Theodoret of Cyrus — Commentary on Scripture

Daniel 11:22

Here again he hinted at the empire of the Egyptians, that though they too were very powerful, destroying their adversaries like an inundation, and rendering them totally undone, they themselves would be subject to an inundation from him and would be crushed—and not they alone but “the prince of the covenant as well.”

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:22

Daniel 11:23

Here he foretells the revolt against Onias the high priest by Joshua, also called Jason, and by Onias, son of Menelaus. The former, Jason, had recourse to Antiochus and threw his own brother out from the high priesthood. Menelaus, who was commissioned to bring tributes and gold to Antiochus, appointed himself high priest and drove out Jason.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:23

Daniel 11:24

Although all his fathers and forefathers had honored the Jewish nation, he does everything to the contrary. He steals, plunders and enslaves—and bestows all these things on his troops. “And he shall make plans against Egypt, and yet only until a certain time.” That is to say, he will not rule for long.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:24

Daniel 11:25

The first book of the Maccabees relates this assault on Egypt: “Antiochus came to Egypt with a mighty host and with chariots, elephants, horses and a great expedition and battled against Ptolemy, king of Egypt. Ptolemy fled, and many of his soldiers were wounded and fell. Antiochus captured the fortresses of Egypt and plundered Egypt.”

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:25

Daniel 11:27

As the historian Josephus teaches us, the Romans learned about this army of his and commanded him to depart from Egypt. Then he made a peace treaty and shared a table with Ptolemy. The angel who addressed Daniel explained the festering wound underlying the friendship when he said, “Their hearts will turn to evil, and they will speak lies at the same table and will not set it right.” That is, the peace will not be secured: “Because the end will be at the appointed time.” That is, once this time has passed, they will engage again and march out in battle array.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:27

Daniel 11:28

But nonetheless he will then return to his own kingdom with much wealth and great abundance. “And his heart will be against the holy covenant.” At last, he will have one endeavor, namely, to destroy the law given by God to the Jews. Because he desires this, he puts his plans into effect. “And he will act and return to his land.” The book of the Maccabees and the history of Josephus explain this.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:28

Daniel 11:29

“And he will return at his appointed time,” that is, he will not conquer and prevail in the same manner as before, but he will return in defeat. The phrase “at his appointed time” indicates the time suitable for warfare.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:29

Daniel 11:30

“And those who arrive from Kittim will come to him, and they will be brought low.” He will ally himself with many Cypriots and other islanders (Kition to the present day is the main city of Cyprus); then he will set out against Egypt but return defeated and humiliated. “And he will return and become angry at the holy covenant.” He will spew forth against the holy covenant all his anger that came about because of his defeat. And he will show this anger in action, for he says, “and he will act.” At his second coming he will slaughter many, and he will make a treaty with those who had abandoned the holy covenant. He will accomplish every plan of the transgressors, that is, those who wish to deny that they are Jews and who wish instead to act as Greeks.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:30

Daniel 11:31

He calls the generals who assist him his “arms,” since after the manner of arms they fulfill the commands of the king. Therefore, he will send some to profane the sanctuary of the kingdom, that is, the temple dedicated to almighty God. He will erect an altar to an idol inside of it; he refers to it as the “desolating abomination.” The second book of the Maccabees teaches us this when it says, “And about this time Antiochus sent a second expedition to Egypt.” … Then he relates how the slaughter proceeded against all his comrades. The dead were numbered at eighty thousand. Shortly thereafter he says again, “Since Antiochus had a hostile disposition against the Jews, he sent the most loathsome Apollonius with an army of twenty thousand against two thousand and ordered them to slaughter everyone in every company they met.” And a little later he says again, “Soon thereafter the king sent an Athenian senator to compel the Jews to depart from their ancestral laws and not to conduct themselves any longer by the laws of God but to defile the temple in Jerusalem and to swear by Olympian Zeus.”

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:31

Daniel 11:32

He speaks enigmatically here about those around the blessed Mattathias, who was the first to oppose the decrees of Antiochus and to seek solitude with his sons; he took the field with few soldiers and prevailed against Antiochus’s generals.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:32

Daniel 11:33

Those who properly use the knowledge supplied by God will utterly despise that fellow’s laws and will prefer death for the divine law to a life of godlessness. To suggest as much, he went on, “they will fall to the sword” … the impious one employed all kinds of different punishments in an attempt to move the godly, inflicting them untimely death and as it were robbing them of the remainder of their life.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:33

Daniel 11:35

Many of those who seem to be godly will turn to the other direction. “So that they may be refined.” … These things will not harm the people of this time; they will learn not to have confidence in their previous successes.… For the vicissitudes in the situation will purify them as if by fire and test them and will separate the false from the tried and true.… These things take place partly in the present life, but in the time to come a complete testing of the people will occur. Once he said these things concerning Antiochus Epiphanes, he changes the remainder of the passage from the type to the archetype.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:35

Daniel 11:36

Antiochus will enjoy success, but not forever: “until his wrath has been spent,” that is, until he kindles and draws out God’s exceedingly great wrath. He calls the retribution God inflicts “his wrath,” for the divine nature has no passion.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:36

Daniel 11:37

But we find that Antiochus filled Jerusalem and all Judea with altars dedicated to idols and sacrificed to Zeus in the temple of God and called the temple in Jerusalem after Olympian Zeus and the temple on Mount Gerizim after Zeus Xenios. How, then, could it be said that this so superstitious man, this man so entranced by idols, “will not hearken to the gods of his fathers”? Antiochus spent all his time doing the opposite of the antichrist: he revered his fathers’ gods, while he rejected the God worshiped by the Jews. These prophecies do not fit Antiochus in the least, but rather the archetype of Antiochus, of whom Antiochus was a type and a foreshadowing, who will vie to outdo all the kings before him in his ungodliness.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:37

Daniel 11:38

Whereas all his ancestors acknowledged their natural limitations and did not presume to name themselves as god over all things, he gives himself the title God mighty and strong (the sense of Maozeim)—hence his putting “in his place,” meaning himself.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:38

Daniel 11:39

He says that he will raise temples for himself and adorn them with silver, gold and precious stones and subject many people to them; that is, he will subject the many people who have been deceived by his signs or who have been weakened by his punishments. But he will also “divide the land in exchange for gifts,” that is, he will bestow the largest portion of the land on those who have obediently chosen to be godless.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:39

Daniel 11:40

We have often said that the ten horns that appeared on the fourth beast represent ten kings who would reign at the same time at the end of the Roman Empire. From these kings the king of the south will wage war against this one, who is called the king of the north. “For from the north he will set ablaze all troubles against the inhabitants of the land.” Antiochus, who happened to be a type of the antichrist, also was called the king of the north. When the king of the south engages him in fight, he will march out against him with a multitude and with strong forces both on land and on sea and acquire the victory. The Lord in the holy Gospels foretold these wars: “Nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, plagues and earthquakes in various places. But all these things are the beginnings of the birth pangs.” Now that we have seen that the prediction of the Lord corresponds with this prophecy, we will be able to understand the verses before us.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:40

Daniel 11:41-43

These things do not fit at all with Antiochus. He never gained power over Libya or Ethiopia, or even Egypt itself. He was ordered by the Romans to leave, which he did. Therefore, the three horns that the little horn uprooted must refer to these three nations. The antichrist will destroy three great nations [Egypt, Ethiopia and Libya] governed by three kings, and he will subject them to himself.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:42-43

Daniel 11:44

This does not apply to Antiochus either. I mean that the disturbances did not drive him out of Egypt, but rather the decree of the Romans, which came from the west, not from the east. But as far as the antichrist is concerned, the prophecy says that once he takes Egypt, Libya and Ethiopia and subjugates them to himself, he will return, because he will be troubled by a certain rumor, and he will come in great anger “to curse and to obliterate many.” This is a hendiadys: “to obliterate” is to be stripped naked of godliness, and “to curse” is to declare that godliness is foreign to oneself.

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 11:44

Daniel 12:1

That is, those worthy of salvation, who obeyed the preaching of Elijah, the ones whom he foreknew from the first and the very beginning. He calls the knowledge of God “the book.”

COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 12:1