Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And they said H559, Thou hast saved our lives H2421: let us find H4672 grace H2580 in the sight H5869 of my lord H113, and we will be Pharaoh's H6547 servants H5650.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
They replied, "You have saved our lives! So if it pleases my lord, we will be Pharaoh's slaves."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“You have saved our lives,” they said. “We have found favor in our lord’s eyes, and we will be Pharaoh’s servants.”
Ask
American Standard Version
And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find favor in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh’s servants.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
They said, “You have saved our lives! Let us find favor in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh’s servants.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Then they answered, Thou hast saued our liues: let vs finde grace in the sight of my Lord, and we will be Pharaohs seruants.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And they say, `Thou hast revived us; we find grace in the eyes of my lord, and have been servants to Pharaoh;'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 1,446 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 47:25 encapsulates the profound gratitude and willing submission of the Egyptian populace to Pharaoh, mediated by Joseph, for preserving their lives during the devastating famine. Having exhausted all their resources—money, livestock, and finally their land—they acknowledge Pharaoh as their savior and accept a new socio-economic order, becoming his servants and tenants who would perpetually render a fifth of their produce to the crown. This moment solidifies a significant shift in Egyptian society, centralizing power and land ownership under the monarchy in exchange for survival.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Genesis 47:25 is the climactic statement of the Egyptian people's response to Joseph's famine policy, which began with the seven years of plenty and Joseph's strategic storage of grain (Genesis 41:47-49). The preceding verses detail a progressive exchange: first, the Egyptians' money for food (Genesis 47:14); then their livestock (Genesis 47:17); and finally, their land and their very persons, declaring themselves and their land to be Pharaoh's (Genesis 47:18-22). This verse serves as the people's verbal affirmation of this new covenant with Pharaoh, establishing the system of taxation (the fifth part) that would govern their lives thereafter. It marks the successful, albeit drastic, implementation of Joseph's divinely inspired plan to preserve life during the famine, setting the stage for the continued flourishing of Jacob's family in Goshen.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ancient Egypt was an agrarian society heavily dependent on the annual inundation of the Nile River. A prolonged famine, such as the seven-year one described, would have been catastrophic, leading to widespread death and societal collapse. Pharaoh was considered a divine king, the embodiment of order (Ma'at), and the ultimate owner of all land. Joseph's policy, while seemingly harsh by modern standards, was a pragmatic and ultimately life-saving measure in a context where centralized control was essential for survival. The concept of "servants" (Hebrew: 'ebed) in this context refers to subjects or tenants, not chattel slaves. This system of state land ownership and taxation (a fifth, or 20%) was a common feature in ancient Near Eastern economies, ensuring the stability of the kingdom and the sustenance of its populace during crises. Joseph's actions effectively transformed the populace into a dependent workforce, forever indebted to the crown for their survival.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully underscores several key themes within the broader narrative of Genesis. Divine Providence is paramount, as God's unseen hand orchestrates events through Joseph to preserve not only the chosen lineage of Jacob but also the entire Egyptian nation and surrounding lands (Genesis 45:7-8). It highlights Human Dependence on a higher power, whether an earthly ruler like Pharaoh or, ultimately, God Himself, for sustenance and survival. The theme of Stewardship is also evident, as Joseph, a wise steward, manages Egypt's resources for the common good. Furthermore, the narrative explores the Sovereignty of God over natural disasters and human affairs, demonstrating His ability to turn potential catastrophe into an opportunity for His purposes, as seen throughout Joseph's life from his enslavement to his rise to power (Genesis 50:20).

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • saved (Hebrew, châyâh', H2421): This primitive root means "to live," "to revive," or "to keep alive." In this context, it signifies not merely survival but a profound act of preservation from certain death. The Egyptians recognize Joseph's (and by extension, Pharaoh's) actions as literally life-giving, rescuing them from the brink of starvation and extinction. This word emphasizes the extreme severity of their predicament and the magnitude of the rescue.
  • grace (Hebrew, chên', H2580): This word denotes "graciousness," "favor," or "kindness." The Egyptians' plea, "let us find grace," is a humble request for ongoing benevolence and goodwill from Pharaoh. It acknowledges their new, dependent status and expresses a desire for continued favor, without which their future well-being and sustenance would be uncertain. It's a recognition that their survival, though secured, still rests on the ruler's continued good pleasure.
  • servants (Hebrew, ʻebed', H5650): This term refers to "a servant," "bondman," or "subject." While it can denote various forms of service, in this specific context, it describes their new status as subjects bound by tribute and allegiance to Pharaoh. It signifies their willing submission to the new socio-economic order, transforming them from independent landowners into a populace whose livelihood and future are inextricably linked to and dependent upon the state. This was a profound and lasting shift in their societal standing.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And they said, Thou hast saved our lives": This opening clause captures the Egyptians' immediate and heartfelt response. The declaration "Thou hast saved our lives" is a profound expression of gratitude, underscoring the extreme severity of the famine and their immense relief. It's not a mere polite acknowledgment but a recognition that their most fundamental possession—life itself—was preserved by Joseph's actions, making the loss of their land and former independence a secondary concern.
  • "let us find grace in the sight of my lord": Following their expression of gratitude, this phrase reveals their humility and vulnerability. The plea for "grace" (favor) from "my lord" (Pharaoh) highlights their new, dependent position. Their future well-being and continued sustenance were now entirely contingent on the ruler's continued benevolence. It signifies a desire for ongoing favor and a recognition that their survival, though secured, still rested on the good pleasure of the one in power.
  • "and we will be Pharaoh's servants.": This final clause signifies their willing and complete submission to the new socio-economic order. By declaring themselves "Pharaoh's servants," they acknowledge their transformation from independent landowners to a populace whose livelihood and future are inextricably linked to and dependent upon the state. This statement solidifies the agreement, establishing a system where they would cultivate the land as tenants and render a portion of their produce to the crown.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices to convey its profound meaning. Hyperbole is evident in the declaration, "Thou hast saved our lives," as it emphasizes the extreme nature of the famine and the life-or-death stakes involved, even though their lives were not literally "lost" but on the brink of perishing. The Irony lies in the fact that their physical salvation came at the cost of their economic independence and land ownership, highlighting a complex exchange of freedom for survival. There is also a strong element of Gratitude expressed, serving as a powerful emotional response to their deliverance. Furthermore, the phrase "find grace in the sight of my lord" functions as a Plea or supplication, underscoring their humble and dependent posture before Pharaoh, who is now their sovereign and provider.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 47:25 offers a powerful glimpse into the interplay of divine providence, human agency, and the nature of dependence. The Egyptians' profound gratitude for the preservation of their lives, even at the cost of their land and independence, serves as a poignant reminder that life itself is the ultimate gift, and all material possessions are secondary. This narrative illustrates God's sovereign hand working through human instruments (Joseph and Pharaoh) to preserve not only the chosen family of Jacob but also an entire nation, demonstrating His universal care and ability to turn crisis into a means of sustenance. The willing submission of the people to Pharaoh, acknowledging his life-giving role, foreshadows a deeper spiritual truth: our ultimate dependence on God for all things, including life, sustenance, and salvation.

  • Genesis 50:20 Joseph's later declaration to his brothers, "You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today," perfectly encapsulates the divine purpose behind the entire famine narrative, including the Egyptians' survival.
  • Leviticus 25:23 The system of land ownership established in Egypt stands in stark contrast to God's law for Israel, where the land was ultimately God's, and His people were merely sojourners and tenants, preventing permanent land alienation and promoting a different kind of dependence—on God, not a human sovereign.
  • 1 Corinthians 4:7 The Egyptians' acknowledgment of Pharaoh as the source of their salvation parallels the theological truth that all we have and are is a gift from God, prompting a posture of humility and gratitude rather than self-reliance.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 47:25 provides enduring insights into human nature, divine providence, and the dynamics of dependence. The Egyptians' overwhelming gratitude for the preservation of their lives, even when it meant surrendering their independence and possessions, challenges us to cultivate a profound sense of thankfulness for the fundamental gift of life and basic necessities, especially amidst personal or societal difficulties. This narrative powerfully reminds us that God's providence often works through unexpected channels and even through severe crises to accomplish His purposes of preservation and sustenance. It prompts us to consider our own sources of security and provision: do we place our ultimate trust in our possessions, our independence, or our own efforts, or do we acknowledge our fundamental dependence on God's grace and provision? The Egyptians' willing submission to Pharaoh as "servants" can serve as a spiritual parallel to our call to acknowledge God's ultimate ownership of all things and our role as faithful stewards of what He has entrusted to us, living in humble dependence on His sovereign care rather than relying solely on our own resources.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life are you most tempted to rely on your own resources or independence, rather than acknowledging God's ultimate provision?
  • How can cultivating a deeper sense of gratitude for the basic gift of life transform your perspective during times of scarcity or difficulty?
  • What does it mean, practically, to live as a "servant" of God in a world that often prizes self-sufficiency and autonomy?

FAQ

What kind of "servants" did the Egyptians become under Joseph's policy?

Answer: The Hebrew word 'ebed (H5650), translated as "servants" in Genesis 47:25, does not imply chattel slavery, where people are property to be bought and sold. Instead, it describes their new status as subjects or tenants bound by tribute and labor to Pharaoh. They became a populace whose land was now owned by the crown, and in return for their lives and the right to cultivate the land, they were obligated to give a fifth (20%) of their produce to Pharaoh. This was a form of economic and social restructuring, transforming independent landowners into state-dependent subjects.

Was Joseph's policy fair or exploitative?

Answer: From the perspective of the people in Genesis 47:25, it was seen as a life-saving measure, not exploitation. They willingly gave up their money, livestock, and land because the alternative was certain starvation. Joseph's policy, while centralizing power and wealth under Pharaoh, also ensured the survival of the entire population during an unprecedented and devastating famine. It was a pragmatic and effective solution to a catastrophic crisis, designed to preserve life, which the people themselves acknowledged with profound gratitude. It prevented societal collapse and widespread death.

How does this system of land ownership in Egypt compare to God's law for Israel?

Answer: The system established in Egypt, where all land (except that of the priests) became Pharaoh's property, stands in stark contrast to God's law for Israel. In Israel, God declared Himself the ultimate owner of the land (Leviticus 25:23), and the land was to be distributed among the tribes and families as an inheritance, not owned by the king. Provisions like the Year of Jubilee (Leviticus 25:10) ensured that land would revert to its original families every 50 years, preventing permanent accumulation of wealth and power and promoting a more equitable distribution. This reflected God's ultimate sovereignty and His provision for His people, emphasizing their direct dependence on Him rather than on a human monarch for their land and livelihood.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of Joseph, culminating in the Egyptians' grateful submission in Genesis 47:25, powerfully foreshadows the redemptive work of Christ. Joseph, as a wise and compassionate savior who provides life-sustaining bread during a time of famine, serves as a profound type of Christ, the true "Bread of Life" who offers eternal sustenance to a world perishing in spiritual famine (John 6:35). Just as the Egyptians willingly surrendered their possessions and independence for the preservation of their physical lives, recognizing Joseph as their deliverer, so too are believers called to surrender their lives and trust in Christ for salvation, acknowledging Him as their ultimate Lord and Savior (Romans 10:9). The "grace" sought by the Egyptians from their earthly lord finds its ultimate fulfillment in the boundless and unmerited grace freely offered by Christ, through whom we receive not just physical life, but eternal life and a new status as children and beloved servants of the Most High God (Ephesians 2:8-9; Romans 6:22). In Christ, our deepest needs are met, and our ultimate security is found not in earthly possessions or independence, but in humble dependence on Him.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 47 verses 13–26

Care being taken of Jacob and his family, the preservation of which was especially designed by Providence in Joseph's advancement, an account is now given of the saving of the kingdom of Egypt too from ruin; for God is King of nations as well as King of saints, and provideth food for all flesh. Joseph now returns to the management of that great trust which Pharaoh had lodged in his hand. It would have been pleasing enough to him to have gone and lived with his father and brethren in Goshen; but his employment would not permit it. When he had seen his father, and seen him well settled, he applied himself as closely as ever to the execution of his office. Note, Even natural affection must give way to necessary business. Parents and children must be content to be absent one from another, when it is necessary, on either side, for the service of God or their generation. In Joseph's transactions with the Egyptians observe,

I. The great extremity that Egypt, and the parts adjacent, were reduced to by the famine. There was no bread, and they fainted (Gen 47:13), they were ready to die, Gen 47:15, Gen 47:19. 1. See here what a dependence we have upon God's providence. If its usual favours are suspended but for a while, we die, we perish, we all perish. All our wealth would not keep us from starving if the rain of heaven were but withheld for two or three years. See how much we lie at God's mercy, and let us keep ourselves always in his love. 2. See how much we smart by our own improvidence. If all the Egyptians had done for themselves in the seven years of plenty as Joseph did for Pharaoh, they had not been now in these straits; but they regarded not the warning they had of the years of famine, concluding that tomorrow shall be as this day, next year as this, and much more abundant. Note, Because man knows not his time (his time of gathering when he has it) therefore his misery is great upon him when the spending time comes, Ecc 8:6, Ecc 8:7. 3. See how early God put a difference between the Egyptians and the Israelites, as afterwards in the plagues, Exo 8:22; Exo 9:4, Exo 9:26; Exo 10:23. Jacob and his family, though strangers, were plentifully fed on free cost, while the Egyptians were dying for want. See Isa 65:13, My servants shall eat, but you shall be hungry. Happy art thou, O Israel. Whoever wants, God's children shall not, Psa 34:10.

II. The price they had come up to, for their supply, in this exigency. 1. They parted with all their money which they had hoarded up, Gen 47:14. Silver and gold would not feed them, they must have corn. All the money of the kingdom was by this means brought into the exchequer. 2. When the money failed, they parted with all their cattle, those for labour, as the horses and asses, and those for food, as the flocks and the herds, Gen 47:17. By this it should seem that we may better live upon bread without flesh than upon flesh without bread. We may suppose they parted the more easily with their cattle because they had little or no grass for them; and now Pharaoh saw in reality what he had before seen in vision, nothing but lean kine. 3. When they had sold their stocks off their land, it was easy to persuade themselves (rather than starve) to sell their land too; for what good would that do them, when they had neither corn to sow it nor cattle to eat of it? They therefore sold that next, for a further supply of corn. 4. When their land was sold, so that they had nothing to live on, they must of course sell themselves, that they might live purely upon their labour, and hold their lands by the base tenure of villenage, at the courtesy of the crown. Note, Skin for skin, and all that a man hath, even liberty and property (those darling twins), will he give for his life; for life is sweet. There are few (though perhaps there are some) who would even dare to die rather than live in slavery, and dependence on an arbitrary power. And perhaps there are those who, in that case, could die by the sword, in a heat, who yet could not deliberately die by famine, which is much worse, Lam 4:9. Now it was a great mercy to the Egyptians that, in this distress, they could have corn at any rate; if they had all died for hunger, their lands perhaps would have escheated to the crown of course, for want of heirs; they therefore resolved to make the best of bad.

III. The method which Joseph took to accommodate the matter between prince and people, so that the prince might have his just advantage, and yet the people not be quite ruined. 1. For their lands, he needed not come to any bargain with them while the years of famine lasted; but when these were over (for God will not contend for ever, nor will he be always wroth) he came to an agreement, which it seems both sides were pleased with, that the people should occupy and enjoy the lands, as he thought fit to assign them, and should have seed to sow them with out of the king's stores, for their own proper use and behoof, yielding and paying only a fifth part of the yearly profits as a chief rent to the crown. This became a standing law, Gen 47:26. And it was a very good bargain to have food for their lands, when otherwise they and theirs must have starved, and then to have their lands again upon such easy terms. Note, Those ministers of state are worthy of double honour, both for wisdom and integrity, that keep the balance even between prince and people, so that liberty and property may not intrench upon prerogative, nor the prerogative bear hard upon liberty and property: in the multitude of such counsellors there is safety. If afterwards the Egyptians thought it hard to pay so great a duty to the king out of their lands, they must remember, not only how just, but how kind, the first imposing of it was. They might thankfully pay a fifth where all was due. It is observable how faithful Joseph was to him that appointed him. He did not put the money into his own pocket, nor entail the lands upon his own family; but converted both entirely to Pharaoh's use; and therefore we do not find that his posterity went out of Egypt any richer than the rest of their poor brethren. Those in public trusts, if they raise great estates, must take heed that it be not at the expense of a good conscience, which is much more valuable. 2. For their persons, he removed them to cities, Gen 47:21. He transplanted them, to show Pharaoh's sovereign power over them, and that they might, in time, forget their titles to their lands, and be the more easily reconciled to their new condition of servitude. The Jewish writers say, "He removed them thus from their former habitations because they reproached his brethren as strangers, to silence which reproach they were all made, in effect, strangers." See what changes a little time may make with a people, and how soon God can empty those from vessel to vessel who had settled upon their lees. How hard soever this seems to have been upon them, they themselves were at this time sensible of it as a very great kindness, and were thankful they were not worse used: Thou hast saved our lives, Gen 47:25. Note, There is good reason that the Saviour of our lives should be the Master of our lives. "Thou hast saved us; do what thou wilt with us."

IV. The reservation he made in favour of the priests. They were maintained on free cost, so that they needed not to sell their lands, Gen 47:22. All people will thus walk in the name of their God; they will be kind to those that attend the public service of their God, and that minister to them in holy things; and we should, in like manner, honour our God, by esteeming his ministers highly in love for their work's sake.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 13–26. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 47:25 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.