Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Amam, and Shema, and Moladah,
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Amam H538, and Shema H8090, and Moladah H4137,
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Amam, Sh'ma, Moladah,
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Amam, Shema, Moladah,
Ask
American Standard Version
Amam, and Shema, and Moladah,
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Amam, Shema, Moladah,
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Amam, and Shema, and Moladah,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Amam, and Shema, and Moladah,
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 6,229 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Joshua 15:26 meticulously lists Amam, Shema, and Moladah as towns within the vast inheritance allotted to the tribe of Judah. This verse is part of a comprehensive geographical survey in Joshua 15:21-63, which details the cities and boundaries belonging to Judah in the Promised Land. It serves as a testament to God's unwavering faithfulness in fulfilling His ancient covenant promises to Israel by providing them with a tangible, precisely defined inheritance.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Joshua 15:26 is situated within the latter half of the Book of Joshua, which transitions from the military conquest of Canaan (Joshua 1-12) to the detailed division of the land among the twelve tribes of Israel (Joshua 13-21). Specifically, chapter 15 is dedicated entirely to the extensive land allotment for the tribe of Judah, the largest and most prominent tribe. The chapter meticulously details Judah's boundaries and lists numerous cities within its territory, organized by geographical regions such as the Negeb, the Shephelah, and the hill country. The inclusion of specific towns like Amam, Shema, and Moladah underscores the thoroughness and precision of this divine distribution, emphasizing the complete fulfillment of God's promise to provide a permanent dwelling place for His people. This detailed cataloging ensured clarity regarding tribal claims and established the legal basis for their habitation, preventing future disputes over territory.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: Following the successful campaigns led by Joshua, the Israelites were transitioning from a nomadic, conquering force to a settled nation, establishing their national identity and fulfilling the covenant promises made to Abraham regarding the land of Canaan. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, land ownership was central to identity, status, and economic stability. The meticulous surveys, often involving the casting of lots as seen in Joshua 14:1-2, were not merely bureaucratic exercises but divinely sanctioned acts that prevented future disputes among the tribes and ensured that each family and clan received their designated portion. The naming of specific towns, even seemingly minor ones, provided concrete proof of the land's transfer and possession, solidifying Israel's claim to the territory and marking the end of their wilderness wanderings.

  • Key Themes: The meticulous listing of towns like Amam, Shema, and Moladah in Joshua 15 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the Book of Joshua and the broader biblical narrative. First, it powerfully demonstrates Divine Faithfulness and Fulfillment. Every named town, no matter how small, is tangible evidence that God is true to His word, having delivered on His ancient promise to give the land to the descendants of Jacob (Genesis 15:18). Second, it highlights God's commitment to Order and Specificity. The division of the land was not haphazard but a carefully orchestrated act, reflecting divine precision and foresight, ensuring each tribe received its designated portion and establishing a stable society. This meticulousness underscores God's sovereignty over every detail of His plan. Third, the passage emphasizes the critical concept of Inheritance. For the Israelites, the land was their physical inheritance, a place of rest and blessing after generations of wandering and warfare. This physical inheritance foreshadows the greater spiritual inheritance that believers have in Christ, a theme developed extensively in the New Testament (e.g., Ephesians 1:11).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Amam (Hebrew, ʼĂmâm', H538): From אֵם; gathering-spot; Amam, a place in Palestine. This town name appears only once in the biblical text, here in Joshua 15:26. As a "gathering-spot," it suggests a place where people would naturally congregate, perhaps for water, trade, or community, underscoring its role as a recognized, albeit possibly small, settlement within Judah's comprehensive inheritance. Its inclusion emphasizes the meticulous detail of the land division.
  • Shema (Hebrew, Shᵉmâʻ', H8090): For שֶׁמַע; Shema, a place in Palestine. This name is also listed uniquely as a town in this context. While the Hebrew root שָׁמַע (shama') commonly means "to hear" or "to obey," here it functions as a geographical marker, a specific place name. Its presence highlights the exhaustive mapping of Judah's territory, ensuring no area was overlooked in the divine distribution, regardless of its prominence.
  • Moladah (Hebrew, Môwlâdâh', H4137): From יָלַד; birth; Moladah, a place in Palestine. Meaning "birth" or "nativity," Moladah was a more significant town than the other two, as evidenced by its mention in later biblical texts (e.g., 1 Chronicles 4:28 and Nehemiah 11:26). Its name, "birth," might suggest a place of origin, a new beginning, or a place of significant population growth, perhaps reflecting the new life and settlement the Israelites found in the Promised Land. Its continued existence into the post-exilic period attests to the enduring significance of these ancient geographical markers.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Amam,": The first town listed in this specific cluster within the Negeb region of Judah's territory. Its simple mention, without further description, underscores the exhaustive nature of the land allocation, demonstrating that every piece of the promised land, down to seemingly minor localities, was accounted for in God's fulfillment of His covenant.
  • "and Shema,": The second town, connected by the conjunction "and," indicating its contiguous or proximate location to Amam within the same region. The repetition of the conjunction "and" throughout the chapter emphasizes the exhaustive nature of the list, ensuring that the boundaries and contents of Judah's inheritance were clearly defined and understood, leaving no room for ambiguity.
  • "and Moladah,": The third town in this sequence, also linked by "and," completing this specific cluster of settlements. Moladah's later historical significance suggests it was a more substantial settlement. Its inclusion here underlines the comprehensive scope of Judah's inheritance, encompassing both minor and more prominent locations, all part of God's faithful and detailed provision for His people.

Literary Devices

The primary literary device at play in Joshua 15:26, and indeed throughout much of Joshua 15, is Cataloging or List-making. This extensive enumeration of towns and boundaries serves a crucial purpose: to provide irrefutable, detailed evidence of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His land promises to Israel. The sheer volume and specificity of the names lend an air of authenticity and legal precision to the narrative, transforming abstract promises into tangible realities. The device of Repetition is also evident through the consistent use of the conjunction "and" to link the names, creating a rhythmic, cumulative effect that underscores the exhaustive nature of the list and the completeness of the inheritance. While not direct, there is an underlying Symbolism in these lists; they symbolize divine order, the fulfillment of covenant, and the establishment of God's people in their promised rest, a rest achieved through God's power and faithfulness.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Joshua 15:26, though a mere list of names, profoundly underscores the theological truth of God's meticulous faithfulness. It demonstrates that God is not vague in His promises but precise and thorough in their fulfillment. The physical inheritance of land for Judah, down to every named town, serves as a tangible testament to God's unwavering commitment to His covenant people. This historical reality provides a foundational assurance for believers today: if God was so painstakingly detailed in fulfilling a physical promise, how much more can we trust Him to fulfill His spiritual promises concerning our salvation, provision, and eternal inheritance? The very "mundaneness" of the list elevates God's character, revealing a God who cares about every detail of His plan and His people's well-being, ensuring His Word is always true.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The detailed listing of towns in Joshua 15:26 might seem like an obscure historical record, but it offers profound lessons for contemporary believers. It serves as a powerful reminder that God is a God of meticulous detail, who oversees every aspect of His divine plan and cares deeply about the specifics of our lives. Just as He precisely allocated land to His people, He orchestrates the circumstances of our existence, working all things according to His sovereign will for our good and His glory. This passage encourages us to trust in God's promises, knowing that His Word is utterly reliable and His faithfulness is unwavering. If He fulfilled physical promises with such precision, we can confidently lean on His spiritual promises for our salvation, provision, and future. Furthermore, it challenges us to appreciate the entirety of Scripture, recognizing that even seemingly "boring" lists contribute to a grander narrative of God's character and His redemptive plan, revealing His order, His faithfulness, and His comprehensive care for His people.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does God's meticulous attention to detail in the land allocation, as seen in Joshua 15:26, encourage you regarding His care for the specific details of your own life?
  • What promises of God are you currently trusting Him to fulfill, and how does this passage reinforce your confidence in His faithfulness?
  • In what ways can you cultivate a greater appreciation for seemingly "mundane" or detailed passages in Scripture, recognizing their contribution to God's overarching story?

FAQ

Why does the Bible include such detailed lists of towns and boundaries?

Answer: The inclusion of detailed lists of towns and boundaries, like those in Joshua 15:26, serves several crucial purposes. First, it provides concrete, tangible evidence of God's faithfulness in fulfilling His ancient covenant promises to Abraham and his descendants that they would inherit the land of Canaan (e.g., Genesis 12:7). Second, these lists functioned as legal documents, defining the precise inheritance of each tribe and clan, thereby preventing disputes and establishing clear ownership. This was vital for the orderly settlement and governance of the newly formed nation. Third, the meticulous detail underscores God's sovereignty and His involvement in every aspect of His people's lives, from grand military victories to the specific allocation of land. It demonstrates His commitment to order, justice, and the precise fulfillment of His divine plan.

What was the process for dividing the land among the tribes?

Answer: The division of the land was a divinely guided process, primarily overseen by Joshua, Eleazar the priest, and the heads of the tribal families (as described in Joshua 14:1). The land was divided by lot, a method used in ancient Israel to discern God's will (e.g., Proverbs 16:33). While the specific mechanics of the lot are not fully detailed, it ensured that the allocation was not based on human preference or power struggles but on divine providence. The size of the inheritance for each tribe was also influenced by their population, as indicated in Numbers 26:54. This combination of divine guidance and practical considerations ensured a fair and equitable distribution, reflecting God's perfect wisdom and justice.

Do these specific towns have any further biblical significance?

Answer: While Amam and Shema are only mentioned in this verse as part of Judah's inheritance list, Moladah does appear again in later biblical texts. It is mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:28 as a city inhabited by the tribe of Simeon (indicating a possible shared or later transferred territory) and significantly in Nehemiah 11:26 as one of the towns re-inhabited by Judahites after the Babylonian exile. This later mention highlights the enduring historical and geographical reality of these ancient settlements, reinforcing the accuracy and historical depth of the biblical record and demonstrating God's continued oversight of His people's dwelling places even through periods of exile and return.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The detailed land inheritance in Joshua 15:26, though seemingly a dry geographical list, finds its ultimate and profound fulfillment in Jesus Christ. The physical land of Canaan, given as a place of rest and inheritance to Israel, powerfully foreshadows the spiritual inheritance and eternal rest believers receive in Christ. Just as God meticulously fulfilled His promise of a physical dwelling place, He has perfectly fulfilled His greater promise of salvation and eternal life through His Son. Christ is our true and lasting "inheritance," in whom "we have obtained an inheritance" (Ephesians 1:11). The land provided security and identity for the Israelites, but Christ provides ultimate security, peace, and a new identity as children of God (John 1:12). The "rest" found in the land (Joshua 21:44) points to the deeper, spiritual rest available in Christ, who invites all who are weary and burdened to find rest in Him (Matthew 11:28). Ultimately, every promise of God, including the promise of an inheritance, finds its resounding "Yes" and "Amen" in Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 1:20), who is the ultimate fulfillment of God's meticulous and faithful plan for humanity, securing for us an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven (1 Peter 1:4).

Copy as

Commentary on Joshua 15 verses 20–63

We have here a list of the several cities that fell within the lot of the tribe of Judah, which are mentioned by name, that they might know their own, and both keep it and keep to it, and might neither through cowardice nor sloth lose the possession of what was their own.

I. The cities are here named, and numbered in several classes, which they then could account for the reason of better than we can now. Here are, 1. Some that are said to be the uttermost cities towards the coast of Edom, Jos 15:21-32. Here are thirty-eight named, and yet said to be twenty-nine (Jos 15:32), because nine of these were afterwards transferred to the lot of Simeon, and are reckoned as belonging to that, as appears by comparing Jos 19:2, etc.; therefore those only are counted (though the rest are named) which remained to Judah. 2. Others that are said to be in the valley (Jos 15:33) are counted to be fourteen, yet fifteen are named; but it is probable that Gederah and Gederathaim were either two names or two parts of one and the same city. 3. Then sixteen are named without any head of distinction, Jos 15:37-41, and nine more, Jos 15:42-44. 4. Then the three Philistine-cities, Ekron, Ashdod, and Gaza, Jos 15:45-47. 5. Cities in the mountains, eleven in all (Jos 15:48-51), nine more (Jos 15:52-54), ten more (Jos 15:55-57), six more (Jos 15:58, Jos 15:59), then two (Jos 15:60), and six in the wilderness, a part of the country not so thick of inhabitants as some others were.

II. Now here, 1. We do not find Bethlehem, which was afterwards the city of David, and was ennobled by the birth of our Lord Jesus in it. But that city, which at the best was but little among the thousands of Judah (Mic 5:2), except that it was thus dignified, was now so little as not to be accounted one of the cities, but perhaps was one of the villages not named. Christ came to give honour to the places he was related to, not to receive honour from them. 2. Jerusalem is said to continue in the hands of the Jebusites (Jos 15:63), for the children of Judah could not drive them out, through their sluggishness, stupidity, and unbelief. Had they attempted it with vigour and resolution, we have reason to think God would not have been wanting to them to give them success; but they could not do it, because they would not. Jerusalem was afterwards to be the holy city, the royal city, the city of the great King, the brightest ornament of all the land of Israel. God has designed it should be so. It may therefore be justly looked upon as a punishment of their neglect to conquer other cities which God had given them that they were so long kept out of this. 3. Among the cities of Judah (in all 114) we meet with Libnah, which in Joram's days revolted, and probably set up for a free independent state (Kg2 8:22), and Lachish, where king Amaziah was slain (Kg1 14:19); it led the dance in idolatry (Mic 1:13); it was the beginning of sin to the daughter of Zion. Giloh, Ahithophel's town, is here mentioned, and Tekoa, of which the prophet Amos was, and near which Jehoshaphat obtained that glorious victory, Ch2 20:20, etc., and Maresha, where Asa was a conqueror. Many of the cities of this tribe occur in the history of David's troubles. Adullam, Ziph, Keilah, Maon, Engedi, Ziklag, here reckoned in this tribe, were places near which David had most of his haunts; for, though sometimes Saul drove him out from the inheritance of the Lord, yet he kept as close to it as he could. The wilderness of Judah he frequented much, and in it John Baptist preached, and there the kingdom of heaven commenced, Mat 3:1. The riches of this country no doubt answered Jacob's blessing of this tribe, that he should wash his garments in wine, Gen 49:11. And, in general, Judah, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise, not envy.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 20–63. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Joshua 15:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.