Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Pedaiah were, Zerubbabel, and Shimei: and the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Pedaiah H6305 were, Zerubbabel H2216, and Shimei H8096: and the sons H1121 of Zerubbabel H2216; Meshullam H4918, and Hananiah H2608, and Shelomith H8019 their sister H269:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of P'dayah: Z'rubavel and Shim'i. The children of Z'rubavel: Meshulam, Hananyah and Shlomit their sister;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The sons of Pedaiah: Zerubbabel and Shimei. The children of Zerubbabel:
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Pedaiah: Zerubbabel, and Shimei. And the sons of Zerubbabel: Meshullam, and Hananiah; and Shelomith was their sister;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Pedaiah: Zerubbabel, and Shimei. The sons of Zerubbabel: Meshullam, and Hananiah; and Shelomith was their sister;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Pedaiah were Zerubbabel, and Shimei: and the sonnes of Zerubbabel were Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Pedaiah: Zerubbabel, and Shimei. And sons of Zerubbabel: Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

1 Chronicles 3:19 meticulously records a vital segment of the Davidic royal lineage, specifically detailing the sons of Pedaiah, including the pivotal figure of Zerubbabel, and then enumerating Zerubbabel's own children: Meshullam, Hananiah, and their sister Shelomith. This concise verse serves as a crucial genealogical link, affirming the continuity of the promised Davidic dynasty through the challenging period of the Babylonian exile and the subsequent return, highlighting God's faithfulness in preserving the royal line from which the Messiah would ultimately descend.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: 1 Chronicles 3:19 is situated within the extensive genealogical records that dominate the opening chapters of 1 Chronicles, specifically within the lineage of David (chapters 3-9). Chapter 3 meticulously traces the descendants of King David, beginning with his sons born in Hebron and Jerusalem, through the Solomonic line, and continuing into the period of the Babylonian exile. Verses 17-18 list the sons of King Jeconiah (Jehoiachin), the last reigning king of Judah before the exile, and then introduce Shealtiel and Pedaiah. Verse 19 then presents Zerubbabel as the son of Pedaiah, directly connecting the post-exilic leader to the royal Davidic line that endured through the national catastrophe. This precise placement underscores the Chronicler's primary concern: to demonstrate the unbroken continuity of God's covenant promises to David, even amidst apparent national collapse.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of 1 Chronicles was likely compiled in the post-exilic period, possibly in the late 5th or early 4th century BCE, for the returning Jewish community in Judah. For this community, establishing identity, land claims, and the legitimacy of religious and political leadership was paramount. Genealogies were not mere historical curiosities; they were legal and theological documents. They affirmed tribal affiliations, validated priestly and Levitical roles, and, most critically for the Davidic line, provided assurance that God's covenant promises remained intact despite the destruction of the temple and the monarchy. Zerubbabel, mentioned here, was a key figure during this time, serving as governor of Judah under Persian rule and leading the rebuilding of the Second Temple, a monumental task detailed in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. His inclusion in this royal genealogy solidified his authority and his connection to Israel's divinely ordained past.
  • Key Themes: This verse, and the broader genealogical section, contributes significantly to several overarching themes in 1 Chronicles. Firstly, it powerfully asserts the Continuity of the Davidic Covenant. Despite the exile and the apparent end of the monarchy, God's promise to David of an eternal dynasty (as seen in 2 Samuel 7:16) is shown to persist through Zerubbabel. His presence in this lineage is a tangible sign that God's faithfulness ensures beyond human failure. Secondly, it highlights the theme of Post-Exilic Restoration. Zerubbabel's leadership was instrumental in the physical and spiritual rebuilding of Judah, particularly the reconstruction of the Temple (Haggai 1:14). His inclusion here acts as a beacon of hope, reminding the returning exiles that God was actively working to restore His people. Finally, the meticulous preservation of this lineage implicitly points to the Messianic Hope. For the Chronicler's audience, the unbroken Davidic line was a testament to God's ultimate plan to send the promised Messiah, a descendant of David, who would fully establish His eternal kingdom.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Pedaiah (Hebrew, Pᵉdâyâh', H6305): This name, meaning "Jah has ransomed," carries significant theological weight, especially in the post-exilic context. While the precise genealogical relationship of Pedaiah to Zerubbabel is debated among scholars (with some texts identifying Zerubbabel as Shealtiel's son), the name itself subtly points to God's redemptive work. It suggests the divine act of "ransoming" or "delivering" His people from the Babylonian exile, a theme central to the hope of the returning community.
  • Zerubbabel (Hebrew, Zᵉrubbâbel', H2216): Meaning "descended of (i.e. from) Babylon" or "born there," this name directly links the prominent leader to the place of Israel's captivity. Despite being born in exile, Zerubbabel became the divinely appointed governor who led the first wave of returnees and spearheaded the rebuilding of the Second Temple. His name encapsulates the paradox of God's faithfulness: even amidst judgment and displacement, God preserved a "seed" of hope and leadership for His people, demonstrating His enduring commitment to His covenant.
  • Shelomith (Hebrew, Shᵉlômîyth', H8019): This name, meaning "peaceableness," is noteworthy for its inclusion of Zerubbabel's daughter in a typically patriarchal genealogy. While not unprecedented, the specific mention of a daughter can indicate her prominence, perhaps due to her marriage, her influence, or simply to complete the family record. Her name itself, "peaceableness," resonates with the profound longing for shalom, or comprehensive peace and well-being, that characterized the post-exilic community striving for restoration.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Pedaiah [were], Zerubbabel, and Shimei": This opening clause establishes the immediate lineage, explicitly naming Zerubbabel as a son of Pedaiah. This is a crucial detail given that other biblical texts (e.g., Ezra 3:2) refer to Zerubbabel as the son of Shealtiel, who is listed as Pedaiah's brother in 1 Chronicles 3:17-18. The Chronicler's presentation here may reflect a specific genealogical tradition, a levirate marriage, or a legal adoption, but its primary intent is to firmly place Zerubbabel within the legitimate Davidic succession, ensuring his authority as a leader of the post-exilic community is rooted in his royal heritage. Shimei is listed as his brother, though less is known about him.
  • "and the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister": This second clause continues the direct line of Zerubbabel, listing his immediate offspring. The inclusion of Meshullam and Hananiah ensures the continuation of the male line, which was crucial for the perpetuation of the Davidic dynasty and the ongoing hope for the Messiah. The specific mention of "Shelomith their sister" is notable in a typically patrilineal genealogy. While the exact reason for her inclusion is not explicitly stated, it may signify her importance within the family or community, perhaps through marriage or influence, or simply to provide a complete and accurate record of Zerubbabel's direct descendants.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 3:19, as in much of the opening chapters of the book, is Genealogy. This is not merely a dry list of names but a highly purposeful literary and theological construct. The meticulous recording of lineages serves to establish legitimacy, confirm identity, and, most importantly for the Davidic line, demonstrate the unbroken continuity of God's covenant promises. The precise sequence of names, linking Zerubbabel directly to the royal house, functions as a powerful affirmation that God's plan for Israel, centered on the Davidic dynasty, was still active despite the exile. Furthermore, the selection and arrangement of these names create a sense of Continuity and Succession, reinforcing the idea that the divine blueprint for Israel's future was being faithfully executed through specific individuals across generations. Zerubbabel himself functions as a Symbol of post-exilic restoration and hope, his very presence in this line pointing forward to the ultimate fulfillment of the Davidic covenant in the Messiah.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This seemingly simple genealogical entry carries profound theological weight, serving as a powerful testament to God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises. By meticulously tracing the Davidic line through the exilic period and into the time of restoration with Zerubbabel, the Chronicler reassures his audience that God's plan for Israel, and specifically for the Davidic dynasty, remained intact despite national judgment and apparent collapse. It underscores the truth that God works through history, preserving a remnant and a lineage, to bring about His ultimate redemptive purposes. The inclusion of Zerubbabel, a key figure in the rebuilding of the Temple, signals God's active involvement in the restoration of His people and the re-establishment of worship in Jerusalem. This continuity of the Davidic line, even when the monarchy was absent, kept alive the hope for the ultimate King, the Messiah, who would fully and eternally fulfill the promises made to David.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 1 Chronicles 3:19 appears as a dry list of names, its profound spiritual implications for believers today are immense. It serves as a powerful reminder that God's purposes are meticulously woven through the fabric of history, often in ways that are not immediately apparent to those living through challenging times. Just as God preserved the Davidic line through the tumultuous period of exile, ensuring the eventual arrival of the Messiah, so too does He faithfully work in our lives, even amidst our own seasons of brokenness, uncertainty, or waiting. This verse encourages us to trust in God's long-term plan, to recognize His sovereignty over generations, and to find hope in His ability to restore and rebuild what seems lost. It calls us to see ourselves as part of a larger, ongoing narrative of God's redemptive work, reminding us that our individual lives, like the names in this genealogy, contribute to His grand design for humanity. We are invited to participate in His faithfulness, knowing that He is always at work, bringing about His promised future.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous preservation of this ancient genealogy strengthen your faith in God's faithfulness to His promises, even when circumstances seem bleak?
  • Considering Zerubbabel's role in rebuilding after destruction, what areas in your life or community might God be calling you to participate in His work of restoration?
  • How does understanding your place within God's continuous story, as revealed through Scripture, impact your sense of identity and purpose today?

FAQ

Why are biblical genealogies, like the one in 1 Chronicles 3:19, so important?

Answer: Biblical genealogies are far more than mere historical records; they serve crucial theological and practical purposes. For the ancient Israelites, they established tribal identity, confirmed land inheritance, validated priestly and Levitical roles, and, most importantly, demonstrated the continuity of God's covenant promises. In the case of the Davidic line, the genealogies in books like 1 Chronicles were essential for affirming the legitimacy of the royal house and preserving the hope for the Messiah, who was prophesied to come from David's lineage (e.g., Isaiah 11:1). They underscore God's meticulous work through history, showing how He faithfully orchestrates events and preserves individuals to fulfill His overarching redemptive plan.

What was Zerubbabel's main role and why is he so significant?

Answer: Zerubbabel was a pivotal figure in the post-exilic period, serving as the governor of Judah under Persian rule. His primary significance lies in his leadership of the first wave of Jewish exiles returning from Babylon and, most notably, his instrumental role in the rebuilding of the Second Temple in Jerusalem. He laid the foundation of the Temple (Ezra 3:8-13) and oversaw its completion despite significant opposition (Ezra 5:1-2). As a direct descendant of King David, his leadership symbolized the restoration of God's presence among His people and the rekindling of the Davidic hope for a future king. The prophets Haggai and Zechariah specifically encouraged him in his work, highlighting his divine appointment (Haggai 1:1).

Why does 1 Chronicles 3:19 name Pedaiah as Zerubbabel's father, when other texts refer to Shealtiel?

Answer: This is a point of scholarly discussion. While 1 Chronicles 3:19 states that Zerubbabel and Shimei were the sons of Pedaiah, other passages (e.g., Ezra 3:2, Nehemiah 12:1, Haggai 1:1, Matthew 1:12) consistently refer to Zerubbabel as the son of Shealtiel. 1 Chronicles 3:17-18 lists Shealtiel and Pedaiah as brothers, both sons of King Jeconiah. Several theories attempt to reconcile this:

  • Levirate Marriage: Pedaiah may have married Shealtiel's widow (if Shealtiel died childless) to raise up an heir for his brother, with Zerubbabel legally considered Shealtiel's son.
  • Adoption: Pedaiah may have adopted Zerubbabel.
  • Scribal Variation/Alternative Tradition: The Chronicler may have followed a different, yet legitimate, genealogical tradition.
  • Descent through Mother: Zerubbabel might have been Shealtiel's son but also considered Pedaiah's son through a maternal link or a more complex family structure.
    Regardless of the precise biological or legal relationship, the key theological point for the Chronicler remains Zerubbabel's undisputed place within the Davidic royal line, ensuring the continuity of the Messianic promise.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The meticulous preservation of the Davidic lineage in 1 Chronicles 3:19, particularly through the figure of Zerubbabel, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Zerubbabel, as the leader who spearheaded the rebuilding of the Temple after the exile, foreshadows Christ, who is the true and ultimate Temple, the dwelling place of God among humanity (John 2:19-21). Just as Zerubbabel was a "signet ring" in God's hand, chosen to rebuild and restore (Haggai 2:23), so Christ is the chosen King, the promised Son of David, through whom God establishes His eternal kingdom. The genealogies of Jesus in the New Testament, notably in Matthew 1:12 and Luke 3:27, explicitly trace His ancestry back through Zerubbabel to David, confirming His legitimate claim to the Davidic throne. Thus, 1 Chronicles 3:19 is not just a historical record; it is a vital link in the unfolding divine narrative that culminates in the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world and the eternal King who perfectly fulfills all of God's promises to David.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 3 verses 10–24

David having nineteen sons, we may suppose them to have raised many noble families in Israel whom we never hear of in the history. But the scripture gives us an account only of the descendants of Solomon here, and of Nathan, Lu. 3. The rest had the honour to be the sons of David; but these only had the honour to be related to the Messiah. The sons of Nathan were his fathers as man, the sons of Solomon his predecessors as king. We have here, 1. The great and celebrated names by which the line of David is drawn down to the captivity, the kings of Judah in a lineal succession, the history of whom we have had at large in the two books of Kings and shall meet with again in the second book of Chronicles. Seldom has a crown gone in a direct line from father to son for seventeen descents together, as here. This was the recompence of David's piety. About the time of the captivity the lineal descent was interrupted, and the crown went from one brother to another and from a nephew to an uncle, which was a presage of the eclipsing of the glory of that house. 2. The less famous, and most of them very obscure, names, in which the house of David subsisted after the captivity. The only famous man of that house that we meet with at their return from captivity was Zerubbabel, elsewhere called the son of Salathiel, but appearing here to be his grandson (Ch1 3:17-19), which is usual in scripture. Belshazzar is called Nebuchadnezzar's son, but was his grandson. Salathiel is said to be the son of Jeconiah because adopted by him, and because, as some think, he succeeded him in the dignity to which he was restored by Evil-merodach. Otherwise Jeconiah was written childless: he was the signet God plucked from his right hand (Jer 22:24), and in his room Zerubbabel was placed, and therefore God saith to him (Hag 2:23), I will make thee as a signet. The posterity of Zerubbabel here bear not the same names that they do in the genealogies (Mt. 1, or Lu. 3), but those no doubt were taken from the then herald's office, the public registers which the priests kept of all the families of Judah, especially that of David. The last person named in this chapter is Anani, of whom bishop Patrick says that the Targum adds these words, He is the king Messiah, who is to be revealed, and some of the Jewish writers give this reason, because it is said (Dan 7:13), the son of man came gnim gnanani - with the clouds of heaven. The reason indeed is very foreign and far-fetched; but that learned man thinks it may be made use of as an evidence that their minds were always full of the thoughts of the Messiah and that they expected it would not be very long after the days of Zerubbabel before the set time of his approach would come.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–24. Public domain.
Copy as
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON FIRST CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The Chronicles also speak about the tabernacle because a temple of the Lord had not yet been built by either Samuel or David. The text also adds that that the holy services were held in the tabernacle. Worship was observed at that time according to the number of the days of the week. For it also says, “and their kindred who were in their villages were obliged to come in every seven days, in turn, to be with them.” With regard to the holy utensils it says, “Some of them had charge of the utensils of service, for they were required to count them when they were brought in and taken out. Others of them were appointed over the furniture, and over all the holy utensils, also over the choice flour, the wine, the oil, the incense and the spices.” And about the priests it says, “Others, of the sons of the priests, prepared the mixing of the spices.” With regard to the tomb of Saul the Chronicles gives us much information, and in the Book of Kings itself we read that his bones were gathered and buried in the land of Jabesh.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
There is abundant information in the books of Chronicles which were written to continue the books of the Kings and to preserve the memory of such important events. The first book begins with a genealogy that sets out to demonstrate how the human race came from a single man. Since it focuses only on the single kingdom of Judah, it can tell us about its cities and the villages, and from where they took their names. Here we come to know Nathan, from whom the blessed Luke constructed the beginning of his genealogy of our Lord and Savior, Son of David and Solomon’s brother4 on his mother’s side: “The following children were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimeah, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, that is, the four children he fathered with Bersabea, daughter of Ammiel.” And Rechab6 herself, who is mentioned in many books of Scripture, is said to have come from the tribe of Judah.It also clearly explains why Reuben lost his birthright and Joseph gained it and also, finally, the reason why the tribe of Judah obtained the highest honor: “The sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. He was the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, so that he is not enrolled in the genealogy according to the birthright; though Judah became prominent among his brothers and a ruler came from him, yet the birthright belonged to Joseph.” It also explains the reason why such a great honor was conceded to Joseph. By the will of God Judah had the dignity of receiving the Lord who was born from him according to the flesh. This is the sense tacitly expressed with the words “a leader from him.” Indeed the passage seems to assert that not only the kings of the earth derived from Judah, but also the eternal king himself who had no beginning and will never end.
It also describes the situation of the tribes beyond the Jordan, those of Reuben and Gad, and even the tribes of Manasseh which later were received into those of the Hagarites and the Itureans, and talks about the tribes of the Naphiseans, and all those peoples who entered into conflict with them. In addition the text relates how they fought and won, and made the Hagarites flee. And it also reports the reason for the victory: “When they received help against them, the Hagarites and all who were with them were given into their hands, for they cried to God in the battle, and he granted their entreaty because they trusted in him.” It also describes the amount of the spoils of war: “They captured their livestock: 50, of their camels, 250, sheep, 2, donkeys and 100, captives. Many were slain because the war was from God. And they lived in their territory until the exile.”
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
QUESTIONS ON 1 CHRONICLES, PROLOGUE
The genealogy of the priests and the Levites comes after this. It relates that Zadok, who was high priest at the time of David, had been the eleventh from Aaron; that Azariah, nephew of Zadok, had been the first to receive the priestly anointing in the temple built by Solomon. Among them there was also Jehozadak, who was brought to Babylon as a war prisoner. Jesus9 was his son, a high priest as well, who delivered the people from bondage together with Zerubbabel, and built a temple for the Lord. Here we also learn that Korah, who revolted against the great Moses, was a nephew of Isaar, son of Caath and brother of Amram, Aaron’s and Moses’ father. According to this lineage he was related to the first legislator. But he himself paid in the desert for his errors, although his children did not share the punishment of their father. From here Samuel13 came and then Aeman, who intoned Psalms and was a nephew of the prophet Samuel. In fact he was the son of Joel, son of Samuel. On the other hand, Asaph, one of the singers, came from the lineage of Gerson, son of Levi and brother of Caath. Aetham, who also belonged to the group of the singers, had Merari, the third son of Levi, as great-grandfather.The text also explains the difference between the priests and the Levites. It relates that the Levites were initiated into all the ministries of the holy altar of God: “But Aaron and his sons made offerings on the altar of burnt offering and on the altar of incense, doing all the work of the most holy place, to make atonement for Israel, according to all that Moses the servant of God had commanded.” It seems to me, in fact, that this book was written after the return from Babylon. For this reason it also talks about the bondage and explains its cause: “So all Israel was enrolled by genealogies; and these are written in the book of the Kings of Israel. And Judah was taken into exile in Babylon because of their unfaithfulness. Now the first to live again in their possessions in their towns were Israelites, priests, Levites, and temple servants.” These accounts show that the book was begun after the captivity. Indeed no historian ever relates facts that happened afterwards, but what happened before or during his times. And actually only the prophets have the power to foretell the future. In addition it says that also those who had inhabited that land before them had been enslaved. And actually many of them still live with them: the Canaanites, Chettites, Jebusites, who had been their companions in such a misfortune. Also the priests and the Levites were brought into captivity with the Israelites. I believe that those who were called “the saints’ servants” were then called Nathinim. Many of them, in fact, consecrated themselves to the ministries of the priests and the Levites. There were among them also those who were entrusted with the carrying of the water, the gathering of wood and other necessary duties. Indeed, if it was imposed to the Gabaonites, who were foreigners, to follow Joshua in the praises and to perform some works as porters or carpenters, this task was even more the duty of the Israelites. As a proof of this I have found in the interpretation of Hebrew names that this name means “house of Iaō,” that is, “of the God who is.” The text, in fact, mentions the children of Israel and among them Judah and Benjamin, and Ephraim18 and Manasseh. It also mentions the priests and the Levites, who inhabited those cities. About the Korēnites it says that they derived from Korah. It also says that among them there had been the guardians of the temple of God as well, and it seems that this custom had been introduced by Samuel and David. “All these, who were chosen as gatekeepers at the thresholds, were two hundred twelve. They were enrolled by genealogies in their villages. David and the prophet Samuel established them in their office of trust. So they and their descendants were in charge of the gates of the house of the Lord, that is, the house of the tent, as guards. The gatekeepers were on the four sides, east, west, north, and south.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 3:19 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.