TRV
Translation
King James Version
And Micah said unto him, Whence comest thou? And he said unto him, I am a Levite of Bethlehemjudah, and I go to sojourn where I may find a place.
Complete Jewish Bible
Mikhah asked him, "Where are you coming from?" He answered, "I am a Levi from Beit-Lechem in Y'hudah, and I'm looking for a place to live."
Berean Standard Bible
“Where are you from?” Micah asked him. “I am a Levite from Bethlehem in Judah,” he replied, “and I am on my way to settle wherever I can find a place.”
American Standard Version
And Micah said unto him, Whence comest thou? And he said unto him, I am a Levite of Beth-lehem-judah, and I go to sojourn where I may find a place.
World English Bible Messianic
Micah said to him, “Where did you come from?” He said to him, “I am a Levite of Bethlehem Judah, and I am looking for a place to live.”
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Michah saide vnto him, Whence comest thou? And the Leuite answered him, I come from Beth-lehem Iudah, and goe to dwell where I may finde a place.
Young's Literal Translation
And Micah saith to him, `Whence comest thou?' and he saith unto him, `A Levite am I, of Beth-Lehem-Judah, and I am going to sojourn where I do find.'
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,990 of 31,102
Study This Verse
Commentary on Judges 17 verses 7–13
7 ¶ And there was a young man out of Bethlehemjudah of the family of Judah, who was a Levite, and he sojourned there.
8 And the man departed out of the city from Bethlehemjudah to sojourn where he could find a place: and he came to mount Ephraim to the house of Micah, as he journeyed.
9 And Micah said unto him, Whence comest thou? And he said unto him, I am a Levite of Bethlehemjudah, and I go to sojourn where I may find a place.
10 And Micah said unto him, Dwell with me, and be unto me a father and a priest, and I will give thee ten shekels of silver by the year, and a suit of apparel, and thy victuals. So the Levite went in.
11 And the Levite was content to dwell with the man; and the young man was unto him as one of his sons.
12 And Micah consecrated the Levite; and the young man became his priest, and was in the house of Micah.
13 Then said Micah, Now know I that the LORD will do me good, seeing I have a Levite to my priest.
We have here an account of Micah's furnishing himself with a Levite for his chaplain, either thinking his son, because the heir of his estate, too good to officiate, or rather, because not of God's tribe, not good enough. Observe,
I. What brought this Levite to Micah. By his mother's side he was of the family of Judah, and lived at Bethlehem among his mother's relations (for that was not a Levites' city), or, upon some other account, as a stranger or inmate, sojourned there, Jdg 17:7. Thence he went to sojourn where he could find a place, and in his travels came to the house of Micah in Mount Ephraim, Jdg 17:8. Now, 1. Some think it was his unhappiness that he was under a necessity of removing, either because he was persecuted and abused, or rather neglected and starved, at Bethlehem. God had made plentiful provision for the Levites, but the people withheld their dues, and did not help them into the possession of the cities assigned to them; so that they were reduced to straits, and no care was taken for their relief. Israel's forsaking God began with forsaking the Levites, which therefore they are warned against, Deu 12:19. It is a sign religion is going to decay when good ministers are neglected and at a loss for a livelihood. But, 2. It seems rather to have been his fault and folly, that he loved to wander, threw himself out where he was, and forfeited the respect of his friends, and, having a roving head, would go to seek his fortune, as we say. We cannot conceive that things had yet come to such a pass among them that a Levite should be poor, unless it was his own fault. As those are fit to be pitied that would fix but may not, so those are fit to be punished that might fix but will not. Unsettledness being, one would think, a constant uneasiness, it is strange that any Israelite, especially any Levite, should affect it.
II. What bargain Micah made with him. Had he not been well enough content with his son for his priest, he would have gone or sent abroad to enquire out a Levite, but now he only takes hold of one that drops into his hands, which showed that he had no great zeal in the matter. It is probable that this rambling Levite had heard, in the country, of Micah's house of gods, his graven and molten image, which, if he had had any thing of the spirit of a Levite in him, would have brought him thither to reprove Micah for his idolatry, to tell how directly contrary it was to the law of God, and how it would bring the judgments of God upon him; but instead of this, like a base and degenerate branch of that sacred tribe, thither he goes to offer his service, with, Have you any work for a Levite? for I am out of business, and go to sojourn where I may find a place; all he aimed at was to get bread, not to do good, Jdg 17:9. Micah courts him into his family (v. 10), and promises him, 1. Good preferment: Be unto me a father and a priest. Though a young man, and taken up at the door, yet, if he take him for a priest, he will respect him as a father, so far is he from setting him among his servants. He asks not for his credentials, takes no time to enquire how he behaved in the place of his last settlement, considers not whether, though he was a Levite, yet he might not be of such a bad character as to be a plague and scandal to his family, but thinks, though he should be ever so great a rake, he might serve for a priest to a graven image, like Jeroboam's priest of the lowest of the people, Kg1 12:31. No marvel if those who can make any thing serve for a god can also make any thing serve for a priest. 2. A tolerable maintenance. He will allow him meat, and drink, and clothes, a double suit, so the word is in the margin, a better and a worse, one for every day's wear and one for holy days, and ten shekels, about twenty-five shillings, a year for spending money - a poor salary in comparison of what God provided for the Levites that behaved well; but those that forsake God's service will never better themselves, nor find a better master. The ministry is the best calling but the worst trade in the world.
III. The Levite's settlement with him (Jdg 17:11): He was content to dwell with the man; though his work was superstitious and his wages were scandalous, he objected against neither, but thought himself happy that he had lighted on so good a house. Micah, thinking himself holier than any of his neighbours, presumed to consecrate this Levite, v. 12. As if his building, furnishing, and endowing this chapel authorized him, not only to appoint the person that should officiate there, but to confer those orders upon him which he had no right to give nor the other to receive. And now he shows him respect as a father and tenderness as a son, and is willing thus to make up the deficiency of the coin he gave him.
IV. Micah's satisfaction in this (Jdg 17:13): Now know I that the Lord will do me good (that is, he hoped that his new establishment would gain reputation among his neighbours, which would turn to his advantage, for he would share in the profit of his altar; or, rather, he hoped that God would countenance and bless him in all he put his hand unto) because I have a Levite to be my priest. 1. He thought it was a sign of God's favour to him and his images that he had so opportunely sent a Levite to his door. Thus those who please themselves with their own delusions, if Providence unexpectedly bring any thing to their hands that furthers them in their evil way, are too apt to infer thence that God is pleased with them. 2. He thought now that the error of his priesthood was amended all was well, though he still retained his graven and molten image. Note, Many deceive themselves into a good opinion of their state by a partial reformation. They think they are as good as they should be, because, in some one particular instance, they are not so bad as they have been, as if the correcting of one fault would atone for their persisting in all the rest. 3. He thought the making of a Levite into a priest was a very meritorious act, which really was a presumptuous usurpation, and every provoking to God. Men's pride, and ignorance, and self-flattery, will undertake, not only to justify, but magnify and sanctify, the most daring impieties and invasions upon the divine prerogatives. With much reason might Micah have said, "Now may I fear that God will curse me, because I have debauched one of his own tribe, and drawn him into the worship of a graven image;" yet for this he hopes God will do him good. 4. He thought that having a Levite in the house with him would of course entitle him to the divine favour. Carnal hearts are apt to build too much upon their external privileges, and to conclude that God will certainly do them good because they are born of godly parents, dwell in praying families, are linked in society with those that are very good, and sit under a lively ministry; whereas all this is but like having a Levite to be their priest, which amounts to no security at all that God will do them good, unless they be good themselves, and make a good use of these advantages.
Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 7–13. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as
Continue studying Judges 17:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Judges 17:9 records the pivotal encounter between Micah, a man who has established a private, unauthorized shrine, and a young, wandering Levite from Bethlehem-Judah. This brief exchange vividly exposes the profound spiritual and societal disarray that characterized the period of the Judges, revealing a widespread abandonment of divinely ordained structures and a pervasive pursuit of self-interest over covenant faithfulness, even among those consecrated for sacred service.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The verse employs several significant literary devices to underscore its theological message. Irony is profoundly present, as a Levite, a member of the tribe divinely set apart for sacred service and upholding God's law, is found wandering and seeking employment, a stark contrast to his intended role. This highlights the deep spiritual decay of the Judges period. Symbolism is also powerfully at play, with the wandering Levite symbolizing the spiritual homelessness and moral adriftness of the entire nation, where "every man did that which was right in his own eyes." The mention of Bethlehem-Judah serves as a subtle yet potent foreshadowing and contrast. While it is the origin of a compromised figure in a time of darkness, it is also the future birthplace of King David and, more significantly, the Messiah, creating a poignant backdrop of future hope against the present despair. The Levite's declaration of his aim to "sojourn where I may find a place" evokes a sense of pathos, drawing pity for his plight, even as his subsequent actions reveal his moral compromise and the systemic failure that enabled it.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Judges 17:9 serves as a stark theological commentary on the dire consequences of covenant unfaithfulness and the breakdown of divinely ordained structures. It illustrates how the absence of a central, righteous authority—the repeated refrain of "no king in Israel"—leads directly to spiritual anarchy, where even those entrusted with sacred duties become compromised and driven by self-interest rather than divine calling. The Levite's wandering reflects not only his personal predicament but the broader spiritual homelessness of a nation that had forsaken its God and its covenant obligations. This narrative underscores the profound need for faithful leadership and a people committed to upholding God's law, demonstrating that when the spiritual foundations crumble, society descends into chaos and corruption, making individuals vulnerable to false worship and idolatry.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Judges 17:9 offers a sobering mirror for contemporary believers, challenging us to examine the state of our own spiritual lives and communities. The wandering Levite, driven by the need to "find a place," serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers of spiritual drift and prioritizing personal gain or comfort over one's divine calling. Are we, as individuals and as the corporate body of Christ, truly rooted in God's truth and community, or are we susceptible to wandering and compromising our convictions for convenience or provision? This verse compels us to consider the integrity of our service to God, ensuring that our motives are pure and our actions align with His established principles, rather than succumbing to the temptation to "do what is right in our own eyes." Furthermore, it highlights the critical importance of a faithful, supportive spiritual community that upholds and provides for those in leadership, preventing them from being forced into compromising positions. It calls us to uphold the dignity and sacredness of ministry, ensuring that those called to serve are not compelled to abandon their posts for lack of support, and that they themselves remain committed to their high calling above all else, resisting the allure of self-serving compromise.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why was a Levite wandering and looking for a place to "sojourn" instead of serving in a designated Levitical city?
Answer: The Levite's wandering underscores the profound breakdown of the Mosaic covenant and the societal order during the period of the Judges. According to God's law, the Levites were not allotted tribal land but were to be supported by the tithes and offerings of the other tribes and were assigned specific cities throughout Israel to live in, as detailed in Numbers 35:1-8. Their divinely appointed role was to serve at the central sanctuary (the Tabernacle at this time), teach the Law, and administer justice. However, Judges 17:9 illustrates that the Israelites were failing in their covenant obligations to support the Levites, forcing them to become itinerants, seeking sustenance and lodging wherever they could find it. This reflects a broader spiritual and moral decay where "there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes," as stated in Judges 17:6, leading to widespread neglect of divine commands and the subsequent compromise of even those set apart for sacred service.
What was wrong with Micah hiring this Levite as his personal priest?
Answer: Micah's hiring of the Levite was fundamentally wrong on several counts, violating core tenets of the Mosaic Law and the divinely established order of worship. Firstly, the priesthood was exclusively reserved for the descendants of Aaron, a specific family within the tribe of Levi, as commanded in Exodus 28:1. While this individual was a Levite, it is not stated that he was an Aaronic priest, making his priestly service illegitimate. More importantly, the Law mandated a single central sanctuary for worship and sacrifice, initially the Tabernacle, as emphasized in Deuteronomy 12:5-7. Micah's establishment of a private shrine with idols, even if staffed by a Levite, was a direct violation of this command, promoting decentralized, unauthorized, and idolatrous worship. Micah's belief that having a Levite would bring him prosperity, as seen in Judges 17:13, reveals a superstitious, self-serving approach to religion, rather than true obedience to God's revealed will. The Levite, by accepting the position for personal gain, also compromised his sacred calling, becoming a mercenary rather than a faithful servant of the Lord.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Judges 17:9, with its poignant depiction of a wandering Levite and a nation adrift in spiritual anarchy, powerfully underscores the desperate need for a true and faithful High Priest and King, ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The Levite, a figure meant to mediate between God and His people and uphold the Law, is shown as compromised and seeking personal gain, symbolizing the inherent limitations and ultimate failure of the Old Covenant priesthood to fully address humanity's spiritual brokenness. This chaotic era, characterized by the refrain that "every man did that which was right in his own eyes," found in Judges 21:25, highlights the profound absence of a righteous King to guide and govern His people according to God's perfect will. Jesus, however, is the perfect High Priest, not of the Aaronic order, but "according to the order of Melchizedek," as declared in Hebrews 7:17, who offered Himself as the ultimate, once-for-all sacrifice for sin, as affirmed in Hebrews 9:28. He is also the promised King, born in Bethlehem-Judah, the very town mentioned in Judges 17:9, thereby fulfilling the ancient prophecy of Micah 5:2. Unlike the wandering Levite, Christ was fully committed to His divine calling, seeking not His own gain but the perfect will of His Father, as He stated in John 6:38. He is the true "place" where humanity finds ultimate rest, spiritual provision, and reconciliation with God, bringing divine order to the spiritual anarchy and establishing a kingdom that is "not of this world," as He told Pilate in John 18:36, yet transforms it from within.