Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Cush H3568 begat H3205 Nimrod H5248: he began H2490 to be H1961 a mighty one H1368 in the earth H776.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Kush fathered Nimrod, who was the first powerful ruler on earth.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Cush was the father of Nimrod, who began to be a mighty one on the earth.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Cush became the father of Nimrod. He began to be a mighty one in the earth.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Cush begate Nimrod, who began to be mightie in the earth.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Cush hath begotten Nimrod;
Ask
See also
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
The Table of Nations
The Table of Nations View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 243 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 10:8 introduces Nimrod, a direct descendant of Noah through Ham and Cush, as the first individual explicitly designated a "mighty one" in the post-Flood world. This verse marks a pivotal transition within the "Table of Nations" from a purely genealogical enumeration to the emergence of powerful human leadership and the establishment of early societal structures and kingdoms, thereby setting the stage for subsequent narratives of human ambition, dominion, and the formation of distinct nations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Genesis 10, often referred to as the "Table of Nations," meticulously chronicles the descendants of Noah's three sons—Shem, Ham, and Japheth—detailing the repopulation of the earth after the great Flood. This chapter serves as a genealogical bridge between the universal judgment of the Flood and the particularistic narratives of Abraham and Israel. Within this comprehensive list, Genesis 10:8 stands out because it breaks from the typical "X begat Y" formula to provide an extended, descriptive account of Nimrod's character and actions in the subsequent verses Genesis 10:9-12. This deviation signals Nimrod's unique and significant role, marking him as more than just another name in a lineage, but as a foundational figure in the development of early human power structures and organized societies. His introduction here prepares the reader for the narrative of the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11, which further explores themes of human unity, ambition, and divine intervention.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The post-Flood world, as depicted in Genesis, was a nascent society beginning to re-establish itself. Humanity, having been drastically reduced, was tasked with multiplying and filling the earth Genesis 9:1. In this context, the emergence of powerful individuals capable of organizing communities, providing protection, and leading large-scale endeavors would have been a natural, albeit potentially problematic, development. The term "mighty one" (Hebrew: gibbor) would have resonated with ancient Near Eastern concepts of heroic leaders, warriors, and kings who established dominion over territories and peoples. This era saw the rise of the earliest city-states in Mesopotamia, such as those mentioned in connection with Nimrod in Genesis 10:10, including Babel (Babylon), Erech (Uruk), Accad (Akkad), and Calneh. Nimrod's description thus reflects the historical reality of powerful figures consolidating authority and founding the first urban centers and proto-empires.
  • Key Themes: Genesis 10:8 contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights the emergence of human power and leadership beyond familial structures, marking a shift towards centralized authority and political organization. Secondly, it introduces the theme of human ambition and dominion, raising questions about how humanity exercises the mandate to "subdue the earth" Genesis 1:28. Nimrod's might, particularly when viewed in light of his potential connection to the Tower of Babel, foreshadows the recurring biblical theme of human pride and rebellion against divine sovereignty. Lastly, this verse subtly introduces the tension between divine order and human self-assertion, a tension that will be fully explored in subsequent narratives, as human kingdoms rise and often challenge God's ultimate authority.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • begat (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): A primitive root meaning "to bear young; causatively, to beget." In this context, it signifies the act of fathering, establishing the direct lineage of Nimrod from Cush. This term is fundamental to the genealogical structure of Genesis, emphasizing the continuity of generations and the fulfillment of God's command to multiply.
  • began (Hebrew, châlal', H2490): A primitive root meaning "to bore, i.e. (by implication) to wound, to dissolve; figuratively, to profane... to begin (as if by an 'opening wedge')." Here, it carries the sense of initiation or commencement. Nimrod's might was not inherent from birth but was something he actively initiated or cultivated, implying a deliberate and perhaps forceful assertion of power. This "beginning" suggests a new era of human enterprise and ambition.
  • mighty one (Hebrew, gibbôwr', H1368): An intensive form meaning "powerful; by implication, warrior, tyrant." This term denotes a person of exceptional strength, valor, or influence. It can refer to a champion, a chief, or a valiant man. In Nimrod's case, it signifies not merely physical prowess but a commanding presence, leadership, and military capability that enabled him to establish dominion and found kingdoms, setting him apart as a dominant figure in the early post-Flood world.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Cush begat Nimrod": This clause establishes Nimrod's lineage within the Table of Nations, identifying him as the son of Cush, who was a son of Ham. This genealogical placement is crucial, as it situates Nimrod within the Hamitic line, a lineage often associated with the peoples who settled in Africa and parts of the Middle East, and later with nations that would come into conflict with Israel. The simple "begat" formula, typical of the chapter, sets the stage for the unique description that follows.
  • "he began to be": This phrase, employing the Hebrew verb châlal, indicates a process of initiation or development rather than an inherent state. Nimrod's might was not a birthright but something he actively pursued and cultivated. It implies a dynamic assertion of power, a proactive move to establish dominance and influence in the emerging post-Flood world. This "beginning" suggests a foundational moment for his subsequent actions.
  • "a mighty one": The Hebrew term gibbor describes Nimrod as a powerful individual, a warrior, or a hero. This designation distinguishes him from his contemporaries, highlighting his exceptional strength, leadership qualities, and perhaps military prowess. He is the first person in the post-Flood narrative to be explicitly labeled with this significant title, underscoring his unique status and impact.
  • "in the earth": This concluding phrase specifies the scope of Nimrod's might and influence. His power was not confined to a small tribe or family unit but extended broadly across the land, indicating a significant sphere of dominion and the establishment of a wider authority. This sets the stage for his role as a kingdom-builder, as detailed in the subsequent verses.

Literary Devices

Genesis 10:8 masterfully employs Character Introduction and Foreshadowing. The verse serves as a direct and impactful introduction to Nimrod, breaking the otherwise uniform genealogical rhythm of the "Table of Nations" to highlight his unique significance. This immediate focus on his character, rather than just his lineage, signals to the reader that he is a figure of particular importance. Furthermore, the description of him as beginning "to be a mighty one in the earth" functions as potent Foreshadowing. It hints at his future actions and influence, preparing the reader for the subsequent verses that detail his prowess as a hunter and kingdom-builder Genesis 10:9-12, and potentially his involvement in the audacious project of the Tower of Babel. The unusual emphasis on an individual within a genealogical list creates a sense of anticipation and underscores the profound impact Nimrod would have on the early post-Flood world.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 10:8, by introducing Nimrod as the first "mighty one" in the post-Flood world, marks a significant theological shift from the family-centric structures of early humanity to the emergence of centralized human power and organized kingdoms. This verse subtly introduces the complex theme of human dominion, initially given by God in Genesis 1:28 to subdue the earth, but now seen through the lens of individual ambition and the potential for self-exaltation. Nimrod's rise prompts reflection on the nature of power—whether it is wielded in submission to divine will or in defiance of it. His story, especially when read in conjunction with the subsequent narrative of the Tower of Babel, often serves as a cautionary tale about human pride and the dangers of seeking greatness apart from God, foreshadowing the recurring biblical pattern of powerful human empires challenging divine authority.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 10:8, in its concise introduction of Nimrod, offers a profound lens through which to examine the enduring human pursuit of power and influence. It challenges us to consider the source and purpose of our own "might," whether it be intellectual, social, financial, or spiritual. Are we, like Nimrod, seeking to establish our own kingdoms and assert our will "in the earth" for personal glory, or are we leveraging our strengths and positions to serve God's purposes and build His kingdom? The passage calls us to a critical self-assessment: do our ambitions align with divine principles of humility, service, and justice, or do they lean towards self-aggrandizement and a potential defiance of God's ultimate sovereignty? Nimrod's story serves as a timeless reminder that true might is not merely about capacity or achievement, but about character and the ultimate direction of one's power—whether it leads to blessing or to the very kind of human hubris that often precedes divine judgment.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Nimrod's ambition to be a "mighty one" challenge or affirm God's original mandate for humanity to have dominion over the earth?
  • In what ways might we, in our modern context, be tempted to pursue "might" or influence for self-glorification rather than for God's glory and the good of others?
  • What qualities define a "mighty one" in God's eyes, and how do they differ from the world's definition of power and success?

FAQ

Who was Nimrod and why is he significant?

Answer: Nimrod was a descendant of Noah through Ham and Cush, and he is the first individual explicitly described in the Bible as a "mighty one" (gibbor) on earth after the Flood. His significance lies in his role as a powerful leader and the founder of early kingdoms, including Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, as detailed in Genesis 10:10. His emergence marks a crucial shift from purely genealogical listings to the development of organized human power structures and ambitious, centralized governance in the nascent post-diluvian world.

What does "he began to be a mighty one in the earth" imply about Nimrod's character or rise to power?

Answer: This phrase, utilizing the Hebrew verb châlal ("to begin"), suggests that Nimrod's might was not an inherent quality from birth but something he actively developed, asserted, or initiated. It implies a proactive and deliberate pursuit of power, influence, and potentially military strength, signifying his role in establishing himself as a dominant figure. The term "mighty one" (gibbor) indicates a powerful warrior, hero, or leader, suggesting that Nimrod distinguished himself through strength, valor, and the ability to command and organize, laying the groundwork for his kingdom-building endeavors mentioned in Genesis 10:9-12.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Genesis 10:8 introduces Nimrod as an earthly "mighty one" whose power was self-asserted and potentially rebellious, his story ultimately points to the true and ultimate "Mighty One," Jesus Christ. Nimrod's ambition to build earthly kingdoms and establish dominion through human strength stands in stark contrast to Christ's humble incarnation and redemptive mission. Unlike Nimrod, who sought to consolidate power "in the earth" for what appears to be self-glorification and possibly defiance against God's plan for human dispersion (as suggested by his association with the Tower of Babel), Jesus, though truly gibbor as the Son of God and the "Mighty God" Isaiah 9:6, exercised His power not for earthly conquest but for spiritual salvation. He came not to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many Mark 10:45. Through His sacrificial death and glorious resurrection, Christ established a spiritual kingdom that is "not of this world" John 18:36, offering eternal dominion and true life to all who believe in Him. He is the ultimate King who subdues sin and death, fulfilling God's original purpose for humanity's dominion in a way that Nimrod's earthly might could never achieve, ultimately reigning with all authority in heaven and on earth Matthew 28:18.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 10 verses 6–14

That which is observable and improvable in these verses is the account here given of Nimrod, Gen 10:8-10. He is here represented as a great man in his day: He began to be a mighty one in the earth, that is, whereas those that went before him were content to stand upon the same level with their neighbours, and though every man bore rule in his own house yet no man pretended any further, Nimrod's aspiring mind could not rest here; he was resolved to tower above his neighbours, not only to be eminent among them, but to lord it over them. The same spirit that actuated the giants before the flood (who became mighty men, and men of renown, Gen 6:4), now revived in him, so soon was that tremendous judgment which the pride and tyranny of those mighty men brought upon the world forgotten. Note, There are some in whom ambition and affectation of dominion seem to be bred in the bone; such there have been and will be, notwithstanding the wrath of God often revealed from heaven against them. Nothing on this side hell will humble and break the proud spirits of some men, in this like Lucifer, Isa 14:14, Isa 14:15. Now,

I. Nimrod was a great hunter; with this he began, and for this became famous to a proverb. Every great hunter is, in remembrance of him, called a Nimrod. 1. Some think he did good with his hunting, served his country by ridding it of the wild beasts which infested it, and so insinuated himself into the affections of his neighbours, and got to be their prince. Those that exercise authority either are, or at least would be called, benefactors, Luk 22:25. 2. Others think that under pretence of hunting he gathered men under his command, in pursuit of another game he had to play, which was to make himself master of the country and to bring them into subjection. He was a mighty hunter, that is, he was a violent invader of his neighbours' rights and properties, and a persecutor of innocent men, carrying all before him, and endeavouring to make all his own by force and violence. He thought himself a mighty prince, but before the Lord (that is, in God's account) he was but a mighty hunter. Note, Great conquerors are but great hunters. Alexander and Caesar would not make such a figure in scripture-history as they do in common history; the former is represented in prophecy but as a he-goat pushing, Dan 8:5. Nimrod was a mighty hunter against the Lord, so the Septuagint; that is, (1.) He set up idolatry, as Jeroboam did, for the confirming of his usurped dominion. That he might set up a new government, he set up a new religion upon the ruin of the primitive constitution of both. Babel was the mother of harlots. Or, (2.) He carried on his oppression and violence in defiance of God himself, daring Heaven with his impieties, as if he and his huntsmen could out-brave the Almighty, and were a match for the Lord of hosts and all his armies. As if it were a small thing to weary men, he thinks to weary my God also, Isa 7:13.

II. Nimrod was a great ruler: The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Gen 10:10. Some way or other, by arts or arms, he got into power, either being chosen to it or forcing his way to it; and so laid the foundations of a monarchy, which was afterwards a head of gold, and the terror of the mighty, and bade fair to be universal. It does not appear that he had any right to rule by birth; but either his fitness for government recommended him, as some think, to an election, or by power and policy he advanced gradually, and perhaps insensibly, into the throne. See the antiquity of civil government, and particularly that form of it which lodges the sovereignty in a single person. If Nimrod and his neighbours began, other nations soon learned to incorporate under one head for their common safety and welfare, which, however it began, proved so great a blessing to the world that things were reckoned to go ill indeed when there was no king in Israel.

III. Nimrod was a great builder. Probably he was architect in the building of Babel, and there he began his kingdom; but, when his project to rule all the sons of Noah was baffled by the confusion of tongues, out of that land he went forth into Assyria (so the margin reads it, Gen 10:11) and built Nineveh, etc., that, having built these cities, he might command them and rule over them. Observe, in Nimrod, the nature of ambition. 1. It is boundless. Much would have more, and still cries, Give, give. 2. It is restless. Nimrod, when he had four cities under his command, could not be content till he had four more. 3. It is expensive. Nimrod will rather be at the charge of rearing cities than not have the honour of ruling them. The spirit of building is the common effect of a spirit of pride. 4. It is daring, and will stick at nothing. Nimrod's name signifies rebellion, which (if indeed he did abuse his power to the oppression of his neighbours) teaches us that tyrants to men are rebels to God, and their rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–14. Public domain.
Copy as
Philo of AlexandriaAD 50
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON GENESIS, II
(82) Why was Chus the father of Nimrod, who began to be a giant and a hunter before the Lord: on which account they said, "Like Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord?" (#Ge 10:8). The father in this case, having a nature truly dissolute, does not at all keep fast the spiritual bond of the soul, nor of nature, nor of consistency of manners, but rather like a giant born of the earth, prefers earthly to heavenly things, and thus appears to verify the ancient fable of the giants and Titans; for in truth he who is an emulator of earthly and corruptible things is always engaged in a conflict with heavenly and admirable natures, raising up earth as a bulwark against heaven; and those things which are below are adverse to those which are above. On which account there is much propriety in the expression, he was a giant against God, which thus declares the opposition of such beings to the deity; for a wicked man is nothing else than an enemy, contending against God: on which account it has become a proverb that every one who sins greatly ought to be referred to him as the original and chief of sinners, being spoken of "as a second Nimrod." Therefore his very name is an indication of his character, for it is interpreted Aethiopian, and his art is that of hunting, both of which things are detestable: an Aethiopian because unmitigated wickedness has no participation in light, but imitates night and darkness: and the practice of the huntsman is as much as possible at variance with rational nature, for he who lives among wild beasts wishes to live the life of a beast, and to be equal to the brutes in the vices of wickedness.
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
COMMENTARY ON GENESIS 8.1.2
Concerning Nimrod, Moses said, “He was a mighty hunter before the Lord,” because, according to the will of the Lord, it was he who fought with each of these nations and chased them out from there, so that they would go out and settle in the regions that had been set apart for them by God. “Therefore it is said, like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the Lord.” One used to bless a chief or a ruler by saying, “May you be like Nimrod, a mighty hunter who was victorious in the battles of the Lord.”
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON GENESIS 29.29
Then sacred Scripture goes on from this point to tell of the children born to the sons in these words: “Now, Ham became the father of Cush”; and further, “Now, Cush became the father of Nebrod (Nimrod), who began to be a giant on earth. He was a giant hunter before the Lord.” While some people say the phrase “before the Lord” means being in opposition to God, I on the contrary do not think sacred Scripture is implying this. Rather, it implies that [Nimrod] was strong and brave. But the phrase “before the Lord” means created by him, receiving from him God’s blessing. Or it may mean that God was on the point of arousing our wonder through him by creating such a remarkable creature and displaying him before us on the earth. Nimrod too, however, in his turn in imitation of his forebear did not take due advantage of his natural preeminence but hit upon another form of servitude in endeavoring to become ruler and king. You see, there would not ever be a king unless there were people being ruled. But in that case freedom is seen for what it really is, whereas slavery is the most galling obstacle to conditions of freedom, when all the more power is exercised over free people. See what ambition is guilty of. Observe bodily strength not keeping to its limits but constantly lusting after more and clutching for glory. You see, the orders [Nimrod] gave were not those of a leader. Rather, he even builds cities with a view to ruling over the enemy.
PrudentiusAD 410
ORIGIN OF SIN 143-48
A Nimrod, who goes round the world, made rough
With deep ravines and wooden crags, and strives
To waylay some by fraud and secret wiles,
To vanquish others by his giant arms
And spread his deadly triumphs far and wide.
JeromeAD 420
Hebrew Questions on Genesis
(Verse 8) And Cush begot Nimrod. He began to be powerful in the land. And after a little while:
JeromeAD 420
HEBREW QUESTIONS ON GENESIS 10.8-10
“And Chus [Cush] begat Nimrod. This man began to be powerful in the earth.” And after a little while, it says, “And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel and Arach and Achad and Chalanne in the land of Senaar [Shinar].” Nimrod, son of Chus, was the first to seize despotic rule over the people, which men were not yet accustomed to; and he reigned in Babylon, which was called Babel, because the languages of those building the tower were thrown into confusion there. For Babel signifies confusion. Then he also reigned in Arach, that is, in Edissa; and in Achad, which is now called Nisibis; and in Chalanne, which was later called Seleucia after king Seleucus when its name had been changed and which is now in actual fact called Ctesiphon.
BedeAD 735
Commentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron)
Moreover, Cush begat Nimrod. He began to be mighty on the earth, and he was a mighty hunter before the Lord. While the progeny of Shem and Japheth remained in the innocence of a simple life, a cursed offspring was born of the lineage of Ham, who would pervert the state of human interaction with a new way of living, being lifted up with unique power, living first by hunting; then, having gathered an army, he endeavored to exercise unusual tyranny over peoples; and finally, he is read to have had a kingdom and to have built great cities: which Scripture confirms because he was the first to do so, as it says: He began to be mighty. He began indeed because he was the first to do it. Moreover, he was mighty on the earth because, neglecting heavenly matters, in which the just are mighty, he learned to seek lowly things and place his hope in them.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 10:8 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.