Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, as his fathers had done: he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And he did H6213 that which was evil H7451 in the sight H5869 of the LORD H3068, as his fathers H1 had done H6213: he departed H5493 not from the sins H2403 of Jeroboam H3379 the son H1121 of Nebat H5028, who made Israel H3478 to sin H2398.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He did what was evil from ADONAI's perspective, just as his ancestors had done; he did not turn from all the sins of Yarov'am the son of N'vat, who made Isra'el sin.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And he did evil in the sight of the LORD, as his fathers had done. He did not turn away from the sins that Jeroboam son of Nebat had caused Israel to commit.
Ask
American Standard Version
And he did that which was evil in the sight of Jehovah, as his fathers had done: he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, wherewith he made Israel to sin.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
He did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, as his fathers had done: he didn’t depart from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, with which he made Israel to sin.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And did euill in the sight of the Lord, as did his fathers: for he departed not from the sinnes of Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat, which made Israel to sinne.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and he doth the evil thing in the eyes of Jehovah, as did his fathers, he hath not turned aside from the sins of Jeroboam son of Nebat that he caused Israel to sin.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 9,935 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Kings 15:9 delivers a damning theological indictment against King Zachariah of Israel, stating unequivocally that he "did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD." This assessment underscores his unwavering adherence to the established pattern of apostasy set by his royal predecessors, specifically highlighting his failure to deviate from "the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin." The verse thus encapsulates the profound spiritual bankruptcy and persistent idolatry that characterized the Northern Kingdom's leadership, serving as a concise summary of its covenant unfaithfulness and foreshadowing its inevitable decline and divine judgment.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within 2 Kings 15, a chapter that vividly portrays the extreme political instability and rapid succession of kings in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, frequently through violent regicide. Zachariah's brief six-month reign (2 Kings 15:8) is abruptly terminated by his assassination, a fulfillment of the divine prophecy given to Jehu in 2 Kings 10:30 that his dynasty would endure for four generations. Zachariah, being the fourth and final king of Jehu's line, marks the end of this promised, albeit conditional, stability. The recurring phrase "he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD" functions as a formulaic theological judgment applied to nearly every king of Israel throughout the books of Kings, underscoring a consistent pattern of covenant unfaithfulness that pervades the narrative of the Northern Kingdom from its inception with Jeroboam I until its ultimate downfall and exile.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of Zachariah's reign, approximately 753 BCE, was one of profound political and spiritual decay for the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The formidable Assyrian Empire was rapidly expanding its dominion, posing an imminent and existential threat to the smaller nations of the Levant, including Israel. Internally, the kingdom was plagued by chronic regicide and political fragmentation, indicative of a severe breakdown of social and moral order. Culturally, the "sins of Jeroboam" refer specifically to the state-sanctioned idolatry introduced by Jeroboam I, who, upon the division of the kingdom, established golden calves for worship at Bethel and Dan (see 1 Kings 12:28-30). This was a deliberate political maneuver designed to prevent his subjects from returning to Jerusalem to worship at the Temple, thereby securing his own throne. However, this act constituted a direct and egregious violation of the First and Second Commandments (Exodus 20:3-5), fundamentally corrupting Israel's worship and leading the people away from the exclusive worship of Yahweh.
  • Key Themes: The verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes woven throughout the books of Kings. Firstly, Generational Sin and Apostasy is starkly evident in the phrase "as his fathers had done," illustrating a persistent, inherited pattern of disobedience that permeated the Israelite monarchy. Each successive king, rather than repenting and leading the nation back to God, continued the spiritual rebellion, highlighting a deep-seated resistance to God's covenant. Secondly, the Destructive Nature of Idolatry is central, specifically through the repeated condemnation of "the sins of Jeroboam." This highlights how a foundational act of spiritual compromise can become an entrenched, national sin that ultimately leads to divine judgment and national ruin, as seen in Israel's eventual exile (2 Kings 17:7-23). Lastly, the theme of Leadership Accountability is presented with striking clarity. Jeroboam I "made Israel to sin," underscoring the immense influence and profound responsibility of national leaders to guide their people in righteousness. The consistent failure of Israel's kings to lead in faithfulness directly contributed to the nation's spiritual decline and its ultimate demise, serving as a powerful warning about the profound impact of those in authority.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • evil (Hebrew, ra', H7451): The term רַע (ra'), translated as "evil" (H7451), carries significant theological weight beyond mere moral wrongdoing. In the context of the books of Kings, "doing evil in the sight of the LORD" primarily signifies a king's failure to uphold the covenant with Yahweh, particularly through engaging in or tolerating idolatry, rather than simply political or military incompetence. This word denotes a profound spiritual rebellion, a deliberate turning away from God's revealed will, which was the ultimate standard for evaluating a monarch's reign. Its semantic range includes concepts like adversity, calamity, and harm, all of which were spiritual consequences of covenant unfaithfulness.
  • sins (Hebrew, chaṭṭâʼâh, H2403): The noun חַטָּאת (chaṭṭâʼâh, H2403), translated as "sins," refers to an offense, often habitual sinfulness, and its associated penalty, occasion, or expiation. In the phrase "sins of Jeroboam," it specifically denotes the systemic idolatry established by Jeroboam I—the worship of golden calves at Bethel and Dan. This was not merely one transgression among many, but the foundational and persistent sin of the Northern Kingdom, a direct violation of God's command against making graven images and worshipping other gods. Its repeated mention underscores its centrality to Israel's apostasy and the divine judgment against it.
  • made...to sin (Hebrew, châṭâʼ, H2398): The verb חָטָא (châṭâʼ, H2398), meaning "to miss" or "to sin," appears here in its Hiphil (causative) form, heḥĕṭî, "made to sin." This causative verbal form highlights the active and influential role of Jeroboam I. It implies that his actions were not merely personal transgressions but had a profound, corrupting effect on the entire nation, actively leading them into systematic idolatry. This phrase emphasizes the immense responsibility of leadership and the devastating consequences when those in authority lead their people astray from God.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And he did [that which was] evil in the sight of the LORD": This is a standard, formulaic judgment in the books of Kings, indicating a king's spiritual and moral failure from God's perspective. It signifies a profound breach of covenant faithfulness, often centered on idolatry and a disregard for God's laws, rather than merely political or military missteps. This divine evaluation serves as the ultimate assessment of a king's reign, highlighting that God's perspective is the ultimate arbiter of good and evil.
  • "as his fathers had done": This clause highlights the generational nature of sin and apostasy within the Northern Kingdom's monarchy. Zachariah did not deviate from the ungodly patterns of his predecessors, indicating a deep-seated spiritual corruption that permeated the royal line and the nation as a whole. It underscores a cycle of disobedience that remained unbroken, demonstrating a lack of repentance and a continued rejection of God's covenant.
  • "he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat": This specifies the particular nature of Zachariah's "evil." It wasn't just general wickedness but a continuation of the foundational idolatry introduced by Jeroboam I – the worship of golden calves. This specific reference emphasizes the enduring and pervasive nature of this particular sin, which became the hallmark of Israel's spiritual rebellion and the primary cause of God's judgment against them, demonstrating its deep entrenchment in the national consciousness.
  • "who made Israel to sin": This final phrase attributes the widespread apostasy of the Northern Kingdom directly to the actions of its first king, Jeroboam I. It underscores the profound and lasting impact of a leader's choices, demonstrating how one individual's sin can set a precedent that corrupts an entire nation and leads generations astray from God's truth, carrying immense responsibility for the spiritual well-being of the populace.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several significant literary devices that amplify its theological message. Formulaic Language is prominently featured in the recurring phrase "he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD," which establishes a consistent theological standard for evaluating kings and underscores the divine perspective on their reigns. The Repetition of "the sins of Jeroboam" throughout Kings functions as a powerful motif, highlighting the persistent nature of Israel's foundational idolatry and its central role in their spiritual decline. This repetition also serves as a form of Foreshadowing, signaling the inevitable judgment and destruction that will befall a nation so deeply entrenched in rebellion. Furthermore, there is an element of Irony in the kings' consistent failure; they were divinely appointed to be shepherds of God's people, leading them in righteousness and covenant faithfulness, but instead, they "made Israel to sin," actively leading them away from the very God who established them and to whom they owed their allegiance.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The persistent pattern of sin described in 2 Kings 15:9, particularly the adherence to the "sins of Jeroboam," highlights the pervasive nature of idolatry and the profound impact of leadership on a nation's spiritual trajectory. This verse underscores God's unwavering standard of righteousness and His consistent judgment against unfaithfulness, demonstrating that covenant disobedience, especially through idolatry, inevitably leads to divine wrath and societal decay. It speaks to the concept of generational sin, not as an inescapable curse, but as a deeply entrenched pattern of behavior and belief that requires intentional repentance and a radical turning back to God. The failure of Israel's kings to break this cycle ultimately sealed the Northern Kingdom's fate, serving as a sober reminder that true worship and obedience are paramount for individual and national flourishing and that God's covenant demands exclusive devotion.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

2 Kings 15:9 offers a profound mirror for self-examination and societal critique, challenging us to consider what "evil in the sight of the LORD" truly means in our own lives and contexts. This moves beyond superficial morality to evaluate our deepest loyalties and the objects of our worship. Are we, like Zachariah, passively continuing in "the sins of Jeroboam"—modern forms of idolatry that subtly or overtly divert our ultimate devotion from God alone? This could manifest as placing ultimate trust in wealth, power, comfort, personal ambition, or even human ideologies and political systems, rather than in the Creator and Redeemer. The verse also underscores the immense responsibility of leadership, whether in families, churches, communities, or nations. Those in positions of influence have a profound capacity to "make others sin" or to lead them toward righteousness and faithfulness. We are called to be discerning followers and responsible leaders, actively seeking to identify and break cycles of ungodly patterns, both personally and corporately, by intentionally turning back to God's ways, aligning our lives with His unchanging truth, and fostering environments where true worship flourishes.

Questions for Reflection

  • What are the "sins of Jeroboam" in my own life or in my community today, where I might be departing from the exclusive worship of God and embracing subtle or overt forms of idolatry?
  • How do my choices, particularly as a leader (in any capacity—parent, friend, employee, employer, citizen), influence those around me towards or away from God's righteous standards?
  • What generational patterns of sin, disobedience, or spiritual apathy do I need to identify and actively seek to break through sincere repentance and reliance on God's transformative grace?
  • In what specific ways does my understanding of "evil in the sight of the LORD" align with or differ from God's biblical standard as revealed in His Word?

FAQ

Why is Jeroboam's sin mentioned so frequently throughout the books of Kings?

Answer: Jeroboam's sin is mentioned repeatedly because it represents the foundational and enduring spiritual rebellion of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. When the kingdom divided, Jeroboam I, its first king, established golden calves at Bethel and Dan as alternative worship sites to prevent his subjects from returning to Jerusalem for worship (see 1 Kings 12:26-30). This was a politically motivated act that constituted a direct violation of the First and Second Commandments, leading the entire nation into systematic idolatry. It became the defining apostasy of the Northern Kingdom, a deep-seated spiritual corruption that no subsequent king managed to eradicate. The consistent mention of "the sins of Jeroboam" serves as a theological indictment, highlighting the persistent unfaithfulness that ultimately led to Israel's downfall and exile, as prophesied and recorded in 2 Kings 17:7-23). It underscores the profound and lasting consequences of a leader's decision to lead a people astray from God's covenant.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The tragic cycle of sin, failed leadership, and persistent idolatry observed in 2 Kings 15:9, culminating in the demise of the Northern Kingdom, powerfully underscores humanity's desperate need for a perfect King and a new covenant. The kings of Israel, including Zachariah, consistently "did evil in the sight of the LORD" and "made Israel to sin," demonstrating the inherent inability of human leadership to truly redeem or lead a people into lasting righteousness. This narrative points forward to Jesus Christ, the ultimate King who perfectly fulfills God's righteous demands. Unlike the kings of Israel who departed not from sin, Jesus "committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in his mouth" (1 Peter 2:22). He is the true Shepherd who does not lead His flock astray but guides them in paths of righteousness (Psalm 23:3). Moreover, where the "sins of Jeroboam" established a system of false worship and led to national ruin, Christ, through His perfect life, atoning sacrifice, and glorious resurrection, established a new covenant, making true worship in spirit and truth possible for all who believe (John 4:23-24). He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, breaking the cycle of generational sin and offering forgiveness, reconciliation, and new life to all who turn to Him in faith (John 1:29). In Christ, the systemic failure of Israel's kings is redeemed, and the promise of a righteous, eternal kingdom is finally realized, a kingdom where the King Himself is perfectly righteous and leads His people in perfect obedience.

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 15 verses 8–31

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The best days of the kingdom of Israel were while the government was in Jehu's family. In his reign, and the next three reigns, though there were many abominable corruptions and miserable grievances in Israel, yet the crown went in succession, the kings died in their beds, and some care was taken of public affairs; but, now that those days are at an end, the history which we have in these verses of about thirty-three years represents the affairs of that kingdom in the utmost confusion imaginable. Woe to those that were with child (Kg2 15:16) and to those that gave suck in those days, for then must needs be great tribulations, when, for the transgression of the land, many were the princes thereof.

I. Let us observe something, in general, concerning these unhappy revolutions and the calamities which must needs attend them - these bad times, as they may truly be called. 1. God had tried the people of Israel both with judgments and mercies, explained and enforced by his servants the prophets, and yet they continued impenitent and unreformed, and therefore God justly brought these miseries upon them, as Moses had warned them. If you will yet walk contrary to me, I will punish you yet seven times more, Lev 26:21, etc. 2. God made good his promise to Jehu, that his sons to the fourth generation after him should sit upon the throne of Israel, which was a greater favour than was shown to any of the royal families either before or after his. God had said it should be so (Kg2 10:30) and we are told in this chapter (Kg2 15:12) that so it came to pass. See how punctual God is to his promises. These calamities God long designed for Israel, and they deserved them, yet they were not inflicted till that word had taken effect to the full. Thus God rewarded Jehu for his zeal in destroying the worship of Baal and the house of Ahab; and yet, when the measure of the sins of the house of Jehu was full, God avenged upon it the blood then shed, called the blood of Jezreel, Hos 1:4. 3. All these kings did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord, for they walked in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat. Though at variance with one another, yet in this they agreed, to keep up idolatry, and the people loved to have it so; though they were emptied from vessel to vessel, that taste remained in them, and that scent was not changed. It was sad indeed when their government was so often altered, yet never for the better - that among all those contending interests none of them should think it as much their interest to destroy the calves as others had done to support them. 4. Each of these (except one) conspired against his predecessor, and slew him - Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea, all traitors and murderers, and yet all kings awhile, one of them ten, another twenty, and another nine years; for God may suffer wickedness to prosper and to carry away the wealth and honours awhile, but, sooner or later, blood shall have blood, and he that dealt treacherously shalt be dealt treacherously with. One wicked man is often made a scourge to another, and every wicked man, at length, a ruin to himself. 5. The ambition of the great men made the nation miserable. Here is Tiphsah, a city of Israel, barbarously destroyed, with all the coasts thereof, by one of these pretenders (Kg2 15:16), and no doubt it was through blood that each of them waded to the throne, nor could any of these kings perish alone. No land can have greater pests, nor Israel worse troubles, than such men as care not how much the welfare and repose of their country are sacrificed to their revenge and affectation of dominion. 6. While the nation was thus shattered by divisions at home the kings of Assyria, first one (Kg2 15:19) and then another (Kg2 15:29), came against it and did what they pleased. Nothing does more towards the making of a nation an easy prey to a common enemy than intestine broils and contests for the sovereignty. Happy the land where that is settled. 7. This was the condition of Israel just before they were quite ruined and carried away captive, for that was in the ninth year of Hoshea, the last of these usurpers. If they had, in these days of confusion and perplexity, humbled themselves before God and sought his face, that final destruction might have been prevented; but when God judgeth he will overcome. These factions, the fruit of an evil spirit sent among them, hastened that captivity, for a kingdom thus divided against itself will soon come to desolation.

II. Let us take a short view of the particular reigns.

1.Zachariah, the son of Jeroboam, began to reign in the thirty-eighth year of Azariah, or Uzziah, king of Judah, Kg2 15:8. Some of the most critical chronologers reckon that between Jeroboam and his son Zachariah the throne was vacant twenty-two years, others eleven years, through the disturbances and dissensions that were in the kingdom; and then it was not strange that Zachariah was deposed before he was well seated on the throne: he reigned but six months, and then Shallum slew him before the people, perhaps as Caesar was slain in the senate, or he put him to death publicly as a criminal, with the approbation of the people, to whom he had, some way or other, made himself odious; so ended the line of Jehu.

2.But had Shallum peace, who slew his master? No, he had not (Kg2 15:13), one month of days measured his reign and then he was cut off; perhaps to this the prophet, who then lived, refers (Hos 5:7), Now shall a month devour them with their portions. That dominion seldom lasts long which is founded in blood and falsehood. Menahem, either provoked by his crime or animated by his example, soon served him as he had served his master - slew him and reigned in his stead, Kg2 15:14. Probably he was general in the army, which then lay encamped at Tirzah, and, hearing of Shallum's treason and usurpation, hastened to punish it, as Omri did that of Zimri in a like case, Kg1 16:17.

3.Menahem held the kingdom ten years, Kg2 15:17. But, whereas we have heard that the kings of the house of Israel were merciful kings (Kg1 20:31), this Menahem (the scandal of his country) was so prodigiously cruel to those of his own nation who hesitated a little at submitting to him that he not only ruined a city, and the coasts thereof, but, forgetting that he himself was born of a woman, ripped up all the women with child, Kg2 15:16. We may well wonder that ever it should enter into the heart of any man to be so barbarous, and to be so perfectly lost to humanity itself. By these cruel methods he hoped to strengthen himself and to frighten all others into his interests; but it seems he did not gain his point, for when the king of Assyria came against him, (1.) So little confidence had he in his people that he durst not meet him as an enemy, but was obliged, at a vast expense, to purchase a peace with him. (2.) Such need had he of help to confirm the kingdom in his hand that he made it part of his bargain with him (a bargain which, no doubt, the king of Assyria knew how to make a good hand of another time) that he should assist him against his own subjects that were disaffected to him. The money wherewith he purchased his friendship was a vast sum, no less than 1000 talents of silver (Kg2 15:19), which Menahem exacted, it is probable, by military execution, of all the mighty men of wealth, very considerately sparing the poor, and laying the burden (as was fit) on those that were best able to bear it; being raised, it was given to the king of Assyria, as pay for his army, fifty shekels of silver for each man in it. Thus he got clear of the king of Assyria for this time; he staid not to quarter in the land (Kg2 15:20), but his army now got so rich a booty with so little trouble that it encouraged them to come again, not long after, when they laid all waste. Thus was he the betrayer of his country that should have been the protector of it.

4.Pekahiah, the son of Menahem, succeeded his father, but reigned only two years, and then was treacherously slain by Pekah, falling under the load both of his own and of his father's wickedness. It is repeated concerning him as before that he departed not from the sins of Jeroboam. Still this is mentioned, to show that God was righteous in bringing that destruction upon them which came not long after, because they hated to be reformed, Kg2 15:24. Pekah, it seems, had some persons of figure in his interest, two of whom are here named (Kg2 15:25), and with their help he compassed his design.

5.Pekah, though he got the kingdom by treason, kept it twenty years (Kg2 15:27), so long it was before his violent dealing returned upon his own head, but it returned at last. This Pekah, son of Remaliah, (1.) Made himself more considerable abroad than any of these usurpers, for he was, even in the latter end of his time (in the reign of Ahaz, which began in his seventeenth year), a great terror to the kingdom of Judah, as we find, Isa 7:1, etc. (2.) He lost a great part of his kingdom to the king of Assyria. Several cities are here named (Kg2 15:29) which were taken from him, all the land of Gilead on the other side Jordan, and Galilee in the north containing the tribes of Naphtali and Zebulon, were seized, and the inhabitants carried captive into Assyria. By this judgment God punished him for his attempt upon Judah and Jerusalem. It was then foretold that within two or three years after he made that attempt, before a child, then born, should be able to cry My father and my mother, the riches of Samaria should be taken away before the king of Assyria (Isa 8:4), and here we have the accomplishment of that prediction. (3.) Soon after this he forfeited his life to the resentments of his countrymen, who, it is probable, were disgusted at him for leaving them exposed to a foreign enemy, while he was invading Judah, of which Hoshea took advantage and, to gain his crown, seized his life, slew him, and reigned in his stead. Surely he was fond of a crown indeed who, at this time, would run such a hazard as a traitor did; for the crown of Israel, now that it had lost the choicest of its flowers and jewels, was lined more than ever with thorns, had of late been fatal to all the heads that had worn it, was forfeited to divine justice, and now ready to be laid in the dust - a crown which a wise man would not have taken up in the street, yet Hoshea not only ventured upon it but ventured for it, and it cost him dear.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 8–31. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 15:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.