Numbers 7:13

Translation
King James Version
And his offering was one silver charger, the weight thereof was an hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them were full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And his offering H7133 was one H259 silver H3701 charger H7086, the weight H4948 thereof was an hundred H3967 and thirty H7970 shekels, one H259 silver H3701 bowl H4219 of seventy H7657 shekels H8255, after the shekel H8255 of the sanctuary H6944; both H8147 of them were full H4392 of fine flour H5560 mingled H1101 with oil H8081 for a meat offering H4503:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
He offered one silver dish weighing 130 shekels [three-and-a-quarter pounds] and one silver basin of seventy shekels (using the sanctuary shekel) [one-and-three-quarters pounds], both full of fine flour mixed with olive oil for a grain offering;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
His offering was one silver platter weighing a hundred and thirty shekels, and one silver bowl weighing seventy shekels, both according to the sanctuary shekel and filled with fine flour mixed with oil for a grain offering;
Ask
American Standard Version
and his oblation was one silver platter, the weight whereof was a hundred and thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meal-offering;
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
and his offering was: one silver platter, the weight of which was one hundred thirty shekels, one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of fine flour mixed with oil for a meal offering;
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And his offring was a siluer charger of an hundreth and thirtie shekels weight, a siluer boule of seuenty shekels, after the shekel of the Sanctuarie, both ful of fine floure, mingled with oyle, for a meate offring,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And his offering is one silver dish, its weight a hundred and thirty shekels ; one silver bowl of seventy shekels, by the shekel of the sanctuary; both of them full of flour mixed with oil, for a present;
Ask
See also
Exodus 30:13Leviticus 2:1Exodus 37:16Exodus 25:291 Kings 7:45Ezra 1:9Ezra 1:10
In the KJVVerse 3,864 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 7:13 meticulously details the inaugural offering presented by Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, on the first day of the Tabernacle's dedication. This verse, embedded within a comprehensive account of similar tribal contributions, precisely enumerates the gifts: a substantial silver charger weighing 130 shekels and a silver bowl of 70 shekels, both measured according to the precise "shekel of the sanctuary," and filled with fine flour blended with oil, designated as a grain offering. It underscores the Israelites' unwavering obedience to divine mandates, the profound value ascribed to reverent worship, and the foundational principle of uncompromised integrity in all sacred and communal interactions.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers chapter 7 presents an extraordinarily detailed and highly repetitive record of the dedication offerings brought by the twelve tribal leaders of Israel following the completion and anointing of the Tabernacle. This chapter immediately follows the detailed instructions for the Tabernacle's construction in Exodus 25-40 and its subsequent anointing and setting up, as described in Exodus 40:1-33. Numbers 7 meticulously chronicles the ceremonial gifts presented over twelve consecutive days, with Nahshon, representing the tribe of Judah, initiating these offerings on the first day (Numbers 7:12-17). The extensive repetition of identical offerings for each tribe serves multiple crucial purposes: it powerfully emphasizes the unity and collective participation of all tribes in their worship, highlights their corporate obedience to God's specific commands, and underscores the immense significance of the Tabernacle as the consecrated dwelling place of God among His chosen people. The meticulous detail, down to the precise weights and contents of each vessel, profoundly reinforces God's demand for precision, order, and reverence in worship, reflecting His inherently holy and orderly character.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The dedication of the Tabernacle was a monumental event in Israel's early history, signifying the formal establishment of a central, portable sanctuary for divine worship and the tangible manifestation of God's presence among them after their miraculous exodus from Egypt. The offerings detailed in Numbers 7 were not obligatory sin offerings, but rather voluntary contributions of dedication, thanksgiving, and support for the maintenance and operations of the sacred space and its priestly services. The tribal leaders, acting as representatives of their respective communities, brought gifts of considerable value, such as the silver vessels mentioned in Numbers 7:13, which reflected the collective wealth and resources of the Israelite nation. The critical phrase "after the shekel of the sanctuary" refers to a meticulously standardized weight, likely a physical standard maintained by the Levitical priests at the Tabernacle. This standard was crucial for ensuring consistency, preventing fraud, and upholding integrity in all religious transactions and, by extension, in commercial dealings, thereby reinforcing the divine expectation of honesty and uprightness. This principle resonates deeply with similar injunctions found in Leviticus 27:25 and later echoed in wisdom literature like Proverbs 11:1. The "meat offering" (KJV) is more accurately understood as a "grain offering" or "meal offering" (Hebrew: minchah), a bloodless offering typically composed of fine flour, oil, and sometimes frankincense, often accompanied by a drink offering. This type of offering symbolized thanksgiving, devotion, and a profound acknowledgment of God's bountiful provision, as comprehensively outlined in Leviticus 2.
  • Key Themes: Numbers 7 and the broader narrative it belongs to contribute significantly to several key theological and narrative themes. Foremost among these is the theme of Divine Presence and Dwelling, as the Tabernacle's dedication signifies God's tangible decision to reside among His people, fulfilling promises made to Abraham and Moses. Closely related is the theme of Obedience and Covenant Faithfulness, demonstrated by the Israelites' meticulous adherence to God's detailed instructions for the Tabernacle's construction and its subsequent dedication. The precise nature of the offerings, particularly the "shekel of the sanctuary," highlights the theme of Integrity and Holiness in Worship, emphasizing that worship must be pure, honest, and offered according to God's standards, not human whim. The voluntary and costly nature of the gifts underscores the theme of Generosity and Sacrificial Giving, reflecting a heart of devotion and gratitude for God's provision and covenant relationship. Finally, the repetitive offerings by each tribal leader reinforce the theme of Unity and Corporate Worship, demonstrating that despite their distinct identities, all tribes were united in their commitment to the central worship of Yahweh. These themes collectively paint a picture of a people being shaped by their encounter with a holy God, learning to live in His presence according to His righteous decrees.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • offering (Hebrew, qorbân', H7133): This term, derived from a root meaning "to bring near," specifically refers to something brought near the altar as a sacrificial present or oblation. In the context of the Tabernacle dedication, it signifies a voluntary gift presented to God, emphasizing the act of drawing near to the divine presence through an act of worship and dedication. It encompasses the entirety of the gifts brought by the tribal leaders, highlighting their purpose as sacred contributions.
  • charger (Hebrew, qᵉʻârâh', H7086): This word denotes a large, deep dish or platter, likely designed with a hollowed-out shape. In this verse, it serves as a substantial vessel specifically intended to hold a significant quantity of the grain offering. Its considerable weight of 130 shekels, combined with its silver composition, underscores the generous and valuable nature of the gift, signifying the best of what the people had to offer to God.
  • mingled (Hebrew, bâlal', H1101): A primitive root, bâlal signifies the act of mixing or blending, often specifically with oil, and can also imply anointing. In the context of the grain offering, it describes the process of combining fine flour with oil, creating a unified and prepared offering. This mingling was not merely practical but symbolic, as oil represented anointing, blessing, and the Spirit, enriching the flour (representing sustenance) and preparing it for sacred presentation.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And his offering [was] one silver charger, the weight thereof [was] an hundred and thirty [shekels],": This opening clause introduces the first significant component of Nahshon's inaugural dedication gift: a single, substantial platter crafted from silver. The precise weight of 130 shekels (approximately 3.25 pounds or 1.5 kilograms, depending on the exact shekel standard) is meticulously noted, immediately conveying the considerable intrinsic value and the generous scale of this sacred contribution. The use of silver itself suggests purity, preciousness, and a fitting material for a gift presented to the holy God.
  • "one silver bowl of seventy shekels, after the shekel of the sanctuary;": This segment details the second silver vessel, a bowl, weighing 70 shekels (approximately 1.75 pounds or 0.8 kilograms). The critical phrase "after the shekel of the sanctuary" is paramount, indicating that the weights of these vessels were not arbitrary but conformed to a divinely ordained, precise, and standardized measurement maintained by the priests at the Tabernacle. This ensured absolute consistency, fairness, and uncompromising integrity in all sacred transactions, reflecting God's demand for exactness and truth in worship.
  • "both of them [were] full of fine flour mingled with oil for a meat offering:": This concluding clause specifies the contents of both the silver charger and the silver bowl. They were entirely filled with "fine flour mingled with oil," which constituted the "meat offering" (more accurately translated as a "grain offering" or minchah). This combination of fine flour (representing the best of human labor, sustenance, and the fruit of the land) and oil (symbolizing anointing, blessing, and the presence of the Holy Spirit) signifies a rich offering of thanksgiving, dedication, and acknowledgment of God as the ultimate source of all provision and life. It was a bloodless offering, emphasizing devotion and communion rather than atonement.

Literary Devices

Numbers 7:13, as part of the broader chapter, masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its profound message. Precision and Detailing are paramount, evident in the meticulous enumeration of exact weights, materials, and contents for each offering. This serves not only as a historical record but also as a theological statement, emphasizing God's demand for absolute exactness, order, and reverence in all matters of worship and covenant relationship. Symbolism is deeply embedded within the elements of the offering: silver inherently symbolizes purity, value, and redemption; the fine flour represents the best of human labor, sustenance, and God's bountiful provision; and the oil signifies anointing, blessing, and the pervasive presence of the Holy Spirit. The very act of offering, repeated twelve times throughout the chapter, utilizes Repetition to underscore the unity of the tribes in their shared devotion and their collective, unwavering commitment to God's newly established dwelling place among them. This repetition also highlights the enduring significance and unchanging nature of God's requirements for worship.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 7:13 offers profound insights into several enduring theological principles. It vividly illustrates the critical importance of obedience to divine commands, as the offerings strictly adhere to God's prescribed standards for the Tabernacle's dedication. The explicit mention of the "shekel of the sanctuary" powerfully underscores God's unwavering demand for integrity and honesty in all dealings, whether sacred or secular, reflecting His own unchanging, righteous, and truthful character. The substantial value of the silver vessels and the use of the finest ingredients for the grain offering highlight the principle of giving our best to God, emphasizing that worship should be costly, not in a burdensome sense, but as an expression of profound reverence and gratitude, offering not merely convenience or leftovers. This act of giving also profoundly signifies dedication and thanksgiving, acknowledging God as the ultimate provider and sustainer of all life. Furthermore, the communal nature of these offerings, though presented individually by tribal leaders, points to the collective responsibility of God's people to support His dwelling place and participate in His worship, fostering a sense of corporate identity and purpose.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Numbers 7:13, while rooted in an ancient ritual, provides timeless and deeply relevant lessons for contemporary believers. The meticulous detail in God's instructions for the Tabernacle offerings serves as a powerful reminder that our worship and service to Him should be intentional, thoughtfully prepared, and offered with profound reverence, rather than being haphazard or perfunctory. Just as the Israelites were commanded to bring their finest and measure their gifts by a divinely established standard, we are called to give our absolute best to God—extending beyond mere financial contributions to encompass our time, our unique talents, our deepest affections, and our very lives. The "shekel of the sanctuary" stands as a potent metaphor for the unwavering call to integrity in every facet of our existence. It challenges us to cultivate a life marked by honesty, truthfulness, and transparency in our personal relationships, our professional conduct, and our spiritual commitments, thereby reflecting God's unchanging and righteous character to a world desperately in need of authentic witness. Moreover, the grain offering's profound symbolism of thanksgiving for God's provision should cultivate within us a perpetual heart of gratitude, consistently recognizing God as the benevolent source of all blessings, sustenance, and grace in our lives.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my life am I currently called to give my "best" to God, moving beyond traditional monetary contributions?
  • How does the enduring principle of the "shekel of the sanctuary" challenge me to live with greater integrity, honesty, and ethical precision in my daily interactions and decisions?
  • What does my current approach to personal and corporate worship, as well as my service, reveal about my understanding of God's holiness and His desire for intentionality and excellence?
  • How can I actively cultivate a deeper and more consistent sense of gratitude for God's abundant provision, even amidst challenging circumstances or seasons of scarcity?

FAQ

What was the purpose of such detailed and seemingly repetitive instructions for the Tabernacle offerings in Numbers 7?

Answer: The detailed and highly repetitive instructions found in Numbers 7, including the specific items enumerated in Numbers 7:13, served several crucial and interconnected purposes within the divine economy. Firstly, they powerfully emphasized God's demand for absolute precision, order, and reverence in worship, reflecting His holy, unchanging, and perfectly ordered character. Every aspect of the Tabernacle's construction and its subsequent service was to be executed "according to the pattern" revealed to Moses on Mount Sinai (Exodus 25:9). Secondly, the extensive repetition of identical offerings, presented by each tribal leader, underscored the profound unity and shared commitment of all twelve tribes to God's dwelling place among them. It visually demonstrated their collective obedience and corporate dedication to the covenant. Finally, the specific enumeration of valuable items like the silver vessels and the finest flour highlighted the immense worth and sacredness of the Tabernacle and its offerings. This taught the Israelites that their worship should be costly—not as a burden, but as a heartfelt expression of their reverence for the Almighty and His sacred presence among them, reflecting a devotion that was both profound and tangible.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Numbers 7:13, with its meticulous description of the offerings brought for the Tabernacle's dedication, finds its ultimate fulfillment and most profound meaning in the person and work of Jesus Christ. The Tabernacle itself, divinely designed as a temporary dwelling place for God among His people, was a profound shadow and prototype of the true and perfect dwelling of God in Christ, for "the Word became flesh and dwelt among us" (John 1:14). The various offerings, particularly the grain offering of fine flour mingled with oil, symbolized a life of dedication, thanksgiving, and acknowledgment of God's bountiful provision. Yet, these Old Testament offerings were inherently imperfect, requiring constant repetition and pointing beyond themselves to a greater reality. Christ, however, offered Himself as the perfect, once-for-all sacrifice, fulfilling and superseding every type and shadow of the Old Covenant offerings (Hebrews 10:10-14). He is the ultimate "fine flour" – the "bread of life," pure, unblemished, and fully sufficient to nourish the soul (John 6:35), perfectly "mingled" with the "oil" of the Holy Spirit, whom He received without measure (John 3:34). The "shekel of the sanctuary," representing God's unyielding standards of integrity and precision, points directly to Christ's perfect righteousness and His unblemished, unwavering obedience to the Father's will in every aspect of His life (Hebrews 4:15). Through His perfect life, His sacrificial death on the cross, and His glorious resurrection, Jesus provided the true and lasting means for humanity to draw near to a holy God, rendering obsolete the need for repeated Tabernacle offerings and inviting us, in response to His perfect love, to offer our very selves as living, holy, and acceptable sacrifices to God (Romans 12:1).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 7 verses 10–89

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here an account of the great solemnity of dedicating the altars, both that of burnt-offerings and that of incense; they had been sanctified before, when they were anointed (Lev 8:10, Lev 8:11), but now they were handselled, as it were, by the princes, with their free-will offerings. They began the use of them with rich presents, great expressions of joy and gladness, and extraordinary respect to those tokens of God's presence with them. Now observe here,

I. That the princes and great men were first and forwardest in the service of God. Those that are entitled to precedency should go before in good works, and that is true honour. Here is an example to the nobility and gentry, those that are in authority and of the first rank in their country; they ought to improve their honour and power, their estate and interest, for the promoting of religion, and the service of God, in the places where they live. It is justly expected that those who have more than others should do more good than others with what they have, else they are unfaithful stewards, and will not make up their account with joy. Nay, great men must not only with their wealth and power assist and protect those that serve God, but they must make conscience of being devout and religious themselves, and employing themselves in the exercises of piety, which will greatly redound to the honour of God (Psa 138:4, Psa 138:5), and have a good influence upon others, who will be the more easily persuaded to acts of devotion when they see them thus brought into reputation. It is certain that the greatest of men is less than the least of the ordinances of God; nor are the meanest services of religion any disparagement to those that make the greatest figure in the world.

II. The offerings they brought were very rich and valuable, so rich that some think there was not so great a difference in estate between them and others as that they were able to bear the expense of them themselves, but that the heads of each tribe contributed to the offering which their prince brought.

1.They brought some things to remain for standing service, twelve large silver dishes, each about sixty ounces weight, as many large silver cups, or bowls, of about thirty-five ounces - the former to be used for the meat-offerings, the latter for the drink-offerings - the former for the flesh of the sacrifices, the latter for the blood. The latter was God's table (as it were), and it was fit that so great a King should be served in plate. The golden spoons being filled with incense were intended, it is probable, for the service of the golden altar, for both the altars were anointed at the same time. Note, In works of piety and charity we ought to be generous according as our ability is. He that is the best should be served with the best we have. The Israelites indeed might well afford to part with their gold and silver in abundance to the service of the sanctuary, for they needed it not to buy meat and victual their camp, being daily fed with bread from heaven; nor did they need it to buy land, or pay their army, for they were shortly to be put in possession of Canaan.

2.They brought some things to be used immediately, offerings of each sort, burnt-offerings, sin-offerings, and a great many peace-offerings (on part of which they were to feast with their friends), and the meat-offerings that were to be annexed to them. Hereby they signified their thankful acceptance of, and cheerful submission to, all those laws concerning the sacrifices which God had lately by Moses delivered to them. And, though it was a time of joy and rejoicing, yet it is observable that still in the midst of their sacrifices we find a sin-offering. Since in our best services we are conscious to ourselves that there is a mixture of sin, it is fit that there should be even in our most joyful services a mixture of repentance. In all our approaches to God, we must by faith have an eye to Christ as the great sin-offering, and make mention of him.

3.They brought their offerings each on a separate day, in the order that they had been lately put into, so that the solemnity lasted twelve days. So God appointed (Num 7:11): They shall bring their offering, each prince on his day, and so they did. One sabbath must needs fall within the twelve days, if not two, but it should seem they did not intermit on the sabbath, for it was holy work, proper enough for a holy day. God appointed that it should thus be done on several days, (1.) That solemnity might be prolonged, and so might be universally taken notice of by all Israel, and the remembrance of it more effectually preserved. (2.) That an equal honour might thereby be put upon each tribe respectively; in Aaron's breast-plate each had his precious stone, so in this offering each had his day. (3.) Thus it would be done more decently and in order; God's work should not be done confusedly, and in a hurry; take time, and we shall have done the sooner, or at least we shall have done the better. (4.) God hereby signified how much pleased he is, and how much pleased we should be, with the exercises of piety and devotion. The repetition of them should be a continual pleasure to us, and we must not be weary of well doing. If extraordinary service be required to be done for twelve days together, we must not shrink from it, nor call it a task and a burden. (5.) The priests and Levites, having this occasion to offer the same sacrifices, and those some of every sort, every day, for so many days together, would have their hands well set in, and would be well versed in the laws concerning them. (6.) The peace-offerings were all to be eaten the same day they were offered, and two oxen, five rams, five he-goats, and five lambs, were enough for one day's festival; had there been more, especially if all had been brought on one day, there might have been danger of excess. The virtue of temperance must not be left, under pretence of the religion of feasting.

4.All their offerings were exactly the same, without any variation, though it is probable that neither the princes nor the tribes were all alike rich; but thus it was intimated that all the tribes of Israel had an equal share in the altar, and an equal interest in the sacrifices that were offered upon it. Though one tribe was posted more honourably in the camp than another, yet they and their services were all alike acceptable to God. Nor must we have faith of our Lord Jesus Christ with respect to persons, Jam 2:1.

5.Nahshon, the prince of the tribe of Judah, offered first, because God had given that tribe the first post of honour in the camp; and the rest of the tribes acquiesced, and offered in the same order in which God had appointed them to encamp. Judah, of which tribe Christ came, first, and then the rest; thus, in the dedication of souls to God, every man is presented in his own order, Christ the first-fruits, Co1 15:23. Some observe that Nahshon is the only one that is not expressly called a prince (Num 7:12), which the Jews give this account of: he is not called a prince, that he might not be puffed up because he offered first; and all the others are called princes because they (though some of them of the elder house) submitted, and offered after him. Or, because the title of prince of Judah did more properly belong to Christ, for unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

6.Though the offerings were all the same, yet the account of them is repeated at large for each tribe, in the same words. We are sure there are no vain repetitions in scripture; what then shall we make of these repetitions? Might it not have served to say of this noble jury that the same offering which their foreman brought each on his day brought likewise? No, God would have it specified for each tribe: and why so? (1.) It was for the encouragement of these princes, and of their respective tribes, that each of their offerings being recorded at large no slight might seem to be put upon them; for rich and poor meet together before God. (2.) It was for the encouragement of all generous acts of piety and charity, by letting us know that what is so given is lent to the Lord, and he carefully records it, with every one's name prefixed to his gift, because what is so given he will pay again, and even a cup of cold water shall have its reward. He is not unrighteous, to forget either the cost or the labour of love, Heb 6:10. We find Christ taking particular notice of what was cast into the treasury, Mar 12:41. Though what is offered be but little, though it be a contribution to the charity of others, yet if it be according to our ability it shall be recorded, that it may be recompensed in the resurrection of the just.

7.The sum total is added at the foot of the account (Num 7:84-88), to show how much God was pleased with the mention of his freewill-offerings, and what a great deal they amounted to in the whole, when every prince brought in his quota! How greatly would the sanctuary of God be enriched and beautified if all would in their places do their part towards it, by exemplary purity and devotion, extensive charity, and universal usefulness!

8.God signified his gracious acceptance of these presents that were brought him, by speaking familiarly to Moses, as a man speaks to his friend, from off the mercy-seat (Num 7:89, Num 12:8); and in speaking to him he did in effect speak to all Israel, showing them this token for good, Psa 103:7. Note, By this we may know that God hears and accepts our prayers if he gives us grace to hear and receive his word, for thus our communion with him is maintained and kept up. I know not why we may not suppose that upon each of the days on which these offerings were brought (probably while the priests and offerers were feasting upon the peace-offerings) Moses was in the tabernacle, receiving some of those laws and orders which we have already met with in this and the foregoing book. And here the excellent bishop Patrick observes that God's speaking to Moses thus by an audible articulate voice, as if he had been clothed with a holy body, might be looked upon as an earnest of the incarnation of the Son of God in the fulness of time, when the Word should be made flesh, and speak in the language of the sons of men. For, however God at sundry times and in divers manners spoke unto the fathers, he has in these last days spoken unto us by his Son. And that he who now spoke to Moses, as the shechinah or divine Majesty, from between the cherubim, was the eternal Word, the second person in the Trinity, was the pious conjecture of many of the ancients; for all God's communion with man is by his Son, by whom he made the world, and rules the church, and who is the same yesterday, today, and for ever.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–89. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 7:13 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

Read & Compare

Commentaries

Original Language & Research

Sermons, Hymns & Audio

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.