Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Cabbon, and Lahmam, and Kithlish,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Cabbon H3522, and Lahmam H3903, and Kithlish H3798,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Kabon, Lachmas, Kitlish,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Cabbon, Lahmas, Chitlish,
Ask
American Standard Version
and Cabbon, and Lahmam, and Chitlish,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Cabbon, Lahmam, Chitlish,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Cabbon, and Lahmam, and Kithlish,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Cabbon, and Lahmam, and Kithlish,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,243 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 15:40, by listing the towns of Cabbon, Lahmam, and Kithlish, provides a seemingly simple but profoundly significant detail within the extensive enumeration of Judah's inheritance. This verse serves as a meticulous record of God's unwavering faithfulness, demonstrating the tangible fulfillment of His ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants regarding the precise boundaries and complete possession of the Promised Land, thereby establishing Israel's identity and divine order within their allotted territory.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Joshua 15:40 is embedded within the longest and most detailed chapter dedicated to a single tribe's inheritance, meticulously outlining the boundaries and cities allotted to Judah. Chapters Joshua 13-19 collectively describe the division of Canaan among the tribes, following the successful military campaigns detailed in earlier chapters, such as the conquest of the south in Joshua 10 and the north in Joshua 11. The sheer volume of place names, often grouped into districts, underscores the administrative precision and legal weight of this divine land distribution. These lists are not mere geographical appendices but serve as a comprehensive legal deed, validating Israel's claim to the land and confirming the fulfillment of God's covenant promises, reinforcing the historical reality and theological significance of their settled existence.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The division of the land marked a pivotal transition for Israel from a nomadic, conquering force to a settled nation. In ancient Near Eastern societies, land ownership was the bedrock of identity, economic stability, and social structure. For Israel, it was also inextricably linked to their covenant relationship with Yahweh. The process of land distribution, often determined by lot as instructed in Numbers 26:55, underscored God's sovereign hand in the allocation, ensuring that each tribe received its portion directly from Him. The specific naming of towns like Cabbon, Lahmam, and Kithlish was crucial for practical administration, including taxation, military conscription, and establishing clear tribal boundaries to prevent future disputes. This meticulous record keeping was vital for the nascent Israelite confederacy, solidifying their presence and establishing order in their divinely appointed homeland.
  • Key Themes: The meticulous cataloging of cities in Joshua 15, including the three in verse 40, powerfully illustrates several foundational themes. Firstly, it highlights Divine Faithfulness, showcasing God's unwavering commitment to fulfilling His ancient covenant promises, first made to Abraham in Genesis 15:18 and reiterated to Moses, to grant the land of Canaan to Israel as an eternal possession. Secondly, it emphasizes Order and Administration, revealing God as a God of precision and systematic arrangement, ensuring the land was divided equitably and without chaos among the twelve tribes, as meticulously documented throughout Joshua 13-19. Finally, these detailed lists underscore the theme of Inheritance and Possession, demonstrating the tangible manifestation of Israel's identity and future prosperity, rooted in the physical land. This physical inheritance served as a constant, tangible reminder of God's provision and their unique status as His chosen people, possessing the land He had promised.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Cabbon (Hebrew, Kabbôwn, H3522): From an unused root meaning "to heap up," this name is understood to mean "hilly." Its inclusion in the list suggests a place characterized by its topography, likely situated in a region with significant elevation or mounds. As with other place names in these lists, its primary function is to identify a specific, tangible location within Judah's inheritance, confirming the precise fulfillment of God's promise.
  • Lahmam (Hebrew, Lachmâç, H3903): Probably a transcription error for Laḥmām, this name is derived from the Hebrew word for "bread" (leḥem), thus meaning "food-like." This etymology might suggest a fertile area or a place known for its agricultural productivity, providing sustenance. Its presence signifies another distinct settlement, contributing to the comprehensive and detailed record of Judah's allotted territory.
  • Kithlish (Hebrew, Kithlîysh, H3798): Derived from Hebrew words meaning "wall" (kōtel) and "man" (ʾîsh), this name translates to "wall of a man." This could imply a fortified settlement, a place with a significant defensive structure, or perhaps a place named after a prominent individual. Its inclusion, alongside Cabbon and Lahmam, further emphasizes the meticulous detail of the biblical record in documenting every part of Judah's physical and covenantal inheritance.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Cabbon": This phrase introduces the first of three towns enumerated in this specific verse. The conjunction "And" (the Hebrew waw) serves to link this name seamlessly to the preceding list of cities in Joshua 15, indicating its continuous inclusion within the larger inventory of Judah's inherited territories. It marks a distinct, identifiable location within the tribal allotment.
  • "and Lahmam": The addition of "and Lahmam" continues the precise cataloging of towns. The repetitive use of the conjunction emphasizes the exhaustive nature of the inventory, demonstrating the meticulous detail with which the tribal inheritances were recorded. Each name represents a distinct, tangible piece of the promised land, underscoring the reality of the possession.
  • "and Kithlish": The final town named in this verse, "and Kithlish," completes this particular triplet of settlements. Its inclusion further reinforces the precision and thoroughness of the biblical record concerning the land division. Together, these names are not abstract concepts but represent concrete geographical locations that formed an integral part of Judah's physical and covenantal inheritance, validating God's faithfulness.

Literary Devices

Joshua 15:40, like the broader chapter, primarily employs Enumeration and Topography. The detailed listing of place names is a form of enumeration, providing a comprehensive inventory of the cities assigned to Judah. This meticulous cataloging serves a crucial legal and administrative function, solidifying the boundaries and possessions of the tribe. The specific naming of towns like Cabbon, Lahmam, and Kithlish contributes to the Topography of the text, grounding the narrative in real-world geography and emphasizing the tangible fulfillment of God's promises. The consistent use of the conjunction "and" before each name is a subtle form of Repetition, which reinforces the exhaustive nature of the list and the systematic process of land allocation. These devices collectively underscore the historical accuracy, legal precision, and divine faithfulness inherent in the division of the Promised Land.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Even in what appears to be a dry list of ancient place names, Joshua 15:40 speaks volumes about God's character and His relationship with His people. The meticulous detail in enumerating every town and boundary line reveals a God who is not vague or forgetful but precise, orderly, and utterly faithful to His word. This level of specificity demonstrates that God's promises are not abstract concepts but tangible realities, fulfilled down to the last detail. For the Israelites, these names represented their identity, security, and the enduring legacy of God's covenant. It teaches us that God cares about the specifics of His plans and His people's lives, ensuring that every promise is brought to fruition, no matter how small or seemingly insignificant the detail.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly mundane list of towns in Joshua 15:40 offers a profound reassurance of God's unwavering faithfulness and meticulous care. Just as God precisely fulfilled His promise to give Israel a physical inheritance, down to every town and boundary, so too does He meticulously work out His purposes in our lives. This verse reminds us that God is a God of detail, not just grand plans. He is attentive to the seemingly small, obscure parts of our journey, orchestrating them for our good and His glory. This should inspire deep trust, knowing that if God was so precise in delivering a physical land, He is infinitely more precise and faithful in securing our spiritual inheritance and guiding our steps. We are called to live with confidence in His sovereign plan, even when the path seems like a mere list of unknown places, trusting that His detailed provision extends to every aspect of our existence.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the meticulous detail of God's land division in Joshua affirm His character as a faithful and orderly God?
  • In what areas of your life do you need to trust God's meticulous care and faithfulness, even when His plans seem slow or detailed?
  • How does understanding Israel's physical inheritance deepen your appreciation for the spiritual inheritance promised to believers in Christ?

FAQ

Why are these lists of cities so detailed in the book of Joshua?

Answer: The detailed lists of cities in the book of Joshua, including those in Joshua 15, serve multiple crucial purposes. Firstly, they functioned as a legal and administrative record, defining the precise boundaries and possessions for each tribe, preventing disputes and ensuring an orderly society. Secondly, they provided tangible evidence of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants to give them the land of Canaan. Thirdly, they emphasized the historical accuracy and reality of the conquest and settlement, demonstrating that these events were not mythical but grounded in specific geographical locations. Finally, these lists underscored the identity and inheritance of each tribal family within the nation of Israel, solidifying their place in God's redemptive plan and serving as a testament to God's precise fulfillment of His word.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Joshua 15:40 meticulously details a physical inheritance for the tribe of Judah, it powerfully points forward to the ultimate, spiritual inheritance secured by Jesus Christ. The divine precision with which God divided the land for Israel foreshadows the perfect and certain plan of salvation accomplished through the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Just as the Israelites received a tangible land, believers in Christ receive an imperishable, undefiled, and unfading inheritance, kept in heaven for them (1 Peter 1:3-5). Jesus is the true "Promised Land," the ultimate rest that the earthly Canaan could only partially represent (Hebrews 4:9-11). Through His atoning sacrifice, He has guaranteed our spiritual blessings and our portion in His eternal kingdom, making us co-heirs with Him (Ephesians 1:3-14; Colossians 1:12). The divine faithfulness seen in the allocation of Cabbon, Lahmam, and Kithlish finds its supreme expression in God's unwavering commitment to bring His children into their eternal inheritance through Christ, a promise infinitely more glorious and enduring than any earthly possession.

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 15 verses 20–63

We have here a list of the several cities that fell within the lot of the tribe of Judah, which are mentioned by name, that they might know their own, and both keep it and keep to it, and might neither through cowardice nor sloth lose the possession of what was their own.

I. The cities are here named, and numbered in several classes, which they then could account for the reason of better than we can now. Here are, 1. Some that are said to be the uttermost cities towards the coast of Edom, Jos 15:21-32. Here are thirty-eight named, and yet said to be twenty-nine (Jos 15:32), because nine of these were afterwards transferred to the lot of Simeon, and are reckoned as belonging to that, as appears by comparing Jos 19:2, etc.; therefore those only are counted (though the rest are named) which remained to Judah. 2. Others that are said to be in the valley (Jos 15:33) are counted to be fourteen, yet fifteen are named; but it is probable that Gederah and Gederathaim were either two names or two parts of one and the same city. 3. Then sixteen are named without any head of distinction, Jos 15:37-41, and nine more, Jos 15:42-44. 4. Then the three Philistine-cities, Ekron, Ashdod, and Gaza, Jos 15:45-47. 5. Cities in the mountains, eleven in all (Jos 15:48-51), nine more (Jos 15:52-54), ten more (Jos 15:55-57), six more (Jos 15:58, Jos 15:59), then two (Jos 15:60), and six in the wilderness, a part of the country not so thick of inhabitants as some others were.

II. Now here, 1. We do not find Bethlehem, which was afterwards the city of David, and was ennobled by the birth of our Lord Jesus in it. But that city, which at the best was but little among the thousands of Judah (Mic 5:2), except that it was thus dignified, was now so little as not to be accounted one of the cities, but perhaps was one of the villages not named. Christ came to give honour to the places he was related to, not to receive honour from them. 2. Jerusalem is said to continue in the hands of the Jebusites (Jos 15:63), for the children of Judah could not drive them out, through their sluggishness, stupidity, and unbelief. Had they attempted it with vigour and resolution, we have reason to think God would not have been wanting to them to give them success; but they could not do it, because they would not. Jerusalem was afterwards to be the holy city, the royal city, the city of the great King, the brightest ornament of all the land of Israel. God has designed it should be so. It may therefore be justly looked upon as a punishment of their neglect to conquer other cities which God had given them that they were so long kept out of this. 3. Among the cities of Judah (in all 114) we meet with Libnah, which in Joram's days revolted, and probably set up for a free independent state (Kg2 8:22), and Lachish, where king Amaziah was slain (Kg1 14:19); it led the dance in idolatry (Mic 1:13); it was the beginning of sin to the daughter of Zion. Giloh, Ahithophel's town, is here mentioned, and Tekoa, of which the prophet Amos was, and near which Jehoshaphat obtained that glorious victory, Ch2 20:20, etc., and Maresha, where Asa was a conqueror. Many of the cities of this tribe occur in the history of David's troubles. Adullam, Ziph, Keilah, Maon, Engedi, Ziklag, here reckoned in this tribe, were places near which David had most of his haunts; for, though sometimes Saul drove him out from the inheritance of the Lord, yet he kept as close to it as he could. The wilderness of Judah he frequented much, and in it John Baptist preached, and there the kingdom of heaven commenced, Mat 3:1. The riches of this country no doubt answered Jacob's blessing of this tribe, that he should wash his garments in wine, Gen 49:11. And, in general, Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise, not envy.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–63. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 15:40 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.