Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
For G1063 I know G1492 that G3754 in G1722 me G1698(that is G5123, in G1722 my G3450 flesh G4561,) dwelleth G3611 no G3756 good thing G18: for G1063 to will G2309 is present G3873 with me G3427; but G1161 how to perform G2716 that which is good G2570 I find G2147 not G3756.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
For I know that there is nothing good housed inside me — that is, inside my old nature. I can want what is good, but I can’t do it!
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my flesh; for I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out.
Ask
American Standard Version
For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me, but to do that which is good is not.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwells no good thing. For desire is present with me, but I don’t find it doing that which is good.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
For I know, that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing: for to wil is preset with me: but I find no meanes to perform that which is good.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
for I have known that there doth not dwell in me, that is, in my flesh, good: for to will is present with me, and to work that which is right I do not find,
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Romans 7:18 encapsulates the profound internal struggle of humanity, particularly in its fallen state, revealing the inherent inability of the "flesh" to produce genuine spiritual good. Paul articulates a universal human experience: the presence of a desire to do what is right, yet a frustrating and persistent inability to consistently perform that good. This verse serves as a crucial bridge in Paul's argument, demonstrating the Law's inability to sanctify and the deep-seated power of sin, thereby setting the stage for the liberating power of the Holy Spirit introduced in the subsequent chapter.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Romans 7:18 is situated within Paul's extended discourse on the Law, sin, and the believer's experience, spanning Romans 7. Following his declaration in Romans 7:14 that the Law is spiritual but he is "carnal, sold under sin," Paul delves into the agonizing paradox of a person who assents to the goodness of God's Law but finds themselves perpetually failing to uphold it. The preceding verses (Romans 7:15-17) describe a person doing what they do not want to do, and not doing what they do want to do, attributing this internal conflict not to themselves, but to "sin that dwelleth in me." Verse 18 then grounds this struggle in the very nature of the "flesh," making a stark confession of its inherent incapacity for good, and further elaborates on the disconnect between intention and action. This sets up the climactic cry in Romans 7:24, leading directly to the solution found in Christ in Romans 8:1.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Paul's letter to the Romans was written to a diverse church in Rome, comprising both Jewish and Gentile believers. The Jewish believers would have had a deep reverence for the Mosaic Law, viewing it as God's divine revelation and a guide for righteous living. Paul's argument in Romans 7 challenges the notion that the Law itself can provide the power for sanctification. Instead, he demonstrates that while the Law is holy and good, it actually highlights sin and, paradoxically, can even provoke it in fallen human nature. This was a radical theological shift for many Jewish Christians, who might have struggled with the perceived inadequacy of the Law. Paul is addressing a fundamental human dilemma, but doing so through the lens of a Jewish understanding of the Law's role and the deeply ingrained concept of human responsibility before God. The cultural context of the Roman Empire, with its emphasis on moral philosophy and self-improvement, also provides a backdrop against which Paul's assertion of human inability and divine necessity would have stood in stark contrast.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Romans. Firstly, it underscores the pervasiveness and power of sin within fallen humanity, particularly in the "flesh" (human nature apart from God). Paul's declaration that "no good thing" dwells in his flesh emphasizes the radical corruption that necessitates divine intervention. Secondly, it highlights the inadequacy of the Law to provide righteousness or sanctification; while the Law reveals sin, it cannot overcome it. The Law exposes the internal conflict but offers no power to resolve it, as seen in the struggle between "to will" and "to perform." This sets the stage for the third major theme: the absolute necessity of divine grace and the Holy Spirit for true righteousness and victory over sin. The profound frustration articulated in Romans 7:18 and Romans 7:24 serves as the dark backdrop against which the glorious light of Romans 8 shines, demonstrating that freedom from sin's power is found not in self-effort or adherence to the Law, but in the empowering presence of the Spirit.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • dwelleth (Greek, oikéō, G3611): From Strong's G3611, meaning "to occupy a house, i.e. reside (figuratively, inhabit, remain, inhere)." This word emphasizes a settled, permanent presence. When Paul states that "no good thing" dwells in his flesh, he is not speaking of a temporary visitor or an occasional lapse, but of a fundamental, inherent characteristic of the fallen human nature. It signifies that the "flesh" is not merely capable of sin, but is fundamentally inhospitable to true spiritual good, lacking the capacity to house or produce it.
  • good thing (Greek, agathós, G18): From Strong's G18, meaning "good (in any sense, often as noun)." This term refers to intrinsic goodness, that which is inherently beneficial, morally upright, and pleasing to God. Paul's use of agathós here, rather than kalós (G2570, which often refers to outward beauty or excellence), underscores that the "flesh" lacks fundamental, spiritual, and God-pleasing goodness at its core. It is not just about outward performance, but inner disposition and capacity.
  • perform (Greek, katergázomai, G2716): From Strong's G2716, meaning "to work fully, i.e. accomplish; by implication, to finish, fashion." This verb denotes a thorough, complete, and effective execution of an action. Paul's struggle is not merely in initiating good, but in bringing it to full completion or consistent manifestation. The will to do good is present, but the power to fully and consistently accomplish it, to bring it to fruition in a way that truly pleases God, is absent in the flesh.

Verse Breakdown

  • "For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,)": Paul begins with a personal confession, "I know," indicating a deep, experiential understanding. The parenthetical clarification, "(that is, in my flesh,)", is crucial. It immediately defines the sphere of this inherent lack of good. "Flesh" (sarx) here does not refer to the physical body alone, but to the entire fallen human nature, apart from the regenerating and sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit. It is the self-centered, sin-inclined aspect of humanity.
  • "dwelleth no good thing:": This is a stark, absolute declaration. Within the sphere of the "flesh," there is no residing place for genuine, spiritual good (agathós). This is not to say that unbelievers cannot perform civil good or acts of kindness, but that the "flesh" itself, as a principle of life apart from God, cannot produce the righteousness and obedience that truly pleases God and flows from a renewed heart. It highlights the radical depravity of human nature apart from divine grace.
  • "for to will is present with me;": Here, Paul introduces the internal conflict. He acknowledges the presence of a desire, an inclination, or a resolve ("to will" - thélō) to do what is right. This suggests a conscience that recognizes God's standard and a mind that assents to it. The problem is not a lack of intellectual understanding or even a complete absence of desire for good, but rather a deeper spiritual incapacity.
  • "but [how] to perform that which is good I find not.": This clause reveals the tragic disconnect. Despite the presence of the will to do good, the ability to consistently and effectively "perform" (katergázomai) that good is utterly lacking. The "how" implies not just the method, but the power and consistent enablement. This "not finding" is a confession of utter futility in self-effort, underscoring the inability of the Law or human willpower to overcome the pervasive power of sin residing in the "flesh."

Literary Devices

Paul masterfully employs several literary devices to convey the profound internal struggle described in Romans 7:18. The most prominent is Antithesis, seen in the sharp contrast between "to will is present with me" and "how to perform that which is good I find not." This juxtaposition highlights the frustrating chasm between intention and execution, a central theme of the chapter. Furthermore, Paul uses Metonymy when he refers to "flesh" (sarx). While literally meaning the physical body, here it stands metonymically for the entire fallen, unregenerate human nature, characterized by its inherent weakness and inclination towards sin, apart from God's Spirit. The phrase "dwelleth no good thing" also borders on Personification, as "good thing" is treated as something that could reside or inhabit a place, emphasizing its absolute absence from the "flesh." This vivid language makes the abstract theological concept of human depravity tangible and relatable.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Romans 7:18 serves as a theological linchpin, articulating the profound truth of human inability to achieve righteousness through self-effort or adherence to the Law. It underscores the concept of radical depravity, not as a denial of humanity's capacity for civil good, but as an assertion that the "flesh" (fallen human nature) is fundamentally incapable of producing the spiritual good that pleases God and leads to salvation. This verse highlights the Law's role not as a means to sanctification, but as a mirror reflecting humanity's sinfulness and desperate need for a divine solution. It sets the stage for the glorious truth of God's grace and the empowering work of the Holy Spirit, which alone can enable believers to live a life pleasing to God, moving beyond the frustration of the flesh to the freedom of the Spirit.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Romans 7:18 offers profound comfort and liberation for believers who experience the ongoing internal struggle against sin. It validates that this tension between our desire to do good and our frustrating failures is a shared human experience, even for those who truly seek to follow Christ. This verse humbles us, reminding us that true spiritual transformation and the ability to consistently perform good works do not originate from our own willpower, self-discipline, or adherence to rules, but from a source outside ourselves. It compels us to acknowledge our utter dependence on God's grace and the indwelling power of the Holy Spirit. Instead of succumbing to despair or self-condemnation when we fall short, this verse redirects our gaze from our own inadequacy to Christ's sufficiency. It encourages us to lean into the Spirit's power for sanctification, recognizing that our striving is not futile, but must be Spirit-empowered. This understanding fosters humility, deepens our reliance on Christ, and cultivates a grace-centered approach to the Christian life, freeing us from the burden of legalism and self-righteousness.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life do you most keenly feel the tension between your desire to do good and your inability to consistently perform it?
  • How does Paul's statement, "in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing," challenge or affirm your understanding of human nature and your own spiritual capacity?
  • What practical steps can you take to shift your reliance from self-effort to the empowering presence of the Holy Spirit in your daily walk?

FAQ

Does "in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing" mean that humans are utterly incapable of any good deed?

Answer: No, this statement in Romans 7:18 refers specifically to the "flesh" (sarx) as the fallen, unredeemed human nature, apart from the work of God's Spirit. Paul is not denying that humans can perform civil good, acts of kindness, or even moral deeds in society. Rather, he is asserting that the "flesh" itself, as a principle of life, is fundamentally incapable of producing spiritual righteousness or perfect obedience that truly pleases God and leads to salvation. It highlights the deep-seated corruption that necessitates divine intervention for true spiritual good.

Is Paul describing the experience of an unbeliever or a believer in Romans 7?

Answer: This is a long-debated question among scholars. While some argue Paul is describing the pre-conversion experience of an unregenerate person under the Law, many prominent interpretations, especially given the context of Romans 7:22 ("For I delight in the law of God after the inward man"), suggest Paul is describing the ongoing, internal struggle of a regenerate believer. This interpretation highlights that even after conversion, the "flesh" (the old nature) remains a reality, and the battle against sin continues, leading to the desperate cry for deliverance that finds its answer in Romans 8 through the Holy Spirit. It depicts the tension between the new spiritual nature and the lingering influence of the old.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Romans 7:18, with its stark confession of human inability, serves as a powerful backdrop against which the glorious fulfillment found in Jesus Christ shines even brighter. The "no good thing" dwelling in the flesh and the inability to "perform that which is good" perfectly illustrates humanity's desperate need for a Savior. Christ is the ultimate answer to this dilemma, for He alone lived a life of perfect obedience, in whom "dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily" (Colossians 2:9). He perfectly fulfilled the Law that we could not, offering Himself as the spotless sacrifice to atone for our sin and reconcile us to God (2 Corinthians 5:21). Furthermore, the victory over the "flesh" that Paul yearns for is found in Christ's provision of the Holy Spirit. Through union with Christ, believers are no longer "in the flesh" but "in the Spirit" (Romans 8:9), empowered to "walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit" (Romans 8:4). What the Law could not do, God did by sending His own Son (Romans 8:3), enabling believers to truly perform good works, not by their own strength, but by the power of Christ working within them (Philippians 4:13). Thus, Romans 7:18 is not a statement of despair, but a profound theological setup for the liberating and empowering grace of God, fully realized in the person and work of Jesus Christ.

Copy as

Commentary on Romans 7 verses 14–25

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is a description of the conflict between grace and corruption in the heart, between the law of God and the law of sin. And it is applicable two ways: - 1. To the struggles that are in a convinced soul, but yet unregenerate, in the person of whom it is supposed, by some, that Paul speaks. 2. To the struggles that are in a renewed sanctified soul, but yet in a state of imperfection; as other apprehend. And a great controversy there is of which of these we are to understand the apostle here. So far does the evil prevail here, when he speaks of one sold under sin, doing it, not performing that which is good, that it seems difficult to apply it to the regenerate, who are described to walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit; and yet so far does the good prevail in hating sin, consenting to the law, delighting in it, serving the law of God with the mind, that it is more difficult to apply it to the unregenerate that are dead in trespasses and sins.

I. Apply it to the struggles that are felt in a convinced soul, that is yet in a state of sin, knows his Lord's will, but does it not, approves the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law, and yet lives in the constant breach of it, Rom 2:17-23. Though he has that within him that witnesses against the sin he commits, and it is not without a great deal of reluctancy that he does commit it, the superior faculties striving against it, natural conscience warning against it before it is committed and smiting for it afterwards, yet the man continues a slave to his reigning lusts. It is not thus with every unregenerate man, but with those only that are convinced by the law, but not changed by the gospel. The apostle had said (Rom 6:14), Sin shall not have dominion, because you are not under the law, but under grace, for the proof of which he here shows that a man under the law, and not under grace, may be, and is, under the dominion of sin. The law may discover sin, and convince of sin, but it cannot conquer and subdue sin, witness the predominancy of sin in many that are under very strong legal convictions. It discovers the defilement, but will not wash it off. It makes a man weary and heavy laden (Mat 11:28), burdens him with his sin; and yet, if rested in, it yields no help towards the shaking off of that burden; this is to be had only in Christ. The law may make a man cry out, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me? and yet leave him thus fettered and captivated, as being too weak to deliver him (Rom 8:3), give him a spirit of bondage to fear, Rom 8:15. Now a soul advanced thus far by the law is in a fair way towards a state of liberty by Christ, though many rest here and go no further. Felix trembled, but never came to Christ. It is possible for a man to go to hell with his eyes open (Num 24:3, Num 24:4), illuminated with common convictions, and to carry about with him a self-accusing conscience, even in the service of the devil. He may consent to the law that it is good, delight to know God's ways (as they, Isa 58:2), may have that within him that witnesses against sin and for holiness; and yet all this overpowered by the reigning love of sin. Drunkards and unclean persons have some faint desires to leave off their sins, and yet persist in them notwithstanding, such is the impotency and such the insufficiency of their convictions. Of such as these there are many that will needs have all this understood, and contend earnestly for it: though it is very hard to imagine why, if the apostle intended this, he should speak all along in his own person; and not only so, but in the present tense. Of his own state under conviction he had spoken at large, as of a thing past (Rom 7:7, etc.): I died; the commandment I found to be unto death; and if here he speaks of the same state as his present state, and the condition he was now in, surely he did not intend to be so understood: and therefore,

II. It seems rather to be understood of the struggles that are maintained between grace and corruption in sanctified souls. That there are remainders of indwelling corruption, even where there is a living principle of grace, is past dispute; that this corruption is daily breaking forth in sins of infirmity (such as are consistent with a state of grace) is no less certain. If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, Jo1 1:8, Jo1 1:10. That true grace strives against these sins and corruptions, does not allow of them, hates them, mourns over them, groans under them as a burden, is likewise certain (Gal 5:17): The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary the one to the other, so that you cannot do the things that you would. These are the truths which, I think, are contained in this discourse of the apostle. And his design is further to open the nature of sanctification, that it does not attain to a sinless perfection in this life; and therefore to quicken us to, and encourage us in, our conflicts with remaining corruptions. Our case is not singular, that which we do sincerely strive against, shall not be laid to our charge, and through grace the victory is sure at last. The struggle here is like that between Jacob and Esau in the womb, between the Canaanites and Israelites in the land, between the house of Saul and the house of David; but great is the truth and will prevail. Understanding it thus, we may observe here,

1.What he complains of - the remainder of indwelling corruptions, which he here speaks of, to show that the law is insufficient to justify even a regenerate man, that the best man in the world hath enough in him to condemn him, if God should deal with him according to the law, which is not the fault of the law, but of our own corrupt nature, which cannot fulfil the law. The repetition of the same things over and over again in this discourse shows how much Paul's heart was affected with what he wrote, and how deep his sentiments were. Observe the particulars of this complaint. (1.) I am carnal, sold under sin, Rom 7:14. He speaks of the Corinthians as carnal, Co1 3:1. Even where there is spiritual life there are remainders of carnal affections, and so far a man may be sold under sin; he does not sell himself to work wickedness, as Ahab did (Kg1 21:25), but he was sold by Adam when he sinned and fell - sold, as a poor slave that does his master's will against his own will - sold under sin, because conceived in iniquity and born in sin. (2.) What I would, that I do not; but what I hate, that do I, Rom 7:15. And to the same purport, Rom 7:19, Rom 7:21, When I would do good, evil is present with me. Such was the strength of corruptions, that he could not attain that perfection in holiness which he desired and breathed after. Thus, while he was pressing forward towards perfection, yet he acknowledges that he had not already attained, neither was already perfect, Phi 3:12. Fain he would be free from all sin, and perfectly do the will of God, such was his settled judgment; but his corrupt nature drew him another way: it was like a clog, that checked and kept him down when he would have soared upward, like the bias in a bowl, which, when it is thrown straight, yet draws it aside. (3.) In me, that is in my flesh, dwelleth no good, Rom 7:18. Here he explains himself concerning the corrupt nature, which he calls flesh; and as far as that goes there is no good to be expected, any more than one would expect good corn growing upon a rock, or on the sand which is by the sea-side. As the new nature, as far as that goes, cannot commit sin (Jo1 3:9), so the flesh, the old nature, as far as that goes, cannot perform a good duty. How should it? For the flesh serveth the law of sin (Rom 7:25), it is under the conduct and government of that law; and, while it is so, it is not likely to do any good. The corrupt nature is elsewhere called flesh (Gen 6:3, Joh 3:6); and, though there may be good things dwelling in those that have this flesh, yet, as far as the flesh goes, there is no good, the flesh is not a subject capable of any good. (4.) I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, Rom 7:23. The corrupt and sinful inclination is here compared to a law, because it controlled and checked him in his good motions. It is said to be seated in his members, because, Christ having set up his throne in his heart, it was only the rebellious members of the body that were the instruments of sin - in the sensitive appetite; or we may take it more generally for all that corrupt nature which is the seat not only of sensual but of more refined lusts. This wars against the law of the mind, the new nature; it draws the contrary way, drives on a contrary interest, which corrupt disposition and inclination are as great a burden and grief to the soul as the worst drudgery and captivity could be. It brings me into captivity. To the same purport (Rom 7:25), With the flesh I serve the law of sin; that is, the corrupt nature, the unregenerate part, is continually working towards sin. (5.) His general complaint we have in Rom 7:24, O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? The thing he complains of is a body of death; either the body of flesh, which is a mortal dying body (while we carry this body about with us, we shall be troubled with corruption; when we are dead, we shall be freed from sin, and not before), or the body of sin, the old man, the corrupt nature, which tends to death, that is, to the ruin of the soul. Or, comparing it to a dead body, the touch of which was by the ceremonial law defiling, if actual transgressions be dead works (Heb 9:14), original corruption is a dead body. It was as troublesome to Paul as if he had had a dead body tied to him, which he must have carried about with him. This made him cry out, O wretched man that I am! A man that had learned in every state to be content yet complains thus of his corrupt nature. Had I been required to speak of Paul, I should have said, "O blessed man that thou art, an ambassador of Christ, a favourite of heaven, a spiritual father of thousands!" But in his own account he was a wretched man, because of the corruption of nature, because he was not so good as he fain would be, had not yet attained, neither was already perfect. Thus miserably does he complain. Who shall deliver me? He speaks like one that was sick of it, that would give any thing to be rid of it, looks to the right hand and to the left for some friend that would part between him and his corruptions. The remainders of indwelling sin are a very grievous burden to a gracious soul.

2.What he comforts himself with. The case was sad, but there were some allays. Three things comforted him: -

(1.)That his conscience witnessed for him that he had a good principle ruling and prevailing in him, notwithstanding. It is well when all does not go one way in the soul. The rule of this good principle which he had was the law of God, to which he here speaks of having a threefold regard, which is certainly to be found in all that are sanctified, and no others. [1.] I consent unto the law that it is good, Rom 7:16, sumphēmi - I give my vote to the law; here is the approbation of the judgment. Wherever there is grace there is not only a dread of the severity of the law, but a consent to the goodness of the law. "It is a good in itself, it is good for me." This is a sign that the law is written in the heart, that the soul is delivered into the mould of it. To consent to the law is so far to approve of it as not to wish it otherwise constituted than it is. The sanctified judgment not only concurs to the equity of the law, but to the excellency of it, as convinced that a conformity to the law is the highest perfection of human nature, and the greatest honour and happiness we are capable of. [2.] I delight in the law of God after the inward man, Rom 7:22. His conscience bore witness to a complacency in the law. He delighted not only in the promises of the word, but in the precepts and prohibitions of the word; sunēdomai expresses a becoming delight. He did herein concur in affection with all the saints. All that are savingly regenerate or born again do truly delight in the law of God, delight to know it, to do it - cheerfully submit to the authority of it, and take a complacency in that submission, never better pleased than when heart and life are in the strictest conformity to the law and will of God. After the inward man; that is, First, The mind or rational faculties, in opposition to the sensitive appetites and wills of the flesh. The soul is the inward man, and that is the seat of gracious delights, which are therefore sincere and serious, but secret; it is the renewing of the inward man, Co2 4:16. Secondly, The new nature. The new man is called the inner man (Eph 3:16), the hidden man of the heart, Pe1 3:4. Paul, as far as he was sanctified, had a delight in the law of God. [3.] With the mind I myself serve the law of God, Rom 7:25. It is not enough to consent to the law, and to delight in the law, but we must serve the law; our souls must be entirely delivered up into the obedience of it. Thus it was with Paul's mind; thus it is with every sanctified renewed mind; this is the ordinary course and way; thitherward goes the bent of the soul. I myself - autos egō, plainly intimating that he speaks in his own person, and not in the person of another.

(2.)That the fault lay in that corruption of his nature which he did really bewail and strive against: It is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. This he mentions twice (Rom 7:17, Rom 7:20), not as an excuse for the guilt of his sin (it is enough to condemn us, if we were under the law, that the sin which does the evil dwelleth in us), but as a salvo for his evidences, that he might not sink in despair, but take comfort from the covenant of grace, which accepts the willingness of the spirit, and has provided pardon for the weakness of the flesh. He likewise herein enters a protestation against all that which this indwelling sin produced. Having professed his consent to the law of God, he here professes his dissent from the law of sin. "It is not I; I disown the fact; it is against my mind that it is done." As when in the senate the major part are bad, and carry every thing the wrong way, it is indeed the act of the senate, but the honest party strive against it, bewail what is done, and enter their protestation against it; so that it is no more they that do it. - Dwelleth in me, as the Canaanites among the Israelites, though they were put under tribute: dwelleth in me, and is likely to dwell there, while I live.

(3.)His great comfort lay in Jesus Christ (Rom 7:25): I thank God, through Jesus Christ our Lord. In the midst of his complaints he breaks out into praises. It is a special remedy against fears and sorrows to be much in praise: many a poor drooping soul hath found it so. And, in all our praises, this should be the burden of the son, "Blessed be God for Jesus Christ." Who shall deliver me? says he (Rom 7:24), as one at a loss for help. At length he finds an all-sufficient friend, even Jesus Christ. When we are under the sense of the remaining power of sin and corruption, we shall see reason to bless God through Christ (for, as he is the mediator of all our prayers, so he is of all our praises) - to bless God for Christ; it is he that stands between us and the wrath due to us for this sin. If it were not for Christ, this iniquity that dwells in us would certainly be our ruin. He is our advocate with the Father, and through him God pities, and spares, and pardons, and lays not our iniquities to our charge. It is Christ that has purchased deliverance for us in due time. Through Christ death will put an end to all these complaints, and waft us to an eternity which we shall spend without sin or sigh. Blessed be God that giveth us this victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 14–25. Public domain.
Copy as
IrenaeusAD 202
Against Heresies Book IV
Is the sign of our salvation, since it was the Lord Himself who saved them, because they could not be saved by their own instrumentality; and, therefore, when Paul sets forth human infirmity, he says: "For I know that there dwelleth in my flesh no good thing".
"to will is present with him, but he finds not means to perform"
Clement of AlexandriaAD 215
The Stromata Book 3
In what follows he continues, "But if I do that which I do not wish to do, it is no longer I that do it, but sin which dwells in me," which being at war with the law of God and "of my mind," he says, "makes me captive by the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from this body of death."
TertullianAD 220
On Modesty
"For as ye have tendered your members to servile impurity and iniquity, so too now tender them servants to righteousness unto holiness." For even if he has affirmed that "good dwelleth not in his flesh," yet (he means) according to "the law of the letter," in which he "was: "but according to "the law of the Spirit," to which he annexes us, he frees us from the "infirmity of the flesh.
TertullianAD 220
Of Patience
I Fully confess unto the Lord God that it has been rash enough, if not even impudent, in me to have dared compose a treatise on Patience, for practising which I am all unfit, being a man of no goodness; whereas it were becoming that such as have addressed themselves to the demonstration and commendation of some particular thing, should themselves first be conspicuous in the practice of that thing, and should regulate the constancy of their commonishing by the authority of their personal conduct, for fear their words blush at the deficiency of their deeds.
AmbrosiasterAD 384
COMMENTARY ON PAUL’S EPISTLES
Paul does not say that the flesh is evil, as some think, but that what dwells in the flesh is not good, i.e., sin. How does sin dwell in the flesh when it is not a substance but the perversion of what is good? Since the body of the first man was corrupted by sin and became dissolvable, this same corruption of sin remains in the body because of the state of transgression, retaining the strength of the divine judgment given in Adam, which is the sign of the devil, at whose prompting Adam sinned. Because of this sin is said to dwell in the flesh, to which the devil comes as if to his own kingdom. For the flesh is sinful and sin remains in it in order to deceive man by evil temptations, so that man will not do what the law commands.Man can agree that what the law commands is good; he can say that it naturally pleases him and that he wants to do it. But in spite of all that, the power and the strength to carry out his wishes is lacking because he is so oppressed by the power of sin that he cannot go where he wants nor can he make contrary decisions, because another power is in control of him. For man is burdened by his habit of sinning and succumbs to sin more readily than to the law, which he knows teaches what is good. For if he wants to do what is good, habit backed by the enemy prevents him.
John ChrysostomAD 407
Homily on Romans 13
On this text, those who find fault with the flesh, and contend it was no part of God's creation, attack us. What are we to say then? Just what we did before, when discussing the Law: that as there he makes sin answerable for everything so here also. For he does not say, that the flesh worketh it, but just the contrary, "it is not I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me." But if he does say that "there dwelleth no good thing in it," still this is no charge against the flesh. For the fact that "no good thing dwelleth in it," does not show that it is evil itself. Now we admit, that the flesh is not so great as the soul, and is inferior to it, yet not contrary, or opposed to it, or evil; but that it is beneath the soul, as a harp beneath a harper, and as a ship under the pilot. And these are not contrary to those who guide and use them, but go with them entirely, yet are not of the same honor with the artist. As then a person who says, that the art resides not in the harp or the ship, but in the pilot or harper, is not finding fault with the instruments, but pointing out the great difference between them and the artist; so Paul in saying, that "in my flesh dwelleth no good thing," is not finding fault with the body, but pointing out the soul's superiority. For this it is that has the whole duty of pilotage put into its hands, and that of playing. And this Paul here points out, giving the governing power to the soul, and after dividing man into these two things, the soul and the body, he says, that the flesh has less of reason, and is destitute of discretion, and ranks among things to be led, not among things that lead. But the soul has more wisdom, and can see what is to be done and what not, yet is not equal to pulling in the horse as it wishes. And this would be a charge not against the flesh only, but against the soul also, which knows indeed what it ought to do, but still does not carry out in practice what seems best to it. "For to will," he says, "is present with me; but how to perform that which is good, I find not." Here again in the words, "I find not," he does not speak of any ignorance or perplexity, but a kind of thwarting and crafty assault made by sin, which he therefore points more clearly out in the next words.
PelagiusAD 418
PELAGIUS’S COMMENTARY ON ROMANS
Paul does not say that his flesh is not good. The will is there but not the action, because carnal habit opposes the will.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
On Continence 3.6
It is possible for a good to be performed when there is no yielding to evil lust, but the good is completed or perfected only when evil lust itself no longer exists.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
On Continence 8.19
Paul says that the evil of the flesh is not good but that when this evil has ceased to exist the flesh will still be there, but … then it will not be defective or corrupt.
Prosper of AquitaineAD 455
GRACE AND FREE WILL 4.2
Although Paul has received the knowledge of right willing, he cannot find in himself the power to do what he wills. It is not until he receives a good will as a gift that he finds the power for the virtues which he seeks.
JRR TolkienAD 1973
Letter #250, The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, To Michael Tolkien 1963
For myself, I find I become less cynical rather than more – remembering my own sins and follies; and realize that men's hearts are not often as bad as their acts, and very seldom as bad as their words. (Especially in our age, which is one of sneer and cynicism. We are freer from hypocrisy, since it does not 'do' to profess holiness or utter high sentiments; but it is one of inverted hypocrisy like the widely current inverted snobbery: men profess to be worse than they are.).
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Romans 7:18 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.