Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And this thing became a sin: for the people went to worship before the one, even unto Dan.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And this thing H1697 became a sin H2403: for the people H5971 went H3212 to worship before H6440 the one H259, even unto Dan H1835.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
and the affair became a sin, for the people went to worship before the one [in Beit-El and] all the way to Dan [to worship the other].
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And this thing became a sin; the people walked as far as Dan to worship before one of the calves.
Ask
American Standard Version
And this thing became a sin; for the people went to worship before the one, even unto Dan.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
This thing became a sin; for the people went to worship before the one, even to Dan.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And this thing turned to sinne: for the people went (because of the one) euen to Dan.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and this thing becometh a sin, and the people go before the one--unto Dan.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon
City Plan: Jerusalem in the Time of Solomon View full PDF
Rehoboam, Jeroboam, and the Divided Kingdom
Rehoboam, Jeroboam, and the Divided Kingdom View full PDF
The Sins of Jeroboam
The Sins of Jeroboam View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,182 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Kings 12:30 marks a tragic and pivotal moment in the spiritual history of the newly formed Northern Kingdom of Israel, explicitly condemning King Jeroboam's establishment of the golden calf in Dan as a profound and pervasive sin. This act, driven by political expediency rather than divine command, led the people into blatant idolatry and apostasy, setting a destructive precedent that would plague Israel for generations, defining its spiritual trajectory and ultimately contributing to its downfall and exile.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the culmination and divine judgment on Jeroboam's strategic religious innovations, which began with his profound fear that the people of the Northern Kingdom, Israel, would return their allegiance to the house of David if they continued to worship at the divinely appointed Temple in Jerusalem, located in the Southern Kingdom of Judah. Jeroboam articulated this fear and his subsequent plan in 1 Kings 12:26-27. To counteract this perceived threat, Jeroboam declared it "too much" for the people to go to Jerusalem and proceeded to set up two golden calves in strategically significant locations: Bethel in the southern part of his territory and Dan in the far north, as detailed in 1 Kings 12:28-29. Verse 30 specifically highlights the worship at Dan, confirming that "this thing became a sin," a definitive divine judgment that applies equally to the calf at Bethel. This decision by Jeroboam serves as the foundational sin for the Northern Kingdom, a recurring and condemnatory theme throughout the books of Kings as subsequent monarchs either perpetuate or attempt to reform this initial act of idolatry.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The division of the united monarchy of Israel into two distinct kingdoms—Judah (south) and Israel (north)—occurred immediately after the reign of King Solomon, primarily due to Rehoboam's oppressive and unyielding policies, as chronicled in 1 Kings 12:1-19. Jeroboam, the first king of the Northern Kingdom, faced the immense challenge of consolidating his power, establishing legitimacy, and forging a distinct national identity separate from Jerusalem, which had been the traditional religious and political capital. His radical solution was to create alternative religious centers. The use of golden calves likely drew on ancient Near Eastern religious symbolism, where bull figures often represented strength, fertility, or served as a pedestal for a deity (like Baal or El). While Jeroboam may have intended these calves to represent Yahweh, the God of Israel, his actions directly violated the Second Commandment, which strictly forbids making any graven image to represent God or for worship (Exodus 20:4-5). Dan, located in the far north of Jeroboam's territory, was a significant strategic point, serving as a counter-balance to Bethel in the south, thereby effectively creating a complete alternative religious system that encompassed the entire Northern Kingdom's borders.
  • Key Themes: The most prominent theme in this passage is Idolatry and Apostasy, as Jeroboam's actions constitute a grave sin against the Lord. By creating golden calves and directing the people to worship them, he led Israel away from the exclusive worship of the one true God, thereby violating the foundational commandments of the Mosaic covenant, particularly the first two (Exodus 20:3-5). This act directly mirrored the infamous sin of the golden calf at Mount Sinai, highlighting a recurring pattern of Israel's unfaithfulness. Another crucial theme is Spiritual Compromise for Political Gain. Jeroboam's motivations were explicitly political: he feared his subjects would return their allegiance to the Davidic dynasty if they continued to worship in Jerusalem (1 Kings 12:26-27). This illustrates the profound danger of prioritizing worldly stability, power, or personal convenience over God's explicit commands, a compromise that inevitably leads to spiritual decay and national judgment. Finally, the verse underscores The Gravity of Sin and its Consequences. The explicit declaration "this thing became a sin" highlights the severe spiritual repercussions of Jeroboam's actions. This initial act of idolatry would become the defining sin of the Northern Kingdom, repeatedly mentioned as the reason for God's judgment and ultimately contributing to Israel's exile, as prophesied and fulfilled in 2 Kings 17:7-18.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Thing (Hebrew, dâbâr', H1697): From the root דָבַר, this word broadly refers to a "word," "matter," or "thing." In this context, "this thing" (הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה) refers specifically to Jeroboam's entire religious innovation—the making of the golden calves, the establishment of the new worship sites, and the appointment of non-Levitical priests. The use of "thing" here encapsulates the totality of his actions, indicating that the entire enterprise, not just a single component, was fundamentally flawed and offensive to God. It underscores the comprehensive nature of the transgression.
  • Sin (Hebrew, chaṭṭâʼâh', H2403): Derived from חָטָא, meaning "to miss the mark," this term denotes an "offence," "habitual sinfulness," or "guilt." When the text states "became a sin" (לְחַטָּאת), it signifies that Jeroboam's actions were not merely an error or a political misstep, but a profound and deliberate deviation from God's righteous standard and covenantal requirements. It implies a state of guilt and a pervasive spiritual corruption that would characterize the Northern Kingdom, incurring divine displeasure and judgment. This "sin" is a breach of the sacred relationship between God and His people, leading to spiritual alienation and the need for expiation.
  • Dan (Hebrew, Dân', H1835): From דִּין, meaning "judge," Dan was the northernmost city of Israel, famously marking the northern boundary of the land ("from Dan to Beersheba"). Its selection as a worship site, alongside Bethel in the south, was a deliberate strategic move by Jeroboam to encompass his entire kingdom within his new, illicit religious system, thereby preventing his subjects from traveling to Jerusalem. Tragically, Dan already had a history of illicit worship, having been the site where the tribe of Dan set up an idol for themselves during the period of the Judges (Judges 18:30-31). This pre-existing spiritual vulnerability made it a fertile ground for Jeroboam's idolatry, cementing its role as a place of apostasy.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And this thing became a sin:": This opening clause serves as a definitive and unequivocal divine judgment on Jeroboam's entire religious enterprise. The phrase "became a sin" (וַיְהִי הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה לְחַטָּאת, wayhi haddavar hazzeh l'ḥaṭṭa't) emphasizes that the establishment of the golden calves, the alternative worship sites, and the new priesthood was not merely a political maneuver or a minor transgression, but a fundamental and pervasive breach of God's law and covenant. It transformed the spiritual landscape of the Northern Kingdom into one defined by apostasy, incurring national guilt and divine judgment from its very inception.
  • "for the people went [to worship] before the one,": This clause provides the explicit reason why Jeroboam's "thing" was condemned as a sin. "The one" refers specifically to the golden calf that Jeroboam had set up in Dan (and implicitly, the one in Bethel). The people's active participation in traveling to these sites and engaging in worship "before" the idol signifies their complicity in the sin. It highlights that the idolatry was not confined to Jeroboam's decision but permeated the populace, who chose to follow their king's illicit religious innovations rather than God's clear commands for exclusive worship at the divinely chosen place in Jerusalem. Their voluntary participation made the sin a national transgression.
  • "[even] unto Dan.": This final phrase specifies one of the two primary locations where this idolatrous worship occurred, concretizing the sin. By naming Dan, the text underscores the widespread nature of the apostasy, extending to the very northern reaches of the kingdom, making it accessible to all. It establishes a tangible pattern of forbidden worship that would persist throughout the history of the Northern Kingdom, becoming a hallmark of its spiritual rebellion and a recurring indictment against its kings.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices that amplify its theological message. Foreshadowing is prominently featured, as Jeroboam's establishment of idolatry at Dan and Bethel sets the stage for the consistent spiritual rebellion, moral decay, and eventual destruction of the Northern Kingdom. This initial sin becomes a recurring motif and the primary reason cited for Israel's eventual exile, as vividly described in 2 Kings 17. There is also a strong element of Irony: Jeroboam's desperate attempt to secure his kingdom through religious innovation and political expediency ultimately ensures its spiritual decay and eventual collapse. He tries to prevent political fragmentation but causes profound spiritual fragmentation and invites divine judgment. The phrase "this thing became a sin" functions as a stark, definitive Judgment, emphasizing the absolute gravity of the transgression from God's perspective. Furthermore, the narrative employs Contrast by juxtaposing the illicit, human-devised worship at Dan and Bethel with the legitimate, divinely ordained worship at the Temple in Jerusalem, highlighting Israel's profound deviation from God's covenantal requirements and His revealed will.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The sin of Jeroboam, epitomized in 1 Kings 12:30, is a profound theological statement on the nature of idolatry as a fundamental betrayal of God's exclusive sovereignty and covenant. It demonstrates that idolatry is not merely worshipping other gods, but also worshipping the true God in a forbidden, human-devised, or syncretistic way. Jeroboam's actions underscore the profound danger of religious syncretism and human innovation supplanting divine command, illustrating how political expediency and fear can corrupt spiritual truth and lead an entire nation astray. This act of apostasy established a pattern of unfaithfulness that would define the Northern Kingdom, leading to consistent prophetic condemnation and ultimately, divine judgment and exile. It serves as a timeless warning against creating a religion that serves human comfort, political gain, or personal convenience rather than God's revealed will and His glory alone.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The historical account of Jeroboam's sin at Dan serves as a potent and enduring warning for all generations, revealing the insidious nature of idolatry and spiritual compromise. While modern idolatry may not involve literal golden calves, it manifests in placing anything—be it career, wealth, power, pleasure, self, political ideology, or even religious tradition—above God and His explicit commands. We are constantly tempted to create our own "gods" or to worship the true God in ways that are convenient, culturally acceptable, or politically advantageous, rather than in spirit and truth as He desires. This passage challenges us to examine our own lives and communities for any subtle forms of idolatry or compromises that might lead us away from exclusive devotion to God. True worship demands our whole heart, unreserved obedience to God's Word, and a steadfast refusal to allow worldly pressures or personal desires to dictate our spiritual practices. Our ultimate security, flourishing, and true identity are found not in human ingenuity, political maneuvering, or cultural accommodation, but in unwavering faithfulness to the Lord alone, who demands our complete and undivided allegiance.

Questions for Reflection

  • How do we identify "golden calves"—idols or substitutes for God—in our own lives or cultures today, and what forms do they take?
  • In what specific ways might political, social, or personal pressures tempt us to compromise our spiritual convictions or distort our worship of God?
  • What does it truly mean to worship God "in spirit and truth" (John 4:23-24) in contrast to the external, human-devised worship of Jeroboam?
  • How can we actively ensure our devotion remains solely to God, resisting subtle forms of idolatry and upholding biblical truth above human tradition or personal preference?

FAQ

Why was setting up golden calves considered a sin if Jeroboam claimed they represented the God who brought Israel out of Egypt?

Answer: Jeroboam's claim that the calves represented the God who brought Israel out of Egypt (1 Kings 12:28) did not negate the sinfulness of his actions. The primary reason it was a sin was its direct and flagrant violation of the Second Commandment, which explicitly forbids making any graven image or likeness of anything in heaven or on earth to worship or bow down to (Exodus 20:4-5). God is spirit and transcendent; He cannot be adequately represented by physical forms, and any attempt to do so diminishes His unique nature and opens the door to syncretism with pagan practices, such as the bull worship prevalent in Canaanite religion. Furthermore, it was a human innovation that directly replaced God's divinely ordained system of worship centered at the Temple in Jerusalem (Deuteronomy 12:5-14), thus undermining the covenant and God's revealed will concerning His presence and how He was to be approached.

What was the significance of Dan as a worship site, and why was it specifically mentioned?

Answer: Dan was significant for several reasons. Geographically, it was the northernmost city of Israel ("from Dan to Beersheba"), making it a strategically vital location to establish a religious center that could serve the entire northern population, effectively countering the enduring draw of Jerusalem in the south. By placing calves in both Dan and Bethel (in the south), Jeroboam created a complete and accessible alternative religious system within his kingdom's borders. Historically, Dan already had a dark spiritual past; the tribe of Dan had set up an idolatrous image there during the period of the Judges, as recorded in Judges 18:30-31. This pre-existing spiritual vulnerability made it a receptive site for Jeroboam's new idolatry, reinforcing a pattern of unfaithfulness. Its specific mention in 1 Kings 12:30 underscores the widespread nature of the apostasy and highlights how Jeroboam successfully decentralized worship from its legitimate, divinely appointed place, leading the entire kingdom into profound sin.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of Jeroboam's sin at Dan, where human innovation usurped divine command and led an entire nation into idolatry, profoundly illustrates humanity's inherent tendency to create its own paths to God rather than submitting to His revealed will. This pervasive spiritual rebellion, foundational to the Northern Kingdom's history, points to the desperate need for a perfect mediator and a new, true form of worship that transcends human constructs. Jesus Christ fulfills this need perfectly and completely. He is not merely a new location for worship, but the very embodiment of God's presence, the true Temple where God truly dwells and is met (John 2:19-21). Unlike the golden calves, which were false representations leading to sin and judgment, Jesus is the exact representation of God's being (Hebrews 1:3), the one through whom we truly know the Father and have access to Him. His coming inaugurates worship "in spirit and truth," transcending physical locations like Dan or Jerusalem, and human constructs like the calves, inviting a worship that is internal, authentic, and directed solely to God through Him (John 4:23-24). Furthermore, while Jeroboam's sin brought pervasive guilt upon Israel, Christ's ultimate sacrifice on the cross removes the stain of idolatry and all sin, making true communion with God possible and cleansing our consciences to serve the living God (Hebrews 9:11-14). He is the one who truly gathers God's people, not through political expediency or human-devised religion, but through spiritual transformation and His unifying power, ensuring that those who are not with Him are against Him, and those who do not gather with Him scatter (Matthew 12:30).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Kings 12 verses 25–33

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here the beginning of the reign of Jeroboam. He built Shechem first and then Penuel - beautified and fortified them, and probably had a palace in each of them for himself (Kg1 12:25), the former in Ephraim, the latter in Gad, on the other side Jordan. This might be proper; but he formed another project for the establishing of his kingdom which was fatal to the interests of religion in it.

I. That which he designed was by some effectual means to secure those to himself who had now chosen him for their king, and to prevent their return to the house of David, Kg1 12:26, Kg1 12:27. It seems, 1. He was jealous of the people, afraid that, some time or other, they would kill him and go again to Rehoboam. Many that have been advanced in one tumult have been hurled down in another. Jeroboam could not put any confidence in the affections of his people, though now they seemed extremely fond of him; for what is got by wrong and usurpation cannot be enjoyed nor kept with any security or satisfaction. 2. He was distrustful of the promise of God, could not take his word that, if he would keep close to his duty, God would build him a sure house (Kg1 11:38); but he would contrive ways and means, and sinful ones too, for his own safety. A practical disbelief of God's all-sufficiency is at the bottom of all our treacherous departures from him.

II. The way he took to do this was by keeping the people from going up to Jerusalem to worship. That was the place God had chosen, to put his name there. Solomon's temple was there, which God had, in the sight of all Israel, and in the memory of many now living, taken solemn possession of in a cloud of glory. At the altar there the priest of the Lord attended, there all Israel were to keep the feasts, and thither they were to bring their sacrifices. Now,

1.Jeroboam apprehended that, if the people continued to do this, they would in time return to the house of David, allured by the magnificence both of the court and of the temple. If they cleave to their old religion, they will go back to their old king. We may suppose, if he had treated with Rehoboam for the safe conduct of himself and his people to and from Jerusalem at the times appointed for their solemn feasts, it would not have been denied him; therefore he fears not their being driven back by force, but their going back voluntarily to Rehoboam.

2.He therefore dissuaded them from going up to Jerusalem, pretending to consult their ease: "It is too much for you to go so far to worship God, Kg1 12:28. It is a heavy yoke, and it is time to shake it off; you have gone long enough to Jerusalem" (so some read it); "the temple, now that you are used to it, does not appear so glorious and sacred as it did at first" (sensible glories wither by degrees in men's estimation); "you have greed yourselves from other burdens, free yourselves from this: why should we now be tied to one place any more than in Samuel's time?"

3.He provided for the assistance of their devotion at home. Upon consultation with some of his politicians, he came to this resolve, to set up two golden calves, as tokens or signs of the divine presence, and persuade the people that they might as well stay at home and offer sacrifice to those as go to Jerusalem to worship before the ark: and some are so charitable as to think they were made to represent the mercy-seat and the cherubim over the ark; but more probably he adopted the idolatry of the Egyptians, in whose land he had sojourned for some time and who worshipped their god Apis under the similitude of a bull or calf. (1.) He would not be at the charge of building a golden temple, as Solomon had done; two golden calves are the most that he can afford. (2.) He intended, no doubt, by these to represent, or rather make present, not any false god, as Moloch or Chemosh, but the true God only, the God of Israel, the God that brought them up out of the land of Egypt, as he declares, Kg1 12:28. So that it was no violation of the first commandment, but the second. And he chose thus to engage the people's devotion because he knew there were many among them so in love with images that for the sake of the calves they would willingly quit God's temple, where all images were forbidden. (3.) He set up two, by degrees to break people off from the belief of the unity of the godhead, which would pave the way to the polytheism of the Pagans. He set up these two at Dan and Beth-el (one the utmost border of his country northward), the other southward, as if they were the guardians and protectors of the kingdom. Beth-el lay close to Judah. He set up one there, to tempt those of Rehoboam's subjects over to him who were inclined to image-worship, in lieu of those of his subjects that would continue to go to Jerusalem. He set up the other at Dan, for the convenience of those that lay most remote, and because Micah's images had been set up there, and great veneration paid to them for many ages, Jdg 18:30, Jdg 18:31. Beth-el signifies the house of God, which gave some colour to the superstition; but the prophet called it Beth-aven, the house of vanity, or iniquity.

4.The people complied with him herein, and were fond enough of the novelty: They went to worship before the one, even unto Dan (Kg1 12:30), to that at Dan first because it was first set up, or even to that at Dan, though it lay such a great way off. Those that thought it much to go to Jerusalem, to worship God according to his institution, made no difficulty of going twice as far, to Dan, to worship him according to their own inventions. Or they are said to go to one of the calves at Dan because Abijah, king of Judah, within twenty years, recovered Beth-el (Ch2 13:19), and it is likely removed the golden calf, or forbade the use of it, and then they had only that at Dan to go to. This became a sin; and a great sin it was, against the express letter of the second commandment. God had sometimes dispensed with the law concerning worshipping in one place, but never allowed the worship of him by images. Hereby they justified their fathers in making the calf at Horeb, though God had so fully shown his displeasure against them for it and threatened to visit for it in the day of visitation (Exo 32:34), so that it was as great a contempt of God's wrath as it was of his law; and thus they added sin to sin. Bishop Patrick quotes a saying of the Jews, That till Jeroboam's time the Israelites sucked but one calf, but from that time they sucked two.

5.Having set up the gods, he fitted up accommodations for them; and wherein he varied from the divine appointment we are here told, which intimates that in other things he imitated what was done in Judah (Kg1 12:32) as well as he could. See how one error multiplied into many. (1.) He made a house of high-places, or of altars, one temple at Dan, we may suppose, and another at Beth-el (Kg1 12:31), and in each many altars, probably complaining of it as an inconvenience that in the temple at Jerusalem there was but one. The multiplying of altars passed with some for a piece of devotion, but God, by the prophet, puts another construction upon it, Hos 8:11. Ephraim has made many altars to sin. (2.) He made priests of the lowest of the people; and the lowest of the people were good enough to be priests to his calves, and too good. He made priests from the extremest parts of the people, that is, some out of every corner of the country, whom he ordered to reside among their neighbours, to instruct them in his appointments and reconcile them to them. Thus were they dispersed as the Levites, but were not of the sons of Levi. But the priests of the high-laces, or altars, he ordered to reside in Beth-el, as the priests at Jerusalem (Kg1 12:32), to attend the public service. (3.) The feast of tabernacles, which God had appointed on the fifteenth day of the seventh month, he adjourned to the fifteenth day of the eighth month (Kg1 12:32), the month which he devised of his own heart, to show his power in ecclesiastical matters, Kg1 12:33. The passover and pentecost he observed in their proper season, or did not observe them at all, or with little solemnity in comparison with this. (4.) He himself assuming a power to make priests, no marvel if he undertook to do the priests' work with his own hands: He offered upon the altar. This is twice mentioned (Kg1 12:32, Kg1 12:33), as also that he burnt incense. This was connived at in him because it was of a piece with the rest of his irregularities; but in king Uzziah it was immediately punished with the plague of leprosy. He did it himself, to make himself look great among the people and to get the reputation of a devout man, also to grace the solemnity of his new festival, with which, it is likely, at this time he joined the feast of the dedication of his altar. And thus, [1.] Jeroboam sinned himself, yet perhaps excused himself to the world and his own conscience with this, that he did not do so ill as Solomon did, who worshipped other gods. [2.] He made Israel to sin, drew them off from the worship of God and entailed idolatry upon their seed. And hereby they were punished for deserting the thrones of the house of David. The learned Mr. Whiston, in his chronology, for the adjusting of the annals of the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel, supposes that Jeroboam changed the calculation of the year and made it to contain but eleven months, and that by those years the reigns of the kings of Israel are measured till Jehu's revolution and no longer, so that during this interval eleven years of the annals of Judah answer to twelve in those of Israel.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 25–33. Public domain.
Copy as
Peter ChrysologusAD 450
SERMON 27
Now let us talk also about the second kind of scandal, which, we said, arises from human cleverness.… Jeroboam raised up a scandal. He set up as gods for the people, golden calves—pitiful images—to keep them from seeking the living God, the true temple, God’s law, the rightly appointed kings and their ancestral rites. Consequently, the whole people thus delivered over to error became a source of scandal like that given, according to the apostle, when a person eats, as harmless to his own conscience, the flesh of animals that were sacrificed to idols. He thinks that through such conduct he may well bring contempt on the inanimate stones and wooden gods that can neither sanctify nor profane anything. But what he thinks is an example of his faith becomes an occasion of error for uninstructed people, for it leads them not to contempt but to worship, and it causes the meal to appear to be a banquet of religious honor to those very inanimate gods that he is intentionally diminishing by this ridicule. Consequently, the apostle wisely concludes and explains, “And through your ‘knowledge’ the weak one will perish, the brother for whom Christ died.”
Ishodad of MervAD 850
BOOKS OF SESSIONS 1 KINGS 12:30
“The people went before the other [god] as far as Dan.” In order to worship the calf, the crowd walks in procession before it. Dan is the city that is now called Panias. When Israel took possession of the promised land, the children of Dan moved to take hold of that town and called it Dan. Two springs originated from there: Yor and Dan.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Kings 12:30 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.