TRV
“Peter Denies Jesus”· Matthew 26:69–75
Translation
King James Version
And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. And he went out, and wept bitterly.
Complete Jewish Bible
Kefa remembered what Yeshua had said, "Before the rooster crows, you will disown me three times"; and he went outside and cried bitterly.
Berean Standard Bible
Then Peter remembered the word that Jesus had spoken: “Before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.” And he went outside and wept bitterly.
American Standard Version
And Peter remembered the word which Jesus had said, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. And he went out, and wept bitterly.
World English Bible Messianic
Peter remembered the word which Yeshua had said to him, “Before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times.” He went out and wept bitterly.
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Peter remembred the wordes of Iesus, which had sayde vnto him, Before the cocke crowe thou shalt denie me thrise. So he went out, and wept bitterly.
Young's Literal Translation
and Peter remembered the saying of Jesus, he having said to him--`Before cock-crowing, thrice thou wilt deny me;' and having gone without, he did weep bitterly.
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 24,130 of 31,102 · 77.6%
LawLawHistoryHistPoetryPoetProphetsProphNew TestamentNT
Study This Verse
Copy as
Historical interpretation
Nine Centuries of Reception
14 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.
Ante-NicenePost-NiceneEarly MedievalMedieval
30040050060070080090010001100
Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.
Upon examining Peter’s denial, we note that “as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.” For this reason, neither was it possible for Peter at the time to profess belief in Jesus nor was he to be criticized for not professing belief in him, since it is said to those who profess belief: “It is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father speaking through you.” We … since the Spirit of the Father has the power to speak in us and since it is in our power to “make room” in us for the Holy Spirit and not “for the devil,” if we should deny Christ, we would have no excuse.It may be that whoever is in the courtyard of Caiaphas “the high priest” cannot admit knowing the Lord Jesus unless he has gone outside his courtyard and has been brought outside of every teaching contrary to Jesus and outside of Jewish traditions handed down, not according to the Spirit of the Scriptures but according to the “commands and teachings of men.” Consider how Peter, seated outside at a distance from Jesus and in the high priest’s courtyard, denied Jesus before them all; and again, for the second time, going out to the porch and wishing to leave but not yet outside the gateway, he denied the Lord. Then, for the third time, “while the bystanders came and said, ‘Certainly you are also one of them,’ ” when “he began to invoke a curse on himself and to swear ‘I do not know the man,’?” he was not yet outside. Furthermore, all the denials were made at night and in the darkness, before the break of dawn and the sign of the new day, that is, the crowing of the cock that bestirs the early risers. And if, by way of hypothesis, Peter had denied after the crowing of the cock, as was said, “The night is far gone, the day is at hand … let us conduct ourselves becomingly as in the day,” he would have had no excuse for his actions.
Perhaps all people when they deny Jesus … seemingly deny him before the crowing of the cock, when the sun of justice has not yet risen for them and its rising is not yet at hand. But if upon the rising of the sun for the soul “we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins but a fearful prospect of judgment and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.”
I believe that the first servant girl who caused Christ’s disciples to deny him stands for the synagogue of the Jews “according to the flesh,” who have frequently coerced the faithful to deny him. The second maidservant stands for the assembly of Gentiles, who also in persecuting Christians has forced them to deny the Lord. And third were the bystanders in the courtyard, who are ministers of the different heresies and who also compel others to deny the truth of Christ.
Or, By the first handmaid is understood the Synagogue of the Jews, which oft compelled the faithful to deny; by the second, the congregations of the Gentiles, who even persecuted the Christians; they that stood in the hall signify the ministers of divers heresies, who also compel men to deny the truth of Christ.
(in Luc. 22, 57.) I had rather that Peter deny, than that the Lord be made out false.
Oh strange and wonderful acts! When indeed he saw his master seized only, he was so fervent as both to draw his sword, and to cut off the man's ear; but when it was natural for him to be more indignant, and to be inflamed and to burn, hearing such revilings, then he becomes a denier. For who would not have been inflamed to madness by the things that were then doing? yet the disciple, overcome by fears, so far from showing indignation, even denies, and endures not the threat of a miserable and mean girl, and not once only, but a second and third time doth he deny Him; and in a short period, and not so much as before judges, for it was without for "when he had gone out into the porch," they asked him, and he did not even readily come to a sense of his fall. And this Luke saith, namely, that Christ looked on him showing that he not only denied Him, but was not even brought to remembrance from within, and this though the cock had crowed; but he needed a further remembrance from his master, and His look was to him instead of a voice; so exceedingly was he full of fear.
But Mark saith, that when he had once denied, then first the cock crew, but when thrice, then for the second time; for he declares more particularly the weakness of the disciple, and that he was utterly dead with fear; having learnt these things of his masters himself, for he was a follower of Peter. In which respect one would most marvel at him, that so far from hiding his teacher's faults, he declared it more distinctly than the rest, on this very account, that he was his disciple.
How then is what is said true, when Matthew affirms that Christ said, "Verily I say unto thee, that before the cock crow thou shalt deny me thrice;" and Mark declares after the third denial, that "The cock crew the second time?" Nay, most certainly is it both true and in harmony. For because at each crowing the cock is wont to crow both a third and a fourth time, Mark, to show that not even the sound checked him, and brought him to recollection saith this. So that both things are true. For before the cock had finished the one crowing, he had denied a third time. And not even when reminded of his sin by Christ did he dare to weep openly, lest he should be betrayed by his tears, but "he went out, and wept bitterly."
And he, who, when he saw his Master laid hands on, drew his sword and cut off the ear, now when he sees Him enduring such insults becomes a denier, and cannot withstand the taunts of a mean servant girl. A damsel came unto him, saying, Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee.
But not once, but twice and thrice did he deny within a short time.
To show that the sound did not keep him from denial, nor bring his promise to mind.
Peter sat without, that he might see the event, and not excite suspicion by any approach to Jesus.
And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man. I know that some out of a feeling of piety towards the Apostle Peter have interpreted this place to signify that Peter denied the Man and not the God, as though he meant, 'I do not know the Man, because I know the God.'x But the intelligent reader will see that this is trifling, for if he denied not, the Lord spoke falsely when He said, Thou shalt deny me thrice.
Not that Peter was of a different speech or nation, but a Hebrew as his accusers were; but every province and every district has its peculiarities, and he could not disguise his native pronunciation.
In another Gospel we read, that after Peter's denial and the cock-crow, the Saviour looked upon Peter, (Luke 22:61.) and by His look called forth those bitter tears; for it might not be that he on whom the Light of the world had looked should continue in the darkness of denial, wherefore, he went out, and wept bitterly. For he could not do penitence sitting in Caiaphas' hall, but went forth from the assembly of the wicked, that he might wash away in bitter tears the pollution of his timid denial.
(Verse 74, 75.) Then he began to curse and swear, saying that he did not know the man. And immediately the rooster crowed. And Peter remembered the word of Jesus that he had said: Before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times. In another Gospel, we read that after Peter's denial and the rooster's crowing, the Savior looked at Peter and with his gaze, he caused him to burst into bitter tears. It was not possible for him to remain in the darkness of denial, whom the light of the world had looked upon.
And going out, he wept bitterly. Sitting in the courtyard of Caiaphas, he could not do penance. He goes out from the wicked council to wash the fearful filth of his denials with bitter tears.
“And again he denied it with an oath, ‘I do not know the man.’ ” I know that some people with a soft spot in their hearts for the apostle Peter have interpreted this passage to the effect that Peter did not deny God but man, and what he meant was “I do not know the man, because I know God.” The wise reader realizes how frivolous this interpretation is, for those who thus defend the apostle make the Lord guilty of a lie. If Peter did not deny him, then the Lord lied in saying, “Truly, I say to you, this very night, before the cock crows twice, you will deny me three times.” Notice what he says: “You will deny me”—not “the man.”“Certainly you are also one of them, for your accent betrays you.” Not that Peter spoke a different language or belonged to a foreign nation … but since each province and region had their own characteristics and vernacular, one could not help having a certain sound to his speech. For instance, the Ephrathites in the book of Judges cannot pronounce the word synthema.
“Then he began to invoke a curse on himself and to swear that he did not know the man. And immediately the cock crowed.” In the other Gospel we read that after Peter’s denial and the crowing of the cock, the Savior looked at Peter and, by his very gaze, aroused bitter tears in him. It could not be that Peter, on whom the light of the world had gazed, should remain in the darkness of denial.
(Quæst. Ev. i. 44.) That, they did spit in his face, signifies those who reject His proffered grace. They likewise buffet Him who prefer their own honour to Him; and they smite Him on the face, who, blinded with unbelief, affirm that He is not yet come, disowning and rejecting His person.
(de Cons. Ev. iii. 6.) Among the other insults offered to our Lord was the threefold denial of Peter, which the several Evangelists relate in different order. Luke puts Peter's trial first, and the ill usage of the Lord after that; Matthew and Mark reverse the order.
(ubi sup.) We understand that having gone out after his first denial, the cock crowed the first time as Mark relates.
(ubi sup.) The second denial was not outside the door, but after he had returned to the fire; for the second maid did not see him after he had gone out, but as he was going out; his getting up to go out drew her attention, and she said to them that were there, that is, to those that were standing round the fire in the hall, Tins fellow also was with Jesus of Nazareth. He who had gone out, haying heard this returned, that he might by denial vindicate himself. Or, as is more likely, he did not hear what was said of him as he went out, but it was after he came back that the maid, and the other man whom Luke mentions, said to him, And thou also art one of them.
(ubi sup.) Let us now come to the third denial; And after a while came they that stood by, and said to Peter, Surely thou also art one of them, (Luke's words are, About the space of one hour after,) for thy speech bewrayeth thee. (Luke 22:59.)
(Quæst. Ev. i. 45.) Also Peter thrice denied, because heretical error concerning Christ is limited to three kinds; they are in error respecting His divinity, His humanity, or both.
(Serm. 60, 4.) For this reason it should seem he was permitted to waver, that the remedy of penitence might be exhibited in the head of the Church, and that none should dare to trust in his own strength, when even the blessed Peter could not escape the danger of frailty.
(Serm. 60. 4.) Blessed tears, O holy Apostle, which had the virtue of holy Baptism in washing off the sin of thy denial. The right hand of the Lord Jesus Christ was with thee to hold thee up before thou wast quite thrown down, and in the midst of thy perilous fall, thou receivedst strength to stand. The Rock quickly returned to its stability, recovering so great fortitude, that he who in Christ's passion had quailed, should endure his own subsequent suffering with fearlessness and constancy.
Observe how baneful are communications with evil men; they even drove Peter to deny the Lord whom he had before confessed to be the Son of God.
Spiritually; By Peter's denial before the cock-crow, are denoted those who before Christ's resurrection did not believe Him to be God, being perplexed by His death. In his denial after the first cock-crow, are denoted those who are in error concerning both Christ's natures, His human and divine. By the first handmaid is signified desire; by the second, carnal delight; by them that stood by, the dæmons; for by them men are led to a denial of Christ.
What means this, that a handmaid is the first to tax him, when men would be more likely to recognise him, except that this sex might seem to sin somewhat in the Lord's death, that they might be redeemed by His passion? He denied before them all, because he was afraid to reveal himself; that he said, I know not, shows that he was not yet willing to die for the Saviour.
In this denial of Peter we affirm that Christ is denied not only by him who denies that He is Christ, but who denies himself to be a Christian.
Observe, that he said the first time, I know not what thou sayest; the second time, He denied with an oath; the third time, He began to curse and to swear that he knew not the man. For to persevere in sinning increases sinfulness, and he who disregards light sins, falls into greater.
After the third denial comes the cock-crow; by which we may understand a Doctor of the Church who with chiding rouses the slumbering, saying, Awake, ye righteous, and sin not. (1 Cor. 15:14.) Thus Holy Scripture uses to denote the merit of divers cases by fixed periods, as Peter sinned at midnight and repented at cock-crow.
Overcome with immense fear, Peter forgot his promises and became enslaved to human weakness, as if he were lifeless with fear, not knowing what he was saying. Understand it also in the spiritual sense, that Peter was rebuked by the servant girl, that is, by human weakness which is lowly and meant to be governed, until the cock crowed and brought him to his senses. The rooster is the Word which does not permit us to be lazy and to sleep, but says, "Wake up and rise, O sleeper!" Peter, therefore, was wakened by the Word as if by a rooster. Going out of the palace of the high priest, that is, the confines of a hardened mind, and leaving behind senselessness, he wept bitterly. While he was in the courtyard of the hardened mind, he could not weep, for he had lost his sense; but as soon as he went out, he came to his senses.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Matthew 26:75 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
CNTR CollationThe earliest Greek manuscripts of this verse, collated letter by letter.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Summary
Matthew 26:75 captures the agonizing moment of Peter's profound realization and subsequent bitter remorse, immediately following his third denial of Jesus. This verse marks the climactic fulfillment of Jesus' earlier prophecy concerning Peter's betrayal, highlighting the disciple's human frailty and the crushing weight of his failure to stand firm with his Lord during His trial. Peter's immediate departure and intense weeping signify a deep, genuine sorrow that sets the stage for his eventual restoration.
Context
Literary Context
This pivotal verse concludes the narrative of Peter's three denials, which unfolds in Matthew 26:69-74. Peter, having followed Jesus "at a distance" to the high priest's courtyard, found himself in a hostile environment, surrounded by those who sought to condemn Jesus (Matthew 26:58). His denials, each more emphatic than the last, directly contradict his fervent boasts just hours earlier that he would never disown Jesus, even if it meant death (Matthew 26:33-35). The cock crowing serves as the immediate trigger, bringing Jesus' precise words from Matthew 26:34 back to Peter's mind, making his failure undeniably clear and intensely painful.
Historical & Cultural Context
The events of Matthew 26:75 occur during the late hours of the night, following Jesus' arrest in Gethsemane and His illegal trial before the Sanhedrin. Jewish law prohibited trials at night, highlighting the corrupt nature of the proceedings. The high priest's courtyard would have been a bustling, tense environment, filled with temple guards, servants, and accusers, all hostile to Jesus. For Peter, a Galilean, his accent would have easily betrayed him in Jerusalem, making his attempts to blend in difficult. The "cock crow" (ἀλέκτωρ) was not merely the sound of a bird, but also a recognized division of the night, marking the third watch (around 3 AM). This detail underscores the precise fulfillment of prophecy and the dawning realization for Peter, as the night of betrayal gives way to the harsh light of truth.
Key Themes
Matthew 26:75 powerfully illustrates several profound themes. Firstly, it highlights Human Frailty and Failure, demonstrating that even a devoted disciple like Peter, despite his sincere intentions and bold declarations, can succumb to fear and pressure, revealing the inherent weakness of human resolve apart from divine strength. Secondly, it underscores Divine Foreknowledge and Prophecy Fulfilled, as Jesus' precise prediction in Matthew 26:34 comes to pass with chilling accuracy, emphasizing Christ's sovereignty and omniscience. Thirdly, Peter's "bitter weeping" introduces the theme of Genuine Remorse and Repentance, distinguishing his sorrow from the despair of Judas and setting the stage for his eventual restoration by Jesus, as seen later in John 21. Finally, the verse emphasizes the Power of Memory and Conscience, as the simple sound of a cock crowing triggers a flood of remembrance, forcing Peter to confront his actions in the stark light of Jesus' truth and his own broken promises.
Exposition and Analysis
Key Word Analysis
This word signifies not merely a casual recall, but to "bear in mind," to "recollect" with a sense of mental grasp and fixation. For Peter, it was a sudden, overwhelming flood of memory, bringing Jesus' specific words to the forefront of his consciousness with piercing clarity. This remembrance was not academic but deeply personal and convicting.
Derived from apo (away from) and arneomai (to deny), this term means "to deny utterly," "to disown" or "abstain from." Peter's denials were not mere evasions but emphatic rejections of any association with Jesus, a complete renunciation of his relationship with his Lord. The "thrice" emphasizes the complete and public nature of his disavowal.
An adverb derived from pikros (bitter), this word describes the manner of Peter's weeping as intensely, sharply, and painfully. It conveys a deep, heartfelt anguish and violent sorrow, far beyond simple tears. This indicates a profound spiritual pain and contrition, a visceral reaction to the gravity of his betrayal and the realization of his sin.
Verse Breakdown
"And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him,"
This phrase highlights the immediate cause of Peter's profound reaction. The sound of the cock crowing, as foretold by Jesus, served as the catalyst, triggering a sudden and vivid recall of Jesus' precise prophecy. This remembrance was not a gentle nudge but a forceful confrontation with his own failure and Jesus' divine foreknowledge.
"Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice."
This is the direct quotation of Jesus' prophecy, emphasizing its specificity and Peter's complete fulfillment of it. The "cock crow" served as the indisputable sign, marking the exact moment of prophecy's culmination. The "thrice" underscores the repeated and public nature of Peter's disavowal, making his betrayal undeniable.
"And he went out, and wept bitterly."
This describes Peter's immediate and overwhelming response. His departure from the courtyard suggests a need for privacy in his grief, perhaps overwhelmed by shame and sorrow. The phrase "wept bitterly" conveys the depth of his anguish – a profound, intense, and heart-wrenching sorrow that speaks of genuine repentance and remorse over his betrayal, distinct from the despair of Judas.
Literary Devices
Matthew 26:75 is rich with literary devices that amplify its emotional and theological impact. Foreshadowing is central, as Jesus' prophecy in Matthew 26:34 is precisely fulfilled, demonstrating His divine prescience and the inevitability of the events. There is profound Irony in Peter's earlier boasts of unwavering loyalty contrasting sharply with his abject failure under pressure. The scene evokes deep Pathos, drawing the reader into Peter's raw emotional pain and bitter remorse, making his human weakness relatable. The Symbolism of the cock crowing is potent; it is not just an auditory cue but a stark, undeniable signal marking the precise moment of truth and the crushing weight of Peter's betrayal, serving as a powerful reminder of Jesus' words and Peter's broken vows.
Theological and Thematic Connections
Matthew 26:75 serves as a profound theological touchstone, illustrating the depth of human frailty even in the most devoted of disciples, while simultaneously underscoring the unwavering truth of divine prophecy. Peter's bitter weeping is a powerful testament to genuine repentance, distinguishing his sorrow from the despair that leads to destruction. It highlights that true remorse involves a deep, painful recognition of sin against God and a turning away from it, rather than mere regret for consequences. This moment, though painful, is foundational to Peter's spiritual growth and eventual restoration, demonstrating God's sovereign grace that pursues and restores even those who stumble profoundly. It reminds believers that failure is not the end of the story, but often a catalyst for deeper humility, dependence on Christ, and a more profound understanding of God's mercy.
Reflection and Application
Peter's bitter weeping in Matthew 26:75 is a mirror reflecting the human condition: our capacity for both fervent devotion and profound failure. It reminds us that even with the best intentions and strongest declarations, our spiritual resolve can falter under pressure, revealing our deep need for God's sustaining grace. This passage calls us to humility, acknowledging our own potential for stumbling, and to a greater reliance on Christ's strength rather than our own. Peter's immediate and intense remorse provides a powerful model for genuine repentance: not simply regret for being caught, but deep sorrow for having grieved the Lord and violated our commitment. It assures us that God's grace is sufficient to forgive and restore even after significant failures, provided there is true contrition. We are invited to remember Jesus' words in our own lives, allowing them to convict, guide, and ultimately lead us back to Him when we stray.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why did Peter deny Jesus, despite his earlier fervent declarations of loyalty?
Peter's denials stemmed primarily from fear and self-preservation. He was in a hostile environment, surrounded by those who sought to condemn Jesus, and his association with Jesus put him in immediate danger. Despite his genuine love and earlier bold boasts (e.g., Matthew 26:33), Peter's human courage failed him when confronted with direct accusations and the threat of persecution. This highlights the profound weakness of human resolve apart from divine strength and the overwhelming power of fear in moments of crisis.
What is the significance of the "cock crowing" in this verse?
The cock crowing is highly significant for several reasons. Firstly, it serves as the precise, undeniable trigger for Peter's memory, fulfilling Jesus' prophecy to the letter (Matthew 26:34). Secondly, it marks a specific time of day, the "cock crow" being the third watch of the night (around 3 AM), signaling the end of the darkness of denial and the dawning of truth and conviction for Peter. Thirdly, it is a stark, audible symbol of Peter's spiritual awakening and the crushing realization of his betrayal, a direct, undeniable confirmation of his failure.
How does Peter's repentance differ from Judas's remorse?
The key difference lies in the nature and outcome of their sorrow. Peter's "bitter weeping" signifies genuine, God-centered repentance (Greek: metanoia), a profound sorrow for his sin against Jesus, leading to a turning away from that sin and ultimately to restoration. His grief was rooted in love for Christ and sorrow for having grieved Him. In contrast, Judas's remorse (Matthew 27:3-5) was a worldly sorrow, a regret over the consequences of his actions (the betrayal of innocent blood) rather than true contrition for sin against God. This led him to despair and suicide, demonstrating a lack of faith in God's mercy and forgiveness. Peter's path was one of brokenness leading to restoration; Judas's was one of despair leading to destruction.
Christ-Centered Fulfillment
Matthew 26:75, while focusing on Peter's profound failure, ultimately points us to the perfect faithfulness and redemptive work of Christ. Peter's denial underscores the universal human condition of sin and our inability to perfectly keep our vows or stand firm in our own strength. Yet, even in Peter's darkest moment, Jesus' divine foreknowledge and intercession were at work. Just before His arrest, Jesus told Peter, "Simon, Simon, behold, Satan has demanded permission to sift you like wheat; but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail; and you, when once you have turned again, strengthen your brothers" (Luke 22:31-32). This reveals that Christ, even in His own suffering, was actively interceding for His disciple. Peter's bitter weeping, though a consequence of his sin, was also a fruit of Christ's preserving grace and the Holy Spirit's conviction, leading him not to despair but to genuine repentance. Jesus, the perfect Son, never denied His Father, even unto death on the cross, thereby securing the forgiveness and restoration that Peter desperately needed and that we all require. His atoning sacrifice is the ultimate answer to our failures, making possible our reconciliation with God and our eventual restoration, just as Peter was restored by the risen Christ in John 21. Christ is the faithful High Priest who intercedes for us (Hebrews 7:25) even when we falter, and His perfect obedience covers our every denial, bringing us back into His fold.