Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Saying G3004, What G5101 shall we do G4160 to these G5125 men G444? for G1063 that G3754 indeed G3303 a notable G1110 miracle G4592 hath been done G1096 by G1223 them G846 is manifest G5318 to all them G3956 that dwell G2730 in Jerusalem G2419; and G2532 we cannot G3756 G1410 deny G720 it.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
“What can we do with these men?” they asked each other. “Why, anyone in Yerushalayim can see that a remarkable miracle has come about through them — we can’t possibly deny that.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“What shall we do with these men?” they asked. “It is clear to everyone living in Jerusalem that a remarkable miracle has occurred through them, and we cannot deny it.
Ask
American Standard Version
saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been wrought through them, is manifest to all that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
saying, “What shall we do to these men? Because indeed a notable miracle has been done through them, as can be plainly seen by all who dwell in Jerusalem, and we can’t deny it.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Saying, What shall we doe to these men? for surely a manifest signe is done by them, and it is openly knowen to all them that dwell in Hierusalem: and we cannot denie it.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
saying, `What shall we do to these men? because that, indeed, a notable sign hath been done through them, to all those dwelling in Jerusalem is manifest, and we are not able to deny it ;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 27,039 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 4:16 vividly captures the profound dilemma faced by the Jewish Sanhedrin as they confronted the apostles Peter and John. Following the undeniable healing of a lame man, the religious authorities, despite their desire to suppress the burgeoning Christian movement, were forced to acknowledge the public and irrefutable nature of the miracle. This verse serves as a powerful testament to the manifest power of God at work through His early disciples, presenting a truth that even their most ardent opponents could not deny.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is nestled within a critical narrative arc in the book of Acts, specifically following the miraculous healing of a man lame from birth at the Temple's Beautiful Gate, recounted in Acts 3:1-10. Peter's subsequent sermon, which boldly proclaimed Jesus' resurrection and called for repentance (Acts 3:11-26), led to the arrest of Peter and John by the Temple authorities (Acts 4:1-4). Acts 4:16 details the private deliberation of the Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish court, as they grappled with how to respond to an event so widely known and undeniable that it challenged their authority and threatened their established order. Their internal discussion here sets the stage for their subsequent command to the apostles to cease speaking in Jesus' name.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The Sanhedrin, composed primarily of Sadducees and Pharisees, represented the supreme religious and judicial authority in Judea under Roman rule. Their primary concerns included maintaining order, preserving their interpretation of Jewish law, and preventing any popular movements that might provoke Roman intervention. The healing occurred in a highly public space—the Temple—and involved a man well-known to the Jerusalem populace (Acts 3:2). This public visibility meant the miracle could not be easily dismissed as a rumor or a trick. The Sadducees, who did not believe in the resurrection of the dead, were particularly agitated by the apostles' preaching of Jesus' resurrection (Acts 4:2), seeing it as a direct challenge to their theological tenets and authority. The cultural expectation for signs and wonders, particularly in a messianic context, also made such events highly impactful and difficult to ignore.
  • Key Themes: Acts 4:16 powerfully highlights several key themes. Firstly, it underscores the undeniable evidence of God's power at work through the apostles. The miracle was not hidden but "manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem," leaving the authorities no room for denial. This public validation served as irrefutable proof of the divine origin of the apostles' actions and the truth of their message about Jesus. Secondly, it reveals the human opposition to divine truth when it challenges established power structures. Despite the clear evidence, the Sanhedrin's immediate concern was not to investigate the truth or embrace God's work, but to strategize how to suppress it, illustrating a universal human tendency to resist spiritual truth when it threatens comfort, tradition, or control. Lastly, the verse emphasizes the Gospel's public impact. The miracle served as a powerful public testimony, not just to the apostles' authority, but to the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the transformative power of His name, echoing the broader theme of the early church's growth being fueled by such undeniable signs and wonders.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • notable (Greek, gnōstós', G1110): Derived from the verb "to know," this word signifies something that is "well-known," "acquainted," or "manifest." In Acts 4:16, it emphasizes that the miracle was not obscure or questionable but was a publicly recognized and undeniable event. Its notoriety made it impossible for the Sanhedrin to dismiss it as a fabrication.
  • manifest (Greek, phanerós', G5318): This term means "shining," "apparent," "clear," or "publicly known." It reinforces the idea that the miracle was openly displayed and evident to everyone, not just a select few. The public nature of the healing meant that the Sanhedrin's attempt to suppress the truth would be futile, as the evidence was literally "out in the open" for all to see.
  • deny (Greek, arnéomai', G720): This word implies to "contradict," "disavow," "reject," or "abnegate." In this context, it highlights the Sanhedrin's inability to logically or factually refute the miracle. Their dilemma was not a lack of evidence, but a refusal to accept the implications of that evidence, leading them to acknowledge that they "cannot deny" what had occurred.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Saying, What shall we do to these men?": This opening phrase reveals the Sanhedrin's internal deliberation and their immediate focus on the apostles as a problem to be managed. It highlights their position of authority and their desire to control the narrative and the burgeoning Christian movement. Their question is not one of theological inquiry but of practical, political strategy.
  • "for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them": This clause provides the undeniable premise for their dilemma. The "notable miracle" (the healing of the lame man) is presented as an established fact, a powerful act that has occurred through the agency of Peter and John. The particle "indeed" (mén) emphasizes the certainty and concession of this fact, even by their opponents.
  • "[is] manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem;": This part of the verse underscores the public and undeniable nature of the miracle. It was not a private event but something "manifest" (openly evident) to the entire population of Jerusalem. This widespread knowledge meant that the Sanhedrin could not simply pretend it hadn't happened or dismiss it as a minor incident.
  • "and we cannot deny [it].": This concluding statement encapsulates the Sanhedrin's profound predicament. Despite their opposition to the apostles' message and their desire to suppress the movement, the evidence of the miracle was so overwhelming and publicly known that even they, the highest religious authority, were forced to admit its reality. This admission highlights the power of God's work to transcend human resistance.

Literary Devices

Acts 4:16 employs several potent literary devices. There is clear Irony in the Sanhedrin's position: as the supposed guardians of God's law and truth, they are confronted with an undeniable act of God's power, yet their primary concern is how to suppress it rather than embrace it. The phrase "manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem" uses a form of Hyperbole or Synecdoche, implying that the miracle was so widely known and evident that it was virtually impossible for anyone in the city to be unaware of it, thus emphasizing its irrefutable nature. The verse also presents a stark Contrast between divine power, which openly demonstrates itself, and human resistance, which, despite acknowledging the truth, seeks to deny its implications. Finally, the Sanhedrin's internal dialogue functions as an Argument from Evidence, where the undeniable fact of the miracle forces them into a corner, compelling them to acknowledge a truth they would rather ignore.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 4:16 powerfully illustrates the inherent tension between divine revelation and human resistance. The Sanhedrin's inability to deny the miracle, despite their deep-seated opposition to the apostles' message, speaks to the self-authenticating nature of God's truth and power. God's work, when manifest, often leaves no room for genuine intellectual denial, though it may still be met with moral or volitional rejection. This passage underscores that God's kingdom advances not by human strategy or persuasion alone, but by the undeniable demonstration of His power, which confronts individuals and institutions with a choice: to acknowledge and submit, or to resist and suppress. The Sanhedrin's dilemma reveals the spiritual blindness that can afflict even those who claim to serve God when their own power, tradition, or comfort are threatened by His living truth.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Acts 4:16 offers profound insights for believers today. It reminds us that the truth of God, when powerfully demonstrated, can be undeniably evident even to those who are hostile to it. This should embolden us in our witness: while not every act of God will be a public miracle, the transformative power of the Gospel in lives, communities, and history is a testimony that cannot ultimately be denied. We are called to live and speak with integrity, knowing that God's truth carries its own weight. Furthermore, this verse serves as a sober warning against intellectual and spiritual dishonesty. Like the Sanhedrin, we can be tempted to suppress truths that challenge our comfort zones, our preconceived notions, or our established ways of doing things. True faith requires a willingness to confront and embrace undeniable evidence of God's work, even when it demands repentance, change, or a reordering of our priorities. Our task is to faithfully proclaim, demonstrate, and live out the truth of Christ, trusting that God's work will ultimately prevail, regardless of human opposition.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be tempted to deny or suppress a truth about God or His will because it challenges my comfort or control?
  • How can I, as a believer, ensure that my life and actions are a "manifest" testimony to God's power, making His truth undeniable to others?
  • When facing opposition or skepticism, how does the Sanhedrin's forced admission in Acts 4:16 encourage me to continue boldly proclaiming the Gospel?

FAQ

What does Acts 4:16 reveal about the nature of miracles in the early church?

Answer: Acts 4:16 reveals that miracles in the early church were not merely private, isolated events, but often public, verifiable demonstrations of God's power. The healing of the lame man was "manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem," meaning it was widely known and impossible to deny. This public nature served to authenticate the apostles' message and the power of Jesus' name, providing undeniable evidence that God was indeed working through them. These "notable miracles" were not just wonders but "signs" (sēmeion), pointing to the greater reality of God's presence and the truth of the Gospel message.

How did the Sanhedrin respond to such undeniable evidence, and what does this teach us?

Answer: Despite acknowledging that "a notable miracle hath been done by them [is] manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny [it]," the Sanhedrin's response was not repentance or belief, but an attempt to suppress the truth. They decided to strictly warn Peter and John not to speak or teach in the name of Jesus (Acts 4:17-18). This teaches us that intellectual acknowledgment of truth does not automatically lead to spiritual submission. Human hearts, driven by fear, self-preservation, or a desire to maintain power, can resist even the most undeniable evidence of God's work. It highlights the spiritual battle against unbelief and the human tendency to love darkness rather than light (John 3:19).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Acts 4:16, though focusing on the Sanhedrin's dilemma, profoundly points to Christ. The "notable miracle" was performed "by them" (Peter and John) but explicitly "in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth" (Acts 3:6). The Sanhedrin's inability to deny the miracle is an implicit acknowledgment of the power of the resurrected Christ, whose authority was now being demonstrated through His followers. Their resistance to the apostles' message mirrors their earlier rejection and crucifixion of Jesus Himself, revealing a consistent pattern of human opposition to divine truth. However, just as Jesus' own resurrection was the ultimate undeniable sign, this miracle served as a continuing testament to His living power, fulfilling His promise that His disciples would do "greater works" because He was going to the Father (John 14:12). The Sanhedrin's quandary ultimately underscores that the redemptive work initiated by Christ, empowered by the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:8), cannot be contained or denied by human decree, but will inevitably spread, even in the face of the world's hatred (John 15:18-20).

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 4 verses 15–22

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the issue of the trial of Peter and John before the council. They came off now with flying colours, because they must be trained up to sufferings by degrees, and by less trials be prepared for greater. They now but run with the footmen; hereafter we shall have them contending with horses, Jer 12:5.

I. Here is the consultation and resolution of the court about this matter, and their proceeding thereupon.

1.The prisoners were ordered to withdraw (Act 4:15): They commanded them to go aside out of the council, willing enough to get clear of them (they spoke so home to their consciences), and not willing they should hear the acknowledgements that were extorted from them; but, though they might not hear from them, we have them here upon record. The designs of Christ's enemies are carried on in close cabals, and they dig deep, as if they would hide their counsels from the Lord.

2.A debate arose upon this matter: They conferred among themselves; every one is desired to speak his mind freely, and to give advice upon this important affair. Now the scripture was fulfilled that the rulers would take counsel together against the Lord, and against his anointed, Psa 2:2. The question proposed was, What shall we do to these men? Act 4:16. If they would have yielded to the convincing commanding power of truth, it had been easy to say what they should do to these men. They should have placed them at the head of their council, and received their doctrine, and been baptized by them in the name of the Lord Jesus, and joined in fellowship with them. But, when men will not be persuaded to do what they should do, it is no marvel that they are ever and anon at a loss what to do. The truths of Christ, if men would but entertain them as they should, would give them no manner of trouble or uneasiness; but, if they hold them or imprison them in unrighteousness (Rom 1:18), they will find them a burdensome stone that they will not know what to do with, Zac 12:3.

3.They came at last to a resolution, in two things: -

(1.)That it was not safe to punish the apostles for what they had done. Very willingly would they have done it, but they had not courage to do it, because the people espoused their cause, and cried up the miracle; and they stood now in as much awe of them as they had done formerly, when they durst not lay hands of Christ for fear of the people. By this it appears that the outcry of the mob against our Saviour was a forced or managed thing, the stream soon returned to its former channel. Now they could not find how they might punish Peter and John, what colour they might have for it, because of the people. They knew it would be an unrighteous thing to punish them, and therefore should have been restrained from it by the fear of God; but they considered it only as a dangerous thing, and therefore were held in from it only by the fear of the people. For, [1.] The people were convinced of the truth of the miracle; it was a notable miracle, gnōston sēmeion - a known miracle; it was known that they did it in Christ's name, and that Christ himself had often the like before. This was a known instance of the power of Christ, and a proof of his doctrine. That it was a great miracle, and wrought for the confirmation of the doctrine they preached (for it was a sign), was manifest to all that dwelt in Jerusalem: it was an opinion universally received, and, the miracle being wrought at the gate of the temple, universal notice was taken of it; and they themselves, with all the craftiness and all the effrontery they had, could not deny it to be a true miracle; every body would have hooted at them if they had. They could easily deny it to their own consciences, but not to the world. The proofs of the gospel were undeniable. [2.] They went further, and were not only convinced of the truth of the miracle, but all men glorified God for that which was done. Even those that were not persuaded by it to believe in Christ were yet so affected with it, as a mercy to a poor man and an honour to their country, that they could not but give praise to God for it; even natural religion taught them to do this. And, if the priests had punished Peter and John for that for which all men glorified God, they would have lost all their interest in the people, and been abandoned as enemies both to God and man. Thus therefore their wrath shall be made to praise God, and the remainder thereof shall be restrained.

(2.)That it was nevertheless necessary to silence them for the future, Act 4:17, Act 4:18. They could not prove that they had said or done any thing amiss, and yet they must no more say nor do what they have done. All their care is that the doctrine of Christ spread no further among the people; as if that healing institution were a plague begun, the contagion of which must be stopped. See how the malice of hell fights against the counsels of heaven; God will have the knowledge of Christ to spread all the world over, but the chief priests would have it spread no further, which he that sits in heaven laughs at. Now, to prevent the further spreading of this doctrine, [1.] They charge the apostles never to preach it any more. Be it enacted by their authority (which they think every Israelite is bound in conscience to submit to) that no man speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus, Act 4:18. We do not find that they give them any reason why the doctrine of Christ must be suppressed; they cannot say it is false or dangerous, or of any ill tendency, and they are ashamed to own the true reason, that it testifies against their hypocrisy and wickedness, and shocks their tyranny. But, Stat pro ratione voluntas - They can assign no reason but their will. "We strictly charge and command you, not only that you do not preach this doctrine publicly, but that you speak henceforth to no man, not to any particular person privately, in this name," Act 4:17. There is not a greater service done to the devil's kingdom than the silencing of faithful ministers; and putting those under a bushel that are the lights of the world. [2.] They threaten them if they do, strictly threaten them: it is at their peril. This court will reckon itself highly affronted if they do, and they shall fall under its displeasure. Christ had not only charged them to preach the gospel to every creature, but had promised to bear them out in it, and reward them for it. Now these priests not only forbid the preaching of the gospel, but threaten to punish it as a heinous crime; but those who know how to put a just value upon the world's threatenings, though they be threatenings of slaughter that it breathes out, Act 9:1.

II. Here is the courageous resolution of the prisoners to go on in their work, notwithstanding the resolutions of this court, and their declaration of this resolution, Act 4:19, Act 4:20. Peter and John needed not confer together to know one another's minds (for they were both actuated by one and the same Spirit), but agree presently in the same sentiments, and jointly put in the answer: "Whether it be right in the sight of God, to whom both you and we are accountable, to hearken unto you more than unto God, we appeal to yourselves, judge you; for we cannot forbear speaking to every body the things which we have seen and heard, and are ourselves full of, and are charged to publish." The prudence of the serpent would have directed them to be silent, and, though they could not with a good conscience promise that they would not preach the gospel any more, yet they needed not tell the rulers that they would. But the boldness of the lion directed them thus to set both the authority and the malignity of their persecutors at defiance. They do, in effect, tell them that they are resolved to go on in preaching, and justify themselves in it with two things: - 1. The command of God: "You charge us not to preach the gospel; he has charged us to preach it, has committed it to us as a trust, requiring us upon our allegiance faithfully to dispense it; now whom must we obey, God or you?" Here they appeal to one of the communes notitiae - to a settled and acknowledged maxim in the law of nature, that if men's commands and God's interfere God's commands must take place. It is a rule in the common law of England that if any statute be made contrary to the law of God it is null and void. Nothing can be more absurd than to hearken unto weak and fallible men, that are fellow-creatures and fellow-subjects, more than unto a God that is infinitely wise and holy, our Creator and sovereign Lord, and the Judge to whom we are all accountable. The case is so plain, so uncontroverted and self-evident, that we will venture to leave it to yourselves to judge of it, though you are biassed and prejudiced. Can you think it right in the sight of God to break a divine command in obedience to a human injunction? That is right indeed which is right in the sight of God; for his judgment, we are sure, is according to truth, and therefore by that we ought to govern ourselves. 2. The convictions of their consciences. Even if they had not had such an express command from heaven to preach the doctrine of Christ, yet they could not but speak, and speak publicly, those things which they had seen and heard. Like Elihu, they were full of this matter, and the Spirit within them constrained them, they must speak, that they might be refreshed, Job 32:18, Job 32:20. (1.) They felt the influence of it upon themselves, what a blessed change it had wrought upon them, had brought them into a new world, and therefore they could not but speak of it: and those speak the doctrine of Christ best that have felt the power of it, and tasted the sweetness of it, and have themselves been deeply affected with it; it is as a fire in their bones, Jer 20:9. (2.) They knew the importance of it to others. They look with concern upon perishing souls, and know that they cannot escape eternal ruin but by Jesus Christ, and therefore will be faithful to them in giving them warning, and showing them the right way. They are things which we have seen and heard, and therefore will be faithful to them in giving them warning, and showing them the right way. They are things which we only have seen and heard, and therefore, if we do not publish them, who will? Who can? Knowing the favour, as well as the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; for the love of Christ and the love of souls constrain us, Co2 5:11, Co2 5:14.

III. Here is the discharge of the prisoners (Act 4:21): They further threatened them, and thought they frightened them, and then let them go. There were many whom they terrified into an obedience to their unrighteous decrees; they knew how to keep men in awe with their excommunication (Joh 9:22), and thought they could have the same influence upon the apostles that they had upon other men; but they were deceived, for they had been with Jesus. They threatened them, and that was all they did now: when they had done this they let them go, 1. Because they durst not contradict the people, who glorified God for that which was done, and would have been ready (at least they thought so) to pull them out of their seats, if they had punished the apostles for doing it. As rulers by the ordinance of God are made a terror and restraint to wicked people, so people are sometimes by the providence of God made a terror and restrain to wicked rulers. 2. Because they could not contradict the miracle: For (Act 4:22) the man was above forty years old on whom this miracle of healing was shown. And therefore, (1.) The miracle was so much the greater, he having been lame from his mother's womb, Act 3:2. The older he grew the more inveterate the disease was, and the more hardly cured. If those that are grown into years, and have been long accustomed to evil, are cured of their spiritual impotency to good, and thereby of their evil customs, the power of divine grace is therein so much the more magnified. (2.) The truth of it was so much the better attested; for the man being above forty years old, he was able, like the blind man whom Christ healed, when he was asked, to speak for himself, Joh 9:21.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 15–22. Public domain.
Copy as
John ChrysostomAD 407
HOMILIES ON ROMANS 15.37
For what is really marvelous is this, that though they were held in prison and made answerable to charges, though they were imprisoned and beaten, their enemies were still at a loss and in a quandary, since the very things by which they expected to prevail brought about their own downfall. For neither king nor people, neither ranks of demons nor the devil himself had the power to get the better of the apostles, but all were overcome at a very great disadvantage, seeing everything they had planned against them fall on their own heads. Because of this he also says, “we are more than conquerors.” For this rule of victory was new: to prevail through their adversaries and never be overcome, but go forth to these struggles as masters of the end.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 10
"But when they had commanded them to go aside out of the council, they conferred among themselves, saying, What are we to do to these men?" See the difficulty they are in, and how the fear of men again does everything. As in the case of Christ, they were not able to undo what is done, nor to cast it into the shade, but for all their hindering, the Faith did but gain ground the more; so was it now. "What shall we do?" O the folly! to suppose that those who had tasted of the conflict, would now take fright at it: to expect, impotent as their efforts had proved in the beginning, to effect something new, after such a specimen of oratory as had been exhibited! The more they wished to hinder, the more the business grew upon their hands. But what say they? "For that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it. But that it spread no further among the people, let us straightly threaten them, that they speak henceforth to no man in this name."
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 10
"What shall we do?" O the folly! to suppose that those who had tasted of the conflict, would now take fright at it: to expect, impotent as their efforts had proved in the beginning, to effect something new, after such a specimen of oratory as had been exhibited! The more they wished to hinder, the more the business grew upon their hands. But what say they? "For that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it."
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Acts 10
"But that it spread no further among the people." And yet it was palpable to all men! But such is the nature of wickedness: everywhere it is shamed. "Let us straitly threaten them." What sayest thou? Threaten? And expect ye to stop the preaching? And yet all beginnings are hard and trying. Ye slew the Master, and did not stop it: and now, if ye threaten, do ye expect to turn us back? The imprisonment did not prevail with us to speak submissively, and shall ye prevail?
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 4:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.