Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
The children of Bigvai, two thousand fifty and six.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
The children H1121 of Bigvai H902, two thousand H505 fifty H2572 and six H8337.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
descendants of Bigvai 2,056
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
the descendants of Bigvai, 2,056;
Ask
American Standard Version
The children of Bigvai, two thousand fifty and six.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The children of Bigvai, two thousand fifty-six.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
The sonnes of Biguai, two thousand, and sixe and fiftie:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Sons of Bigvai, two thousand fifty and six.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 12,042 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezra 2:14 is a precise entry within a comprehensive register of families and individuals who returned to Judah from Babylonian exile, specifically detailing that two thousand fifty-six descendants of Bigvai participated in this pivotal restoration. Though seemingly a simple numerical record, this verse contributes significantly to the overarching narrative of God's meticulous faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises, re-establishing His people, and laying the groundwork for the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the Temple. It underscores the importance of lineage, identity, and community in God's redemptive plan for His chosen nation, highlighting the tangible reality of divine restoration.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Ezra 2:14 is situated within a lengthy and detailed census that spans the entirety of Ezra chapter 2. This chapter meticulously lists the various families and their respective numbers who returned to Jerusalem and Judah under the decree of King Cyrus. The preceding verses (Ezra 2:1-13) introduce the general context of the return and begin the enumeration of the prominent families. The list continues after verse 14, culminating in a summary of the total number of returnees (Ezra 2:64-67). This precise record-keeping serves as a foundational document, establishing the identity and legitimacy of the returning community as the true inheritors of the land and the covenant promises, preparing them for the monumental task of rebuilding the Temple and the city. The inclusion of specific family names and numbers, like that of Bigvai, validates the historical account and emphasizes the corporate nature of God's people.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The return documented in Ezra 2 occurred after seventy years of Babylonian captivity, a period of exile prophesied by Jeremiah (Jeremiah 29:10). In 538 BC, King Cyrus the Great of Persia issued a decree (recorded in Ezra 1:1-4) allowing the exiled Jews to return to their homeland and rebuild their Temple. For a people whose identity was deeply intertwined with their tribal and family lineage, a meticulous census was not merely administrative; it was crucial for re-establishing land claims, confirming priestly and Levitical descent, and ensuring the purity of the community. The careful enumeration of families like Bigvai's highlights the cultural significance of genealogy in ancient Israel, serving as a vital link to their heritage, their covenant with God, and their future in the land. This detailed record-keeping provided a legitimate basis for the re-establishment of the Israelite nation in Judah.

  • Key Themes: The meticulous listing of returnees in Ezra 2, including the children of Bigvai, contributes to several profound themes. Firstly, it powerfully illustrates Divine Faithfulness and Restoration. Despite Israel's disobedience leading to exile, God remained true to His covenant, orchestrating their return as promised. This census is a tangible manifestation of God's commitment to His people, fulfilling His word. Secondly, the detailed record-keeping underscores Order and Accountability within God's redemptive plan. Every individual and family was accounted for, emphasizing that each played a vital role in the collective effort of rebuilding the nation and the Temple, reflecting God's sovereign and orderly hand. Lastly, this census reinforces the theme of Identity and Community. For a scattered people, knowing one's family and tribal affiliation was paramount for re-establishing their national and religious identity, fostering unity, and rebuilding a cohesive community dedicated to the worship of Yahweh and the re-establishment of the Mosaic Law in Judah (Nehemiah 8:1-8). The very act of being listed validated their belonging and purpose in God's continuing narrative.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • children (Hebrew, bên', H1121): Derived from a root meaning "to build," this term signifies more than just biological offspring; it refers to a son as a "builder of the family name" or a member of a lineage. In this context, "the children of Bigvai" denotes the corporate body of descendants or members associated with the patriarch Bigvai, emphasizing the continuity of family lines and the preservation of distinct social units crucial for the re-establishment of Israelite society after the exile.
  • Bigvai (Hebrew, Bigvay', H902): This is a personal name, likely of foreign origin, identifying the head or progenitor of a specific family unit. Its inclusion in this detailed census highlights the importance of individual family identities within the broader community of returning exiles. The name serves as a marker of a distinct clan that contributed a significant number of individuals to the post-exilic restoration, underscoring the meticulous nature of the record and the structured re-gathering of God's people.
  • two thousand fifty and six (Hebrew, ʼeleph "thousand," chămishshîym "fifty," shêsh "six", H505): This precise numerical count is a central feature of the verse. While seemingly a simple statistic, the exact figure underscores the meticulous nature of the census. It signifies not just a general return but a divinely organized and humanly recorded re-gathering of specific individuals and families. The detailed numerical accuracy emphasizes the tangible reality of the restoration and the value God places on each person and group within His covenant community, demonstrating His sovereign oversight even in the minute details of their return and resettlement.

Verse Breakdown

  • "The children of Bigvai": This phrase identifies a specific family unit, indicating that the count refers to the descendants or members associated with the patriarch Bigvai. In ancient Israel, identity was often corporate, rooted in family and clan. The "children of Bigvai" represent a distinct, recognized group within the larger body of returning exiles, highlighting the preservation of family lines and the structured nature of the return. This emphasis on family units was crucial for re-establishing social order, land ownership, and communal responsibilities in the nascent post-exilic society.
  • "two thousand fifty and six": This precise number provides the exact count of individuals belonging to the family of Bigvai. The specificity of the number underscores the administrative rigor and historical accuracy intended by the chronicler. It signifies a substantial contribution to the overall number of returnees, indicating the significant size and influence of this particular family. This numerical detail, when viewed alongside the other family counts in Ezra 2, paints a comprehensive picture of the scale of God's redemptive work in gathering His dispersed people back to their homeland.

Literary Devices

Ezra 2:14, as part of a larger list, primarily employs Enumeration and Census as key literary devices. The meticulous enumeration of individuals by family unit serves to establish a clear and verifiable record of the returning exiles, lending historical credibility and administrative weight to the narrative. This detailed listing functions as a census, which in biblical literature often signifies divine ordering, covenant fulfillment, and the establishment of a new phase in God's redemptive history. By providing specific numbers for each family, the text emphasizes the tangible reality of the restoration and the re-constitution of the community. The repetition of this pattern (family name + number) throughout Ezra 2 creates a sense of comprehensive coverage and divine oversight, reinforcing the idea that every returning individual was part of God's grand plan. While seemingly dry, this precise numerical accounting also carries a symbolic weight, representing the fulfillment of God's promise to gather His scattered people and rebuild His nation, demonstrating His faithfulness even in the smallest details.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezra 2:14, though a simple numerical entry, speaks volumes about God's character and His ongoing work in history. It underscores God's meticulous care for His people, demonstrating that His covenant promises are not vague but are fulfilled with precise attention to detail, even down to the individual family units. This verse is a testament to God's faithfulness in remembering His scattered flock and orchestrating their return, fulfilling prophecies of restoration. It highlights the divine order in the process of rebuilding, where every family, regardless of size, plays a vital role in the corporate body. The return of the exiles, meticulously documented, serves as a powerful reminder that God is sovereign over nations and history, working through human decrees and individual choices to accomplish His redemptive purposes. This detailed record emphasizes that God's redemptive plan is both grand in scope and precise in execution, leaving no detail to chance.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly dry statistics of Ezra 2:14 offer a profound spiritual lesson: God's faithfulness extends to the minutiae of our lives and His grand plan. Just as He meticulously accounted for every family and individual returning from exile, He knows and cares for each one of us, valuing our unique place in His story. This verse reminds us that even when we feel like a mere number in a vast world, we are known and cherished by God. It encourages us to recognize that our individual contributions, no matter how small they seem, are significant in the collective work of God's kingdom. The rebuilding of the Temple and the community in Ezra's time required the participation of every family, emphasizing the power of unity and collective action in spiritual endeavors. We are called to contribute our unique gifts and presence to the body of Christ, working together to build up His church and advance His purposes in the world, trusting that God sees and values every detail of our obedience and service. This passage, therefore, calls us to embrace our identity within God's family and to faithfully participate in the ongoing work of His kingdom, knowing that our efforts, however humble, are seen and counted by Him.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's meticulous attention to detail in the census of Ezra 2:14 encourage you in your personal walk with Him?
  • In what ways can you see the importance of "community" and "collective action" in your own spiritual journey or in your local church?
  • How does understanding God's faithfulness in restoring His people from exile strengthen your trust in His ability to restore areas of your own life?

FAQ

Why are there slight numerical discrepancies between Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7 for families like Bigvai?

Answer: The slight numerical discrepancies (e.g., Bigvai's descendants are 2,056 in Ezra 2:14 and 2,067 in Nehemiah 7:19) are common in ancient manuscripts and do not undermine the overall historical accuracy or divine inspiration of the texts. Scholars propose several explanations:

  1. Different Censuses: The lists might represent slightly different points in time or different stages of the return, with some individuals joining or leaving the group.
  2. Scribal Variations: Copying ancient texts by hand inevitably led to minor numerical variations, especially with large numbers. Such variations are common across ancient literature and do not impact the core theological message.
  3. Inclusion Criteria: The criteria for inclusion in each list might have differed slightly (e.g., including only heads of households versus all individuals, or those who actually settled versus those who initially registered).
    Regardless of the precise reason, the consistency in the family names and the overall magnitude of the return across both lists strongly affirms the historical event of the post-exilic restoration, demonstrating God's faithfulness in gathering His people.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezra 2:14, with its focus on the meticulous gathering and enumeration of God's people for restoration, powerfully foreshadows the ultimate and perfect gathering accomplished in Jesus Christ. Just as the physical return from Babylon was a testament to God's covenant faithfulness, Christ's coming marks the definitive fulfillment of all God's promises to His people. He is the true Shepherd who gathers the scattered sheep of Israel and, indeed, all nations into His fold (John 10:16). The specific numbers in Ezra speak to God's precise knowledge of His people; similarly, Jesus declares that He knows His sheep by name (John 10:3) and that not one of them will be lost (John 6:39). The rebuilding of the physical Temple in Ezra's day points to Christ as the ultimate Temple, the dwelling place of God among humanity (John 2:19-21). Furthermore, the "children of Bigvai" and other families represent the corporate body of Israel being re-established; this finds its ultimate fulfillment in the Church, the new Israel, a spiritual house built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus Himself as the cornerstone (Ephesians 2:19-22). Thus, the meticulous historical record in Ezra anticipates the comprehensive and redemptive work of Christ, who gathers, restores, and builds His eternal kingdom with every one of His redeemed.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezra 2 verses 1–35

We may observe here, 1. That an account was kept in writing of the families that came up out of captivity, and the numbers of each family. This was done for their honour, as part of their recompence for their faith and courage, their confidence in God and their affection to their own land, and to stir up others to follow their good example. Those that honour God he will thus honour. The names of all those Israelites indeed that accept the offer of deliverance by Christ shall be found, to their honour, in a more sacred record than this, even in the Lamb's book of life. The account that was kept of the families that came up from the captivity was intended also for the benefit of posterity, that they might know from whom they descended and to whom they were allied. 2. That they are called children of the province. Judah, which had been an illustrious kingdom, to which other kingdoms had been made provinces, subject to it and dependent on it, was now itself made a province, to receive laws and commissions from the king of Persia and to be accountable to him. See how sin diminishes and debases a nation, which righteousness would exalt. But by thus being made servants (as the patriarchs by being sojourners in a country which was theirs by promise) they were reminded of the better country, that is, the heavenly (Heb 11:16), a kingdom which cannot be moved, or changed into a province. 3. That they are said to come every one to his city, that is, the city appointed them, in which appointment an eye, no doubt, was had to their former settlement by Joshua; and to that, as near as might be, they returned: for it does not appear that any others, at least any that were able to oppose them, had possessed them in their absence. 4. That the leaders are first mentioned, v. 2. Zerubbabel and Jeshua were their Moses and Aaron, the former their chief prince, the latter their chief priest. Nehemiah and Mordecai are mentioned here; some think not the same with the famous men we afterwards meet with of those names: probably they were the same, but afterwards returned to court for the service of their country. 5. Some of these several families are named from the persons that were their ancestors, others from the places in which they had formerly resided; as with us many surnames are the proper names of persons, others of places. 6. Some little difference there is between the numbers of some of the families here and in Neh. 7, where this catalogue is repeated, which might arise from this, that some who had given in their names at first to come afterwards drew back - said, I go, Sir, but went not, which would lessen the number of the families they belonged to; others that declined, at first, afterwards repented and went, and so increased the number. 7. Here are two families that are called the children of Elam (one Ezr 2:7, another Ezr 2:31), and, which is strange, the number of both is the same, 1254. 8. The children of Adonikam, which signifies a high lord, were 666, just the number of the beast (Rev 13:18), which is there said to be the number of a man, which, Mr. Hugh Broughton thinks, has reference to this man. 9. The children of Bethlehem (Ezr 2:21) were but 123, though it was David's city; for Bethlehem was little among the thousands of Judah, yet there must the Messiah arise, Mic 5:2. 10. Anathoth had been a famous place in the tribe of Benjamin and yet here it numbered but 128 (v. 23), which is to be imputed to the divine curse which the men of Anathoth brought upon themselves by persecuting Jeremiah, who was of their city. Jer 11:21, Jer 11:23, There shall be no remnant of them, for I will bring evil upon the men of Anathoth. And see Isa 10:30, O poor Anathoth! Nothing brings ruin on a people sooner than persecution.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–35. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezra 2:14 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.