Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel; I made a covenant with your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondmen, saying,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Thus saith H559 the LORD H3068, the God H430 of Israel H3478; I made H3772 a covenant H1285 with your fathers H1 in the day H3117 that I brought them forth H3318 out of the land H776 of Egypt H4714, out of the house H1004 of bondmen H5650, saying H559,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"Here is what ADONAI the God of Isra'el says: 'When I brought your ancestors out of the land of Egypt, where they lived as slaves, I made this covenant with them:
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: I made a covenant with your forefathers when I brought them out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery, saying:
Ask
American Standard Version
Thus saith Jehovah, the God of Israel: I made a covenant with your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage, saying,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel: I made a covenant with your fathers in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage, saying,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, I made a couenant with your fathers, when I brought them out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of seruants, saying,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
`Thus said Jehovah, God of Israel, I--I made a covenant with your fathers in the day of My bringing them forth from the land of Egypt, from a house of servants, saying,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Jeremiah 34:13 presents a powerful divine declaration from the LORD, the God of Israel, serving as a foundational reminder of His covenant established with their ancestors. This verse vividly recalls the pivotal moment of Israel's liberation from the oppressive "house of bondmen" in Egypt, underscoring God's initiating grace and faithfulness in bringing them into a special relationship. This historical callback is not merely a nostalgic recounting but a potent theological anchor, setting the stage for the subsequent indictment of Judah's contemporary covenant infidelity, particularly their failure to uphold the stipulations regarding the release of Hebrew slaves, thereby justifying the impending divine judgment.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Jeremiah 34:13 is situated within a severe prophetic oracle delivered by Jeremiah during the critical period of Jerusalem's siege by the Babylonian army (circa 588-587 BCE). The immediate literary flow begins with God's direct message to King Zedekiah (Jeremiah 34:1-7), foretelling the city's destruction and Zedekiah's capture. Following this, verses 8-11 describe a brief, crisis-driven act of obedience: Zedekiah and the people make a covenant to release their Hebrew slaves, seemingly adhering to Mosaic law. However, this repentance is short-lived, as they soon re-enslave those they had just freed. Verse 13, therefore, acts as a profound historical and theological indictment. By recalling God's original, foundational covenant at the Exodus, the verse starkly highlights the profound hypocrisy and covenantal breach of the present generation. This divine remembrance amplifies the gravity of their sin and provides the righteous basis for the severe judgments pronounced in the subsequent verses (Jeremiah 34:17-22), where God declares a terrifying "liberty" to the sword, famine, and plague against them for their treachery.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical backdrop is the final days of the Kingdom of Judah, with Jerusalem under siege by Nebuchadnezzar II. King Zedekiah, installed as a puppet ruler by Babylon, had foolishly rebelled, leading to this devastating siege. Slavery was a pervasive institution in the ancient Near East, but the Mosaic Law provided unique and humane regulations for Hebrew slaves, mandating their release after six years of service (as detailed in Exodus 21:2 and Deuteronomy 15:12). The phrase "house of bondmen" powerfully evokes the brutal chattel slavery endured by the Israelites in Egypt, a stark contrast to the more limited and temporary servitude permitted under God's covenant. The people's failure to uphold this specific covenant stipulation, particularly concerning the vulnerable and enslaved, demonstrated a fundamental disregard for God's character as a liberator and His redemptive acts that had established their very identity as a free, covenant people. Their actions mirrored the very oppression from which God had rescued their ancestors.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully articulates several pervasive themes found throughout Jeremiah and the broader Old Testament narrative. Firstly, it underscores Divine Remembrance and Faithfulness, as God explicitly recalls His past redemptive acts and the covenant He initiated, demonstrating His unchanging character and commitment to His word. Secondly, the verse highlights the centrality of Covenant, not merely as a legal document but as a dynamic, relational bond that defines Israel's identity and responsibilities. The "covenant" primarily refers to the Mosaic Covenant, which outlined God's laws and promises, contingent upon Israel's obedience (see Exodus 19). Thirdly, it sharply contrasts Freedom and Bondage, reminding Israel that their liberation from the "house of bondmen" was not merely a physical emancipation but a spiritual one, intended to bring them into a unique, consecrated covenant relationship with YHWH. Finally, the verse implicitly, yet profoundly, introduces the theme of Justice and Social Responsibility. The violation of the covenant, specifically the laws concerning the release of slaves (as seen in Jeremiah 34:8-11), becomes a primary catalyst and justification for God's impending judgment, emphasizing that true covenant faithfulness includes ethical treatment of others.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • LORD (Hebrew, Yᵉhôvâh', H3068): This is the sacred, personal, and covenantal name of God, often transliterated as "Yahweh" or "Jehovah." Derived from the root "to be," it signifies "the self-Existent One" or "the Eternal." In this context, the use of YHWH emphasizes God's unchanging nature, His absolute sovereignty, and His intimate, personal involvement in the history and destiny of Israel. It is the very covenant-keeping God who speaks, lending immense authority, gravitas, and solemnity to His words and the covenant He recalls.
  • covenant (Hebrew, bᵉrîyth', H1285): Derived from a root meaning "to cut," this term refers to a solemn, binding agreement, compact, or treaty. Such agreements were often ratified by a ritual involving the cutting of animals, with both parties passing between the pieces, symbolizing the fate of the one who breaks the pact (as seen in Genesis 15). In Jeremiah 34:13, it specifically refers to the Mosaic Covenant established at Mount Sinai, which comprehensively defined Israel's relationship with God, outlining their obligations (laws, statutes) and His promises (blessings for obedience, curses for disobedience). The term underscores the legally and relationally binding nature of this divine-human pact, which Israel had repeatedly and flagrantly violated.
  • bondmen (Hebrew, ʻebed', H5650): This word signifies a servant, slave, or bondman. The phrase "house of bondmen" (Hebrew: bayith ʻebed) is a powerful and evocative idiom that denotes a state of complete, oppressive servitude and utter powerlessness. Its use here serves as a stark and poignant reminder of the dire, dehumanizing condition from which God miraculously liberated Israel. This emphasizes the sheer magnitude of His redemptive act and highlights the profound contrast between their former state of abject slavery and their new, privileged status as God's free, covenant people, called to reflect His liberating character.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel;": This opening formula is a classic prophetic declaration, immediately establishing the divine authority and unquestionable origin of the message. It signifies that the words are not merely Jeremiah's human insights or opinions, but a direct, authoritative revelation from YHWH, the sovereign and covenant-keeping God who uniquely chose Israel and entered into an exclusive relationship with them. This solemn introduction immediately elevates the gravity and imperative nature of the subsequent declaration.
  • "I made a covenant with your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of the land of Egypt,": This clause serves as a pivotal historical and theological anchor, explicitly recalling the foundational event of Israel's national identity: the Exodus. God emphatically emphasizes His active, sovereign role ("I made," "I brought them forth") in initiating both their miraculous liberation from oppression and the subsequent establishment of the covenant. The "fathers" refers specifically to the generation that personally experienced the Exodus and received the Mosaic Law directly from God at Mount Sinai. This historical reference is not a mere nostalgic recounting but a potent reminder of the very basis of God's claims on His people and their inherent obligations.
  • "out of the house of bondmen, saying,": This phrase vividly describes the oppressive and dehumanizing context from which Israel was definitively delivered, emphasizing the totality and severity of their servitude in Egypt. The repetition of "out of" underscores the complete and decisive nature of God's redemptive act. The concluding "saying" anticipates and points forward to the specific stipulations, commands, and expectations that were an integral part of that original covenant. This sets the immediate stage for God's indictment of their current generation's egregious failure to uphold those very terms, particularly concerning the treatment of the enslaved, thereby revealing their profound hypocrisy.

Literary Devices

Jeremiah 34:13 is rich with effective literary devices that amplify its message. The verse opens with the quintessential Prophetic Formula, "Thus saith the LORD," which immediately signals divine speech and imbues the message with absolute authority and undeniable truth. The passage also employs powerful Historical Allusion, referencing the Exodus and the Sinai covenant, which are the foundational, defining events in Israel's national and religious history. This allusion is not merely descriptive but profoundly Rhetorical, serving to highlight the stark and damning contrast between God's unwavering past faithfulness and Israel's egregious present infidelity. The repetition of the phrase "out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondmen" functions as a form of Anaphora (or a strong parallelism), emphasizing the completeness of their liberation and vividly underscoring the specific nature of their former bondage, thereby reinforcing the immense magnitude of God's redemptive act. This historical reminder also serves as a compelling Argument from Precedent, where God uses His past righteous actions and established covenant to justify His current demands and the severe judgment that is about to befall His disobedient people.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Jeremiah 34:13 profoundly connects God's historical acts of salvation with His ongoing covenant demands, revealing a God who meticulously remembers His promises and righteously expects His people to remember and fulfill their obligations. The Exodus was not merely a physical deliverance from slavery but a transformative spiritual liberation, intended to usher Israel into a unique, consecrated, and intimate relationship with YHWH, their Redeemer. Their subsequent failure to uphold the covenant, particularly the laws concerning justice, compassion, and the treatment of the vulnerable, demonstrated a profound and tragic disconnect from the very character of the God who had so graciously freed them. This verse powerfully underscores the timeless theological principle that divine grace (manifested in their deliverance from Egypt) always precedes and undergirds divine law (the covenant at Sinai), and that true worship and covenant faithfulness necessitate living out the ethical implications of that covenant in all areas of life, especially in matters of social justice and human dignity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Jeremiah 34:13 serves as a profound and challenging reminder that our relationship with God is fundamentally rooted in His initiating grace and the sacred covenants He graciously establishes. Just as God miraculously delivered Israel from the oppressive chains of Egyptian bondage, He continually delivers us from various forms of spiritual, emotional, and relational captivity. This verse compels us to deeply reflect on the "covenants" that define our own lives – most preeminently, the New Covenant of grace established in Christ, but also the implicit covenants we enter into through our commitments, relationships, and responsibilities. Are we living in faithful, grateful obedience to the God who has so wonderfully redeemed us? Do we genuinely remember the immense magnitude of His past mercies and liberating acts when confronted with present temptations to compromise, neglect His commands, or disregard the needs of others, particularly concerning justice and compassion? Our profound freedom in Christ is not merely for our personal benefit but empowers and calls us to live righteously, extend grace, and pursue justice in the world, thereby faithfully reflecting the liberating and just character of our Divine Deliverer.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific ways might we, like the ancient Israelites, be prone to forgetting God's past acts of deliverance and grace when faced with present challenges, temptations, or societal pressures?
  • How does a deep remembrance of God's unwavering covenant faithfulness motivate and empower us to cultivate greater obedience, compassion, and a commitment to justice in our daily lives?
  • What specific "bondage" or forms of spiritual, emotional, or relational captivity has God delivered you from, and how does that profound liberation compel you to live differently in your relationships with God and with others?

FAQ

What is the "covenant" referred to in Jeremiah 34:13?

Answer: The "covenant" referred to in Jeremiah 34:13 is primarily the Mosaic Covenant, which God sovereignly established with the Israelites at Mount Sinai shortly after their miraculous exodus from Egypt. This foundational covenant, meticulously detailed in books like Exodus and Deuteronomy, comprehensively outlined the divine laws, statutes, and ordinances that were to govern Israel's life as God's uniquely chosen people. It was a conditional covenant, promising profound blessings for obedience and severe curses for disobedience, and it formed the foundational agreement for their national identity, spiritual purpose, and relationship with YHWH.

Why does God remind them of the Exodus at this particular time?

Answer: God reminds the people of the Exodus at this critical juncture—during the devastating Babylonian siege of Jerusalem—to highlight their profound hypocrisy, moral blindness, and egregious covenant infidelity. The immediate context of Jeremiah 34 involves King Zedekiah and the people breaking a solemn vow to release their Hebrew slaves, a direct and flagrant violation of the Mosaic Law (e.g., Deuteronomy 15:12-18). By recalling their own miraculous liberation from the "house of bondmen" in Egypt, God powerfully emphasizes the crushing irony and profound injustice of their actions: they, who were once enslaved and delivered by divine grace, were now cruelly enslaving their own kin, demonstrating a complete and utter disregard for the very covenant that defined their freedom and their unique relationship with God. This potent historical reminder serves to righteously justify the severe judgment that is about to befall them.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Jeremiah 34:13, with its profound emphasis on God's unwavering covenant faithfulness and His powerful act of liberating His people from oppressive bondage, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Old Covenant, established at Sinai and so vividly recalled here, served as a divine pointer, foreshadowing a greater, more perfect, and eternally efficacious covenant. Just as God miraculously brought Israel out of the "house of bondmen" in Egypt, Christ, the true and greater Deliverer, liberates humanity from the far more pervasive, insidious, and damning bondage of sin, spiritual death, and the tyranny of the law (as powerfully articulated in Romans 6:6 and Hebrews 2:14-15). He is the divine mediator of a "new covenant" (as majestically prophesied in Jeremiah 31:31-34 and definitively established through His sacrificial blood, as revealed in Luke 22:20). This new covenant, unlike the old, is not merely inscribed on tablets of stone but is supernaturally written on the hearts of believers, enabling true, internal obedience and fostering a profound, intimate, and unbreakable relationship with God. Christ's atoning sacrifice on the cross is the ultimate act of divine liberation, freeing us not just from physical chains but from spiritual slavery, establishing us as beloved children of God and co-heirs of an eternal inheritance (see Galatians 4:7). Thus, the historical deliverance recounted in Jeremiah 34:13 serves as a powerful type and foreshadowing of the spiritual deliverance accomplished by the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

Copy as

Commentary on Jeremiah 34 verses 8–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here another prophecy upon a particular occasion, the history of which we must take notice of, as necessary to give light to the prophecy.

I. When Jerusalem was closely besieged by the Chaldean army the princes and people agreed upon a reformation in one instance, and that was concerning their servants.

1.The law of God was very express, that those of their own nation should not be held in servitude above seven years, but, after they had served one apprenticeship, they should be discharged and have their liberty; yea, though they had sold themselves into servitude for the payment of their debts, or though they were sold by the judges for the punishment of their crimes. This difference was put between their brethren and strangers, that those of other nations taken in war, or bought with money, might be held in perpetual slavery, they and theirs; but their brethren must serve but for seven years at the longest. This God calls the covenant that he had made with them when he brought them out of the land of Egypt, Jer 34:13, Jer 34:14. This was the first of the judicial laws which God gave them (Exo 21:2), and there was good reason for this law. (1.) God had put honour upon that nation, and he would have them thus to preserve the honour of it themselves and to put a difference between it and other nations. (2.) God had brought them out of slavery in Egypt, and he would have them thus to express their grateful sense of that favour, by letting those go to whom their houses were houses of bondage, as Egypt had been to their forefathers. That deliverance is therefore mentioned here (Jer 34:13) as the ground of that law. Note, God's compassions towards us should engage our compassions towards our brethren; we must release as we are released, forgive as we are forgiven, and relieve as we are relieved. And this is called a covenant; for our performance of the duty required is the condition of the continuance of the favours God has bestowed.

2.This law they and their fathers had broken. Their worldly profit swayed more with them than God's command or covenant. When their servants had lived seven years with them they understood their business, and how to apply themselves to it, better than they did when they first came to them, and therefore they would then by no means part with them, though God himself by his law had made them free: Your fathers hearkened not to me in this matter (Jer 34:14), so that from the days of their fathers they had been in this trespass; and they thought they might do it because their fathers did it, and their servants had by disuse lost the benefit of the provision God made for them; whereas against an express law, especially against an express law of God, no custom, usage, nor prescription, is to be admitted in plea. For this sin of theirs, and their fathers, God now brought them into servitude, and justly.

3.When they were besieged, and closely shut in, by the army of the Chaldeans, they, being told of their fault in this matter, immediately reformed, and let go all their servants that were entitled to their freedom by the law of God, as Pharaoh, who, when the plague was upon him, consented to let the people go, and bound themselves in a covenant to do so. (1.) The prophets faithfully admonished them concerning their sin. From them they heard that they should let their Hebrew servants go free, Jer 34:10. They might have read it themselves in the book of the law, but did not, or did not heed it, therefore the prophets told them what the law was. See what need there is of the preaching of the word; people must hear the word preached because they will not make the use they ought to make of the word written. (2.) All orders and degrees of men concurred in this reformation. The king, and the princes, and all the people, agreed to let go their servants, whatever loss or damage they might sustain by so doing. When the king and princes led in this good work the people could not for shame but follow. The example and influence of great men would go very far towards extirpating the most inveterate corruptions. (3.) They bound themselves by a solemn oath and covenant that they would do this, whereby they engaged themselves to God and one another. Note, What God has bound us to by his precept, it is good for us to bind ourselves to by our promise. This covenant was very solemn: it was made in a sacred place, made before me, in the house which is called by my name (Jer 34:15), in the special presence of God, the tokens of which, in the temple, ought to strike an awe upon them and make them very sincere in their appeals to him. It was ratified by a significant sign; they cut a calf in two, and passed between the parts thereof (Jer 34:18, Jer 34:19) with this dreadful imprecation, "Let us be in like manner cut asunder if we do not perform what we now promise." This calf was probably offered up in sacrifice to God, who was thereby made a party to the covenant. When God covenanted with Abraham, for the ratification of it, a smoking furnace and a burning lamp passed between the pieces of the sacrifice, in allusion to this federal rite, Gen 15:17. Note, In order that we may effectually oblige ourselves to our duty, it is good to alarm ourselves with the apprehensions of the terror of the wrath and curse to which we expose ourselves if we live in the contempt of it, that wrath which will cut sinners asunder (Mat 24:51), and sensible signs may be of use to make the impressions of it deep and durable, as here. (4.) They conformed themselves herein to the command of God and their covenant with him; they did let their servants go, though at this time, when the city was besieged, they could very ill spare them. Thus they did right in God's sight, Jer 34:15. Though it was their trouble that drove them to it, yet he was well pleased with it; and if they had persevered in this act of mercy to the poor, to their poor servants, it might have been a lengthening of their tranquillity, Dan 4:27.

II. When there was some hope that the siege was raised and the danger over they repented of their repentance, undid the good they had done, and forced the servants they had released into their respective services again. 1. The king of Babylon's army had now gone up from them, Jer 34:21. Pharaoh was bringing an army of Egyptians to oppose the progress of the king of Babylon's victories, upon the tidings of which the Chaldeans raised the siege for a time, as we find, Jer 37:5. They departed from Jerusalem. See how ready God was to put a stop to his judgments, upon the first instance of reformation, so slow is he to anger and so swift to show mercy. As soon as ever they let their servants go free God let them go free. 2. When they began to think themselves safe from the besiegers they made their servants come back into subjection to them, Jer 34:11, and again Jer 34:16. This was a great abuse to their servants, to whom servitude would be more irksome, after they had had some taste of the pleasures of liberty. It was a great shame to themselves that they could not keep in a good mind when they were in it. But it was especially an affront to God; in doing this they polluted his name, Jer 34:16. It was a contempt of the command he had given them, as if that were of no force at all, but they might either keep it or break it as they thought fit. It was a contempt of the covenant they had made with him, and of that wrath which they had imprecated upon themselves in case they should break that covenant. It was jesting with God almighty, as if he could be imposed upon by fallacious promises, which, when they had gained their point, they would look upon themselves no longer obliged by. it was lying to God with their mouths and flattering him with their tongues. It was likewise a contempt of the judgments of God and setting them at defiance; as if, when once the course of them was stopped a little and interrupted, they would never proceed again and the judgment would never be revived; whereas reprieves are so far from being pardons that if they be abused thus, and sinners take encouragement from them to return to sin, they are but preparatives for heavier strokes of divine vengeance.

III. For this treacherous dealing with God they are here severely threatened. Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Those that think to put a cheat upon God by a dissembled repentance, a fallacious covenant, and a partial temporary reformation, will prove in the end to have put the greatest cheat upon their own souls; for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God. it is here threatened, with an observable air of displeasure against them, 1. That, since they had not given liberty to their servants to go where they pleased, God would give all his judgments liberty to take their course against them without control (Jer 34:17): You have not proclaimed liberty to your servants. Though they had done it (Jer 34:10), yet they might truly be said not to have done it, because they did not stand to it, but undid it again; and factum non dicitur quod non perseverat - that is not said to be done which does not last. The righteousness that is forsaken and turned away from shall be forgotten, and not mentioned any more than if it had never been, Eze 18:24. "Therefore I will proclaim a liberty for you; I will discharge you from my service, and put you out of my protection, which those forfeit that withdraw from their allegiance. You shall have liberty to choose which of these judgments you will be cut off by, sword, famine, or pestilence;" such a liberty as was offered to David, which put him into a great strait, Sa2 24:14. Note, Those that will not be in subjection to the law of God put themselves into subjection to the wrath and curse of God. But this shows what liberty to sin really - it is but a liberty to the sorest judgments. 2. That, since they had brought their servants back into confinement in their houses, God would make them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth, where they should live in servitude, and, being strangers, could not expect the privileges of free-born subjects. 3. That, since they had broken the covenant which they ratified by a solemn imprecation, God would bring on them the evil which they imprecated upon themselves in case they should break it. out of their own mouth will he judge them, and so shall their doom be; the penalty of their bond shall be recovered, because they have not performed the condition; for so some read Jer 34:18, "I will make the men which have transgressed my covenant as the calf which they cut in twain; I will divide them asunder as they divided it asunder." 4. That, since they would not let go their servants out of the hands, God would deliver them into the hands of those that hated them, even the princes and nobles both of Judah and Jerusalem (of the country and of the city), the eunuchs (chamberlains, or great officers of the court), the priests, and all the people, Jer 34:19. They had all dealt treacherously with God, and therefore shall all be involved in the common ruin without exception. They shall all be given unto the hand of their enemies, that seek, not their wealth only, or their service, but their life, and they shall have what they seek; but neither shall that content them: when they have their lives they shall leave their dead bodies unburied, a loathsome spectacle to all mankind and an easy prey to the fowls and beasts, a lasting mark of ignominy being hereby fastened on them, Jer 34:20. 5. That, since they had emboldened themselves in returning to their sin, contrary to their covenant, by the retreat of the Chaldean army from them, God would therefore bring it upon them again: "They have now gone up from you, and your fright is over for the present, but I will command them to face about as they were; they shall return to this city, and take it and burn it," Jer 34:22. Note, (1.) As confidence in God is a hopeful presage of approaching deliverance, so security in sin is a sad omen of approaching destruction. (2.) When judgments are removed from a people before they have done their work, leave them, but leave them unhumbled and unreformed, it is cum animo revertendi - with a design to return; they do but retreat to come on again with so much the greater force; for when God judges he will overcome. (3.) It is just with God to disappoint those expectations of mercy which his providence had given cause for when we disappoint those expectations of duty which our professions, pretensions, and fair promises, had given cause for. If we repent of the good we had purposed, God will repent of the good he had purposed. With the froward thou will show thyself froward.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–22. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER SEVEN
[Daniel 7:1] "In the first year of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, Daniel beheld a dream. And a vision of his head upon his bed. And when he wrote the dream down, he comprehended it in a few words and gave a brief summary of it, saying..." This section which we now undertake to explain, and also the subsequent section which we are going to discuss, is historically prior to the two previous sections. For this present section and that which follows it are recorded to have taken place in the first and third years of the reign of King Belshazzar (Jeremiah 39) [Jerome's citation of Jeremiah 39 seems quite pointless in this connection]. But the section which we read previously to the one just preceding this, is recorded to have taken place in the last year, indeed on the final day, of Belshaz-zar's reign. And we meet this phenomenon not only in Daniel but also in Jeremiah [cf. Jeremiah 35 and Jeremiah 34] and Ezekiel (Ezekiel 17), as we shall be able to show, if life spares us that long. But in the earlier portion of the book, the historical order has been followed, namely the events which occurred in the time of Nebuchadnezzar, and Belshazzar, and Darius or Cyrus. But in the passages now before us an account is given of various visions which were beheld on particular occasions and of which only the prophet himself was aware, and which therefore lacked any importance as signs or revelations so far as the barbarian nations were concerned. But they were written down only that a record of the things beheld might be preserved for posterity.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Jeremiah 34:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.