TRV
See on the biblical-era map
Study This Verse
Commentary on Ezra 10 verses 15–44
The method of proceeding in this matter being concluded on, and the congregation dismissed, that each in his respective place might gain and give intelligence to facilitate the matter, we are here told, 1. Who were the persons that undertook to manage the matter and bring the causes regularly before the commissioners - Jonathan and Jahaziah, two active men, whether of the priests or of the people does not appear; probably they were the men that made that proposal (Ezr 10:13, Ezr 10:14) and were therefore the fittest to see it pursued; two honest Levites were joined with them, and helped them, Ezr 10:15. Dr. Lightfoot gives a contrary sense of this: only (or nevertheless) Jonathan and Jahaziah stood against this matter (which reading the original will very well bear), and these two Levites helped them in opposing it, either the thing itself or this method of proceeding. It was strange if a work of this kind was carried on and met with no opposition. 2. Who were the commissioners that sat upon this matter. Ezra was president, and with him certain chief men of the fathers who were qualified with wisdom and zeal above others for this service, Ezr 10:16. It was happy for them that they had such a man as Ezra to head them; they could not have done it well without his direction, yet he would not do it without their concurrence. 3. How long they were about it. They began the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter (Ezr 10:16), which was but ten days after this method was proposed (Ezr 10:9), and they finished in three months, Ezr 10:17. They sat closely and minded their business, otherwise they could not have despatched so many causes as they had before them in so little time; for we may suppose that all who were impeached were fairly asked what cause they could show why they should not be parted, and, if we may judge by other cases, provided the wife were proselyted to the Jewish religion she was not to be put away, the trial of which would require great care. 4. Who the persons were that were found guilty of this crime. Their names are here recorded to their perpetual reproach; many of the priests, nay, of the family of Jeshua, the high priest, were found guilty (Ezr 10:18), though the law had particularly provided, for the preserving of their honour in their marriages, that being holy themselves they should not marry such as were profane, Lev 21:7. Those that should have taught others the law broke it themselves and by their example emboldened others to do likewise. But, having lost their innocency in this matter, they did well to recant and give an example of repentance; for they promised under their hand to put away their strange wives (some think that they made oath to do so with their hands lifted up), and they took the appointed way of obtaining pardon, bringing the ram which was appointed by the law for a trespass offering (Lev 6:6), so owning their guilt and the desert of it, and humbly suing for forgiveness. About 113 in all are here named who had married strange wives, and some of them, it is said (Ezr 10:44), had children by them, which implies that not many of them had, God not crowning those marriages with the blessing of increase. Whether the children were turned off with the mothers, as Shechaniah proposed, does not appear; it should seem not: however it is probable that the wives which were put away were well provided for, according to their rank. One would think this grievance was now thoroughly redressed, yet we meet with it again (Neh 13:23 and Mal 2:11), for such corruptions are easily and insensibly brought in, but not without great difficulty purged out again. The best reformers can but do their endeavour, but, when the Redeemer himself shall come to Sion, he shall effectually turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
Continue studying Ezra 10:29 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
SUMMARY
Ezra 10:29 is a precise entry within the comprehensive register of post-exilic Jewish men who had entered into unlawful marriages with foreign women, a violation of God's covenant law. This verse specifically enumerates six individuals from the family of Bani—Meshullam, Malluch, Adaiah, Jashub, Sheal, and Ramoth—who publicly committed to the painful, yet necessary, act of separating from their foreign spouses and the children born of these unions. Their inclusion in this list serves as a tangible record of their personal participation in a national spiritual purification, aimed at restoring the purity and distinct covenant identity of the Israelite community in Jerusalem following their return from Babylonian exile.
CONTEXT
EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Key Word Analysis
Verse Breakdown
Literary Devices
The primary literary device employed in Ezra 10:29, and indeed throughout Ezra 10:18-44, is the List or Register. This is a common feature in ancient Near Eastern literature and biblical texts, serving to establish historical record, legitimacy, and accountability. In this context, the detailed list of names underscores the gravity of the situation and the thoroughness of the reform. The very act of naming each individual emphasizes their personal responsibility and the public nature of their repentance. Furthermore, the Repetition of similar lists across Ezra and Nehemiah (e.g., lists of returnees, builders, covenant signers) reinforces the theme of communal identity, shared responsibility, and the meticulousness with which the post-exilic community sought to restore order and covenant faithfulness. The names themselves, while not explicitly symbolic in the narrative, collectively Symbolize the painful but necessary process of spiritual purification and the radical obedience required to re-establish the holiness of God's people.
THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS
The specific act recorded in Ezra 10:29, while culturally and historically bound, resonates with profound theological principles applicable across the biblical narrative. It illustrates the severe consequences of covenant infidelity and the radical nature of true repentance. The community's willingness to undertake such a painful separation underscores the paramount importance of God's holiness and the necessity for His people to remain distinct from the defiling influences of the world. This was not merely a social reform, but a theological imperative to preserve the lineage and spiritual integrity of the people through whom God's redemptive plan would unfold. The actions of these men, though difficult, demonstrate a profound commitment to God's law over personal preference, a testament to the power of conviction and communal accountability in the face of widespread spiritual compromise.
REFLECTION AND APPLICATION
Ezra 10:29, though a list of names from a distant past, offers potent lessons for contemporary believers. The radical obedience demonstrated by these men, who made deeply personal and painful sacrifices for the sake of covenant purity, challenges us to examine the areas in our own lives where we might be compromising our faith. While the specific command to put away foreign wives is not directly applicable today, the underlying principle of spiritual separation from ungodly influences remains vital. True repentance often demands costly choices, requiring us to sever ties with anything that compromises our devotion to Christ or hinders our spiritual growth. This might involve re-evaluating relationships, media consumption, financial practices, or career paths. The narrative calls us to a commitment to holiness, recognizing that our identity as God's people requires a distinct way of living that reflects His character and values, rather than conforming to the patterns of the world. It reminds us that genuine faith is demonstrated not merely by profession, but by costly, obedient action.
Questions for Reflection
FAQ
Was the command to put away foreign wives about racial purity or religious purity?
Answer: The command was fundamentally about religious and covenantal purity, not racial purity. The Mosaic Law prohibited intermarriage with specific pagan nations (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:1-6) because their idolatrous practices and customs posed a direct threat to Israel's exclusive worship of Yahweh and their distinct identity as God's holy people. The concern was that these unions would lead the Israelites back into idolatry, as had happened repeatedly throughout their history, ultimately resulting in the exile. Ezra's reform was a desperate measure to preserve the theological integrity and future of the covenant community, ensuring they would not repeat the sins that led to their previous judgment. The focus was on spiritual fidelity and the preservation of the covenant, not on ethnic segregation.
Was it truly God's will for these men to divorce their wives and send away their children?
Answer: This is a complex and painful aspect of the narrative that requires careful theological consideration. While God generally permits divorce only in specific, limited circumstances (e.g., Deuteronomy 24:1-4) and expresses His hatred for it (Malachi 2:16), the situation in Ezra was unique and dire. The intermarriages were a direct and widespread violation of God's explicit covenant commands, threatening the very existence of the holy nation and the lineage through which the Messiah would come. The leaders and people understood this as a corporate sin requiring a drastic, painful, and immediate remedy to avert further divine judgment. It was seen as a necessary, albeit tragic, consequence of prior disobedience, prioritizing the survival of the covenant community and its spiritual purity above individual marital arrangements that were, from their inception, contrary to God's revealed will for His people. This action was an extreme measure to restore a broken covenant, emphasizing the gravity of their sin and the dire need for corporate repentance.
CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT
The painful but resolute actions of the men in Ezra 10:29, who put away their foreign wives for the sake of covenant purity, find their ultimate fulfillment and transformation in Christ. Their radical obedience, however costly, foreshadows the perfect and ultimate obedience of Jesus, who, without sin, perfectly fulfilled the Law and bore the full cost of humanity's covenant infidelity on the cross (Romans 5:19). The need for Israel to be set apart and purified from defiling influences points to the spiritual cleansing that Christ provides for all who believe, not through physical separation from specific people groups, but through the washing of regeneration and renewal by the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5). In Christ, the dividing wall of hostility is broken down, and a new spiritual Israel is formed, composed of all who are united to Him by faith, regardless of their earthly lineage or background (Ephesians 2:14-16). The "putting away" in Ezra, a temporary and specific measure for a particular covenant, is transcended by Christ's work, which brings true spiritual purity and reconciliation, establishing a new covenant where separation is from sin and the world's values, not from fellow human beings (2 Corinthians 5:17). He is the true temple, the true Israel, in whom all who are purified by His blood are united as one body, a holy dwelling place for God (Ephesians 2:19-22). The call to radical repentance and costly obedience in Ezra thus finds its ultimate expression in the call to discipleship, to take up one's cross and follow Christ, who alone offers true purity and eternal life (Luke 9:23).