Numbers 7:39

Translation
King James Version
One young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
One H259 young H1241 bullock H6499, one H259 ram H352, one H259 lamb H3532 of the first H1121 year H8141, for a burnt offering H5930:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
one young bull, one ram, one male lamb in its first year as a burnt offering,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
one young bull, one ram, and one male lamb a year old for a burnt offering;
Ask
American Standard Version
one young bullock, one ram, one he-lamb a year old, for a burnt-offering;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
one young bull, one ram, one male lamb a year old, for a burnt offering;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
A yong bullocke, a ram, a lambe of a yeere olde for a burnt offring,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
one bullock, a son of the herd, one ram, one lamb, a son of a year, for a burnt-offering;
Ask
See also
Exodus 12:5Acts 8:32Revelation 5:6John 1:291 Peter 1:19
In the KJVVerse 3,890 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 7:39 precisely details a specific component of the dedication offerings presented by Gamaliel, the leader of the tribe of Manasseh, for the newly consecrated Tabernacle. This verse enumerates the animals—a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year—designated for the burnt offering, an act symbolizing complete surrender, atonement, and fervent devotion to God. It is an integral part of the highly structured and repetitive account in Numbers chapter 7, which collectively underscores the divine demand for precision, the unity in Israelite worship, and the profound significance of total dedication to the Lord's dwelling place.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 7:39 is embedded within a meticulously structured and lengthy narrative in Numbers chapter 7, which chronicles the dedication offerings brought by the twelve tribal leaders for the newly erected Tabernacle and its sacred implements. This chapter immediately follows the anointing of the Tabernacle and its altar, as explicitly commanded by God in Numbers 7:1. For twelve consecutive days, each tribal leader presented an identical set of gifts, a literary device that powerfully emphasizes uniformity, shared devotion, and the collective participation of the entire nation in this foundational act of worship. Numbers 7:39 specifically outlines the components of the burnt offering presented by Gamaliel, the son of Pedahzur, on the seventh day. The deliberate repetition throughout the chapter, detailing the exact same offerings from each tribe, serves to highlight the meticulous obedience required in Israelite worship and the unified commitment of the nation to God's presence dwelling among them.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The events described in Numbers chapter 7 unfold shortly after the completion and anointing of the Tabernacle, a momentous occasion in Israel's history as they prepared for their journey through the wilderness. The Tabernacle was not merely a tent but God's designated dwelling place among His people, symbolizing His holy presence and providing the prescribed means for worship, communion, and atonement. The offerings, including the burnt offering specified in Numbers 7:39, were far more than ceremonial gifts; they were essential acts of consecration, dedicating the sacred space and its instruments for divine service. These sacrifices were foundational to the Israelite covenant relationship with God, establishing a framework for approaching a holy God. The particular animals—a young bullock, a ram, and a lamb of the first year—were standard sacrificial animals, carefully chosen for their purity and unblemished state. Their selection underscored the principle that only the finest and most perfect was acceptable for God's service, a requirement detailed extensively in sacrificial laws such as those found in Leviticus 1.
  • Key Themes: Numbers 7:39 contributes significantly to several overarching theological and narrative themes within the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch. The primary theme is Divine Precision and Order, evident in the meticulous detail with which God prescribes every aspect of the Tabernacle, its furnishings, and the offerings. This precision underscores God's holiness and His demand for an ordered, reverent approach to His presence. Another key theme is Corporate Worship and Unity, as all twelve tribes, through their leaders, bring identical offerings, signifying their collective commitment and shared identity as God's covenant people. This uniformity reinforces the idea that all Israel stands united before God. Furthermore, the passage highlights the theme of Atonement and Dedication. The burnt offering, in particular, symbolizes complete surrender and a general atonement for sin, making the worshiper acceptable before God. This act of giving one's best, as seen in the valuable animals specified in Numbers 7:39, emphasizes the profound cost and commitment involved in drawing near to a holy God, a theme foundational to the entire sacrificial system outlined in Leviticus.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • One (Hebrew, ʼechâd', H259): This numeral (H259) signifies "united" or "one," emphasizing the singularity and specific quantity of each animal required for the offering. In the context of the dedication, it highlights the precise nature of God's commands—not just any number, but exactly "one" of each type, underscoring the divine order and the meticulous adherence expected from the worshipers.
  • Bullock (Hebrew, par', H6499): This term (H6499) refers to a young bull, specifically a male calf. The Strong's data suggests it is "apparently as breaking forth in wild strength," or "perhaps as dividing the hoof." Its inclusion signifies a valuable and substantial offering, representing a significant sacrifice from the worshiper's herd. It indicates the giving of one's best and most costly possessions to God.
  • Lamb (Hebrew, kebes', H3532): This word (H3532) denotes a ram, specifically one "just old enough to butt." It refers to a young male sheep, often associated with purity and innocence. The phrase "lamb of the first year" (incorporating H1121 bên for "of the first" and H8141 shâneh for "year") further specifies its youth and unblemished quality, making it an ideal candidate for sacrifice due to its purity and lack of defect.
  • Burnt Offering (Hebrew, ʻôlâh', H5930): This term (H5930) literally means "that which ascends" or "goes up." It describes a specific type of sacrifice where the entire animal (except for the hide, which went to the priest in some cases) was consumed by fire on the altar, with the smoke ascending to God. This symbolized complete dedication, total surrender, and a general atonement for unintentional sins, making the worshiper acceptable before the Lord through a demonstration of fervent devotion.

Verse Breakdown

  • "One young bullock": This specifies the largest and most valuable animal in this particular offering set. A "young bullock" (Hebrew: par ben baqar) indicates a male calf that is mature enough to be a significant offering, signifying a substantial and costly sacrifice. Its inclusion highlights the worshiper's willingness to give generously and sacrificially to God, offering a prized possession.
  • "one ram": This refers to a male sheep, another significant animal in the pastoral economy of ancient Israel. Its presence alongside the bullock reinforces the comprehensive nature of the offering, drawing from different categories of valuable livestock and demonstrating a holistic commitment.
  • "one lamb of the first year": This denotes a young, pure, and unblemished male lamb, specifically one within its first year of life. This age requirement emphasizes purity, innocence, and lack of defect, which were crucial for an acceptable offering to a holy God. Its inclusion foreshadows the ultimate perfect sacrifice that would embody these qualities.
  • "for a burnt offering": This concluding clause explicitly states the purpose of these animals. They were designated for the ‘ōlāh, the sacrifice entirely consumed by fire on the altar. This type of offering symbolized complete dedication, total surrender of the worshiper's self or possessions, and a general atonement for sin, signifying acceptance and reconciliation with God.

Literary Devices

Numbers 7:39, when viewed within its broader literary context of chapter 7, employs several significant literary devices that amplify its meaning. The most prominent is Repetition, as the detailed list of offerings, including the items in this verse, is meticulously repeated for each of the twelve tribal leaders. This Repetition serves to underscore the uniformity of divine command, the unity of the tribes in their worship, and the meticulous nature of God's requirements for approaching Him. It also emphasizes the importance and value of each component of the offering. Symbolism is inherent in the animals themselves: the unblemished bullock, ram, and lamb symbolize purity, value, and the best of the worshiper's possessions, signifying that only the perfect and most valuable is fitting for God. The "burnt offering" itself is a powerful Symbol of complete surrender, total dedication, and atonement, as the entire offering ascends to God in smoke, representing the worshiper's devotion. Furthermore, the detailed prescription of these offerings, while literal in their immediate context, functions as Typology, foreshadowing the ultimate, perfect sacrifice that would fully and finally atone for sin, establishing a divine pattern for future redemption.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 7:39, as an integral part of the Tabernacle dedication offerings, powerfully articulates the enduring theological principles of divine precision, complete dedication, and the necessity of atonement. The meticulous detail in God's commands for worship underscores His absolute holiness and the profound reverence due to Him. The burnt offering, which was entirely consumed, symbolizes total surrender and the giving of one's absolute best to God—a principle that transcends the Old Testament sacrificial system and resonates throughout biblical theology. This act of atonement, designed to make the worshiper acceptable before a holy God, profoundly points forward to a greater, more perfect sacrifice that would provide ultimate and complete reconciliation for all humanity.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While the specific practice of animal sacrifice is no longer required for believers in Christ, Numbers 7:39 and its broader context offer profound and enduring principles for our spiritual lives and our approach to God. The meticulousness with which God prescribed these offerings teaches us that our worship and service to Him should be intentional, thoughtful, and offered with our very best, not as an afterthought or with half-hearted effort. It calls us to a standard of excellence in our devotion. The concept of the burnt offering, symbolizing complete surrender and dedication, challenges us to examine the extent of our own commitment to God. Are we holding anything back—any area of our lives, any resource, any ambition—or are we truly presenting our whole selves—our time, talents, resources, and desires—as a "living sacrifice" to Him? This passage calls us to a life of holistic devotion, recognizing that true worship involves not just ritual but a transformed heart and obedient living, reflecting the complete surrender symbolized by the ascending smoke of the offering. It reminds us that our entire lives are meant to be an offering of praise and obedience to the One who has given us everything.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life am I holding back from complete surrender to God, rather than offering my "best" as a burnt offering?
  • How does the meticulous detail of God's requirements for the Tabernacle offerings inform my approach to worship and obedience today?
  • Considering the symbolism of the burnt offering, what does it mean for me to "present my body as a living sacrifice" in a practical, daily sense, and what might that look like this week?

FAQ

Why were specific animals like a young bullock, ram, and lamb of the first year required for the burnt offering?

Answer: The specific animals were chosen for several profound reasons, reflecting divine instruction and deep symbolic meaning. Firstly, they were considered "clean" animals suitable for sacrifice according to Mosaic Law, as extensively detailed in Leviticus 1. Secondly, they had to be "unblemished" or "without defect," signifying the purity and perfection required for an offering to a holy God. This emphasized the exceedingly high standard God set for approaching Him and underscored His own perfect character. Thirdly, the varying sizes and values of the animals (a bullock being the most valuable, then a ram, then a lamb) allowed for different levels of sacrifice based on a worshiper's means, while still requiring the "best" of what they possessed. The "lamb of the first year" specifically highlighted purity, innocence, and newness of life, serving as a powerful foreshadowing of the ultimate, perfect sacrifice to come.

What was the primary purpose of the burnt offering in ancient Israelite worship?

Answer: The primary purpose of the burnt offering (‘ōlāh) was multifaceted and deeply significant. It was fundamentally an act of complete dedication and devotion to God, symbolizing the worshiper's total surrender and commitment, as the entire animal (except for the hide in some cases) was consumed by fire and ascended as smoke to God. This act represented the worshiper's desire to be wholly given over to the Lord. It also served as a general atonement for unintentional sins, making the worshiper acceptable before the Lord and restoring fellowship. While other sacrifices addressed specific sins or offered thanksgiving, the burnt offering had a broader atoning quality, covering general sinfulness and re-establishing a right relationship between the worshiper and God. It was also offered in communal settings for the nation's atonement and dedication, as powerfully demonstrated in the Tabernacle dedication described in Numbers 7.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Numbers 7:39, with its meticulous description of the burnt offering—comprising a "young bullock, one ram, one lamb of the first year"—finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the person and work of Jesus Christ. These prescribed animals, unblemished and offered in complete consumption, all point to the singular, infinitely valuable, and utterly perfect sacrifice of the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world. Just as the burnt offering symbolized complete surrender and dedication, Jesus offered Himself entirely, without reservation or blemish, on the cross. His sacrifice was not merely a partial offering but a total, once-for-all atonement for the sins of humanity, rendering all subsequent animal sacrifices obsolete and perfectly fulfilling the Law's requirements (Hebrews 10:10-14). The ascending smoke of the ‘ōlāh symbolized acceptance before God; similarly, Christ's perfect obedience, sinless life, and sacrificial death were supremely acceptable to the Father, securing our eternal redemption and granting us access to God. Through His finished work, we are now invited to present our lives as "living sacrifices" (Romans 12:1), not to earn salvation, but in grateful response to the complete and perfect offering of our Lord Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfilled every shadow and type of the Old Testament sacrificial system.

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 7 verses 10–89

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an account of the great solemnity of dedicating the altars, both that of burnt-offerings and that of incense; they had been sanctified before, when they were anointed (Lev 8:10, Lev 8:11), but now they were handselled, as it were, by the princes, with their free-will offerings. They began the use of them with rich presents, great expressions of joy and gladness, and extraordinary respect to those tokens of God's presence with them. Now observe here,

I. That the princes and great men were first and forwardest in the service of God. Those that are entitled to precedency should go before in good works, and that is true honour. Here is an example to the nobility and gentry, those that are in authority and of the first rank in their country; they ought to improve their honour and power, their estate and interest, for the promoting of religion, and the service of God, in the places where they live. It is justly expected that those who have more than others should do more good than others with what they have, else they are unfaithful stewards, and will not make up their account with joy. Nay, great men must not only with their wealth and power assist and protect those that serve God, but they must make conscience of being devout and religious themselves, and employing themselves in the exercises of piety, which will greatly redound to the honour of God (Psa 138:4, Psa 138:5), and have a good influence upon others, who will be the more easily persuaded to acts of devotion when they see them thus brought into reputation. It is certain that the greatest of men is less than the least of the ordinances of God; nor are the meanest services of religion any disparagement to those that make the greatest figure in the world.

II. The offerings they brought were very rich and valuable, so rich that some think there was not so great a difference in estate between them and others as that they were able to bear the expense of them themselves, but that the heads of each tribe contributed to the offering which their prince brought.

1.They brought some things to remain for standing service, twelve large silver dishes, each about sixty ounces weight, as many large silver cups, or bowls, of about thirty-five ounces - the former to be used for the meat-offerings, the latter for the drink-offerings - the former for the flesh of the sacrifices, the latter for the blood. The latter was God's table (as it were), and it was fit that so great a King should be served in plate. The golden spoons being filled with incense were intended, it is probable, for the service of the golden altar, for both the altars were anointed at the same time. Note, In works of piety and charity we ought to be generous according as our ability is. He that is the best should be served with the best we have. The Israelites indeed might well afford to part with their gold and silver in abundance to the service of the sanctuary, for they needed it not to buy meat and victual their camp, being daily fed with bread from heaven; nor did they need it to buy land, or pay their army, for they were shortly to be put in possession of Canaan.

2.They brought some things to be used immediately, offerings of each sort, burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, and a great many peace-offerings (on part of which they were to feast with their friends), and the meat-offerings that were to be annexed to them. Hereby they signified their thankful acceptance of, and cheerful submission to, all those laws concerning the sacrifices which God had lately by Moses delivered to them. And, though it was a time of joy and rejoicing, yet it is observable that still in the midst of their sacrifices we find a sin-offering. Since in our best services we are conscious to ourselves that there is a mixture of sin, it is fit that there should be even in our most joyful services a mixture of repentance. In all our approaches to God, we must by faith have an eye to Christ as the great sin-offering, and make mention of him.

3.They brought their offerings each on a separate day, in the order that they had been lately put into, so that the solemnity lasted twelve days. So God appointed (Num 7:11): They shall bring their offering, each prince on his day, and so they did. One sabbath must needs fall within the twelve days, if not two, but it should seem they did not intermit on the sabbath, for it was holy work, proper enough for a holy day. God appointed that it should thus be done on several days, (1.) That solemnity might be prolonged, and so might be universally taken notice of by all Israel, and the remembrance of it more effectually preserved. (2.) That an equal honour might thereby be put upon each tribe respectively; in Aaron's breast-plate each had his precious stone, so in this offering each had his day. (3.) Thus it would be done more decently and in order; God's work should not be done confusedly, and in a hurry; take time, and we shall have done the sooner, or at least we shall have done the better. (4.) God hereby signified how much pleased he is, and how much pleased we should be, with the exercises of piety and devotion. The repetition of them should be a continual pleasure to us, and we must not be weary of well doing. If extraordinary service be required to be done for twelve days together, we must not shrink from it, nor call it a task and a burden. (5.) The priests and Levites, having this occasion to offer the same sacrifices, and those some of every sort, every day, for so many days together, would have their hands well set in, and would be well versed in the laws concerning them. (6.) The peace-offerings were all to be eaten the same day they were offered, and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs, were enough for one day's festival; had there been more, especially if all had been brought on one day, there might have been danger of excess. The virtue of temperance must not be left, under pretence of the religion of feasting.

4.All their offerings were exactly the same, without any variation, though it is probable that neither the princes nor the tribes were all alike rich; but thus it was intimated that all the tribes of Israel had an equal share in the altar, and an equal interest in the sacrifices that were offered upon it. Though one tribe was posted more honourably in the camp than another, yet they and their services were all alike acceptable to God. Nor must we have faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect to persons, Jam 2:1.

5.Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, offered first, because God had given that tribe the first post of honour in the camp; and the rest of the tribes acquiesced, and offered in the same order in which God had appointed them to encamp. Judah, of which tribe Christ came, first, and then the rest; thus, in the dedication of souls to God, every man is presented in his own order, Christ the first-fruits, Co1 15:23. Some observe that Nahshon is the only one that is not expressly called a prince (Num 7:12), which the Jews give this account of: he is not called a prince, that he might not be puffed up because he offered first; and all the others are called princes because they (though some of them of the elder house) submitted, and offered after him. Or, because the title of prince of Judah did more properly belong to Christ, for unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

6.Though the offerings were all the same, yet the account of them is repeated at large for each tribe, in the same words. We are sure there are no vain repetitions in scripture; what then shall we make of these repetitions? Might it not have served to say of this noble jury that the same offering which their foreman brought each on his day brought likewise? No, God would have it specified for each tribe: and why so? (1.) It was for the encouragement of these princes, and of their respective tribes, that each of their offerings being recorded at large no slight might seem to be put upon them; for rich and poor meet together before God. (2.) It was for the encouragement of all generous acts of piety and charity, by letting us know that what is so given is lent to the Lord, and he carefully records it, with every one's name prefixed to his gift, because what is so given he will pay again, and even a cup of cold water shall have its reward. He is not unrighteous, to forget either the cost or the labour of love, Heb 6:10. We find Christ taking particular notice of what was cast into the treasury, Mar 12:41. Though what is offered be but little, though it be a contribution to the charity of others, yet if it be according to our ability it shall be recorded, that it may be recompensed in the resurrection of the just.

7.The sum total is added at the foot of the account (Num 7:84-88), to show how much God was pleased with the mention of his freewill-offerings, and what a great deal they amounted to in the whole, when every prince brought in his quota! How greatly would the sanctuary of God be enriched and beautified if all would in their places do their part towards it, by exemplary purity and devotion, extensive charity, and universal usefulness!

8.God signified his gracious acceptance of these presents that were brought him, by speaking familiarly to Moses, as a man speaks to his friend, from off the mercy-seat (Num 7:89, Num 12:8); and in speaking to him he did in effect speak to all Israel, showing them this token for good, Psa 103:7. Note, By this we may know that God hears and accepts our prayers if he gives us grace to hear and receive his word, for thus our communion with him is maintained and kept up. I know not why we may not suppose that upon each of the days on which these offerings were brought (probably while the priests and offerers were feasting upon the peace-offerings) Moses was in the tabernacle, receiving some of those laws and orders which we have already met with in this and the foregoing book. And here the excellent bishop Patrick observes that God's speaking to Moses thus by an audible articulate voice, as if he had been clothed with a holy body, might be looked upon as an earnest of the incarnation of the Son of God in the fulness of time, when the Word should be made flesh, and speak in the language of the sons of men. For, however God at sundry times and in divers manners spoke unto the fathers, he has in these last days spoken unto us by his Son. And that he who now spoke to Moses, as the shechinah or divine Majesty, from between the cherubim, was the eternal Word, the second person in the Trinity, was the pious conjecture of many of the ancients; for all God's communion with man is by his Son, by whom he made the world, and rules the church, and who is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–89. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 7:39 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.