Which was [the son] of Joanna, which was [the son] of Rhesa, which was [the son] of Zorobabel, which was [the son] of Salathiel, which was [the son] of Neri,
Which was the son of Joanna {G2490}, which was the son of Rhesa {G4488}, which was the son of Zorobabel {G2216}, which was the son of Salathiel {G4528}, which was the son of Neri {G3518},
of Yochanan, of Reisha, of Z'rubavel, of Sh'altiel, of Neri,
the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri,
the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel, the son of Neri,
-
Matthew 1:12
And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;
Luke 3:27 is a single verse within the extensive genealogy of Jesus Christ presented in Luke's Gospel. Unlike Matthew's genealogy which traces forward from Abraham to Jesus, Luke's account meticulously traces backward from Jesus all the way to Adam, emphasizing Jesus's connection to all humanity. This verse specifically lists five generations in this reversed lineage: Joanna, Rhesa, Zorobabel, Salathiel, and Neri, each identified as 'the son' of the preceding individual.
Context
Luke's gospel, often noted for its historical precision and universal appeal, places this detailed genealogy immediately after Jesus's baptism and prior to the commencement of His public ministry. The inclusion of such a long list of names, spanning centuries, serves to establish Jesus's legitimate human ancestry. While Matthew’s genealogy typically highlights Jesus’s royal Davidic lineage through Joseph for a Jewish audience, Luke’s genealogy, often considered to be Mary's lineage or a legal lineage through Joseph tracing back through Nathan (another son of David), aims to connect Jesus with all mankind, showing Him as the Son of Man who comes for all peoples. The names in this verse, like Zorobabel (Zerubbabel) and Salathiel, are significant as they connect Jesus directly to figures prominent in the Old Testament, particularly from the post-exilic period.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The repetitive phrase "which was [the son] of" (Greek: tou) emphasizes the direct, generational succession. In ancient Jewish culture, genealogies were not just lists of names but served as legal documents, establishing claims to land, tribal affiliation, and, most importantly, royal and priestly heritage. While the exact lineage details between Luke and Matthew's genealogies have been subjects of scholarly discussion for centuries, both ultimately affirm Jesus's rightful place in the messianic line.
Practical Application
Luke 3:27, as part of a larger genealogy, reminds us that God's plan is intricate and stretches across generations. It encourages us to appreciate the long history of God's interaction with humanity and to recognize Jesus's profound connection to our shared human experience. His humanity means He understands our struggles and temptations (Hebrews 4:15). This verse also subtly highlights the importance of every individual in God's grand narrative; even seemingly obscure names play a vital role in the unfolding of His divine purpose.