Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Meshobab, and Jamlech, and Joshah the son of Amaziah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Meshobab H4877, and Jamlech H3230, and Joshah H3144 the son H1121 of Amaziah H558,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Meshovav, Yamlekh, Yoshah the son of Amatzyah,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Meshobab, Jamlech, Joshah son of Amaziah,
Ask
American Standard Version
And Meshobab, and Jamlech, and Joshah the son of Amaziah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Meshobab, and Jamlech, and Joshah the son of Amaziah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Meshobab, and Iamlech, and Ioshah the sonne of Amashiah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
even Meshobab, and Jamlech, and Joshah son of Amaziah,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,420 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:34 is a succinct verse embedded within the extensive genealogical records of the tribe of Simeon, meticulously detailing three individuals: Meshobab, Jamlech, and Joshah, identified as the son of Amaziah. Far from being a mere list, this verse underscores the divine meticulousness in preserving the lineage of God's covenant people, highlighting the individual value of each person within the grand tapestry of redemptive history and affirming the faithfulness of God to His promises through generations.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: The book of 1 Chronicles opens with a sweeping series of genealogies, spanning the first nine chapters, tracing the lineage from Adam through the patriarchs, the twelve tribes of Israel, and various prominent families. Chapter 4 specifically focuses on the descendants of Judah and Simeon. Verses 1 Chronicles 4:24-43 are dedicated to the tribe of Simeon, detailing their family heads, territories, and later migrations, including their expansion into new lands. This particular verse, 1 Chronicles 4:34, contributes to this meticulous record-keeping, ensuring the tribal structure and individual identities are preserved before the narrative shifts to the reign of King David and the history of the united and divided monarchies. The inclusion of such detailed lists emphasizes the Chronicler's concern for legitimate lineage and continuity, particularly for the post-exilic community.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was primarily written for the post-exilic community returning to Judah, likely in the late 5th or early 4th century BC. For these returning exiles, the genealogies served a crucial function: re-establishing their identity, validating land claims, confirming priestly and Levitical duties, and connecting them back to their heritage and God's covenant with their ancestors. In ancient Israelite society, lineage was paramount for inheritance, social status, and religious participation. Knowing one's tribal affiliation was essential for understanding one's place within the covenant community and for demonstrating the fulfillment of God's promises regarding the land and the coming Messiah. The meticulous nature of these lists reflects a society deeply rooted in its past and dependent on its historical records for its future, providing a tangible link to God's historical faithfulness.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of seemingly obscure names like those in 1 Chronicles 4:34 contributes to several overarching themes in Chronicles. First, it highlights Divine Meticulousness and Remembrance, emphasizing that God's plan encompasses every individual, no matter how seemingly minor, and that He remembers His covenant people. Second, it underscores the Preservation of Lineage and Covenant Faithfulness, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His promises, particularly those concerning the land and the future Davidic king. These genealogies are not merely historical records but theological statements about God's faithfulness to His word, ensuring the continuity of His people and the unfolding of His redemptive plan, a theme echoed in Genesis 12:1-3. Finally, they serve as a Foundation for Identity and Hope for the returning exiles, reminding them of their heritage and the enduring nature of God's covenant, even after periods of judgment and displacement, offering assurance of God's continued presence and purpose for His people, as seen in the restoration narrative of Ezra 2.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Meshobab (Hebrew, mᵉshōwḇâḇ', H4877): This name is derived from the Hebrew root שׁוּב (shuv), meaning "to turn back," "to return," or "to restore." Thus, Meshobab can be interpreted as "returned" or "restored." In the context of the post-exilic community for whom Chronicles was written, names with such meanings could carry a subtle resonance of hope and restoration for the nation, hinting at divine intervention in their history.
  • Jamlech (Hebrew, yamlēḵ', H3230): Derived from the root מָלַךְ (malakh), meaning "to reign" or "to be king." Jamlech therefore means "he will make king" or "he shall reign." While not explicitly tied to a royal line in this specific context, the presence of such a name within a genealogy subtly points to the broader theme of kingship and governance within Israel's history and future, anticipating the Davidic monarchy.
  • Joshah (Hebrew, yōwšāh', H3144): This name is a theophoric name, meaning it incorporates a divine element. It combines יה (Yah), a shortened form of Yahweh, with ישע (yasha), meaning "to save" or "to deliver." Thus, Joshah means "Yahweh is salvation" or "Yahweh saves." This name powerfully encapsulates a core theological truth about God's character and His redemptive work, a truth that permeates the entire biblical narrative and foreshadows the ultimate deliverer.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Meshobab,": This phrase introduces the first individual in this specific enumeration of Simeon's descendants. The name "Meshobab" signifies "returned" or "restored," subtly hinting at themes of divine turning or restoration, which would have been significant for the post-exilic audience of Chronicles, who were themselves experiencing a form of national return.
  • "and Jamlech,": The second individual listed, "Jamlech," carries the meaning "he shall reign" or "he will make king." Its inclusion emphasizes the diverse nature of names within Israelite genealogies, some of which bear kingly or authoritative connotations, reflecting the various roles and hopes within the tribal structures and pointing to God's sovereign hand in establishing leaders.
  • "and Joshah the son of Amaziah,": This final part of the verse names Joshah and identifies his father, Amaziah. "Joshah" means "Yahweh is salvation," a profound theological statement embedded in a personal name, declaring God's saving nature. The patronymic "the son of Amaziah" (meaning "Yahweh is strong") provides further specificity, grounding these individuals within their immediate family units and demonstrating the meticulous record-keeping that was vital for tribal identity, continuity, and the accurate tracing of lineages.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:34 and the surrounding chapters is Genealogy, which functions as a foundational structuring principle for the entire book. Unlike narrative prose, a genealogy's purpose is not to tell a story but to establish lineage, identity, and historical continuity, serving as a theological statement about God's faithfulness to His covenant promises. Within this genealogical framework, there is an implicit use of Repetition (of names, "son of" phrases) across the broader lists, which reinforces the meticulousness of the record and the systematic nature of the Chronicler's work. Furthermore, Onomastics, the study of proper names and their meanings, is highly significant here. As seen in the Key Word Analysis, the names Meshobab ("returned"), Jamlech ("he shall reign"), and Joshah ("Yahweh is salvation") are not arbitrary sounds but carry theological weight and subtle prophetic or thematic undertones, even for individuals whose specific life stories are not recounted. The very act of listing these names also serves as a form of Inclusivity, demonstrating that every individual, regardless of their historical prominence, is known and remembered within God's comprehensive and sovereign plan.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The seemingly simple listing of names in 1 Chronicles 4:34 profoundly underscores God's meticulous care for every individual within His covenant people and His unwavering faithfulness to His promises. These genealogies are not merely historical archives; they are theological affirmations that God remembers His people, preserves their identity, and orchestrates their history to fulfill His redemptive purposes. For the post-exilic community, these lists re-established their connection to the past, reminding them that they were part of a continuous story of God's faithfulness, even after the trauma of exile. They served as a tangible link to the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, particularly concerning the land and the future Messiah, demonstrating that God's plan is unfolding precisely as He purposed.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While a verse like 1 Chronicles 4:34 might initially appear dry or insignificant, its inclusion in the inspired Word of God speaks volumes about divine intentionality and the intrinsic value of every life. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of meticulous detail, who knows each of us by name and values our individual place within His grand narrative of redemption. For us today, this verse invites us to consider our own place in God's story, recognizing that our lives, though seemingly small in the vast expanse of history, are known, purposed, and remembered by Him. It encourages us to appreciate the spiritual heritage passed down through generations of faithful believers and to understand that our faith is built upon a historical foundation of God's unwavering faithfulness. Just as the returning exiles found their identity and hope in these ancient lists, we too can find assurance in God's enduring commitment to His people and His plan, trusting that His purposes will prevail through every generation.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous nature of biblical genealogies, even those with seemingly obscure names, challenge our perception of what God considers important and worthy of remembrance?
  • In what ways does the inclusion of individuals like Meshobab, Jamlech, and Joshah affirm the value of every person in God's eyes, regardless of their historical prominence or lack thereof?
  • How can understanding the purpose of these ancient genealogies deepen our appreciation for our own spiritual heritage and the continuity of God's work through history?
  • What does God's faithfulness in preserving these lineages teach us about His commitment to His promises in our own lives and in the broader sweep of redemptive history?

FAQ

Why are these long lists of names included in the Bible, especially in books like 1 Chronicles?

Answer: These extensive genealogies, including 1 Chronicles 4:34, serve several critical purposes. For the ancient Israelites, especially the post-exilic community, they were vital for establishing tribal identity, validating land claims, confirming priestly and Levitical roles, and ensuring proper inheritance rights. Theologically, they demonstrate God's meticulous attention to detail, His faithfulness in preserving His covenant people, and the continuity of His redemptive plan. They show how God worked through specific families and individuals to bring about His promises, ultimately leading to the lineage of the Messiah. They are not just historical records but profound theological statements about God's unwavering commitment to His word and His people.

Do the meanings of the names in genealogies matter?

Answer: Yes, often they do. While not every name's meaning is explicitly highlighted in the text, many Hebrew names carry significant theological or historical connotations. For instance, in 1 Chronicles 4:34, names like "Meshobab" ("returned"), "Jamlech" ("he shall reign"), and "Joshah" ("Yahweh is salvation") are not random. They can subtly reflect themes present in the biblical narrative, foreshadow future events, or encapsulate core truths about God's character and actions. Their inclusion can add layers of meaning and provide a deeper understanding of the divine hand guiding history, even when the individuals themselves are not prominent figures in the narrative.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The seemingly mundane listing of names in 1 Chronicles 4:34, like all biblical genealogies, ultimately finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. The meticulous preservation of these lineages across centuries underscores God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, particularly the promise of a seed who would crush the serpent's head (Genesis 3:15). The entire purpose of these detailed records, from Adam through the patriarchs and the tribes of Israel, was to trace the specific line through which the Messiah would come. Jesus's own genealogies, as presented in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38, validate His claim as the promised Son of David and the Son of God, fulfilling the hopes and expectations embedded within these ancient lists. The names themselves, like Joshah ("Yahweh is salvation"), resonate with the very essence of Christ's mission: to bring salvation. He is the ultimate "return" and "restoration" for humanity, and He is the King who "shall reign" forever, establishing an eternal kingdom that transcends all earthly lineages (Revelation 11:15). Thus, even in the most obscure names, we glimpse the meticulous divine hand guiding history towards its glorious culmination in Christ, the one in whom all God's promises find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 24–43

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe, Ch1 4:38. Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not like the children of Judah, Ch1 4:27. Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others that are more increased. Here observe, 1. The cities allotted them (Ch1 4:28), of which see Jos 19:1, etc. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of David (Ch1 4:31) intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere. 2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts. (1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed Ham (Ch1 4:40), made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory of Hezekiah's pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered, so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures, and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation. (2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their country, Ch1 4:42, Ch1 4:43. Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that he should be divided and scattered (Gen 49:7): yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon, which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are said to dwell there unto this day (Ch1 4:43), by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity. Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for preservation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:34 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.