Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites: and of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And the sons H1121 of Bela H1106 were Ard H714 and Naaman H5283: of Ard, the family H4940 of the Ardites H716: and of Naaman H5283, the family H4940 of the Naamites H5280.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The sons of Bela were Ard and Na'aman; [of Ard,] the family of the Ardi; and of Na'aman, the family of the Na'ami.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
And the descendants of Bela from Ard and Naaman were the Ardite clan from Ard and the Naamite clan from Naaman.
Ask
American Standard Version
And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard, the family of the Ardites; of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman: the family of the Ardites; of Naaman, the family of the Naamites.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And the sonnes of Bela were Ard and Naaman: of Ard came the familie of the Ardites, of Naaman, the familie of the Naamites.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And sons of Bela are Ard and Naaman: of Ard is the family of the Ardite: of Naaman the family of the Naamite.
Ask
In the KJVVerse 4,530 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Numbers 26:40 provides a precise genealogical record of two specific family lines, the Ardites and the Naamites, tracing their descent from Ard and Naaman, who were sons of Bela, a prominent son of Benjamin. This verse is an integral part of the second census of Israel, conducted in the plains of Moab, serving to identify and enumerate the new generation prepared to inherit the Promised Land, establish clear tribal and familial identities, and lay the foundational basis for the equitable distribution of territory. It powerfully illustrates God's meticulous order and profound attention to detail in His dealings with His covenant people, ensuring every family unit had its divinely appointed place and inheritance within the community of Israel.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Numbers 26:40 is carefully situated within the comprehensive and detailed account of the second census of the Israelites, which spans the entirety of Numbers 26. This pivotal census occurs approximately 38 years after the initial enumeration recorded in Numbers 1, marking a significant generational and historical transition for Israel. While the first census focused on the generation that largely perished in the wilderness due to their disobedience and unbelief, this subsequent enumeration meticulously accounts for the new generation, those born and raised during the wilderness wanderings, who are now divinely poised to enter and possess the Promised Land. The verses immediately preceding verse 40, specifically Numbers 26:38-39, introduce the sons of Benjamin and their burgeoning descendants, with verse 40 then precisely detailing two prominent family branches originating from Bela, Benjamin's firstborn. The meticulous listing of these family units, such as the Ardites and Naamites, directly precedes and undergirds the divine instructions for land distribution, which are explicitly outlined based on population size in Numbers 26:52-56, thereby underscoring the practical and legal purpose of this detailed genealogical record.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: The historical setting for this crucial census is the plains of Moab, strategically located on the eastern side of the Jordan River, directly opposite the city of Jericho. This geographical position vividly signifies the Israelites' imminent and long-awaited entry into Canaan, the land solemnly promised by God to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In the ancient Near Eastern world, genealogies were far more than mere historical chronicles; they were foundational legal and social documents that established social structure, determined legal rights, and, most critically, validated claims to land ownership. Tribal and familial identity was of paramount importance, meticulously defining an individual's place within the broader community, their military obligations, and their inheritance claims. The exceptionally detailed nature of this census, extending even to specific family branches like those mentioned in Numbers 26:40, profoundly reflects the cultural and theological imperative of maintaining clear and unbroken lines of descent. This meticulousness ensured the equitable and divinely ordained distribution of the land, preventing disputes and affirming God's providential order. Furthermore, the census served a vital military purpose, assessing the fighting strength of each tribe for the impending conquest, and a profound theological purpose, powerfully demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness in preserving, multiplying, and preparing His people despite their past rebellion and the severe judgments experienced during the wilderness wanderings.

  • Key Themes: This specific verse, as an integral component of the broader census narrative, significantly contributes to several profound themes woven throughout the book of Numbers and the Pentateuch as a whole. A primary and overarching theme is God's Unwavering Faithfulness to His Covenant Promises, particularly the solemn promise of land inheritance made to Abraham's descendants, as initially articulated in Genesis 12:7. The meticulous counting of this new generation powerfully demonstrates that God is indeed bringing His people to the very threshold of fulfilling this promise, despite the profound failures and unbelief of the preceding generation. Another central theme illuminated by this verse is Divine Order and Meticulousness. The very act of God commanding such an incredibly detailed census, extending even to specific family units like the Ardites and Naamites, profoundly reveals His orderly nature and His intimate concern for every individual and every family within His covenant people. This divine precision ensures justice and equity in land allocation and powerfully reinforces the divinely structured and organized nature of the Israelite community. Finally, the emphasis on Identity and Belonging through Lineage is absolutely central. Each family, precisely identified by its patriarch, knew its distinct place within the larger tribal structure, thereby reinforcing a collective identity as the chosen people of God, destined for a shared and divinely appointed inheritance, as explicitly articulated in Numbers 33:54.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Bela (Hebrew, Belaʻ, H1106): As per H1106, this is the name of Benjamin's firstborn son, from whom the family lines of Ard and Naaman descend. Bela is consistently mentioned in key genealogical records (e.g., Genesis 46:21, 1 Chronicles 7:6), establishing his significant prominence in Benjamin's lineage. His inclusion here underscores the continuation of the tribal lineage through specific, identifiable, and foundational family units.
  • Ard (Hebrew, ʼArd, H714): As per H714, Ard is identified as a son of Bela and therefore a grandson of Benjamin. While the specific etymology of "Ard" (suggesting "fugitive") might hold deeper meaning, its primary significance in this context lies in its role as the progenitor of a distinct family group, "the Ardites" (H716, ʼArdîy). The transformation of a personal name into a collective family designation is a common and crucial linguistic and cultural practice in Hebrew, emphasizing corporate identity, shared descent, and collective rights.
  • Naaman (Hebrew, Naʻămân, H5283): As per H5283, Naaman is another son of Bela. His name, meaning "pleasantness" or "agreeableness," is significant. Like Ard, Naaman gives rise to a distinct family, "the Naamites" (H5280, Naʻămîy). The explicit mention of these two specific family lines originating from Bela highlights the internal subdivisions and hierarchical structure within the larger tribal framework, each with its own established identity and future claim to the promised land.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the sons of Bela were Ard and Naaman:" This opening clause precisely identifies the immediate paternal ancestry of the two family lines that are subsequently enumerated. By stating that Ard and Naaman were "sons of Bela," the verse firmly links these families directly to the tribe of Benjamin, as previously established in Numbers 26:38. This meticulous genealogical statement is absolutely crucial for establishing the legitimacy, tribal affiliation, and specific place of these families within the larger, divinely ordered Israelite community.
  • "[of Ard], the family of the Ardites:" This segment clearly specifies the first of the two distinct family lines being accounted for in the census. "Ard" is explicitly presented as the foundational progenitor, and "the Ardites" (הָאַרְדִּי) denotes his collective descendants, thereby forming a clearly defined and recognized clan or subdivision within the tribe of Benjamin. The use of the definite article "the" (הָ) before "Ardites" confirms their status as an established and identifiable family unit, ready for inclusion in the land distribution.
  • "[and] of Naaman, the family of the Naamites." In a parallel and equally precise manner, this clause identifies the second family line originating from Bela. "Naaman" is designated as the progenitor, and "the Naamites" (הַנַּעֲמִי) are his collective descendants. The deliberate parallel structure employed with the Ardites emphasizes the equal standing, distinct identity, and recognized status of both families, both having originated from Bela, and both contributing significantly to the overall population count and future land claims of the tribe of Benjamin.

Literary Devices

Numbers 26:40 predominantly utilizes Enumeration and Genealogical Listing, which are characteristic literary features throughout the book of Numbers and the broader Pentateuch, reflecting their profound focus on Israel's lineage, tribal organization, and divine order. The verse itself is an isolated entry within a much larger, meticulously detailed list of families, collectively highlighting the divine precision and systematic approach in God's dealings with His covenant people. A key linguistic and literary device employed is Patronymics, evident in the formation of "Ardites" from Ard and "Naamites" from Naaman. This device effectively transforms individual names into collective identifiers for entire family units, serving to clearly define, distinguish, and authenticate the various clans within each tribe. This reinforces their corporate identity, their shared descent, and their specific, divinely appointed place in the upcoming land distribution. Furthermore, the Repetition of the phrase "the family of the..." for both the Ardites and the Naamites creates a rhythmic, formulaic structure. This stylistic choice is common in ancient legal and census documents, underscoring the authoritative, official, and enduring nature of this sacred record.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Numbers 26:40, though appearing as a dry genealogical entry, carries profound theological weight. It serves as a powerful testament to God's meticulous care for His covenant people and His unwavering commitment to fulfilling His ancient promises. The precise enumeration of specific families like the Ardites and Naamites profoundly demonstrates that God's overarching plan for Israel's inheritance of the land is not an abstract concept but a deeply personal and practical reality, intricately involving every single family unit. It reveals a God who is intimately involved in the minute details of His people's lives, ensuring divine order, establishing clear identity, and orchestrating the just distribution of His blessings. This divine attention to detail serves as an enduring reminder that God's faithfulness extends across every generation and to every individual within His covenant community, meticulously preparing them for the promised future.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While Numbers 26:40 meticulously details ancient family lines, the profound principles underlying this seemingly mundane record resonate deeply with believers in every generation. This verse powerfully reminds us that God is fundamentally a God of order, precision, and unwavering faithfulness. He is not a God of chaos or indifference, but one who meticulously plans and perfectly executes His divine purposes, extending His sovereign care even to the seemingly smallest details of our individual lives. Just as He intimately knew each family and their designated place within ancient Israel, so too does He know each of us with profound intimacy, having numbered the very hairs on our heads (Matthew 10:30). This census, which prepared a physical people for an earthly inheritance, serves as a powerful pointer to our infinitely more secure and eternal spiritual inheritance in Christ. It profoundly encourages us to place our complete trust in God's sovereign and meticulous plan, knowing with certainty that He has a unique and cherished place for each of us within His spiritual family, the church, and that He is faithfully working out His promises in our lives and throughout His vast creation. Our ultimate identity and belonging are found not in any earthly lineage or achievement, but in our glorious adoption as beloved sons and daughters through the redemptive work of Jesus Christ.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of this census, including the specific naming of family lines, profoundly speak to God's character and His intimate care for individuals within His larger plan?
  • In what tangible ways does knowing that God is a God of perfect order and divine precision bring comfort, or perhaps a healthy challenge, to your personal life and daily walk of faith?
  • How does the ancient Israelite concept of an "inheritance," inextricably tied to lineage and the Promised Land, deepen your understanding and appreciation of your spiritual inheritance in Christ?

FAQ

Why is such a detailed genealogical record important in the Bible, especially in a book like Numbers?

Answer: Detailed genealogical records, such as the one found in Numbers 26:40, are profoundly crucial in the Bible for several interconnected reasons. Primarily, they meticulously establish identity and lineage, which was absolutely fundamental in ancient Israelite society for defining social structure, legal rights, and tribal affiliation. These records served to publicly demonstrate God's unwavering faithfulness to His covenant promises, particularly the solemn promise of land to Abraham's descendants, as initially given in Genesis 12:7. The census ensured that each family and clan knew its rightful and divinely ordained claim to a specific portion of the Promised Land. Furthermore, these genealogies were of immense importance for tracing the divinely appointed messianic line, ultimately leading to Jesus Christ, thereby fulfilling numerous prophecies concerning His descent from both Abraham and David, as meticulously recorded in Matthew 1:1-17. They powerfully underscore God's meticulous attention to every detail in orchestrating His grand redemptive plan through specific individuals, families, and generations throughout history.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Numbers 26:40 is a specific genealogical entry deeply rooted in the old covenant, it finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment and spiritual resonance within the new covenant. The meticulous counting of families for an earthly inheritance in the wilderness powerfully foreshadows the spiritual and eternal inheritance secured for all believers in Christ. Just as the Ardites and Naamites had a specific, divinely appointed place and identity within the tribe of Benjamin, believers today find their ultimate and enduring identity and belonging not in any physical or ancestral lineage, but in their glorious spiritual adoption into God's family through saving faith in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 1:5). Jesus, as the true and ultimate Israel, perfectly fulfills the promises made to Abraham, including the promise of an inheritance, which is now spiritual, eternal, "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4). The census's overarching purpose of preparing a people for a physical land finds its ultimate and glorious reality in Christ gathering a new people for Himself—His church—who are now declared "heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17), destined not for an earthly territory but for an eternal kingdom. The divine order, precision, and meticulous care seen in the census of Numbers 26:40 powerfully point to the perfect, sovereign, and redemptive plan of God, fully realized and consummated in Christ, who is the head of a new spiritual lineage, a "chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession" (1 Peter 2:9).

Copy as

Commentary on Numbers 26 verses 5–51

This is the register of the tribes as they were now enrolled, in the same order that they were numbered in ch. 1. Observe,

I. The account that is here kept of the families of each tribe, which must not be understood of such as we call families, those that live in a house together, but such as were the descendants of the several sons of the patriarchs, by whose names, in honour of them, their posterity distinguished themselves and one another. The families of the twelve tribes are thus numbered: - Of Dan but one, for Dan had but one son, and yet that tribe was the most numerous of all except Judah, Num 26:42, Num 26:43. Its beginning was small, but its latter end greatly increased. Zebulun was divided into three families, Ephraim into four, Issachar into four, Naphtali into four, and Reuben into four; Judah, Simeon, and Asher, had five families apiece, Gad and Benjamin seven apiece, and Manasseh eight. Benjamin brought ten sons into Egypt (Gen 46:21), but three of them, it seems either died childless or their families were extinct, for here we find seven only of those names preserved, and that whole tribe none of the most numerous; for Providence, in the building up of families and nations, does not tie itself to probabilities. The barren hath borne seven, and she that hath many children has waxed feeble, Sa1 2:5.

II. The numbers of each tribe. And here our best entertainment will be to compare these numbers with those when they were numbered at Mount Sinai. The sum total was nearly the same; they were now 1820 fewer than they were then; yet seven of the tribes had increased in number. Judah had increased 1900, Issachar 9900, Zebulun 3100, Manasseh 20,500, Benjamin 10,200, Dan 1700, and Asher 11,900. But the other five had decreased more than to balance that increase. Reuben had decreased 2770, Simeon 37,100, Gad 5150, Ephraim 8000, and Naphtali 8000. In this account we may observe, 1. that all the three tribes that were encamped under the standard of Judah, who was the ancestor of Christ, had increased, for his church shall be edified and multiplied. 2. That none of the tribes had increased so much as that of Manasseh, which in the former account was the smallest of all the tribes, only 32,200, while here it is one of the most considerable; and that of his brother Ephraim, which there was numerous, is here one of the least. Jacob had crossed hands upon their heads, and had preferred Ephraim before Manasseh, which perhaps the Ephraimites had prided themselves too much in, and had trampled upon their brethren the Manassites; but, when the Lord saw that Manasseh was despised, he thus multiplied him exceedingly, for it is his glory to help the weakest, and raise up those that are cast down. 3. That none of the tribes decreased so much as Simeon did; from 59,300, it such to 22,200, little more than a third part of what it was. One whole family of that tribe (namely Ohad, mentioned Exo 6:15) was extinct in the wilderness. Hence Simeon is not mentioned in Moses's blessing (Deu. 33), and the lot of that tribe in Canaan was inconsiderable, only a canton out of Judah's lot, Jos 19:9. Some conjecture that most of those 24,000 who were cut off by the plague for the iniquity of Peor were of that tribe; for Zimri, who was a ringleader in that iniquity, was a prince of that tribe, many of whom therefore were influenced by his example to follow his pernicious ways.

III. In the account of the tribe of Reuben mention is made of the rebellion of Dathan and Abiram, who were of that tribe, in confederacy with Korah a Levite, Num 26:9-11. Though the story had been largely related but a few chapters before, yet here it comes in again, as fit to be had in remembrance and thought of by posterity, whenever they looked into their pedigree and pleased themselves with the antiquity of their families and the glory of their ancestors, that they might call themselves a seed of evil doers. Two things are here said of them: - 1. That they had been famous in the congregation, Num 26:9. Probably they were remarkable for their ingenuity, activity, and fitness for business: - That Dathan and Abiram that might have been advanced in due time under God and Moses; but their ambitious spirits put them upon striving against God and Moses, and when they quarrelled with the one they quarrelled with the other. And what was the issue? 2. Those that might have been famous were made infamous: they became a sign, Num 26:10. They were made monuments of divine justice; God, in their ruin, showed himself glorious in holiness, and so they were set up for a warning to all others, in all ages, to take heed of treading in the steps of their pride and rebellion. Notice is here taken of the preservation of the children of Korah (Num 26:11); they died not, as the children of Dathan and Abiram did, doubtless because they kept themselves pure from the infection, and would not join, no, not with their own father, in rebellion. If we partake not of the sins of sinners, we shall not partake of their plagues. These sons of Korah were afterwards, in their posterity, eminently serviceable to the church, being employed by David as singers in the house of the Lord; hence many psalms are said to be for the sons of Korah: and perhaps they were made to bear his name so long after, rather than the name of any other of their ancestors, for warning to themselves, and as an instance of the power of God, which brought those choice fruits even out of that bitter root. The children of families that have been stigmatized should endeavour, by their eminent virtues, to roll away the reproach of their fathers.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 5–51. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Numbers 26:40 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.