Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Ishmerai also, and Jezliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal;
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Ishmerai H3461 also, and Jezliah H3152, and Jobab H3103, the sons H1121 of Elpaal H508;
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Yishm'rai, Yizli'ah and Yovav were the sons of Elpa'al.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Ishmerai, Izliah, and Jobab were the sons of Elpaal.
Ask
American Standard Version
and Ishmerai, and Izliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Ishmerai, and Izliah, and Jobab, the sons of Elpaal,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Ishmerai and Izliah, and Iobab, the sonnes of Elpaal,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Ishmerai, and Jezliah, and Jobab, sons of Elpaal;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,594 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 8:18 is a precise entry within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Benjamin, specifically identifying Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab as the sons of Elpaal. Far from being a mere enumeration, this verse, like others in the early chapters of 1 Chronicles, serves as a crucial component in establishing the identity, historical continuity, and theological grounding for the post-exilic community of Israel, underscoring God's meticulous faithfulness and the profound significance of every individual within His overarching divine plan.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within 1 Chronicles chapters 1-9, a monumental section almost entirely dedicated to comprehensive genealogies. The Chronicler, writing for the returned exiles in the post-Babylonian period, meticulously compiles these lists, tracing lineage from Adam and progressing through various tribal lines. Chapter 8 specifically focuses on the tribe of Benjamin, detailing its various families and their settlements, particularly those associated with King Saul. Verse 18, therefore, is a specific entry within a larger, highly structured record designed to re-establish the tribal and family identities of a people who had experienced significant displacement and disruption. It follows a consistent pattern of listing a father and then his sons, contributing to a comprehensive family tree for the Benjamite clan of Elpaal, linking individuals to their ancestral heritage.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The primary historical context for the compilation of Chronicles is the post-exilic period, roughly the late 5th to early 4th century BCE. After decades in Babylonian captivity, the returning exiles faced the daunting task of reconstructing their national and religious identity in the land of Israel. Genealogies were critically important in ancient Israelite society for several reasons: they validated claims to tribal land inheritances, confirmed eligibility for priestly or Levitical service (as seen in the challenges faced by those without clear lineage in Ezra 2:62 and Nehemiah 7:64), and established social and political standing. The detailed record of the Benjamite lineage, including seemingly minor figures like Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab, was essential for the re-establishment of a cohesive and properly ordered society, ensuring that the covenant promises related to land and people could be properly administered.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of 1 Chronicles 8:18, along with the broader genealogical sections, highlights several key theological and narrative themes central to the Chronicler's message. Foremost is God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. Despite exile and dispersion, God preserved a remnant and meticulously recorded their lineage, demonstrating His commitment to the promise made to Abraham to make his descendants a great nation (Genesis 12:2). Another significant theme is the importance and value of every individual within God's plan. Even names that appear only once, like those in this verse, are known and remembered by God, signifying that no one is insignificant in His grand narrative. This meticulous record-keeping also underscores God's orderly nature and the importance of structure and identity within His people, a message vital for a community seeking to rebuild after chaos and re-establish their connection to the past and their hope for the future.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Ishmerai (Hebrew, Yishmᵉray', H3461): From the root meaning "to keep" or "to guard," this name signifies "preservative." Its inclusion subtly points to the divine act of preservation, a theme central to the Chronicler's message about God's faithfulness in maintaining His people's lineage despite adversity.
  • Jezliah (Hebrew, Yizlîyʼâh', H3152): Derived from a root meaning "to draw up," this name means "he will draw out." While its specific historical context for this individual is unknown, the name itself evokes a sense of divine action, perhaps of deliverance or extraction, aligning with God's active role in the history of His people.
  • Jobab (Hebrew, Yôwbâb', H3103): From a root meaning "to howl," this name literally means "howler." While its precise connotation for this individual is not elaborated upon in the text, it functions as a distinct personal identifier within the family unit, demonstrating the diversity of names within Israelite society.
  • sons (Hebrew, bên', H1121): This term, meaning "a son," is used in its widest sense to denote a descendant who builds or continues the family name. In the context of genealogies, it emphasizes the generational continuity and the foundational role of offspring in preserving the lineage and identity of the family and tribe.
  • Elpaal (Hebrew, ʼElpaʻal', H508): This significant name, meaning "God (is) act" or "God has acted," serves as a profound theological statement. As the father of Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab, his name encapsulates a confession of faith, acknowledging God's active and sovereign involvement in the lives and history of His people, a message the Chronicler consistently reinforces.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Ishmerai also, and Jezliah, and Jobab,": This opening phrase introduces three distinct individuals, presented as a collective unit within the family structure. The use of "also" (Hebrew gam) seamlessly connects them to the preceding lineage of Elpaal, indicating their place as additional sons. Their inclusion, though brief, underscores the Chronicler's commitment to a comprehensive and accurate record, ensuring that every branch of the Benjamite family is accounted for. These are not merely abstract names but represent real people who contributed to the continuity of the covenant community.
  • "the sons of Elpaal;": This concise clause explicitly identifies the patriarchal lineage, stating that Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab belong to the household of Elpaal. In ancient Israelite society, identity was intrinsically tied to one's father and family line. This statement establishes their tribal affiliation (Benjamin, through Elpaal's lineage detailed earlier in the chapter) and their place within the broader social and religious fabric of Israel. The father's name, "Elpaal" ("God has acted"), subtly reinforces the overarching theological message of God's active hand in preserving and orchestrating the history of His people.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 8:18, and indeed throughout the opening chapters of Chronicles, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list but a purposeful literary construct designed to establish identity, prove lineage, and affirm historical continuity for the post-exilic community. The meticulous detail, even for seemingly minor figures, demonstrates the Chronicler's commitment to completeness and accuracy in recounting the divine preservation of Israel. There is also an element of Inclusion, where every individual, regardless of their historical prominence, is deemed worthy of mention, reflecting a profound theological conviction about the inherent value of each person in God's eyes and their role in His unfolding plan. The Repetition of the "son of" or "sons of" formula throughout the genealogies creates a rhythmic and reinforcing structure, emphasizing the unbroken chain of descent and the divine order governing the generations.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 8:18, within its broader genealogical context, profoundly speaks to God's meticulous care and unwavering faithfulness to His covenant people. It demonstrates that even in the most seemingly mundane details, God's hand is at work, preserving lineages and ensuring the continuity of His redemptive plan. The very existence of these names, long after the individuals lived, testifies to God's comprehensive knowledge and remembrance of every person within His covenant community. This attention to detail assures us that God's promises are not vague abstractions but are rooted in historical realities and specific individuals. The preservation of these family lines was critical for the re-establishment of Israel and, ultimately, for the unfolding of God's greater purposes, culminating in the promised Messiah.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In a world often obsessed with fame, visible accomplishment, and fleeting recognition, 1 Chronicles 8:18 offers a profound counter-cultural truth: every individual, regardless of their historical prominence or perceived significance, is known and valued by God. The inclusion of Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab in the sacred record reminds us that God's attention to detail extends to every life, every family, and every generation. This should bring immense comfort and encouragement, knowing that our lives, though seemingly ordinary, are intricately woven into the grand tapestry of God's redemptive history. It calls us to find our identity not in fleeting achievements or social status, but in our secure place within God's eternal family, recognizing that He remembers us, cherishes us, and has a specific purpose for us. Just as the ancient Israelites found their identity and hope in their meticulously preserved lineage, we too can find strength, direction, and profound peace by understanding our spiritual heritage and God's consistent faithfulness throughout history.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous record-keeping of God in passages like 1 Chronicles 8:18 affirm His character and faithfulness to you personally?
  • In what ways does knowing that God remembers even seemingly "insignificant" individuals encourage you in your own life and service?
  • How can understanding your spiritual heritage (as part of God's people) impact your sense of identity and purpose today?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so prevalent in the Old Testament, especially in Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies were crucial in ancient Israel for establishing identity, confirming land inheritance, and validating claims to priestly or royal office. For the post-exilic community, as seen in Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7, these lists were vital for re-establishing social order, ensuring proper temple service, and rebuilding the nation based on its covenant heritage. The Chronicler emphasizes them to show God's faithfulness in preserving a remnant and fulfilling His promises, even through generations of seemingly ordinary people, ultimately pointing towards the lineage from which the Messiah would come.

Do these names have any special meaning or significance?

Answer: While the text of 1 Chronicles 8:18 does not explicitly detail the meanings of "Ishmerai," "Jezliah," or "Jobab," Hebrew names often carried significant meaning, reflecting hopes, circumstances, or theological statements. For instance, "Ishmerai" means "preservative," "Jezliah" means "he will draw out," and the father's name, "Elpaal," means "God (is) act." The Chronicler's primary purpose in listing them is historical and genealogical, but the very act of preserving these individual names underscores the theological theme that every person is known and remembered by God, and that His divine action is evident throughout the generations.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous genealogies found in 1 Chronicles, including the seemingly obscure names of Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab, ultimately find their profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus. These ancient lists, painstakingly preserved, underscore God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, particularly the promise of a "seed" through whom all nations would be blessed (Galatians 3:16). The preservation of specific tribal lineages, especially Judah and Benjamin, was essential for the eventual arrival of the Messiah, who would come from the tribe of Judah (as prophesied in Genesis 49:10 and confirmed in Hebrews 7:14). The detailed genealogies of Jesus in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38 are the New Testament culmination of this Old Testament emphasis on lineage. They demonstrate that God's faithfulness, evident in remembering every individual like Ishmerai, Jezliah, and Jobab, ultimately led to the birth of the one through whom all of God's promises are "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20). Thus, these seemingly mundane lists point to the divine precision and providential care that ensured the perfect lineage for the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), establishing a new, spiritual lineage for all who believe.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 8 verses 1–32

There is little or nothing of history in all these verses; we have not therefore much to observe. 1. As to the difficulties that occur in this and the foregoing genealogies we need not perplex ourselves. I presume Ezra took them as he found them in the books of the kings of Israel and Judah (Ezr 9:1), according as they were given in by the several tribes, each observing what method they thought fit. Hence some ascend, others desecnd; some have numbers affixed, others places; some have historical remarks intermixed, others have not; some are shorter, others longer; some agree with other records, others differ; some, it is likely, were torn, erased, and blotted, others more legible. Those of Dan and Reuben were entirely lost. This holy man wrote as he was moved by the Holy Ghost; but there was no necessity for the making up of the defects, no, nor for the rectifying of the mistakes, of these genealogies by inspiration. It was sufficient that he copied them out as they came into his hand, or so much of them as was requisite to the present purpose, which was the directing of the returned captives to settle as nearly as they could with those of their own family, and in the places of their former residence. We may suppose that many things in these genealogies which to us seem intricate, abrupt, and perplexed, were plain and easy to them then (who knew how to fill up the deficiencies) and abundantly answered the intention of the publishing of them. 2. Many great and mighty nations there were now in being upon earth, and many illustrious men in them, whose names are buried in perpetual oblivion, while the names of multitudes of the Israel of God are here carefully preserved in everlasting remembrance. They are Jasher, Jeshurun - just ones, and the memory of the just is blessed. Many of these we have reason to fear, came short of everlasting honour (for even the wicked kings of Judah come into the genealogy), yet the perpetuating of their names here was a figure of the writing of the names of all God's spiritual Israel in the Lamb's book of life. 3. This tribe of Benjamin was once brought to a very low ebb, in the time of the judges, upon the occasion of the iniquity of Gibeah, when only 600 men escaped the sword of justice; and yet, in these genealogies, it makes as good a figure as almost any of the tribes: for it is the honour of God to help the weakest and raise up those that are most diminished and abased. 4. Here is mention of one Ehud (Ch1 8:6), in the preceding verse of one Gera (Ch1 8:5) and (Ch1 8:8) of one that descended from him, that begat children in the country of Moab, which inclines me to think it was that Ehud who was the second of the judges of Israel; for he is said to be the son of Gera and a Benjamite (Jdg 3:15), and he delivered Israel from the oppression of the Moabites by killing the king of Moab, which might give him a greater sway in the country of Moab than we find evidence of in his history and might occasion some of his posterity to settle there. 5. Here is mention of some of the Benjamites that drove away the inhabitants of Gath (Ch1 8:13), perhaps those that had slain the Ephraimites (Ch1 7:21) or their posterity, by way of reprisal: and one of those that did this piece of justice was named Beriah too, that name in which the memorial of that injury was preserved. 6. Particular notice is taken of those that dwelt in Jerusalem (Ch1 8:28 and again Ch1 8:32), that those whose ancestors had had their residence there might thereby be induced, at their return from captivity, to settle there too, which, for aught that appears, few were willing to do, because it was the post of danger: and therefore we find (Neh 11:2) the people blessed those that willingly offered themselves to dwell at Jerusalem, the greater part being inclined to prefer the cities of Judah. Those whose godly parents had their conversation in the new Jerusalem should thereby be engaged to set their faces thitherward and pursue the way thither, whatever it cost them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–32. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 8:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.