Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Neither G3761, because G3754 they are G1526 the seed G4690 of Abraham G11, are they all G3956 children G5043: but G235, In G1722 Isaac G2464 shall G2564 thy G4671 seed G4690 be called G2564.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
indeed, not all the descendants are seed of Avraham; rather, “What is to be called your ‘seed’ will be in Yitz’chak.”
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Nor because they are Abraham’s descendants are they all his children. On the contrary, “Through Isaac your offspring will be reckoned.”
Ask
American Standard Version
neither, because they are Abraham’s seed, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Neither, because they are Abraham’s seed, are they all children. But, “In Isaac will your seed be called.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Neither are they all children, because they are the seede of Abraham: but, In Isaac shall thy seede be called:
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
nor because they are seed of Abraham are all children, but--`in Isaac shall a seed be called to thee;'
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Romans 9:7 is a pivotal verse in Paul's argument concerning God's faithfulness to Israel, asserting that physical descent from Abraham does not automatically qualify one as a true "child" or heir of God's covenant promises. By quoting God's declaration to Abraham regarding Isaac, Paul demonstrates that God's redemptive plan operates by sovereign election and divine designation, not by natural lineage, thereby laying the groundwork for understanding the spiritual nature of God's chosen people.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Romans 9:7 immediately follows Paul's profound declaration in Romans 9:6, "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel." This verse serves as the initial, concrete example to substantiate that claim. Paul is addressing the theological dilemma of Israel's widespread rejection of Christ, which might lead some to question God's fidelity to His covenant promises. To resolve this, he argues that God's promises were never intended for every physical descendant of Abraham, but rather for a select, divinely chosen lineage. The mention of Isaac sets the stage for further examples of God's selective election, such as Jacob over Esau in Romans 9:10-13, illustrating that God's choice is based on His purpose, not on human merit or natural birthright.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In first-century Judaism, being a physical descendant of Abraham was considered a paramount privilege and a guarantee of one's standing with God. Jewish identity was inextricably linked to this lineage, often leading to a sense of inherent righteousness or entitlement to God's blessings. This belief is evident in passages like Matthew 3:9 where John the Baptist warns against relying on Abrahamic descent. Paul, himself a Jew, understood this deeply ingrained conviction. His argument in Romans 9:7 directly challenges this prevailing cultural and theological assumption, asserting that God's covenant promises, while made to Abraham, are fulfilled through a specific, divinely chosen "seed," which transcends mere physical procreation.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several major themes within Romans and Paul's broader theology. Firstly, it underscores God's Sovereign Election, demonstrating that God's choice is not dependent on human will or effort, but on His divine purpose and grace. Secondly, it highlights the crucial Distinction Between Physical and Spiritual Lineage, clarifying that true membership in God's covenant people is not determined by biological ancestry but by God's call and spiritual relationship. This theme is further developed as Paul explains how Gentiles can become spiritual children of Abraham through faith in Christ (Romans 4:11-12). Thirdly, it emphasizes Covenant Specificity, showing that God's promises are precise and directed to His chosen instrument, as seen in His explicit declaration concerning Isaac in Genesis 21:12.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • seed (Greek, spérma', G4690): This term, while literally referring to offspring or descendants, carries significant theological weight here. Paul uses it to distinguish between the broad physical lineage of Abraham and the specific, divinely designated line through whom God's promises would be inherited. It points to a chosen, spiritual remnant rather than a general biological multitude.
  • children (Greek, téknon', G5043): Meaning "a child (as produced)," this word contrasts sharply with "seed" in this context. While all Abraham's physical "seed" are his descendants, not all are considered "children" in the sense of being heirs to the spiritual promises and blessings. This highlights the qualitative difference between natural birth and divine adoption or designation.
  • called (Greek, kaléō', G2564): This word, meaning "to call" or "to name," is crucial. In the context of "In Isaac shall thy seed be called," it signifies more than just a naming. It implies divine designation, selection, and constitution. God's "calling" of Isaac's line is an act of sovereign choice, establishing the specific channel through which His covenant promises would be fulfilled. It's a declaration of divine purpose and identity.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, [are they] all children": This opening clause directly refutes a common Jewish misconception. Paul asserts that merely being a physical descendant ("seed") of Abraham does not automatically confer the status of a true "child" or heir of God's covenant promises. It introduces the critical distinction between biological lineage and spiritual sonship, setting the stage for the subsequent clarification.
  • "but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.": This is the pivotal counter-statement, a direct quotation from Genesis 21:12. It reveals God's sovereign method of fulfilling His promises. The covenant line was not through Ishmael, or any other of Abraham's sons, but specifically through Isaac. The phrase "shall thy seed be called" signifies that God Himself designated Isaac as the one through whom Abraham's true "seed" — the inheritors of the promise — would be identified and established. This divine "calling" or naming is an act of election, demonstrating that God's choice is independent of human merit or natural birth order.

Literary Devices

Paul employs several significant literary devices in Romans 9:7. The most prominent is Quotation, as he directly cites Genesis 21:12. This direct appeal to Scripture serves as irrefutable proof for his argument, grounding his theological assertion in the authoritative word of God. Furthermore, there is a clear Contrast established between "seed of Abraham" (physical descendants) and "children" (spiritual heirs). This juxtaposition highlights the qualitative difference Paul is emphasizing, challenging the prevailing understanding of inherited privilege. The use of Isaac as an example functions as an Exemplum, providing a historical precedent that illustrates God's sovereign method of election. Finally, there's a subtle use of Synecdoche or Metonymy where "seed" initially refers broadly to descendants, but then is narrowed by divine designation to refer specifically to the line of promise through Isaac, representing the true inheritors of God's covenant.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Romans 9:7 is foundational to understanding the nature of God's covenant with humanity and the identity of His true people. It establishes that divine blessing and covenant participation are not based on human lineage, ethnicity, or works, but solely on God's sovereign choice and grace. This truth dismantles any notion of inherited spiritual privilege and underscores that God's promises are fulfilled according to His specific, elective purpose. It shifts the focus from human effort or birthright to God's unmerited favor, revealing that the true "Israel" is a spiritual entity, defined by God's call rather than by physical descent. This principle is crucial for understanding the inclusion of Gentiles into God's family, as it demonstrates that God has always operated by election, even within Abraham's own household.

  • Galatians 3:7-9: "Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham."
  • John 1:12-13: "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God."
  • Romans 2:28-29: "For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Romans 9:7 offers a profound challenge to any form of spiritual complacency or reliance on external markers of faith. It powerfully reminds us that our standing with God is never based on our family background, ethnic identity, religious heritage, or any human achievement. Instead, it is entirely dependent on God's sovereign grace and His divine call. This truth should cultivate deep humility within us, recognizing that our inclusion in God's family is a gift, not a right. It compels us to examine the true nature of our faith: Is it a genuine, personal relationship with God, or merely an inherited tradition? This verse also provides immense comfort, assuring us that God's promises are unfailing because they rest on His immutable character and sovereign purpose, not on the fickle faithfulness of humanity. Our security is found in His election, not in our lineage or performance.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might I be tempted to rely on my background, family, or religious tradition rather than on a personal, living faith in Christ?
  • How does understanding God's sovereign choice, as exemplified by Isaac, deepen my appreciation for His grace in my own salvation?
  • What does it mean for me to be a "true child of Abraham" today, and how does that influence my daily walk and witness?

FAQ

Does Romans 9:7 imply that God rejects all ethnic Jews?

Answer: No, Romans 9:7 does not imply that God rejects all ethnic Jews. Instead, it clarifies that God's covenant promises were never universally applied to all physical descendants of Abraham, but rather to a specific, divinely chosen line. Paul's argument throughout Romans 9-11 is complex. While he highlights God's sovereign election and the current hardening of some in Israel, he also affirms God's continued love for Israel and prophesies a future restoration for them (Romans 11:25-27). The verse simply distinguishes between physical descent and spiritual heirship, a distinction that applies to all people, whether Jew or Gentile.

What is the significance of the phrase "In Isaac shall thy seed be called"?

Answer: This phrase, directly quoted from Genesis 21:12, is profoundly significant. It means that God unilaterally and sovereignly designated Isaac, not Ishmael or any other son, as the specific channel through whom Abraham's true "seed" – the inheritors of the covenant promises – would be identified. The word "called" (Greek: kaléō) here implies more than just naming; it means to be divinely designated, constituted, or brought into existence as the true line of promise. It underscores that God's plan of salvation is not based on human merit, natural birth order, or Abraham's personal desires (he initially desired Ishmael to be the heir, Genesis 17:18), but solely on His own sovereign will and purpose.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Romans 9:7, by emphasizing that God's promises are fulfilled through a divinely chosen "seed" rather than through universal physical descent, ultimately points to Jesus Christ as the singular and ultimate "seed" of Abraham. As Galatians 3:16 declares, "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ." Christ is the true Isaac, the one uniquely "called" and designated by God to inherit and fulfill all the Abrahamic promises. Through His perfect obedience, sacrificial death, and resurrection, Jesus became the means by which all who believe, whether Jew or Gentile, are grafted into the spiritual lineage of Abraham, becoming "children of Abraham by faith" (Galatians 3:29). Thus, the principle of divine election, first illustrated with Isaac, finds its ultimate and inclusive fulfillment in Christ, through whom God's family is expanded to encompass all who are born "not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God" (John 1:12-13).

Copy as

Commentary on Romans 9 verses 6–13

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

The apostle, having made his way to that which he had to say, concerning the rejection of the body of his countrymen, with a protestation of his own affection for them and a concession of their undoubted privileges, comes in these verses, and the following part of the chapter, to prove that the rejection of the Jews, by the establishment of the gospel dispensation, did not at all invalidate the word of God's promise to the patriarchs: Not as though the word of God hath taken no effect (Rom 9:6), which, considering the present state of the Jews, which created to Paul so much heaviness and continual sorrow (Rom 9:2), might be suspected. We are not to ascribe inefficacy to any word of God: nothing that he has spoken does or can fall to the ground; see Isa 55:10, Isa 55:11. The promises and threatenings shall have their accomplishment; and, one way or other, he will magnify the law and make it honourable. This is to be understood especially of the promise of God, which by subsequent providences may be to a wavering faith very doubtful; but it is not, it cannot be, made of no effect; at the end it will speak and not lie.

Now the difficulty is to reconcile the rejection of the unbelieving Jews with the word of God's promise, and the external tokens of the divine favour, which had been conferred upon them. This he does in four ways: - 1. By explaining the true meaning and intention of the promise, Rom 9:6-13. 2. By asserting and proving the absolute sovereignty of God, in disposing of the children of men, Rom 9:14-24. 3. By showing how this rejection of the Jews, and the taking in of the Gentiles, were foretold in the Old Testament, Rom 9:25-29. 4. By fixing the true reason of the Jews' rejection, Rom 9:30, to the end.

In this paragraph the apostle explains the true meaning and intention of the promise. When we mistake the word, and misunderstand the promise, no marvel if we are ready to quarrel with God about the accomplishment; and therefore the sense of this must first be duly stated. Now he here makes it out that, when God said he would be a God to Abraham, and to his seed (which was the famous promise made unto the fathers), he did not mean it of all his seed according to the flesh, as if it were a necessary concomitant of the blood of Abraham; but that he intended it with a limitation only to such and such. And as from the beginning it was appropriated to Isaac and not to Ishmael, to Jacob and not to Esau, and yet for all this the word of God was not made of no effect; so now the same promise is appropriated to believing Jews that embrace Christ and Christianity, and, though it throws off multitudes that refuse Christ, yet the promise is not therefore defeated and invalidated, any more than it was by the typical rejection of Ishmael and Esau.

I. He lays down this proposition - that they are not all Israel who are of Israel (Rom 9:6), neither because they are, etc., Rom 9:7. Many that descended from the loins of Abraham and Jacob, and were of that people who were surnamed by the name of Israel, yet were very far from being Israelites indeed, interested in the saving benefits of the new covenant. They are not all really Israel that are so in name and profession. It does not follow that, because they are the seed of Abraham, therefore they must needs be the children of God, though they themselves fancied so, boasted much of, and built much upon, their relation to Abraham, Mat 3:9; Joh 8:38, Joh 8:39. But it does not follow. Grace does not run in the blood; nor are saving benefits inseparably annexed to external church privileges, though it is common for people thus to stretch the meaning of God's promise, to bolster themselves up in a vain hope.

II. He proves this by instances; and therein shows not only that some of Abraham's seed were chosen, and others not, but that God therein wrought according to the counsel of his own will; and not with regard to that law of commandments to which the present unbelieving Jews were so strangely wedded.

1.He specifies the case of Isaac and Ishmael, both of them the seed of Abraham; and yet Isaac only taken into covenant with God, and Ishmael rejected and cast out. For this he quotes Gen 21:12, In Isaac shall thy seed be called, which comes in there as a reason why Abraham must be willing to cast out the bond-woman and her son, because the covenant was to be established with Isaac, Gen 17:19. And yet the word which God had spoken, that he would be a God to Abraham and to his seed, did not therefore fall to the ground; for the blessings wrapt up in that great word, being communicated by God as a benefactor, he was free to determine on what head they should rest, and accordingly entailed them upon Isaac, and rejected Ishmael. This he explains further (Rom 9:8, Rom 9:9), and shows what God intended to teach us by this dispensation. (1.) That the children of the flesh, as such, by virtue of their relation to Abraham according to the flesh, are not therefore the children of God, for then Ishmael had put in a good claim. This remark comes home to the unbelieving Jews, who boasted of their relation to Abraham according to the flesh, and looked for justification in a fleshly way, by those carnal ordinances which Christ had abolished. They had confidence in the flesh, and looked for justification in a fleshly way, by those carnal ordinances which Christ had abolished. They had confidence in the flesh, Phi 3:3. Ishmael was a child of the flesh, conceived by Hagar, who was young and fresh, and likely enough to have children. There was nothing extraordinary or supernatural in his conception, as there was in Isaac's; he was born after the flesh (Gal 4:29), representing those that expect justification and salvation by their own strength and righteousness. (2.) That the children of the promise are counted for the seed. Those that have the honour and happiness of being counted for the seed have it not for the sake of any merit or desert of their own, but purely by virtue of the promise, in which God hath obliged himself of his own good pleasure to grant the promised favour. Isaac was a child of promise; this his proves, Rom 9:9, quoted from Gen 18:10. he was a child promised (so were many others), and he was also conceived and born by force and virtue of the promise, and so a proper type and figure of those who are now counted for the seed, even true believers, who are born, not of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God - of the incorruptible seed, even the word of promise, by virtue of the special promise of a new heart: see Gal 4:28. It was through faith that Isaac was conceived, Heb 11:11. Thus were the great mysteries of salvation taught under the Old Testament, not in express words, but by significant types and dispensations of providence, which to them then were not so clear as they are to us now, when the veil is taken away, and the types are expounded by the antitypes.

2.The case of Jacob and Esau (Rom 9:10-13), which is much stronger, to show that the carnal seed of Abraham were not, as such, interested in the promise, but only such of them as God in sovereignty had appointed. There was a previous difference between Ishmael and Isaac, before Ishmael was cast out: Ishmael was the son of the bond-woman, born long before Isaac, was of a fierce and rugged disposition, and had mocked or persecuted Isaac, to all which it might be supposed God had regard when he appointed Abraham to cast him out. But, in the case of Jacob and Esau, it was neither so nor so, they were both the sons of Isaac by one mother; they were conceived hex henos - by one conception; hex henos koitou, so some copies read it. The difference was made between them by the divine counsel before they were born, or had done any good or evil. Both lay struggling alike in their mother's womb, when it was said, The elder shall serve the younger, without respect to good or bad works done or foreseen, that the purpose of God according to election might stand - that this great truth may be established, that God chooses some and refuses others as a free agent, by his own absolute and sovereign will, dispensing his favours or withholding them as he pleases. This difference that was put between Jacob and Esau he further illustrates by a quotation from Mal 1:2, Mal 1:3, where it is said, not of Jacob and Esau the person, but the Edomites and Israelites their posterity, Jacob have I loved, and Esau have I hated. The people of Israel were taken into the covenant of peculiarity, had the land of Canaan given them, were blessed with the more signal appearances of God for them in special protections, supplies, and deliverances, while the Edomites were rejected, had no temple, altar, priests, nor prophets - no such particular care taken of them nor kindness shown to them. Such a difference did God put between those two nations, that both descended from the loins of Abraham and Isaac, as at first there was a difference put between Jacob and Esau, the distinguishing heads of those two nations. So that all this choosing and refusing was typical, and intended to shadow forth some other election and rejection. (1.) Some understand it of the election and rejection of conditions or qualifications. As God chose Isaac and Jacob, and rejected Ishmael and Esau, so he might and did choose faith to be the condition of salvation and reject the works of the law. Thus Arminius understands it, De rejectis et assumptis talibus, certa qualitate notatis - Concerning such as are rejected and such as are chosen, being distinguished by appropriate qualities; so John Goodwin. But this very much strains the scripture; for the apostle speaks all along of persons, he has mercy on whom (he does not say on what kind of people) he will have mercy, besides that against this sense those two objections (Rom 9:14, Rom 9:19) do not at all arise, and his answer to them concerning God's absolute sovereignty over the children of men is not at all pertinent if no more be meant than his appointing the conditions of salvation. (2.) Others understand it of the election and rejection of particular person - some loved, and others hated, from eternity. But the apostle speaks of Jacob and Esau, not in their own persons, but as ancestors - Jacob the people, and Esau the people; nor does God condemn any, or decree so to do, merely because he will do it, without any reason taken from their own deserts. (3.) Others therefore understand it of the election and rejection of people considered complexly. His design is to justify God, and his mercy and truth, in calling the Gentiles, and taking them into the church, and into covenant with himself, while he suffered the obstinate part of the Jews to persist in unbelief, and so to unchurch themselves - thus hiding from their eyes the things that belonged to their peace. The apostle's reasoning for the explication and proof of this is, however, very applicable to, and, no doubt (as is usual in scripture) was intended for the clearing of the methods of God's grace towards particular person, for the communication of saving benefits bears some analogy to the communication of church-privileges. The choosing of Jacob the younger, and preferring him before Esau the elder (so crossing hands), were to intimate that the Jews, though the natural seed of Abraham, and the first-born of the church, should be laid aside; and the Gentiles, who were as the younger brother, should be taken in in their stead, and have the birthright and blessing. The Jews, considered as a body politic, a nation and people, knit together by the bond and cement of the ceremonial law, the temple and priesthood, the centre of their unity, had for many ages been the darlings and favourites of heaven, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation, dignified and distinguished by God's miraculous appearances among them and for them. Now that the gospel was preached, and Christian churches were planted, this national body was thereby abandoned, their church-polity dissolved; and Christian churches (and in process of time Christian nations), embodied in like manner, become their successors in the divine favour, and those special privileges and protections which were the products of that favour. To clear up the justice of God in this great dispensation is the scope of the apostle here.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–13. Public domain.
Copy as
AmbrosiasterAD 384
COMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
What Paul wants us to understand is that not all are worthy because they are children of Abraham, but only those who are children of the promise, that is, whom God foreknew would receive his promise, whether they are Jews or Gentiles.… Abraham believed and received Isaac on account of his faith, because he believed in God. By this the mystery of the future faith was indicated, that they would be brothers of Isaac who had the same faith by which Isaac was born, because Isaac was born as a type of the Savior by the promise. Thus whoever believes that Christ Jesus was promised to Abraham is a child of Abraham and a brother of Isaac. Abraham was told that all the nations would be blessed in his offspring. This happened not in Isaac, but in him who was promised to Abraham in Isaac, that is, Christ, in whom all the nations are blessed when they believe. Therefore the other Jews are children of the flesh, because they are deprived of the promise and cannot claim Abraham’s merit, because they do not follow the faith by which Abraham is counted worthy.
Diodorus of TarsusAD 390
PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul wants to say that it is not those who are of Abraham’s flesh who are his children, but those who are of the promise, who are godly and just, whom God promised according to his foreknowledge would be children of Abraham, just as Isaac was made righteous by the promise.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Romans 16
"Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children." Now when you come to know of what kind the seed of Abraham is, you will see that the promise is given to his seed, and know that the word hath not fallen to the ground. Of what kind, pray, is the seed then? It is no saying of mine, he means, but the Old Testament itself explains itself by saying as follows, "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." What is, "In Isaac?" Explain.
PelagiusAD 418
PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
Not all Jews are children of Abraham, but some still are; and if not all Israelites are from Israel, then some … are from the Gentiles. Even so, the sons of Abraham were named in Isaac alone and not in Ishmael, although he too descended from Abraham’s line.
Theodoret of CyrusAD 458
INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS
Although it was beyond the capacity of nature, Abraham became a father by divine generosity. Paul says this, even though Ishmael was also Abraham’s son and moreover, he was the firstborn. Therefore why do you boast, O Jew, that you are the only one to be descended from Abraham? For if you think that Ishmael does not count because he was the son of a slave, you are wrong. Holy Scripture reckons descent through the father and not through the mother. After all, the holy apostle could have mentioned the children born to Abraham through Keturah and shown that although they were born to a free woman they were not recognized as Abraham’s seed. It would also have been easy for Paul to show that the twelve sons of Jacob had different mothers, and four of them were the children of slaves, yet all of them belonged to Israel, and none of them was hurt by his mother’s slavery.… Here Paul wanted to insist that it was not the entire race of Abraham which received the blessing. Rather, only one of his sons was blessed, and the others were rejected.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 9:7 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.