TRV
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers 1 Chronicles 17:1–15. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.
Let us observe here,
I.How desirous and solicitous good people should be to serve the interests of God's kingdom in the world, to the utmost of their capacity.
David could not be easy in a house of cedar while the ark was lodged within curtains, Ch1 17:1. The concerns of the public should always be near our hearts. What pleasure can we take in our own prosperity if we see not the good of Jerusalem? When David is advanced to wealth and power see what his cares and projects are. Not, "What shall I do for my children to get portions for them? What shall I do to fill my coffers and enlarge my dominions?" But, "What shall I do for God, to serve and honour him?" Those that are contriving where to bestow their fruits and their good would do well to enquire what condition the ark is in, and whether some may not be well bestowed upon it.
II.How ready God's prophets should be to encourage every good purpose.
Nathan was no sooner aware of David's good design than he bade him go and do all that was within his heart (Ch1 17:2), for he had no reason to doubt but that God was with him in it. Ministers should stir up the gifts and graces that are in others as well as in themselves.
III.How little God affects external pomp and splendour in his service.
His ark was content with a tabernacle (Ch1 17:5) and he never so much as mentioned the building of a house for it; no, not when he had fixed his people in great and goodly cities which they builded not, Deu 6:10. He commanded the judges to feed his people, but never bade them build him a house, Ch1 17:6. We may well be content awhile with mean accommodations; God's ark was so.
IV.How graciously God accepts his people's good purposes, yea, though he himself prevents the performance of them.
David must not build this house, Ch1 17:4. He must prepare for it, but not do it; as Moses must bring Israel within sight of Canaan, but must them leave it to Joshua to put them in possession of it. It is the prerogative of Christ to be both the author and finisher of his work. Yet David must not think that, because he was not permitted to build the temple,
1.His preferment was in vain; no, "I took thee from the sheep-cote, though not to be a builder of the temple, yet to be ruler over my people Israel; that is honour enough for thee; leave the other to one that shall come after thee," Ch1 17:7. Why should one man think to engross all the business and to bring every good work to perfection? Let something be left for those that succeed. God had given him victories, and made him a name (Ch1 17:8), and, further, intended by him to establish his people Israel and secure them against their enemies, Ch1 17:9. That must be his work, who is a man of war and fit for it, and he must let the building of churches be left to one that was never cut out for a soldier. Nor,
2.Must he think that his good purpose was in vain, and that he should lose the reward of it; no, it being God's act to prevent the execution of it, he shall be as fully recompensed as if he had done it; "The Lord will build thee a house, and annex the crown of Israel to it," Ch1 17:10. If there be a willing mind, it shall not only be accepted, but thus rewarded. Nor,
3.Must he think that because he might not do this good work therefore it would never be done, and that it was in vain to think of it; no, I will raise up thy seed, and he shall build me a house, Ch1 17:11, Ch1 17:12. God's temple shall be built in the time appointed, though we may not have the honour of helping to build it or the satisfaction of seeing it built. Nor,
4.Must he confine his thoughts to the temporal prosperity of his family, but must entertain himself with the prospect of the kingdom of the Messiah, who should descend from his loins, and whose throne should be established for evermore, Ch1 17:14. Solomon was not himself so settled in God's house as he should have been, nor was his family settled in the kingdom: "But there shall one descend from thee whom I will settle in my house and in my kingdom," which intimates that he should be both a high priest over the house of God and should have the sole administration of the affairs of God's kingdom among men, all power both in heaven and in earth, in the house and in the kingdom, in the church and in the world. He shall be a priest upon his throne, and the counsel of peace shall be between them both, and he shall build the temple of the Lord, Zac 6:12, Zac 6:13.
Historical interpretation
Historical Reception
One surviving comment on this verse from the historical church.
There is no doubt that Solomon was the son of David and his successor in the kingdom. And he first built the temple of God at Jerusalem, and perhaps the Jews understand him to be the subject of the prophecy. But we may fairly ask them whether the oracle applies to Solomon, which says, “And I will set up his throne for ever,” and also where God swore with the affirmation of an oath by his holy one, “The throne of him that is foretold shall be as the sun and the days of heaven.” For if the years of the reign of Solomon are reckoned, they will be found to be forty and no more. Even if the reigns of all his successors are added up, they do not altogether come to 500 years. And even if we suppose that their line continued down to the final attack on the Jewish nation by the Romans, how can they fulfill a prophecy which says, “Your throne shall remain for ever, and be as the sun and the days of heaven”? And the words, “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son,” how can they refer to Solomon? For his history tells us much about him that is foreign and opposed to the adoption of God. No. Hear the indictment against him: “And Solomon loved women, and took many strange wives, even the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, and Idumaeans, Syrians and Chatteans, and Amorites, from the nations of whom the Lord said to the children of Israel, that they should not go in to them.”And in addition to this: “And his heart was not right with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father; and Solomon went after Astarte, the abomination of the Sidonians and after their king, the idol of the sons of Ammon. And Solomon did evil before the Lord.” And again further on he adds, “And the Lord raised Satan against Solomon, Ader the Idumaean.” Now who would venture to call God his father, who lay under such grievous charges, and to call himself the firstborn son of the God of the Universe? Or how could these sayings apply first to David, if you reflect. Therefore we require someone else, here revealed to arise from the seed of David. But there was no other born of him, as is recorded, save only our Lord and Savior Jesus the Christ of God, who alone of the kings of David’s line is called through the whole world the Son of David according to his earthly birth, and whose kingdom continues and will continue, lasting for endless time. It is attacked by many, but always by its divine superhuman power proves itself inspired and invincible as the prophecy foretold.
Continue studying 1 Chronicles 17:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
1 Chronicles 17:13 stands as a cornerstone of the Davidic Covenant, a profound divine promise delivered to King David through the prophet Nathan. This verse articulates God's intimate, enduring relationship with David's royal lineage, establishing a unique father-son bond with the future king and guaranteeing an unwavering, steadfast love that distinguishes this dynasty from its predecessor. It serves as a foundational declaration of God's sovereign faithfulness and the eternal nature of His covenant with David's house, setting the stage for the ultimate fulfillment in the Messiah.
Context
Literary Context
1 Chronicles 17:13 is deeply embedded within God's direct response to King David's heartfelt desire to build a magnificent temple for the Lord. The preceding verses (1 Chronicles 17:1-6) describe David's intention and Nathan's initial, humanly-informed approval, which is then immediately corrected by a divine revelation. God, through Nathan, clarifies that David will not build the house of God; rather, it will be David's son who undertakes this task (1 Chronicles 17:12). Crucially, God promises to build a "house" for David – a dynasty, a perpetual kingdom – rather than merely accepting a physical dwelling. This promise, detailed in 1 Chronicles 17:7-14, is a parallel account to the more extensive narrative in 2 Samuel 7. Verse 13, therefore, is a pivotal declaration within this covenant, defining the nature of God's relationship with David's successor and the permanence of the divine commitment. It sets the stage for the establishment of the Davidic line as the chosen royal family, through whom God's redemptive purposes would unfold, emphasizing divine initiative over human ambition.
Historical & Cultural Context
The historical setting is the early united monarchy of Israel, with David firmly established as king in Jerusalem. This period followed the tumultuous reign of Saul, Israel's first king, who was ultimately rejected by God due to his disobedience (as recounted in 1 Samuel 15). The concept of a divine "father" and a royal "son" was not unique to Israel; ancient Near Eastern cultures often employed such language to describe the relationship between a deity and a chosen king, signifying divine legitimation, protection, and authority. However, in Israel, this relationship was grounded in the unique covenant between Yahweh and His chosen people, now extended specifically to the king. The promise of an enduring dynasty was a radical departure from the instability of previous leadership structures (like the judges or Saul's short-lived kingdom) and provided a theological framework for the future of Israelite kingship, positioning it under divine suzerainty and promise. This covenant provided stability and a divinely sanctioned foundation for the monarchy.
Key Themes
The Davidic Covenant, as articulated in this chapter, introduces several profound theological and narrative themes. Firstly, it underscores Divine Initiative and Sovereignty, as God, not David, determines the nature and timing of the "house" building, both literal and dynastic. This highlights God's ultimate control over history and His redemptive plan. Secondly, the theme of Covenantal Faithfulness is paramount; God's promise to David is presented as unconditional and eternal, a stark contrast to the conditional nature of the Mosaic Covenant which often tied blessings to obedience. This promise of an "everlasting kingdom" (1 Chronicles 17:14) provides the bedrock for Israel's future hope and the anticipation of the Messiah. Thirdly, the declaration "I will be his father, and he shall be my son" introduces the theme of Divine Sonship, a concept that evolves from the corporate sonship of Israel (e.g., Exodus 4:22) to the specific adoption of the Davidic king, foreshadowing its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Finally, the explicit contrast with Saul's rejection highlights the theme of Unfailing Mercy and Steadfast Love (Hesed), emphasizing that God's commitment to David's line will not be withdrawn, unlike His favor from Saul (1 Samuel 15:23). This promise of enduring mercy becomes a beacon of hope for Israel's future, demonstrating God's unwavering commitment to His chosen lineage.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
In this context, "father" signifies not merely biological paternity but a profound covenantal relationship of protection, provision, authority, and intimacy. When God declares, "I will be his father," it implies divine adoption, bestowing upon the Davidic king a unique status as God's chosen representative and heir. This relationship elevates the king above typical human rulers, placing him under God's direct care and legitimizing his reign through divine appointment. It's a relationship of deep commitment and responsibility from God's side, establishing a unique bond of patronage and guidance.
Corresponding to "father," "son" here denotes a special, privileged status of heirship, dependence, and obedience. The king, as God's "son," is granted divine favor and protection, expected to represent God's rule on earth. This sonship is not inherent but conferred by divine decree, establishing a unique bond and an enduring lineage. It implies a special anointing and a role within God's redemptive plan, setting the Davidic king apart from all other rulers and designating him as the builder of God's house.
The Hebrew term chêçêd is a rich theological concept, often translated as "steadfast love," "covenant loyalty," "kindness," or "unfailing grace." Its use here, "I will not take my mercy away from him," is profoundly significant. Unlike a transactional relationship, chêçêd speaks to God's unwavering commitment rooted in His covenant promises, not in the recipient's perfect performance. It assures the enduring nature of God's favor and presence with David's descendants, guaranteeing the stability and permanence of the Davidic dynasty regardless of individual kings' failures, which is a crucial distinction from Saul's conditional reign. This divine chêçêd is the bedrock of the covenant's perpetuity.
Verse Breakdown
"I will be his father,"
This clause establishes a profound, intimate, and covenantal relationship between God and David's successor (initially Solomon, but extending to the entire Davidic line). It signifies divine adoption, where God takes on the role of a protective, guiding, and legitimizing Father, bestowing unique status and authority upon the king. This declaration elevates the king to a position of special favor and divine backing, ensuring his reign is divinely sanctioned and supported.
"and he shall be my son:"
This directly complements the preceding clause, defining the king's reciprocal status as God's chosen "son." As God's son, the king is endowed with divine authority, protection, and a unique responsibility to rule according to God's will. This sonship is not biological but a conferred, covenantal status, emphasizing the king's role as God's representative on earth and the heir to a divinely established throne, through whom God's purposes for Israel will be realized.
"and I will not take my mercy away from him,"
This is a crucial promise of enduring faithfulness. The "mercy" (chêçêd) refers to God's covenantal loyalty and steadfast love. This clause guarantees that God's commitment to David's dynasty will be unwavering and permanent, distinguishing it from previous, more conditional relationships. It assures that even in the face of human failure, God's foundational promise to the Davidic line will remain intact, ensuring the continuity of the royal lineage.
"as I took [it] from [him] that was before thee:"
This explicit comparison with King Saul (the one "before thee") highlights the absolute permanence and unconditional nature of God's covenant with David. God had indeed "taken away" His favor and the kingdom from Saul due to his disobedience (1 Samuel 15:28). By contrasting this with the promise to David's line, God emphasizes that David's dynasty will not suffer the same fate of rejection and termination, thereby assuring its eternal continuation and serving as a testament to God's sovereign and unwavering chêçêd.
Literary Devices
1 Chronicles 17:13 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound theological message. Central to the verse is the Covenant Formula, "I will be his father, and he shall be my son," which echoes ancient Near Eastern adoption and suzerain-vassal treaty language, but here imbued with unique Israelite theological meaning. This formula establishes a divine-human relationship that is both intimate and authoritative, signifying divine patronage and the king's unique status. The verse also utilizes Contrast or Antithesis by explicitly comparing God's enduring commitment to David's line with His withdrawal of favor from Saul ("as I took [it] from [him] that was before thee"). This stark juxtaposition underscores the unique and unconditional nature of the Davidic Covenant, highlighting God's unwavering chêçêd (steadfast love) in contrast to the conditional aspects of Saul's reign. Furthermore, the entire passage functions as Foreshadowing and Typology, where the immediate promise to Solomon and subsequent Davidic kings points beyond them to a greater, ultimate fulfillment in the Messiah, Jesus Christ, who perfectly embodies the divine Sonship and reigns on an eternal throne. The language of "house" (dynasty) and "kingdom" also carries Symbolism, representing not just a physical lineage but a spiritual and eternal reign that transcends earthly boundaries.
Theological and Thematic Connections
1 Chronicles 17:13 is a theological linchpin, anchoring the Davidic Covenant and revealing profound truths about God's character and redemptive plan. It showcases God's unwavering faithfulness and covenantal commitment, demonstrating that His promises are not contingent on human perfection but rooted in His own steadfast love (chêçêd). This verse establishes the concept of divine sonship for the Davidic king, a unique relationship that elevates the monarchy as a divinely sanctioned institution. This sonship, while initially applied to Solomon and his successors, ultimately finds its perfect and eternal realization in Jesus Christ, the true Son of God and heir to David's throne. The contrast with Saul's rejection underscores the permanence of God's grace towards David's line, assuring a perpetual dynasty that would serve as the conduit for the Messiah. This promise of an eternal kingdom becomes a central pillar of Israel's hope and a testament to God's sovereign plan to bring salvation through a chosen lineage, culminating in the person and work of Christ.
Reflection and Application
1 Chronicles 17:13 offers profound reassurance of God's unfailing faithfulness, a truth that transcends the historical context of ancient Israel and resonates deeply with believers today. It reminds us that God is a promise-keeping God, whose covenantal love (chêçêd) is not easily withdrawn. Just as He established an enduring relationship with David's lineage despite their imperfections, so too does He extend His steadfast love and mercy to us through Christ. This verse invites us to trust in God's unwavering character, knowing that His commitment to His children is secure. It challenges us to live in light of His promises, finding stability and hope not in our own performance, but in His unchangeable nature. When we face our own failures, doubts, or uncertainties, we can cling to the truth that God's mercy endures forever, providing a firm foundation for our faith and a powerful call to live faithfully in response to His boundless grace. This divine chêçêd empowers us to persevere and to rest in His sovereign care.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
What is the significance of God calling David's son "my son" and Himself "his father"?
This language signifies a unique, covenantal adoption, not biological paternity. It elevates the Davidic king to a special status as God's chosen representative and heir, granting him divine legitimation, protection, and authority. It establishes an intimate bond that assures the stability and perpetuity of the Davidic dynasty, setting it apart from other earthly kingdoms. This divine sonship is foundational to understanding the special role of the Davidic line in God's redemptive plan, ultimately pointing to the Messiah, who perfectly embodies this divine relationship. It underscores God's personal involvement and commitment to the Davidic throne.
How does God's promise not to take His mercy away from David's line differ from His actions towards King Saul?
The distinction is crucial. God explicitly states, "I will not take my mercy away from him, as I took [it] from [him] that was before thee." This refers to King Saul, from whom God withdrew His favor and the kingdom due to his disobedience and rebellion (see 1 Samuel 15:23 and 1 Samuel 15:28). While individual Davidic kings might face discipline for their sins (as implied in 2 Samuel 7:14), God's chêçêd (steadfast love/mercy) ensures that the dynasty itself would not be utterly rejected or terminated, guaranteeing its continuity until the coming of the Messiah. This highlights the unconditional nature of the Davidic Covenant regarding the perpetuation of the lineage, in stark contrast to the conditional nature of Saul's kingship.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
1 Chronicles 17:13 finds its ultimate and most profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The promise, "I will be his father, and he shall be my son," is perfectly realized in Jesus, who is uniquely and eternally the Son of God in a way no earthly king could ever be. The angel Gabriel's announcement to Mary explicitly links Jesus to this Davidic promise, declaring that "the Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob's descendants forever; his kingdom will never end" (Luke 1:32-33). Furthermore, the assurance, "I will not take my mercy away from him," points directly to the unfailing grace and eternal covenant established through Christ. Unlike the imperfections and eventual failures of Solomon and subsequent Davidic kings, Jesus perfectly embodies the ideal Son, never sinning, and therefore never incurring the need for God's mercy to be "taken away." His reign is one of perpetual righteousness and truth, secured by God's eternal chêçêd, as prophesied in passages like Isaiah 9:6-7. Through Christ, the Davidic covenant transforms from a promise to a specific earthly lineage to an eternal spiritual reality, inviting all who believe into the family of God, where they too become sons and daughters by adoption through the ultimate Son, Jesus. His kingdom is not of this world, yet it is an everlasting kingdom that encompasses all nations, fulfilling every nuance of God's ancient promise to David and establishing a new covenant in His blood (Luke 22:20).