Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 the devil G1228 said G2036 unto him G846, If G1487 thou be G1488 the Son G5207 of God G2316, command G2036 this G5129 stone G3037 that G2443 it be made G1096 bread G740.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
The Adversary said to him, "If you are the Son of God, order this stone to become bread."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
The devil said to Him, “If You are the Son of God, tell this stone to become bread.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And the devil said unto him, If thou art the Son of God, command this stone that it become bread.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
The devil said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become bread.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then the deuil saide vnto him, If thou be the Sonne of God, commaund this stone that it be made bread.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and the Devil said to him, `If Son thou art of God, speak to this stone that it may become bread.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem)
All Luke Sites (Jerusalem) View full PDF
Luke 4:1-12
Luke 4:1-12 View full PDF
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Luke Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 25,067 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Luke 4:3 records the initial and pivotal temptation of Jesus by the devil in the wilderness, immediately following his baptism and the divine affirmation of his identity as the Son of God. The devil challenges Jesus, who is physically weakened by a forty-day fast, to use his divine power for personal gratification by miraculously transforming a stone into bread. This encounter sets the stage for Jesus' public ministry, demonstrating his perfect obedience and reliance on God's Word in the face of direct assault from the enemy.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated at the very beginning of Jesus' public ministry in Luke's Gospel, directly following his baptism and the descent of the Holy Spirit, where a voice from heaven declared, "Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased" (Luke 3:22). Immediately after this divine affirmation, Jesus is "full of the Holy Spirit" and "led by the Spirit into the wilderness" for forty days, where he "was tempted of the devil" and "did eat nothing" during that time. The temptation in Luke 4:3 is the first of three direct confrontations, strategically occurring when Jesus is at his most physically vulnerable, thereby testing his identity and mission. His responses, rooted in Scripture, establish a pattern of perfect obedience that contrasts with Israel's failures in the wilderness.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The wilderness (ἔρημος, erēmos) in biblical tradition is often a place of testing, purification, and divine encounter. Israel's forty years in the wilderness, for instance, were a period of testing their obedience and dependence on God (Deuteronomy 8:2-3). Moses and Elijah also experienced forty-day fasts in the wilderness, preparing them for significant divine encounters and ministries (Exodus 34:28 and 1 Kings 19:8). Jesus' forty-day fast aligns with these precedents, signifying a period of intense spiritual preparation and reliance on God, but also leaving him profoundly hungry and physically weak. This vulnerability makes the devil's temptation to turn stones into bread particularly potent, appealing directly to a basic human need in a desolate environment.
  • Key Themes: This verse contributes significantly to several key themes within Luke's Gospel and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it underscores the theme of Jesus' identity as the Son of God, which the devil directly challenges. The temptation is not merely about food but about Jesus' willingness to operate outside the Father's will and timing, thereby proving or disproving his divine sonship on the devil's terms. Secondly, it highlights the theme of obedience and trust in God's provision. Jesus' refusal to use his power for self-gratification demonstrates perfect reliance on God, even in extreme hunger, contrasting with humanity's historical tendency to succumb to immediate desires. Lastly, it introduces the theme of spiritual warfare, portraying the devil as a real, active adversary who seeks to derail God's redemptive plan by tempting Jesus to misuse his power and abandon his mission. Jesus' victory here foreshadows his ultimate triumph over evil (Luke 10:18).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • devil (Greek, diábolos', G1228): This term means "a traducer," "false accuser," or "slanderer." It is specifically used to refer to Satan. This name powerfully describes his character and method: he is not merely an opposing force but one who seeks to undermine, discredit, and accuse, often through deception and questioning God's truth or intentions. Here, he slanders God's provision and challenges Jesus' integrity.
  • If (Greek, ei', G1487): This is a primary particle of conditionality, meaning "if" or "whether." While seemingly a simple conditional, in this context, it functions less as a genuine question of Jesus' identity and more as an insinuation or a challenge. The devil isn't seeking information; he's attempting to provoke Jesus into an action that would demonstrate a lack of trust in the Father or a misuse of his divine power. It's a test designed to elicit a response that deviates from God's perfect will.
  • be made (Greek, gínomai', G1096): This verb means "to cause to be," "to become," or "to come into being." In this command, the devil urges Jesus to actively "make" or "cause" the stone to "become" bread. This highlights the temptation to use divine power for an immediate, self-serving purpose rather than for the Father's ordained plan. The emphasis is on Jesus' agency in bringing about a transformation for personal comfort, bypassing the path of suffering and divine provision.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And the devil said unto him,": This clause establishes the direct confrontation between Jesus and the devil, emphasizing the personal nature of the temptation. The devil is not merely a force of evil but a sentient, malevolent being who engages in direct communication and strategic assault.
  • "If thou be the Son of God,": This is the core of the devil's challenge. It's not a genuine inquiry into Jesus' identity, which was just affirmed by God at his baptism. Instead, it's a taunt designed to sow doubt and provoke Jesus to "prove" his sonship on the devil's terms, by acting independently of the Father's will and timing. It's an attempt to shift Jesus' reliance from God's word and plan to his own immediate power and gratification.
  • "command this stone that it be made bread.": This is the specific action the devil proposes. It appeals directly to Jesus' physical hunger after forty days of fasting. The temptation is to use divine power (to "command" a miracle) for personal comfort and immediate relief, rather than enduring the trial and waiting for God's provision. This act would signify a departure from the path of humble obedience and self-denial that characterized Jesus' mission.

Literary Devices

Luke 4:3 employs several powerful literary devices. Irony is evident in the devil's challenge; he addresses Jesus as "Son of God," a title affirmed by God himself just prior to this encounter, yet he simultaneously tempts Jesus to act in a way that would undermine the very nature of that sonship—one of perfect obedience and dependence. The devil's words are a perversion of truth. Symbolism is also at play, where "bread" symbolizes not just physical sustenance but also the means of life and provision. The temptation is to secure life on one's own terms, rather than through God's Word and will, which Jesus later affirms as true sustenance (Luke 4:4). Finally, there is a clear antithesis between the devil's proposal and Jesus' divine mission. The devil offers a path of immediate gratification and self-reliance, directly opposing Jesus' path of humble obedience, self-sacrifice, and reliance on the Father for the redemption of humanity.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

The temptation of Jesus in Luke 4:3 profoundly connects to the broader biblical narrative of humanity's relationship with God, particularly the themes of obedience, trust, and the nature of true sustenance. Just as Adam and Eve were tempted in the Garden to disobey God's command and seek knowledge/life on their own terms, and Israel repeatedly failed in the wilderness to trust God's provision, Jesus perfectly models faithful obedience. His refusal to turn stones into bread underscores that human life is not sustained by physical means alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God. This highlights a fundamental theological truth: true life and fulfillment come from aligning with God's will and trusting His timing and methods, rather than succumbing to immediate desires or misusing divine power for selfish ends. Jesus' victory over this temptation foreshadows his ultimate triumph over sin and death, establishing him as the obedient Son who fulfills what humanity failed to do.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Luke 4:3 offers profound insights into the nature of temptation and the pathway to spiritual victory for believers today. The devil often attacks when we are most vulnerable, whether physically, emotionally, or spiritually, seeking to exploit our weaknesses and sow doubt about our identity in Christ. He challenges us to prove our worth or secure our comfort by means that bypass God's will or timing. Just as Jesus was tempted to use his divine power for personal gain, we are often tempted to rely on our own strength, resources, or cleverness instead of trusting God's provision and perfect plan. This verse calls us to examine where we seek our sustenance and security. Do we look to immediate gratification, worldly solutions, or our own abilities, or do we, like Jesus, anchor ourselves in the Word of God and trust in the Father's unfailing care? Our identity as children of God is not contingent on our performance or our ability to manipulate circumstances, but on God's gracious declaration.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life are you most vulnerable to temptation, and how might the devil exploit those weaknesses?
  • How does the devil's challenge, "If thou be the Son of God," resonate with the doubts or insecurities you sometimes face about your identity in Christ?
  • What "stones" are you tempted to turn into "bread" in your life—that is, what immediate solutions or comforts do you seek instead of waiting on God's provision and trusting His timing?

FAQ

Why did the devil begin with "If thou be the Son of God" instead of just directly tempting Jesus with food?

Answer: The devil's opening phrase, "If thou be the Son of God," is highly strategic and deeply significant. It's not a genuine question about Jesus' identity, which had just been powerfully affirmed by God at his baptism (Luke 3:22). Instead, it serves as a challenge and an insinuation, aiming to undermine Jesus' confidence in his divine sonship or to provoke him into an act of disobedience. By prefacing the command with this conditional statement, the devil attempts to:

  1. Sow Doubt: Despite the divine affirmation, the devil tries to introduce a sliver of doubt, forcing Jesus to "prove" his identity on the devil's terms.
  2. Challenge Authority/Trust: It implies that if Jesus truly is the Son of God, he should be able to alleviate his suffering immediately, without relying on the Father's timing or method. This challenges Jesus' trust in God's provision and the path of humble obedience.
  3. Misdirect Power: The temptation is not just to eat, but to use his divine power for self-gratification rather than for the Father's will and the kingdom's purposes. The "if" clause is a psychological manipulation, urging Jesus to act out of a need to validate himself, rather than out of perfect submission to God. This sets the stage for the subsequent temptations, all of which revolve around Jesus' identity and the proper use of his divine authority.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Luke 4:3 reveals Jesus as the perfect Son who fulfills what Adam failed to do in the Garden and what Israel failed to do in the wilderness. Where humanity succumbed to temptation, seeking autonomy and immediate gratification, Jesus perfectly obeyed the Father, even in extreme physical weakness. His refusal to turn stones into bread demonstrates his complete reliance on God's Word as the true source of life and sustenance, establishing him as the obedient "last Adam" (1 Corinthians 15:45). This victory in the wilderness is a foundational moment, demonstrating Jesus' qualification to be our High Priest, one who "was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin" (Hebrews 4:15). His perfect obedience in the face of temptation is not merely an example for us to follow, but a redemptive act. Through his sinless life and ultimate sacrifice, Jesus earned the righteousness that is imputed to believers, reversing the curse of Adam's disobedience (Romans 5:19). He is the one who has "destroyed the works of the devil" (1 John 3:8), beginning with this decisive victory in the wilderness, paving the way for our deliverance from sin and the power of the enemy.

Copy as

Commentary on Luke 4 verses 1–13

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details[1.] [2.] Fine details

The last words of the foregoing chapter, that Jesus was the Son of Adam, bespeak him to be the seed of the woman; being so, we have here, according to the promise, breaking the serpent's head, baffling and foiling the devil in all his temptations, who by one temptation had baffled and foiled our first parents. Thus, in the beginning of the war, he made reprisals upon him, and conquered the conqueror.

In this story of Christ's temptation, observe,

I. How he was prepared and fitted for it. He that designed him the trial furnished him accordingly; for though we know not what exercises may be before us, nor what encounters we may be reserved for, Christ did, and was provided accordingly; and God doth for us, and we hope will provide accordingly.

1.He was full of the Holy Ghost, who had descended on him like a dove. He had now greater measures of the gifts, graces, and comforts, of the Holy Ghost than ever before. Note, Those are well armed against the strongest temptations that are full of the Holy Ghost.

2.He was newly returned from Jordan, where he was baptized, and owned by a voice from heaven to be the beloved Son of God; and thus he was prepared for this combat. Note, When we have had the most comfortable communion with God, and the clearest discoveries of his favour to us, we may expect that Satan will set upon us (the richest ship is the pirate's prize), and that God will suffer him to do so, that the power of his grace may be manifested and magnified.

3.He was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, by the good Spirit, who led him as a champion into the field, to fight the enemy that he was sure to conquer. His being led into the wilderness, (1.) Gave some advantage to the tempter; for there he had him alone, no friend with him, by whose prayers and advice he might be assisted in the hour of temptation. Woe to him that is alone! He might give Satan advantage, who knew his own strength; we may not, who know our own weakness. (2.) He gained some advantage to himself, during his forty days' fasting in the wilderness. We may suppose that he was wholly taken up in proper meditation, and in consideration of his own undertaking, and the work he had before him; that he spent all his time in immediate, intimate, converse with his Father, as Moses in the mount, without any diversion, distraction, or interruption. Of all the days of Christ's life in the flesh, these seem to come nearest to the angelic perfection and the heavenly life, and this prepared him for Satan's assaults, and hereby he was fortified against them.

4.He continued fasting (Luk 4:2): In those days he did eat nothing. This fast was altogether miraculous, like those of Moses and Elijah, and shows him to be, like them, a prophet sent of God. It is probable that it was in the wilderness of Horeb, the same wilderness in which Moses and Elijah fasted. As by retiring into the wilderness he showed himself perfectly indifferent to the world, so by his fasting he showed himself perfectly indifferent to the body; and Satan cannot easily take hold of those who are thus loosened fRom. and dead to, the world and the flesh. The more we keep under the body, and bring it into subjection, the less advantage Satan has against us.

II. How he was assaulted by one temptation after another, and how he defeated the design of the tempter in every assault, and became more than a conqueror. During the forty days, he was tempted of the devil (Luk 4:2), not by an inward suggestion, for the prince of this world had nothing in Christ by which to inject any such, but by outward solicitations, perhaps in the likeness of a serpent, as he tempted our first parents. But at the end of the forty days he came nearer to him, and did as it were close with him, when he perceived that he was hungry, Luk 4:2. Probably, our Lord Jesus then began to look about among the trees, to see if he could find any thing that was eatable, whence the devil took occasion to make the following proposal to him.

1.He tempted him to distrust his Father's care of him, and to set up for himself, and shift for provision for himself in such a way as his Father had not appointed for him (Luk 4:3): If thou be the Son of God, as the voice from heaven declared, command this stone to be made bread. (1.) "I counsel thee to do it; for God, if he be thy Father, has forgotten thee, and it will be long enough ere he sends either ravens or angels to feed thee." If we begin to think of being our own carvers, and of living by our own forecast, without depending upon divine providence, of getting wealth by our might and the power of our hands, we must look upon it as a temptation of Satan's, and reject it accordingly; it is Satan's counsel to think of an independence upon God. (2.) "I challenge thee to do it, if thou canst; if thou dost not do it, I will say thou art not the Son of God; for John Baptist said lately, God is able of stones to raise up children to Abraham, which is the greater; thou therefore hast not the power of the Son of God, if thou dost not of stones make bread for thyself, when thou needest it, which is the less." Thus was God himself tempted in the wilderness: Can he furnish a table? Can he give bread? Psa 78:19, Psa 78:20.

Now, [1.] Christ yielded not to the temptation; he would not turn that stone into bread; no, though he was hungry; First, Because he would not do what Satan bade him do, for that would have looked as if there had been indeed a compact between him and the prince of the devils. Note, We must not do any thing that looks like giving place to the devil. Miracles were wrought for the confirming of faith, and the devil had no faith to be confirmed, and therefore he would not do it for him. He did his signs in the presence of his disciples (Joh 20:30), and particularly the beginning of his miracles, turning water into wine, which he did, that his disciples might believe on him (Joh 2:11); but here in the wilderness he had no disciples with him. Secondly, He wrought miracles for the ratification of his doctrine, and therefore till he began to preach he would not begin to work miracles. Thirdly, He would not work miracles for himself and his own supply, lest he should seem impatient of hunger, whereas he came not to please himself, but to suffer grief, and that grief among others; and because he would show that he pleased not himself, he would rather turn water into wine, for the credit and convenience of his friends, than stones into bread, for his own necessary supply. Fourthly, He would reserve the proof of his being the Son of God for hereafter, and would rather be upbraided by Satan with being weak, and not able to do it, than be persuaded by Satan to do that which it was fit for him to do; thus he was upbraided by his enemies as if he could not save himself, and come down from the cross, when he could have come down, but would not, because it was not fit that he should. Fifthly, He would not do any thing that looked like distrust of his Father, or acting separately from him, or any thing disagreeable to his present state. Being in all things made like unto his brethren, he would, like the other children of God, live in a dependence upon the divine Providence and promise, and trust him either to send him a supply into the wilderness or to lead him to a city of habitation where there was a supply, as he used to do (Psa 107:5-7), and in the mean time would support him, though he was hungry, as he had done these forty days past.

[2.]He returned a scripture-answer to it (Luk 4:4): It is written. This is the first word recorded as spoken by Christ after his instalment in his prophetical office; and it is a quotation out of the Old Testament, to show that he came to assert and maintain the authority of the scripture as uncontrollable, even by Satan himself. And though he had the Spirit without measure, and had a doctrine of his own to preach and a religion to found, yet it agreed with Moses and the prophets, whose writings he therefore lays down as a rule to himself, and recommends to us as a reply to Satan and his temptations. The word of God is our sword, and faith in that word is our shield; we should therefore be mighty in the scriptures, and go in that might, go forth, and go on, in our spiritual warfare, know what is written, for it is for our learning, for our use. The text of scripture he makes use of is quoted from Deu 8:3 : "Man shall not live by bread alone. I need not turn the stone into bread, for God can send manna for my nourishment, as he did for Israel; man can live by every word of God, by whatever God will appoint that he shall live by." How had Christ lived, lived comfortably, these last forty days? Not by bread, but by the word of God, by meditation upon that word, and communion with it, and with God in and by it; and in like manner he could live yet, though now he began to be hungry. God has many ways of providing for his people, without the ordinary means of subsistence; and therefore he is not at any time to be distrusted, but at all times to be depended upon, in the way of duty. If meat be wanting, God can take away the appetite, or give such degrees of patience as will enable a man even to laugh at destruction and famine (Job 5:22), or make pulse and water more nourishing than all the portion of the king's meat (Dan 1:12, Dan 1:13), and enable his people to rejoice in the Lord, when the fig-tree doth not blossom, Hab 3:17. She was an active believer who said that she had made many a meal's meat of the promises when she wanted bread.

2.He tempted him to accept from him the kingdom, which, as the Son of God, he expected to receive from his Father, and to do him homage for, Luk 4:5-7. This evangelist puts this temptation second, which Matthew had put last, and which, it should seem, was really the last; but Luke was full of it, as the blackest and most violent, and therefore hastened to it. In the devil's tempting of our first parents, he presented to them the forbidden fruit, first as good for food, and then as pleasant to the eyes; and they were overpowered by both these charms. Satan here first tempted Christ to turn the stones into bread, which would be good for food, and then showed him the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them, which were pleasant to the eyes; but in both these he overpowered Satan, and perhaps with an eye to that, Luke changes the order. Now observe,

(1.)How Satan managed this temptation, to prevail with Christ to become a tributary to him, and to receive his kingdom by delegation from him.

[1.]He gave him a prospect of all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time, an airy representation of them, such as he thought most likely to strike the fancy, and seem a real prospect. To succeed the better, he took him up for this purpose into a high mountain; and, because we next after the temptation find Christ on the other side Jordan, some think it probable that it was to the top of Pisgah that the devil took him, whence Moses has a sight of Canaan. That it was but a phantasm that the devil here presented our Saviour with, as the prince of the power of the air, is confirmed by that circumstance which Luke here takes notice of, that it was done in a moment of time; whereas, if a man take a prospect of but one country, he must do it successively, must turn himself round, and take a view first of one part and then of another. Thus the devil thought to impose upon our Saviour with a fallacy - a deceptio visus; and, by making him believe that he could show him all the kingdoms of the world, would draw him into an opinion that he could give him all those kingdoms.

[2.]He boldly alleged that these kingdoms were all delivered to him that he had power to dispose of them and all their glory, and to give them to whomsoever he would, Luk 4:6. Some think that herein he pretended to be an angel of light, and that, as one of the angels that was set over the kingdoms, he had out-bought, or out-fought, all the rest, and so was entrusted with the disposal of them all, and, in God's name, would give them to him, knowing they were designed for him; but clogged with this condition, that he should fall down and worship him, which a good angel would have been so far from demanding that he would not have admitted it, no, not upon showing much greater things than these, as appears, Rev 19:10; Rev 22:9. But I rather take it that he claimed this power as Satan, and as delivered to him not by the Lord, but by the kings and people of these kingdoms, who gave their power and honour to the devil, Eph 2:2. Hence he is called the god of this world, and the prince of this world. It was promised to the Son of God that he should have the heathen for his inheritance, Psa 2:8. "Why," saith the devil, "the heathen are mine, are my subjects and votaries; but, however, they shall be thine, I will give them thee, upon condition that thou worship me for them, and say that they are the rewards which I have given thee, as others have done before thee (Hos 2:12), and consent to have and hold them by, fRom. and under, me."

[3.]He demanded of him homage and adoration: If thou wilt worship me, all shall be thine, Luk 4:7. First, He would have him worship him himself. Perhaps he does not mean so as never to worship God, but let him worship him in conjunction with God; for the devil knows, if he can but once come in a partner, he shall soon be sole proprietor. Secondly, He would indent with him, that when, according to the promise made to him, he had got possession of the kingdoms of this world, he should make no alteration of religions in them, but permit and suffer the nations, as they had done hitherto, to sacrifice to devils (Co1 10:20); that he should still keep up demon-worship in the world, and then let him take all the power and glory of the kingdoms if he pleased. Let who will take the wealth and grandeur of this earth, Satan has all he would have if he can but have men's hearts, and affections, and adorations, can but work in the children of disobedience; for then he effectually devours them.

(2.)How our Lord Jesus triumphed over this temptation. He gave it a peremptory repulse, rejected it with abhorrence (Luk 4:8): "Get thee behind me, Satan, I cannot bear the mention of it. What! worship the enemy of God whom I came to serve? and of man whom I came to save? No, I will never do it." Such a temptation as this was not to be reasoned with, but immediately refused; it was presently knocked on the head with one word, It is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God; and not only so, but him only, him and no other. And therefore Christ will not worship Satan, nor, when he has the kingdoms of the world delivered to him by his Father, as he expects shortly to have, will he suffer any remains of the worship of the devil to continue in them. No, it shall be perfectly rooted out and abolished, wherever his gospel comes. He will make no composition with him. Polytheism and idolatry must go down, as Christ's kingdom gets up. Men must be turned from the power of Satan unto God, from the worship of devils to the worship of the only living and true God. This is the great divine law that Christ will re-establish among men, and by his holy religion reduce men to the obedience of, That God only is to be served and worshipped; and therefore whoever set up any creature as the object of religious worship, though it were a saint or an angel, or the virgin Mary herself, they directly thwart Christ's design, and relapse into heathenism.

3.He tempted him to be his own murderer, in a presumptuous confidence of his Father's protection, such as he had no warrant for. Observe,

(1.)What he designed in this temptation: If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down, Luk 4:9. [1.] He would have him seek for a new proof of his being the Son of God, as if that which his Father had given him by the voice from heaven, and the descent of the Spirit upon him, were not sufficient, which would have been a dishonour to God, as if he had not chosen the most proper way of giving him the assurance of it; and it would have argued a distrust of the Spirit's dwelling in him, which was the great and most convincing proof to himself of his being the Son of God, Heb 1:8, Heb 1:9. [2.] He would have him seek a new method of proclaiming and publishing this to the world. The devil, in effect, suggests that it was in an obscure corner that he was attested to be the Son of God, among a company of ordinary people, who attended John's baptism, that his honours were proclaimed; but if he would now declare from the pinnacle of the temple, among all the great people who attend the temple-service, that he was the Son of God, and then, for proof of it, throw himself down unhurt, he would presently be received by every body as a messenger sent from heaven. Thus Satan would have him seek honours of his devising (in contempt of those which God had put on him), and manifest himself in the temple at Jerusalem; whereas God designed he should be more manifest among John's penitents, to whom his doctrine would be more welcome than to the priests. [3.] It is probable he had some hopes that, though he could not throw him down, to do him the least mischief, yet, if he would but throw himself down, the fall might be his death, and then he should have got him finely out of the way.

(2.)How he backed and enforced this temptation. He suggested, It is written, Luk 4:10. Christ had quoted scripture against him; and he thought he would be quits with him, and would show that he could quote scripture as well as he. It has been usual with heretics and seducers to pervert scripture, and to press the sacred writings into the service of the worst of wickednesses. He shall give his angels charge over thee, if thou be his Son, and in their hands they shall bear thee up. And now that he was upon the pinnacle of the temple he might especially expect this ministration of angels; for, if he was the Son of God, the temple was the proper place for him to be in (Luk 2:46); and, if any place under the sun had a guard of angels constantly, it must needs be that, Psa 68:17. It is true, God has promised the protection of angels, to encourage us to trust him, not to tempt him; as far as the promise of God's presence with us, so far the promise of the angels' ministration goes, but no further: "They shall keep thee when thou goest on the ground, where thy way lies, but not if thou wilt presume to fly in the air."

(3.)How he was baffled and defeated in the temptation, Luk 4:12. Christ quoted Deu 6:16, where it is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God, by desiring a sign for the proof of divine revelation, when he has already given that which is sufficient; for so Israel did, when they tempted God in the wilderness, saying, He gave us water out of the rock; but can he give flesh also? This Christ would be guilty of if he should say, "He did indeed prove me to be the Son of God, by sending the Spirit upon me, which is the greater; but can he also give his angels a charge concerning me, which is the less?"

III. What was the result and issue of this combat, Luk 4:13. Our victorious Redeemer kept his ground, and came off a conqueror, not for himself only, but for us also.

1.The devil emptied his quiver: He ended all the temptation. Christ gave him opportunity to say and do all he could against him; he let him try all his force, and yet defeated him. Did Christ suffer, being tempted, till all the temptation was ended? And must not we expect also to pass all our trials, to go through the hour of temptation assigned us?

2.He then quitted the field: He departed from him. He saw it was to no purpose to attack him; he had nothing in him for his fiery darts to fasten upon; he had no blind side, no weak or unguarded part in his wall, and therefore Satan gave up the cause. Note, If we resist the devil, he will flee from us.

3.Yet he continued his malice against him, and departed with a resolution to attack him again; he departed but for a season, achri kairou - till a season, or till the season when he was again to be let loose upon him, not as a tempter, to draw him to sin, and so to strike at his head, which was what he now aimed at and was wholly defeated in; but as a persecutor, to bring him to suffer by Judas and the other wicked instruments whom he employed, and so to bruise his heel, which it was told him (Gen 3:15) he should have to do, and would do, though it would be the breaking of his own head. He departed now till that season came which Christ calls the power of darkness (Luk 22:53), and when the prince of this world would again come, Joh 14:30.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–13. Public domain.
Copy as
IrenaeusAD 202
Against Heresies Book IV
And the devil looking at Him, and tempting Him, said: "If Thou art the Son of God; "
TertullianAD 220
On Fasting
By and by the Lord Himself consecrated His own baptism (and, in His own, that of all) by fasts; having (the power) to make "loaves out of stones," say, to make Jordan flow with wine perchance, if He had been such a "glutton and toper.
Origen of Alexandria (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 253
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
When a father is asked by his son for bread, he does not give him a stone for bread, but the devil like a crafty and deceitful foe gives stones for bread.

I suppose also that even now at this very time the devil shows a stone to men that he may tempt them to speak, saying to them, Command this stone to be made bread. If thou seest the heretics devouring their lying doctrines as if they were bread, know that their teaching is a stone which the devil shows them.
Basil of Caesarea (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 379
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
For not by word provoking the enemy, but by His actions rousing him, He seeks the wilderness. For the devil delights in the wilderness, he is not wont to go into the cities, the harmony of the citizens troubles him.

Or, the Lord remained for forty days untempted, for the devil knew that He fasted, yet hungered not, and dared not therefore approach Him. Hence it follows: And he eat nothing in those days. He fasted indeed, to show that He who would gird Himself for struggles against temptation must be temperate and sober.

(ex Const. Mon.) But we must not however so use the flesh, that through want of food our strength should waste away, nor that by excess of mortification our understandings wax dull and heavy. Our Lord therefore, once performed this work, but during this whole succeeding time He governed His body with due order, and so in like manner did Moses and Elias.

(ubi sup.) But because not to suffer hunger is above the nature of man, our Lord took upon Himself the feeling of hunger, and submitted Himself as it pleased Him to human nature, both to do and to suffer those things which were His own. Hence it follows: And those days being ended, he was a hungered. Not forced to that necessity which overpowers nature, but as if provoking the devil to the conflict. For the devil, knowing that wherever hunger is there is weakness, sets about to tempt Him, and as the deviser or inventer of temptations, Christ permitting him tries to persuade Him to satisfy His appetite with the stones. As it follows; But the devil said unto him, If thou art the Son of God, command these stones that they be made bread.

(ubi sup.) He tried to persuade Christ to satisfy His appetite with stones, i. e. to shift his desire from the natural food to that which was beyond nature or unnatural.

(ubi sup.) But Christ while He vanquishes temptation, banishes not hunger from our nature, as though that were the cause of evils, (which is rather the preservative of life, but confining nature within its proper bounds, shows of what kind its nourishment is, as follows; And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone.
Gregory of Nazianzus (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 390
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Orat. 40.) He fasted in truth forty days, eating nothing. (For He was God.) But we regulate our fasting according to our strength, although the zeal of some persuades them to fast beyond what they are able.

(Poem. Mor. x. 624.) For the body nourishes not our immaterial nature.
Gregory of Nyssa (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 395
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(in Eccles. Hom. 5.) Virtue then is not sustained by bread, nor by flesh does the soul keep itself in health and vigour, but by other banquets than these is the heavenly life fostered, and increased. The nourishment of the good man is chastity, his bread, wisdom, his herbs, justice, his drink, freedom from passion, his delight, (εὐφροσύνη quasi ex εὐφρόνειν) to be rightly wise.
Ambrose of Milan (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 397
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
He was led therefore into the wilderness, to the intent that He might provoke the devil, for if the one had not contended, the other it seems had not conquered. In a mystery, it was to deliver that Adam from exile who was cast out of Paradise into the wilderness. By way of example, it was to show us that the devil envies us, whenever we strive after better things; and that then we must use caution, lest the weakness of our minds should lose us the grace of the mystery. Hence it follows: And he was tempted of the devil.

There are three things which united together conduce to the salvation of man; The Sacrament, The Wilderness, Fasting. No one who has not rightly contended receives a crown, but no one is admitted to the contest of virtue, except first being washed from the stains of all his sins, he is consecrated with the gift of heavenly grace.

But mark the mystical number of days. For you remember that for forty days the waters of the deep were poured forth, and by sanctifying a fast of that number of days, He brings before us the returning mercies of a calmer sky. By a fast of so many days also, Moses earned for himself the understanding of the law. Our fathers being for so many years settled in the wilderness, obtained the food of Angels.

There are three especial weapons which we are taught the devil is wont to arm himself with, that he may wound the soul of man. One is of the appetite, another of boasting, the third ambition. He began with that wherewith he had already conquered, namely, Adam. Let us then beware of the appetite, let us beware of luxury, for it is a weapon of the devil. But what mean his words, If thou art the Son of God, unless he had known that the Son would come, but supposed Him not to have come from the weakness of His body. He first endeavours to find Him out, then to tempt Him. He professes to trust Him as God, then tries to deceive Him as man.

You see then what kind of arms He uses to defend man against the assaults of spiritual wickedness, and the allurements of the appetite. He does not exert His power as God, (for how had that profited me,) but as man He summons to Himself a common aid, that while intent upon the food of divine reading He may neglect the hunger of the body, and gain the nourishment of the word. For he who seeks after the word cannot feel the want of earthly bread; for divine things doubtless make up for the loss of human. At the same time by saying, Man lives not by bread alone, He shows that man was tempted, that is, our flesh which He assumed, not His own divinity.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
Commentary on Luke
So, look at the arms of Christ with which he conquered for you, not for himself. For he who showed that stones could, through his majesty, be changed into bread by the transformation into a different nature, teaches that you must do nothing at the devil’s behalf nor for the purpose of manifesting virtue. At the same time, learn from the temptation itself the ingenious cunning of the devil. The devil tempts that he may test. He tests that he may tempt. In contrast, the Lord deceives that he may conquer. He conquers that he may deceive. For if he had changed nature, he would have betrayed its Creator. Thus he responded neutrally, saying, “It is written, ‘That man lives not by bread alone, but by every word of God.’ ” You see what kind of arms he wields, to defend humanity, surrounded and protected against the inducements of appetite, against the assault of spiritual wickedness. For he does not wield power as God—for what good would that be to me? So, as man, he summons common help for himself, so that eager for the food of the divine Word, he neglects the body’s hunger and obtains the nourishment of the heavenly Word. Eager for this, Moses did not desire bread. Eager for this, Elijah did not feel the hunger of a long fast. For he who follows the Word cannot desire earthly bread when he receives the essence of the heavenly Bread. There is no doubt that the divine surpasses the human, as the spiritual the physical. Therefore he who desires true life awaits that Bread which through its intangible substance strengthens human hearts. At the same time, when he says, “Man lives not by bread alone,” he shows that the man is tempted, that is, his acceptance of our flesh, not his divinity.
John Chrysostom (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 407
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Hom. 13. in Matt.) But very wisely, He exceeded not their number of days, lest indeed He should be thought to have come in appearance only, and not to have really received the flesh, or lest the flesh should seem to be something beyond human nature.
Cyril of AlexandriaAD 444
COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 12
Satan said, “If you are the Son of God, bid this stone become bread.” He approaches him, therefore, as an ordinary man and as one of the saints, yet he had a suspicion that possibly he might be the Christ. How, then, did he hope to learn if this was the case? He reasoned that to change the nature of any thing into that which it was not would be the act and deed of a divine power. For it is God who makes these things and transforms them. “If he does this,” said the devil, “certainly it is he who is expected to subvert my power. But if he refuses to work this change, I am dealing with a man. I will set aside my fear. I am delivered from danger.” Therefore it was that Christ, knowing the monster’s plan, neither made the change nor said that he was either unable or unwilling to make it. Rather, the Lord shakes him off as annoying and meddlesome, saying, “Man shall not live by bread alone.” He means this: If God grants a man the ability, he can survive without eating and live as Moses and Elijah, who by the Word of the Lord passed forty days without taking food. If, therefore, it is possible to live without bread, why should I make the stone bread? He purposely does not say, “I cannot,” that he may not deny his own power. Nor does he say, “I can,” lest the devil, knowing that he is God, for whom alone such things are possible, should depart from him.: Observe, I beg you, how the nature of man in Christ casts off the faults of Adam’s gluttony. By eating we were conquered in Adam, by abstinence we conquered in Christ.
Gregory the DialogistAD 604
Forty Gospel Homilies, Homily 16
The ancient enemy raised himself against the first man, our parent, in three temptations, because he tempted him with gluttony, vainglory, and avarice; but by tempting he overcame him, because he subjected him to himself through consent. Indeed, he tempted him through gluttony when he showed him the food of the forbidden tree and persuaded him to eat.

But by the same means by which he overthrew the first man, by those same means he was overcome when he tempted the second man. For he tempts through gluttony when he says: "Command that this stone become bread."
Gregory the Dialogist (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 604
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(3. Mor. sup. Job 2.) Our enemy was however unable to shake the purpose of the Mediator between God and men. For He condescended to be tempted outwardly, yet so that His soul inwardly, resting in its divinity, remained unshaken.
Bede (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 735
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
That there might be no doubt by what Spirit He was led, while the other Evangelists say, into the wilderness, Luke has purposely added, And he was led by the Spirit into the wilderness for forty days. That no unclean spirit should be thought to have prevailed against Him, who being full of the Holy Spirit did whatever He wished.
BedeAD 735
On the Gospel of Luke
The devil said to him: If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become bread. The ancient enemy recognized that the redeemer of the human race had come into the world, his conqueror, and thus said through a possessed man: What have we to do with you, Son of God? Have you come here to torment us before the time? (Matt. VIII). However, when he first saw Him as vulnerable, observed Him able to endure mortal things due to His humanity, everything he suspected about His divinity came into doubt out of the pride of his arrogance. For nothing wise, except for the proud, doubted that He was God when he saw Him humble. Therefore, he turned to the means of temptations. But not like us who are pure humans, often shaken by attacking temptation, was the soul of our Redeemer troubled by the necessity of temptation. For our enemy, even if he was permitted to take Him to a high mountain, even if he proclaimed he would give Him the kingdoms of the world, even if he showed stones that could be turned into bread, still he could not shake the mind of the Mediator between God and men with temptation. For He graciously endured all these things outwardly, such that His mind inwardly, remaining attached to His divinity, remained unshaken. Even when it is said that He was troubled in spirit and groaned, He Himself divinely arranged how much He would be troubled humanly.
Theophylact of Ohrid (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1107
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
Christ is tempted after His baptism, showing us that after we are baptized, temptations await us. Hence it is said, But Jesus being full of the Holy Spirit, &c.

As if He said, Not by bread alone is human nature sustained, but the word of God is sufficient to support the whole nature of man. Such was the food of the Israelites when they gathered manna during the space of forty years, and when they delighted in the taking of quails. (Exod. 16:15, Numb. 11:32) By the Divine counsel Elias had the crows to entertain him; (1 Kings 17:6) Elisha fed his companions on the herbs of the field. (2 Kings 4:44.)
Ancient Greek Expositor (as quoted by Aquinas, AD 1274)AD 1274
Catena Aurea by Aquinas
(Severus.) But if we order our lives according to our own will, how was He led about unwillingly? Those words then, He was led by the Spirit, have some meaning of this kind: He led of His own accord that kind of life, that He might present an opportunity to the tempter.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Luke 4:3 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.