Skip to content

Matthew 27:44

“The Crucifixion of Jesus”Matthew 27:32–49

King James Version
The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.

Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain

KJV (with Strong's)
G1161 The thieves G3027 also G2532, which G3588 were crucified G4957 with him G846, cast G3679 the same G846 in his G846 teeth G3679.

Bible text: King James Version with Strong's numbers · Public domain

Berean Standard Bible
In the same way, even the robbers who were crucified with Him berated Him.

Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain

American Standard Version
And the robbers also that were crucified with him cast upon him the same reproach.

Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain

World English Bible Messianic
The robbers also who were crucified with him cast on him the same reproach.

Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain

Geneva Bible (1599)
The selfe same thing also ye theeues which were crucified with him, cast in his teeth.

Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain

Young's Literal Translation
with the same also the robbers, who were crucified with him, were reproaching him.

Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain

King James Version — Interlinear
11 Greek words
  1. ΤὸTo[the]G3588T-ASNDefinite article Accusative Singular Neuter
  2. δ᾽d᾽AndG1161CONJConjunction
  3. αὐτὸautolikewiseG846P-ASNPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Neuter
  4. καὶkaievenG2532CONJConjunction
  5. οἱhoitheG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  6. λῃσταὶlēstairobbersG3027N-NPMNoun Nominative Plural Masculine
  7. οἱhoithoseG3588T-NPMDefinite article Nominative Plural Masculine
  8. συσταυρωθέντεςsustaurōthenteshaving been crucifiedG4957V-APP-NPMVerb Aorist Passive Participle Nominative Plural Masculine
  9. αὐτῷautōHimG846P-DSMPersonal pronoun Dative Singular Masculine
  10. ὠνείδιζονōneidizonwere upbraidingG3679V-IAI-3PVerb Imperfect Active Indicative 3rd Plural
  11. αὐτόνautonHimG846P-ASMPersonal pronoun Accusative Singular Masculine
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Greek, not the KJV's wording. Why?

This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Greek word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Greek word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “charity” where the gloss reads “love”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.

Words in [ ] are added by the English.

Translation
Details
See on the biblical-era maps
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem)
All Matthew Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Matthew 27:32-43
Matthew 27:32-43 View full PDF
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table)
The Last Week of Jesus' Life (With Reference Table) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 24,174 of 31,102 · 77.7%

Study this verse

Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.

This verse

Even the two robbers crucified with Jesus throw the same taunts at him, so that every voice around the cross is raised against him.

“The thieves also, which were crucified with him,”

Even the men sharing his death.

“cast the same in his teeth.”

They threw the rulers’ taunts at him. Luke tells how one of them later repented.

Passage studyMatthew 27:32–49

The King of the Jews Crucified at Golgotha

Summary

When the soldiers lead Jesus out of Jerusalem, they press a man from Cyrene named Simon into carrying his cross. At Golgotha, the place of a skull, Jesus tastes a drink of vinegar mingled with gall and refuses it, and the soldiers crucify him, share out his clothes by lot and sit down to guard him. Over his head they fix the charge, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS, and on either side of him they crucify a thief. Passers-by, the chief priests with the scribes and elders, and even the thieves mock him and dare him to save himself and come down. From the sixth hour to the ninth, darkness covers the land, and then Jesus cries out the first words of Psalm 22, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Some who hear think he is calling for Elijah. Through all of it Scripture is being fulfilled, and the One they mock for staying on the cross stays there to save others.

Simon of Cyrene Carries the Cross

Before this, Pilate had washed his hands and handed Jesus over to be scourged (Matthew 27:24–26), and the soldiers had mocked him as King of the Jews with a robe, a crown of thorns and a reed (Matthew 27:27–31). “As they came out” is the procession leaving the city for the place of execution. A condemned man usually carried the crossbeam of his own cross, the patibulum, and John tells us that Jesus went out “bearing his cross” (John 19:17). Matthew, Mark and Luke all record that the soldiers then laid it on another man, and the plain reason is that Jesus, after the scourging, was too weak to carry it further. The Son of God was truly man, and his body failed under the load.

The man was Simon, from Cyrene, a city in North Africa in what is now Libya, with a large Jewish community. He was most likely a Jewish pilgrim who had come to Jerusalem for the Passover, an outsider who happened to be on the road that morning. Mark adds that he was the father of Alexander and Rufus (Mark 15:21).

The word “compelled” is angareúō, a word borrowed from Persian. It first meant to serve as a royal courier and came to mean pressing someone into public service, and Roman authority used it to seize men and goods as it needed them. Simon was conscripted on the spot. Jesus used the same verb in the Sermon on the Mount, when he told his disciples that if anyone compels them to go a mile, they should go with him two (Matthew 5:41). “To bear” is aírō, to lift up, take up or carry away, the verb behind John the Baptist’s words, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). The cross, staurós, is a stake or post set upright, the Roman instrument of execution, and the word later stands for Christ’s death itself.

Simon’s walk is a living picture of what Jesus had asked of every disciple: “If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me” (Matthew 16:24). Simon took up the cross because he was forced to, and yet he walked behind Jesus with it on his shoulders. Sharing another’s load is the life Paul describes when he writes, “Bear ye one another’s burdens” (Galatians 6:2). Simon carried the wood for a short distance. Jesus carried the weight of our sin, for “the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:3–6), and God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Did Simon become a follower of Jesus?

Mark names Simon’s sons as men his readers already knew, which strongly suggests that Simon and his family came to follow Christ. Scripture is silent about his faith before that day, and he began as an unwilling helper. The man who was made to carry the cross may well have been brought by it to the Saviour who died on it.

Golgotha, the Place of a Skull

“When they were come” uses érchomai, the everyday verb for coming or going, and it marks the end of the walk. The place is Golgothâ, a word of Aramaic origin (the “Chaldee” of the old lexicons) meaning “the skull”, the name of a knoll near Jerusalem. Matthew translates it for his Greek-speaking readers as “a place of a skull”, using kraníon, the word behind our “cranium”. The name Calvary comes from the Latin Calvaria, “skull”, which Jerome’s Latin Bible, the Vulgate, used for kraníon, and the KJV itself says Calvary in Luke’s account (Luke 23:33). Golgotha and Calvary are two names for one place.

Scripture leaves the reason for the name unstated. It may have come from the shape of the rocky hill, from its use as a place of execution, or from an old tradition that Adam’s skull lay there. Whichever it was, the name speaks of death, and it was there that Christ died to destroy death. Mark and John name the place as well (Mark 15:22, John 19:17). Our salvation was won at a real place, on a real day, before many witnesses.

Why was Jesus crucified outside the city?

Both the Law and Roman practice took executions outside the city. The Law commanded Israel to bring the blasphemer “without the camp” to be stoned (Leviticus 24:14), and Rome crucified men outside city walls, where the most people would pass and see. The Law also commanded that the bodies of the sin offerings of the Day of Atonement be carried outside the camp and burned (Leviticus 16:27). Hebrews draws the line from that offering to Golgotha: “Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate” (Hebrews 13:11–12). Being led out also showed that the city’s rulers had cast him out, even as he became the sin offering for his people.

The Drink Jesus Tasted and Refused

At Golgotha, before he was nailed to the cross, Jesus was given “vinegar to drink mingled with gall”. The vinegar, óxos, was sour wine, the cheap everyday drink of soldiers and labourers. Gall, cholḗ, is bile, and the word is used for bitter things. Mark describes the same drink as “wine mingled with myrrh” (Mark 15:23). It was a custom to offer a man about to be crucified a drink mixed with something bitter or numbing, and its purpose was most likely to dull the pain. Matthew’s wording matches the psalm of the righteous sufferer: “They gave me also gall for my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink” (Psalm 69:21).

Jesus “tasted thereof”, so he knew what was offered, “and he would not drink”. The verb behind “would” is thélō, to will, wish or choose, and with ou, “not”, and pínō, “to drink”, the phrase says that he was unwilling to drink it. He chose to go to the cross with a clear mind and to bear all of it awake. He had said that he lays down his life of himself (John 10:17–18), and Hebrews says of him that “for the joy that was set before him” he “endured the cross, despising the shame” (Hebrews 12:2–3).

Why did he refuse this drink and accept a later one?

The two drinks had different purposes. The first was meant to dull pain, and he refused it. Near the end, after the hours of darkness, a bystander lifted plain sour wine to him on a sponge (verse 48), and John records that Jesus said, “I thirst,” and received it (John 19:28–30). That later drink met the thirst of a dying man, whose tongue cleaved to his jaws as the psalm says (Psalm 22:15), and it fulfilled Psalm 69:21 a second time. It came when his work was almost finished. He refused what would numb him and accepted what met his thirst.

Crucified, and His Clothes Divided by Lot

Matthew tells the crucifixion itself in four words: “And they crucified him.” The verb stauróō, to crucify, comes from staurós, the cross. Rome kept this death for slaves, rebels and the lowest criminals, and it was designed to give the greatest pain and the deepest public shame.

The soldiers who carried out an execution took the condemned man’s clothes as their pay, and here they “parted his garments, casting lots”. The verb diamerízō means to divide up and distribute, its usual sense, and casting lots was the common way of deciding a share, much like throwing dice. Matthew’s quotation uses two words for clothing, himátion for “garments”, the outer clothing, and himatismós for “vesture”, clothing in general. John fills in the scene. Jesus’ coat was “without seam, woven from the top throughout”, and tearing it would have ruined it, so the soldiers cast lots to decide who would have it whole (John 19:23–24). They left him stripped of everything he had.

“That it might be fulfilled” uses plēróō, to fill up or complete, the word Matthew uses for Scripture coming true from the birth of Jesus onward (Matthew 1:22–23). The prophet is David, and the words are from Psalm 22:18. The soldiers were dividing a dying man’s clothes for their own gain, thinking only of the spoil, and they did exactly what God had spoken through David. God rules even the careless acts of men who oppose his Son, and his word comes true down to a garment and a throw of the lots. The whole of Psalm 22 runs through this passage: the mocking, the wagging heads, the trust in God thrown back at the sufferer, the garments and the opening cry.

The One stripped at Golgotha is the One who clothes his people. Isaiah rejoices that the LORD has clothed him with the garments of salvation (Isaiah 61:10), and that clothing was bought here.

The Soldiers Sit Down to Watch

“And sitting down they watched him there.” The verb káthēmai means to sit or be seated, and also to stay in a place for a time. The verb tēréō means to guard by keeping an eye on someone, and its tense in the Greek describes a watch that went on and on. The adverb ekeî is simply “there”, at that place. The soldiers settled in for a long duty. They guarded the condemned so that nobody could take him down or rescue him, and they stayed until death. John records that they later broke the legs of the two others, found Jesus already dead, and pierced his side (John 19:31–37).

For these men it was routine work. The psalmist had said of his enemies, “they look and stare upon me” (Psalm 22:17), and Luke tells of the people standing and watching while the rulers scoffed (Luke 23:35). The soldiers watched without understanding what they saw. Before them the Son of Man was being lifted up, as he said, to draw all men to himself (John 12:32), and the Father “spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all” (Romans 8:32).

The Charge over His Head: The King of the Jews

The “accusation” is aitía, a cause or reason, and in law a charge brought against someone. Rome’s custom was to display a placard, the titulus, naming the condemned man and his crime, and here it was fixed to the cross above Jesus’ head. “Written” is gráphō, to write. John adds that the title was written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin, so that everyone in the crowd could read it (John 19:20).

The charge was THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS. The word for king, basileús, means one with authority to rule. To Roman ears the title named sedition against Caesar. To Jewish ears it named the Messiah, the son of David whom Israel awaited to restore its kingdom. The soldiers had already hailed him “King of the Jews” in mockery (Matthew 27:29). The chief priests asked Pilate to change the words to “He said, I am King of the Jews”, and Pilate refused (John 19:19–22).

Pilate wrote a charge, and God made it a proclamation. Jesus is the King of the Jews, and his kingship stands at the very hour of his shame. He had told Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). His throne that day was a cross and his crown was thorns, and because he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, God has highly exalted him and given him the name above every name (Philippians 2:5–11). The One under that title is “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Revelation 19:16).

Why did Pilate keep the wording?

Pilate’s reasons were probably mixed. He may have wished to assert Rome’s authority over the people, to sneer at the leaders who had pressed him to condemn Jesus, or simply to be done with a dispute he cared little about, seeing Jesus as one more agitator. Whatever he intended, his refusal kept the truth written over the cross for all to read.

Numbered with the Transgressors

“Then were there two thieves crucified with him.” The word for thief is lēistḗs, from a verb meaning to plunder, a robber or brigand. It describes a violent bandit, sometimes a rebel against Rome, and it is the word John uses for Barabbas (John 18:40), a rebel and a murderer. These men were crucified (stauróō) with Jesus, “one on the right hand, and another on the left”. The word dexiós simply means the right hand or right side, and the point of the arrangement is that Jesus hung in the middle. Rome placed him with the worst criminals, as one of them.

In doing so, Rome fulfilled Isaiah’s word about the suffering servant, “he was numbered with the transgressors” (Isaiah 53:12), and Mark records that fulfilment (Mark 15:27–28). Luke tells how the two were led out with him to be put to death (Luke 23:32–33). Jesus had said that he came to call sinners to repentance (Mark 2:17), and he died among the guilty, for the guilty. “God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8).

Verse 44 returns to these men. “The thieves also, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.” “Crucified with” is systauróō, to crucify together with, a word for sharing the same death. “Cast in his teeth” is oneidízō, to reproach, rail at, taunt or upbraid. “The same” means the taunts the rulers had just used, save thyself, come down, if thou be the Son of God. Even the men dying beside him, under the same punishment, turned on him, and every voice around the cross was raised against him.

Did both thieves mock him?

Both thieves joined the mockery at first, and later one of them changed. Luke records that one rebuked the other, asked Jesus to remember him when he came into his kingdom, and heard the promise, “To day shalt thou be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:39–43). Matthew gives the opening hours, when both men railed on him, and Luke gives what happened later, when one of them turned to Jesus. The two accounts tell of the same hours from different points in them.

Mocked by Passers-by and Rulers

The passers-by

“They that passed by” (paraporeúomai, to travel near) were ordinary people on the road beside Golgotha, swelled by the Passover crowds in Jerusalem. They “reviled him”, blasphēméō, to vilify, rail on or speak impiously, the word used for blasphemy against God, and here it was hurled at the Son of God. “Wagging their heads” joins kinéō, to stir or move, and kephalḗ, the head, in a gesture of scorn and of triumph over someone fallen. David had written, “All they that see me laugh me to scorn: they shoot out the lip, they shake the head” (Psalm 22:6–8), and another psalm speaks of enemies shaking their heads (Psalm 109:25). Isaiah said the servant would be “despised and rejected of men” (Isaiah 53:3).

Their words twisted something Jesus had said: “Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself.” False witnesses had used the same claim against him at his trial (Matthew 26:61). What Jesus actually said, early in his ministry, was “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up”, and John explains, “But he spake of the temple of his body” (John 2:19–21). The verb katalýō means to loosen down or demolish, and oikodoméō means to build. The mockers took his words of the stone temple in Jerusalem, and in their scorn they named the very thing that was about to happen. His body was being destroyed that day, and in three days he would raise it.

“If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross” uses the words Satan used in the wilderness, “If thou be the Son of God” (Matthew 4:3). The Father had already answered the question at the baptism and on the mountain of the transfiguration: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17, Matthew 17:5). “Save” is sṓzō, to save, deliver or protect, and the same verb comes back in verses 42 and 49. The mockers meant escape from the cross. Jesus was saving the world by staying on it, which is why Paul calls the preaching of the cross the power of God to those who are saved (1 Corinthians 1:18–25).

The rulers

“Likewise” (homoíōs, in the same way) the chief priests, scribes and elders joined in. The chief priests (archiereús) were the heads of the priesthood, mostly Sadducees, and they ran the temple. The scribes were experts in the Law of Moses, many of them Pharisees, and the elders were leading men of the people. Together they made up the council that had condemned Jesus. “Mocking” is empaízō, to jeer at or deride, the verb used for the soldiers’ mockery in the hall of the governor. The men who knew the Scriptures best stood at the foot of the cross and jeered at the One the Scriptures were about.

They spoke about him to the crowd: “He saved others; himself he cannot save.” The verb sṓzō stands behind both “saved” and “save”. “He saved others” admits what they could hardly deny, his healings and deliverances throughout his ministry. “He cannot save” is ou, “not”, with dýnamai, to be able, and they meant that he lacked the power. Jesus had told Peter in the garden that he could pray to his Father and at once be given twelve legions of angels and more (Matthew 26:53). His staying was the obedience of the Son, and the blood he was shedding was “my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins” (Matthew 26:28). The rulers spoke the truth in their scorn: to save others, he stayed.

“If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.” The title echoes the charge over his head, with the same word for king, and they demanded a sign of power that fitted their own idea of the Messiah. The resurrection three days later was a far greater sign, and still most of them refused to believe.

“He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him: for he said, I am the Son of God.” “Trusted” is peíthō, to persuade, and in the sense here, to trust or rely on. “Deliver” is rhýomai, to rescue or draw out. “If he will have him” uses thélō again, if God wants him, if God takes pleasure in him. “Son” is huiós. Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God was the ground of his condemnation, when the high priest put him on oath and the council judged him worthy of death (Matthew 26:63–66), and the leaders told Pilate that by their law he ought to die for making himself the Son of God (John 19:7). Their taunt repeats almost word for word what David wrote of the righteous sufferer: “He trusted on the LORD that he would deliver him: let him deliver him, seeing he delighted in him” (Psalm 22:8). They fulfilled the psalm while mocking the One it described. The Father did delight in his Son, and he delivered him through the cross, raising him from the dead.

Why did Jesus stay on the cross when he had power to come down?

Jesus stayed on the cross because that was how he would save others. He came to “save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:21) and to “give his life a ransom for many” (Matthew 20:28), and the way to do that was to die in their place. Peter writes that he “his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24). Coming down would have pleased the crowd and left us in our sins. He stayed until the work was done, and now, having died unto sin once, he lives unto God and death has lost its dominion over him (Romans 6:9–10). Through his blood we have redemption and are brought into the kingdom of God’s dear Son (Colossians 1:13–14).

Darkness over All the Land

“Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.” The sixth hour is about noon and the ninth about three in the afternoon, so for three hours in the middle of the day, when the sun is highest, the land went dark. The word skótos is darkness, literal or figurative. “There was” is gínomai, to become or come about, and it reports that darkness came. “Land” is gē, which can mean the earth, a land or the ground. Here “all the land” most likely means the whole region of Judea, so that everyone in and around Jerusalem saw it. Mark and Luke record the same darkness (Mark 15:33, Luke 23:44–45).

Was the darkness an eclipse?

The darkness was an act of God. Passover was always kept at the full moon, and an eclipse of the sun can only happen at the new moon, when the moon passes between the sun and the earth. At Passover an eclipse was impossible.

In Scripture darkness sent by God often marks his judgment. One of the plagues on Egypt was darkness (Exodus 10:21–23). Amos foretold a day when God would make the sun go down at noon (Amos 8:9–10), and Joel and Isaiah speak of the sun darkened at the day of the LORD (Joel 2:31, Isaiah 13:10). In these hours the Son was bearing the judgment due to our sin, made sin for us, and the darkness covered that holy and terrible work.

Jesus had said, “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12), and the light of the world went into the dark so that we could come out of it. The Father “hath delivered us from the power of darkness” (Colossians 1:13–14), Christ came “to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death” (Luke 1:79), believers are now “light in the Lord” (Ephesians 5:8), and God has called his people “out of darkness into his marvellous light” (1 Peter 2:9).

“My God, My God, Why Hast Thou Forsaken Me?”

“About the ninth hour”, as the darkness ended, “Jesus cried with a loud voice”. The verb anaboáō is to cry aloud, and the cry was loud enough for all around to hear. Jesus had been on the cross since the third hour, and the ninth hour was also the time of the evening sacrifice at the temple and an hour of prayer.

His words are given as he spoke them. The word ēlí is of Hebrew origin and means “my God”, spoken twice. The word lamá means “why”, and sabachtháni, an Aramaic word, means “thou hast left me”. Matthew then translates them: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” “Forsaken” is enkataleípō, to leave behind in a place, and in its bad sense to desert or abandon.

These are the opening words of Psalm 22:1. Every Jew who knew the Scriptures would have recognised them, and the psalm they begin goes on to describe the mocking, the pierced hands and feet (Psalm 22:16) and the parted garments, and ends with God’s deliverance and praise. Even in the depths, Jesus calls him “my God”. Earlier he had prayed for the men who crucified him, “Father, forgive them” (Luke 23:34), and this cry is the deepest point of all his suffering.

Was the Son truly forsaken by the Father?

Jesus truly bore the forsakenness that sin deserves. The sinless One was made sin for us (2 Corinthians 5:21) and “made a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13). God is “of purer eyes than to behold evil” (Habakkuk 1:13), and as the Son bore the sin of the world, the Father withdrew the comfort of his presence and poured out on him the judgment that sin brings. The Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit remained one God, and the unity of the Godhead stayed whole. What the Son endured was a real and unique forsaking in the place of sinners, for the hours he bore our sin.

Because he was forsaken, those who belong to him are kept for ever. The promise “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee” (Hebrews 13:5) rests on this cry. The cry also shows us a Saviour who knows the deepest human anguish from the inside, a high priest “touched with the feeling of our infirmities” (Hebrews 4:15).

“This Man Calleth for Elias”

“Some of them that stood there” (ekeî again), “when they heard (akoúō) that”, said that Jesus was calling for Elijah. The name Hēlías is the Greek form of Elijah, and in the KJV it stands as Elias. “Calleth for” is phōnéō, to call out or summon. “Eli” sounded like the prophet’s name, and Israel was expecting Elijah, because God had said, “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD” (Malachi 4:5). Elijah had been taken up to heaven alive (2 Kings 2:11), and some looked for him to come and help those in distress. During Jesus’ ministry some people had even thought Jesus himself was Elias (Matthew 16:13–14).

Some may have misheard in earnest, and others twisted his words for one more jest. Either way, the cry of the Son to his Father was heard as a call for a prophet. Peter had misunderstood the cross in the same way when he rebuked Jesus for speaking of it (Matthew 16:21–23), and John writes of Jesus, “He came unto his own, and his own received him not” (John 1:10–11).

The sponge of vinegar

“Straightway”, euthéōs, immediately, one of them ran (tréchō), took (lambánō) a sponge (spóngos), filled it (plḗthō) with vinegar, put it on (peritíthēmi, to place around) a reed (kálamos), and gave him to drink (potízō). The vinegar is óxos, the same word as in verse 34, cheap sour wine, often watered down. The reed lifted the sponge to the mouth of a man raised up on a cross. John records that this came after Jesus said “I thirst”, and that the sponge was put on hyssop (John 19:28–30), the plant Israel used in its rites of cleansing. Mark tells the same moment (Mark 15:35–36), and once more Psalm 69:21 was fulfilled.

The man’s motive is left open. He ran at once, which may show pity for a dying man’s thirst, or the sour drink may have been one more piece of mockery among people who were jeering. Whatever he meant, his act fulfilled Scripture. The reed recalls the one the soldiers had put in Jesus’ hand to mock him as king, and the bitter drink recalls the cup Jesus had asked his Father in Gethsemane to take from him, if it were possible (Matthew 26:39). He had come in the likeness of men (Philippians 2:5–11), and he thirsted as men thirst.

“Let us see whether Elias will come”

“The rest”, loipoí, the others, said, “Let be”, leave him alone, wait. “Let us see whether Elias will come to save him.” Here the verb sṓzō closes the passage, and the mockery of verse 40 and verse 42 comes round again. They waited for a prophet to rescue Jesus from death, while Jesus was saving them by his death. Moments later he cried again and yielded up the ghost, and the veil of the temple was torn and the earth shook (Matthew 27:50–54). Three days later he rose, “raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:25).

The Saviour Who Stayed on the Cross

This passage shows us the cross as God’s own plan, carried out to the letter. Psalm 22, Psalm 69 and Isaiah 53 were written long before, and soldiers, rulers and passers-by fulfilled them without knowing it. God’s word held in the darkest hour, and it holds now.

It shows us a Saviour who chose this death. He tasted the numbing drink and refused it. He was dared to come down and stayed. The silent servant of Isaiah, who “opened not his mouth” (Isaiah 53:7), bore every taunt, and Peter writes that “when he was reviled, reviled not again” (1 Peter 2:23). The cup he drank was the new testament in his blood (Luke 22:20), and by the blood of his cross God has made peace and reconciled all things to himself (Colossians 1:19–20).

It shows us what our sin cost and how far God’s love went. The Son was counted among the transgressors and bore the darkness and the forsaking so that we would be brought into the light and kept by God for ever. If you belong to Christ, the cry of verse 46 was raised for you, and the promise that he will stay with you rests on it. Simon, pressed into service, walked behind Jesus with the cross on his shoulders, and the disciples of Jesus still take up their cross and follow him, carrying one another’s burdens as he carried ours.

Last revised

Historical interpretation

Nine Centuries of Reception

14 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

14 quotes · AD 253–1107
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
30040050060070080090010001100

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

It is appropriate that both thieves be understood to have blasphemed the Lord at first. Afterwards, however, one of them converted and believed because of the wonders he heard performed by the Lord and also, perhaps, because he saw miraculous changes in the heavens and the falling of an untimely darkness.
d. AD 367Hilary of Poitiersas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
What forgiveness then for them, when by the resurrection of His body they shall see the temple of God rebuilt within three days?

That both the thieves cast in His teeth the manner of His Passion, shows that the cross should be an offence to all mankind, even to the faithful.
But nevertheless not even here doth their contumely stop, but after having stripped and crucified Him, and offered Him vinegar, they proceeded still further, and beholding Him impaled upon the cross, they revile Him, both they themselves and the passers by; and this was more grievous than all, that on the charge of being an impostor and deceiver He suffered these things, and as a boaster, and vainly pretending what He said. Therefore they both crucified Him publicly, that they might make a show of it in the sight of all; and therefore also they did it by the hands of the soldiers, that these things being perpetrated even by a public tribunal, the insult might be the greater.

And yet who would not have been moved by the multitude that was following Him, and lamenting Him? Nay, not these wild beasts. Wherefore also He to the multitude vouchsafes an answer, but to these men not so. For after having done what they would, they endeavor also to injure His honor, fearing His resurrection. Therefore they say these things publicly, and crucified thieves with Him, and wishing to prove Him a deceiver, they say, "Thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days come down from the cross." For since on telling Pilate to remove the accusation (this was the writing, "The king of the Jews"), they prevailed not, but he persevered in saying, "What I have written, I have written," they then endeavor by their derision of Him to show that He is not a king.

Wherefore they said those things, and also these. If "He is the king of Israel, let Him come down now from the cross. He saved others, Himself He cannot save," aiming hereby to bring discredit even on His former miracles. And again, "If He be Son of God, and He will have Him, let Him save Him."

O execrable; most execrable! What, were not the prophets prophets, nor the righteous men righteous, because God rescued them not out of their dangers. Nay surely they were, though suffering these things. What then could be equal to your folly? For if the coming of the dangers upon them did not injure their honor with you, how much more in the case of this man, was it wrong for you to be offended, when both by what He did, by what He said, He was ever correcting beforehand this suspicion of yours.

Yet nevertheless, even when these things were said and done, they prevailed nothing, not even at the very time. At any rate, he, who was depraved in such great wickedness, and who had spent his whole life in murders and house-breakings, when these things were being said, then confessed Him, and made mention of a kingdom, and the people bewailed Him. And yet the things that were done seemed to testify the contrary in the eyes of those who knew not the mysterious dispensations, that He was weak and of no power, nevertheless truth prevailed even by the contrary things.
d. AD 407John Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Having stripped and crucified Christ, they go yet further, and seeing Him on the cross revile Him.

And as beginning to extenuate His former miracles, they add, Save thyself; if thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.

(Hom. de Cruc. et Latr. ii.) But He, on the contrary, does not come down from the cross, because He is the Son of God; for He therefore came that He might be crucified for us.

He trusted in God, let him now deliver him, if he will. O most foul! Were they therefore not Prophets or righteous men, because God did not deliver them out of their perils? But if He would not oppose their glory, which accrued to them out of the perils which you brought upon them, much more in this man ought you not to be offended because of what He suffers; what He has ever said ought to remove any such suspicion. When they add, Because he said, I am the Son of God, they desire to intimate that He suffered as an impostor and seducer, and as making high and false pretences. And not only the Jews and the soldiers from below, but from above likewise. The thieves, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.

At first both reviled Him, but afterwards not so. For that you should not suppose that the thing was arranged by any collusion, and that the thief was not a thief, he shows you by his wanton reproaches, that even after he was crucified he was a thief and a foe, but was afterwards totally changed.
d. AD 420Jeromeas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
They revile him because they passed by that way, and would not walk in the true way of the Scriptures. They wagged their heads, because they had just before shifted their feet, and stood not upon a rock. The foolish rabble cast the same taunt against Him that the false witnesses had invented, Aha! thou that destroyest the temple of God and rebuildest it in three days.

Even the Scribes and Pharisees reluctantly confess that He saved others. Your own judgment then condemns you, for in that He saved others, He could if He would have saved Himself.

But unworthy of credit is that promise, And we will believe him. For which is greater, to come down while yet alive from the cross, or to rise from the tomb when dead? Yet this He did, and ye believed not; therefore neither would ye have believed if He had come down from the cross. It seems to me that this was a suggestion of the dæmons. For immediately when the Lord was crucified they felt the power of the cross, and perceived that their strength was broken, and therefore contrive this to move Him to come down from the cross. But the Lord, aware of the designs of His foes, remains on the cross that He may destroy the Devil.

Or it may be said that at first both reviled Him; but when the sun had withdrawn, the earth was shaken, the rocks were rent, and the darkness increased, one believed on Jesus, and repaired his former denial by a subsequent confession.

Or, in the two thieves both nations, Jews and Gentiles, at first blasphemed the Lord; afterwards the latter terrified by the multitude of signs did penitence, and thus rebukes the Jews, who blaspheme to this day.
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 4.27.44
Here, through a figure of speech called syllepsis, instead of only one thief, both are described as having mocked Jesus. According to Luke, however, after one thief blasphemed, the other thief confessed his faith and rebuked the first. The Gospels do not disagree with each other. At first each thief blasphemed. But after the sun had fled, the earth shook, rocks split apart and darkness fell, one of the thieves believed in Jesus and recanted his initial denial by a subsequent confession. Along with the two thieves each crowd of both the Gentiles and the Jews at first mocked the Lord.
d. AD 420JeromePost-NiceneSourceCommentary on Matthew
(Verse 44) Now even the robbers who were crucified with him were reviling him. Here, in a figurative sense known as σύλληψις, both robbers are depicted as blaspheming him. However, Luke asserts that while one blasphemed, the other confessed, and contrary to expectations, rebuked the blasphemer (Luke 23). It is not that the Gospels are inconsistent; rather, both robbers initially blasphemed, but then, as the sun set and the earth shook, and with rocks splitting and darkness descending, one believed in Jesus and rectified his previous denial with a subsequent confession. Among the two thieves, both the Gentiles and the Jews initially blasphemed the Lord. Later, one of them, struck by the magnitude of the signs, repented and to this day scolds the Jews for blaspheming.
d. AD 430Augustine of Hippoas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(de Cons. Ev. iii. 16.) It may seem that Luke contradicts this, when he describes one of the robbers as reviling Him, and as therefore rebuked by the other. But we may suppose that Matthew, shortly alluding to the circumstance, has used the plural for the singular, as in the Epistle to the Hebrews we have, Hare stopped the months of lions, (Heb. 11:33.) when Daniel only is spoken of. And what more common way of speaking than for one to say, See the country people insult me, when it is one only who has done so. If indeed Matthew had said that both the thieves had reviled the Lord, there would be some discrepancy; but when he says merely, The thieves, without adding 'both,' we must consider it as that common form of speech in which the singular is signified by the plural.
d. AD 461Leo the Greatas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(Serm. 55. 2.) From what source of error, O Jews, have ye sucked in the poison of such blasphemies? What teacher delivered it to you? What learning moved you to think that the true King of Israel, that the veritable Son of God, would be He who would not suffer Himself to be crucified, and would set free His body from the fastenings of the nails? Not the hidden meaning of the Law, not the mouths of the Prophets. Had ye indeed ever read, I hid not my face from the shame of spitting; (Is. 50:6.) or that again, They pierced my hands and my feet, they told all my bones. (Ps. 22:16.) Where have ye ever read that the Lord came down from the cross? But ye have read, The Lord hath reigned from the tree.e
AD 500Pseudo-Chrysostomas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
PSEUDO-CHRYSOSTOM.d But attend to this speech of these children of the Devil, how they imitate their father's speech. The Devil said, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down; (Matt. 4:6.) and they say now, If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.
d. AD 533Remigius of Rheimsas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Post-NiceneSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
(ap. Gloss. ord.) Or, by the two thieves are denoted all those who strive after the continence of a strict life. They who do this with a single intention of pleasing God, are denoted by him who was crucified on the right hand; they who do it out of desire of human praise or any less worthy motive, are signified by him who was crucified on the left.

Aha! is an interjection of taunt and mockery.
d. AD 856Rabanus Maurusas quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274Early MedievalSourceCatena Aurea by Aquinas
Had He then been prevailed on by their taunts to leave the cross, He would not have proved to us the power of endurance; but He waited enduring their mockery; and He who would not come down from the cross, rose again from the tomb.
d. AD 1107Theophylact of OhridMedieval
. As a slander against Christ the two thieves were crucified with Him, so that people would think that He, too, was such a transgressor of the law as they were. The two thieves were symbolic of the two races, the Jewish and the Gentile, for both races had transgressed the law and reviled Christ, just as both these thieves at first reviled Him. But later the one thief understood Who He was and confessed Him as King; whereupon he also said, "Remember me, Lord, in Thy kingdom" (Lk. 23:42). So, too, did the Gentile race confess Christ, while the other thief, the Jewish race, blasphemed. The devil prompted them to say, "If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross," in order to provoke Him to come down and thus overturn the salvation of all being accomplished on the cross. But Christ, Who is indeed the Son of God, was not persuaded by the enemy, so that you, O reader, might learn that we ought not to be persuaded by the ploys of the devil, but do what is good even if men think ill of us.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.

Continue studying Matthew 27:44 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.

Related study articles8