TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Ezra 10 verses 15–44
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:33 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Ezra 10:33 meticulously lists several men from the family of Hashum—Mattenai, Mattathah, Zabad, Eliphelet, Jeremai, Manasseh, and Shimei—who had taken foreign wives, a practice explicitly forbidden by God's covenant Law. This specific entry is part of a larger register documenting the widespread sin of intermarriage within the post-exilic Jewish community. It serves as a tangible record of the pervasive nature of this transgression and underscores the difficult but necessary corporate repentance and spiritual cleansing undertaken by the people under Ezra's resolute leadership to restore covenant fidelity and spiritual purity.
CONTEXT
Literary Context: Ezra 10:33 is situated within a comprehensive register of names (Ezra 10:18-43) that precisely documents the individuals who had violated God's command by intermarrying with foreign women. This list follows a profound scene of national repentance and confession in Ezra 9 and the community's solemn vow in Ezra 10:1-17 to rectify their disobedience. The preceding verses detail the assembly in Jerusalem, the heartfelt confession of sin, and the establishment of a formal, painstaking process to address the issue. The inclusion of specific names, such as those in Ezra 10:33, transforms a general decree into a concrete, personal act of accountability, demonstrating both the pervasive nature of the problem and the thoroughness of the community's response. It stands as a vital historical record validating the painful yet essential spiritual reformation that took place.
Historical & Cultural Context: The events of Ezra 10 unfold during the critical Second Temple period, following the initial return of Jewish exiles from Babylon to Judah, first under Zerubbabel and later under Ezra. The returned community was numerically small, politically vulnerable, and grappling with the immense task of re-establishing its distinct identity and worship in the ancestral land. Intermarriage with the surrounding peoples—specifically identified in Ezra 9:1 as Canaanites, Hittites, Perizzites, Jebusites, Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians, and Amorites—posed an existential threat to their distinctiveness as God's covenant people. Historically, such marriages had frequently led to religious syncretism, the adoption of pagan practices, and the erosion of their monotheistic faith, as tragically illustrated by past incidents like the Baal of Peor affair in Numbers 25. The drastic measure of putting away foreign wives and their children, though seemingly harsh by modern sensibilities, was perceived as an indispensable act to preserve the spiritual and ethnic purity of the remnant and prevent a recurrence of the idolatry that had culminated in the Babylonian exile.
Key Themes: The enumeration of individuals in Ezra 10:33, along with the broader list, powerfully illustrates several foundational themes central to the book of Ezra and the overarching post-exilic narrative. Foremost is the theme of Covenant Fidelity and Obedience. The people's willingness to undertake such a difficult and painful measure signifies a profound, renewed commitment to God's Law, particularly the explicit prohibitions against intermarriage found in passages like Deuteronomy 7:3-4 and Exodus 34:15-16. This act was a tangible and costly demonstration of their dedication to the covenant established at Sinai. Closely intertwined is the theme of Purity and Separation, emphasizing the imperative for Israel to remain distinct from the surrounding nations in order to fulfill its unique role as a holy nation set apart for God. Finally, the meticulous enumeration highlights Accountability and Corporate Repentance. Each name represents an individual's public acknowledgment of sin and active participation in a collective act of repentance, underscoring both personal responsibility and the communal effort required to restore righteousness and God's favor to the nation.
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The most prominent literary device employed in Ezra 10:33, and indeed throughout the extensive register in Ezra 10:18-43, is Enumeration (also known as listing or cataloging). This meticulous and exhaustive cataloging of names serves a crucial purpose beyond mere historical record-keeping. It powerfully emphasizes the Pervasiveness of the sin of intermarriage, demonstrating unequivocally that it was not an isolated or minor incident but a widespread issue deeply affecting numerous families and clans within the returned community. Furthermore, the very act of naming each individual underscores Accountability; these men were publicly identified, signifying their personal responsibility in the transgression and their public commitment to the painful but necessary act of repentance. This detailed list also lends significant Credibility and Authority to the historical account, showcasing the thoroughness and seriousness with which the reformation process was undertaken and validating the profound commitment of the community to address the breach of covenant. The inclusion of each name transforms an abstract problem into a concrete, human reality, making the repentance tangible and deeply personal for the community as a whole.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
Ezra 10:33, as an integral part of the larger list of those who had intermarried, speaks profoundly to the biblical emphasis on covenant fidelity, holiness, and the severe consequences of disobedience. The drastic measures undertaken, though undeniably difficult and painful, reflect a deep understanding of Israel's unique calling as God's chosen people, set apart to bear His name and serve as a witness to the nations. This act of separation was not merely ethnic but primarily theological, aimed at preserving the spiritual purity essential for their continued relationship with a holy God and preventing the idolatry that had historically plagued their ancestors. The meticulous naming of individuals highlights the principle that corporate sin is often the cumulative sum of individual transgressions, and true corporate repentance therefore requires individual accountability and decisive action. It underscores that genuine repentance is not merely sorrow for sin but a decisive, active turning away from it, even when it involves profound and painful sacrifices.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
The specific historical context of Ezra 10:33, dealing with the painful issue of intermarriage in post-exilic Israel, may seem far removed from contemporary life, yet the underlying principles of covenant faithfulness, spiritual purity, and radical obedience remain profoundly relevant for believers today. This passage challenges us to examine our own lives for areas where compromise with worldly values, cultural norms, or ungodly practices might be subtly eroding our wholehearted commitment to God. Just as the Israelites were called to make difficult, costly choices to preserve their distinct identity as God's covenant people, so too are believers called to guard their hearts and lives against influences that could lead to spiritual compromise, idolatry, or a drifting away from Christ. True repentance often involves painful separation from cherished things, relationships, or habits that hinder our walk with God. This narrative powerfully reminds us that genuine spiritual revival often begins with a sober, honest assessment of sin, a heartfelt confession, and decisive, courageous actions to align our lives with God's revealed will, thereby fostering a deeper, more authentic, and more vibrant relationship with Him.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Why is such a detailed list of names, including those in Ezra 10:33, included in the biblical text?
Answer: The inclusion of a detailed list of names, such as those found in Ezra 10:33, serves several crucial purposes within the biblical narrative. First, it provides a concrete and undeniable historical record, demonstrating the pervasive nature of the sin of intermarriage within the returned Jewish community. It shows that this was not an isolated incident but a widespread problem affecting various families and clans. Second, it powerfully highlights individual accountability; each named person publicly acknowledged their transgression and participated in the painful, yet necessary, act of repentance. This meticulous enumeration underscores the seriousness with which the community, under Ezra's leadership, addressed the breach of God's covenant. Finally, it validates the thoroughness and integrity of the spiritual reformation, showing that the community was committed to a complete cleansing to restore their relationship with God and prevent future idolatry.
Does the command to "put away foreign wives" still apply to believers today, particularly regarding interfaith marriage?
Answer: While the specific command in Ezra 10 to "put away foreign wives" was a unique and drastic measure for post-exilic Israel, intended to preserve their distinct covenant identity and prevent idolatry, its underlying principle of spiritual purity and avoiding spiritual compromise remains profoundly relevant. The New Testament does not command divorce for existing interfaith marriages but rather encourages believers to marry "in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 7:39) and issues a strong warning against being "unequally yoked with unbelievers" (2 Corinthians 6:14-18). The emphasis shifts from ethnic purity to spiritual unity and shared faith in Christ. The enduring lesson from Ezra is the seriousness of spiritual compromise and the imperative for believers to prioritize their devotion to God above all else, ensuring that their relationships draw them closer to Christ, rather than pulling them away.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
Ezra 10:33, with its painful record of separation undertaken to achieve purity and covenant fidelity, finds its ultimate and glorious fulfillment in the person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament covenant, with its rigid laws and the constant, often failed, struggle for Israel to maintain its holiness through external measures, pointed to a deeper, more radical transformation that external acts alone could never fully achieve. Jesus, the true Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, perfectly fulfilled the Law and offered Himself as the ultimate, once-for-all sacrifice, not merely to cleanse a nation from specific external impurities, but to purify the very hearts and consciences of all who believe from the pervasive sin that separates humanity from a holy God (Hebrews 9:14). Through His atoning work, believers are not simply separated from sin; they are made truly holy and eternally united to Christ, becoming part of a new covenant people, the Church, whose identity is found not in ethnic lineage or adherence to external legal codes, but in spiritual union with Him (Galatians 3:28). The painful "putting away" in Ezra foreshadows the joyful reality that in Christ, we are given a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 36:26), enabling us to live in true spiritual purity, empowered by the indwelling Holy Spirit, as a people uniquely set apart for God's glory and purpose (1 Peter 2:9-10).