Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Her priests H3548 have violated H2554 my law H8451, and have profaned H2490 mine holy things H6944: they have put no difference H914 between the holy H6944 and profane H2455, neither have they shewed H3045 difference between the unclean H2931 and the clean H2889, and have hid H5956 their eyes H5869 from my sabbaths H7676, and I am profaned H2490 among H8432 them.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Her cohanim have done violence to my Torah, profaned my holy things, made no difference between the holy and the common, not distinguished between unclean and clean, hidden their eyes from my shabbats, and profaned me among themselves.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Her priests do violence to My law and profane My holy things. They make no distinction between the holy and the common, and they fail to distinguish between the clean and the unclean. They disregard My Sabbaths, so that I am profaned among them.
Ask
American Standard Version
Her priests have done violence to my law, and have profaned my holy things: they have made no distinction between the holy and the common, neither have they caused men to discern between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Her priests have done violence to my law, and have profaned my holy things: they have made no distinction between the holy and the common, neither have they caused men to discern between the unclean and the clean, and have hidden their eyes from my Sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Her Priests haue broken my Lawe, and haue defiled mine holy things: they haue put no difference betweene the holy and prophane, neither discerned betweene the vncleane, and the cleane, and haue hid their eyes from my Sabbaths, and I am prophaned among them.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Its priests have wronged My law, And they pollute My holy things, Between holy and common they have not made separation, And between the unclean and the clean they have not made known, And from my sabbaths they have hidden their eyes, And I am pierced in their midst.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Ezekiel 22:26 delivers a profound and scathing indictment against the priests of Judah, accusing them of a comprehensive failure in their sacred duties. They are charged with violently transgressing God's divine law and actively profaning His holy things, fundamentally neglecting their crucial responsibility to discern and uphold the God-ordained distinctions between the holy and the common, and between the ritually clean and unclean. Furthermore, their deliberate disregard for God's Sabbaths underscores a profound spiritual blindness that culminated in the ultimate offense: the profanation of God Himself in the very midst of His people. This verse exposes the deep spiritual corruption within the religious leadership, highlighting a key reason for Judah's impending judgment and exile.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically placed within Ezekiel 22, a powerful prophetic oracle that systematically exposes the widespread corruption in Jerusalem, metaphorically depicted as a "bloody city" (Ezekiel 22:2). The chapter functions as a detailed legal indictment, meticulously cataloging the sins of various societal strata. It begins with the princes (Ezekiel 22:6-12), moves to the general populace (Ezekiel 22:13-16), then specifically targets the prophets (Ezekiel 22:25), before focusing intensely on the priests in Ezekiel 22:26, and concluding with the civil leaders (Ezekiel 22:27). This cumulative denunciation builds an irrefutable case for God's righteous wrath, which is explicitly stated as being poured out (Ezekiel 22:21). The immediate preceding verse condemns the prophets for their false messages and greed, setting a grim stage for the equally severe condemnation of the priests, who, as guardians of divine truth and holiness, were arguably even more culpable.

  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ezekiel's prophetic ministry unfolded during a profoundly turbulent era in Judah's history, encompassing the final years leading up to the Babylonian exile and the initial phase of the exile itself (approximately 593-571 BC). Though the temple in Jerusalem remained standing and the priestly system ostensibly operated, a deep-seated spiritual and moral decay had permeated every level of society. The priests, by divine mandate through the Mosaic Law, held an unparalleled and critical role in ancient Israel. Their responsibilities extended beyond merely mediating sacrifices and leading worship; they were divinely appointed to instruct the people in God's Torah, to discern and maintain the intricate distinctions of ritual purity, and to safeguard the sanctity of the sanctuary. Their profound failure to uphold these fundamental distinctions, particularly between the "holy and profane" and "clean and unclean" (as explicitly commanded in Leviticus 10:10-11), represented a catastrophic breakdown of the covenant relationship and a direct affront to God's holy character. Their disregard for the Sabbath, a foundational sign of the covenant (Exodus 31:13), further underscored their spiritual rebellion, laxity, and ultimate contempt for God's commands.

  • Key Themes: The overarching theme of Ezekiel 22:26 is the corruption of religious leadership and the devastating consequences that arise from blurring divine distinctions. The priests, who were divinely commissioned to be the custodians of holiness and purity within Israel, actively subverted these very principles through their actions. Their conduct vividly demonstrates a profound failure to uphold their covenant obligations, particularly the specific laws concerning ritual purity and the sacred observance of the Sabbath. This pervasive negligence directly led to the profanation of God's name, as their unholy and undiscerning behavior caused God to be perceived as common, trivial, and dishonored in the eyes of the people. This verse powerfully illustrates the biblical principle that spiritual leadership carries immense responsibility, and its dereliction of duty can precipitate widespread moral decay and inevitable divine judgment, a recurring and somber theme woven throughout the prophetic books, exemplified in passages like Jeremiah 23 and Malachi 2.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Violated (Hebrew, châmaç', H2554): From a primitive root meaning "to be violent; by implication, to maltreat." This word signifies more than a passive oversight or a simple transgression; it denotes an aggressive, forceful, and injurious breach against God's law. The priests' actions were not accidental but a deliberate, harmful assault on the divine order, akin to an act of violence against the covenant itself, demonstrating active malice or extreme disregard.
  • Profaned (Hebrew, châlal', H2490): A primitive root meaning "to bore, i.e. (by implication) to wound, to dissolve; figuratively, to profane (a person, place or thing), to break (one's word), to begin." This term appears twice in the verse, underscoring the act of making something sacred common, unholy, or defiled. It implies a deliberate desecration, stripping away the inherent sacredness that God had invested in His law, His holy things, and ultimately, His own name. It represents a fundamental reversal of God's sanctifying work and purpose.
  • Difference (Hebrew, bâdal', H914): A primitive root meaning "to divide (in variation senses literally or figuratively, separate, distinguish, differ, select, etc.)." This term is absolutely crucial as it pinpoints the priests' most fundamental failure: their inability or unwillingness to discern and maintain the God-ordained distinctions between the sacred and the common, and between the ritually clean and unclean. Their failure to "divide" or "separate" these categories led to spiritual chaos, moral confusion, and the profound breakdown of holiness within the community.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Her priests have violated my law": This opening clause immediately identifies the primary culprits—the priests, who were divinely entrusted with safeguarding, interpreting, and teaching God's Torah—and their initial, aggressive offense. The verb "violated" (חָמַץ, châmaç) suggests a forceful, violent, or aggressive breach, implying active transgression rather than mere passive negligence.
  • "and have profaned mine holy things": Following their violation of the law, the priests extended their defilement to the sacred objects, places, and practices consecrated to God. "Holy things" (קֹדֶשׁ, qôdesh) encompasses anything set apart for God's exclusive use, including offerings, temple vessels, and the sanctuary itself. By profaning them, the priests treated what was inherently sacred as common or defiled, thereby undermining the very essence and integrity of worship.
  • "they have put no difference between the holy and profane": This is the central and most damning accusation, detailing the precise nature of their profanation. The Hebrew word for "difference" (בָּדַל, bâdal) means to separate, distinguish, or divide. The priests, by blurring the divinely established lines between that which God had set apart as holy (קֹדֶשׁ, qôdesh) and that which was common or unholy (חֹל, chôl), failed in their foundational duty to maintain God's moral and ceremonial order and to reflect His character.
  • "neither have they shewed [difference] between the unclean and the clean": This clause directly parallels the previous one, further emphasizing the priests' catastrophic failure in upholding ritual purity. The distinction between the unclean (טָמֵא, ṭâmêʼ) and the clean (טָהֹר, ṭâhôwr) was absolutely vital for Israel's ceremonial life and spiritual health, serving as a constant reminder of God's desire for purity among His people. Their inability or unwillingness to teach, discern, or enforce these distinctions led to widespread defilement and spiritual compromise.
  • "and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths": This charge highlights a deliberate and willful neglect, indicating spiritual blindness. The Sabbath (שַׁבָּת, shabbâth) was a foundational sign of the covenant between God and Israel, a holy day set apart for rest, worship, and remembrance of God's creative and redemptive work. By "hiding their eyes" (עָלַם, ʻâlam), the priests actively ignored, disregarded, or intentionally overlooked its sanctity, demonstrating a profound spiritual apathy and contempt for God's appointed times.
  • "and I am profaned among them": This final, devastating consequence reveals the ultimate and most grievous impact of the priests' actions. Their continuous violation of the law, profanation of holy things, blurring of distinctions, and deliberate disregard for the Sabbaths resulted in God Himself being treated as common, dishonored, and defiled in the eyes of the people. The very ones meant to exalt and guard God's holiness instead caused His glorious name to be blasphemed and His character diminished among His own covenant people.

Literary Devices

Ezekiel 22:26 employs several potent literary devices to amplify the gravity and comprehensive nature of the priests' sins. Parallelism is prominently featured in the repeated structure of "holy and profane" and "unclean and clean," which powerfully emphasizes the two primary categories of divine distinction that the priests utterly failed to uphold. This dual phrasing highlights the comprehensive and systemic nature of their neglect. Anthropomorphism is effectively used in the phrase "hid their eyes from my sabbaths," attributing a human action (willful concealment or turning away) to the priests' deliberate ignorance and active disregard for God's sacred commands, implying a conscious rejection of divine truth. The cumulative effect of the charges, building from violating the law to profaning holy things, then blurring essential distinctions, and finally neglecting the Sabbath, creates a powerful sense of climax, culminating in the most severe and damning indictment: "and I am profaned among them." This final statement serves as a stark consequence and a devastating summary, revealing that the priests' actions did not merely affect the people or the temple, but directly dishonored and defiled the very name and character of God Himself.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Ezekiel 22:26 profoundly underscores the theological significance of holiness and the grave responsibility inherent in spiritual leadership within the covenant. The priests' failure to distinguish between the holy and the profane, and the clean and the unclean, was not merely a ceremonial oversight but a fundamental assault on God's character and nature, for God Himself is utterly holy and demands holiness from His people. Their actions demonstrated a spiritual apathy and moral compromise that systematically eroded the very foundations of Israel's covenant relationship with Yahweh, leading directly to the profanation of God's name. This blurring of sacred boundaries ultimately contributed to the widespread moral and spiritual decay that necessitated divine judgment, powerfully illustrating that when those entrusted with upholding divine standards fail, the consequences are far-reaching, impacting both human society and the perception of God's glory and truth.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Ezekiel's searing indictment of the priests serves as a timeless and sobering mirror for all who claim to lead or follow God, both individually and corporately. The core issue of failing to distinguish between the holy and the profane, the clean and the unclean, remains a perpetual temptation in every generation. In our contemporary context, this translates to the insidious danger of spiritual compromise, where the distinctiveness and counter-cultural nature of Christian faith are blurred with worldly values, practices, or ideologies. When believers, particularly those in positions of spiritual leadership, fail to uphold God's immutable standards for holiness in doctrine, ethical conduct, and authentic worship, they not only diminish their own spiritual vitality but also inadvertently profane God's glorious name in the eyes of a watching and often skeptical world. This verse issues a profound call to a renewed commitment to rigorous discernment, urging us to meticulously examine our lives, ministries, and communities, ensuring that we do not treat what God has declared sacred as common, nor willfully hide our eyes from His clear commands, lest we too contribute to the dishonoring of His magnificent name and character.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what specific areas of my personal life, professional conduct, or ministry might I be inadvertently blurring the lines between what is truly holy and what is merely profane, or between what is clean and unclean in God's discerning eyes?
  • How does my daily conduct, my choices, and my approach to worship consistently reflect my genuine understanding (or potential misunderstanding) of God's absolute holiness and His demands for purity?
  • Am I, like the indicted priests, "hiding my eyes" from any of God's clear commands, ethical principles, or spiritual disciplines, perhaps those that seem inconvenient, personally challenging, or culturally unpopular?
  • What concrete, practical steps can I intentionally take this week to cultivate a deeper, more profound reverence for God's holiness and to live a life that clearly and consistently distinguishes between His divine ways and the often-compromising ways of the world?

FAQ

What was the primary responsibility of the priests in ancient Israel, and how did they fail in Ezekiel 22:26?

Answer: The primary responsibility of the priests in ancient Israel, as meticulously outlined in the Mosaic Law (e.g., Leviticus 10:10-11), was multifaceted: to mediate between God and the people through sacrifices, to teach God's Torah, and, most crucially, to maintain and instruct the people in the vital distinctions between the holy and the profane, and the clean and the unclean. They were the divinely appointed guardians of God's holiness within the community. In Ezekiel 22:26, they failed precisely in this foundational duty. They "put no difference" between these sacred categories, actively violating God's law, profaning His holy things, and neglecting His Sabbaths. This pervasive spiritual negligence and moral laxity led to the ultimate, devastating indictment: God Himself was "profaned among them," meaning His sacred character and glorious name were treated as common, dishonored, and diminished by the very ones who were meant to uphold and exalt them.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Ezekiel 22:26 vividly portrays the catastrophic failure of the Old Covenant priesthood to uphold God's holiness, a pervasive spiritual corruption that ultimately led to the profanation of God Himself among His people. This stark indictment serves as a powerful pointer to the perfect and ultimate High Priest, Jesus Christ. Unlike the corrupt priests who "violated God's law" and "profaned holy things," Jesus perfectly fulfilled the Law in every detail and perfectly embodied absolute holiness. Where the Old Testament priests failed to "put difference between the holy and profane" and "between the unclean and the clean," Jesus, though fully God, entered into our profane and defiled world, touching the ceremonially unclean (Mark 1:40-42) and associating with sinners (Luke 15:1-2), not to become defiled, but to powerfully make the unclean clean and the unholy holy through His own perfect purity and divine power. His sacrificial death on the cross was the ultimate act of purification, making a way for us, who were once spiritually profane and unclean, to be made holy and presented blameless before God (Colossians 1:22). Furthermore, while the priests "hid their eyes from my sabbaths," Jesus is the undisputed Lord of the Sabbath (Mark 2:27-28), fulfilling its true meaning as a spiritual rest found exclusively in Him (Matthew 11:28-30). Through His perfect life, atoning death, and glorious resurrection, Jesus perfectly upholds God's holiness and ensures that God is eternally glorified and honored among His new covenant people, the church, who are now called to be a "royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9) in Him, living lives that distinguish the holy from the profane.

Copy as

Commentary on Ezekiel 22 verses 23–31

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Here is, I. A general idea given of the land of Israel, how well it deserved the judgments coming to destroy it and how much it needed these judgments to refine it. Let the prophet tell her plainly, "Thou art the land that is not cleansed, not refined as metal is, and therefore needest to be again put into the furnace. Means and methods of reformation have been ineffectual; thou art not rained upon in the day of indignation." This was one of the judgments which God brought upon them in the day of his wrath, he withheld the rain from them, Jer 14:4. Or, "When thou art under the tokens of God's displeasure, even in the day of indignation thou art not rained upon; thou hast not received instruction by the prophets, whose doctrine is said to descend as the rain." Or, "When thou art corrected thou art not cleansed; thy filth is not carried away as that in the streets is by a sweeping rain. Nay, though it be a day of indignation with thee, yet thy filthiness, which should be done away, has become more offensive, as that of a city is in dry weather, when it is not rained upon." Or, "Thou hast nothing to refresh and comfort thyself with in the day of indignation; thou art not rained upon by divine consolations." So the rich man in torment had not a drop of water, or rain, to cool his tongue.

II. A particular charge drawn up against the several orders and degrees of men among them, which shows that they had all helped to fill the measure of the nation's guilt, but none had done any thing towards the emptying of it; they are therefore all alike.

1.They have every one corrupted his way, and those who should have been the brightest examples of virtue were ringleaders in iniquity and patterns of vice.

(1.)The prophets, who pretended to make known the mind of God to them, were not only deceivers, but devourers (Eze 22:25), and hardened them in their wickedness both by their preaching, wherein they promised them impunity and prosperity, and by their conversation, in which they were as profligate as any. There is a conspiracy of her prophets against God and religion, against the true prophets and all good men; they conspired together to be all in one song, as Ahab's prophets were, to assure them of peace in their sinful ways. Note, The unity which is found among pretenders to infallibility, and which they so much boast of, is only the result of a secret conspiracy against the truth. Satan is not divided against himself. The prophets are in conspiracy with the murderers and oppressors, to patronise and protect them in their wickedness, and justify what they did with their false prophecies, provided they may come in sharers with them in the profits of it. They are like a roaring lion ravening the prey; they thunder out threats against those whose ruin is aimed at, terrify them, or make them odious to the people, and so make themselves masters, [1.] Of their lives: They have devoured souls, have been accessory to the shedding of the blood of many an innocent person, and so have made many to become sorrowful widows who were comfortable wives. They have persecuted those to death who witnessed against their pretensions to prophecy and would not be imposed upon by their counterfeit commission. Or, They devoured souls by flattering sinners into a false peace and a vain hope, and seducing them into the paths of sin, which would be their eternal ruin. Note, Those who draw men to wickedness, and encourage them in it, are the devourers and murderers of their souls. [2.] Of their estates. When Naboth is slain they take possession of his vineyard; They have seized the treasure and precious things, as forfeited; some way or other they had of devouring the widows' houses, as the Pharisees, Mat 23:14. Or, They got this treasure, and all these precious things, as fees for false and flattering prophecies; for he that puts not into their mouths, they even prepare war against him, Mic 3:5. It was said with Jerusalem when such men as these passed for prophets.

(2.)The priests, who were teachers by office, and had the custody of the sacred things, and should have called the false prophets to account, were as bad as they, Eze 22:26. [1.] They violated the law of God, which they should have observed and taught others to observe. They made no conscience of the law of the priesthood, but openly broke it, and with contempt, as Hophni and Phinehas. They did what they had a mind, with an express non obstante - notwithstanding to the word of God. And how should those teach the people their duty who lived in contradiction to their own? [2.] They profaned God's holy things, about which they were to minister, and which they ought to have restrained others from the profanation of. They suffered those to eat of the holy things who were unqualified by the law. The table of the Lord was contemptible with them. By dealing in holy things with such unhallowed hands they did themselves profane them. [3.] They did not themselves put a difference, nor did they show the people how to put a difference, between the holy and profane, the clean and the unclean, according to the directions and distinctions of the law. They did not exclude those from God's courts who were excluded by the law, nor teach the people to observe the difference the law had made between food clean and unclean, between times and places holy and common; but they lived at large themselves and encouraged the people to do so too. [4.] They hid their eyes from God's sabbaths; they took no care about them; it was all one to them whether God's sabbaths were kept holy or no; they neither gave countenance to those who observed them nor check to those who profaned them, nor did they themselves show any regard to them or veneration for them. They winked at those who did servile works on that day, and looked another way when they should have inspected the behaviour of the people on sabbath days. God's sabbaths have such a beauty and glory put upon them by the divine institution as may command respect; but they hid their eyes from them and would not see that excellency in them. [5.] By all this God himself was profaned among them; his authority was slighted, his goodness made light of, and the highest affront and contempt imaginable were put upon his holiness. Note, The profanation of the honour of the scriptures, of sabbaths and sacred things, is a profanation of the honour of God himself, who is interested in them.

(3.)The princes, who should have interposed with their authority to redress these grievances, were as daring transgressors of the law as any (Eze 22:27): They are like wolves ravening the prey; for such is power without justice and goodness to direct it. All their business was to gratify, [1.] Their own pride and ambition, by making themselves arbitrary and formidable. [2.] Their own malice and revenge, by shedding blood and destroying souls, sacrificing to their cruelty all those that stood in their way or had in any thing disobliged them. [3.] Their own avarice; all they aim at is to get dishonest gain, by crushing and oppressing their subject. Lucri bonus est odor ex re qualibet. Rem, rem, quocunque modo rem - Sweet is the odour of gain, from whatever substance it ascends. Money, money, by fairness or by fraud, get money. But, though they had power sufficient to carry them on in their oppressive courses, yet how could they answer it both to their credit and to their consciences? We are told how (Eze 22:28): The prophets daubed them with untempered mortar, told them in God's name (horrid wickedness!) that there was no harm in what they did, that they might dispose of the lives and estates of their subjects as they pleased, and could do no wrong, nay, that in prosecuting such and such whom they had marked out they did God service; and thus they stopped the mouth of their consciences. They also justified what they did, to the people, nay, and magnified it as if it were all for the public good, and so saved their reputation, and kept their oppressed subjects from murmuring. Note, Daubing prophets are the great supporters of ravening princes, but will prove at last their great deceivers, for they daub with untempered mortar which will not hold, nor will the wall stand long that is built up with it. They pretend to be seers, but they see vanity; they pretend to be diviners, but they divine lies; they pretend a warrant from Heaven for what they say, and that it is all as true as gospel; they say, Thus saith the Lord God, but it is all a sham, for the Lord has not spoken any such thing.

(4.)The people that had any power in their hands learned of their princes to abuse it, Eze 22:29. Those that should have complained of the oppression of the subject, and have put in a claim of rights on behalf of the injured, that should have stood up for liberty and property, were themselves invaders of them: The people of the land have used oppression and exercised robbery. The rich oppress the poor, masters their servants, landlords their tenants, and even parents their own children; nay, the buyers and sellers will find some way to oppress one another. This is such a sin as, when it is national, is indeed a national judgment, and is threatened as such. Isa 3:5, The people shall be oppressed every one by his neighbour. It is an aggravation of the sin that they have vexed the poor and needy, whom they should have relieved, and have oppressed the stranger and deprived him of his right, to whom they ought to have been not only just, but kind. Thus was the apostasy universal and the disease epidemical.

2.There is none that appears as an intercessor for them (v. 30): I sought for a man among them that should stand in the gap, but I found none. Note, (1.) Sin makes a gap in the hedge of protection that is about a people at which good things run out from them and evil things pour in upon them, a gap by which God enters to destroy them. (2.) There is a way of standing in the gap, and making up the breach against the judgments of God, by repentance, and prayer, and reformation. Moses stood in the gap when he made intercession for Israel to turn away the wrath of God, Psa 106:23. (3.) When God is coming forth against a sinful people to destroy them he expects some to intercede for them, and enquires if there be but one that does; so much is it his desire and delight to show mercy. If there be but a man that stands in the gap, as Abraham for Sodom, he will discover him and be well pleased with him. (4.) It bodes ill to a people when judgments are breaking in upon them, and the spirit of prayer is restrained, so that not one is found that will either give them a good word or speak a good word for them. (5.) When it is so, what can be expected but utter ruin? Therefore have I poured out my indignation upon them (Eze 22:31), have given it full scope, that it may come upon them in a full stream; yet, whatever God's wrath inflicts upon a people, it is their own way that is therein recompensed upon their heads, and God deals with them no worse, but even much better, than their iniquity deserves.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 23–31. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Verse 35, 36, and following) And I will bring you into a desert of peoples, and there I will judge you face to face. Just as I contended with your fathers in the desert of the land of Egypt, so I will judge you, says the Lord. And I will subject you to my scepter, and I will bring you into the bonds of the covenant, and I will choose from among you the transgressors and the wicked: from their place of residence I will bring them out, and they will not enter the land of Israel, and you will know that I am the Lord. Thus says the Lord: I will do for you who are in Babylon, and now serve idols, what I did for your ancestors in Egypt. I will lead you into the desert of the peoples, and there I will judge you face to face, just as I contended with them in judgment when they came out of Egypt. And after I have judged you, I will subject you to my scepter and rule, and I will make a covenant with you and bring you into your land with the bonds of love, so that bound by my love, you will never be able to depart from me. But I will choose from among you the transgressors and the wicked, who persist in the hardness of their hearts in evil deeds, not for possession, but for rejection. And I will indeed bring them out of the land of their dwelling, so that when they are brought out, they will not enter the land of Israel; but they will perish in various regions. And by the distinction between good and evil, you shall know that I am the Lord, who judges all things. The rest of the discourse hastens, and we briefly go through each point, in order to provide only the meaning to the readers.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Verse 23 and following) And the word of the Lord came to me, saying: Son of man, say to him: You are unclean land, not cleansed on the day of wrath. The conspiracy of the prophets within it, like a roaring lion seizing its prey: they have devoured souls, taken riches and precious things, multiplied widows within it. Its priests have despised my law and defiled my sanctuaries. They have not kept a distance between the holy and the profane, and they have not understood the difference between the unclean and the clean. They have turned their eyes away from my sabbaths, and I have been defiled among them. Her princes in the midst of her are like wolves tearing the prey to shed blood, and to destroy souls, and to get dishonest gain. And her prophets have daubed them without tempering the mortar, seeing vain things, and divining lies unto them, saying: Thus saith the Lord God: whereas the Lord hath not spoken. The people of the land have used oppression, and exercised robbery, and have done violence to the needy and poor, and have oppressed the stranger wrongfully. And I sought among them a man who would interpose a wall, and stand opposite me for the land, so that I would not destroy it, and I did not find one. So I poured out my indignation upon them, I consumed them with the fire of my wrath. I repaid their deeds upon their heads,’ says the Lord God. A diligent listener could inquire about the impurities that violate the purity of silver, and have been mixed with copper, lead, tin, and iron. Therefore, what is expressed there under the image of a city and a furnace, is proclaimed as under the likeness of land that is not irrigated and does not receive rain. We should understand those rains about which it is written: I will command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it (Isa. V, 6); we expect when a temporary and late rain is given to us, about which it is written: You will separate voluntary rain, O God, for your inheritance (Ps. LXVII, 10). But it is a day of fury, which each person procures for themselves with a multitude of sins. We desire to know what the scum of the city is, which is the hardness and foulness of the earth, full of thorns and briers. The conspiracy, he says, of the Prophets, or according to the LXX, the leaders in the midst of it having the likeness of a lion, about which Peter writes: Our adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, goeth about (I Peter V, 8). This lion and all its companions do not seek to devour bodies, but souls, and they receive rewards and judge everything by money. That this indeed happened to the people of the Jews at that time is beyond doubt. For the Lord brought evil upon them because of the priests, and the rulers, and the prophets. But in our Jerusalem we often see this: those who, according to the Seventy, devour souls in power, and accept payment to make many widows who have lost the Lord as their spouse. However, this is the faction and conspiracy of these prophets, that they may be each other's supporters and do all things for the sake of filthy gain. The priests who should be the leaders of the temple, from whose mouth the knowledge of the Law is sought, violate the sanctuaries, and there is no distinction between the holy and the profane except for money. They turn their eyes away from the Sabbath, and they do not recognize the rest of God which is in the knowledge of the Scriptures; neither do they say with the prophet: Open my eyes, and I will consider the wonders of your law (Psalm 118:18). Nor do they say what the Apostle says: But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord (2 Corinthians 3:18). Among such prophets and priests, the Lord's mediator is defiled, of whom it is written: But there stands among you one whom you do not know (John 1:26). Therefore, prophets or leaders are compared to lions. But the princes whom we understand to be of a lower rank imitate the rapaciousness of wolves, so that they shed not the blood of bodies, but of souls, and they greedily pursue gains, not at all satisfied with that: 'They who serve the altar, live by the altar' (1 Corinthians 9:13); but after they have approached the ministry of God, they gather the riches of Croesus. Even those prophets who foretell future events anointed them without moderation, as we have already said, of the prophesying prophets, who anointed a wall without the mixture of plaster, which is dissolved by rain. They see such things as empty, and not so much prophesy as they divine falsehood, saying to the miserable land: 'Thus says the Lord, the Lord promises this', when the Lord has not spoken to them. But the people of the land are not of God, but rather imitators of earthly works, rulers and priests, who by deceit and power do all things: not oppressing the rich, but rather the poor, of whom it is written: 'But the poor cannot endure a threat.' And: The redemption of a man's soul, by his own wealth (Prov. XIII, 8). They also oppressed the stranger and foreigner, who had not yet become a citizen of the Church, but only a listener, and who had the beginnings of faith, with slander: so that after they had gone through the sea and the dry land, they would make him a proselyte and make him a child of hell. Among such a multitude of vices and crimes, I sought for a man who could resist my anger, and who could stand against my fire and my burning, like Moses, and Aaron, and Samuel; but I could not find one. And he spoke to Moses, saying: Let me alone, that my wrath may be kindled against them, and that I may destroy them (Exodus 32:10). And because I could not find anyone who resisted and held me back, I poured out my indignation upon them, and consumed them, not without measure and judgment, but to repay their ways upon their own heads, attributing their own sins to them as authors, or certainly to the heads of the people, the leaders, princes, and prophets, of whom none dared to resist the angry Lord, and for whose sake the land remained barren and desolate, not deserving to receive the rain of the Lord.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Ver. 23, 24 onwards) Again, I raised my hand against them in the wilderness, to scatter them among the nations and disperse them in the lands, because they had not performed my judgments, and had rejected my commandments, and had violated my Sabbaths, and their eyes had been after the idols (or thoughts) of their fathers. Therefore, I also gave them statutes that were not good, and judgments in which they would not live, and I defiled them in their offerings (or transgressions), as they offered (or led astray) everything that opens the womb because of their sins (for which the Septuagint translated, to destroy them and what they had overlooked): and they will know that I am the Lord. Where in the Old Testament, against their children, who fell in the wilderness, the Lord lifted up His hand to scatter them among the nations, Scripture does not say; but it is to be believed that this was done in accordance with what is reported here. Or he signifies by this, that after they entered the promised land, they were given over at various times, for many sins, to different nations and kings, and at that time the commandments of the Lord, which were good according to their nature, and the judgments by which believers could live, were made not good for them, since they were in no way able to keep the precepts of the law in captivity, and to do what the divine word commanded. He did not say, 'I gave them evil commandments,' but, 'not good commandments.' For it does not immediately follow that what is not good is evil, as the Apostle teaches, it is good for a man not to touch a woman; but because of incontinence, let each possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor (I Cor. VII). And if he does not do this, it is neither good nor evil. Therefore, God gave them, dispersed among the nations, not good commandments, that is, he allowed them to follow their own thoughts and desires, to do what is not appropriate. And he defiled them in his gifts: just as a Priest separates lepers from the people, and shows that they are defiled; while they offer to idols what they should offer to God. And they pass everything that opens the womb through the fire of Baal, that is, the firstborn; so that after they have deserted God and been handed over to the worship of idols, then they may understand that He is the Lord whom they have provoked to anger by their own fault. Symmachus interpreted this passage more explicitly, treating the future as past. Therefore, I will also give them bad precepts and judgments for which they will not live, and I will defile them because of their gifts, as they consecrate and offer everything that opens the womb, so that I may destroy them, and they will know that I am the Lord. And the meaning is this: because I have seen the sons of the fathers equaling the wickedness of their ancestors and doing the same things for which they offended God, I wanted to divide them into nations and disperse them throughout the whole world, and give them bad precepts and judgments in which they would not live, so that I may defile them with their gifts, for they consecrated everything that opens the womb to idols, and I may destroy them forever, and they will know that I am the Lord. Through which he showed that he had not given them good commandments who dwelt in the wilderness, but to those whom he wanted to scatter among the nations, and to make foreigners in the whole world, he gave them a desire for things that he did not give: so that there they would do good commandments of God, not good because of their own fault, while they exhibited to idols what God had commanded to be exhibited. This can also be said, that before the offense, they received only the Ten Commandments; but after idolatry and blasphemy, they received multiple ceremonies of the law, so that they would offer victims to God rather than to demons, and by comparison with sacrilege, what was not good in itself became lighter, and by no means evil, because it was offered to God, and yet not good, because they offended the author of good.
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Ezekiel
(Verse 27, 29 onwards) Therefore speak to the house of Israel, son of man, and tell them: Thus says the Lord God: Moreover, your fathers have blasphemed against me and have treated me with contempt, even as they spurned me. And I brought them into the land that I had lifted my hand to give them ((Vulgate adds: that land)): they saw every high hill and every leafy tree, and there they offered their sacrifices and presented there the irritation of their offerings, and they placed there the fragrance of their sweetness, and they poured out their ((Vulgate is silent on this)) libations there. And I said to them, 'What is the high place to which you are going?' And its name was called the High Place until this day. Therefore speak to the house of Israel, son of man, and say to them, 'Thus says the Lord God: As for your fathers, they have provoked Me to anger by their iniquities, by the fact that they have fallen away from Me. So I brought them into the land that I had lifted My hand in an oath to give them.' They saw every high hill and every leafy tree, and there they offered their sacrifices. They also presented there the provocation of their gifts, and they set there their pleasing aroma, and they poured out there their drink offerings. And I said to them: What is abbana, because you enter there? And they called its name abbana until this day. I wanted, he said, to scatter them in the wilderness, and to give them not good precepts, so that they would sacrifice to idols what they should have offered to me, and consecrate all their first-fruits to them by fire, so that I might kill them and destroy them. But when he says, I wanted, he shows that he did not do what he wanted. And that which follows: 'And they shall know that I am the Lord,' is not found in the Septuagint. For it did not seem fitting to them to know after their destruction that he himself is the Lord. But you, son of man, speak again to them, that is, to the elders of the house of Israel, who have come to inquire of you: Your fathers, from whom you have descended, have also blasphemed against me and held me in contempt; after I brought them into the land which I had given them to possess, they turned against me to provoke me. For when they saw every high hill and leafy tree, they would sacrifice on the mountains and in the groves and thickets, and offer victims to the idols, and pour out libations. And when I saw this, I said to them: What is this, Bama? for it is called high: or why do you enter into such a place which you have chosen for yourselves in all the hills, so that even today these places are called Bamoth, and the ancient error retains its original name? Regarding Bama, which we translate as excelsum, there is an error in the Septuagint edition, where it is written as ἀββανὰ, which does not resonate in the Hebrew language. Bama can mean 'in which' if the two syllables are divided into two words, but in the present context, that sense does not fit. However, wherever it is written in the Books of Kings and Chronicles: 'The people still sacrificed and offered incense on the high places,' Bama in the singular and Bamoth in the plural mean 'high places.'
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Ezekiel 22:26 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.