Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Joel, and Jehu the son of Josibiah, the son of Seraiah, the son of Asiel,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Joel H3100, and Jehu H3058 the son H1121 of Josibiah H3143, the son H1121 of Seraiah H8304, the son H1121 of Asiel H6221,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Yo'el, Yehu the son of Yoshivyah the son of S'rayah the son of 'Asi'el,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Joel, Jehu son of Joshibiah (son of Seraiah, son of Asiel),
Ask
American Standard Version
and Joel, and Jehu the son of Joshibiah, the son of Seraiah, the son of Asiel,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and Joel, and Jehu the son of Joshibiah, the son of Seraiah, the son of Asiel,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Ioel and Iehu the sonne of Ioshibiah, the sonne of Seraiah, the sonne of Asiel,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Joel, and Jehu son of Josibiah, son of Seraiah, son of Asiel,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,421 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:35 presents a concise yet profoundly significant genealogical entry within the tribe of Simeon, meticulously tracing a specific lineage: Joel, Jehu, Josibiah, Seraiah, and Asiel. This verse, embedded within the extensive ancestral records that commence the book of 1 Chronicles, serves to underscore the paramount importance of lineage for the post-exilic Israelite community, facilitating the re-establishment of tribal identities, validating ancestral land claims, and firmly anchoring the repatriated people within the enduring covenant history of God's chosen nation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 4:35 is situated within the expansive genealogical records that dominate the initial nine chapters of 1 Chronicles, a section meticulously detailing the tribal origins and family lines of Israel. Specifically, this verse is part of the detailed account of the descendants of Simeon, spanning from 1 Chronicles 4:24 to 1 Chronicles 4:43. The immediate preceding and succeeding verses continue this precise enumeration of family heads, their settlements, and their historical movements, providing a continuous, unbroken thread of tribal identity and historical presence. The Chronicler's deliberate inclusion of such comprehensive lineages serves as a foundational element for the subsequent historical narratives of the united and divided monarchies, grounding the later accounts of Israel's kings and priests in the divine promise and the continuity of God's covenant people.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely compiled in the post-exilic period, possibly by Ezra or a contemporary scribe, for the community returning from Babylonian captivity. For these repatriated Israelites, the meticulous genealogical records were far from mere historical curiosities; they were vital documents for the spiritual, social, and political reconstruction of their nation. These lists were crucial for re-establishing tribal identities, validating claims to ancestral land allotments (as mandated by the Mosaic Law, for example, in Numbers 26:52-56), and ensuring the purity and legitimacy of priestly and Levitical lines. The tribe of Simeon, whose inheritance was historically interwoven with the larger territory of Judah (as detailed in Joshua 19:1-9), often faced challenges to its distinct identity, making the preservation of its lineage particularly significant for its continued recognition and place within the restored community.
  • Key Themes: This seemingly straightforward list of names contributes significantly to several overarching themes pervasive in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it profoundly underscores the importance of lineage and identity in ancient Israel, where one's place in the community, access to inherited land, and role in religious worship were intrinsically determined by tribal and family affiliation. Secondly, it highlights God's unwavering faithfulness in preservation, demonstrating His meticulous attention to His covenant people, even through periods of national dispersion, foreign domination, and apparent decline. The very existence and compilation of these records after the exile powerfully testifies to His sovereign hand in maintaining the continuity of Israel's story. Finally, these genealogies reinforce the theme of historical continuity and divine purpose, connecting the post-exilic community directly to the patriarchs and the foundational promises made to Israel, thereby reaffirming their enduring place within God's unfolding redemptive plan for humanity.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Joel (Hebrew, Yôwʼêl', H3068): (Jehovah) and H410 (God); meaning "Jehovah is his God." This theophoric name, common in the Old Testament and borne by various individuals including a prophet, serves as a profound theological statement. Its presence in this lineage reflects a foundational Israelite confession of faith, emphasizing the exclusive sovereignty and divine nature of Yahweh as the personal God of His people.
  • Jehu (Hebrew, Yêhûwʼ', H3068): (Jehovah) and H1931 (He); meaning "Jehovah (is) He." Like Joel, this name is a powerful theophoric declaration, incorporating the divine name Yahweh. It signifies an affirmation of God's active existence, sovereign presence, and personal involvement in the lives of His people. While the most famous Jehu was a king of Israel, this individual is distinct, underscoring the commonality and significance of such faith-filled naming conventions.
  • Asiel (Hebrew, ʻĂsîyʼêl', H6213): (made) and H410 (God); meaning "made of God." This name points to God as the ultimate creator, shaper, and sustainer of all existence, acknowledging divine agency in human life and destiny. Its inclusion in this genealogical line subtly reinforces the theological worldview deeply embedded within Israelite naming practices, where names often served as miniature confessions of faith or declarations about God's character.
  • son (Hebrew, bên', H1129): (to build); meaning "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense." This foundational Hebrew term is crucial in genealogical texts, establishing direct paternal lineage and, by extension, tribal identity and inheritance. Its repeated use here underscores the meticulous nature of the record, linking individuals across generations and emphasizing the continuity of the family line, which was paramount for societal structure and covenantal understanding in ancient Israel.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Joel,": This clause introduces the first individual in this specific segment of the Simeonite genealogy. Joel is presented as a significant figure, likely a head of a household or a prominent family leader within the tribe, whose lineage is deemed important enough for explicit mention by the Chronicler.
  • "and Jehu the son of Josibiah,": Here, a second individual, Jehu, is introduced, immediately followed by the standard genealogical marker "the son of," which identifies his direct father, Josibiah. This construction establishes a clear paternal lineage, tracing the family line back another generation and reinforcing the meticulous nature of the record.
  • "the son of Seraiah,": This phrase extends the lineage further, clarifying that Josibiah is the son of Seraiah. The repeated "the son of" (implied for Joel as well, or as a head of a household) is characteristic of biblical genealogies, ensuring precise identification and connection between generations.
  • "the son of Asiel,": The final phrase in this verse extends the lineage one more generation backward, identifying Seraiah as the son of Asiel. This four-generational sequence (Asiel -> Seraiah -> Josibiah -> Jehu) provides a specific, detailed snapshot of a family line within the tribe of Simeon, demonstrating the Chronicler's commitment to preserving the intricate details of Israel's tribal heritage.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:35, and indeed throughout the initial chapters of the book, is Genealogy. This systematic listing of ancestors and descendants serves not merely as a historical record but as a profound theological statement, establishing identity, continuity, and covenantal connection for the post-exilic community. The frequent Repetition of phrases like "the son of" (or implied filial connections) is characteristic of genealogical lists, providing clarity, emphasizing the directness of lineage, and reinforcing the meticulous nature of the record. Furthermore, the verse functions as part of an extended List, a common biblical literary form used to organize information, whether it be laws, names, or events. In this context, the list of names, though seemingly dry, is imbued with profound significance, asserting the enduring presence and identity of God's people through generations and affirming God's faithfulness to His covenant promises.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While 1 Chronicles 4:35 might appear as a mere list of names, it carries significant theological weight. It affirms God's meticulous knowledge and intimate care for every individual within His covenant people, regardless of their historical prominence or recorded deeds. The preservation of such detailed genealogies, even for seemingly obscure figures, testifies to God's unwavering faithfulness in maintaining His promises and sustaining the identity of Israel through countless generations, even through periods of national crisis and dispersion. It underscores the profound biblical principle that every life has intrinsic value and a divinely ordained place within God's overarching redemptive plan, even if their specific accomplishments are not explicitly recorded. This divine attention to detail provides immense comfort and assurance, reminding us that God knows each of His children intimately and orchestrates their place in His grand narrative of salvation history.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly mundane nature of a genealogical list like 1 Chronicles 4:35 offers a profound spiritual lesson for contemporary believers. It reminds us that God's redemptive plan is not an abstract concept but is deeply personal and intimately woven through the lives of countless individuals across generations. Just as Joel, Jehu, Josibiah, Seraiah, and Asiel were known and accounted for in their time, so too are we known by God with an unfathomable depth of understanding. Our lives, with their unique stories, challenges, and contributions, are not insignificant but are integral threads in the rich tapestry of God's unfolding purpose. This verse encourages us to embrace our own spiritual heritage, recognizing that we stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before us in faith, and that our lives contribute to the ongoing story of God's kingdom. It invites us to live with the profound awareness that our names, too, are precious in His sight, and that we are called to live faithfully within the lineage of faith handed down to us, impacting the generations to come for His glory.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous record-keeping in biblical genealogies, like this one, deepen your understanding of God's character and His infinite attention to detail?
  • In what ways does knowing that God values every individual, even those not highlighted for grand deeds, impact your sense of self-worth, purpose, and significance in His kingdom?
  • How can we, in our own lives, actively honor our spiritual heritage and intentionally contribute to the ongoing story of faith for future generations, ensuring the legacy of Christ continues?

FAQ

Why are genealogies so prevalent and important in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: Genealogies are crucial in 1 Chronicles because the book was primarily written for the post-exilic community returning from Babylonian captivity. These extensive lists served several vital functions for a people seeking to rebuild their identity and nation. They re-established tribal identities and validated ancestral land claims after the dislocation of the exile, confirmed the legitimacy of the priesthood and Levitical service for proper worship, and provided a powerful sense of historical continuity, connecting the returning exiles to their rich heritage and God's enduring covenant promises. By meticulously tracing these lines, particularly the lineage of David (as seen in 1 Chronicles 3), the Chronicler reminded the people of their roots and their integral place in God's ongoing redemptive plan, fostering hope for the future.

Do these genealogies have any relevance for Christians today?

Answer: Absolutely. While Christians do not track physical lineage in the same way ancient Israel did, these genealogies illustrate several timeless and profound theological truths directly applicable to believers today. They powerfully demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving His people and His promises across countless generations, even through periods of immense hardship. They highlight that every individual, even those seemingly obscure to human history, is known, valued, and accounted for by God. For Christians, our "lineage" is primarily spiritual, connecting us to Abraham through faith in Christ (as clearly explained in Galatians 3:7). Ultimately, these meticulous lists underscore the precise and sovereign way God prepared the historical and biological lineage for the coming of Jesus Christ, the Messiah, who is the ultimate fulfillment of all promises and the culmination of all genealogies.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:35 appears as a simple list of names from the tribe of Simeon, its ultimate significance, like all Old Testament genealogies, finds its profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. These meticulous records underscore God's sovereign and detailed plan to preserve a chosen lineage through which His redemptive purposes would ultimately unfold. Every name, every "son of," every generation meticulously recorded, ultimately points to the unwavering faithfulness of God in maintaining the line that would eventually lead to the Messiah. Jesus himself is the culmination of all genealogies, tracing His earthly lineage through both Judah and David, as comprehensively recorded in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38. He is the true "Son of David" and the "Son of Abraham," embodying and fulfilling the covenant promises made to both. Furthermore, the emphasis on names being recorded in these ancient lists foreshadows the ultimate "Book of Life" in which the names of those redeemed by Christ are eternally inscribed, as powerfully depicted in Revelation 20:12 and Revelation 21:27. Thus, even a seemingly minor verse like 1 Chronicles 4:35 whispers of God's unwavering commitment to His covenant, culminating in the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world and establishes a new spiritual lineage of believers, whose names are forever etched in the annals of heaven.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 24–43

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe, Ch1 4:38. Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not like the children of Judah, Ch1 4:27. Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others that are more increased. Here observe, 1. The cities allotted them (Ch1 4:28), of which see Jos 19:1, etc. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of David (Ch1 4:31) intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere. 2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts. (1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed Ham (Ch1 4:40), made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory of Hezekiah's pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered, so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures, and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation. (2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their country, Ch1 4:42, Ch1 4:43. Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that he should be divided and scattered (Gen 49:7): yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon, which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are said to dwell there unto this day (Ch1 4:43), by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity. Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for preservation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:35 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.