1 Chronicles 27:20

Translation
King James Version
Of the children of Ephraim, Hoshea the son of Azaziah: of the half tribe of Manasseh, Joel the son of Pedaiah:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Of the children H1121 of Ephraim H669, Hoshea H1954 the son H1121 of Azaziah H5812: of the half H2677 tribe H7626 of Manasseh H4519, Joel H3100 the son H1121 of Pedaiah H6305:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
of the descendants of Efrayim: Hoshea the son of 'Azazyahu; of the half-tribe of M'nasheh: Yo'el the son of P'dayah;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
over the Ephraimites was Hoshea son of Azaziah; over one of the half-tribes of Manasseh was Joel son of Pedaiah;
Ask
American Standard Version
of the children of Ephraim, Hoshea the son of Azaziah: of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Joel the son of Pedaiah:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
of the children of Ephraim, Hoshea the son of Azaziah: of the half-tribe of Manasseh, Joel the son of Pedaiah:
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Ouer the sonnes of Ephraim, Hoshea the sonne of Azazziah: ouer the halfe tribe of Manasseh, Ioel the sonne of Pedaiah:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
of the sons of Ephraim, Hoshea son of Azaziah; of the half of the tribe of Manasseh, Joel son of Pedaiah;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 11,130 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

This verse, 1 Chronicles 27:20, meticulously records the appointment of Hoshea son of Azaziah as commander over the tribe of Ephraim and Joel son of Pedaiah over the half-tribe of Manasseh. It is an integral part of King David's comprehensive administrative and military reorganization, detailing the specific leaders responsible for the monthly divisions of Israel's tribal levies, thereby underscoring David's commitment to order, accountability, and the unified strength of the nation under God.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse, 1 Chronicles 27:20, is situated within a broader administrative register in 1 Chronicles 27, which meticulously details King David's elaborate governmental structure. Specifically, verses 16-22 list the princes or leaders appointed over each of the twelve tribes of Israel. This section is distinct from the military commanders of the monthly divisions mentioned in verses 1-15, though both contribute to the overall picture of David's organized kingdom. The Chronicler's emphasis on these detailed lists underscores David's divinely inspired wisdom in establishing a stable and organized kingdom, reflecting the fulfillment of God's promises of order and prosperity for His people. The chapter concludes with a summary of David's other key officials, including those overseeing his treasuries, fields, vineyards, and flocks, as well as his counselors and chief military officers (1 Chronicles 27:25-34).
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Israel, tribal identity remained a fundamental aspect of societal and political organization, even under a unified monarchy. While David had established a centralized government in Jerusalem, the practical administration and mobilization of resources and manpower still relied heavily on the existing tribal structures. The appointment of specific leaders like Hoshea and Joel over their respective tribes was crucial for maintaining order, collecting taxes, administering justice, and raising military levies from their territories. Ephraim and Manasseh, as the two sons of Joseph, collectively formed the "House of Joseph," which was one of the most populous and influential blocs among the northern tribes, possessing significant land holdings as detailed in Joshua 16 and Joshua 17. David's careful selection and listing of these tribal heads demonstrate his strategic insight in integrating traditional tribal loyalties into a cohesive national framework, ensuring the effective governance and defense of his vast kingdom in a period of relative peace and expansion.
  • Key Themes: The Chronicler's detailed enumeration of David's officials throughout 1 Chronicles 27 highlights a pervasive theme of divine order and human stewardship. This meticulous record is not merely a dry list of names but a testament to David's commitment to establishing a kingdom founded on wise governance and strategic planning. The systematic appointment of tribal leaders, military commanders, and various administrators reflects a profound understanding that national stability and effective functioning depend on clear structures and defined responsibilities, mirroring God's own character of order as seen in creation and covenant. The naming of specific individuals like Hoshea and Joel underscores the principle of delegated authority and personal accountability. Each tribal leader was entrusted with significant responsibility for his people, serving as a vital link between the central monarchy and the distinct tribal units. This system ensured that leadership was distributed and that there were clear lines of responsibility for the welfare, defense, and administration of each tribal territory. Such detailed record-keeping in 1 Chronicles emphasizes the importance of faithful and responsible leadership within God's people. Despite the enduring distinctiveness of the twelve tribes, David's administrative system, as evidenced by the appointments in 1 Chronicles 27:16-22, successfully integrated them into a unified national entity. This integration was crucial for national defense, resource management, and the overall stability of the kingdom, demonstrating how individual identities could be preserved while contributing to a greater, unified whole under God's chosen king.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Hoshea (Hebrew, Hôwshêaʻ, H1954): Meaning "deliverer." This name carries significant theological weight, most famously being the original name of Joshua, son of Nun, before Moses changed it to Yehoshua ("Yahweh is salvation") in Numbers 13:16. The presence of this name in David's administration subtly connects to the broader theme of God's saving activity through His chosen leaders, even in administrative roles.
  • Azaziah (Hebrew, ʻĂzazyâhûw, H5812): Meaning "Jah has strengthened." This name, borne by Hoshea's father, reflects a common Israelite practice of incorporating divine names (like Yah or Yahweh) into personal names, signifying a family's faith or a prayer for divine intervention. It underscores the belief that true strength and capability ultimately derive from God.
  • Joel (Hebrew, Yôwʼêl, H3100): Meaning "Jehovah (is his) God." This profound theological statement embedded in a personal name highlights the core confession of Israelite faith – that Yahweh alone is the true and living God. The prominence of such names among David's officials suggests a kingdom where divine sovereignty and human responsibility were intertwined, and where leaders were expected to embody and uphold the covenant relationship with God.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Of the children of Ephraim, Hoshea the son of Azaziah:" This clause identifies the specific leader appointed over the influential tribe of Ephraim. Ephraim, along with Manasseh, constituted the "House of Joseph," a significant and populous tribal bloc in the northern kingdom. The mention of "Hoshea the son of Azaziah" provides a precise, identifiable individual, emphasizing the personal nature of leadership and accountability within David's structured administration. This detail highlights the meticulous record-keeping of the Chronicler, affirming the historical reality and importance of these appointments.
  • "of the half tribe of Manasseh, Joel the son of Pedaiah:" This second clause parallels the first, naming the leader for the half-tribe of Manasseh. Manasseh was unique in being divided into two half-tribes, one west and one east of the Jordan River (Joshua 17:1-6). The specific mention of "Joel the son of Pedaiah" for this half-tribe indicates David's comprehensive approach to governance, ensuring that even distinct sub-tribal units had designated leadership. The inclusion of both Ephraim and Manasseh underscores the importance of the Josephite tribes within the unified kingdom and David's efforts to integrate all Israelite segments under his centralized rule.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device employed in 1 Chronicles 27:20, and indeed throughout much of 1 Chronicles 27, is Enumeration or Cataloging. This involves the systematic listing of names and their associated roles, serving to provide a comprehensive and authoritative record of David's administrative and military organization. The meticulous detail of these lists lends an air of historical veracity and reinforces the Chronicler's intent to demonstrate the order and stability of David's kingdom. Furthermore, the verse exhibits Parallelism in its structure, presenting the appointment for Ephraim and then for Manasseh in a similar grammatical construction ("Of the children of X, Y the son of Z"), which creates a rhythmic flow and emphasizes the equal importance of each tribal appointment within the larger scheme. The focus on specific individuals and their patronymics also highlights the device of Onomastics, where the very names chosen often carry theological or historical significance, subtly enriching the narrative for the discerning reader.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

While seemingly a dry administrative record, 1 Chronicles 27:20 speaks volumes about the theological principles guiding David's reign. It reflects a profound understanding that effective governance is not merely a human endeavor but a divinely ordained responsibility. The meticulous organization and delegation of authority underscore God's character as a God of order, who brings cosmos out of chaos (Genesis 1:1-2). David's commitment to structure and accountability among his leaders mirrors the divine expectation for His people to live in an orderly and just society, reflecting His own righteousness. The inclusion of tribal leaders, even under a unified monarchy, also speaks to the enduring value of distinct identities within a unified body, a theme that resonates with the New Testament concept of the church as a body with many members (1 Corinthians 12:12-27). This verse, therefore, implicitly teaches that God cares about the details of human administration and that faithful leadership, even in seemingly mundane tasks, contributes to the flourishing of His people and the advancement of His kingdom purposes.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific administrative structures of King David's time may seem distant, the underlying principles revealed in 1 Chronicles 27:20 remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This verse reminds us that God values order, good stewardship, and responsible leadership in all spheres of life, not just the overtly "spiritual." Whether in our homes, workplaces, churches, or communities, the call to establish clear structures, delegate tasks wisely, and hold one another accountable is a reflection of God's character and a pathway to flourishing. We are encouraged to embrace our specific roles, no matter how seemingly small, recognizing that every contribution, when offered faithfully, builds up the whole. Just as Hoshea and Joel served in their appointed capacities, we too are called to exercise our gifts and responsibilities with diligence and integrity, understanding that our efforts contribute to a larger divine purpose and the well-being of those around us. This passage challenges us to consider how we can bring more intentionality and godly order to our own spheres of influence, trusting that even the smallest acts of faithful service are significant in God's eyes.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the emphasis on order and delegated authority in David's kingdom challenge or affirm your understanding of effective leadership in your own life or community?
  • In what ways can you apply the principle of accountability, as seen in David's administration, to your personal responsibilities or your role within a group?
  • Considering the significance of individual contributions to a larger whole, what is one specific area where you can more faithfully exercise your gifts or responsibilities for the common good?

FAQ

What was the primary purpose of listing these tribal leaders in 1 Chronicles?

Answer: The primary purpose of listing these tribal leaders, such as Hoshea and Joel in 1 Chronicles 27:20, was to provide a comprehensive and authoritative record of King David's administrative and military organization. The Chronicler meticulously details these appointments to demonstrate the order, stability, and unified nature of David's kingdom, which was established under God's blessing. These lists highlight David's wise governance, his commitment to effective delegation, and the integration of all tribal units into a cohesive national structure, ensuring both defense and internal administration. They serve to underscore the historical reality of a well-ordered kingdom under a divinely appointed king, a model for future generations.

How do the names in this verse, like Hoshea and Joel, reflect ancient Israelite culture?

Answer: The names Hoshea and Joel, along with their fathers' names Azaziah and Pedaiah, are deeply reflective of ancient Israelite culture, particularly in their onomastic (name-giving) practices. Many Israelite names were "theophoric," meaning they incorporated an element of God's name (like "Yah" or "El") or expressed a theological concept. "Hoshea" means "deliverer," while "Joel" means "Jehovah (is his) God." "Azaziah" means "Jah has strengthened," and "Pedaiah" means "Jah has ransomed." This practice demonstrates the pervasive influence of faith and theology in daily life, as parents often named their children to express their devotion, give thanks for God's blessings, or articulate their hopes for the child's character or destiny. Such names served as constant reminders of God's character and His active involvement in the lives of His people.

Is there a distinction between the "monthly commanders" and the "tribal princes" in 1 Chronicles 27?

Answer: Yes, there is a clear distinction. 1 Chronicles 27 details two primary sets of leaders. Verses 1-15 list the commanders of the twelve monthly military divisions, each responsible for 24,000 men who served the king one month out of the year. These were military leaders. In contrast, verses 16-22, where 1 Chronicles 27:20 is located, list the "princes of the tribes of Israel." These individuals were the civil or administrative heads of each tribe, likely responsible for internal tribal affairs, justice, and representing their tribe's interests to the central government. While some individuals might have held multiple roles, the Chronicler presents these as distinct categories of leadership within David's comprehensive system of governance.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 1 Chronicles 27:20 may seem far removed from the person of Christ, it subtly points to Him through its themes of divine order, faithful leadership, and the unification of God's people. David, as a type of the messianic king, established a kingdom marked by meticulous organization and delegated authority, foreshadowing the perfect and eternal kingdom of God established by Jesus Christ. Just as David appointed leaders over distinct tribes to ensure the well-being and unity of Israel, Christ, as the head of the church, has established a new spiritual administration, appointing apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers to equip the saints for the work of ministry (Ephesians 4:11-12). The names themselves, like "Hoshea" (deliverer) and "Joel" (Jehovah is his God), resonate deeply with the person of Jesus, who is the ultimate salvation of God, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, and the very embodiment of God made flesh (John 1:1, 14). In Christ, the divisions of old are overcome, and people from every tribe and nation are united into one body, the church, under His perfect and eternal reign (Revelation 7:9-10). Thus, this ancient administrative record ultimately directs our gaze to the King of kings, who perfectly fulfills all the order, unity, and salvation that David's kingdom imperfectly anticipated.

Copy as

Commentary on 1 Chronicles 27 verses 16–34

We have here an account,

I. Of the princes of the tribes. Something of the ancient order instituted by Moses in the wilderness was still kept up, that every tribe should have its prince or chief. It is probable that it was kept up all along, either by election or by succession, in the same family; and those are here named who were found in that office when this account was taken. Elihu, or Eliab, who was prince of Judah, was the eldest son of Jesse, and descended in a right line from Nahshon and Salmon, the princes of this tribe in Moses's time. Whether these princes were of the nature of lord-lieutenants that guided them in their military affairs, or chief-justices that presided in their courts of judgment, does not appear. Their power, we may suppose, was much less now that all the tribes were united under one king than it had been when, for the most part, they acted separately. Our religion obliges us to be subject, not only to the king as supreme, but unto governors under him (Pe1 2:13, Pe1 2:14), the princes that decree justice. Of Benjamin was Jaaziel the son of Abner, Ch1 27:21. Though Abner was David's enemy, and opposed his coming to the throne, yet David would not oppose the preferment of his son, but perhaps nominated him to this post of honour, which teaches us to render good for evil.

II. Of the numbering of the people, Ch1 27:23, Ch1 27:24. It is here said, 1. That when David ordered the people to be numbered he forbade the numbering of those under twenty years old, thinking thereby to save the reflection which what he did might otherwise cast upon the promise that they should be innumerable; yet it was but a poor salvo, for it had never been customary to number those under twenty, and the promise of their numbers chiefly respected the effective men. 2. That the account which David took of the people, in the pride of his heart, turned to no good account; for it was never perfected, nor done with exactness, nor was it ever recorded as an authentic account. Joab was disgusted with it, and did it by halves; David was ashamed of it, and willing it should be forgotten, because there fell wrath for it against Israel. A good man cannot, in the reflection, please himself with that which he knows God is displeased with, cannot make use of that, nor take comfort in that, which is obtained by sin.

III. Of the officers of the court. 1. The rulers of the king's substance (as they are called, Ch1 27:31), such as had the oversight and charge of the king's tillage, his vineyards, his olive-yards, his herds, his camels, his asses, his flocks. Here are no officers for state, none for sport, no master of the wardrobe, no master of the ceremonies, no master of the horse, no master of the hounds, but all for service, agreeable to the simplicity and plainness of those times. David was a great soldier, a great scholar, and a great prince, and yet a great husband of his estate, kept a great deal of ground in his own hand, and stocked it, not for pleasure, but for profit; for the king himself is served of the field, Ecc 5:9. Those magistrates that would have their subjects industrious must themselves be examples of industry and application to business. We find, however, that afterwards the poor of the land were thought good enough to be vine-dressers and husbandmen, Kg2 25:12. Now David put his great men to preside in these employments. 2. The attendants on the king's person. They were such as were eminent for wisdom, being designed for conversation. His uncle, who was a wise man and a scribe, not only well skilled in politics, but well read in the scriptures, was his counsellor, Ch1 27:32. Another, who no doubt excelled in learning and prudence, was tutor to his children. Ahithophel, a very cunning man, was his counsellor: but Hushai, an honest man, was his companion and confidant. It does not appear that he had many counsellors; but those he had were men of great abilities. Much of the wisdom of princes is seen in the choice of their ministry. But David, though he had all these trusty and well-beloved cousins and counsellors about him, preferred his Bible before them all. Psa 119:24, Thy testimonies are my delight and my counsellors.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 16–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 1 Chronicles 27:20 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.