TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Ezra 10 verses 15–44
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:39 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Ezra 10:39 meticulously lists Shelemiah, Nathan, and Adaiah among the many individuals in post-exilic Judah who had taken foreign wives, a practice explicitly forbidden by divine law. This verse is a specific entry within a comprehensive register of men who publicly committed to a profound national reformation, agreeing to put away their non-Israelite spouses and children. This painful act of costly obedience was deemed essential for safeguarding the spiritual and ethnic purity of the returned covenant community, ensuring their distinct identity and fidelity to God's commands.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
Ezra 10:39, as part of a longer list of names, primarily employs Listing or Enumeration. This device serves to provide a meticulous and comprehensive record of the individuals involved in the intermarriage transgression and subsequent repentance. The repetitive "and X, and Y, and Z" structure, often referred to as Polysyndeton or a form of Anaphora when repeated at the beginning of clauses, creates a rhythmic, almost litany-like effect, underscoring the sheer number of men involved and the widespread nature of the problem. The act of explicitly naming each individual constitutes Emphasis by Naming, which highlights the personal accountability of each man and the public nature of their sin and subsequent compliance with the covenant. This detailed Historical Record validates the thoroughness of Ezra's reform efforts and the seriousness with which the community approached their spiritual purification, ensuring that the gravity of their actions was not understated.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The inclusion of specific names like Shelemiah, Nathan, and Adaiah in the biblical record of Ezra 10:39 serves as a powerful testament to the seriousness of sin, the necessity of personal and corporate repentance, and the costly nature of true obedience to God's covenant. It underscores that while sin can be widespread, its resolution requires individual accountability and painful choices. The meticulous detail of the list emphasizes the importance of purity and distinctiveness for the covenant community, demonstrating that God's people are called to be set apart, even when it demands radical separation from worldly entanglements that compromise their faith. This historical account provides a stark reminder that fidelity to God's commands is paramount for the spiritual health and preservation of His people, illustrating that true spiritual renewal often comes through difficult acts of obedience.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The account of Ezra 10, with its detailed listing of individuals like Shelemiah, Nathan, and Adaiah, presents a challenging yet vital lesson for believers today. It reminds us that genuine repentance often involves difficult and costly actions, requiring a willingness to forsake that which is contrary to God's will, even if it means personal pain or social discomfort. The commitment of these men, though undoubtedly agonizing, was an act of profound faith and obedience, prioritizing God's law and the spiritual integrity of the community over personal attachments. While the New Testament does not command ethnic separation, it does call believers to a spiritual separation from worldly values and practices that compromise faith and devotion to God. This narrative urges us to examine our own lives for areas where compromise with the world might be eroding our distinctiveness as God's people, prompting us to embrace costly obedience for the sake of spiritual purity and fidelity to Christ, recognizing that true discipleship often demands painful choices for the sake of greater spiritual good.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why are these specific names listed in the Bible?
Answer: The listing of specific names like Shelemiah, Nathan, and Adaiah in Ezra 10:39 serves multiple critical purposes. Firstly, it provides a meticulous and verifiable historical record of the national reform, emphasizing the thoroughness of the investigation and the widespread nature of the intermarriage problem. Secondly, it highlights individual accountability; while the sin was corporate, each man was personally identified and required to make a difficult decision. This public record served as a testament to the community's commitment to genuine repentance and adherence to God's law, demonstrating that the reform was not superficial but deeply personal and comprehensive, ensuring that the historical account was precise and verifiable.
Was it fair to make men put away their wives and children?
Answer: From a modern perspective, this action appears incredibly harsh and tragic, causing immense personal suffering. However, within the historical and theological context of the Old Testament, it was understood as a necessary, albeit drastic, measure to preserve the spiritual purity and distinct identity of the covenant community. The prohibition against intermarriage was a divine command designed to prevent the adoption of idolatry and the erosion of Israel's unique relationship with God, as seen in passages like Deuteronomy 7:3-4. At this critical post-exilic juncture, with the nation fragile and vulnerable to assimilation, the leaders believed the very survival of their spiritual heritage, and thus the lineage through which the Messiah would come, depended on this uncompromising act of obedience. It was a corporate act of repentance for a corporate sin, undertaken to safeguard the nation's future fidelity to God and prevent a recurrence of the apostasy that led to their exile.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The stringent measures taken in Ezra 10, including the painful separation from foreign wives and children, underscore the Old Testament's emphasis on purity and distinctiveness for God's people. While these laws, such as the prohibition against intermarriage, served to preserve the physical lineage and spiritual integrity of Israel in anticipation of the Messiah, they ultimately pointed to a deeper, spiritual purity that only Christ could achieve. Jesus, the ultimate Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, fulfills the need for a holy people not by legalistic separation from physical relationships, but by cleansing humanity from the sin that truly defiles. Through His sacrifice, believers are made new creations in Christ Jesus, becoming a spiritual Israel, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, set apart for God not by ethnic lineage but by faith in Him. The call to separation for the New Testament believer is primarily spiritual—to be not unequally yoked with unbelievers in spiritual matters, and to live in purity by the power of the Holy Spirit, reflecting Christ's holiness in a fallen world and anticipating the ultimate restoration found in Him.