Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Gaal the son of Ebed said, Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? is not he the son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his officer? serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem: for why should we serve him?
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Gaal H1603 the son H1121 of Ebed H5651 said H559, Who is Abimelech H40, and who is Shechem H7927, that we should serve H5647 him? is not he the son H1121 of Jerubbaal H3378? and Zebul H2083 his officer H6496? serve H5647 the men H582 of Hamor H2544 the father H1 of Shechem H7927: for why should we serve H5647 him?
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Ga'al the son of a slave said, "Who is Avimelekh? Think of the contrast with Sh'khem! Why should we serve Avimelekh? Isn't he the son of Yeruba'al? Isn't Z'vul his officer? Serve the men of Hamor the father of Sh'khem! Why should we serve Avimelekh?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Then Gaal son of Ebed said, “Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? Is he not the son of Jerubbaal, and is not Zebul his officer? You are to serve the men of Hamor, the father of Shechem. Why should we serve Abimelech?
Ask
American Standard Version
And Gaal the son of Ebed said, Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? is not he the son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his officer? serve ye the men of Hamor the father of Shechem: but why should we serve him?
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Gaal the son of Ebed said, “Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? Isn’t he the son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his officer? Serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem: but why should we serve him?
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then Gaal the sonne of Ebed sayde, Who is Abimelech? and who is Shechem, that wee should serue him? Is he not the sonne of Ierubbaal? and Zebul is his officer? Serue rather the men of Hamor the father of Shechem: for why should we serue him?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And Gaal son of Ebed saith, `Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we serve him? is he not son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his commander? Serve ye the men of Hamor father of Shechem, and wherefore do we serve him--we?
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,783 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Judges 9:28 captures a pivotal moment of open defiance against Abimelech's illegitimate rule in Shechem, as Gaal, the son of Ebed, publicly challenges his authority. This verse dramatically highlights the simmering discontent among the Shechemites, questions Abimelech's right to govern by referencing his father Jerubbaal (Gideon), and strategically appeals to the city's ancient, pre-Israelite roots through Hamor. It sets the stage for the inevitable conflict, underscoring profound themes of power, identity, and the destructive consequences of rebellion against both human and divine order.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Judges 9:28 serves as the dramatic turning point in the narrative of Abimelech's tyrannical reign, marking the open rebellion that precipitates his downfall. The preceding verses establish the divine orchestration behind the unfolding chaos, detailing how God sent an "evil spirit" between Abimelech and the men of Shechem, causing them to deal treacherously with him, as recorded in Judges 9:23. This divine intervention creates the fertile ground for Gaal's opportune arrival and his subsequent incitement of the Shechemites. Abimelech had previously secured his power through a brutal massacre of his seventy half-brothers, a horrific act detailed in Judges 9:5. Jotham's prophetic fable of the trees, recounted in Judges 9:7-15, had already foretold a destructive "fire" that would consume both Abimelech and Shechem, a prophecy that begins its fiery fulfillment with Gaal's inflammatory challenge. Following this verse, the narrative rapidly escalates into direct military confrontation, as Zebul, Abimelech's officer, reports Gaal's rebellion, prompting Abimelech to launch a swift and devastating response against Shechem.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period of the Judges (approximately 1200-1000 BC) was characterized by a decentralized political structure in Israel, where "everyone did what was right in his own eyes," as famously stated in Judges 17:6. Shechem itself was a significant Canaanite city, strategically situated in the central highlands of Israel. It possessed a rich and complex history of interaction with the Israelites, dating back to Abraham's arrival in the land (Genesis 12:6) and Jacob's purchase of land there (Genesis 33:18-20). Furthermore, Shechem was the site of a crucial covenant renewal ceremony under Joshua, solidifying its importance in Israelite history (Joshua 24). Despite these Israelite connections, the Shechemites retained strong Canaanite cultural and religious elements, including the worship of Baal-berith, whose temple is mentioned in Judges 9:4. Gaal's appeal to "Hamor the father of Shechem" skillfully taps into this deep-seated Canaanite identity and ancient lineage, deliberately contrasting it with Abimelech's Israelite (via Gideon) yet illegitimate rule. This challenge reflects the volatile political landscape where power was often seized through force rather than established through legitimate succession or divine appointment.
  • Key Themes: Judges 9:28 powerfully contributes to several overarching themes present throughout Judges 9 and the broader book. It vividly illustrates the illegitimacy of self-appointed rule and the inherent instability of power seized through violence, standing in stark contrast to Gideon's humble refusal of kingship in Judges 8:23. The corrupting nature of unchecked ambition is glaringly evident in Abimelech's ruthless actions and Gaal's opportunistic rebellion. The narrative also explores the profound theme of divine judgment and retribution, as the "evil spirit" and the subsequent destructive conflict serve as the fulfillment of Jotham's curse, demonstrating God's justice against both Abimelech and the treacherous Shechemites, as prophesied in Judges 9:56-57. Furthermore, the verse underscores the fragility of human alliances and the potent power of rhetoric to incite rebellion, as Gaal's calculated words effectively mobilize the discontented populace. Finally, it delves into the complexities of civic identity and loyalty, as Gaal attempts to redirect Shechem's allegiance away from Abimelech and back towards its ancient, arguably more legitimate, Canaanite roots.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Gaal (Hebrew, Gaʻal', H1603): This name, meaning "loathing" or "abhorrence," is ironically prophetic given his role in inciting disgust and rebellion against Abimelech. Gaal is presented as an outsider, identified as "the son of Ebed" (meaning "servant" or "slave"), possibly indicating a humble, non-elite, or even foreign origin. Despite this, he rises to prominence by skillfully exploiting the existing political instability and disaffection within Shechem, embodying the opportunism and volatility characteristic of the period of the Judges.
  • Jerubbaal (Hebrew, Yᵉrubbaʻal', H3378): This name, meaning "Baal will contend" or "let Baal plead," was a symbolic name given to Gideon after he courageously destroyed the altar of Baal, as recorded in Judges 6:32. Gaal's deliberate use of this name when referring to Abimelech (who was Gideon's son) is a powerful rhetorical maneuver. It simultaneously reminds the Shechemites of Abimelech's lineage from a celebrated Israelite figure while subtly highlighting the profound irony that Gideon, the destroyer of Baal, sired a son who became a tyrannical ruler, perhaps even implying a connection to the Baal worship prevalent in Shechem. Crucially, it underscores Abimelech's lack of a legitimate, kingly claim, given that Gideon himself had explicitly refused the offer of kingship.
  • Hamor (Hebrew, Chămôwr', H2544): Meaning "donkey," Hamor was the Hivite prince and father of Shechem, a central figure in the foundational narrative of the city found in Genesis 34. Gaal's invocation of "the men of Hamor the father of Shechem" is a direct and potent appeal to the city's ancient, pre-Israelite, Canaanite heritage and identity. This rhetorical strategy suggests a desire to revert to a perceived purer or more legitimate form of governance rooted in their original lineage, creating a stark contrast with Abimelech's imposed, tyrannical rule. This appeal vividly highlights the complex and often conflicted identity of Shechem as a city with both deep Canaanite roots and significant, though sometimes strained, Israelite interactions.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Gaal the son of Ebed said, Who [is] Abimelech, and who [is] Shechem, that we should serve him?": This opening clause immediately establishes Gaal as the audacious instigator of rebellion. His rhetorical questions are meticulously crafted to undermine Abimelech's authority and legitimacy in the eyes of the Shechemites. By asking "Who is Abimelech?", Gaal challenges his right to rule, implying he is an insignificant figure or an illegitimate usurper. The subsequent "who [is] Shechem, that we should serve him?" is a provocative appeal to the Shechemites' civic pride and ancient identity, questioning why they, a prominent and historically significant city, should be subservient to an outsider or an illegitimate ruler. This is a direct and powerful incitement to reject Abimelech's dominion.
  • "[is] not [he] the son of Jerubbaal? and Zebul his officer?": Gaal continues his calculated rhetorical assault by reminding the Shechemites of Abimelech's lineage ("the son of Jerubbaal," i.e., Gideon). This seemingly innocuous statement is laden with profound irony and challenge. Gideon, a revered figure, had famously refused kingship, making Abimelech's self-appointed, tyrannical rule a stark and hypocritical contrast to his father's humility. By also mentioning "Zebul his officer," Gaal highlights Abimelech's reliance on his appointed administrator, perhaps suggesting that Abimelech himself is not truly present or fully in control, or that his rule is merely administrative rather than genuinely legitimate. This phrase further diminishes Abimelech's standing and authority, portraying him as a distant and ineffective leader.
  • "serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem: for why should we serve him?": This is Gaal's direct call to action and a clear proposal for an alternative allegiance. He urges the Shechemites to reject Abimelech and instead "serve the men of Hamor," appealing to their deep-rooted Canaanite heritage and the city's ancient, foundational identity. This is a potent appeal to tribal and civic loyalty, suggesting that their true allegiance should be to their ancestral lineage rather than to an oppressive, foreign-leaning ruler. The concluding rhetorical question, "for why should we serve him?", serves to reinforce the perceived absurdity and illegitimacy of their current subjugation to Abimelech, aiming to solidify their resolve for open rebellion and to justify their impending revolt.

Literary Devices

Judges 9:28 masterfully employs several literary devices to convey its message and propel the narrative forward. Rhetorical questions are central to Gaal's speech, with his repeated "Who is...?" and "Why should we...?" designed not to elicit information but to provoke thought, incite anger, and rally the Shechemites against Abimelech. This strategic use of questioning serves as a powerful tool of persuasion and incitement. The verse also utilizes profound irony, particularly in the reference to Abimelech as "the son of Jerubbaal." Gideon (Jerubbaal) was a deliverer who famously refused the crown, making his son's tyrannical usurpation and self-proclaimed kingship deeply ironic and highlighting the moral and spiritual decay within Israel. Allusion is powerfully present in the mention of "Hamor the father of Shechem," drawing upon the city's ancient origins in Genesis 34 to evoke a sense of historical identity and legitimate lineage, starkly contrasting it with Abimelech's recent, violent seizure of power. Finally, the entire verse functions as a catalyst, serving as the verbal spark that ignites the open rebellion and subsequent conflict, thereby fulfilling the earlier prophecies of divine judgment.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Judges 9:28 provides a stark and sobering illustration of the dire consequences of unchecked human ambition and the inherent dangers of rejecting God-ordained leadership in favor of self-serving power. Abimelech's illegitimate reign, built upon the blood of his own brothers, inevitably leads to internal strife, civic unrest, and ultimately, divine judgment. Gaal's challenge, though opportunistic and motivated by his own ambition, nonetheless exposes the fundamental instability of any kingdom founded upon violence, treachery, and human manipulation rather than upon righteousness and divine appointment. The Shechemites, by aligning themselves first with Abimelech and then with Gaal, demonstrate a fickle loyalty driven by self-interest and a lack of discernment, ultimately leading to their own catastrophic destruction. This narrative serves as a powerful reminder that true authority, lasting peace, and genuine societal flourishing derive from God's sovereign design and moral order, not from human manipulation, political maneuvering, or brute force.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The volatile events surrounding Gaal's challenge to Abimelech in Judges 9:28 offer profound and enduring lessons on the nature of leadership, the complexities of loyalty, and the destructive consequences of unbridled ambition. We are soberly reminded that power seized through violence, manipulation, and self-promotion, rather than earned through integrity, humble service, and divine appointment, is inherently unstable and ultimately self-destructive. Gaal's inflammatory rhetoric highlights the immense and often dangerous power of words to shape public opinion, incite rebellion, or, conversely, to foster unity and reconciliation – a sobering reminder of our own profound responsibility in how we use our voices and influence. For believers, this passage underscores the critical importance of discerning legitimate authority, not only in civil governance but also within spiritual leadership, and of consistently seeking peace and righteousness over personal gain, destructive conflict, or opportunistic rebellion. It challenges us to deeply consider whether our loyalties are rooted in transient human alliances and shifting political winds, or in the steadfast character and unchanging commands of God, who ultimately judges all actions, motives, and the very foundations upon which power is built.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Gaal's challenge vividly reflect the broader spiritual and political chaos that characterized the period of the Judges?
  • In what ways do we observe "illegitimate" authority or leadership being challenged in our contemporary contexts today, and what are the potential outcomes of such challenges?
  • What profound responsibility do we bear as individuals to speak truth to power, and what are the inherent dangers of inciting division or rebellion through our words and actions?
  • How does the Shechemites' shifting loyalty serve as a powerful warning against aligning ourselves with leaders or movements that operate outside of God's revealed principles and moral order?

FAQ

Why did Gaal challenge Abimelech's authority, and what was his motivation?

Answer: Gaal challenged Abimelech's authority primarily out of opportunism and personal ambition. The biblical text indicates that an "evil spirit" (sent by God as a judgment) had arisen between Abimelech and the men of Shechem, causing the Shechemites to deal treacherously with Abimelech, as described in Judges 9:23. Gaal, an outsider who had recently arrived in Shechem, recognized this simmering discontent and seized the moment to incite rebellion. His motivation was likely to usurp Abimelech's position and become the new ruler of Shechem himself. He skillfully appealed to the Shechemites' pride and their ancient Canaanite identity, contrasting it with Abimelech's perceived illegitimate rule and his Israelite lineage through Gideon (Jerubbaal).

What is the significance of Gaal's reference to "Hamor the father of Shechem"?

Answer: Gaal's reference to "Hamor the father of Shechem" is highly significant as it represents a strategic appeal to the city's deep historical and cultural identity. Hamor was the Hivite prince mentioned in the foundational narrative of Shechem in Genesis 34. By invoking Hamor, Gaal was reminding the Shechemites of their ancient, pre-Israelite heritage and subtly suggesting that their true allegiance should be to their ancestral roots and foundational identity rather than to Abimelech, whom he portrayed as an illegitimate, foreign-leaning oppressor. This was a powerful rhetorical move designed to rally the populace around a shared, deep-seated civic identity and to reject Abimelech's rule, which was seen as an imposition rather than a legitimate inheritance.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The chaotic and destructive narrative of Judges 9, culminating in Gaal's challenge and Abimelech's violent reign, stands in stark and profound contrast to the perfect, legitimate, and redemptive kingship of Jesus Christ. Abimelech, a self-appointed king who seized power through murder and deceit, represents the epitome of fallen human ambition and illegitimate authority, leading only to widespread destruction, internal strife, and divine judgment. His rule serves as a tragic reminder of Israel's deep longing for a true king, yet their repeated inability to produce one who genuinely embodied God's justice, righteousness, and providential care. In glorious contrast, Jesus is the King appointed by God the Father Himself, whose authority is not seized through violence but divinely given and exercised in perfect righteousness, humble service, and unconditional love, as affirmed in Matthew 28:18. Unlike Abimelech, who brought fire and utter destruction upon his own people, Christ is the true "Son of David," the promised Messiah who brings not judgment but profound peace, reconciliation, and eternal life, offering His own life as the ultimate sacrifice to atone for the sins of the world (Isaiah 9:6-7). While Gaal incited rebellion against an earthly tyrant, Jesus calls for a radical and transformative allegiance to a heavenly kingdom, inviting all who are weary and burdened to submit to His gentle and humble rule, where true freedom, rest for the soul, and eternal life are found (Matthew 11:28-30). The story of Abimelech and Shechem, with its cycles of violence and unfulfilled longing, powerfully foreshadows humanity's desperate need for a perfect King, a need ultimately and gloriously fulfilled in Christ, who establishes His kingdom not through human violence or political maneuvering, but through sacrificial love, the power of resurrection, and His ultimate exaltation (Philippians 2:8-11).

Copy as

Commentary on Judges 9 verses 22–49

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Three years Abimelech reigned, after a sort, without any disturbance; it is not said, He judged Israel, or did any service at all to his country, but so long he enjoyed the title and dignity of a king; and not only the Shechemites, but many other places, paid him respect. They must have been fond of a king that could please themselves with such a one as this. But the triumphing of the wicked is short. Within three years, as the years of a hireling, all this glory shall be contemned, and laid in the dust, Isa 16:14. The ruin of these confederates in wickedness was from the righteous hand of the God to whom vengeance belongs. He sent an evil spirit between Abimelech and the Shechemites (Jdg 9:23), that is, they grew jealous one of another and ill-affected one to another. He slighted those that set him up, and perhaps countenanced other cities which now began to come into his interests more than he did theirs; and then they grew uneasy at his government, blamed his conduct, and quarrelled at his impositions. This was from God. He permitted the devil, that great mischief-maker, to sow discord between them, and he is an evil spirit, whom God not only keeps under his check, but sometimes serves his own purposes by. Their own lusts were evil spirits; they are devils in men's own hearts; from them come wars and fightings. These God gave them up to, and so might be said to send the evil spirits between them. When men's sin is made their punishment, though God is not the author of the sin, yet the punishment is from him. The quarrel God had with Abimelech and the Shechemites was for the murder of the sons of Gideon (Jdg 9:24): That the cruelty done to them might come and their blood be laid as a burden upon Abimelech that slew them, and the men of Shechem that helped him. Note, 1. Sooner or later God will make inquisition for blood, innocent blood, and will return it on the heads of those that shed it, who shall have blood given them to drink, for they are worthy. 2. Accessaries shall be reckoned with, as well as principals, in that and other sins. The Shechemites that countenanced Abimelech's pretensions, aided and abetted him in his bloody project, and avowed the fact by making him king after he had done it, must fall with him, fall by him, and fall first. 3. Those that combine together to do wickedly are justly dashed in pieces one against another. Blood cannot be a lasting cement to any interest.

I. The Shechemites began to affront Abimelech, perhaps they scarcely knew why or wherefore, but they were given to change. 1. They dealt treacherously with him, Jdg 9:23. It is not said, They repented of their sin in owning him. Had they done so, it would have been laudable to disown him; but they did it only upon some particular pique conceived against him by their pride or envy. Those that set him up were the first that deserted him and endeavoured to dethrone him. It is not strange that those who were ungrateful to Gideon were unfaithful to Abimelech; for what will hold those that will not be held by the obligation of such merits as Gideon's? Note, It is just with God that those who tempt others to be cone perfidious should afterwards be themselves betrayed by those whom they have taught to be perfidious. 2. They aimed to seize him when he was at Arumah (Jdg 9:41), his country-seat. Expecting him to come to town, they set liers in wait for him (Jdg 9:25), who should make him their prisoner whom they had lately made their prince. Those who were thus posted, he not coming, took the opportunity of robbing travellers, which would help to make the people more and more uneasy under Abimelech, when they saw he could not or would not protect them from highway-men. 3. They entertained one Gaal, and set him up as their head in opposition to Abimelech, Jdg 9:26. This Gaal is said to be the son of Ebed, which signifies a servant, perhaps denoting the meanness of his extraction. As Abimelech was by the mother's side, so he by the father's, the son of a servant. Here was one bramble contesting with another. We have reason to suspect that this Gaal was a native Canaanite, because he courts the Shechemites into subjection to the men of Hamor, who was the ancient lord of this city in Jacob's time. He was a bold ambitious man, served their purpose admirably well when they were disposed to quarrel with Abimelech, and they also served his purpose; so he went over to them to blow the coals, and they put their confidence in him. 4. They did all the despite they could to Abimelech's name, Jdg 9:27. They made themselves very merry in his absence, as those who were glad he was out of the way, and who, now that they had another to head them, were in hopes to get clear of him; nay, they went into the house of their god, to solemnize their feast of in-gathering, and there they did eat, and drink, and cursed Abimelech, not only said all the ill they could of him in their table-talk and the song of their drunkards, but wished all the ill they could to him over their sacrifices, praying to their idol to destroy him. They drank healths to his confusion, and with as loud huzzas as ever they had drunk them to his prosperity. That very temple whence they had fetched money to set him up with did they now meet in to curse him and contrive his ruin. Had they deserted their idol-god with their image-king, they might have hoped to prosper; but, while they still cleave to the former, the latter shall cleave to them to their ruin. How should Satan cast out Satan? 5. They pleased themselves with Gaal's vaunted defiance of Abimelech, Jdg 9:28, Jdg 9:29. They loved to hear that impudent upstart speak scornfully, (1.) Of Abimelech, though calling him in disdain Shechem, or a Shechemite, he reflected upon their own city. (2.) Of his good father likewise, Gideon: Is not he the son of Jerubbaal? So he calls him, perhaps in an impious indignation at his name and memory for throwing down the altar of Baal, turning that to his reproach which was his praise. (3.) Of his prime minister of state, Zebul his officer, and ruler of the city. "We may well be ashamed to serve them, and need not be afraid to oppose them." Men of turbulent ambitious spirits thus despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. Gaal aimed not to recover Shechem's liberty, only to change their tyrant: "O that this people were under my hand! What I would do! I would challenge Abimelech to try titles for the crown;" and it should seem he desired his friends to send him word that he was ready to dispute it with him whenever he pleased: "Increase thy army, and come out. Do thy worst; let the point be determined by the sword." This pleased the Shechemites, who were now as sick of Abimelech as ever they had been fond of him. Men of no conscience will be men of no constancy.

II. Abimelech turned all his force upon them, and, in a little time, quite ruined them. Observe the steps of their overthrow.

1.The Shechemites' counsels were betrayed to Abimelech by Zebul his confidant, the ruler of the city, who continued hearty for him. His anger was kindled (Jdg 9:30), and the more because Gaal had spoken slightly of him (Jdg 9:28), for perhaps, if he had complimented and caressed him now that things were in this ferment, he might have gained him to his interest; but he, being disobliged, sends notice to Abimelech of all that was said and done in Shechem against him, Jdg 9:31. Betrayers are often betrayed by some among themselves, and the cursing of the king is sometimes strangely carried by a bird of the air. He prudently advises him to come against the city immediately, and lose no time, Jdg 9:32, Jdg 9:33. He thinks it best that he should march his forces by night into the neighbourhood, surprise the city in the morning, and then make the best of his advantages. How could the Shechemites hope to speed in their attempt when the ruler of their city was in the interests of their enemy? They knew it, and yet took no care to secure him.

2.Gaal, that headed their faction, having been betrayed by Zebul, Abimelech's confidant, was most wretchedly bantered by him. Abimelech, according to Zebul's advice, drew all his forces down upon Shechem by night, Jdg 9:34. Gaal, in the morning, went out to the gate (Jdg 9:35) to see what posture things were in, and to enquire, What news? Zebul, as a ruler of the city, met him there as a friend. Abimelech and his forces beginning to move towards the city, Gaal discovers them (Jdg 9:36), takes notice of their approach to Zebul that was standing with him, little thinking that he had sent for them and was now expecting them. "Look," says he, "do not I see a body of men coming down from the mountain towards us? Yonder they are," pointing to the place. "No, no," says Zebul; "thy eye-sight deceives thee; it is but the shadow of the mountains which thou takest to be an army." By this he intended, (1.) To ridicule him, as a man of no sense or spirit, and therefore very unfit for what he pretended to, as a man that might easily be imposed upon and made to believe any thing, and that was so silly and so cowardly that he apprehended danger where there was none, and was ready to fight with a shadow. (2.) To detain him, and hold him in talk, while the forces of Abimelech were coming up, that thereby they might gain advantage. But when Gaal, being content to believe those he now saw to be but the shadow of the mountains (perhaps the mountains of Ebal and Gerizim, which lay close by the city), was undeceived by the discovery of two other companies that marched apace towards the city, then Zebul took another way to banter him, upbraiding him with what he had said but a day or two before, in contempt of Abimelech (Jdg 9:38): Where is now thy mouth, that foul mouth of thine, wherewith thou saidst, Who is Abimelech? Note, Proud and haughty people are often made in a little time to change their note, and to dread those whom they had most despised. Gaal had, in a bravado, challenged Abimelech to increase his army and come out; but now Zebul, in Abimelech's name, challenges him: Go out, and fight with them, if thou darest. Justly are the insolent thus insulted over.

3.Abimelech routed Gaal's forces that sallied out of the town, Jdg 9:39, Jdg 9:40. Gaal, disheartened no doubt by Zebul's hectoring him, and perceiving his interest weaker than he thought it was, though he marched out against Abimelech with what little force he had, was soon put to the worst, and obliged to retire into the city with great precipitation. In this action the Shechemites' loss was considerable: Many were overthrown and wounded, the common effect of popular tumults, in which the inconsiderate multitude are often drawn into fatal snare by those that promise them glorious success.

4.Zebul that night expelled Gaal, and the party he had brought with him into Shechem, out of the city (Jdg 9:41), sending him to the place whence he came. For though the generality of the city continued still averse to Abimelech, as appears by the sequel of the story, yet they were willing to part with Gaal, and did not oppose his expulsion, because, though he had talked big, both his skill and courage had failed him when there was occasion for them. Most people judge of men's fitness for business by their success, and he that does not speed well is concluded not to do well. Well, Gaal's interest in Shechem is soon at an end, and he that had talked of removing Abimelech is himself removed, nor do we ever hear of him any more. Exit Gaal - Gaal retires.

5.Abimelech, the next day, set upon the city, and quite destroyed it, for their treacherous dealings with him. Perhaps Abimelech had notice of their expelling Gaal, who had headed the faction, with which they thought he would have been satisfied, but the crime was too keep to be thus atoned for, and his resentments were too keen to be pacified by so small an instance of submission, besides that it was more Zebul's act than theirs; by it their hands were weakened, and therefore he resolved to follow his blow, and effectually to chastise their treachery. (1.) He had intelligence brought him that the people of Shechem had come out into the field, Jdg 9:42. Some think into the field of business to plough and sow (having lately gathered in their harvest), or to perfect their harvest, for it was only their vintage that they had made an end of (Jdg 9:27), and then it intimates that they were secure. And because Abimelech had retired (Jdg 9:41) they thought themselves in no danger from him, and then the issue of it is an instance of sudden destruction coming upon those that cry, Peace and safety. Others think they went out into the field of battle; though Gaal was driven out, they would not lay down their arms, but put themselves into a posture for another engagement with Abimelech, in which they hoped to retrieve what they had lost the day before, (2.) He himself, with a strong detachment, cut off the communication between them and the city, stood in the entering of the gate (Jdg 9:44), that they might neither make their retreat into the city nor receive any succours from the city, and then sent two companies of his men, who were too strong for them, and they put them all to the sword, ran upon those that were in the fields and slew them. When we go out about our business we are not sure that we shall come home again; there are deaths both in the city and in the field. (3.) He then fell upon the city itself, and, with a rage reaching up to heaven, though it was the place of his nativity, laid it in ruins, slew all the people, beat down all the buildings, and, in token of his desire that it might be a perpetual desolation, sowed it with salt, that it might remain a lasting monument of the punishment of perfidiousness. Yet Abimelech prevailed not to make its desolations perpetual; for it was afterwards rebuilt, and became so considerable a place that all Israel came thither to make Rehoboam king, Kg1 12:1. And the place proved an ill omen. Abimelech intended hereby to punish the Shechemites for their serving him formerly in the murder of Gideon's sons. Thus, when God makes use of men as instruments in his hand to do his work, he means one thing and they another, Isa 10:6, Isa 10:7. They design to maintain their honour, but God to maintain his.

6.Those that retired into a strong-hold of their idol-temple were all destroyed there. These are called the men of the tower of Shechem (Jdg 9:46, Jdg 9:47), some castle that belonged to the city, but lay at some distance from it. They, hearing of the destruction of the city, withdrew into a hold of the temple, trusting, it is likely, not so much to its strength as to its sanctity; they put themselves under the protection of their idol: for thus all people will walk in the name of their god, and shall not we then choose to dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of our life? For in the time of trouble he shall hide us in his pavilion, Psa 27:5. The name of the Lord is a strong tower, Pro 18:10. But that which they hoped would be for their welfare proved to them a snare and a trap, as those will certainly find that run to idols for shelter; it will prove a refuge of lies. When Abimelech had them altogether penned up in that hold he desired no more. That barbarous project immediately came into his head of setting fire to the strong-hold, and, so to speak, burning all the birds together in the nest. He kept the design to himself, but set all his men on work to expedite the execution of it, Jdg 9:48, Jdg 9:49. He ordered them all to follow him, and do as he did: as his father had said to his men (Jdg 7:17), Look on me, and do likewise; so saith he to his, as becomes a general that will not be wanting to give both the plainest direction and the highest encouragement that can be to his soldiers: What you have seen me do make haste to do, as I have done. Not Ite illuc - Go thither; but Venite huc - Come hither. The officers in Christ's army should thus teach by their example, Phi 4:9. He and they fetched each of them a bough from a wood not far off, laid all their boughs together under the wall of this tower, which it is probable was of wood, set fire to their boughs, and so burnt down their hold and all that were in it, who were either burnt or stifled with the smoke. What inventions men have to destroy one another! Whence come these cruel wars and fightings but from their lusts? Some think that the men of the tower of Shechem were the same with the house of Millo, and then Jotham's just imprecation was answered in the letter: Let fire come out from Abimelech, and devour not only in general the men of Shechem, but in particular the house of Millo, Jdg 9:20. About 1000 men and women perished in these flames, many of whom, it is probable, were no way concerned in the quarrel between Abimelech and the Shechemites, nor meddled with either side, yet, in this civil war, they came to this miserable end; for men of factious turbulent spirits perish not alone in their iniquity, but involve many more, that follow them in their simplicity, in the same calamity with them.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 22–49. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Judges 9:28 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.