Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And Jacob said, Sell me this day thy birthright.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And Jacob H3290 said H559, Sell H4376 me this day H3117 thy birthright H1062.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Ya'akov answered, "First sell me your rights as the firstborn."
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“First sell me your birthright,” Jacob replied.
Ask
American Standard Version
And Jacob said, Sell me first thy birthright.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Jacob said, “First, sell me your birthright.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And Iaakob sayd, Sell me euen nowe thy birthright.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and Jacob saith, `Sell to-day thy birthright to me.'
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
All Genesis Sites (Canaan)
All Genesis Sites (Canaan) View full PDF
All Genesis Sites (Middle East)
All Genesis Sites (Middle East) View full PDF
Genesis 25:19-33
Genesis 25:19-33 View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 690 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Genesis 25:31 records the pivotal moment when Jacob, with calculated opportunism, demanded that his famished twin brother Esau sell him his birthright. This concise yet profound exchange, occurring as Esau returned exhausted from hunting, sets the stage for a dramatic shift in the patriarchal lineage, revealing the contrasting values and characters of the two brothers and foreshadowing the fulfillment of God's sovereign plan.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is deeply embedded within the broader narrative of Genesis 25, which introduces the contrasting personalities and destinies of Isaac's twin sons, Jacob and Esau. The chapter begins with the death of Abraham and then swiftly transitions to the miraculous birth of the twins, preceded by God's prophetic declaration to Rebekah that "two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger" Genesis 25:23. The immediate preceding verses establish Esau as a skilled hunter and "a man of the field," while Jacob is described as "a plain man, dwelling in tents" Genesis 25:27. The scene leading directly to this verse, Genesis 25:29-30, depicts Jacob preparing a stew and Esau returning from the hunt, faint with hunger, desperately pleading, "Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint." Jacob's demand for the birthright is thus a direct, calculated response to his brother's extreme vulnerability and immediate physical need.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: In ancient Near Eastern patriarchal societies, the birthright (Hebrew: bekorah) was an immensely significant institution. It conferred upon the firstborn son a privileged status, including a double portion of the father's inheritance (Deuteronomy 21:17), leadership of the family or clan upon the father's death, and often the spiritual headship, including the role of priest. For the descendants of Abraham, the birthright carried an even weightier significance: it was the conduit through which the covenant promises of God—land, numerous descendants, and blessing to all nations—would be passed down. The transaction in Genesis 25:31 would have been understood by contemporary audiences as an extraordinary and legally binding act, despite its seemingly casual nature, especially once confirmed by an oath, as seen in Genesis 25:33.
  • Key Themes: This pivotal verse contributes significantly to several overarching themes within Genesis and the broader biblical narrative. It highlights the theme of Divine Sovereignty and Human Agency, demonstrating how God's predetermined plan ("the elder shall serve the younger" Genesis 25:23) can be realized through human actions, even those driven by flawed motives. The stark Contrast of Characters between Jacob and Esau is vividly portrayed: Jacob, the calculating and ambitious schemer who values long-term spiritual inheritance, versus Esau, the impulsive and materialistic individual who prioritizes immediate gratification. Furthermore, the narrative underscores the theme of Valuing Spiritual Inheritance over Material Gain, serving as a powerful cautionary tale against despising God-given blessings for fleeting worldly comforts, a theme echoed later in the New Testament's condemnation of Esau as a "profane person" Hebrews 12:16.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • said (Hebrew, ʼâmar', H559): This primitive root verb signifies "to say," but with a broad range of application, encompassing to answer, appoint, bid, command, declare, demand, or utter speech. In this context, Jacob's "saying" is not a casual remark but a deliberate, direct, and forceful proposition, a demand that sets the terms of a binding agreement. It underscores his intentionality and determination to acquire the birthright.
  • Sell (Hebrew, mâkar', H4376): A primitive root meaning "to sell," literally (as merchandise, a daughter in marriage, into slavery) or figuratively (to surrender). Here, it denotes a commercial transaction, a transfer of ownership for a price. Jacob's use of "sell" rather than "give" or "trade" emphasizes the finality and legality he seeks for this exchange, transforming a familial privilege into a negotiable commodity.
  • birthright (Hebrew, bᵉkôwrâh', H1062): From the feminine of bᵉkôwr (firstborn), this term refers to the firstling of man or beast, or abstractly, primogeniture. It encompasses the rights and privileges of the firstborn son, including a double portion of inheritance, family leadership, and, critically in this lineage, the spiritual blessing and covenant promises of God. Jacob's demand for the bekorah reveals his deep understanding and coveting of its profound spiritual and ancestral significance, in stark contrast to Esau's immediate disregard for it.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And Jacob said": This opening phrase immediately places Jacob as the initiator of the interaction, highlighting his proactive and assertive nature. It sets the stage for his calculated proposition, revealing his shrewdness and his readiness to exploit a moment of weakness.
  • "Sell me this day": Jacob's demand is direct and urgent. The phrase "this day" emphasizes the immediacy of his proposition, allowing Esau no time for reflection, consultation, or a change of heart. It underscores Jacob's opportunistic timing and his desire to finalize the transaction without delay, ensuring Esau's desperate hunger dictates his decision.
  • "thy birthright": This is the object of Jacob's desire, the most significant inheritance of the firstborn son. By demanding the "birthright," Jacob is not merely seeking material gain but the profound spiritual and social privileges associated with primogeniture, including the covenant blessing of Abraham. This phrase reveals the true prize Jacob seeks, a prize Esau, in his famished state, tragically undervalues.

Literary Devices

The verse employs several powerful literary devices. Irony is prominent, as the younger brother, Jacob, shrewdly seeks to acquire the birthright from the elder, Esau, who is entitled to it by custom but despises its value. This ironic reversal of expectation foreshadows the divine prophecy that "the elder shall serve the younger" Genesis 25:23. Foreshadowing is also evident, as Jacob's cunning and opportunistic nature, revealed in this transaction, prefigures his later deception of Isaac to secure the blessing in Genesis 27. Furthermore, the stark Contrast between Jacob's long-term, spiritual ambition and Esau's short-sighted, carnal impulsiveness is a central theme introduced and highlighted by this exchange.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This singular verse encapsulates profound theological truths concerning divine sovereignty, human responsibility, and the nature of true value. While God had already declared His intention for the elder to serve the younger, Jacob's opportunistic action, though ethically questionable, becomes the human instrument through which this divine purpose begins to unfold. It highlights that God can use flawed human choices to advance His redemptive plan, without condoning the sin involved. The exchange serves as a powerful biblical illustration of the perennial human struggle between immediate gratification and eternal perspective, challenging believers to discern and prioritize what holds lasting spiritual significance over fleeting worldly desires.

  • Genesis 25:34 - Esau's subsequent actions and the narrator's commentary explicitly state that he "despised his birthright," reinforcing the thematic contrast.
  • Hebrews 12:16-17 - The New Testament explicitly condemns Esau as a "profane person" for selling his birthright for a single meal, warning against similar spiritual shortsightedness.
  • Romans 9:10-13 - Paul references the Jacob and Esau narrative to illustrate God's sovereign choice and election, emphasizing that God's purposes are not based on human works but on His call.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The narrative of Jacob's demand for Esau's birthright serves as a timeless mirror reflecting our own human tendencies and priorities. It compels us to honestly evaluate what we truly value: are we prone to Esau's shortsightedness, trading away long-term spiritual blessings for immediate, fleeting comforts or desires? This verse challenges us to cultivate a deep appreciation for our spiritual inheritance in Christ, recognizing its immeasurable worth above any earthly gain or temporary satisfaction. It calls us to exercise discernment in moments of temptation or weakness, guarding against impulsive decisions that could compromise our integrity, our walk with God, or our eternal destiny. Our choices, especially when faced with immediate needs or desires, reveal the true state of our hearts and can have profound, lasting consequences not only for ourselves but for generations to come.

Questions for Reflection

  • What "birthrights" or long-term spiritual blessings might I be tempted to trade for immediate gratification in my own life?
  • How can I cultivate a deeper appreciation for my spiritual inheritance in Christ, preventing me from despising it like Esau?
  • In what ways might I be tempted to act opportunistically or manipulate situations to my advantage, rather than trusting in God's timing and provision?

FAQ

What was the significance of the birthright in ancient Israelite society?

Answer: The birthright (Hebrew: bekorah) was a comprehensive set of privileges and responsibilities traditionally granted to the firstborn son in ancient patriarchal societies. It included a double portion of the father's inheritance, the spiritual and social leadership of the family or clan, and, in the context of Abraham's descendants, the continuation of the covenant promises God made to their patriarchs. It was a position of both material wealth and profound spiritual authority, signifying the heir through whom the family line and its associated blessings would continue.

Was Jacob's action in demanding the birthright ethical?

Answer: From a purely human ethical standpoint, Jacob's action was highly opportunistic and manipulative, exploiting his brother's desperate vulnerability. While his desire for the birthright may have stemmed from a greater appreciation for its spiritual significance than Esau's, his method was deceptive and lacked brotherly compassion. The Bible often records events without explicitly endorsing the ethical behavior of its characters, allowing the reader to discern the moral implications. Jacob's character development throughout Genesis shows God working with and through his flaws, ultimately transforming him.

Why did Esau agree to sell his birthright so easily?

Answer: Esau's willingness to sell his birthright for a single meal highlights his impulsive nature and his profound lack of appreciation for the long-term spiritual and material value of his inheritance. He prioritized immediate physical comfort over a sacred and lasting legacy. His statement, "Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?" Genesis 25:32, reveals a profound shortsightedness and a profane disregard for what was truly valuable. The New Testament later describes him as "a profane person" for this very act Hebrews 12:16.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

The narrative of Jacob and Esau's birthright exchange, particularly Esau's despising of his inheritance, finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment. Just as Esau traded an invaluable spiritual legacy for fleeting physical satisfaction, humanity, through sin, forfeited its true inheritance and relationship with God. Christ, however, is the ultimate "firstborn" Colossians 1:15, the true heir of all things, who did not grasp His divine prerogative but rather emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant and becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross Philippians 2:6-8. Unlike Esau, who despised his birthright, Christ valued His Father's will and our redemption above all, offering Himself as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world John 1:29. Through His sacrifice and resurrection, He secured for us an eternal, imperishable inheritance, restoring us to a position of co-heirs with Him Romans 8:17, ensuring that those who believe will never trade their spiritual birthright for the fleeting pleasures of this world, but will inherit eternal life John 3:16.

Copy as

Commentary on Genesis 25 verses 29–34

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here a bargain made between Jacob and Esau about the birthright, which was Esau's by providence but Jacob's by promise. It was a spiritual privilege, including the excellency of dignity and the excellency of power, as well as the double portion, Gen 49:3. It seemed to be such a birthright as had then the blessing annexed to it, and the entail of the promise. Now see,

I. Jacob's pious desire of the birthright, which yet he sought to obtain by indirect courses, not agreeable to his character as a plain man. It was not out of pride or ambition that he coveted the birthright, but with an eye to spiritual blessings, which he had got well acquainted with in his tents, while Esau had lost the scent of them in the field. For this he is to be commended, that he coveted earnestly the best gifts; yet in this he cannot be justified, that he took advantage of his brother's necessity to make him a very hard bargain (Gen 25:31): Sell me this day thy birthright. Probably there had formerly been some communication between them about this matter, and then it was not so great a surprise upon Esau as here it seems to be; and, it may be, Esau had sometimes spoken slightly of the birthright and its appurtenances, which encouraged Jacob to make this proposal to him. And, if so, Jacob is, in some measure, excusable in what he did to gain his point. Note, Plain men that have their conversation in simplicity and godly sincerity, and without worldly wisdom, are often found wisest of all for their souls and eternity. Those are wise indeed that are wise for another world. Jacob's wisdom appeared in two things: - 1. He chose the fittest time, took the opportunity when it offered itself, and did not let it slip. 2. Having made the bargain, he made it sure, and got it confirmed by Esau's oath: Swear to me this day, Gen 25:33. He took Esau when he was in the mind, and would not leave him a power of revocation. In a case of this nature, it is good to be sure.

II. Esau's profane contempt of the birthright, and the foolish sale he made of it. He is called profane Esau for it (Heb 12:16), because for one morsel of meat he sold his birthright, as dear a morsel as ever was eaten since the forbidden fruit; and he lived to regret it when it was too late. Never was there such a foolish bargain as this which Esau now made; and yet he valued himself upon his policy, and had the reputation of a cunning man, and perhaps had often bantered his brother Jacob as a weak and simple man. Note, There are those that are penny-wise and pound-foolish, cunning hunters that can out-wit others and draw them into their snares, and yet are themselves imposed upon by Satan's wiles and led captive by him at his will. Again, God often chooses the foolish things of the world, by them to confound the wise. Plain Jacob makes a fool of cunning Esau. Observe the instances of Esau's folly.

1.His appetite was very strong, Gen 25:29, Gen 25:30. Poor Jacob had got some bread and pottage (Gen 25:29) for his dinner, and was sitting down to it contentedly enough, without venison, when Esau came from hunting, hungry and weary, and perhaps had caught nothing. And now Jacob's pottage pleased his eye better than ever his game had done. Give me (says he) some of that red, that red, as it is in the original; it suited his own colour (Gen 25:25), and, in reproach to him for this, he was ever afterwards called Edom, red. Nay, it should seem, he was so faint that he could not feed himself, nor had he a servant at hand to help him, but entreats his brother to feed him. Note, (1.) Those that addict themselves to sport weary themselves for very vanity, Hab 2:13. They might do the most needful business, and gain the greatest advantages, with half the pains they take, and half the perils they run into, in pursuit of their foolish pleasures. (2.) Those that work with quietness are more constantly and comfortably provided for than those that hunt with noise: bread is not always to the wise, but those that trust in the Lord and do good verily they shall be fed, fed with daily bread; not as Esau, sometimes feasting and sometimes fainting. (3.) The gratifying of the sensual appetite is that which ruins thousands of precious souls: surely, if Esau was hungry and faint, he might have got a meal's meat cheaper than at the expense of his birthright; but he was unaccountably fond of the colour of this pottage, and could not deny himself the satisfaction of a mess of it, whatever it cost him. Never better can come of it, when men's hearts walk after their eyes (Job 31:7), and when they serve their own bellies: therefore look not thou upon the wine, or, as Esau, upon the pottage, when it is red, when it gives that colour in the cup, in the dish, which is most inviting, Pro 23:31. If we use ourselves to deny ourselves, we break the forces of most temptations.

2.His reasoning was very weak (Gen 25:32): Behold, I am at the point to die; and, if he were, would nothing serve to keep him alive but this pottage? If the famine were now in the land (Gen 26:1), as Dr. Lightfoot conjectures, we cannot suppose Isaac so poor, or Rebekah so bad a house-keeper, but that he might have been supplied with food convenient, other ways, and might have saved his birthright: but his appetite has the mastery of him; he is in a longing condition, nothing will please him but this red this red pottage, and, to palliate his desire, he pretends he is at the point to die. If it had been so, was it not better for him to die in honour than to live in disgrace, to die under a blessing than to live under a curse? The birthright was typical of spiritual privileges, those of the church of the first-born. Esau was now tried how he would value them, and he shows himself sensible only of present grievances; may he but get relief against them, he cares not for his birthright. Better principled was Naboth, who would lose his life rather than sell his vineyard, because his part in the earthly Canaan signified is part in the heavenly, Kg1 21:3. (1.) If we look on Esau's birthright as only a temporal advantage, what he said had something of truth in it, namely, that our worldly enjoyments, even those we are most fond of, will stand us in no stead in a dying hour (Psa 49:6-8); they will not put by the stroke of death, nor ease the pangs nor remove the sting: yet Esau, who set up for a gentleman, should have had a greater and more noble spirit than to sell even such an honour so cheaply. (2.) But, being of a spiritual nature, his undervaluing it was the greatest profaneness imaginable. Note, It is egregious folly to part with our interest in God, and Christ, and heaven, for the riches, honours, and pleasures, of this world, as bad a bargain as his that sold a birthright for a dish of broth.

3.Repentance was hidden from his eyes (Gen 25:34): He did eat and drink, pleased his palate, satisfied his cravings, congratulated himself on the good meal's meat he had had, and then carelessly rose up and went his way, without any serious reflections upon the bad bargain he had made, or any show of regret. Thus Esau despised his birthright; he used no means at all to get the bargain revoked, made no appeal to his father about it, nor proposed to his brother to compound the matter; but the bargain which his necessity had made (supposing it were so) his profaneness confirmed ex post facto - after the deed; and by his subsequent neglect and contempt he did, as it were, acknowledge a fine, and by justifying himself in what he had done he put the bargain past recall. Note, People are ruined, not so much by doing what is amiss, as by doing it and not repenting of it, doing it and standing to it.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 29–34. Public domain.
Copy as
Basil of CaesareaAD 379
ON RENUNCIATION OF THE WORLD
This vice of gluttony delivered Adam up to death; by the pleasure of the appetite consummate evil was brought into the world. Through it Noah was mocked, Canaan was cursed, Esau was deprived of his birthright and married into a Canaanite family. Lot became his own son-in-law and father-in-law, by marrying his own daughter.
Ambrose of MilanAD 397
On Jacob and the Blessed Life, Book 1, Chapter 2
Reason would then curtail the attractions of gluttony and the other excessive desires and would check the passions and emotions of the body. Therefore temperance comes before correction and is the mistress of learning. Proceeding from it, holy Jacob received from his brother the primacy that he had not possessed; by his agreement to that preference, Esau taught for the future that those who do not govern their own selves are worthless in judgment.
Augustine of HippoAD 430
SERMON 4.12
I have already put it to your holinesses yesterday that the reason why the elder son is called Esau is that no one becomes spiritual without first having been "of the flesh" or materialistic. But if they persist in "the mind of the flesh," they will always be Esau. If, however, they become spiritual, they will then be the younger son. But then the junior will be the senior; the other takes precedence in time, this one in virtue. Before it ever came to this blessing, Esau had longed to have the lentils Jacob had cooked. And Jacob said to him, "Give me your birthright, and I will give you the lentils I have cooked." He sold his right as firstborn to his younger brother. He went off with a temporary satisfaction; the other went off with a permanent honor. So those in the church who are slaves to temporary pleasures and satisfactions eat lentils—lentils that Jacob certainly cooked but that Jacob did not eat. Idols, you see, flourished more than anywhere else in Egypt; lentils are the food of Egypt; so lentils represent all the errors of the Gentiles. So because the more obvious and manifest church which was going to come from the Gentiles was signified in the younger son, Jacob is said to have cooked the lentils and Esau to have eaten them.…Now apply this. You have a Christian people. But among this Christian people it is the ones who belong to Jacob that have the birthright or right of the firstborn. Those, however, who are materialistic in life, materialistic in faith, materialistic in hope, materialistic in love, still belong to the old covenant, not yet to the new. They still share the lot of Esau, not yet in the blessing of Jacob.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Genesis 25:31 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.