Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they dwelt at Beersheba, and Moladah, and Hazarshual,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they dwelt H3427 at Beersheba H884, and Moladah H4137, and Hazarshual H2705,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They lived at Be'er-Sheva, Moladah, Hatzar-Shu'al,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
They lived in Beersheba, Moladah, Hazar-shual,
Ask
American Standard Version
And they dwelt at Beer-sheba, and Moladah, and Hazar-shual,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They lived at Beersheba, and Moladah, and Hazarshual,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And they dwelt at Beer-sheba, and at Moladah, and at Hazar Shual,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they dwell in Beer-Sheba, and Moladah, and Hazar-Shaul,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 10,414 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:28 serves as a vital geographical anchor within the extensive genealogies of the book, precisely detailing the dwelling places—Beersheba, Moladah, and Hazarshual—for a segment of the tribe of Simeon. This seemingly straightforward verse is crucial for establishing the historical and geographical reality of Simeon's settlement within the southern reaches of the Promised Land, thereby affirming God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His covenant promises to Israel, even amidst the unique and challenging circumstances of Simeon's inheritance.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within the foundational genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9), which meticulously lay the groundwork for the Chronicler's broader narrative. Specifically, 1 Chronicles 4 focuses on the lineages of Judah and Simeon. Unlike most tribes that received a distinct, contiguous land parcel, the tribe of Simeon's inheritance was uniquely allocated "within" the larger territory of Judah, primarily in the arid southern Negev region, as explicitly stated in Joshua 19:1-9. The Chronicler's meticulous listing of towns such as Beersheba, Moladah, and Hazarshual in this verse, alongside other Simeonite settlements in the surrounding passages (1 Chronicles 4:28-33), serves a critical purpose: to confirm the historical reality of their settlement and the faithful fulfillment of God's division of the land among the tribes following the conquest under Joshua. This detailed record underscores the Chronicler's overarching emphasis on continuity, legitimacy, and divine faithfulness for the post-exilic community, providing a tangible link to their ancestral heritage.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical setting for the settlement of Simeon, as described here, dates back to the period of the Israelite conquest and early settlement of Canaan, vividly detailed in the book of Joshua. Culturally, the precise enumeration of towns reflects the significant transition of the Israelite tribes from a nomadic or semi-nomadic existence to a more settled, agrarian, and urbanized society within the Promised Land. Beersheba, in particular, was an exceptionally significant city, often serving as the symbolic southern boundary of Israel ("from Dan to Beersheba") and holding profound patriarchal significance as a crucial site for Abraham and Isaac. The unique circumstance of Simeon's inheritance being "within" Judah's territory (Joshua 19:1) highlights a historical reality: Simeon was a smaller, less powerful tribe that, over time, likely became largely absorbed into its larger, more dominant neighbor. For the Chronicler's post-exilic audience, these specific geographical details would have resonated deeply, reaffirming their ancient claims to the land, validating their historical identity, and providing a sense of continuity with their divinely appointed heritage.
  • Key Themes: The inclusion of these specific towns in 1 Chronicles 4:28 contributes significantly to several major theological and narrative themes woven throughout 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully underscores Divine Providence and Fulfillment, demonstrating God's meticulous faithfulness in providing for His people, even for Simeon, a tribe whose future was prophetically described by Jacob as being "scattered in Israel" (Genesis 49:7). Their dwelling within Judah's borders, though a form of scattering, simultaneously reflects God's provision and their continued presence in the land. Secondly, these genealogies and geographical lists reinforce Identity and Heritage. For the post-exilic community, to whom 1 Chronicles was primarily addressed, these meticulous records were not merely historical curiosities but vital affirmations of their tribal identity, their enduring connection to the land, and their rightful place within God's covenant promises, offering a crucial sense of continuity and hope despite their recent displacement and exile. Thirdly, the detailed nature of these lists serves as a Historical Record, providing an administrative and geographical account of the Israelite presence and control over various regions of the Promised Land, thereby validating their ancient claim to the territory.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • dwelt (Hebrew, yashab', H3427): H3427 - This primitive root signifies "to sit down" but, by strong implication, means "to dwell," "to remain," or "to settle." In 1 Chronicles 4:28, its use indicates an established, settled presence of the Simeonite descendants, suggesting a permanent habitation rather than a temporary encampment. This verb choice underscores the fulfillment of the promise of land and the establishment of a fixed community.
  • Beersheba (Hebrew, Be'er Sheba', H884): H884 - Meaning "well of an oath" or "well of seven," Beersheba was a highly significant biblical city located in the southern Negev. It is frequently mentioned in the patriarchal narratives as a place where Abraham and Isaac made covenants and dug wells. Its inclusion here grounds the Simeonite settlement in a location rich with covenantal history and patriarchal significance, connecting their dwelling to the foundational narratives of Israel.
  • Hazarshual (Hebrew, Chatsar Shu'al', H2705): H2705 - Translating to "village of (the) fox" or "courtyard of the fox," Hazarshual was another town located in the southern territory of Judah, specifically allocated to Simeon. While seemingly a mundane name, such toponyms often reflected local characteristics, wildlife, or geographical features. Its inclusion, alongside other specific locations, emphasizes the Chronicler's meticulous attention to detail in documenting the full extent and precise locations of Simeonite settlement, adding to the historical veracity of the account.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they dwelt at Beersheba, and Moladah, and Hazarshual,": This clause precisely identifies three key towns where the descendants of Simeon resided. The verb "dwelt" (וַיֵּשְׁבוּ, vayyeishvu) signifies a settled, established presence, contrasting with a nomadic or transient existence. The listing of these particular towns—Beersheba, Moladah, and Hazarshual—all located in the southern Negev, precisely delineates the geographical extent of Simeon's inheritance within Judah's larger territory. This detailed geographical information is crucial for the Chronicler's overarching purpose of affirming the historical reality and divine allocation of land to all the tribes of Israel, even those whose identities might have become less distinct over time. It underscores the enduring nature of God's promises and the historical continuity of His people's presence in the land, providing a concrete foundation for the post-exilic community's identity and claim.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 4:28, and indeed throughout the extensive genealogical sections of Chronicles, is Cataloging or Listing. This meticulous enumeration of names and places serves several critical functions. It provides a comprehensive historical record, validating the lineage and geographical claims of the Israelite tribes with undeniable specificity. This detailed Toponymy (the study of place names) grounds the abstract concept of tribal inheritance in concrete, identifiable locations, making the historical narrative tangible and verifiable. The sheer volume of names and places also conveys a sense of Completeness and Authority, suggesting that the Chronicler's account is exhaustive, reliable, and divinely ordained. While seemingly dry to a modern reader, this detailed listing is a deliberate rhetorical choice, designed to affirm the identity and heritage of the post-exilic community by connecting them directly to their ancestral roots and the divinely ordained distribution of the Promised Land, thereby inspiring confidence and legitimacy in their re-establishment.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The specific mention of Beersheba, Moladah, and Hazarshual as dwelling places for the Simeonites in 1 Chronicles 4:28 is far more than a mere geographical notation; it carries profound theological weight. It stands as a powerful testament to God's meticulous faithfulness in fulfilling His promises, even to a tribe whose destiny was fraught with challenges and a prophecy of scattering. Despite Jacob's pronouncement, Simeon was indeed provided for and given a specific, albeit integrated, inheritance within the Promised Land. This detail underscores the Chronicler's overarching message that God's covenant with Israel endures through generations, providing a steadfast sense of continuity and hope for the post-exilic community who were rebuilding their identity and nation. The very existence of these settled places affirms God's providential care and His unwavering commitment to His people's historical and geographical rootedness, demonstrating that His plans are precise and His promises are true.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly mundane list of towns in 1 Chronicles 4:28 offers profound insights into the very character of God and our place within His grand, unfolding narrative. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of meticulous detail, unwavering faithfulness, and sovereign provision. Just as He meticulously recorded the dwelling places of Simeon, ensuring their inheritance despite their unique circumstances and Jacob's prophecy of scattering, so too does He care for every detail of our lives, even those we might consider insignificant. This verse encourages us to cultivate a deep trust in God's providential care, even when our personal circumstances seem less than ideal, our path appears uncertain, or our identity feels fragmented. It teaches us that our ultimate identity and belonging are not solely determined by our physical location, our family lineage, or our earthly achievements, but by our secure place within God's eternal covenant family. The Chronicler's emphasis on historical continuity and divine promise provides a powerful reminder that our present experiences are deeply rooted in God's past faithfulness and are purposefully moving towards His glorious future designs. We are called to recognize and deeply appreciate the historical foundations of our faith, understanding that God works through specific people, in specific places, and at specific times to accomplish His divine will, and that we are privileged participants in this ongoing, redemptive story.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's faithfulness to Simeon, despite Jacob's prophecy of scattering, encourage you in your own life when circumstances seem challenging or uncertain?
  • In what specific ways do you recognize God's meticulous care for details reflected in your own personal journey or in the broader story of redemption?
  • How can understanding the historical and geographical roots of our faith deepen our appreciation for God's enduring covenant with His people and His unwavering commitment to His promises?

FAQ

Why are these seemingly mundane lists of names so important in the book of Chronicles?

Answer: These lists are far from mundane; they are foundational to the Chronicler's overarching theological and historical purpose. For the post-exilic community returning to Judah, these genealogies and geographical records served several crucial functions. Firstly, they provided a historical and theological anchor, meticulously tracing their lineage back to the patriarchs and affirming their rightful, divinely allocated claim to the Promised Land. Secondly, they powerfully reinforced identity and continuity, reminding a displaced and rebuilding people of their unbroken connection to God's covenant promises and their enduring place within the broader, sacred story of Israel. They validated their tribal heritage and their legitimate right to rebuild the temple and the nation. Thirdly, the specific mention of towns like Beersheba, Moladah, and Hazarshual served as a legal and administrative record, demonstrating the historical reality of Israelite settlement and control over the land, thereby providing a concrete basis for their re-establishment and future claims. This meticulous detail underscored God's faithfulness in fulfilling His promises through specific people in specific places, providing immense encouragement and legitimacy to a community seeking to re-establish itself. For example, the mention of Beersheba connects the Simeonite settlement directly to the patriarchal history of Abraham and Isaac, reinforcing the ancient roots and divine sanction of their claim.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:28 meticulously details the physical dwelling places of Simeon's descendants in the earthly Promised Land, it subtly points forward to the ultimate fulfillment of God's promises in Christ, who provides a spiritual dwelling and an eternal inheritance far surpassing any earthly territory. The meticulous record of tribal lands in Chronicles, signifying a place of belonging and security, foreshadows the comprehensive inclusion of all believers—both Jew and Gentile—into God's spiritual family, the church, which is the true "household of God" (Ephesians 2:19). Just as Simeon found its allotted place within Judah's territory, believers are now spiritually "in Christ," finding their true identity, security, and belonging not in a physical location but in an unbreakable spiritual union with the Messiah. The Old Testament concept of an "inheritance," intricately tied to land and lineage, finds its ultimate and glorious reality in the "inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven" for all those who are born again through the resurrection of Jesus Christ (1 Peter 1:3-4). Christ Himself is the ultimate "place" of rest, security, and eternal habitation, the one in whom all God's promises find their resounding "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20), providing a spiritual dwelling place and eternal citizenship in the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God (Hebrews 12:22).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 24–43

We have here some of the genealogies of the tribe of Simeon (though it was not a tribe of great note), especially the princes of that tribe, Ch1 4:38. Of this tribe it is said that they increased greatly, but not like the children of Judah, Ch1 4:27. Those whom God increases ought to be thankful, though they see others that are more increased. Here observe, 1. The cities allotted them (Ch1 4:28), of which see Jos 19:1, etc. When it is said that they were theirs unto the reign of David (Ch1 4:31) intimation is given that when the ten tribes revolted from the house of David many of the Simeonites quitted these cities, because they lay within Judah, and seated themselves elsewhere. 2. The ground they got elsewhere. When those of this tribe that revolted from the house of David were carried captive with the rest into Assyria those that adhered to Judah were remarkably owned of God and prospered in their endeavours to enlarge their coasts. It was in the days of Hezekiah that a generation of Simeonites, whose tribe had long crouched and truckled, was animated to make these bold efforts. (1.) Some of them attacked a place in Arabia, as it should seem, called the entrance of Gedor, inhabited by the posterity of accursed Ham (Ch1 4:40), made themselves masters of it, and dwelt there. This adds to the glory of Hezekiah's pious reign, that, as his kingdom in general prospered, so did particular families. It is said that they found fat pastures, and yet the land was quiet; even when the kings of Assyria were giving disturbance to all their neighbours this land escaped their alarms. The inhabitants being shepherds, who molested none, were not themselves molested, till the Simeonites came and drove them out and succeeded them, not only in the plenty, but in the peace, of their land. Those who dwell (as we do) in a fruitful country, and whose land is wide, and quiet, and peaceable, have reason to own themselves indebted to that God who appoints the bounds of our habitation. (2.) Others of them, to the number of 500, under the command of four brethren here named, made a descent upon Mount Seir, and smote the remainder of the devoted Amalekites, and took possession of their country, Ch1 4:42, Ch1 4:43. Now the curses on Ham and Amalek had a further accomplishment, when they seemed dormant, if not dead; as had also the curse on Simeon, that he should be divided and scattered (Gen 49:7): yet to him it was turned into a blessing, for the families of Simeon, which thus transplanted themselves into those distant countries, are said to dwell there unto this day (Ch1 4:43), by which it should seem they escaped the calamities of the captivity. Providence sometimes sends those out of trouble that are designed for preservation.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 24–43. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.