Skip to content

Commentary

Genesis 26:22 · 4 passages

And he removed from thence, and digged another well; and for that they strove not: and he called the name of it Rehoboth; and he said, For now the LORD hath made room for us, and we shall be fruitful in the land.

After these things, then, Isaac dug a third well and “called the name of that place ‘Room-Enough,’ saying, ‘Now the Lord has given us room and has increased us on the earth.’ ” For truly now Isaac is given room and his name is increased on all the earth since he has fulfilled for us the knowledge of the Trinity. For then “God was known” only “in Judea” and his name was named in Israel, but now “their sound has gone forth into all the earth and their words into the ends of the world.” For the servants of Isaac going throughout the whole world have dug wells and have shown “the living water” to all, “baptizing all the nations in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” For “the earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof.”
So therefore the wells that Abraham dug, that is, the Scriptures of the Old Testament, have been filled with earth by the Philistines, or evil teachers, scribes and Pharisees, or even hostile powers; and their veins have been stopped up lest they provide a drink for these who are of Abraham. For that people cannot drink from the Scriptures but suffer a “thirst for the word of God” until Isaac should come and open them that his servants may drink. Thanks therefore to Christ, the son of Abraham—of whom it is written, “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham”57—who has come and opened the wells for us. For he opened them for those men who said, “Was not our heart burning in us when he opened to us the Scriptures?” He opened therefore these wells and “called them,” the text says, “as his father Abraham had called them.” For he did not change the names of the wells.And it is astonishing that Moses is called Moses even among us, and each of the prophets is addressed by his own name. For Christ did not change the names in the Scriptures but the under…
So therefore the wells that Abraham dug, that is, the Scriptures of the Old Testament, have been filled with earth by the Philistines, or evil teachers, scribes and Pharisees, or even hostile powers; and their veins have been stopped up lest they provide a drink for these who are of Abraham. For that people cannot drink from the Scriptures but suffer a “thirst for the word of God” until Isaac should come and open them that his servants may drink. Thanks therefore to Christ, the son of Abraham—of whom it is written, “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham”57—who has come and opened the wells for us. For he opened them for those men who said, “Was not our heart burning in us when he opened to us the Scriptures?” He opened therefore these wells and “called them,” the text says, “as his father Abraham had called them.” For he did not change the names of the wells.And it is astonishing that Moses is called Moses even among us, and each of the prophets is addressed by his own name. For Christ did not change the names in the Scriptures but the understanding. And he changes it there that now later we might not pay attention “to Jewish fables” and “endless genealogies,” because “they turn their hearing away from the truth indeed but are turned to fables.”
Christ opened therefore the wells and taught us, that we might not seek God in some one place but might know that “sacrifice is offered to his name in every land.” For it is now that time “when the true worshipers worship the Father” neither in Jerusalem nor on Mt. Gerazim “but in spirit and truth.” God therefore dwells neither in a place nor in a land, but he dwells in the heart. And if you are seeking the place of God, a pure heart is his place. For he says that he will dwell in this place when he says through the prophet, “I will dwell in them and walk in them; and they shall be my people, and I will be their God,” says the Lord.
But also each of us who serves the Word of God digs wells and seeks “living water,” from which he may renew his hearers. If, therefore, I too shall begin to discuss the words of the ancients and to seek in them a spiritual meaning, if I shall have attempted to remove the veil of the law and to show that the things which have been written are “allegorical,” I am indeed digging wells. But immediately the friends of the letter will stir up malicious charges against me and will lie in ambush for me. They will contrive immediately hostilities and persecutions, denying that the truth can stand except upon earth.But if we are servants of Isaac, let us love “wells of living water” and springs. Let us withdraw from those who are contentious and contrive malicious charges and leave them in the earth, which they love. But let us never cease digging “wells of living water.” And by discussing now indeed things that are old and again things that are new, let us become like that scribe in the Gospel, of whom the Lord said, “He brings forth from his treasures new things and old.”
Consider therefore that perhaps even in the soul of each of us there is “a well of living water,” there is a kind of heavenly perception and latent image of God, and the Philistines, that is, hostile powers, have filled this well with earth. With what kind of earth? With carnal perceptions and earthly thoughts, and for that reason “we have borne the image of the earthly.” At that time, therefore, when we were bearing “the image of the earthly,” the Philistines filled our wells. But now, since our Isaac has come, let us receive his advent and dig our wells. Let us cast the earth from them. Let us purge them from all filth and from all muddy and earthly thoughts, and let us discover in them that “living water” that the Lord mentions: “He who believes in me, from within him shall flow rivers of living water.” Behold how great the Lord’s liberality is: the Philistines filled our wells and hindered our small and trifling veins of water, and in place of these, springs and rivers are restored to us.If therefore you also hearing these words today should faithfully perceive what is said, Isaa…
Consider therefore that perhaps even in the soul of each of us there is “a well of living water,” there is a kind of heavenly perception and latent image of God, and the Philistines, that is, hostile powers, have filled this well with earth. With what kind of earth? With carnal perceptions and earthly thoughts, and for that reason “we have borne the image of the earthly.” At that time, therefore, when we were bearing “the image of the earthly,” the Philistines filled our wells. But now, since our Isaac has come, let us receive his advent and dig our wells. Let us cast the earth from them. Let us purge them from all filth and from all muddy and earthly thoughts, and let us discover in them that “living water” that the Lord mentions: “He who believes in me, from within him shall flow rivers of living water.” Behold how great the Lord’s liberality is: the Philistines filled our wells and hindered our small and trifling veins of water, and in place of these, springs and rivers are restored to us.If therefore you also hearing these words today should faithfully perceive what is said, Isaac would work also in you; he would cleanse your hearts from earthly perceptions. And seeing these mysteries that are so great to be lying hidden in the divine Scriptures, you progress in understanding, you progress in spiritual perceptions. You yourselves will also begin to be teachers, and “rivers of living water” will proceed from you. For the Word of God is present, and this now is his work, that he might remove the earth from the soul of each of you and open your spring. For he is within you and does not come from without, just as “also the kingdom of God is within you.”
Genesis 26:24 · 2 passages

And the LORD appeared unto him the same night, and said, I am the God of Abraham thy father: fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless thee, and multiply thy seed for my servant Abraham's sake.

As therefore the Lord himself accommodates his form in correspondence to the place and time and certain individual conditions, so also the saints, who prefigured him, should be believed to have represented types of mysteries in correspondence to places and times and conditions. [This] also we see now to be the case in Isaac, of whom we have heard it read, “He went up,” the text says, “from there to the well of the oath, and the Lord appeared to him that night and said, I am the God of Abraham your father; fear not. For I am with you, and I will bless you and multiply your seed because of Abraham your father.”The apostle Paul set forth two figures of this Isaac to us. One, about which he said that Ishmael indeed, the son of Hagar, represented the people according to the flesh, but Isaac the people who are of faith. The other, about which he said, “He did not say, and to his seeds, as of many, but to his seed, as of one, which is Christ.” Isaac therefore represents the people and Christ. Now it is certain that Christ is spoken of as the Word of God not only in the Gospels but also in t…
As therefore the Lord himself accommodates his form in correspondence to the place and time and certain individual conditions, so also the saints, who prefigured him, should be believed to have represented types of mysteries in correspondence to places and times and conditions. [This] also we see now to be the case in Isaac, of whom we have heard it read, “He went up,” the text says, “from there to the well of the oath, and the Lord appeared to him that night and said, I am the God of Abraham your father; fear not. For I am with you, and I will bless you and multiply your seed because of Abraham your father.”The apostle Paul set forth two figures of this Isaac to us. One, about which he said that Ishmael indeed, the son of Hagar, represented the people according to the flesh, but Isaac the people who are of faith. The other, about which he said, “He did not say, and to his seeds, as of many, but to his seed, as of one, which is Christ.” Isaac therefore represents the people and Christ. Now it is certain that Christ is spoken of as the Word of God not only in the Gospels but also in the law and prophets. But in the law he teaches beginners; in the Gospels he teaches the perfect. And Isaac therefore represents now the Word that is in the law or the prophets.
We have also already said previously that the embellishment of the temple and of those divine services which were performed therein was an ascent of the law. The increase of the prophets also can be called an ascent of the law. And for this reason perhaps Isaac is said to have gone up to the well of the oath and there the Lord is said to have appeared to him. For through the prophets “the Lord has sworn and he will not repent, that he is a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.” God appeared to him, therefore, “at the well of the oath” confirming the fulfillment of the promises made to him.
Genesis 26:25

And he builded an altar there, and called upon the name of the LORD, and pitched his tent there: and there Isaac's servants digged a well.

Isaac builds indeed an altar even now in the law and pitches his tent, but in the Gospels he does not pitch a tent but builds a house and establishes a foundation. For hear Wisdom saying of the church: “Wisdom,” Scripture says, “has built herself a house and has set up seven columns.” Hear Paul also saying about this: “For no man can lay a foundation but that which is laid, which is Christ Jesus.”80Where, therefore, there is a tent, even if it should be pitched, it is doubtless to be folded up. But where there are foundations and a house is built “upon a rock,” that house is never destroyed, “for it has been founded on a rock.” Nevertheless Isaac digs a well there too, nor does he ever cease digging wells until “the fountain of living water” arises and “the stream of the river makes the city of God joyful.”
Genesis 26:26 · 2 passages

Then Abimelech went to him from Gerar, and Ahuzzath one of his friends, and Phichol the chief captain of his army.

This Abimelech, as I see it, does not always have peace with Isaac, but sometimes he disagrees, at other times he seeks peace. If you remember how, in what precedes, we said of Abimelech that he represents the learned and wise of the world who have comprehended many things even of the truth through the learning of philosophy, you can understand how he can be neither always in dissension nor always at peace with Isaac, who represents the Word of God in the law. For philosophy is neither opposed to everything in the law of God nor in harmony with everything.For many of the philosophers write that there is one God who has created all things. In this they agree with the law of God. Some also have added this, that God made and rules all things by his Word and it is the Word of God by which all things are directed. In this they write in harmony not only with the law but also with the Gospels. Indeed, almost the total philosophy that is called moral and natural holds the same views we do. But it disagrees with us when it says matter is coeternal with God. It disagrees when it denies that Go…
This Abimelech, as I see it, does not always have peace with Isaac, but sometimes he disagrees, at other times he seeks peace. If you remember how, in what precedes, we said of Abimelech that he represents the learned and wise of the world who have comprehended many things even of the truth through the learning of philosophy, you can understand how he can be neither always in dissension nor always at peace with Isaac, who represents the Word of God in the law. For philosophy is neither opposed to everything in the law of God nor in harmony with everything.For many of the philosophers write that there is one God who has created all things. In this they agree with the law of God. Some also have added this, that God made and rules all things by his Word and it is the Word of God by which all things are directed. In this they write in harmony not only with the law but also with the Gospels. Indeed, almost the total philosophy that is called moral and natural holds the same views we do. But it disagrees with us when it says matter is coeternal with God. It disagrees when it denies that God is concerned about mortal things but that his providence is confined beyond the spaces of the lunar sphere. They disagree with us when they appraise the lives of those being born by the courses of the stars. They disagree when they say this world is permanent and is to have no end. But there are also many other things in which they either disagree with us or are in harmony. And therefore in accordance with this figure, Abimelech is sometimes described as being at peace with Isaac and sometimes as disagreeing.
But also I do not think that this was of idle concern to the Holy Spirit, who writes these things, to relate that two others “came with Abimelech, that is, “Ahuzzath his kinsman and Phicol the leader of his army.”Now Ahuzzath means “containing” and Phicol “the mouth of all,” but Abimelech himself means “my father is king.” These three, in my opinion, figuratively represent all philosophy, which is divided into three parts among them: logic, physics, ethics, that is, rational, natural, moral. The rational is that which acknowledges God to be Father of all, that is, Abimelech. The natural is that which is fixed and contains all things, as depending on the forces of nature itself, which Ahuzzath, which means “containing,” professes to be. The moral is that which is in the mouth of all and pertains to all and is situated in the mouth of all because of the likeness of the common precepts. Phicol, which means “the mouth of all,” signifies this. All these therefore come to the law of God in the learning of instructions of this kind and say, “We certainly saw that the Lord is with you, and w…
But also I do not think that this was of idle concern to the Holy Spirit, who writes these things, to relate that two others “came with Abimelech, that is, “Ahuzzath his kinsman and Phicol the leader of his army.”Now Ahuzzath means “containing” and Phicol “the mouth of all,” but Abimelech himself means “my father is king.” These three, in my opinion, figuratively represent all philosophy, which is divided into three parts among them: logic, physics, ethics, that is, rational, natural, moral. The rational is that which acknowledges God to be Father of all, that is, Abimelech. The natural is that which is fixed and contains all things, as depending on the forces of nature itself, which Ahuzzath, which means “containing,” professes to be. The moral is that which is in the mouth of all and pertains to all and is situated in the mouth of all because of the likeness of the common precepts. Phicol, which means “the mouth of all,” signifies this.
All these therefore come to the law of God in the learning of instructions of this kind and say, “We certainly saw that the Lord is with you, and we said, ‘Let there be an oath between us and you and let us establish a covenant with you, lest you do evil with us, but as we have not cursed you, so also you are blessed by the Lord.’ ”
Those three, who seek peace from the Word of God and desire to anticipate his fellowship with a covenant, can indeed represent the magi who come from parts of the East learned in the books of their fathers and in the instruction of their ancestors and say, “We certainly saw” “the one born king,” “and we have seen that God is with him,” “and we have come to worship him.”6
But also if there is anyone who has been instructed in learning of this kind, seeing that “God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself” and who has admired the majesty of his works, let him say, “We certainly saw that the Lord is with you, and we said, ‘Let there be an oath between us.’ ” For approaching the law of God he says necessarily, “I have sworn and am determined that I shall keep your commandments.”
Genesis 26:30

And he made them a feast, and they did eat and drink.

For it is certain that he who serves the Word “is debtor to the wise and the unwise.” Because, therefore, he is producing a feast for the wise, for this reason it is said that “he made” not a small but “a great feast.”And you, if you should not still be “a little child” and in need of “milk” but should bring your “senses exercised” and should come more capable to an understanding of the Word of God after very much instruction has been set before you, there will also be “a great feast” for you. The "vegetables" of the weak will not be prepared for you as food, nor will you be nourished with milk with which “little children” are nourished, but the servant of the Word will make a “great feast” for you. He will speak to you the “wisdom” that is offered “among the perfect.” He will offer you the “wisdom of God hidden in a mystery, which none of the princes of this world knew.” He will reveal Christ to you in this respect, that in him “all the treasures of wisdom are hidden.”15 He makes you therefore “a great feast,” and he himself eats with you if he should not find you to be such that he…
For it is certain that he who serves the Word “is debtor to the wise and the unwise.” Because, therefore, he is producing a feast for the wise, for this reason it is said that “he made” not a small but “a great feast.”And you, if you should not still be “a little child” and in need of “milk” but should bring your “senses exercised” and should come more capable to an understanding of the Word of God after very much instruction has been set before you, there will also be “a great feast” for you. The "vegetables" of the weak will not be prepared for you as food, nor will you be nourished with milk with which “little children” are nourished, but the servant of the Word will make a “great feast” for you. He will speak to you the “wisdom” that is offered “among the perfect.” He will offer you the “wisdom of God hidden in a mystery, which none of the princes of this world knew.” He will reveal Christ to you in this respect, that in him “all the treasures of wisdom are hidden.”15
He makes you therefore “a great feast,” and he himself eats with you if he should not find you to be such that he should say to you, “I could not speak to you as to spiritual, but as to carnal, as to little ones in Christ.”
He says this to the Corinthians, to which he also adds, “For when there are contentions and dissensions among you, are you not carnal and walk in a human way?” Paul did not “make a great feast” for these, insofar that when he was with them and was in need, he was a burden to no one. Nor did he eat bread he did not pay for from anyone, but laboring night and day, his own hands served himself and all who were with him. The Corinthians therefore were so far from having a “great feast” that the preacher of the Word of God could have not even the least or a little feast with them.
But there is a great feast for those who know how to hear more perfectly, who bring their “senses” instructed and “exercised” for hearing the Word of God.
Genesis 45:25

And they went up out of Egypt, and came into the land of Canaan unto Jacob their father,

We should observe in reading the holy Scriptures how “to go up” and “to go down” are employed in each individual passage. For if we were to give diligent consideration, we would discover that almost never is anyone said to have gone down to a holy place, nor is anyone related to have gone up to a blameworthy place. These observations show that the divine Scripture was not composed, as it seems to most, in illiterate and uncultivated language but was adapted in accordance with the discipline of divine instruction. Nor is Scripture devoted so much to historical narratives as to things and ideas that are mystical.You will find it written, therefore, that those who are born of the seed of Abraham have gone down into Egypt and again that the sons of Israel have gone up out of Egypt. Indeed Scripture speaks thus also of Abraham himself: “But Abraham went up out of Egypt into the desert, he and his wife and all that was his, and Lot with him.”
Genesis 45:26 · 2 passages

And told him, saying, Joseph is yet alive, and he is governor over all the land of Egypt. And Jacob's heart fainted, for he believed them not.

But Jacob is excited not only about the fact that he has heard that “Joseph his son is living,” but also especially about that which has been announced to him that it is Joseph who holds “dominion over all Egypt.”For the fact that he has reduced Egypt to his rule is truly great to him. For to tread on lust, to flee luxury and to suppress and curb all the pleasures of the body, this is what it means to have “dominion over all Egypt.” And this is what is considered great and held in admiration by Israel.
But if there is someone who should subject at least some vices of the body but yield to others and be subject to them, it is not said correctly of him that he holds “dominion over the whole land of Egypt,” but, for example, he will appear to hold dominion over one, perhaps, or two or three cities. But Joseph, whom no bodily lust ruled, was prince and lord “of all Egypt.”
I do not understand these words to have been said in the usual sense. For if, for example, we should assume that he could have been overcome with lust and sinned with his master’s wife, I do not think that this would have been announced about him by the patriarchs to his father Jacob: “Your son Joseph is living.” For if he had done this, without doubt he would not be living. For “the soul that sins, the same shall die.”23But Susanna also teaches the same things when she says, “I am straitened on every side. For if I do this thing—that is, if I sin—it is death to me; and if I do not do it, I shall not escape your hands.” Notice, therefore, that she too understood that there is death in sin. But also the judgment revealed by God to the first man contains the same things when he says, “But on the day that you shall eat of it you shall die the death.” For as soon as he has transgressed the commandment, he is dead. For the soul that has sinned is dead, and the serpent, which said, “You shall not die the death,” is shown to have deceived him. And these words have been about that which was…
I do not understand these words to have been said in the usual sense. For if, for example, we should assume that he could have been overcome with lust and sinned with his master’s wife, I do not think that this would have been announced about him by the patriarchs to his father Jacob: “Your son Joseph is living.” For if he had done this, without doubt he would not be living. For “the soul that sins, the same shall die.”23But Susanna also teaches the same things when she says, “I am straitened on every side. For if I do this thing—that is, if I sin—it is death to me; and if I do not do it, I shall not escape your hands.” Notice, therefore, that she too understood that there is death in sin.
But also the judgment revealed by God to the first man contains the same things when he says, “But on the day that you shall eat of it you shall die the death.” For as soon as he has transgressed the commandment, he is dead. For the soul that has sinned is dead, and the serpent, which said, “You shall not die the death,” is shown to have deceived him.
And these words have been about that which was said by the sons of Israel to Jacob: “Your son Joseph is living.”
Genesis 45:27 · 2 passages

And they told him all the words of Joseph, which he had said unto them: and when he saw the wagons which Joseph had sent to carry him, the spirit of Jacob their father revived:

But not even this is to be neglected idly, that the text says not the soul, but the spirit as its better part, was revived or rekindled. For indeed the brightness of the light that was in him, even if it was not completely extinguished then when his sons showed him Joseph’s robe stained with the blood of a kid. He could be deceived by their lie, so that “he tore his garments and put sackcloth on his loins and mourned his son, nor did he wish at all to be consoled,” but said, “I go down to my son into the nether world, mourning.” Even if then, as we said, the light in him had not been completely extinguished, nevertheless it had been darkened in the greatest degree because he could be deceived, because he could tear his garments, because he could mourn by mistake, because he could call on death, because he desired to go down into the nether world, mourning. On account of these things, therefore, he now revives and “rekindles his spirit,” because it followed logically that hearing the truth would rekindle and restore the light that the deceit of a lie had obscured in him.
What Latin expresses by saying: “his spirit was revived,” is written in Greek anezōpyrēsen. This means not so much to revive as to rekindle, so to speak, and reignite. This expression is usually used when, perhaps in some material, the fire fails to the point that it appears to be extinguished; and if perhaps it is renewed when kindling has been added, it is said to have been rekindled. Or if the light of a lamp should reach the point that it is thought to have gone out, if perhaps it be revived when oil has been poured in; although the expression is less refined, the lamp is said to have been rekindled. One will speak similarly also of a torch or other lights of this kind.This expression seems to indicate something like this also in Jacob. As long as he was far from Joseph and received no information about his life, his spirit had failed in him, as it were, and the light which was in him had been darkened, as the kindling already failed. But when those who reported to him about Joseph’s life came, that is, those who said that “the life was the light of all people,” he rekindles his…
What Latin expresses by saying: “his spirit was revived,” is written in Greek anezōpyrēsen. This means not so much to revive as to rekindle, so to speak, and reignite. This expression is usually used when, perhaps in some material, the fire fails to the point that it appears to be extinguished; and if perhaps it is renewed when kindling has been added, it is said to have been rekindled. Or if the light of a lamp should reach the point that it is thought to have gone out, if perhaps it be revived when oil has been poured in; although the expression is less refined, the lamp is said to have been rekindled. One will speak similarly also of a torch or other lights of this kind.This expression seems to indicate something like this also in Jacob. As long as he was far from Joseph and received no information about his life, his spirit had failed in him, as it were, and the light which was in him had been darkened, as the kindling already failed. But when those who reported to him about Joseph’s life came, that is, those who said that “the life was the light of all people,” he rekindles his spirit in himself, and the brightness of the true light is renewed in him.
Genesis 45:28

And Israel said, It is enough; Joseph my son is yet alive: I will go and see him before I die.

But because occasionally the divine fire can be extinguished even in the saints and faithful, hear the apostle Paul warning these who were worthy to receive gifts of the Spirit and grace, and saying, “Do not extinguish the Spirit.” The Scripture says of Jacob, therefore, “And Jacob rekindled his spirit, and Israel said, ‘It is a great thing for me if my son Joseph is still living,’ ” as if he has experienced something like that which Paul warned against and has renewed himself through those words that had been spoken to him about Joseph’s life.But this also should be noticed, that he who “rekindled his spirit,” meaning, of course, that spirit which seemed almost extinguished, is said to be Jacob. But he who says, “It is a great thing for me if my son Joseph is living,” as if he understands and sees that the life which is in the spiritual Joseph is great, is no longer called Jacob but Israel, as it were, he who sees in his mind the true life which is Christ, the true God.
Genesis 46:3

And he said, I am God, the God of thy father: fear not to go down into Egypt; for I will there make of thee a great nation:

It appears fitting indeed after these things, to contemplate and look into what God says to Israel himself through the vision and how he sends him to Egypt strengthening and encouraging him as if he were setting out to some struggles. For he says, “Fear not to descend into Egypt.” This is to say, you shall contend “against principalities and powers and against the rulers of this world of this darkness”—which is figuratively called Egypt—fear not, be not afraid. But if also you wish to know the reason that you ought not fear, hear my promise: “For I will make a great nation of you there, and I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will recall you from there in the end.” He therefore with whom God shall go down into the struggles is not afraid “to go down into Egypt.” He is not afraid to approach the struggles of this world and the battles with resisting demons. For hear the apostle Paul saying, “I have labored more,” he says, “than all those, yet not I, but the grace of God with me.” But also when dissension had been stirred up against him in Jerusalem, and he performed a most brill…
It appears fitting indeed after these things, to contemplate and look into what God says to Israel himself through the vision and how he sends him to Egypt strengthening and encouraging him as if he were setting out to some struggles. For he says, “Fear not to descend into Egypt.” This is to say, you shall contend “against principalities and powers and against the rulers of this world of this darkness”—which is figuratively called Egypt—fear not, be not afraid. But if also you wish to know the reason that you ought not fear, hear my promise: “For I will make a great nation of you there, and I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will recall you from there in the end.” He therefore with whom God shall go down into the struggles is not afraid “to go down into Egypt.” He is not afraid to approach the struggles of this world and the battles with resisting demons. For hear the apostle Paul saying, “I have labored more,” he says, “than all those, yet not I, but the grace of God with me.” But also when dissension had been stirred up against him in Jerusalem, and he performed a most brilliant struggle for the word and preaching of the Lord, the Lord stood by him and said the same things that now are said to Israel. “Fear not, Paul,” Scripture says, “for as you have testified of me in Jerusalem, so must you bear witness also at Rome.”
Genesis 46:4 · 3 passages

I will go down with thee into Egypt; and I will also surely bring thee up again: and Joseph shall put his hand upon thine eyes.

But each of us also, in the same manner and in the same way, enters Egypt and struggles and, if he is worthy that God should always remain with him, he will make him “into a great nation.” For the number of virtues and the multitude of righteousness in which all the saints are said to be multiplied and to increase is a great nation.That which is said is also fulfilled in the saint: “I will recall you from there in the end.” For the end is considered to be the perfection of things and the consummation of virtues. Indeed, for this reason also another saint said, “Recall me not in the midst of my days.” And again the Scripture bestows testimony on the great patriarch Abraham since “Abraham died full of days.” This statement, therefore, “I will recall you from there in the end,” is as if he had said, Since “you have fought a good fight, you have kept the faith, you have finished the course,” I will now recall you from this world to the future blessing, to the perfection of eternal life, to “the crown of justice which the Lord will give in the end of the ages to all who love him.”
But I think a still greater mystery lies hidden in this passage. For this statement disturbs me: “I will make a great nation of you, and I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will recall you from there in the end.” Who is it who is made “into a great nation” in Egypt and is recalled “in the end”? To the extent that it pertains to that Jacob of whom one supposes it to be said, it will not appear true. For he was not recalled from Egypt “in the end,” since he died in Egypt. But it will be absurd if someone says Jacob was recalled by God in that his body was carried back. But if it is accepted, it will not be true that “God is not the God of the dead but of the living.” It is not proper, therefore, that these words be understood of a dead body but that they apply to the living and vigorous.Let us consider therefore whether there may be depicted in this statement a figure of the Lord who descends into this world and is made “into a great nation,” that is, the church of the Gentiles, and after all things were completed, returned to the Father. Or, whether it is a figure of “the first-…
But I think a still greater mystery lies hidden in this passage. For this statement disturbs me: “I will make a great nation of you, and I will go down with you into Egypt, and I will recall you from there in the end.” Who is it who is made “into a great nation” in Egypt and is recalled “in the end”? To the extent that it pertains to that Jacob of whom one supposes it to be said, it will not appear true. For he was not recalled from Egypt “in the end,” since he died in Egypt. But it will be absurd if someone says Jacob was recalled by God in that his body was carried back. But if it is accepted, it will not be true that “God is not the God of the dead but of the living.” It is not proper, therefore, that these words be understood of a dead body but that they apply to the living and vigorous.Let us consider therefore whether there may be depicted in this statement a figure of the Lord who descends into this world and is made “into a great nation,” that is, the church of the Gentiles, and after all things were completed, returned to the Father. Or, whether it is a figure of “the first-formed man” who descends to the struggles of this world after he was cast out of the delights of paradise. The struggle with the serpent was set before him when it is said, “You shall watch for his head, and he shall watch for your heel,” and again, when it is said to the woman, “I will put enmity between you and him, and between your seed and his seed.”
Nevertheless God does not desert those placed in this struggle but is always with them. He is pleased with Abel; he reproaches Cain; he is present with Enoch, when he is invoked. He commands Noah to construct an ark of salvation in the flood; he leads Abraham “from the house of his father” and “from his kinsmen"; he blesses Isaac and Jacob; he leads the sons of Israel out of Egypt. He writes the law of the letter through Moses. He completes what was lacking through the prophets. This is what it means to be with them in Egypt.
But regarding the statement “I will recall you from there in the end,” I think this means, as we said above, that at the end of the ages his only-begotten Son descended even into the nether regions for the salvation of the world and recalled “the first-formed man” from there. For what he said to the thief, “This day you shall be with me in paradise,” understand not to have been said to him alone but also to all the saints for whom he had descended into the nether regions. In this man, therefore, more truly than in Jacob the words “I will recall you from there in the end” will be fulfilled.
But let us see how also the statement after that should be understood: “And Joseph shall put his hands upon your eyes.” I think many mysteries indeed of secret understanding are hidden within the veil of this statement. It belongs to another time to approach and touch upon these mysteries. Now, meanwhile, it will not appear to be said without reason, since it has appeared also to some of our predecessors that a certain prophecy seemed to be designated in this statement. Since indeed that Jeroboam who made two golden calves that he might seduce the people to worship them was from the tribe of Joseph, by this he blinded and closed the eyes of Israel, as if his hands were placed on them, lest they see their impiety, of which it is said, “Because of the impiety of Jacob are all these things, and because of the sin of the house of Israel. But what is the impiety of Jacob? Is it not Samaria?”32But if someone perhaps asserts that those things that are said by God about a future form of piety ought not be turned to a censurable function, we will say that just as the true Joseph, our Lord and…
But let us see how also the statement after that should be understood: “And Joseph shall put his hands upon your eyes.” I think many mysteries indeed of secret understanding are hidden within the veil of this statement. It belongs to another time to approach and touch upon these mysteries. Now, meanwhile, it will not appear to be said without reason, since it has appeared also to some of our predecessors that a certain prophecy seemed to be designated in this statement. Since indeed that Jeroboam who made two golden calves that he might seduce the people to worship them was from the tribe of Joseph, by this he blinded and closed the eyes of Israel, as if his hands were placed on them, lest they see their impiety, of which it is said, “Because of the impiety of Jacob are all these things, and because of the sin of the house of Israel. But what is the impiety of Jacob? Is it not Samaria?”32But if someone perhaps asserts that those things that are said by God about a future form of piety ought not be turned to a censurable function, we will say that just as the true Joseph, our Lord and Savior, put his physical hand on the eyes of the blind man and restored his sight that he had lost, so also he put his spiritual hands on the eyes of the law, which had been blinded by the corporeal understanding of the scribes and Pharisees. He restored sight to them, that to these to whom the Lord has opened the Scriptures spiritual vision and understanding might appear in the law.
And would that the Lord Jesus might put “his hands on” our “eyes” too, that we too might begin to look not at those things “which are seen but at the things which are not seen.” And would that he might open for us those eyes which contemplate not present things but future, and might reveal to us the aspect of the heart by which God is seen in spirit, through the Lord Jesus Christ himself, to whom belongs “glory and power forever and ever. Amen.”

All writers