Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of the children of Ammon, and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have ripped up the women with child of Gilead, that they might enlarge their border:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Thus saith H559 the LORD H3068; For three H7969 transgressions H6588 of the children H1121 of Ammon H5983, and for four H702, I will not turn away H7725 the punishment thereof; because they have ripped up H1234 the women with child H2030 of Gilead H1568, that they might enlarge H7337 their border H1366:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Here is what ADONAI says: "For the people of 'Amon's three crimes, no, four - I will not reverse it - because they ripped apart pregnant women just to expand their territory,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
This is what the LORD says: “For three transgressions of the Ammonites, even four, I will not revoke My judgment, because they ripped open the pregnant women of Gilead in order to enlarge their territory.
Ask
American Standard Version
Thus saith Jehovah: For three transgressions of the children of Ammon, yea, for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have ripped up the women with child of Gilead, that they may enlarge their border.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Thus says the LORD: “For three transgressions of the children of Ammon, yes, for four, I will not turn away its punishment; because they have ripped open the pregnant women of Gilead, that they may enlarge their border.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Thus sayth ye Lord, For three transgressions of the children of Ammon, and for foure, I will not turne to it, because they haue ript vp the women with child of Gilead, that they might enlarge their border.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Thus said Jehovah: For three transgressions of the sons of Ammon, And for four, I do not reverse it, Because of their ripping up the pregnant ones of Gilead, To enlarge their border,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 22,378 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Amos 1:13 declares the LORD's unyielding judgment against the Ammonites for their horrific atrocities against the inhabitants of Gilead. Their specific transgression—ripping open pregnant women—was an act of extreme cruelty and depopulation, motivated by a ruthless desire to expand their territory. This divine oracle underscores God's universal sovereignty and unwavering commitment to justice, holding all nations accountable for their moral transgressions, especially those involving the brutalization of the vulnerable.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Amos 1:13 is part of a series of oracles (Amos 1:3-2:16) delivered by the prophet Amos against the nations surrounding Israel and Judah, including Damascus, Gaza, Tyre, Edom, Ammon, Moab, and finally, Judah and Israel themselves. This structured progression, moving from the outer nations inward, serves a crucial rhetorical purpose: it establishes God's universal authority and moral standard over all peoples before turning the spotlight on the covenant nations. The "three transgressions... and for four" formula, repeated for each nation, signifies a full measure of iniquity, indicating that God's patience has been exhausted and judgment is inevitable. The specific, heinous nature of each nation's sin is highlighted, demonstrating that God's judgment is not arbitrary but a righteous response to specific acts of injustice and cruelty.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Amos prophesied during a period of relative peace and economic prosperity in both the Northern Kingdom of Israel (under Jeroboam II) and the Southern Kingdom of Judah (under Uzziah), around the mid-8th century BCE. Despite this prosperity, spiritual and moral decline was rampant. The Ammonites were a Semitic people, descendants of Lot (Genesis 19:38), who inhabited the Transjordanian region, east of the Jordan River. Their territory bordered Gilead, a fertile region historically settled by the Israelite tribes of Gad and Reuben. Throughout their history, the Ammonites and Israelites were frequently in conflict, often over territorial claims to Gilead (e.g., Judges 11). The act of "ripping up the women with child" was not merely a casualty of war but a deliberate, brutal tactic of ethnic cleansing and terror, designed to eliminate future generations and seize land without resistance. Such atrocities were not uncommon in ancient Near Eastern warfare, but they were unequivocally condemned by God.
  • Key Themes: Amos 1:13 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in the book of Amos. Firstly, it emphasizes God's Universal Sovereignty and Justice, demonstrating that the LORD's moral law and authority extend far beyond Israel to encompass all nations, holding them accountable for their actions (e.g., Amos 9:7). Secondly, the phrase "For three transgressions... and for four" highlights the theme of Divine Patience Exhausted and Inevitable Judgment, indicating that the Ammonites' cumulative sins had reached a point of no return. Thirdly, the graphic description of their crime underscores the theme of Extreme Cruelty and Inhumanity, revealing the depths of depravity to which nations can sink when driven by unchecked ambition. Finally, the motivation "that they might enlarge their border" points to the pervasive theme of Greed and Territorial Expansionism as a root cause of horrific violence and injustice in the ancient world, and indeed, in all ages.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • ripped up (Hebrew, bâqaʻ', H1234): Meaning "to cleave; generally, to rend, break, rip or open." This word vividly portrays the violent and destructive nature of the Ammonite act. It implies a deliberate and brutal tearing apart, emphasizing the extreme cruelty inflicted upon the most vulnerable.
  • women with child (Hebrew, hâreh', H2030): Meaning "pregnant." This term specifically identifies the victims, highlighting their defenseless state and the particularly heinous nature of the crime. The targeting of pregnant women underscores a deliberate attempt to eradicate the future generations of Gilead, not merely to defeat an army.
  • enlarge (Hebrew, râchab', H7337): Meaning "to broaden (intransitive or transitive, literal or figurative); to make large, make room, make (open) wide." This word reveals the Ammonites' primary motivation: an insatiable desire for more land and power. Their violence was a means to achieve territorial expansion, driven by covetousness.
  • border (Hebrew, gᵉbûwl', H1366): Meaning "properly, a cord (as twisted), i.e. (by implication) a boundary; by extension the territory inclosed." This term specifies the object of the Ammonites' expansionist ambitions. They sought to push the limits of their existing territory, demonstrating a disregard for established boundaries and the rights of their neighbors.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Thus saith the LORD; For three transgressions of the children of Ammon, and for four, I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof;": This opening declaration establishes the divine authority behind the pronouncement. "Thus saith the LORD" (Yahweh) signifies an unalterable decree from the sovereign God. The numerical formula "For three transgressions... and for four" is a rhetorical device indicating a completed series of offenses, a full measure of iniquity that has exhausted God's patience. It does not mean precisely seven sins but rather that the Ammonites' wickedness has reached its climax, making divine judgment inevitable and irreversible. The phrase "I will not turn away [the punishment] thereof" emphasizes the certainty and finality of the impending judgment.
  • "because they have ripped up the women with child of Gilead,": This clause specifies the egregious crime that warrants such severe judgment. The act of "ripping up" (KJV) or "slitting open" (more modern translations) pregnant women is an act of unspeakable barbarity. It signifies not just murder, but the deliberate destruction of life in its most vulnerable state, including the unborn. The victims are identified as inhabitants of Gilead, a region often contested between Ammon and Israel, highlighting the specific target of their cruelty.
  • "that they might enlarge their border:": This final clause reveals the chilling motivation behind the atrocity. The Ammonites committed this horrific act not out of military necessity or self-defense, but solely "that they might enlarge their border." This exposes their actions as driven by covetousness, territorial ambition, and a ruthless disregard for human life in pursuit of material gain. It underscores how unchecked greed can lead to the most monstrous acts of violence.

Literary Devices

Amos 1:13 employs several powerful Literary Devices to convey its message of divine judgment. The most prominent is the Numerical Progression "For three transgressions... and for four," a common literary trope in Hebrew wisdom literature (e.g., Proverbs 30:15). This device serves as a rhetorical crescendo, building suspense and emphasizing the cumulative nature of the nation's guilt, culminating in a final, decisive transgression that seals their fate. The language used to describe the act of "ripping up the women with child" employs Graphic Imagery, designed to evoke shock and horror, underscoring the extreme brutality and inhumanity of the Ammonites' actions. This vivid description highlights the depth of their depravity and justifies the severity of God's impending judgment. Furthermore, the opening phrase, "Thus saith the LORD," functions as a Divine Oracle Formula, lending absolute authority and certainty to the prophetic pronouncement, emphasizing that this judgment originates from the sovereign God of all nations.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Amos 1:13 serves as a stark reminder of God's absolute justice and His moral governance over all nations, not just Israel. It reveals that the LORD's standards of righteousness are universal, condemning acts of extreme cruelty, violence, and oppression, especially when directed at the most vulnerable. The Ammonites' crime against pregnant women in Gilead, driven by territorial greed, highlights the sanctity of human life, even in the womb, and the severe consequences of allowing covetousness to override basic human compassion and moral law. This passage fundamentally challenges any notion that God is indifferent to the suffering of humanity or that nations can act with impunity outside of His divine oversight. It underscores that God is a righteous judge who will hold all accountable for their actions.

  • Proverbs 30:15 - Illustrates the use of the numerical pattern "three... and four" in Hebrew wisdom literature to emphasize a point or series.
  • Isaiah 13:1 - An example of a prophetic "burden" or oracle against a foreign nation, demonstrating God's judgment extending beyond Israel.
  • Psalm 9:7-8 - Affirms God's eternal reign and His role as the righteous judge of the world.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Amos 1:13 confronts us with the sobering reality of divine justice and the profound value God places on human life. It compels us to recognize that God is not a distant deity but an active, moral governor who sees and will judge acts of cruelty and oppression, regardless of who commits them or the perceived justification. This passage challenges us to examine our own hearts for any seeds of greed, ambition, or dehumanization that could lead to harm against others, particularly the vulnerable. It serves as a powerful call to advocate for justice, to protect the sanctity of life from conception, and to stand against all forms of violence and oppression in our world. In a world still plagued by conflicts driven by territorial disputes and the brutalization of innocent civilians, Amos's ancient oracle remains profoundly relevant, urging believers to pray for righteousness to prevail and to actively participate in bringing God's kingdom values of justice, mercy, and peace to bear on society.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Amos 1:13 challenge our understanding of God's justice in a world where atrocities still occur?
  • What does the specific nature of the Ammonites' crime (ripping up pregnant women) reveal about the sanctity of life from God's perspective?
  • In what ways might the desire to "enlarge their border" (territorial gain, power, wealth) manifest in modern injustices, and how can we resist such motivations?
  • How can believers effectively stand against injustice and advocate for the vulnerable in light of this passage?

FAQ

What is the significance of the phrase "For three transgressions... and for four"?

Answer: This is a common Hebrew numerical literary device, often called a "numerical proverb" or "ascending numerical pattern." It doesn't mean exactly seven sins. Instead, it signifies a cumulative series of offenses, where the "four" represents the final, overflowing measure of iniquity that pushes God's patience to its limit, making judgment inevitable. It emphasizes that the Ammonites had committed numerous grave sins, culminating in the specific atrocity mentioned, which was the final straw. This pattern is used throughout Amos 1-2 for each nation judged.

Why was the act of "ripping up the women with child" considered so heinous?

Answer: This act was considered particularly heinous for several reasons. Firstly, it was an extreme form of brutality and a direct assault on the most vulnerable members of society—defenseless pregnant women and their unborn children. It was not merely an act of war against combatants but a deliberate act of terror and ethnic cleansing, aimed at eradicating future generations of the Gileadites. Such an act violated fundamental human dignity and the sanctity of life, demonstrating a complete lack of compassion and an utter disregard for God's moral law. It was an atrocity designed to depopulate the land and seize territory without future resistance.

Who were the Ammonites and Gileadites, and what was their relationship?

Answer: The Ammonites were descendants of Lot, Abraham's nephew, and inhabited a region east of the Jordan River. Their territory bordered Gilead, a fertile land west of them, which was settled by the Israelite tribes of Gad and Reuben. Historically, there was significant tension and conflict between the Ammonites and the Israelites over control of Gilead. The Ammonites frequently sought to expand their territory into Gilead, leading to numerous clashes, as seen in passages like Judges 11. This historical context underscores the territorial ambition that drove the Ammonites' brutal actions described in Amos 1:13.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Amos 1:13, with its vivid depiction of God's righteous wrath against injustice and extreme cruelty, finds its ultimate fulfillment and illumination in the person and work of Jesus Christ. While the verse speaks of God's judgment on a specific nation for its heinous acts, Christ embodies the perfect justice and mercy of God. He is the one who upholds the sanctity of all human life, from conception, and who will ultimately judge all nations not merely for their outward acts but for the very intentions of their hearts (Matthew 25:31-46). The Ammonites' desire to "enlarge their border" through violence stands in stark contrast to Christ's kingdom, which expands not through conquest and brutality but through self-sacrificial love and the peaceful transformation of hearts (John 18:36). Jesus, as the Lamb of God, suffered the ultimate injustice to bring about reconciliation and redemption, offering a path for humanity to escape the judgment due to sin and enter into a new, righteous "border" within His eternal kingdom (Romans 3:23-26). Ultimately, Christ's return will bring the final and complete eradication of all injustice, cruelty, and territorial ambition, establishing a new heavens and new earth where righteousness dwells (Revelation 21:1-4).

Copy as

Commentary on Amos 1 verses 3–15

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

What the Lord says here may be explained by what he says Jer 12:14, Thus said the Lord, against all my evil neighbours that touch the inheritance of my people Israel, Behold, I will pluck them out. Damascus was a near neighbour to Israel on the north, Tyre and Gaza on the west, Edom on the south, Ammon and (in the next chapter) Moab on the east; and all of them had been, one time, one way, or other, pricking briers and grieving thorns to Israel, evil neighbours to them; and, because God espouses his people's cause, he there calls them his evil neighbours, and here comes forth to reckon with them. The method is taken in dealing with each of them is, in part, the same, and therefore we put them together, and yet in each there is something peculiar.

I. Let us see what is repeated, both by way of charge and by way of sentence, concerning them all. The controversy God has with each of them is prefaced with, Thus said the Lord, Jehovah the God of Israel. Though those nations will not worship him as their God, yet they shall be made to know that they are accountable to him as their Judge. The God of Israel is the God of the whole earth, and has something to say to them that shall make them tremble. Against them the Lord roars out of Zion. And before God, by the prophet, threatens Israel and Judah, he denounces judgments against those nations whom he made use of as scourges to them for their being so, which might serve for a check to their pride and insolence and a relief to his people under their dejections; for hereby they might see that God had not quitted his interest in them, and therefore might hope they had not lost their interest in him. Now as to all these nations here arraigned,

1.The indictment drawn up against them all is thus far the same, (1.) That they are charged in general with three transgressions, and with four, that is, with many transgressions (as by one or two we mean a few, so by three or four we mean many, as in Latin a man that is very happy is said to be terque quarterque beatus - three and four times happy); or with three and four, that is, with seven transgressions, a number of perfection, intimating that they have filled up the measure of their iniquities, and are ripe for ruin; or with three (that is, a variety of sins) and with a fourth especially, which is specified concerning each of them, though the other three are not, as Pro 30:15, Pro 30:18, Pro 30:21, Pro 30:29, where we read of three things, yea, four, generally one seems to be more especially intended. (2.) That the particular sin which is fastened upon as the fourth, and which alone is specified, is the sin of persecution: it is some mischief or other done to the people of God that is particularly charged upon every one of them, for persecution is the measure-filling sin of any people, and it is this sin that will be particularly reckoned for - I was hungry, and you gave me no meat; much more if it may be said, I was hungry, and you took my meat from me.

2.The judgment given against them all is thus far the same, (1.) That, their sin having risen to such a height, God will not turn away the punishment thereof. Though he has granted them a long reprieve, and has often turned away their punishment, yet now he will turn it away no longer, but justice shall take its course. "I will not revoke it (so some read it); I will not recall the voice which has gone forth from Zion to Jerusalem (Amo 1:2), speaking death and terror to the sinful nations." It is an irrevocable sentence. God has spoken it, and he will not call it back. Note, Though God bear long, he will not bear always, with those that provoke him; and, when the decree brings forth, it will bring up. (2.) That God will kindle a fire among them; this is said concerning all these evil neighbours, Amo 1:4, Amo 1:7, Amo 1:10, Amo 1:12, Amo 1:14. God will send a fire into their cities. When fires are kindled that lay cities, towns, and houses in ashes, whether designedly or casually, God must be acknowledged in it; they are of his sending. Sin stirs up the fire of his jealousy, and that kindles other fires.

II. Let us see what is mentioned, both by way of charge and by way of sentence, that is peculiar to each of them, that every one may take his portion.

1.Concerning Damascus, the head-city of Syria, a kingdom that was often vexatious to Israel. (1.) The peculiar sin of Damascus was using the Gileadites barbarously: They threshed Gilead with threshing-instruments of iron (Amo 1:3), which may be understood literally of their putting to the torture, or to cruel deaths, the inhabitants of Gilead whom they got into their hands, as David put the Ammonites under saws and harrows Sa2 12:31. We read with what inhumanity Hazael king of Syria prosecuted his wars with Israel (Kg2 8:12); he dashed their children, and ripped up their women with child; and see what desolations he made in their land, Kg2 10:32, Kg2 10:33. Or it may be taken figuratively, for his laying the country waste, and this very similitude is used in the history of it. Kg2 13:7, He destroyed them, and made them like the dust by threshing. Note, Men often do that unjustly and wickedly, and shall be severely reckoned with for it, which yet God just permits them to do. The church is called God's threshing, and the corn of his floor (Isa 21:10); but if men make it their threshing, and the chaff of their floor, they shall be sure to hear of it. (2.) The peculiar punishment of Damascus is [1.] That the fire which shall be sent shall fasten upon the court in the first place, not on the chief city, nor the country towns, but on the house of Hazael, which he built; and it shall devour the palaces of Ben-hadad, the royal palaces inhabited by the kings of Syria, many of whom were of that name. Note, Even royal palaces are no defence against the judgments of God, though ever so richly furnished, though ever so strongly fortified. [2.] That the enemy shall force his way into the city (Amo 1:5): I will break the bar of Damascus, and then the gate flies open. Or it may be understood figuratively: all that which is depended upon as the strength and safety of that great city shall fail, and prove insufficient. When God's judgments come with commission it is in vain to think of turning them out. [3.] That the people shall be destroyed with the sword: I will cut off the inhabitant from the plain of Aven, the valley of idolatry, for the gods of the Syrians were gods of the valleys (Kg1 20:23), were worshipped in valleys; as the idols of Israel were worshipped on the hills; him also that holdeth the sceptre of power, some petty king or other that used to boast of the sceptre he held from Beth-Eden, the house of pleasure. Both those that were given to idolatry and those that were given to sensuality should be cut off together. [4.] That the body of the nation shall be carried off. The people shall go into captivity unto Kir, which was in the country of the Medes. We find this fulfilled (Kg2 16:9) about fifty years after this, when the king of Assyria went up against Damascus, and took it, and carried the people of it captive to Kir, and slew Rezin, at the instigation of Ahaz king of Judah.

2.Concerning Gaza, a city of the Philistines, and now the metropolis of that country. (1.) The peculiar sin of the Philistines was carrying away captive the whole captivity, either of Israel or Judah, which some think refers to that inroad made upon Jehoram when they took away all the king's sons and all his substance (Ch2 21:17), or, perhaps, it refers to their seizing those that fled to them for shelter when Sennacherib invaded Judah, and selling them to the Grecians (Joe 3:4-6), or (as here) to the Edomites, who were always sworn enemies to the people of God. They spared none, but carried off all they could lay their hands on, designing, if possible, to cut off the name of Israel, Psa 83:4-7. (2.) The peculiar punishment of the Philistines is that the fire which God will send shall devour the palaces of Gaza, and that the inhabitants of the other cities of the Philistines, Ashdod (or Azotus), Ashkelon, and Ekron, shall all be cut off, and God will make as thorough work with them in their ruin as they would have made with God's people when they carried away the whole captivity; for even the remnant of them shall perish, Amo 1:8. Note, God will make a full end of those that think to make a full end of his church and people.

3.Concerning Tyre, that famous city of wealth and strength, that was itself a kingdom, Amo 1:9. (1.) The peculiar sin of Tyre is delivering up the whole captivity to Edom, that is, selling to the Edomites those of Israel that fled to them for shelter, or in any way fell into their hands; not caring what hardships they put upon them, so that they could but make gain of them to themselves. Herein they forgot the brotherly covenant, the league that was between Solomon and Hiram king of Tyre (Kg1 5:12), which was intimate that Hiram called Solomon his brother, Kg1 9:13. Note, It is a great aggravation of enmity and malice when it is the violation of friendship and of a brotherly covenant. (2.) Here is nothing peculiar in the punishment of Tyrus but that the palaces thereof shall be devoured, which was done when Nebuchadnezzar took it after thirteen years' siege. Their merchants were all princes, and their private houses were as palaces; but the fire shall make no more of them than of cottages.

4.Concerning Edom, the posterity of Esau. (1.) Their peculiar sin was an unmerciful, unwearied, pursuit of the people of God, and their taking all advantages against them to do them a mischief, Amo 1:11. He did pursue his brother with the sword, not only of old, when the king of Edom took up arms to oppose the children of Israel's passage through his border (Num 20:18), but ever since upon all occasions; they had not strength and courage enough to face them in the field of battle, but, whenever any other enemy had put Judah or Israel to flight, then the Edomites set in with the pursuers, fell upon the rear, slew those that were half dead already, and (as is usual with cowards when they have an enemy at an advantage) they did cast off all pity. Those that are least courageous are commonly most cruel. Edom was so; his malice destroyed his compassion (so the word is); he stripped himself of the tenderness of a man, and put on the fierceness of a beast of prey; and, as such a one, he did tear, his anger did tear perpetually. His cruelty was insatiable, and he never knew when he had sucked enough of the blood of Israel, but, like the horse-leech, still cried, Give, give. Nay, he kept his wrath for ever; when he wanted objects of his wrath, and opportunity to show it, yet he kept it in reserve (it rested in his bosom), he rolled it under his tongue as a sweet morsel, and had it ready to spit in the face of Israel upon the next occasion. Cursed be such cruel wrath, and anger so fierce, so outrageous, which makes men like the devil, who continually seeks to devour, and unlike to God, who keeps not his anger for ever. Edom's malice was unnatural, for thus he pursued his brother, whom he ought to have protected: it was hereditary, as if it had been entailed upon the family ever since Esau hated Jacob, and time itself could not wear it out, no, nor the brotherly conduct of Israel towards them (Deu 2:4), and the express law given to Israel (Deu 23:7), Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, for he is thy brother. (2.) Here is nothing peculiar in their punishment; but (Amo 1:12) a fire shall be sent to devour their palaces. Note, The fire of our anger against our brethren kindles the fire of God's anger against us.

5.Concerning the Ammonites, Amo 1:13-15. (1.) See how violently the fire of their anger turned against the people of God; they not only triumphed in their calamities (as we find, Eze 25:2, Eze 25:6), but they did themselves use them barbarously; they ripped up the women with child of Gilead, a piece of cruelty the very mention of which strikes a horror upon one's mind; one would think it is not possible that any of the human race should be so inhuman. Hazael was guilty of it, Kg2 8:12. It was done not only in a brutish rage, which falls without consideration upon all that comes before it, but with a devilish design to extirpate the race of Israel by killing not only all that were born, but all that were to be born, worse than Egyptian cruelty. It was that they might enlarge their border, that they might make the land of Gilead their own, and there might be none to lay claim to it or given them any disturbance in the possession of it. We find (Jer 49:1) that the Ammonites inherited Gad (that is, Gilead) under pretence that Israel had no sons, no heirs. We know how heavy the doom of those was, and how heinous their crime, who said, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and the inheritance shall be ours by occupancy. See what cruelty covetousness is the cause of, and what horrid practices those are often put upon that are greedy to enlarge their own border. (2.) See how violently the fire of God's anger burned against them; shall not God visit for these things done to any of mankind, especially when they are done to his own people? Shall not his soul be avenged on such a nation as this? No doubt, it shall. The fire shall be kindled with shouting in the day of battle, that is, war shall kindle the fire; it shall be a fire accompanied with the sword, or a roaring fire, which shall make a noise like that of soldiers ready to engage, and it shall be as a tempest in the day of the whirlwind, which comes swiftly, furiously, and bears down all before it. Or this tempest and whirlwind shall be as bellows to the fire, to make it burn the stronger, and spread the further. It is particularly threatened that their king and his princes shall go together into captivity, carried away by the king of Babylon, not long after Judah was. See what changes God's providence often makes with men, or rather their own sin; kings become captives, and princes prisoners. Milchom shall go into captivity; some understand it of the god of the Ammonites, whom they called Moloch - a king. He, and his princes, and his priests that attended him, shall to into captivity; their idol shall be so far from protecting them that it shall itself go into captivity with them. Note, Those who by violence and fraud seek to enlarge their own border will justly be expelled and excluded their own border; nor is it strange if those who make no conscience of invading the rights of others be able to make no resistance against those who invade theirs.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 3–15. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Amos
(Ver. 11 and following) Thus says the Lord: For three crimes of Edom, and for four, I will not revoke my judgment; Because he pursued his brother with the sword, and violated all pity, and his anger tore at them constantly, and he kept his wrath to the end. I will send fire into Teman, and it will consume the fortresses of Bozrah. LXX: Thus says the Lord: For three crimes of Edom, and for four, I will not turn away from them, because he pursued his brother with the sword and violated the womb above the earth, and seized his horror as a testimony, and kept his fury forever. And I will send fire into Teman, and it will consume the foundations of its walls. Edom himself is the same as Esau, so named because of the cooking of red lentils, whose birthright he lost with this nourishment: he is also called Seir, hairy and rough. Hence the mountains of the Edomites are called the mountains of Seir, and in Greek language Edom is called Idumea. This one pursued his brother with a sword, namely the sons of Jacob, concerning whom it is written more fully in the blessings of Isaac, to whom Jacob was blessed first, and afterwards Esau: so that the hatred of the brothers might be preserved in their descendants, and the Idumean people would persecute their brothers to such an extent that they would not even grant passage through the holy land to those leaving Egypt; and not only did he persecute his brother with a sword, but he violated mercy, or rather according to Symmachus' interpretation, his own womb: so that he would forget his kinship, and harden the bowels of mercy, and would not know that he was his brother, and would despise the womb of Rebekah, who had given birth to twin infants in one childbirth. And what follows: And he held on to his fury, and kept his indignation until the end, he shows his ancient hatred, which was never reconciled with peace. Therefore, he threatens punishment for sins, and he said: I will send fire into Theman, which is the region of the Edomites, and it extends to the southern part, which is called Theman: this province is called not only Theman, but also Daron and Nageb, because it faces the east, south, and the African wind. And when he says, 'He shall devour the houses of Bozrah,' it does not mean, as some suppose, another city, but Edom, fortified and well-fortified, according to what we read in Isaiah: 'Who is this that comes from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? This one, beautiful in his robe, walking in the greatness of his strength' (Isaiah 63:2)? Whatever we have said about Esau and Jacob, let us apply it to the Jews and the Christian people. For they, who were earthly and bloodthirsty, persecuted the brother Jacob, who supplanted them, and took away their firstborn, and persecuted with the sword, so that they seized the possessions and wealth of believers, which we read about in the Acts of the Apostles (Acts 2:4): and they violated mercy and the laws of nature, forgetting their mother Rebecca, who is interpreted as patience, and at the same time they were born in Christ: holding onto their ancient fury and anger, to this day in their synagogues they blaspheme the Christian people under the name of Nazarenes: and as long as they kill us, they want to be burned with fire. But the Lord will send fire into Theman, into the dry and deserted parts of Judaea (that are not irrigated by the rains of the prophets), and it will consume all their fortifications, even the foundations of its walls, so that with the complete collapse of all literal sense, the Church of Christ the Lord may be built upon its foundations. For misericordia, they translated the Septuagint as vulva. And for furore, they used horrorem. And for indignatione, they chose impetum, led by the ambiguity of the words: because Rehem signifies both the womb and mercy; Aphpho signifies his rage and horror; and Ebrath is said to mean both indignation and impulse. Furthermore, Armanoth (), which we have interpreted as houses, Aquila and Symmachus βάρεις, that is, homes; Theodotius transferred the inhabitants: only seventy and here and above, they called foundations.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
PASTORAL CARE 3:24
The [false teachers] are also to be admonished to consider well, how sacred Scripture is set up as a kind of lantern for us in the night of this life. When the words are not rightly understood, darkness is the result. And obviously, their perverse mind would not hurry them into a false understanding unless they were first inflated with pride. For while they think themselves wiser than others, they scorn to follow others in matters which these understand better. What is more, in order that they may extort from the untutored crowd a reputation for knowledge, they make every endeavor to discredit what these rightly understand and to confirm their own perverse views. Therefore, it is well said by the prophet, “They have ripped up the women with child of Gilead to enlarge their border.” Now Gilead is interpreted as meaning “a heap of testimony.” Since the whole congregation of the church together serves by its confession of it, as a witness to the truth, the church is not ineptly expressed as Gilead, for it witnesses to all truth concerning God by the mouth of all the faithful. But souls are said to be with child when they conceive an understanding of the Word by divine love, so that when they come to full term, they will bring forth the understanding conceived by them in showing forth their deeds. Again, “to enlarge the border” is to extend one’s own reputation. Thus “they ripped up the women with child of Gilead to extend their border”—that is to say, heretics by their perverse preaching slay the minds of the faithful who have already conceived some measure of the understanding of truth, and so they extend their reputation for knowledge. The hearts of little ones, already big with conception of the Word, they cleave with the sword of error, and thereby make a reputation, as it were, for their teaching. When, therefore, we endeavor to instruct these people not to entertain perverse views, we must first admonish them not to seek their own interests. For if the root of pride is cut away, the branches of false assertions become withered.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Amos 1:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.