Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Ezra were, Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon: and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Ezra H5834 were, Jether H3500, and Mered H4778, and Epher H6081, and Jalon H3210: and she bare H2029 Miriam H4813, and Shammai H8060, and Ishbah H3431 the father H1 of Eshtemoa H851.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of 'Ezrah: Yeter, Mered, 'Efer and Yalon. These are the sons of Bityah the daughter of Pharaoh, whom Mered took as his wife: she conceived Miryam, Shamai and Yishbach the father of Esht'moa; while his Jewish wife bore Yered the father of G'dor, Hever the father of Sokho and Y'kuti'el the father of Zanoach.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Ezrah: Jether, Mered, Epher, and Jalon.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Ezrah: Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon; and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Ezrah: Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon; and she bore Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Ezrah were Iether and Mered, and Epher, and Ialon, and he begate Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Ezra are Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon: and she beareth Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah father of Eshtemoa.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 4:17 meticulously records a segment of the extensive genealogies of the tribe of Judah, detailing the sons of Ezra—Jether, Mered, Epher, and Jalon—and subsequently mentioning Miriam, Shammai, and Ishbah, with Ishbah specifically identified as the progenitor of Eshtemoa. This verse, embedded within the Chronicler's comprehensive historical account, underscores the profound importance of lineage for establishing identity, securing inheritance rights, and ensuring the continuity of God's covenant promises to Israel, thereby highlighting the divine attention to detail in the preservation of His people's heritage.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 4:17 is situated within the extensive genealogical records that comprise the first nine chapters of 1 Chronicles. Following a universal genealogy tracing humanity from Adam through Noah and his sons, as found in 1 Chronicles 1:1-23, the Chronicler systematically narrows the focus to the descendants of Abraham, then Jacob, and finally concentrates on the twelve tribes of Israel. Chapter 4 specifically delves into the intricate lineages of Judah, the royal tribe, detailing various clans, families, and individuals, including those associated with specific towns or trades. This verse, therefore, serves as a precise entry within this meticulous record, contributing to the overall aim of establishing the legitimate identity and historical continuity of the post-exilic community by linking them to their pre-exilic ancestors and the covenant promises. It is part of a larger literary strategy to affirm the continuity of God's people and His faithfulness to His covenants.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was most likely composed after the Babylonian exile, during the Persian period (c. 450-400 BCE). For the returning Jewish community, establishing identity, land rights, and eligibility for priestly or Levitical service was paramount. Genealogies served as vital legal documents, verifying claims to ancestral lands in Judah and ensuring the purity and legitimacy of priestly and Levitical lines. The detailed nature of these records reflects a society deeply concerned with heritage, the re-establishment of their national identity, and the fulfillment of God's promises, particularly those related to the land and the Davidic covenant. The mention of specific individuals and their descendants, such as Ishbah being the "father of Eshtemoa," also highlights the importance of geographical connections and the establishment of settlements within the tribal territories, reinforcing the community's re-establishment in the promised land.
  • Key Themes: This verse, like the broader genealogical sections, contributes to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it profoundly emphasizes the importance of lineage and heritage as foundational to Israel's identity and covenantal status. The meticulous record-keeping demonstrates God's faithfulness in preserving a remnant and maintaining His promises across generations, even through periods of national upheaval like the exile. Secondly, it highlights God's sovereign attention to detail and His profound care for individual families within His grand redemptive plan. Even seemingly obscure names are recorded, underscoring that every person has a place in God's story. This attention to detail foreshadows the ultimate fulfillment of the covenant promises, particularly the Davidic covenant which guaranteed an enduring dynasty, ultimately pointing towards the Messiah. The genealogies also reinforce the theme of continuity and restoration, bridging the gap between the past glory of Israel and the hopeful future of the returning exiles, as seen in the call for a census in Numbers 1 to organize the tribes.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • sons (Hebrew, bên, H1121): Meaning "a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or condition, etc., (like father or brother), etc.)." This term is fundamental to genealogies, emphasizing the continuation of the family line and the patriarchal structure through which tribal identity and inheritance were passed down.
  • bare (Hebrew, hârâh, H2029): Meaning "to be (or become) pregnant, conceive (literally or figuratively); been, be with child, conceive, progenitor." This verb highlights the act of conception and birth, underscoring the vital role of the mother in the continuation of the lineage, even when the focus of the genealogy is primarily on the male line.
  • father (Hebrew, ʼâb, H1): Meaning "a primitive word; father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application; chief, (fore-) father(-less), [idiom] patrimony, principal." In this context, it specifically denotes Ishbah's role as the direct progenitor of Eshtemoa, establishing a clear line of descent and connecting the individual to a significant place.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Ezra [were], Jether, and Mered, and Epher, and Jalon": This initial clause introduces the direct male descendants of a man named Ezra. It establishes a clear line of succession and family identity within the tribe of Judah, emphasizing the patriarchal structure inherent in biblical genealogies. The listing of names serves to meticulously record the family tree, ensuring the accurate preservation of lineage for future generations.
  • "and she bare Miriam, and Shammai, and Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa": This phrase shifts focus to the children born by an unnamed "she," likely one of Ezra's wives, or perhaps Mered's wife, given the context of the preceding verse (1 Chronicles 4:18). The inclusion of Miriam, a female, is noteworthy in a list primarily concerned with male lineage, suggesting her particular significance or the importance of her descendants. Shammai is another son mentioned. Ishbah is highlighted not just as a son, but specifically as the "father of Eshtemoa," indicating that his lineage was associated with the founding or prominence of the town of Eshtemoa, a significant detail for territorial and historical identification within the tribal allotments.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in 1 Chronicles 4:17, and indeed throughout the genealogical sections of 1 Chronicles, is Cataloging or List-Making. This meticulous enumeration of names and familial relationships serves a crucial historical and theological purpose, establishing legitimacy, continuity, and the precise fulfillment of tribal allocations. The device of Patronymic Designation is also prominently evident, where individuals are identified by their father ("sons of Ezra," "Ishbah the father of Eshtemoa"), reinforcing the patriarchal structure and the importance of male lineage for tracing tribal and land rights. The brief mention of Miriam, a female, amidst a predominantly male list, could be seen as a subtle form of Highlighting by Exception, drawing attention to her presence and potentially her significant role or the importance of her descendants within this family branch, as female names are less common in these extensive lists.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

1 Chronicles 4:17, though seemingly a mere list of names, contributes profoundly to the biblical narrative by affirming God's meticulous care for His people and His unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. The preservation of these detailed lineages underscores the divine commitment to maintain a chosen people through whom His redemptive plan would unfold. It teaches us that every individual, even those briefly mentioned, plays a part in God's overarching story, and that God's sovereignty extends to the seemingly mundane details of family history. This attention to lineage also serves to validate the claims of the returning exiles to their ancestral lands and their place within the covenant community, demonstrating God's restorative work and His enduring covenant love.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

In an age often characterized by a sense of anonymity and detachment, 1 Chronicles 4:17 offers a profound reminder of the value God places on every individual and every family. This seemingly dry list of names reveals a God who is intimately involved in the details of human history, meticulously recording the lineage of His people. It encourages us to recognize our own place within God's grand narrative, understanding that our lives, though perhaps not recorded in Scripture, are known and valued by Him. Just as these ancient families contributed to the unfolding of God's plan, so too do our lives and our faithfulness contribute to His ongoing work in the world. It prompts us to appreciate our own heritage, both familial and spiritual, and to consider how our lives connect to the generations that preceded us and those that will follow. This verse invites us to consider the legacy we are building, not just for our immediate families, but for the broader community of faith, knowing that our faithfulness echoes through generations.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous recording of genealogies in Scripture challenge our modern tendency to overlook or devalue the "ordinary" details of life?
  • In what ways does understanding our own family or spiritual heritage contribute to our sense of identity and purpose in God's story?
  • What does God's attention to seemingly minor details in these genealogies reveal about His character and His profound care for humanity?

FAQ

Why are there so many genealogies in 1 Chronicles, and what is their significance?

Answer: The extensive genealogies in 1 Chronicles (chapters 1-9) serve several crucial purposes for the post-exilic community. Firstly, they establish identity and legitimacy, allowing the returning exiles to verify their tribal affiliations, land rights, and eligibility for priestly or Levitical service. This was vital for rebuilding society and the temple. Secondly, they provide historical continuity, linking the current generation back to Adam, Abraham, and the patriarchs, reinforcing their place in God's covenant history and demonstrating that God's plan for His people remained unbroken. Thirdly, they underscore God's faithfulness in preserving His people and His promises, particularly the Davidic line, despite the exile. The meticulous record-keeping demonstrates that God's plan was unfolding precisely as He intended, even through periods of hardship, ensuring the continuation of His chosen people and the eventual arrival of the Messiah, as foreshadowed in passages like Genesis 49:10.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 4:17 is a specific genealogical entry, its deeper significance, like all Old Testament genealogies, ultimately points to the coming of the Messiah. The meticulous preservation of the lineage of Judah, the tribe from which kings would come, foreshadows the ultimate King, Jesus Christ. The very act of recording these names, ensuring continuity and identity, highlights God's unwavering commitment to His covenant promises, particularly the promise of a descendant of David who would reign forever, as detailed in 2 Samuel 7:12-16. Jesus' own genealogies in the New Testament, found in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38, directly connect Him to these ancient lines, demonstrating His rightful claim as the promised King and the fulfillment of all Old Testament hopes. Thus, even a seemingly obscure verse like 1 Chronicles 4:17 contributes to the grand narrative of God's redemptive plan, culminating in the person and work of Jesus, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, and the Son of David, through whom all God's promises find their "Yes" and "Amen" (2 Corinthians 1:20).

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 4 verses 11–23

We may observe in these verses, 1. That here is a whole family of craftsmen, handicraft tradesmen, that applied themselves to all sorts of manufactures, in which they were ingenious and industrious above their neighbours, Ch1 4:14. There was a valley where they lived which was, from them, called the valley of craftsmen. Those that are craftsmen are not therefore to be looked upon as mean men. These craftsmen, though two of a trade often disagree, yet chose to live together, for the improving of arts by comparing notes, and that they might support one another's reputation. 2. That one of these married the daughter of Pharaoh (Ch1 4:18), which was the common name of the kings of Egypt. If an Israelite in Egypt before the bondage began, while Joseph's merits were yet fresh in mind, was preferred to be the king's son-in-law, it is not to be thought strange: few Israelites could, like Moses, refuse an alliance with the court. 3. That another is said to be the father of the house of those that wrought fine linen, Ch1 4:21. It is inserted in their genealogy as their honour that they were the best weavers in the kingdom, and they brought up their children, from one generation to another, to the same business, not aiming to make them gentlemen. This Laadah is said to be the father of those that wrought fine linen, as before the flood Jubal is said to be the father of musicians and Jabal of shepherds, etc. His posterity inhabited the city of Mareshah, the manufacture or staple commodity of which place was linen-cloth, with which their kings and priests were clothed. 4. That another family had had dominion in Moab, but were now in servitude in Babylon, Ch1 4:22, Ch1 4:23. (1.) It was found among the ancient things that they had the dominion in Moab. Probably in David's time, when that country was conquered, they transplanted themselves thither, and were put in places of power there, which they held for several generations; but this was a great while ago, time out of mind. (2.) Their posterity were now potters and gardeners, as is supposed in Babylon, where they dwelt with the king for his work, got a good livelihood by their industry, and therefore cared not for returning with their brethren to their own land, after the years of captivity had expired. Those that now have dominion know not what their posterity may be reduced to, nor what mean employments they may be glad to take up with. But those were unworthy the name of Israelites that would dwell among plants and hedges rather than be at the pains to return to Canaan.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 11–23. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 4:17 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.