Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Thamah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The children H1121 of Barkos H1302, the children H1121 of Sisera H5516, the children H1121 of Thamah H8547,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
descendants of Barkos, descendants of Sisra, descendants of Temach,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
the descendants of Barkos, the descendants of Sisera, the descendants of Temah,
Ask
American Standard Version
the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Temah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Temah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Barcos, the sonnes of Sisara, the sonnes of Thamah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Barkos, sons of Sisera, sons of Thamah,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,081 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezra 2:53 is a concise yet profoundly significant verse embedded within the detailed census of Jewish exiles returning to Judah from Babylon. It specifically enumerates three family groups—the children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, and the children of Thamah—who are identified as belonging to the "children of Solomon's servants." This designation refers to a distinct class of temple functionaries whose ancestors had been conscripted by King Solomon for various royal and temple services. The verse underscores the meticulous record-keeping of the post-exilic community, highlighting the diverse composition of those who responded to God's call to return and rebuild Jerusalem, emphasizing that even individuals and families with non-Israelite origins or specialized hereditary roles were considered vital components of God's restorative plan for His covenant people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezra 2:53 is situated within the comprehensive register of the first wave of Jewish returnees from Babylonian exile, a list that spans from Ezra 2:1 to Ezra 2:70. This chapter serves as a foundational document, meticulously establishing the identity, lineage, and numbers of those who responded to King Cyrus's decree to rebuild the temple in Jerusalem. The list systematically categorizes individuals by their tribal affiliation, priestly lineage, Levitical service, and other specialized roles. Specifically, verses Ezra 2:55-58 enumerate the "children of Solomon's servants" and the "children of the Nethinim," two groups distinct from the main body of Israelites, priests, and Levites, yet crucial for the temple's functioning. Ezra 2:53, by naming Barkos, Sisera, and Thamah, provides specific examples of families belonging to this significant, though often overlooked, category of temple servants, demonstrating the meticulousness of the record. The parallel account in Nehemiah 7 further validates the importance and accuracy of these records, reinforcing their canonical significance.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The return from Babylonian exile, beginning in 538 BCE with King Cyrus's decree (recorded in Ezra 1:1-4), marked a pivotal moment in Israelite history, signifying God's faithfulness to His covenant promises after seventy years of punishment. The meticulous genealogical records in Ezra 2 were not merely administrative but culturally vital for the returning community. Lineage determined tribal inheritance, priestly qualifications, and social standing in a society deeply rooted in ancestral identity. The "children of Solomon's servants" were descendants of non-Israelite peoples (likely Canaanites, Hittites, and others) whom King Solomon had conscripted for arduous labor on his vast building projects, including the First Temple, as detailed in 1 Kings 9:20-21. Over centuries, these families became integrated into Israelite society, serving hereditary roles within the temple cult, distinct from the Levites but essential for its day-to-day operation. Their inclusion in the list of returnees underscores the community's desire for a complete restoration, embracing all who had historically served the Lord's house, regardless of their original ethnic background.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous listing in Ezra 2, including Ezra 2:53, contributes significantly to several overarching themes within the book of Ezra and the broader post-exilic narrative. Firstly, Identity and Restoration are paramount; the detailed genealogies establish who legitimately belonged to the covenant community returning to the land, ensuring proper lineage for priests, Levites, and tribal inheritances. This meticulous accounting reflects a deep concern for reconstituting Israel's identity after the disruption of exile, providing a foundation for the rebuilding of both temple and society. Secondly, the inclusion of "Solomon's servants" highlights the theme of Inclusivity within God's People. While not ethnically Israelite, these families had served the temple for generations, demonstrating that faithfulness and service, not just birthright, were pathways to belonging and recognition in the restored community. This subtly foreshadows a broader understanding of God's people, moving beyond strict ethnic boundaries. Thirdly, the sheer detail of the list, down to specific families like Barkos, Sisera, and Thamah, emphasizes Divine Providence and Meticulous Care. It suggests that God's plan for restoration encompassed every individual and family, no matter how seemingly minor, indicating His sovereign oversight even in the minutiae of His people's lives and the rebuilding of His sanctuary. This theme resonates with the idea that God knows and cares for each person, as seen in passages like Psalm 139:1-4.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • children (Hebrew, bên, H1121): This common Hebrew noun (H1121) means "son," but in its plural form "children" or "sons of" (as used here), it signifies descendants, members of a family, clan, or guild. As per the Strong's definition, it refers to a "builder of the family name" and encompasses a wide range of literal and figurative relationships, including offspring, members of a nation, or those associated with a particular quality or condition. In Ezra 2:53, its repetition before each name emphasizes the distinct family units being enumerated, highlighting their collective identity and lineage within the larger body of returnees.
  • Sisera (Hebrew, Çîyçᵉrâʼ, H5516): This proper noun (H5516) is of uncertain derivation but is notably associated with the Canaanite general Sisera, commander of Jabin's army, who was decisively defeated by Deborah and Barak in Judges 4. While it is highly unlikely that the family mentioned in Ezra 2:53 were direct biological descendants of that specific general, the recurrence of the name is intriguing. Given that these families are identified as "Solomon's servants," their non-Israelite origin is implied. The appearance of such a historically significant non-Israelite name among the temple servants suggests the long-standing integration of diverse peoples into the Israelite community, perhaps even descendants of those defeated by Israel, who subsequently adopted roles within the Israelite religious system over generations.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The children of Barkos,": This phrase introduces the first of three distinct family units listed in this verse. Barkos is a proper name, likely the progenitor or head of a family group that had served as "Solomon's servants." The inclusion of this specific family highlights the meticulous nature of the census, ensuring that even distinct sub-groups within the broader category of temple servants were accounted for in the return to Judah, underscoring the comprehensive scope of the restoration.
  • "the children of Sisera,": This clause names the second family group. As discussed in the Key Word Analysis, the name Sisera carries historical weight, potentially hinting at the diverse, non-Israelite origins of some of the "Solomon's servants." Its presence here underscores the long-standing integration of these families into the Israelite religious and social fabric, demonstrating their continued identity as a distinct, recognized group within the post-exilic community, essential for the functioning of the rebuilt temple.
  • "the children of Thamah,": The final clause of the verse identifies the third family. Thamah is another proper name, likely representing the ancestral head of this family. Like Barkos and Sisera, this family's inclusion affirms the comprehensive scope of the census and the importance placed on documenting every contributing lineage to the restored community, emphasizing that all who had served the Lord's house were valued and recognized in the new beginning, regardless of their original ethnic background.

Literary Devices

Ezra 2:53, like much of the surrounding chapter, primarily employs Listing and Genealogy/Census as its core literary techniques. The repetitive structure, "The children of Barkos, the children of Sisera, the children of Thamah," is a clear example of Anaphora, where the phrase "the children of" is repeated at the beginning of successive clauses. This creates a rhythmic and systematic enumeration that reinforces the meticulous nature of the record and the distinct identity of each family group. This repetition also functions as a form of Parallelism, linking these families together under a shared category ("Solomon's servants") while distinguishing them individually. The very act of such detailed listing, particularly in a sacred text, serves as powerful Symbolism of identity, belonging, and the re-establishment of order and community after the chaos of exile. It visually represents the painstaking process of rebuilding a nation, one family at a time, from diverse origins, all contributing to the larger tapestry of God's people and His redemptive plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezra 2:53, though a simple enumeration of names, profoundly illustrates God's meticulous care for His people and the diverse composition of His covenant community. The inclusion of the "children of Solomon's servants," a group historically distinct from the main Israelite tribes and likely of non-Israelite origin, underscores a theological principle of divine inclusivity. God's plan for restoration encompassed not only the descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob but also those who, through generations of faithful service to His temple, had become integral to the worshiping community. This meticulous record-keeping reflects God's sovereign oversight, demonstrating that every individual and family, regardless of their origin or perceived status, plays a vital role in His grand narrative of redemption. It speaks to the idea that God values every part of His body, ensuring that all who are called are accounted for in His kingdom and contribute to His purposes.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezra 2:53, a seemingly dry list of names, offers profound spiritual lessons for contemporary believers. It reminds us that every individual and family, no matter how obscure or seemingly insignificant their role, is known and valued by God within His grand redemptive plan. Just as the "children of Solomon's servants" were essential to the restoration of the physical temple and the community in ancient Judah, so too are diverse individuals with varied backgrounds and gifts indispensable to the building of God's spiritual house today—the Church. This verse challenges us to embrace and affirm the unique contributions of every member of the body of Christ, recognizing that God uses a wide array of people to accomplish His purposes. It encourages us to look beyond superficial distinctions of background, status, or perceived importance, and instead, to celebrate the unity in diversity that reflects the multifaceted wisdom of God. Our meticulous God cares about the details of our lives and our place in His story, inviting us to find our identity, purpose, and belonging within His family.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the inclusion of "Solomon's servants" in the list of returnees challenge our preconceptions about who "belongs" in God's community?
  • In what ways can we, as a church or community, better recognize and value the contributions of those whose roles might seem less prominent or whose backgrounds are different from our own?
  • What does God's meticulous attention to detail in these ancient lists tell us about His care for our individual lives today?

FAQ

Who were the "children of Solomon's servants" mentioned in Ezra 2:53?

Answer: The "children of Solomon's servants" (Hebrew: 'abde Shelomoh) were a distinct class of temple functionaries or royal servants whose ancestors were likely non-Israelite peoples (such as Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites) whom King Solomon had conscripted for forced labor on his building projects, including the Temple and royal palace, as recorded in 1 Kings 9:20-21. Over centuries, these families became hereditary servants of the temple, performing various duties that supported the priestly and Levitical ministries, such as preparing wood and water for sacrifices. Their inclusion in the list of returnees in Ezra 2, alongside priests, Levites, and other Israelites, signifies their long-standing integration into the Israelite community and their crucial role in the re-establishment of temple worship after the Babylonian exile. They were distinct from the Nethinim, another group of temple servants, though both groups often served similar functions.

Why are specific family names like Barkos, Sisera, and Thamah included in such a detailed list?

Answer: The inclusion of specific family names like Barkos, Sisera, and Thamah in Ezra 2:53, and indeed throughout Ezra chapter 2, serves several critical purposes for the post-exilic community. Firstly, it reflects the meticulous record-keeping, which was vital for re-establishing order, identity, and proper lineage after the disruption of exile. Genealogies and family lists determined land inheritance, priestly qualifications, and communal roles, ensuring a legitimate and organized return. Secondly, it underscores the comprehensive nature of the return; every group, no matter how small or specialized, was accounted for, emphasizing God's sovereign hand in gathering all His people for restoration. Thirdly, for groups like "Solomon's servants," these names provided a clear identity and legitimacy for their continued hereditary role in the temple service. The detailed listing ensures that all who returned were recognized as part of the restored covenant community, highlighting God's care for every individual and family involved in His redemptive plan for His people. The parallel list in Nehemiah 7 further emphasizes the importance and accuracy placed on these records by the biblical authors.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezra 2:53, with its meticulous listing of families like the children of Barkos, Sisera, and Thamah, particularly those identified as "Solomon's servants" with non-Israelite origins, beautifully foreshadows the expansive and inclusive nature of God's new covenant in Christ. The Old Testament emphasis on physical lineage and the careful inclusion of even "outsiders" who served the temple points to a greater reality: that in Christ, the barriers of ethnic origin and social status are utterly dissolved. Just as these families were integrated into the Old Covenant community through generations of dedicated service, so too does the New Covenant invite all peoples—Jew and Gentile alike—into God's spiritual family through faith in Jesus. The meticulous accounting of returnees in Ezra prefigures the divine knowledge and calling of every individual into the body of Christ, the Church, where there is "neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28). The ultimate "Servant of the Lord," Jesus Christ, through His perfect sacrifice, established a new temple not made with human hands, where all who believe are living stones, built into a spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5) and called to serve. Thus, the detailed inclusion of these ancient temple servants in Ezra finds its glorious fulfillment in the diverse, global community of believers united under Christ, the true King and ultimate Temple, who welcomes all who come to Him.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezra 2 verses 36–63

Here is an account, I. Of the priests that returned, and they were a considerable number, about a tenth part of the whole company: for the whole were above 42,000 (Ezr 2:64), and four families of priests made up above 4200 (Ezr 2:36-39); thus was the tenth God's part - a blessed decimation. Three of the fathers of the priests here named were heads of courses, Ch1 24:7, Ch1 24:8, Ch1 24:14. The fourth was Pashur, v. 38. If these were of the posterity of that Pashur that abused Jeremiah (Jer 20:1), it is strange that so bad a man should have so good a seed, and so numerous.

II. Of the Levites. I cannot but wonder at the small number of them, for, taking in both the singers and the porters (Ezr 2:40-42), they did not make 350. Time was when the Levites were more forward to their duty than the priests (Ch2 29:34), but they were not so now. If one place, one family, has the reputation for pious zeal now, another may have it another time. The wind blows where it listeth, and shifts its points.

III. Of the Nethinim, who, it is supposed, were the Gibeonites, given (so their name signifies) by Joshua first (Jos 9:27), and again by David (Ezr 8:20), when Saul had expelled them, to be employed by the Levites in the work of God's house as hewers of wood and drawers of water; and, with them, of the children of Solomon's servants, whom he gave for the like use (whether they were Jews or Gentiles does not appear) and who were here taken notice of among the retainers of the temple and numbered with the Nethinim, Ezr 2:55, Ezr 2:58. Note, It is an honour to belong to God's house, though in the meanest office there.

IV. Of some that were looked upon as Israelites by birth, and others as priests, and yet could not make out a clear title to the honour. 1. There were some that could not prove themselves Israelites (Ezr 2:59, Ezr 2:60), a considerable number, who presumed they were of the seed of Jacob, but could not produce their pedigrees, and yet would go up to Jerusalem, having an affection to the house and people of God. These shamed those who were true-born Israelites, and yet were not called Israelites indeed, who came out of the waters of Judah (Isa 48:1), but had lost the relish of those waters. 2. There were others that could not prove themselves priests, and yet were supposed to be of the seed of Aaron. What is not preserved in black and white will, in all likelihood, be forgotten in a little time. Now we are here told, (1.) How they lost their evidence. One of their ancestors married a daughter of Barzillai, that great man whom we read of in David's time; he gloried in an alliance to that honourable family, and, preferring that before the dignity of his priesthood, would have his children called after Barzillai's family, and their pedigree preserved in the registers of that house, not of the house of Aaron, and so they lost it. In Babylon there was nothing to be got by the priesthood, and therefore they cared not for being akin to it. Those who think their ministry, or their relation to ministers, a diminution or disparagement to them, forget who it was that said, I magnify my office. (2.) What they lost with it. It could not be taken for granted that they were priests when they could not produce their proofs, but they were, as polluted, put from the priesthood. Now that the priests had recovered their rights, and had the altar to live upon again, they would gladly be looked upon as priests. But they had sold their birthright for the honour of being gentlemen, and therefore were justly degraded, and forbidden to eat of the most holy things. Note, Christ will be ashamed of those that are ashamed of him and his service. It was the tirshatha, or governor, that put them under this sequestration, which some understand of Zerubbabel the present governor, others of Nehemiah (who is so called, Neh 8:9, Neh 10:1, and who gave this order when he came some years after); but the prohibition was not absolute, it was only a suspension, till there should be a high priest with Urim and Thummin, by whom they might know God's mind in this matter. This, it seems, was expected and desired, but it does not appear that ever they were blessed with it under the second temple. They had the canon of the Old Testament complete, which was better than Urim; and, by the want of that oracle, they were taught to expect the Messiah the great Oracle, which the Urim and Thummim was but a type of. Nor does it appear that the second temple had the ark in it, either the old one or a new one. Those shadows by degrees vanished, as the substance approached; and God, by the prophet, intimates to his people that they should sustain no damage by the want of the ark, Jer 3:16, Jer 3:17. In those days, when they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord, and all the nations shall be gathered to it, they shall say no more, The ark of the covenant of the Lord, neither shall it come to mind, for they shall do very well without it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 36–63. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 2:53 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.