Hebrews 6:1

Now, how long shall we saw away along the same line on this question [i.e., what is permitted], when we have a long-standing practice which by anticipation has all but settled the question? Even though no scriptural passage prescribes it, it is strengthened by a custom that certainly arose from tradition. How can anything become normal practice if it has not first been handed down to us? But, you tell me, “You must always have a written source if you are going to plead the force of tradition.”Let us look into the matter, then, of whether or not a tradition without a written source should be accepted. The answer will certainly be no if we cannot adduce examples of other observations which are without written source in Scripture and rest solely on the basis of tradition and yet have come to have the force of custom. To begin, for instance, with baptism: When we are about to enter the water, and, as a matter of fact, even a short while before, we declare in the presence of the congregation before the bishop that we renounce the devil, his pomps and his angels. After that, we are immersed in the water three times, making a somewhat fuller pledge than the Lord has prescribed in the gospel. After this, having stepped forth from the font, we are given a taste of a mixture of milk and honey37 and from that day, for a whole week, we forego our daily bath. We also receive the sacrament of the Eucharist that the Lord entrusted to all at the hour for supper, at our early morning meetings, and then from the hand of none but the bishops. Further, we make offerings for the dead on their anniversary to celebrate their birthday of eternal life.
We consider fasting or kneeling during service on Sundays to be unlawful, and we enjoy the same privilege from Easter until Pentecost. We also are upset if any of our bread or wine falls to the earth at the Lord’s Supper. Lastly, we make the sign of the cross on our foreheads at every turn, at our going in or coming out of the house, while dressing, while putting on our shoes, when we are taking a bath, before and after meals, when we light the lamps, when we go to bed or sit down, and in all the ordinary actions of daily life.

Warning, accordingly, the disciples to omit all first principles, and strive rather after perfection, and not lay again the foundations of repentance from the works of the dead, he says: "For impossible it is that they who have once been illuminated, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have participated in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the word of God and found it sweet, when they shall-their age already setting-have fallen away, should be again recalled unto repentance, crucifying again for themselves the Son of God, and dishonouring Him." "For the earth which hath drunk the rain often descending upon it, and hath borne grass apt for them on whose account it is tilled withal, attaineth God's blessing; but if it bring forth thorns, it is reprobate, and nighest to cursing, whose end is (doomed) unto utter burning.

But just as the doctrine of providence is not at all weakened because of those things which are not understood by those who have once honestly accepted it, so neither is the divine character of Scripture, which extends to the whole of it, lost because our weakness cannot discover in every expression the hidden splendor of the doctrines concealed in common and unattractive style. For "we have the treasure in earthen vessels, that the exceeding greatness of the power of God may shine forth" and may not be reckoned as coming from us who are but human beings.… Therefore, since a celestial or even a supercelestial power compels us to worship the only Creator, let us leave the doctrine of the beginning of Christ, i.e., the elements, and "endeavor to go on to perfection," in order that the wisdom spoken to the perfect may be spoken also to us.

What is "the beginning of the doctrine"? He goes on to state it himself, saying, "not laying again" (these are his words) "the foundation of repentance from dead works, and faith toward God, of the doctrine of baptisms and of laying on of hands, of the resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment."

But if this be "the Beginning," what else is our doctrine save to repent "from dead works," and through the Spirit to receive "the faith," in "the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment"? But what is "the Beginning"? "The Beginning," he says, is nothing else than this, when there is not a strict life. For as it is necessary to instruct one who is entering on the study of grammar, in the Elements first, so also must the Christian know these things accurately, and have no doubt concerning them. And should he again have need of teaching, he has not yet the foundation. For one who is firmly grounded ought to be fixed and to stand steady, and not be moved about. But if one who has been catechised and baptized is going ten years afterwards to hear again about the Faith, and that we ought to "believe" in "the resurrection of the dead," he does not yet have the foundation, he is again seeking after the beginning of the Christian religion. For that the Faith is the foundation, and the rest the building, hear him [the Apostle] saying; "I have laid the foundation and another buildeth thereupon." (1 Cor. iii. 10.) "If any man build upon this foundation, gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble." (1 Cor. iii. 12.)

"Not laying again" (he says) "the foundation of repentance from dead works."

But what is, "let us go on unto perfection"? Let us henceforth proceed (he means) even to the very roof, that is, let us have the best life. For as in the case of the letters the Alpha involves the whole, and as the foundation, the whole building, so also does full assurance concerning the Faith involve purity of life. And without this it is not possible to be a Christian, as without foundations there can be no building; nor skill in literature without the letters. Still if one should be always going round about the letters, or if about the foundation, not about the building, he will never gain anything.

Do not however think that the Faith is depreciated by being called elementary: for it is indeed the whole power: for when he says, "For every one that useth milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe" (c. v. 13), it is not this which he calls "milk." But to be still doubting about these things is [a sign] of a mind feeble, and needing many discourses. For these are the wholesome doctrines. For we call him "a perfect man" [i.e. "of full age"] who with the faith has a right life; but if any one have faith, yet does evil, and is in doubt concerning [the faith] itself, and brings disgrace on the doctrine, him we shall with reason call "a babe," in that he has gone back again to the beginning. So that even if we have been ten thousand years in the faith, yet are not firm in it, we are babes; when we show a life not in conformity with it; when we are still laying a foundation.

But besides [their way of] life he brings another charge also against these [Hebrews], as being shaken to and fro, and needing "to lay a foundation of repentance from dead works." For he who changes from one to another, giving up this, and choosing that, ought first to condemn this, and to be separated from the system, and then to pass to the other. But if he intends again to lay hold on the first, how shall he touch the second?

What then of the Law (he says)? We have condemned it, and again we run back to it. This is not a shifting about, for here also [under the Gospel] we have a law. "Do we then" (he says) "make void the law through faith? God forbid, yea we establish the Law." (Rom. iii. 31.) I was speaking concerning evil deeds. For he that intends to pursue virtue ought to condemn wickedness first, and then go in pursuit of it. For repentance cannot prove them clean. For this cause they were straightway baptized, that what they were unable to accomplish by themselves, this might be effected by the grace of Christ. Neither then does repentance suffice for purification, but men must first receive baptism. At all events, it was necessary to come to baptism, having condemned the sins thereby and given sentence against them.

The beginning of Christ was from within Judaism—for he lived as a Jew according to the law. He says because of this, “Leaving this behind, let us be borne to that maturity,” knowing that the one about to be a high priest apart from the law must be a priest “according to the order of Melchizedek.”“Dead works and faith in God, ritual washing.” For Christians the earthly things are dead. Therefore he says that it is out of place that they neglect the way of life based on faith and the mortification of all things and return to ablutions according to the law. When the Lord came, he preached repentance, saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of God has drawn near,” but it was “a repentance from dead works.” … This, then, is what he says: it is not necessary to run back to the law, leaving behind the repentance from dead works and faith in God and baptism25—which he named in the plural because of the multitude of those deemed worthy. And he spoke of baptisms and the teaching and the laying on of hands through which are the elections, and the hope of the resurrection and the rest. And he has prepared this beforehand, since the priests in the law uphold the law with a vengeance, but Melchizedek was outside the law. Not coming from the levitical priesthood, he followed “the order of Melchizedek.” He says that it was not necessary to leave behind the priest in the order of Melchizedek to pursue those who are priests under the law, so that the things written in the law might stand. But he called those things in the law a “foundation,” since it has become a preamble of godliness for men.

Although you ought to be teachers, not only are you not teachers, but also you cannot even learn anything except the rather rudimentary and elementary and simple things, and even these things not absolutely but weaker than the beginning of the oracles of God. He does not say the “elements of the oracles,” but the elements of “the beginning” of the oracles. Most likely the elements of the oracles of God would be the words about the incarnation, but the elements of the “beginning” of the oracles are the things about which he goes on to say, “not laying again a foundation,” etc.The argument of the arrangement is this: “Therefore, leaving behind the word of the beginning of Christ, let us be carried to perfection, and we will do this, if God permits.”
“The Word of Christ.” What sort of word? The word of teaching that it is necessary to lay down a foundation of repentance from dead works, the word of teaching that it is necessary to believe in God, the word of teaching that one must be baptized, the word of teaching that one must be deemed worthy of the Holy Spirit, the word of teaching that there will be a resurrection and that there will be a judgment. For the word and the teaching have a common origin in every respect.

When he says to leave behind the elementary matters concerning Christ and to leave behind the word which stops any progress at the beginning and to be carried “to perfection,” he does not simply say perfection in its proper sense, but the perfection, as it were, that exists between the rudiments of the oracles of God and the heavenly perfection. For the “elements of the beginning of the oracles of God” consist of renouncing Satan and his works, believing in God, being baptized, receiving the Holy Spirit, knowing about the resurrection of the dead and believing that there is a judgment. These things are the elements of the beginning of the oracles of God. But the “elements of the oracles of God”—not merely the beginning of the oracles of God—is to know that Christ suffered on our behalf, that he removed our sins, that he wrought our salvation for us, that he has become our high priest, that he offered himself on our behalf, and such other things. And “perfection” in renouncing Satan and his cohorts consists of advancement in the virtues and endurance amid tribulations, persecutions and periods of testing. And heavenly “perfection” is the exact apprehension concerning the divine teaching of Christ, insofar as is humanly possible. So first we believe and are baptized, then we know what sort of things Christ underwent for our sake and what sort of things he did in his human nature, then we are perfected in the virtues, then we are deemed worthy of the knowledge which is in accordance with divine wisdom.

“teaching about Christ." What kind of teaching? The teaching [λόγον] of the doctrine [διδαχῆς], of the necessity to lay the foundation of repentance from dead works, the teaching of the doctrine, of the necessity of faith in God; the teaching of the doctrine, of the necessity to be baptized; the teaching of the doctrine, of the necessity to be deemed worthy of the Holy Spirit; the teaching of the doctrine, that there is resurrection, that there will be judgment. For in common, according to all, both the teaching and the doctrine.

The statement is beyond dispute; for the teaching has been delivered through a medium to all that is present, and this is the agreement according to its meaning: not to overthrow the foundation of the teaching again, but thus to show in enumeration the matters concerning the foundation of the teaching.Paul wishes to say that for those who now first approach faith, we lay down as a sort of foundation the teaching concerning these things, first reasonably urging them to repent from works that lead to death; when they have repented, to believe in God; when they have believed, to be baptized; when baptized, to submit to the laying on of hands for the partaking of the Spirit; having thus partaken in this, no longer to doubt concerning the resurrection from the dead, knowing that there will be a judgment when they will be raised and live again, and that a continuous and just reward awaits them for what we have lived like here.

Perhaps these, still clinging to the law, thinking more in Jewish manners, because there are different and many baptisms in the law, wished also that the baptism of the New Covenant, which grants regeneration, should be administered many times, because they wished that the remission of sins should be considered worthy only once.

“the laying on of hands.” Those things that take place in baptism; or there, when the apostles laid on their hands, they gave the Spirit, which Simon the sorcerer also sought. (Acts 8:18-19)
“the resurrection of the dead.” For this also takes place in baptism through the form of rising up, and is confirmed in the confession; for we confess that we believe in the resurrection of the dead.
“and eternal judgment.” That is, of the coming judgment, which grants either eternal good or punishment. This seems to say: since it was likely that they would be shaken, although they had already believed, either that if we live deeply, or fall away from faith, we shall be baptized again, or again be able to wash away sins, and to share in the same things as before. For they err in thinking these things.
"And this we will do." Which? To be carried to perfection.
"if God permits." The phrase "if God permits" is not to indicate that God does not always permit (for God always permits the good and perfect), but as is customary for us to say, If God wills, we will do this. At the same time, it also teaches us from this that everything depends on that will, and we should not rely confidently or arrogantly on our own judgment and power, even in matters generally acknowledged. This is explicitly encouraged by the apostle James.

"on to perfection." Having said this, he lets go of the elementary and foundational teachings concerning Christ and is carried towards perfection, not simply referring to the ultimate perfection, but as if to that which is between the elementary teachings of the words of God and the highest perfection. For there are indeed elementary principles of the words of God, which must be put away from Satan and his works, to believe in God, to be baptized, to receive the Holy Spirit, to know the resurrection of the dead, to believe that there will be a judgment. These are the elementary teachings of the words of God. The fundamentals of the words of God, and not the elementary teachings of God, are to know that Christ suffered for us, that He took upon Himself our sins, that He accomplished salvation for us, that He became our high priest, that He offered Himself for us, and anything similar. The perfection of rejecting Satan and his associates is the progress in virtues, the patience in tribulations, persecutions, and temptations. The highest perfection is that concerning the theology of Christ, insofar as it is possible for a man to have an accurate understanding. First, therefore, we are baptized as believers, then we acknowledge all that Christ suffered and did for us according to His humanity, then we are perfected in the virtues, and afterward we are deemed worthy of the knowledge according to theology.

Having said above that the elementary teaching about the humanity of the Lord, and indeed the perfection of those who pertain to divinity, lest they might feel impatiently as unworthy of more perfect discourses, he also approaches to speak of more perfect matters. He speaks not in the same way as he called the perfect: (for they were not able to hear), but he skillfully approaches the discourse in another way, indeed calling baptism the elementary teaching, and the laying on of hands and the seal within it; but perfection, the idea through works. And he more clearly states what the elementary teaching is for those who have just believed, and what the perfection is.
— The following of the arrangement.

"Let us not lay again a foundation." Let us not lay another foundation again, as he says, being laid down in baptism, that is, the renunciation of the works of Satan. For once, he says, having repented, we were baptized upon them, and it is no longer necessary to do these things from the beginning.
“and of faith toward God.” For it is no longer necessary now to believe in God as if from the beginning; for you have already believed.

"of faith toward God." For it is not necessary now, as it was from the beginning, to believe in God. For you have already believed through teaching. The structure is thus. Therefore, leaving the elementary of God, what is this? The doctrine of baptisms, the laying on of hands (by which, it says, you were enlightened), and the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment, let us press on to perfection. For it is not necessary, it says, always to speak the same things; for it has been said once and has come to pass, but it is necessary, it says, also to contribute what is among you, namely, a good conduct and a faith worthy of it. For this is perfection, to be two-handed in virtue, as it were, saying; Be sober; for there is no need to live carelessly, and again to be baptized, and through the laying on of hands to receive the Holy Spirit's visitation.
“of instruction about baptism.” Not as if there were many baptisms, Paul said this in the plural; for there is one baptism (Eph. 4:5); but this follows from the context. For if he were to instruct them again, and baptize them again; and again baptize those who have fallen away; then necessarily there would be many baptisms; but this is absurd. Therefore, it is not necessary to rebaptize you; but to remain with the former baptism.

Therefore, leaving the elementary teaching of Christ, let us be carried toward perfection. And we will do this, as God permits.