Study This Verse
Commentary on Numbers 7 verses 10–89
We have here an account of the great solemnity of dedicating the altars, both that of burnt-offerings and that of incense; they had been sanctified before, when they were anointed (Lev 8:10, Lev 8:11), but now they were handselled, as it were, by the princes, with their free-will offerings. They began the use of them with rich presents, great expressions of joy and gladness, and extraordinary respect to those tokens of God's presence with them. Now observe here,
I. That the princes and great men were first and forwardest in the service of God. Those that are entitled to precedency should go before in good works, and that is true honour. Here is an example to the nobility and gentry, those that are in authority and of the first rank in their country; they ought to improve their honour and power, their estate and interest, for the promoting of religion, and the service of God, in the places where they live. It is justly expected that those who have more than others should do more good than others with what they have, else they are unfaithful stewards, and will not make up their account with joy. Nay, great men must not only with their wealth and power assist and protect those that serve God, but they must make conscience of being devout and religious themselves, and employing themselves in the exercises of piety, which will greatly redound to the honour of God (Psa 138:4, Psa 138:5), and have a good influence upon others, who will be the more easily persuaded to acts of devotion when they see them thus brought into reputation. It is certain that the greatest of men is less than the least of the ordinances of God; nor are the meanest services of religion any disparagement to those that make the greatest figure in the world.
II. The offerings they brought were very rich and valuable, so rich that some think there was not so great a difference in estate between them and others as that they were able to bear the expense of them themselves, but that the heads of each tribe contributed to the offering which their prince brought.
1.They brought some things to remain for standing service, twelve large silver dishes, each about sixty ounces weight, as many large silver cups, or bowls, of about thirty-five ounces - the former to be used for the meat-offerings, the latter for the drink-offerings - the former for the flesh of the sacrifices, the latter for the blood. The latter was God's table (as it were), and it was fit that so great a King should be served in plate. The golden spoons being filled with incense were intended, it is probable, for the service of the golden altar, for both the altars were anointed at the same time. Note, In works of piety and charity we ought to be generous according as our ability is. He that is the best should be served with the best we have. The Israelites indeed might well afford to part with their gold and silver in abundance to the service of the sanctuary, for they needed it not to buy meat and victual their camp, being daily fed with bread from heaven; nor did they need it to buy land, or pay their army, for they were shortly to be put in possession of Canaan.
2.They brought some things to be used immediately, offerings of each sort, burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, and a great many peace-offerings (on part of which they were to feast with their friends), and the meat-offerings that were to be annexed to them. Hereby they signified their thankful acceptance of, and cheerful submission to, all those laws concerning the sacrifices which God had lately by Moses delivered to them. And, though it was a time of joy and rejoicing, yet it is observable that still in the midst of their sacrifices we find a sin-offering. Since in our best services we are conscious to ourselves that there is a mixture of sin, it is fit that there should be even in our most joyful services a mixture of repentance. In all our approaches to God, we must by faith have an eye to Christ as the great sin-offering, and make mention of him.
3.They brought their offerings each on a separate day, in the order that they had been lately put into, so that the solemnity lasted twelve days. So God appointed (Num 7:11): They shall bring their offering, each prince on his day, and so they did. One sabbath must needs fall within the twelve days, if not two, but it should seem they did not intermit on the sabbath, for it was holy work, proper enough for a holy day. God appointed that it should thus be done on several days, (1.) That solemnity might be prolonged, and so might be universally taken notice of by all Israel, and the remembrance of it more effectually preserved. (2.) That an equal honour might thereby be put upon each tribe respectively; in Aaron's breast-plate each had his precious stone, so in this offering each had his day. (3.) Thus it would be done more decently and in order; God's work should not be done confusedly, and in a hurry; take time, and we shall have done the sooner, or at least we shall have done the better. (4.) God hereby signified how much pleased he is, and how much pleased we should be, with the exercises of piety and devotion. The repetition of them should be a continual pleasure to us, and we must not be weary of well doing. If extraordinary service be required to be done for twelve days together, we must not shrink from it, nor call it a task and a burden. (5.) The priests and Levites, having this occasion to offer the same sacrifices, and those some of every sort, every day, for so many days together, would have their hands well set in, and would be well versed in the laws concerning them. (6.) The peace-offerings were all to be eaten the same day they were offered, and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs, were enough for one day's festival; had there been more, especially if all had been brought on one day, there might have been danger of excess. The virtue of temperance must not be left, under pretence of the religion of feasting.
4.All their offerings were exactly the same, without any variation, though it is probable that neither the princes nor the tribes were all alike rich; but thus it was intimated that all the tribes of Israel had an equal share in the altar, and an equal interest in the sacrifices that were offered upon it. Though one tribe was posted more honourably in the camp than another, yet they and their services were all alike acceptable to God. Nor must we have faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect to persons, Jam 2:1.
5.Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, offered first, because God had given that tribe the first post of honour in the camp; and the rest of the tribes acquiesced, and offered in the same order in which God had appointed them to encamp. Judah, of which tribe Christ came, first, and then the rest; thus, in the dedication of souls to God, every man is presented in his own order, Christ the first-fruits, Co1 15:23. Some observe that Nahshon is the only one that is not expressly called a prince (Num 7:12), which the Jews give this account of: he is not called a prince, that he might not be puffed up because he offered first; and all the others are called princes because they (though some of them of the elder house) submitted, and offered after him. Or, because the title of prince of Judah did more properly belong to Christ, for unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
6.Though the offerings were all the same, yet the account of them is repeated at large for each tribe, in the same words. We are sure there are no vain repetitions in scripture; what then shall we make of these repetitions? Might it not have served to say of this noble jury that the same offering which their foreman brought each on his day brought likewise? No, God would have it specified for each tribe: and why so? (1.) It was for the encouragement of these princes, and of their respective tribes, that each of their offerings being recorded at large no slight might seem to be put upon them; for rich and poor meet together before God. (2.) It was for the encouragement of all generous acts of piety and charity, by letting us know that what is so given is lent to the Lord, and he carefully records it, with every one's name prefixed to his gift, because what is so given he will pay again, and even a cup of cold water shall have its reward. He is not unrighteous, to forget either the cost or the labour of love, Heb 6:10. We find Christ taking particular notice of what was cast into the treasury, Mar 12:41. Though what is offered be but little, though it be a contribution to the charity of others, yet if it be according to our ability it shall be recorded, that it may be recompensed in the resurrection of the just.
7.The sum total is added at the foot of the account (Num 7:84-88), to show how much God was pleased with the mention of his freewill-offerings, and what a great deal they amounted to in the whole, when every prince brought in his quota! How greatly would the sanctuary of God be enriched and beautified if all would in their places do their part towards it, by exemplary purity and devotion, extensive charity, and universal usefulness!
8.God signified his gracious acceptance of these presents that were brought him, by speaking familiarly to Moses, as a man speaks to his friend, from off the mercy-seat (Num 7:89, Num 12:8); and in speaking to him he did in effect speak to all Israel, showing them this token for good, Psa 103:7. Note, By this we may know that God hears and accepts our prayers if he gives us grace to hear and receive his word, for thus our communion with him is maintained and kept up. I know not why we may not suppose that upon each of the days on which these offerings were brought (probably while the priests and offerers were feasting upon the peace-offerings) Moses was in the tabernacle, receiving some of those laws and orders which we have already met with in this and the foregoing book. And here the excellent bishop Patrick observes that God's speaking to Moses thus by an audible articulate voice, as if he had been clothed with a holy body, might be looked upon as an earnest of the incarnation of the Son of God in the fulness of time, when the Word should be made flesh, and speak in the language of the sons of men. For, however God at sundry times and in divers manners spoke unto the fathers, he has in these last days spoken unto us by his Son. And that he who now spoke to Moses, as the shechinah or divine Majesty, from between the cherubim, was the eternal Word, the second person in the Trinity, was the pious conjecture of many of the ancients; for all God's communion with man is by his Son, by whom he made the world, and rules the church, and who is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.
Continue studying Numbers 7:51 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Numbers 7:51 meticulously details a specific portion of the dedication offering brought by Ahiezer, the leader of the tribe of Dan, for the newly consecrated Tabernacle. This verse, which is identically repeated for each of the twelve tribal princes, specifies the sacrificial animals required for a burnt offering: a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year. It underscores the precise and costly requirements for acceptable worship, highlighting the communal commitment to atonement and the structured obedience demanded by God for His people to approach His holy presence.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Numbers 7:51, when viewed within the larger framework of Numbers 7, primarily employs Enumeration and Repetition. The verse itself is a precise list of sacrificial animals, characteristic of the detailed legislative and narrative portions of the Pentateuch. This Enumeration provides clarity, ensures exact adherence to divine commands, and highlights the meticulousness required in Israelite worship. The most prominent literary device in the entire chapter is Repetition, as the exact same list of offerings, including the specific animals detailed in verse 51, is repeated verbatim for each of the twelve tribal leaders. This pervasive Repetition serves multiple functions: it powerfully emphasizes the unity and equality of the tribes before God, underscores the meticulousness and precision required in worship, highlights the comprehensive obedience demanded by the covenant, and reinforces the unchanging and non-negotiable nature of God's requirements for His people. Furthermore, there is profound Symbolism inherent in the animals themselves; the unblemished young bullock, ram, and lamb collectively symbolize purity, strength, and the immense costliness of sin and the necessary atonement, pointing to the need for a perfect and unblemished sacrifice to bridge the gap between a holy God and sinful humanity.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Numbers 7:51, as an integral part of the Tabernacle dedication, illuminates profound theological truths: the absolute holiness of God demanding precise and costly worship, humanity's pervasive need for atonement, and the principle of complete surrender. The burnt offering, entirely consumed by fire, symbolized total devotion, unreserved commitment, and the worshiper's fervent desire for reconciliation with a holy God. This act of worship, meticulously prescribed by divine command and uniformly performed by all tribes, underscored the communal nature of faith and the vital importance of unity in approaching God. It affirmed that access to God was not arbitrary or based on human preference but divinely ordained through specific sacrificial means designed to cleanse, propitiate, and reconcile, establishing a covenant relationship.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Numbers 7:51, though detailing an ancient ritual from a distant past, offers profound and enduring insights for contemporary believers. The meticulousness with which God prescribed the offerings reminds us that our worship is not merely an emotional experience or a casual endeavor, but an act of intentional obedience, profound reverence, and deep respect towards a holy and sovereign God. The concept of the burnt offering—total consumption, complete surrender, holding nothing back—challenges us to deeply consider the depth and sincerity of our own devotion. Are we truly offering our entire lives as a "living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God," as Paul powerfully exhorts in Romans 12:1? Are there areas of our lives, our time, our resources, or our ambitions that we are withholding from His Lordship? This passage also powerfully underscores the communal aspect of faith; just as all tribes brought identical offerings, demonstrating their unity and shared commitment, we are called to unified worship and service within the body of Christ. Our individual acts of devotion, when offered in concert with fellow believers, contribute to the collective witness and bring greater glory to God's name. Ultimately, the inherent need for these costly and repeated sacrifices points to our inherent sinfulness and the absolute necessity of atonement, directing our gaze to the perfect and final sacrifice that alone makes true and lasting reconciliation possible.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why were specific animals required for the burnt offering, as seen in Numbers 7:51?
Answer: The requirement for specific animals (a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year) for the burnt offering was rooted in several crucial factors within the Mosaic Law. First, it emphasized the value and costliness of the sacrifice. These animals were valuable commodities, representing a significant economic loss to the offerer, thereby demonstrating the sincerity, seriousness, and devotion of their act of worship to God. Second, it ensured the purity and unblemished nature of the offering. Animals "of the first year" or "without blemish" were considered perfect and fit to be presented to a holy God, symbolizing the purity and moral integrity required for atonement and divine acceptance. Third, the specific types of animals often carried symbolic weight within the Israelite culture and the broader sacrificial system, each contributing to the comprehensive nature of the offering. For instance, the bullock often represented strength and the highest value, while the lamb symbolized innocence and purity. This adherence to specific types was part of God's precise and non-negotiable instructions, ensuring that worship was conducted according to His divine will and not human preference, as extensively detailed in books like Leviticus.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Numbers 7:51, with its detailed description of the burnt offering—a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year—finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. These Old Testament sacrifices, costly and meticulously prescribed, collectively prefigure the singular, unblemished, and infinitely valuable sacrifice of the Lamb of God Himself. While the Old Testament burnt offering symbolized complete surrender and provided temporary atonement, it was inherently imperfect and had to be repeated continually because "it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins" (Hebrews 10:4). Christ, however, offered Himself "once for all" (Hebrews 10:10), a perfect, voluntary, and complete self-offering that truly and eternally atoned for sin and perfectly pleased God the Father. His sacrifice was not merely a symbol but the very reality of a life wholly consecrated to God, a "fragrant offering and sacrifice to God" (Ephesians 5:2). Through His finished work on the cross, believers are made righteous and gain direct, unhindered access to God, fulfilling the Tabernacle's purpose and the burnt offering's deepest meaning of reconciliation, complete devotion, and eternal acceptance.