Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
That she called unto the men of her house, and spake unto them, saying, See, he hath brought in an Hebrew unto us to mock us; he came in unto me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
That she called H7121 unto the men H582 of her house H1004, and spake H559 unto them, saying H559, See H7200, he hath brought in H935 an Hebrew H376 H5680 unto us to mock H6711 us; he came in H935 unto me to lie H7901 with me, and I cried H7121 with a loud H1419 voice H6963:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
she called the men of her house and said to them, "Look at this! My husband brought in a Hebrew to make fools of us. He came in and wanted to sleep with me, but I yelled out loudly.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
she called her household servants. “Look,” she said, “this Hebrew has been brought to us to make sport of us. He came to me so he could sleep with me, but I screamed as loud as I could.
Ask
American Standard Version
that she called unto the men of her house, and spake unto them, saying, See, he hath brought in a Hebrew unto us to mock us: he came in unto me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
she called to the men of her house, and spoke to them, saying, “Behold, he has brought in a Hebrew to us to mock us. He came in to me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
She called vnto the men of her house, and tolde them, saying, Beholde, he hath brought in an Ebrewe vnto vs to mocke vs: who came in to me for to haue slept with me: but I cryed with a loude voyce.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
that she calleth for the men of her house, and speaketh to them, saying, `See, he hath brought in to us a man, a Hebrew, to play with us; he hath come in unto me, to lie with me, and I call with a loud voice,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Genesis 37:12-36, Genesis 39:1-23, Genesis 42:1-26, Genesis 42:27-38, Genesis 43:1-34, Genesis 45:1-28, Genesis 46:1-27, Genesis 46:28-47:12, Genesis 47:27-31, Genesis 49:29-50:14, Genesis 50:15-21, Genesis 50:22-25
Genesis 37:12-36, Genesis 39:1-23, Genesis 42:1-26, Genesis 42:27-38, Genesis 43:1-34, Genesis 45:1-28, Genesis 46:1-27, Genesis 46:28-47:12, Genesis 47:27-31, Genesis 49:29-50:14, Genesis 50:15-21, Genesis 50:22-25 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 1,164 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 39:14 vividly portrays the calculated deceit of Potiphar's wife following Joseph's flight from her attempted seduction. Enraged by his unwavering integrity and refusal to compromise, she immediately orchestrates a public spectacle, summoning her household servants to witness her fabricated narrative. She maliciously frames Joseph, derogatorily labeling him "an Hebrew," and falsely accuses him of attempted assault, claiming she cried out to repel him. This pivotal verse starkly illuminates the destructive power of slander, the profound injustice faced by the righteous, and the calculated manipulation of truth for self-preservation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated at a critical juncture in the larger narrative of Joseph, following his sale into slavery by his brothers and his subsequent rise to prominence in Potiphar's household. The preceding verses (Genesis 39:1-10) establish Joseph's exceptional character, his prosperity under God's favor, and Potiphar's complete trust in him. Crucially, they detail Potiphar's wife's persistent attempts to seduce Joseph and his steadfast refusal, culminating in his flight from her grasp in Genesis 39:12. Verse 14 marks her immediate, vengeful response to his rejection, setting the stage for Joseph's unjust imprisonment in Genesis 39:20. This incident is a pivotal turning point, moving Joseph from a position of domestic authority to the confines of a prison, yet still under God's sovereign hand.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Egypt, the household of a high-ranking official like Potiphar would have been a complex social structure, with various servants and slaves. The master's wife held significant authority within this domain. Accusations of sexual misconduct, especially by a male slave against the master's wife, would have been taken extremely seriously and could carry severe penalties, including death. The term "Hebrew" (H5680) would have identified Joseph as a foreigner, likely viewed with some suspicion or disdain by Egyptians, who generally considered shepherds and those from foreign lands to be inferior or even an abomination (Genesis 46:34). Potiphar's wife's use of this ethnic label was a deliberate tactic to dehumanize Joseph and appeal to existing xenophobia, making her fabricated story more believable and inflammatory to her Egyptian audience.

  • Key Themes: Genesis 39:14 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. It powerfully illustrates the theme of integrity and righteousness under pressure, as Joseph chooses faithfulness to God over personal comfort or safety, even when it leads to suffering (Genesis 39:9). The verse also highlights the destructive nature of sin and deceit, showcasing how unbridled lust and pride can lead to malicious slander and false accusation. Furthermore, it underscores the theme of God's sovereignty amidst injustice, demonstrating that even through profound betrayal and wrongful imprisonment, God remains in control, working His purposes through seemingly adverse circumstances, a truth powerfully articulated later by Joseph in Genesis 50:20.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Genesis 39:14 details the immediate, calculated, and public deception orchestrated by Potiphar's wife after Joseph's flight. Her words are a carefully constructed lie designed to incriminate Joseph and protect her own reputation.

Key Word Analysis

  • Hebrew (Hebrew, ʻIbrîy', H5680): This term, a patronymic from Eber, refers to Joseph's ethnic identity as a descendant of Eber. In this context, Potiphar's wife uses it not merely as a descriptor but as a derogatory label. By calling Joseph "an Hebrew," she weaponizes his foreignness, appealing to the potential xenophobia of her Egyptian household. It serves to "other" Joseph, stripping him of his individuality and reducing him to a stereotype, thereby making her false accusation more palatable and inflammatory to her audience.
  • mock (Hebrew, tsâchaq', H6711): This primitive root means "to laugh outright," "to sport," or "to make sport of." While it can denote innocent play, in this context, it carries a strong connotation of scorn, ridicule, or humiliation. By claiming Joseph came "to mock us," she elevates his alleged sexual transgression from a private act to a public insult against the entire household, implying a deliberate act of contempt and disrespect that would warrant severe punishment.
  • voice (Hebrew, qôwl', H6963): This word refers to a sound, cry, or voice. Coupled with "loud" (H1419, gâdôwl), it describes the performative aspect of her lie. Her claim to have cried "with a loud voice" is her fabricated "evidence" of resistance and distress. It's an attempt to manufacture a scene of victimhood, implying she fought off an aggressor, directly contradicting Joseph's actual flight and refusal to sin.

Verse Breakdown

  • "That she called unto the men of her house, and spake unto them, saying,": This opening clause establishes the deliberate and public nature of her actions. By summoning her male servants, she ensures witnesses to her fabricated account, lending it an air of credibility and setting the stage for a formal accusation rather than a private complaint. This is a calculated performance designed to manipulate perception.
  • "See, he hath brought in an Hebrew unto us to mock us;": This is the first part of her accusation, loaded with prejudice and calculated insult. Her use of "an Hebrew" rather than Joseph's name is a dehumanizing act, emphasizing his foreign status. The accusation that he was brought in "to mock us" (referring to the household, not just her) frames Joseph's alleged actions as a profound disrespect and humiliation against the entire Egyptian household, escalating the perceived offense beyond a mere sexual impropriety.
  • "he came in unto me to lie with me, and I cried with a loud voice:": This is the core of her false accusation. She fabricates the attempted assault, directly contradicting Joseph's flight. The addition of "and I cried with a loud voice" is her manufactured proof of resistance and distress. This detail is intended to corroborate her story, painting herself as a virtuous woman fighting off an aggressor, thereby making her lie more believable to her audience.

Literary Devices

Genesis 39:14 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its powerful message. Irony is prominent, as Potiphar's wife, the true aggressor, portrays herself as the victim, while Joseph, the innocent party, is cast as the perpetrator. Her accusation of Joseph coming "to mock us" is a form of projection, as her own actions are a mockery of truth and justice. The specific use of "an Hebrew" demonstrates prejudice and othering, a rhetorical tactic to dehumanize Joseph and exploit existing biases within her audience. The phrase "I cried with a loud voice" is an example of pathos, an appeal to emotion, designed to elicit sympathy and outrage from her listeners, despite being a complete fabrication. This scene also serves as foreshadowing, hinting at the greater injustices Joseph will face and the trials he must endure before his ultimate elevation, a pattern that will later find its ultimate fulfillment in Christ.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 39:14 offers profound theological insights into the nature of sin, the cost of righteousness, and God's sovereign hand. Potiphar's wife's actions exemplify how unrepentant sin, specifically lust and pride, can rapidly escalate into further moral corruption, leading to malicious slander and false witness in an attempt to cover one's own transgression. Her deceit highlights the insidious way sin seeks to hide itself through further moral compromise. Conversely, Joseph's steadfast refusal to sin against God, even when it leads directly to profound suffering and false accusation, powerfully underscores the biblical theme of integrity and faithfulness. His commitment to righteousness, even at great personal cost, serves as a testament to his character and his deep reverence for God. This incident also points to God's mysterious yet perfect sovereignty; despite the profound injustice Joseph faces, this moment is not outside God's divine plan, but rather a crucial step in His unfolding purpose for Joseph and for the salvation of many.

  • Exodus 20:16 - This commandment directly condemns bearing false witness, which Potiphar's wife flagrantly violates.
  • Psalm 105:17-19 - This passage explicitly states that God sent Joseph ahead of his people and that he was unjustly bound, highlighting God's sovereign control over seemingly unjust circumstances.
  • Proverbs 6:16-19 - This passage lists "a lying tongue" and "a false witness who breathes out lies" among the things God detests, directly condemning the actions of Potiphar's wife.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 39:14 serves as a sobering mirror, reflecting the realities of a fallen world where integrity is often met with hostility and truth is twisted for selfish gain. For believers, this verse offers profound lessons: first, that living righteously does not guarantee freedom from suffering, injustice, or false accusation. Like Joseph, we may find ourselves in situations where our commitment to God's standards leads to personal cost, even imprisonment or reputational damage. In such moments, our steadfastness becomes a powerful, if painful, testimony to our faith. Second, it calls us to cultivate discernment, to be wary of those who manipulate truth and to stand firm against the tide of slander. We are challenged to be people who not only speak truth but also defend the innocent, refusing to participate in gossip or the perpetuation of falsehoods. Ultimately, this passage encourages us to trust in God's sovereign plan, knowing that even when injustice prevails in the short term, He is working all things for His ultimate good and our sanctification.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Joseph's response to temptation, and subsequent false accusation, challenge my understanding of what it means to live righteously in a hostile environment?
  • In what ways might I be tempted to twist the truth or engage in slander to protect my own reputation or interests?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper trust in God's sovereignty when faced with profound injustice, whether personally or observed in the world?
  • What steps can I take to be a defender of truth and justice, rather than a passive observer or unwitting participant in falsehoods?

FAQ

Why did Potiphar's wife call Joseph "an Hebrew" instead of using his name?

Answer: Calling Joseph "an Hebrew" was a deliberate and derogatory tactic. It served to emphasize his foreignness and "otherness" to her Egyptian household, appealing to their potential prejudices and making her fabricated story about a disrespectful outsider more believable and inflammatory. By stripping him of his individual identity and reducing him to a racial stereotype, she sought to dehumanize him and justify her false accusation in the eyes of her servants and, subsequently, her husband. This was a calculated move to manipulate public perception and ensure Joseph's condemnation.

What is the significance of her claim, "I cried with a loud voice"?

Answer: This detail is a crucial, manufactured piece of "evidence" in her fabricated narrative, designed to provide false proof of her resistance and victimhood. By claiming she "cried with a loud voice," she sought to establish that she fought off Joseph, implying distress, fear, and innocence. This assertion was intended to make her accusation of attempted assault more credible to her servants and to Potiphar, painting herself as a virtuous woman who was attacked, directly contradicting Joseph's actual flight and refusal to sin. It was a performative act to solidify her lie.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Joseph's experience in Genesis 39:14, marked by his unwavering integrity in the face of temptation, his subsequent false accusation, and his unjust suffering, serves as a profound and poignant foreshadowing of the life and mission of Jesus Christ. Like Joseph, Jesus was entirely innocent, yet He endured baseless accusations and malicious slander from those in positions of authority, as vividly depicted in the Gospel accounts of His trial (e.g., Matthew 26:59-60 and Mark 14:56-59). Both Joseph and Christ maintained perfect integrity and righteousness in the face of immense pressure and profound injustice, refusing to compromise their faithfulness to God. Joseph's suffering, though unjust, ultimately led to his elevation to power and the salvation of his family and many others from famine, demonstrating God's ability to use evil intentions for His redemptive purposes. In a far greater and ultimate way, Christ's innocent suffering and death on the cross, the ultimate act of injustice, led to His glorious resurrection and the eternal salvation of all who believe (as proclaimed in Romans 5:8 and 1 Peter 2:24). Through His perfect obedience and sacrifice, Jesus fulfilled God's redemptive plan, bringing life and reconciliation out of apparent defeat, just as Joseph's unjust imprisonment ultimately led to widespread deliverance.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 39 verses 13–18

Joseph's mistress, having tried in vain to make him a criminal, now endeavours to represent him as one; so to be revenged on him for his virtue. Now was her love turned into the utmost rage and malice, and she pretends she cannot endure the sight of him whom awhile ago she could not endure out of her sight. Chaste and holy love will continue, though slighted; but sinful love, like Amnon's to Tamar, is easily changed into sinful hatred. 1. She accused him to his fellow servants (Gen 39:13-15) and gave him a bad name among them. Probably they envied him his interest in their master's favour, and his authority in the house; and perhaps found themselves aggrieved sometimes by his fidelity, which prevented their purloining; and therefore they were glad to hear any thing that might tend to his disgrace, and, if there was room for it, incensed their mistress yet more against him. Observe, When she speaks of her husband, she does not call him her husband, or her lord, but only he; for she had forgotten the covenant of her God, that was between them. Thus the adulteress (Pro 7:19) calls her husband the good man. Note, Innocence itself cannot secure a man's reputation. Not every one that keeps a good conscience can keep a good name. 2. She accused him to his master, who had power in his hand to punish him, which his fellow servants had not, Gen 39:17, Gen 39:18. Observe, (1.) What an improbable story she tells, producing his garment as an evidence that he had offered violence to her, which was a plain indication that she had offered violence to him. Note, Those that have broken the bonds of modesty will never be held by the bonds of truth. No marvel that she who had impudence enough to say, Lie with me, had front enough to say, "He would have lien with me." Had the lie been told to conceal her own crime it would have been bad enough, yet, in some degree, excusable; but it was told to be revenged upon his virtue, a most malicious lie. And yet, (2.) She manages it so as to incense her husband against him, reflecting upon him for bringing this Hebrew servant among them, perhaps at first against her mind, because he was a Hebrew. Note, It is no new thing for the best of men to be falsely accused of the worst of crimes by those who themselves are the worst of criminals. As this matter was represented, one would have thought chaste Joseph a very bad man and his wanton mistress a virtuous woman; it is well that there is a day of discovery coming, in which all shall appear in their true characters. This was not the first time that Joseph's coat was made use of as a false witness concerning him; his father had been deceived by it before, now his master.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–18. Public domain.
Copy as
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On Joseph the Patriarch
Indeed, Joseph went out of doors while she spread the news of the temptation that arose from her own adultery; she said in a loud voice that the Hebrew had fled and left his garment behind. Thus she revealed what she should have concealed, so as to do harm to an innocent man by inventing a crime. But the just man Joseph did not know how to make accusation, and so the impure woman accomplished this with impunity. Therefore I might say that she was the one who had really been stripped, although she was keeping the clothing of another. She had lost all the coverings of chastity, whereas he was sufficiently provided for and protected; his voice was not heard, and yet his blamelessness spoke for itself.
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON GENESIS 62.20
But despite such a victory, despite such wonderful fortitude for which Joseph ought to have been rewarded, for which he ought to have been extolled, once more he endures countless troubles as though a guilty party. You see, the Egyptian woman did not take kindly at that stage to her shame and insult brought on herself by attempting the impossible. First she summoned those in the household and accused the young man and tried to mislead them all by claiming that the commands given by her in her frenzy had been uttered by him. This, in fact, is the way with wickedness, that it endeavors to attribute its own faults to the virtue that is under attack. That is exactly what she did in this case, portraying the young man as incontinent and giving herself the guise of chastity, saying that was the reason he had abandoned his clothes and she was left with them.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
GLAPHYRA ON GENESIS, 6
When Joseph was still young and at the end of his adolescence, he overcame the impudence of the Egyptian woman, even though he was dragged with great force to commit what was not lawful. In fact, this woman arguing with him impudently took the clothes off him and urged him to sin against his will. Actually he escaped from the furious lust of the woman after abandoning his cloak and could not be defeated by her strong will. Therefore he was accused of that action, since the woman turned the fault to him. In that dishonorable accusation, however, Joseph demonstrated great modesty and nobility. And he was thrown into the prison. Christ also was among the pagans, especially in the person of the holy apostles, who declared that they carried around on their own body his scars. They did not want to adjust themselves to those things that belong to the world but kept away from any desire of the flesh. And such is always the life of the saints. Therefore, for this reason, they were the object of many plots and were oppressed by the slander of those who were accustomed to regard those who wanted to live in Christ as unbearable, so that they fell into tremendous temptations and were imprisoned. However, they always bore in mind Christ’s saying: “If you belonged to the world, the world would love you as its own. Because you do not belong to the world, therefore the world hates you,” exactly as the lustful woman hated Joseph.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 39:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.