Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats; and I will make them savoury meat for thy father, such as he loveth:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Go H3212 now to the flock H6629, and fetch H3947 me from thence two H8147 good H2896 kids H1423 of the goats H5795; and I will make H6213 them savoury meat H4303 for thy father H1, such as he loveth H157:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Go to the flock, and bring me back two choice kids. I will make it tasty for your father, the way he likes it;
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Go out to the flock and bring me two choice young goats, so that I can make them into a tasty dish for your father—the kind he loves.
Ask
American Standard Version
Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats; and I will make them savory food for thy father, such as he loveth:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Go now to the flock, and get me from there two good young goats. I will make them savory food for your father, such as he loves.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Get thee nowe to the flocke, and bring me thence two good kids of the goates, that I may make pleasant meate of them for thy father, such as he loueth.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Go, I pray thee, unto the flock, and take for me from thence two good kids of the goats, and I make them tasteful things for thy father, such as he hath loved;
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Isaac and Rebekah
Isaac and Rebekah View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 737 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 27:9 records Rebekah's decisive instruction to Jacob, her favored son, to retrieve two choice young goats from their flock. This command initiates a crucial step in her elaborate scheme to deceive Isaac, her blind and aging husband, into unwittingly bestowing the highly coveted patriarchal blessing upon Jacob, rather than Esau, the rightful firstborn and Isaac's preferred son, by preparing a specific, savory meal that Isaac loved.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within the intricate and tension-filled narrative of Genesis 27, which details the deception of Isaac by Rebekah and Jacob. Immediately preceding this verse, Isaac, feeling his age and blindness, instructs Esau to hunt game and prepare a savory meal, after which he intends to give Esau the patriarchal blessing. Rebekah, overhearing this, immediately devises a counter-plan. Genesis 27:9 is her direct, actionable command to Jacob, setting in motion the elaborate charade that follows, including Jacob's disguise and the presentation of the meal. The subsequent verses detail Jacob's reluctance, Rebekah's insistence, and the execution of the deception, leading to profound familial conflict and Jacob's eventual flight.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In the ancient Near East, the patriarchal blessing was far more than a mere wish; it was a formal, binding pronouncement believed to convey spiritual authority, legal inheritance, and a divinely ordained destiny. It was typically given by the dying patriarch to his firstborn son, signifying the transfer of headship and the bulk of the family's wealth and spiritual legacy. The preparation of a special meal often accompanied such significant rituals, serving as a symbolic act of communion and a prerequisite for the solemn occasion. Familial favoritism, as seen in Isaac's preference for Esau (a skilled hunter) and Rebekah's for Jacob (a quiet tent-dweller), was common but often led to significant strife, as demonstrated vividly in this narrative.
  • Key Themes: Genesis 27:9 contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. Firstly, it highlights the theme of deception and its consequences, as Rebekah's plan, though seemingly successful in the short term, leads to deep familial division and Jacob's long exile. Secondly, it underscores the power and significance of the patriarchal blessing, demonstrating the immense value placed upon it in ancient culture and its role in shaping destiny. Thirdly, the narrative explores the complex interplay between human agency and divine sovereignty. While Rebekah and Jacob resort to manipulative means, God had already declared that "the elder shall serve the younger" in Genesis 25:23, raising questions about whether human sin is necessary for divine purposes to be fulfilled. Finally, the story vividly illustrates the destructive nature of familial favoritism, as Isaac and Rebekah's partiality for different sons fuels jealousy and leads to the breakdown of trust.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Rebekah's command in Genesis 27:9 is precise and purposeful, revealing her strategic mind at work to secure the blessing for Jacob, her favored son.

Key Word Analysis

  • good (Hebrew, ṭôwb', H2896): This word signifies something that is pleasing, beautiful, or excellent in quality. In this context, Rebekah is not merely asking for any kids but "good" ones, implying healthy, well-fed, and perhaps tender animals suitable for a special, savory dish. This choice underscores her meticulousness in attempting to perfectly replicate Esau's desired meal.
  • kids (Hebrew, gᵉdîy', H1423): This term specifically refers to young goats. The choice of young goats is significant, as their meat is generally more tender and less gamey than older animals, making it easier to prepare in a way that could mimic venison, which was Isaac's preference and Esau's specialty. This detail highlights Rebekah's practical knowledge and her intent to deceive.
  • savoury meat (Hebrew, maṭʻam', H4303): This noun denotes a delicacy, a tasty dish, or dainty meat. It implies a specially prepared, highly palatable meal designed to appeal to Isaac's particular palate. It wasn't just any food, but the specific type Isaac desired before bestowing the blessing, making it central to the deception. Rebekah's confidence in her ability to replicate this "savoury meat" is a key element of her plan.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Go now to the flock, and fetch me from thence two good kids of the goats;": This direct and immediate instruction from Rebekah to Jacob serves as the catalyst for the entire deception. The imperative "Go now" conveys urgency and decisiveness. The specificity of "two good kids of the goats" is significant; "two" suggests ensuring ample meat for a substantial meal, and perhaps (as later verses reveal) one for the meal and the other for its skins to mimic Esau's hairy arms. The choice of "kids of the goats" highlights Rebekah's meticulous planning, as goat meat, when skillfully prepared, could be made to resemble venison, which was Esau's specialty and Isaac's preference.
  • "and I will make them savoury meat for thy father, such as he loveth:": This phrase reveals Rebekah's clear intent and her intimate knowledge of Isaac's culinary preferences. Her declaration "I will make them savoury meat" demonstrates her confidence in her cooking abilities and her determination to execute the deception herself. The phrase "such as he loveth" underscores Isaac's specific culinary preference and Rebekah's exploitation of this knowledge for her manipulative ends. This detail is crucial, as Isaac's desire for this particular dish is the very condition he set for bestowing the blessing, making it the central pillar of Rebekah's deceit.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several literary devices. Direct Command is evident in Rebekah's imperative "Go now," emphasizing her authority and determination. Foreshadowing is present, as this seemingly simple domestic instruction sets the stage for the elaborate deception that will unfold, leading to significant familial strife. There is also a subtle Irony in Rebekah's attempt to provide "savoury meat" to secure a spiritual blessing, highlighting the human tendency to use earthly means for spiritual ends. The "savoury meat" itself functions as a Symbol, representing not just a meal but the means to an end, a tool for manipulation that triggers a pivotal moment in the patriarchal narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Genesis 27:9 initiates a narrative rich with theological implications, primarily concerning the tension between human will and divine purpose. While Rebekah and Jacob resort to cunning and deception to secure the blessing, God's sovereign plan for Jacob to receive the blessing had already been declared (Genesis 25:23), raising the profound question of whether God's purposes justify human sin or if He works despite human failings. The story powerfully illustrates that while God's ultimate will prevails, the means by which humans attempt to achieve it have significant, often negative, consequences, leading to broken relationships and personal hardship.

  • Genesis 25:23: God's pre-birth declaration that "the elder shall serve the younger" foreshadows the outcome of this narrative, highlighting divine election over human merit or birthright.
  • Genesis 29:25: Jacob, the deceiver, later becomes the deceived, illustrating a profound biblical principle of sowing and reaping, and the long-term consequences of dishonest actions.
  • Proverbs 12:22: This proverb directly condemns the kind of deception practiced by Rebekah and Jacob, affirming God's abhorrence of falsehood, regardless of perceived beneficial outcomes.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Genesis 27:9 serves as a profound cautionary tale, reminding us that even when our desired outcomes seem aligned with God's ultimate will, resorting to deceptive or manipulative means is never justified and invariably leads to painful consequences. Rebekah and Jacob's actions, though ultimately leading to the fulfillment of God's prophecy regarding the elder serving the younger, plunged their family into years of strife, separation, and a cycle of deceit that later afflicted Jacob himself. This narrative challenges us to cultivate unwavering integrity in all our dealings, to trust implicitly in God's perfect timing and methods, and to recognize that His sovereign purposes do not require our sinful shortcuts to be accomplished. It also underscores the destructive nature of favoritism within families, urging us to foster environments of impartial love and respect, thereby preventing the seeds of jealousy and resentment that can lead to such profound brokenness.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does Rebekah's immediate action in this verse reveal a lack of trust in God's timing or methods, despite knowing His prophecy?
  • In what ways might we, like Rebekah and Jacob, be tempted to use "shortcuts" or dishonest means to achieve what we believe is a good or divinely ordained outcome?
  • What are the long-term consequences of deception, both for the deceiver and the deceived, as illustrated by this story?

FAQ

Why did Rebekah ask for "two good kids of the goats"?

Answer: Rebekah likely requested two kids for practical reasons: to ensure there was sufficient meat to prepare a substantial and convincing "savoury meat" for Isaac, and to have extra material. Additionally, the skins of the goats were used to mimic Esau's hairy arms and neck, further aiding Jacob's disguise, as detailed in Genesis 27:16.

What is "savoury meat" and why was it so important?

Answer: "Savoury meat" translates the Hebrew maṭʻammîm, meaning 'delicacies' or 'tasty dishes'. It refers to a specially prepared, highly palatable meal that Isaac particularly loved and associated with Esau's hunting prowess. It was of paramount importance because Isaac had made the enjoyment of this specific meal a prerequisite for bestowing the patriarchal blessing, making it the central element of Rebekah's deception and the trigger for the transfer of the blessing.

Does this story imply that deception is acceptable if it fulfills God's will?

Answer: No, the story emphatically does not imply that deception is acceptable. While Jacob ultimately received the blessing, which aligned with God's earlier prophecy in Genesis 25:23, the narrative clearly portrays the negative and far-reaching consequences of Rebekah and Jacob's dishonest actions. Their deception led to profound familial strife, Jacob's exile, and a cycle of deceit that affected Jacob later in life (e.g., Genesis 29:25). God's sovereignty does not necessitate human sin to accomplish His purposes; rather, He can work through and despite human failings, demonstrating His faithfulness even when His people are faithless.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Genesis 27:9 depicts a human attempt to secure a blessing through deception and manipulation, it subtly points forward to Christ by highlighting the profound human longing for blessing and inheritance, and the flawed means often employed to obtain it. Jacob, despite his deceptive methods, received a blessing that ultimately pointed to the lineage of the Messiah, for it is through his descendants that Christ would come. However, unlike Jacob, who obtained his blessing through trickery and a disguised identity, Jesus Christ, the true and perfect heir, did not need to deceive to receive His inheritance or to bestow ours. He is the authentic "savoury meat" to the Father, the perfect sacrifice whose obedience and self-offering truly please God (Ephesians 5:2). He is the ultimate fulfillment of the Abrahamic covenant, securing eternal blessings for all who believe, not through human stratagem or disguised identity, but through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection (Galatians 3:13-14). The spiritual blessing we receive in Christ is freely given, unmerited, and secured by divine faithfulness, offering a superior and untainted inheritance that far surpasses any earthly patriarchal blessing (Ephesians 1:3).

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 27 verses 6–17

Rebekah is here contriving to procure for Jacob the blessing which was designed for Esau; and here,

I. The end was good, for she was directed in this intention by the oracle of God, by which she had been governed in dispensing her affections. God had said it should be so, that the elder should serve the younger; and therefore Rebekah resolves it shall be so, and cannot bear to see her husband designing to thwart the oracle of God. But,

II. The means were bad, and no way justifiable. If it was not a wrong to Esau to deprive him of the blessing (he himself having forfeited it by selling the birthright), yet it was a wrong to Isaac, taking advantage of his infirmity, to impose upon him; it was a wrong to Jacob too, whom she taught to deceive, by putting a lie into his mouth, or at least by putting one into his right hand. It would likewise expose him to endless scruples about the blessing, if he should obtain it thus fraudulently, whether it would stand him or his in any stead, especially if his father should revoke it, upon the discovery of the cheat, and plead, as he might, that it was nulled by an error personae - a mistake of the person. He himself also was aware of the danger, lest (Gen 27:12), if he should miss of the blessing, as he might probably have done, he should bring upon himself his father's curse, which he dreaded above any thing; besides, he laid himself open to that divine curse which is pronounced upon him that causeth the blind to wander out of the way, Deu 27:18. If Rebekah, when she heard Isaac promise the blessing to Esau, had gone, at his return from hunting, to Isaac, and, with humility and seriousness, put him in remembrance of that which God had said concerning their sons, - if she further had shown him how Esau had forfeited the blessing both by selling his birthright and by marrying strange wives, it is probable that Isaac would have been prevailed upon knowingly and wittingly to confer the blessing upon Jacob, and needed not thus to have been cheated into it. This would have been honourable and laudable, and would have looked well in the history; but God left her to herself, to take this indirect course, that he might have the glory of bringing good out of evil, and of serving his own purposes by the sins and follies of men, and that we might have the satisfaction of knowing that, though there is so much wickedness and deceit in the world, God governs it according to his will, to his own praise. See Job 12:16, With him are strength and wisdom, the deceived and the deceiver are his. Isaac had lost the sense of seeing, which, in this case, could not have been imposed upon, Providence having so admirably well ordered the difference of features that no two faces are exactly alike: conversation and commerce could scarcely be maintained if there were not such a variety. Therefore she endeavours to deceive, 1. His sense of tasting, by dressing some choice pieces of kid, seasoning them, serving them up, so as to make him believe they were venison: this it was no hard matter to do. See the folly of those that are nice and curious in their appetite, and take a pride in humouring it. It is easy to impose upon them with that which they pretend to despise and dislike, so little perhaps does it differ from that to which they give a decided preference. Solomon tells us that dainties are deceitful meat; for it is possible for us to be deceived by them in more ways than one, Pro 23:32. 2. His sense of feeling and smelling. She put Esau's clothes upon Jacob, his best clothes, which, it might be supposed, Esau would put on, in token of joy and respect to his father, when he was to receive the blessing. Isaac knew these, by the stuff, shape, and smell, to be Esau's. If we would obtain a blessing from our heavenly Father, we must come for it in the garments of our elder brother, clothed with his righteousness, who is the first-born among many brethren. Lest the smoothness and softness of Jacob's hands and neck should betray him, she covered them, and probably part of his face, with the skins of the kids that were newly killed, Gen 27:16. Esau was rough indeed when nothing less than these would serve to make Jacob like him. Those that affect to seem rough and rugged in their carriage put the beast upon the man, and really shame themselves, by thus disguising themselves. And, lastly, it was a very rash word which Rebekah spoke, when Jacob objected the danger of a curse: Upon me be thy curse, my son, Gen 27:13. Christ indeed, who is mighty to save, because mighty to bear, has said, Upon me be the curse, only obey my voice; he has borne the burden of the curse, the curse of the law, for all those that will take upon them the yoke of the command, the command of the gospel. But it is too daring for any creature to say, Upon me be the curse, unless it be that curse causeless which we are sure shall not come, Pro 26:2.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–17. Public domain.
Copy as
Hippolytus of RomeAD 235
ON THE BLESSINGS OF ISAAC AND JACOB 4
On the one hand, Rebekah, who bears the image of the church, already prefigures the future events that would be accomplished through her younger son. She says to him, “Go to the pasture of the sheep, and fetch me from there two small, tender and beautiful young goats.” Esau is sent to the plain as if he lived abroad in the world; but Jacob is sent [to the pasture] of the sheep, in order that the words of the Lord, “I have been sent only to the lost sheep of Israel,” might come true.On the other hand, by saying, “Fetch me from there two small, tender and beautiful young goats,” she signified the two calls that appear to have been addressed by the Gospel. In fact, even though we are originally goats, because we are all sinners, through obedience we become tender and beautiful, justified by faith in Christ. No more [are we] like condemned goats but like sheep in pure sacrifice, in “sweet savor,” offered to God and made nourishment for the Word, who gives similes their full accomplishment by saying to his disciples, “I have food to eat that you do not know.”
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 27:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.