clarity to his suffering, which he perceives as undeserved and inexplicable given God's character (Job 10:2-3). Ultimately, it foreshadows the universal human need for a divine mediator.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • is (Hebrew, yêsh', H3426): This word, derived from a root meaning "to stand out" or "exist," functions as a substantive verb, indicating existence or presence. In Job 9:33, its negative usage ("Neither is there any daysman") emphasizes the absence of such a figure. Job is not merely wishing for a daysman; he is stating a stark reality that no such mediator exists between him and God, underscoring his profound isolation and the impossibility of his situation.
  • daysman (Hebrew, yâkach', H3198): This term originates from a primitive root meaning "to be right," and by extension, "to argue," "to decide," "to justify," or "to convict." In a legal context, a yâkach is an arbiter, an umpire, or a judge who stands between two disputing parties to hear their cases, render a fair judgment, or bring them to an agreement. Job's use of this word highlights his desire for an impartial third party with the authority to intervene in his "case" against God, someone who could objectively assess his righteousness and God's actions, and compel both sides to a resolution. It signifies a person who could bring clarity, justice, and reconciliation to an otherwise unresolvable conflict.
  • lay (Hebrew, shîyth', H7896): A primitive root meaning "to place" or "to put," this verb is used in a very wide application, including to apply, appoint, or set. In the phrase "might lay his hand," it denotes the active, authoritative placement or imposition of the hand. It signifies the mediator's decisive action, asserting control or influence over both parties, bringing them into a shared space of accountability and potential resolution. This is not a passive observation but an active intervention.
  • hand (Hebrew, yâd', H3027): This primitive word refers to the "hand," specifically the open one, and is used literally and figuratively to denote power, means, direction, and authority. In the context of "lay his hand upon us both," the hand symbolizes the mediator's authority, control, and ability to bring the two disputants into a binding agreement or judgment. It represents the tangible exercise of power necessary to bridge the chasm between Job and God, compelling both to a fair hearing and a just outcome.
  • both (Hebrew, shᵉnayim', H8147): This word is the dual form of "second" and simply means "two." In this verse, it explicitly refers to Job and God, emphasizing that the desired mediator must have authority and influence over both parties in the dispute. This highlights the impartiality and comprehensive reach required of the "daysman"—they must be able to compel both the human and the divine to the arbitration.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Neither is there any daysman betwixt us": This clause articulates Job's profound lament and sense of utter helplessness. He feels trapped in what he perceives as a legal dispute with God, yet he lacks the customary and necessary means of resolution available in human courts. The "us" refers to Job (representing suffering humanity) and God (the omnipotent, seemingly inscrutable judge). Job perceives an insurmountable chasm, a lack of common ground or a neutral party, making any direct appeal or defense on his part impossible against the Almighty. This statement is a declaration of despair, recognizing an unbridgeable gap.
  • "[that] might lay his hand upon us both": This phrase further elaborates on the desired, yet absent, function of the "daysman." The mediator is not merely a witness but an active participant who possesses the authority and impartiality to intervene decisively. The "laying of hands" symbolizes the mediator's power to compel both sides to abide by a decision, to bring them into a state of agreement, or to ensure a fair and equitable hearing. Job longs for someone who can bridge the infinite power differential and ensure that his case is heard and judged fairly, without being overwhelmed by God's majesty or unapproachable holiness.

Literary Devices

Job 9:33 powerfully employs several literary devices to convey Job's profound despair. The verse is a poignant Lament, expressing Job's deep sorrow, frustration, and sense of injustice in his suffering. His statement, while declarative, functions as an implicit Rhetorical Question, underscoring the impossibility of his situation and the desperate need for a solution that, from his perspective, does not exist. The phrase "lay his hand upon us both" is a vivid Metaphor, drawing on the common ancient Near Eastern cultural practice of an arbiter physically intervening in a dispute. This imagery symbolizes the mediator's authority, impartiality, and ability to bring two disparate parties into reconciliation or judgment. This tangible, authoritative intervention is precisely what Job so desperately desires, highlighting the depth of his feeling that he is utterly alone and without recourse against God.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Job's agonizing cry for a "daysman" in Job 9:33 articulates a universal human longing for reconciliation and just mediation with the divine, especially in the face of suffering or perceived injustice. It highlights the inherent chasm between a holy, omnipotent God and finite, sinful humanity—a gap that no human can bridge on their own. This profound need for an intermediary is a recurring theme throughout the biblical narrative, foreshadowing God's ultimate provision of a perfect mediator. The Old Testament often points to figures like Moses, who interceded for Israel (e.g., Exodus 32:30-32), or the High Priest, who mediated between God and the people through sacrifice and prayer (e.g., Leviticus 16:1-34). These figures, however, were temporary and imperfect "daysmen," pointing to a greater, ultimate fulfillment. Job's longing, therefore, is a prophetic cry for the one who would truly be able to "lay his hand upon us both."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Job's agonizing plea in Job 9:33 resonates deeply with the human experience of feeling overwhelmed, misunderstood, or unjustly treated, particularly when grappling with God's sovereignty and the profound mysteries of suffering. It underscores our inherent limitations in comprehending divine wisdom and our inability to contend with God on our own terms. In our moments of deepest despair, when the chasm between our human experience and God's perceived distance seems too vast, Job's cry reminds us that we are not alone in our longing for understanding and reconciliation. It highlights our universal need for someone to bridge that gap, to advocate for us, and to bring clarity and peace where there is confusion and pain. This verse invites us to acknowledge our own spiritual helplessness and to recognize the profound grace of God in addressing this fundamental human need, ultimately pointing us to the truth that God Himself has provided the very mediator Job longed for.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what situations have you felt a similar sense of distance or incomprehension regarding God's actions or will?
  • How does Job's longing for a "daysman" speak to your own need for an advocate or intercessor in your relationship with God?
  • What does this verse reveal about the human condition when confronted with divine power, holiness, and the complexities of justice?

FAQ

What exactly is a "daysman" in the context of Job 9:33?

Answer: In Job 9:33, a "daysman" (from the Hebrew yâkach) refers to an arbiter, umpire, or mediator. In ancient Near Eastern legal and social systems, when two parties had a dispute they could not resolve themselves, they would appoint a third, impartial party to hear both sides, assess the facts, and render a judgment or facilitate a settlement. Job felt himself to be in a legal dispute with God regarding his suffering, but he despaired because he perceived no one with the authority and impartiality to stand between him and the Almighty, to "lay his hand upon us both" and ensure a fair hearing or just resolution.

Why did Job feel he needed a "daysman" to deal with God?

Answer: Job felt he needed a "daysman" because he perceived an insurmountable power imbalance and an inability to contend with God directly. Throughout Job 9, Job acknowledges God's immense power, wisdom, and sovereignty (e.g., Job 9:4-12). He believed that even if he were innocent, God's overwhelming majesty would prevent him from successfully pleading his case or proving his righteousness (e.g., Job 9:14-20). He longed for someone who could bridge the infinite gap between human frailty and divine omnipotence, someone who could compel both parties to a fair hearing and a just outcome, allowing him to understand why he was suffering despite his innocence.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Job's desperate cry for a "daysman" in Job 9:33 finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The chasm that Job perceived between himself and God—a chasm of infinite power, holiness, and human sinfulness—is precisely what necessitated a divine mediator. The New Testament unequivocally presents Jesus as this perfect intermediary. As 1 Timothy 2:5 declares, "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." Unlike the absent "daysman" Job longed for, Jesus is not merely an impartial arbiter but one who fully identifies with both God and humanity, being both fully God and fully man. He is the mediator of a better covenant and the mediator of the new covenant, establishing a relationship with God based on grace and forgiveness, not legal dispute. Through His atoning sacrifice on the cross, Jesus "laid His hand upon us both," bridging the gap of sin and reconciling humanity to God (2 Corinthians 5:18-19). He is our Great High Priest who sympathizes with our weaknesses, and through whom we can approach God's throne of grace with confidence, no longer needing to fear an unapproachable deity. Job's ancient longing is thus met in the living reality of Christ, who is the way, the truth, and the life, providing direct and loving access to the Father.

Copy as

Commentary on Job 9 verses 25–35

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Job here grows more and more querulous, and does not conclude this chapter with such reverent expressions of God's wisdom and justice as he began with. Those that indulge a complaining humour know not to what indecencies, nay, to what impieties, it will hurry them. The beginning of that strife with God is as the letting forth of water; therefore leave it off before it be meddled with. When we are in trouble we are allowed to complain to God, as the Psalmist often, but must by no means complain of God, as Job here.

I. His complaint here of the passing away of the days of his prosperity is proper enough (Job 9:25, Job 9:26): "My days (that is, all my good days) are gone, never to return, gone of a sudden, gone ere I was aware. Never did any courier that went express" (like Cushi and Ahimaaz) "with good tidings make such haste as all my comforts did from me. Never did ship sail to its port, never did eagle fly upon its prey, with such incredible swiftness; nor does there remain any trace of my prosperity, any more than there does of an eagle in the air or a ship in the sea," Pro 30:19. See here, 1. How swift the motion of time is. It is always upon the wing, hastening to its period; it stays for no man. What little need have we of pastimes, and what great need to redeem time, when time runs out, runs on so fast towards eternity, which comes as time goes! 2. How vain the enjoyments of time are, which we may be quite deprived of while yet time continues. Our day may be longer than the sun-shine of our prosperity; and, when that is gone, it is as if it had not been. The remembrance of having done our duty will be pleasing afterwards; so will not the remembrance of our having got a great deal of worldly wealth when it is all lost and gone. "They flee away, past recall; they see no good, and leave none behind them."

II. His complaint of his present uneasiness is excusable, Job 9:27, Job 9:28. 1. It should seem, he did his endeavour to quiet and compose himself as his friends advised him. That was the good he would do: he would fain forget his complaints and praise God, would leave off his heaviness and comfort himself, that he might be fit for converse both with God and man; but, 2. He found he could not do it: "I am afraid of all my sorrows. When I strive most against my trouble it prevails most over me and proves too hard for me!" It is easier, in such a case, to know what we should do than to do it, to know what temper we should be in than to get into that temper and keep in it. It is easy to preach patience to those that are in trouble, and to tell them they must forget their complaints and comfort themselves; but it is not so soon done as said. Fear and sorrow are tyrannizing things, not easily brought into the subjection they ought to be kept in to religion and right reason. But,

III. His complaint of God as implacable and inexorable was by no means to be excused. It was the language of his corruption. He knew better, and, at another time, would have been far from harbouring any such hard thoughts of God as now broke in upon his spirit and broke out in these passionate complaints. Good men do not always speak like themselves; but God, who considers their frame and the strength of their temptations, gives them leave afterwards to unsay what was amiss by repentance and will not lay it to their charge.

1.Job seems to speak here, (1.) As if he despaired of obtaining from God any relief or redress of his grievances, though he should produce ever so good proofs of his integrity: "I know that thou wilt not hold me innocent. My afflictions have continued so long upon me, and increased so fast, that I do not expect thou wilt ever clear up my innocency by delivering me out of them and restoring me to a prosperous condition. Right or wrong, I must be treated as a wicked man; my friends will continue to think so of me, and God will continue upon me the afflictions which give them occasion to think so. Why then do I labour in vain to clear myself and maintain my own integrity?" Job 9:29. It is to no purpose to speak in a cause that is already prejudged. With men it is often labour in vain for the most innocent to go about to clear themselves; they must be adjudged guilty, though the evidence be ever so plain for them. But it is not so in our dealings with God, who is the patron of oppressed innocency and to whom it was never in vain to commit a righteous cause. Nay, he not only despairs of relief, but expects that his endeavour to clear himself will render him yet more obnoxious (Job 9:30, Job 9:31): "If I wash myself with snow-water, and make my integrity ever so evident, it will be all to no purpose; judgment must go against me. Thou shalt plunge me in the ditch" (the pit of destruction, so some, or rather the filthy kennel, or sewer), "which will make me so offensive in the nostrils of all about me that my own clothes shall abhor me and I shall even loathe to touch myself." He saw his afflictions coming from God. Those were the things that blackened him in the eye of his friends; and, upon that score, he complained of them, and of the continuance of them, as the ruin, not only of his comfort, but of his reputation. Yet these words are capable of a good construction. If we be ever so industrious to justify ourselves before men, and to preserve our credit with them, - if we keep our hands ever so clean from the pollutions of gross sin, which fall under the eye of the world, - yet God, who knows our hearts, can charge us with so much secret sin as will for ever take off all our pretensions to purity and innocency, and make us see ourselves odious in the sight of the holy God. Paul, while a Pharisee, made his hands very clean; but when the commandment came and discovered to him his heart-sins, made him know lust, that plunged him in the ditch. (2.) As if he despaired to have a fair hearing with God, and that were hard indeed. [1.] He complains that he was not upon even terms with God (Job 9:32): "He is not a man, as I am. I could venture to dispute with a man like myself (the potsherds may strive with the potsherds of the earth), but he is infinitely above me, and therefore I dare not enter the lists with him; I shall certainly be cast if I contend with him." Note, First, God is not a man as we are. Of the greatest princes we may say, "They are men as we are," but not of the great God. His thoughts and ways are infinitely above ours, and we must not measure him by ourselves. Man is foolish and weak, frail and fickle, but God is not. We are depending dying creatures; he is the independent an immortal Creator. Secondly, The consideration of this should keep us very humble and very silent before God. Let us not make ourselves equal with God, but always eye him as infinitely above us. [2.] That there was no arbitrator or umpire to adjust the differences between him and God and to determine the controversy (Job 9:33): Neither is there any days-man between us. This complaint that there was not is in effect a wish that there were, and so the Septuagint reads it: O that there were a mediator between us! Job would gladly refer the matter, but no creature was capable of being a referee, and therefore he must even refer it still to God himself and resolve to acquiesce in his judgment. Our Lord Jesus is the blessed days-man, who has mediated between heaven and earth, has laid his hand upon us both; to him the Father has committed all judgment, and we must. But this matter was not then brought to so clear a light as it is now by the gospel, which leaves no room for such a complaint as this. [3.] That the terrors of God, which set themselves in array against him, put him into such confusion that he knew not how to address God with the confidence with which he was formerly wont to approach him, Job 9:34, Job 9:35. "Besides the distance which I am kept at by his infinite transcendency, his present dealings with me are very discouraging: Let him take his rod away from me." He means not so much his outward afflictions as the load which lay upon his spirit from the apprehensions of God's wrath; that was his fear which terrified him. "Let that be removed; let me recover the sight of his mercy, and not be amazed with the sight of nothing but his terrors, and then I would speak and order my cause before him. But it is not so with me; the cloud is not at all dissipated; the wrath of God still fastens upon me, and preys on my spirits, as much as ever; and what to do I know not."

2.From all this let us take occasion, (1.) To stand in awe of God, and to fear the power of his wrath. If good men have been put into such consternation by it, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? (2.) To pity those that are wounded in spirit, and pray earnestly for them, because in that condition they know not how to pray for themselves. (3.) Carefully to keep up good thoughts of God in our minds, for hard thoughts of him are the inlets of much mischief. (4.) To bless God that we are not in such a disconsolate condition as poor Job was here in, but that we walk in the light of the Lord; let us rejoice therein, but rejoice with trembling.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 25–35. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
COMMENTARY ON JOB 9:32A
This is what he means, if he who punishes were a man, his punishment would not have entirely condemned the one in affliction. I could have been judged before him and proved that he too is unjust. But since you are God, that is impossible. It is sufficient to be punished and to suffer the greatest condemnation.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 9:33 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.