Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Ahaz begat Jehoadah; and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Ahaz H271 begat H3205 Jehoadah H3085; and Jehoadah H3085 begat H3205 Alemeth H5964, and Azmaveth H5820, and Zimri H2174; and Zimri H2174 begat H3205 Moza H4162,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Achaz fathered Y'ho'adah; Y'ho'adah fathered 'Alemet, 'Azmavet and Zimri; Zimri fathered Motza;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Ahaz was the father of Jehoaddah, Jehoaddah was the father of Alemeth, Azmaveth, and Zimri, and Zimri was the father of Moza.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Ahaz begat Jehoaddah; and Jehoaddah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Ahaz became the father of Jehoaddah; and Jehoaddah became the father of Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri became the father of Moza.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Ahaz begate Iehoadah, and Iehoadah begate Alemeth, and Azmaueth, and Zimri, and Zimri begate Moza,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Ahaz begat Jehoadah, and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri; and Zimri begat Moza,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,612 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:36 meticulously continues a segment of the extensive genealogical record for the tribe of Benjamin, specifically detailing the lineage through Ahaz, Jehoadah, Alemeth, Azmaveth, Zimri, and Moza. This verse, embedded within the comprehensive family registers of 1 Chronicles, serves to underscore the ancient Israelite commitment to preserving tribal identity, land claims, and the continuity of covenant promises across successive generations, ultimately testifying to God's sovereign hand in the unfolding of human history and His faithfulness to His people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated within a lengthy and comprehensive section of genealogies that spans from 1 Chronicles 7 through 1 Chronicles 9. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 8 is dedicated entirely to the tribe of Benjamin. The preceding verses, 1 Chronicles 8:29-35, detail the lineage of King Saul, Israel's first monarch, through his son Jonathan. Verse 36 directly continues this specific branch of Saul's family tree, extending the line further through subsequent generations, demonstrating the meticulousness with which these records were maintained to ensure historical and tribal continuity, particularly for a tribe that had faced significant challenges and near extinction (Judges 20-21).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, genealogies were far more than mere lists of names; they were foundational documents for societal structure, legal claims, and religious identity. They established tribal affiliation, which determined land inheritance (as outlined in Numbers 26), validated rights to participate in cultic service (for priests and Levites, e.g., Ezra 2:62), and confirmed claims to leadership or royal succession. The post-exilic community, for whom Chronicles was primarily written, relied heavily on these records to re-establish their identity and reconstruct their society upon returning to the land. The preservation of the lineage of Benjamin, especially Saul's line, served as a historical anchor, connecting the present community to their foundational past and the earliest days of the monarchy, reinforcing their legitimate place within the restored nation.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous recording of genealogies, exemplified by 1 Chronicles 8:36, profoundly emphasizes God's faithfulness in preserving His people and His promises across generations. These lists highlight the continuity and endurance of the covenant community, demonstrating that even through periods of exile and dispersion, God's plan for Israel, including the eventual lineage of the Messiah, remained intact. They also underscore the importance of identity and heritage for the Israelites, providing a tangible link to their past, their tribal affiliations, and their place within God's redemptive narrative. The seemingly mundane nature of these lists paradoxically reveals God's sovereign providence, meticulously guiding the paths of individuals and families to fulfill His ultimate purposes, including the preservation of the royal line that would eventually lead to Christ, as foreshadowed in the Davidic Covenant of 2 Samuel 7:16.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Ahaz (Hebrew, ʼÂchâz', H271): From the root meaning "to possess," this name signifies "possessor" or "he has grasped." While a common name, its inclusion here, in the context of a lineage, subtly points to the concept of inheritance and possession, themes vital to the Israelite understanding of land and covenant promises. Each generation "possesses" the heritage passed down, both physically and spiritually.
  • begat (Hebrew, yâlad', H3205): This primitive root verb, meaning "to bear young" or "to beget," is the foundational term in all biblical genealogies. Its repeated use in this verse and throughout the Chronicles emphasizes direct paternal descent and the unbroken chain of generations. It signifies not merely biological reproduction but the legitimate and verifiable transfer of lineage, identity, and, implicitly, covenant blessings and responsibilities. The verb underscores the meticulous and verifiable nature of the historical record, establishing legitimate continuity essential for tribal identity and inheritance.
  • Jehoadah (Hebrew, Yᵉhôwʻaddâh', H3085): This name combines "Jehovah" (YHWH) with a root meaning "to adorn" or "to pass over," thus meaning "Jehovah-adorned" or "Jehovah has adorned." The presence of the divine name within a personal name is common in Israelite nomenclature and serves as a quiet theological statement. It suggests that even within these seemingly dry lists, God's presence and favor are acknowledged, indicating that these individuals and their lineage are part of His divine plan and under His benevolent oversight.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Ahaz begat Jehoadah;": This initial clause establishes the direct paternal link between Ahaz and Jehoadah, marking the continuation of this specific branch within the extensive Benjamite genealogy. It is a declarative statement of biological and legal succession, forming the foundational step in this particular segment of the lineage.
  • "and Jehoadah begat Alemeth, and Azmaveth, and Zimri;": This clause expands the lineage, indicating that Jehoadah fathered three sons: Alemeth, Azmaveth, and Zimri. The inclusion of multiple sons demonstrates the branching nature of family trees and the proliferation of descendants, while also highlighting the chronicler's intent to provide a comprehensive, though not exhaustive, record of this family unit.
  • "and Zimri begat Moza,": This final clause in the verse continues the specific line through one of Jehoadah's sons, Zimri, who then fathered Moza. This illustrates the selective nature of some genealogical entries, which often focus on the primary line relevant to the larger narrative or a particular tribal branch, even while acknowledging other siblings. It brings this specific segment of the genealogical record to a close within this verse, setting the stage for subsequent verses to continue other branches or further extend this one.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:36, and indeed throughout the genealogical sections of Chronicles, is Repetition. The consistent use of the verb "begat" (or its equivalent in English translation) creates a rhythmic, formulaic structure that emphasizes the unbroken chain of descent. This repetition serves to reinforce the meticulous nature of the record and the undeniable continuity of the family lines, underscoring the legal and historical validity of the lineage. Furthermore, the overall Structure of the genealogy itself functions as a literary device. By presenting these names in a linear, successive fashion, the text visually and narratively builds a bridge from the past to the present, conveying a profound sense of order, divine oversight, and historical progression, thereby underscoring the enduring nature of God's covenant with His people and His faithfulness in preserving their identity and heritage.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The seemingly dry list of names in 1 Chronicles 8:36 is deeply theological, serving as a testament to God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people. It demonstrates that divine promises are not abstract but are worked out through the real, tangible history of human families and generations. The preservation of these lineages, even obscure ones, underscores God's meticulous attention to detail and His sovereign control over history, ensuring that the necessary connections are maintained for His ultimate redemptive plan. This verse, like all genealogies, highlights the importance of historical continuity for understanding God's unfolding narrative and the identity of His chosen people, affirming that every life, no matter how briefly mentioned, plays a part in God's overarching design.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a list of names might not immediately stir the heart, 1 Chronicles 8:36 invites us to ponder the profound significance of continuity, heritage, and God's faithfulness across generations. It reminds us that our lives, too, are part of a larger story—a story of God's interaction with humanity that stretches back to creation and forward to eternity. Just as God meticulously preserved these ancient lines for His purposes, He remains faithful to us, ensuring His divine plans unfold over time. This verse encourages us to value our own heritage, both biological and spiritual, recognizing that we stand on the shoulders of those who came before us and are part of a continuous narrative of faith. It also teaches us that even the seemingly "mundane" or "dry" parts of Scripture hold profound purpose, contributing to the grand tapestry of redemption and revealing God's meticulous attention to every detail of human history. Our individual lives, though not recorded in Scripture, are known to God and contribute to His eternal purposes, reminding us that every person has a place in His grand design.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does understanding the purpose of biblical genealogies change your perspective on seemingly "boring" parts of Scripture?
  • In what ways does the meticulous preservation of lineages in the Bible speak to God's faithfulness and attention to detail in your own life and in the history of the church?
  • How can knowing your own family history or spiritual heritage deepen your understanding of your identity and place in God's ongoing story of redemption?

FAQ

Why does the Bible include such long and detailed genealogies, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: The inclusion of detailed genealogies, such as the one in 1 Chronicles 8, served several crucial purposes for ancient Israel. Firstly, they established and validated tribal identity and land claims, which were fundamental to Israelite society and the fulfillment of God's promises regarding the land (e.g., Numbers 26:52-56). Secondly, they confirmed rights to specific roles, particularly for priests and Levites, whose service in the temple was strictly hereditary (e.g., Ezra 2:61-63). Thirdly, and most significantly from a theological perspective, these genealogies meticulously preserved the lineage of the Messiah, demonstrating God's faithfulness in maintaining the promised seed through whom salvation would come (e.g., the Davidic line in 2 Samuel 7:12-16). For the post-exilic community, these records were vital for re-establishing their identity, reconstructing their society, and affirming their continuity with the covenant people of God, providing a tangible link to their past and their future hope.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 8:36 lists names from the tribe of Benjamin, not the direct lineage of Judah from which Christ descended, it powerfully contributes to the broader Christ-centered narrative by illustrating God's unwavering commitment to preserving specific lines for His redemptive purposes. The very existence of such meticulous genealogies across various tribes underscores the divine hand at work, ensuring that the promised seed would indeed come. Just as God faithfully preserved the lineage of Benjamin, He meticulously guarded the line of Judah, culminating in Jesus Christ. The New Testament genealogies in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 are the ultimate fulfillment of this Old Testament emphasis on lineage, demonstrating how God, through seemingly ordinary human history and countless individuals, brought forth the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. These ancient lists, therefore, are not merely historical records but profound testaments to God's sovereign plan of salvation, meticulously unfolding through the generations until the arrival of the Son of David, the Son of Abraham, who would redeem all humanity.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 33–40

It is observable that among all the genealogies of the tribes there is no mention of any of the kings of Israel after the defection from the house of David, much less of their families; not a word of Jeroboam's house or Baasha's, of Umri's or Jehu's; for they were all idolaters. But of the family of Saul, which was the royal family before the elevation of David, we have here a particular account. 1. Before Saul, Kish and Ner only are named, his father and grandfather, Ch1 8:33. His pedigree is carried higher Sa1 9:1, only there Kish is said to be the son of Abiel, here of Ner. He was in truth the son of Ner but the grandson of Abiel, as appears by Sa1 14:51, where it is said that Ner was the son of Abiel, and that Abner, who was the son of Ner, was Saul's uncle (that is, his father's brother); therefore his father was also the son of Ner. It is common in all languages to put sons for grandsons and other descendents, much more in the scanty language of the Hebrews. 2. After Saul, divers of his sons are named, but the posterity of none of them, save Jonathan only, who was blessed with numerous issue and those honoured with a place in the sacred genealogies for the sake of his sincere kindness to David. The line of Jonathan is drawn down here for about ten generations. Perhaps David was, in a particular manner, careful to preserve that, and assigned it a page by itself, because of the covenant made between his seed and Jonathan's seed forever, Sa1 20:15, Sa1 20:23, Sa1 20:42. This genealogy ends in Ulam, whose family became famous in the tribe of Benjamin for the number of its valiant men. Of that one man's posterity there were, as it should seem, at one time, 150 archers brought into the field of battle, that were mighty men of valour, Ch1 8:40. That is taken notice of concerning them which is more a man's praise than his pomp or wealth is, that they were qualified to serve their country.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 33–40. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:36 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.